首页 > 最新文献

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science最新文献

英文 中文
Giving Generic Language Another Thought. 给通用语言另一种思考。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.70000
Eleonore Neufeld, Anne Bosse, Guillermo Del Pinal, Rachel Sterken

According to an influential research program in cognitive science, philosophy, and linguistics, there is a deep, special connection between generics and pernicious aspects of social cognition, such as stereotyping. Specifically, generics are thought to exacerbate our propensity to essentialize, lead us to overgeneralize based on scarce evidence and to other epistemically dubious patterns of inference. Recently, however, several studies have put empirical and theoretical pressure on some of the main tenets of this research program. The goal of this paper is to bring these results together in a comprehensive narrative and systematically evaluate their impact on the hypothesis that generics have a uniquely problematic effect on our social and cognitive capacities.

根据认知科学、哲学和语言学领域的一个有影响力的研究项目,在社会认知的普遍性和有害方面(如刻板印象)之间存在着深刻而特殊的联系。具体来说,泛型被认为会加剧我们的本质化倾向,导致我们在缺乏证据的基础上过度概括,以及其他认知上可疑的推理模式。然而,最近有几项研究对这一研究计划的一些主要原则提出了实证和理论压力。本文的目标是将这些结果综合在一起,并系统地评估它们对假设的影响,即仿制药对我们的社会和认知能力有独特的问题影响。
{"title":"Giving Generic Language Another Thought.","authors":"Eleonore Neufeld, Anne Bosse, Guillermo Del Pinal, Rachel Sterken","doi":"10.1002/wcs.70000","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.70000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to an influential research program in cognitive science, philosophy, and linguistics, there is a deep, special connection between generics and pernicious aspects of social cognition, such as stereotyping. Specifically, generics are thought to exacerbate our propensity to essentialize, lead us to overgeneralize based on scarce evidence and to other epistemically dubious patterns of inference. Recently, however, several studies have put empirical and theoretical pressure on some of the main tenets of this research program. The goal of this paper is to bring these results together in a comprehensive narrative and systematically evaluate their impact on the hypothesis that generics have a uniquely problematic effect on our social and cognitive capacities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"e70000"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143366557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Catching Mind Wandering With Pupillometry: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges. 用瞳孔测量法捕捉思维游移:概念和方法论挑战。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1695
Claudia Pelagatti, Elvio Blini, Manila Vannucci

Mind-wandering (MW) refers to the shift of attention away from an ongoing task and/or external environment towards mental contents (e.g., memories, prospective thoughts) unrelated to the task. Physiological measures (e.g., pupil size, EEG, and fMRI) have often been acquired as objective markers for MW states, which has greatly helped their study as well as triangulation with other measures. Pupillometry in particular has been used as a covert biomarker of MW because it is reliably modulated by several distinct processes spanning arousal, emotion, and attention, and it signals attentional lapses. Yet, coupling MW and the measurement of pupil size has led to seemingly contrasting results. We argue that, common to the studies reviewed here, one reason is resolving to the measurement of tonic pupil size, which reflects low-frequency, slow changes in one's physiological state, and thus implicitly assumes that MW is a static, long-lasting process. We then additionally focus on three major axes of variability in the reviewed studies: (i) the definition and measurement of MW; (ii) the impact of contextual aspects, such as task demands and individual arousal levels; (iii) the identification and tracking of MW in combination with pupillary measures. We provide an overview of these differences and put forward recommendations for using physiological measures-including, but not limited to, pupil size-in MW research effectively. In conclusion, pupillometry can be a very informative tool for MW research, provided that it is used with the due methodological caution.

思维游离(MW)是指注意力从正在进行的任务和/或外部环境转向与任务无关的心理内容(如记忆、前瞻性思维)。生理学测量(如瞳孔大小、脑电图和 fMRI)经常被用作 MW 状态的客观标记,这极大地帮助了对它们的研究以及与其他测量的三角测量。瞳孔测量尤其被用作注意力缺失的隐蔽生物标志物,因为它能可靠地受到唤醒、情绪和注意力等多个不同过程的调节,并能发出注意力缺失的信号。然而,将注意力强度与瞳孔大小的测量结合起来,却得出了看似截然不同的结果。我们认为,本文所回顾的研究的一个共同原因是,对强直性瞳孔大小的测量反映了一个人生理状态的低频、缓慢变化,因此隐含地假定了MW是一个静态、持久的过程。接下来,我们将重点讨论综述研究中存在差异的三个主要方面:(i) MW 的定义和测量;(ii) 情境方面的影响,如任务要求和个体唤醒水平;(iii) 结合瞳孔测量识别和跟踪 MW。我们对这些差异进行了概述,并提出了有效使用生理测量(包括但不限于瞳孔大小)进行小脑研究的建议。总之,瞳孔测量法可以作为一种非常有用的工具用于小儿麻痹症的研究,但在使用时必须在方法上保持应有的谨慎。
{"title":"Catching Mind Wandering With Pupillometry: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges.","authors":"Claudia Pelagatti, Elvio Blini, Manila Vannucci","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1695","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1695","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mind-wandering (MW) refers to the shift of attention away from an ongoing task and/or external environment towards mental contents (e.g., memories, prospective thoughts) unrelated to the task. Physiological measures (e.g., pupil size, EEG, and fMRI) have often been acquired as objective markers for MW states, which has greatly helped their study as well as triangulation with other measures. Pupillometry in particular has been used as a covert biomarker of MW because it is reliably modulated by several distinct processes spanning arousal, emotion, and attention, and it signals attentional lapses. Yet, coupling MW and the measurement of pupil size has led to seemingly contrasting results. We argue that, common to the studies reviewed here, one reason is resolving to the measurement of tonic pupil size, which reflects low-frequency, slow changes in one's physiological state, and thus implicitly assumes that MW is a static, long-lasting process. We then additionally focus on three major axes of variability in the reviewed studies: (i) the definition and measurement of MW; (ii) the impact of contextual aspects, such as task demands and individual arousal levels; (iii) the identification and tracking of MW in combination with pupillary measures. We provide an overview of these differences and put forward recommendations for using physiological measures-including, but not limited to, pupil size-in MW research effectively. In conclusion, pupillometry can be a very informative tool for MW research, provided that it is used with the due methodological caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1695"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Compositionality in perception: A framework. 感知的组合性:一个框架。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1691
Kevin J Lande

Perception involves the processing of content or information about the world. In what form is this content represented? I argue that perception is widely compositional. The perceptual system represents many stimulus features (including shape, orientation, and motion) in terms of combinations of other features (such as shape parts, slant and tilt, common and residual motion vectors). But compositionality can take a variety of forms. The ways in which perceptual representations compose are markedly different from the ways in which sentences or thoughts are thought to be composed. I suggest that the thesis that perception is compositional is not itself a concrete hypothesis with specific predictions; rather it affords a productive framework for developing and evaluating specific empirical hypotheses about the form and content of perceptual representations. The question is not just whether perception is compositional, but how. Answering this latter question can provide fundamental insights into perception. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Representation Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Psychology > Perception and Psychophysics.

感知涉及对世界内容或信息的处理。这些内容是以何种形式表现出来的呢?我认为,感知具有广泛的构成性。知觉系统通过其他特征(如形状部分、斜度和倾斜度、共同运动矢量和剩余运动矢量)的组合来表示许多刺激特征(包括形状、方向和运动)。但是,组合性可以有多种形式。知觉表征的构成方式与人们认为的句子或思想的构成方式明显不同。我认为,感知是构成性的这一论点本身并不是一个具有具体预测的具体假说;相反,它为发展和评估有关感知表征形式和内容的具体经验假说提供了一个富有成效的框架。问题不仅在于知觉是否具有构成性,还在于知觉如何构成。回答后一个问题可以为知觉提供根本性的见解。本文归类于哲学 > 表征 哲学 > 认知科学基础 心理学 > 感知与心理物理学。
{"title":"Compositionality in perception: A framework.","authors":"Kevin J Lande","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1691","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perception involves the processing of content or information about the world. In what form is this content represented? I argue that perception is widely compositional. The perceptual system represents many stimulus features (including shape, orientation, and motion) in terms of combinations of other features (such as shape parts, slant and tilt, common and residual motion vectors). But compositionality can take a variety of forms. The ways in which perceptual representations compose are markedly different from the ways in which sentences or thoughts are thought to be composed. I suggest that the thesis that perception is compositional is not itself a concrete hypothesis with specific predictions; rather it affords a productive framework for developing and evaluating specific empirical hypotheses about the form and content of perceptual representations. The question is not just whether perception is compositional, but how. Answering this latter question can provide fundamental insights into perception. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Representation Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Psychology > Perception and Psychophysics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1691"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141161627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An update of the development of motor behavior. 运动行为发展的最新进展。
IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1682
John M Franchak, Karen E Adolph

This primer describes research on the development of motor behavior. We focus on infancy when basic action systems are acquired-posture, locomotion, manual actions, and facial actions-and we adopt a developmental systems perspective to understand the causes and consequences of developmental change. Experience facilitates improvements in motor behavior and infants accumulate immense amounts of varied everyday experience with all the basic action systems. At every point in development, perception guides behavior by providing feedback about the results of just prior movements and information about what to do next. Across development, new motor behaviors provide new inputs for perception. Thus, motor development opens up new opportunities for acquiring knowledge and acting on the world, instigating cascades of developmental changes in perceptual, cognitive, and social domains. This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development Psychology > Motor Skill and Performance Neuroscience > Development.

这本入门书介绍了有关运动行为发展的研究。我们将重点放在婴儿期基本动作系统--姿势、运动、手部动作和面部动作--的习得上,并采用发展系统的视角来理解发展变化的原因和后果。经验能促进运动行为的改善,婴儿在所有基本动作系统方面积累了大量不同的日常经验。在发育的每一个阶段,感知都会通过对先前动作结果的反馈和下一步该做什么的信息来指导行为。在整个发展过程中,新的运动行为会为感知提供新的输入。因此,运动的发展为获取知识和对世界采取行动提供了新的机会,在感知、认知和社会领域引发了一连串的发展变化。本文归类于认知生物学 > 认知发展 心理学 > 运动技能与表现 神经科学 > 发展。
{"title":"An update of the development of motor behavior.","authors":"John M Franchak, Karen E Adolph","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1682","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1682","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This primer describes research on the development of motor behavior. We focus on infancy when basic action systems are acquired-posture, locomotion, manual actions, and facial actions-and we adopt a developmental systems perspective to understand the causes and consequences of developmental change. Experience facilitates improvements in motor behavior and infants accumulate immense amounts of varied everyday experience with all the basic action systems. At every point in development, perception guides behavior by providing feedback about the results of just prior movements and information about what to do next. Across development, new motor behaviors provide new inputs for perception. Thus, motor development opens up new opportunities for acquiring knowledge and acting on the world, instigating cascades of developmental changes in perceptual, cognitive, and social domains. This article is categorized under: Cognitive Biology > Cognitive Development Psychology > Motor Skill and Performance Neuroscience > Development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Co-perceiving: Bringing the social into perception. 共同感知:将社会融入感知
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1681
Ophelia Deroy, Louis Longin, Bahador Bahrami

Humans and other animals possess the remarkable ability to effectively navigate a shared perceptual environment by discerning which objects and spaces are perceived by others and which remain private to themselves. Traditionally, this capacity has been encapsulated under the umbrella of joint attention or joint action. In this comprehensive review, we advocate for a broader and more mechanistic understanding of this phenomenon, termed co-perception. Co-perception encompasses the sensitivity to the perceptual engagement of others and the capability to differentiate between objects perceived privately and those perceived commonly with others. It represents a distinct concept from mere simultaneous individual perception. Moreover, discerning between private and common objects doesn't necessitate intricate mind-reading abilities or mutual coordination. The act of perceiving objects as either private or common provides a comprehensive account for social scenarios where individuals simply share the same context or may even engage in competition. This conceptual framework encourages a re-examination of classical paradigms that demonstrate social influences on perception. Furthermore, it suggests that the impacts of shared experiences extend beyond affective responses, also influencing perceptual processes. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Attention Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Philosophy > Psychological Capacities.

人类和其他动物拥有一种非凡的能力,即通过分辨哪些物体和空间为他人所感知,哪些为自己所感知,从而有效地驾驭共享的感知环境。传统上,这种能力被概括为 "联合注意 "或 "联合行动"。在这篇综合评论中,我们主张从更广泛、更机械的角度来理解这一现象,并将其称为共同感知。共同感知包括对他人感知参与的敏感性,以及区分私人感知对象和与他人共同感知对象的能力。它是一个不同于单纯的个人同时感知的概念。此外,区分私人对象和共同对象并不需要复杂的读心能力或相互协调。将物体感知为私人或共同物体的行为,为个人仅仅共享同一环境,甚至可能参与竞争的社会场景提供了全面的解释。这一概念框架鼓励人们重新审视那些证明社会对感知有影响的经典范式。此外,它还表明,共享经验的影响超出了情感反应,也会影响知觉过程。本文归类于心理学 > 注意力 哲学 > 认知科学基础 哲学 > 心理能力。
{"title":"Co-perceiving: Bringing the social into perception.","authors":"Ophelia Deroy, Louis Longin, Bahador Bahrami","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1681","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans and other animals possess the remarkable ability to effectively navigate a shared perceptual environment by discerning which objects and spaces are perceived by others and which remain private to themselves. Traditionally, this capacity has been encapsulated under the umbrella of joint attention or joint action. In this comprehensive review, we advocate for a broader and more mechanistic understanding of this phenomenon, termed co-perception. Co-perception encompasses the sensitivity to the perceptual engagement of others and the capability to differentiate between objects perceived privately and those perceived commonly with others. It represents a distinct concept from mere simultaneous individual perception. Moreover, discerning between private and common objects doesn't necessitate intricate mind-reading abilities or mutual coordination. The act of perceiving objects as either private or common provides a comprehensive account for social scenarios where individuals simply share the same context or may even engage in competition. This conceptual framework encourages a re-examination of classical paradigms that demonstrate social influences on perception. Furthermore, it suggests that the impacts of shared experiences extend beyond affective responses, also influencing perceptual processes. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Attention Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Philosophy > Psychological Capacities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140872787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bias in perceptual learning. 知觉学习中的偏见
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1683
Madeleine Ransom, Robert L Goldstone

Perceptual learning is commonly understood as conferring some benefit to the learner, such as allowing for the extraction of more information from the environment. However, perceptual learning can be biased in several different ways, some of which do not appear to provide such a benefit. Here we outline a systematic framework for thinking about bias in perceptual learning and discuss how several cases fit into this framework. We argue these biases are compatible with an understanding in which perceptual learning is beneficial, but that its benefits are tied to both a person's narrow interests and the training environment or domain, and so if there are changes to either of these, then benefits can turn into liabilities, though these are often temporary. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Learning Philosophy > Value Linguistics > Language Acquisition.

知觉学习通常被理解为给学习者带来某种益处,例如可以从环境中提取更多信息。然而,知觉学习可能会以几种不同的方式出现偏差,其中有些似乎并不会带来这种益处。在此,我们概述了一个思考知觉学习偏差的系统框架,并讨论了几个案例如何与这一框架相匹配。我们认为,这些偏差与这样一种理解是一致的,即知觉学习是有益的,但它的益处与一个人狭隘的兴趣和训练环境或领域息息相关,因此,如果这两者中的任何一个发生了变化,那么益处就会变成负担,尽管这些负担往往是暂时的。本文归类于心理学 > 学习哲学 > 价值语言学 > 语言习得。
{"title":"Bias in perceptual learning.","authors":"Madeleine Ransom, Robert L Goldstone","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1683","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1683","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceptual learning is commonly understood as conferring some benefit to the learner, such as allowing for the extraction of more information from the environment. However, perceptual learning can be biased in several different ways, some of which do not appear to provide such a benefit. Here we outline a systematic framework for thinking about bias in perceptual learning and discuss how several cases fit into this framework. We argue these biases are compatible with an understanding in which perceptual learning is beneficial, but that its benefits are tied to both a person's narrow interests and the training environment or domain, and so if there are changes to either of these, then benefits can turn into liabilities, though these are often temporary. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Learning Philosophy > Value Linguistics > Language Acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1683"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140917236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Philosophy of cognitive science in the age of deep learning. 深度学习时代的认知科学哲学。
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1684
Raphaël Millière

Deep learning has enabled major advances across most areas of artificial intelligence research. This remarkable progress extends beyond mere engineering achievements and holds significant relevance for the philosophy of cognitive science. Deep neural networks have made significant strides in overcoming the limitations of older connectionist models that once occupied the center stage of philosophical debates about cognition. This development is directly relevant to long-standing theoretical debates in the philosophy of cognitive science. Furthermore, ongoing methodological challenges related to the comparative evaluation of deep neural networks stand to benefit greatly from interdisciplinary collaboration with philosophy and cognitive science. The time is ripe for philosophers to explore foundational issues related to deep learning and cognition; this perspective paper surveys key areas where their contributions can be especially fruitful. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Artificial Intelligence Computer Science and Robotics > Machine Learning.

深度学习在人工智能研究的大多数领域都取得了重大进展。这一令人瞩目的进步已超越了单纯的工程学成就,对认知科学哲学具有重要意义。深度神经网络在克服老式联结主义模型的局限性方面取得了长足进步,而老式联结主义模型曾一度占据认知哲学争论的中心舞台。这一发展与认知科学哲学中长期存在的理论争论直接相关。此外,目前与深度神经网络比较评估相关的方法论挑战也将大大受益于与哲学和认知科学的跨学科合作。哲学家们探索与深度学习和认知相关的基础性问题的时机已经成熟;这篇视角论文探讨了哲学家们的贡献尤其富有成效的关键领域。本文归类于哲学 > 人工智能 计算机科学与机器人 > 机器学习。
{"title":"Philosophy of cognitive science in the age of deep learning.","authors":"Raphaël Millière","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1684","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1684","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning has enabled major advances across most areas of artificial intelligence research. This remarkable progress extends beyond mere engineering achievements and holds significant relevance for the philosophy of cognitive science. Deep neural networks have made significant strides in overcoming the limitations of older connectionist models that once occupied the center stage of philosophical debates about cognition. This development is directly relevant to long-standing theoretical debates in the philosophy of cognitive science. Furthermore, ongoing methodological challenges related to the comparative evaluation of deep neural networks stand to benefit greatly from interdisciplinary collaboration with philosophy and cognitive science. The time is ripe for philosophers to explore foundational issues related to deep learning and cognition; this perspective paper surveys key areas where their contributions can be especially fruitful. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Artificial Intelligence Computer Science and Robotics > Machine Learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1684"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141077137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The development of gait and mobility: Form and function in infant locomotion. 步态和移动能力的发展:婴儿运动的形式与功能
IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1677
Christina M Hospodar, Karen E Adolph

The development of locomotion can be described by its form (i.e., gait) and its function (i.e., mobility). Both aspects of locomotion improve with experience. Traditional treatises on infant locomotion focus on form by describing an orderly progression of postural and locomotor milestones en route to characteristic patterns of crawling and walking gait. We provide a traditional treatment of gait by describing developmental antecedents of and improvements in characteristic gait patterns, but we highlight important misconceptions inherent in the notion of "milestones". Most critically, we argue that the prevailing focus on gait and milestones fails to capture the true essence of locomotion-functional mobility to engage with the world. Thus, we also describe the development of mobility, including the use of mobility aids for support and propulsion. We illustrate how infants find individual solutions for mobility and how the ability to move cascades into other domains of development. Finally, we show how an integration of gait and mobility provides insights into the psychological processes that make locomotion functional. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Motor Skill and Performance Psychology > Development and Aging.

运动的发展可以用其形式(即步态)和功能(即移动性)来描述。运动的这两个方面都会随着经验的积累而得到改善。关于婴儿运动的传统论述侧重于形式,描述了在形成爬行和行走步态特征模式的过程中,姿势和运动里程碑的有序进展。我们对步态进行了传统的处理,描述了特征步态模式的发展前因和改进,但我们强调了 "里程碑 "概念中固有的重要误解。最关键的是,我们认为目前对步态和里程碑的关注未能抓住运动的真正本质--参与世界的功能性移动。因此,我们还描述了移动能力的发展,包括使用移动辅助工具进行支撑和推进。我们说明了婴儿是如何为移动找到个人解决方案的,以及移动能力是如何串联到其他发展领域的。最后,我们展示了步态和移动能力的整合如何为运动功能的心理过程提供洞察力。本文归类于心理学 > 运动技能与表现 心理学 > 发育与衰老。
{"title":"The development of gait and mobility: Form and function in infant locomotion.","authors":"Christina M Hospodar, Karen E Adolph","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1677","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1677","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of locomotion can be described by its form (i.e., gait) and its function (i.e., mobility). Both aspects of locomotion improve with experience. Traditional treatises on infant locomotion focus on form by describing an orderly progression of postural and locomotor milestones en route to characteristic patterns of crawling and walking gait. We provide a traditional treatment of gait by describing developmental antecedents of and improvements in characteristic gait patterns, but we highlight important misconceptions inherent in the notion of \"milestones\". Most critically, we argue that the prevailing focus on gait and milestones fails to capture the true essence of locomotion-functional mobility to engage with the world. Thus, we also describe the development of mobility, including the use of mobility aids for support and propulsion. We illustrate how infants find individual solutions for mobility and how the ability to move cascades into other domains of development. Finally, we show how an integration of gait and mobility provides insights into the psychological processes that make locomotion functional. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Motor Skill and Performance Psychology > Development and Aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1677"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140159308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Language development, linguistic input, and linguistic racism. 语言发展、语言输入和语言种族主义。
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1673
Megan Figueroa

Language development is both remarkable and unremarkable. It is remarkable because children learn the language(s) around them, signed or spoken, without explicit instruction or correction. It is unremarkable because children have done this for thousands of years without worldwide incident or catastrophe. Yet, much research on this organic developmental phenomenon relies on an empirical falsehood: "quality" linguistic input is necessary to facilitate language development. "Quality" is a value judgment, not a structural feature of any human language. I argue selectively legitimizing some linguistic input as "quality" is possible only through mischaracterizing what language is. This falsehood is also linguistic racism because it is based on a deficit perspective of the early linguistic experiences of a subset of children, specifically racialized children. I explore how linguistic racism stalls our collective understanding of language development and promotes an environment of bad science. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language Acquisition Psychology > Language Neuroscience > Development.

语言的发展既显著又不显著。说它了不起,是因为儿童学习周围的语言,无论是手语还是口语,都不需要明确的指导或纠正。说它不起眼,是因为数千年来,儿童一直在这样做,没有发生过世界性的事件或灾难。然而,关于这一有机发展现象的许多研究都依赖于一个经验性的谬误:"高质量 "的语言输入是促进语言发展的必要条件。"质量 "是一种价值判断,而不是任何人类语言的结构特征。我认为,将某些语言输入选择性地合法化为 "优质",只有通过错误地描述语言的本质才有可能。这种谬误也是语言种族主义,因为它是基于对一部分儿童,特别是种族化儿童早期语言经验的缺陷视角。我将探讨语言种族主义如何阻碍我们对语言发展的集体理解,并助长不良的科学环境。本文归类于语言学 > 语言习得 心理学 > 语言 神经科学 > 发展。
{"title":"Language development, linguistic input, and linguistic racism.","authors":"Megan Figueroa","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1673","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1673","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Language development is both remarkable and unremarkable. It is remarkable because children learn the language(s) around them, signed or spoken, without explicit instruction or correction. It is unremarkable because children have done this for thousands of years without worldwide incident or catastrophe. Yet, much research on this organic developmental phenomenon relies on an empirical falsehood: \"quality\" linguistic input is necessary to facilitate language development. \"Quality\" is a value judgment, not a structural feature of any human language. I argue selectively legitimizing some linguistic input as \"quality\" is possible only through mischaracterizing what language is. This falsehood is also linguistic racism because it is based on a deficit perspective of the early linguistic experiences of a subset of children, specifically racialized children. I explore how linguistic racism stalls our collective understanding of language development and promotes an environment of bad science. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language Acquisition Psychology > Language Neuroscience > Development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1673"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139651815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What are delusions? Examining the typology problem. 什么是妄想症?研究类型学问题
IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-06 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1674
Pablo López-Silva, Miguel Núñez de Prado-Gordillo, Victor Fernández-Castro

Delusions are a heterogenous transdiagnostic phenomenon with a higher prevalence in schizophrenia. One of the most fundamental debates surrounding the philosophical understanding of delusions concerns the question about the type of mental state in which reports that we label as delusional are grounded, namely, the typology problem. The formulation of potential answers for this problem seems to have important repercussions for experimental research in clinical psychiatry and the development of psychotherapeutic tools for the treatment of delusions in clinical psychology. Problematically, such alternatives are scattered in the literature, making it difficult to follow the current development and state of the target discussion. This paper offers an updated critical examination of the alternatives to the typology problem currently available in the literature. After clarifying the two main philosophical views underlying the dominant formulation of the debate (interpretivism and functionalism), we follow the usual distinction between doxastic (the idea that delusions are a type of belief) and anti-doxastic views. We then introduce two new sub-distinctions; on the doxastic camp, we distinguish between revisionist and non-revisionist proposals; on the anti-doxastic camp, we distinguish between commonsensical and non-commonsensical anti-doxasticisms. After analyzing the main claims of each view, we conclude with some of the most fundamental challenges that remain open within the discussion. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Philosophy > Consciousness Philosophy > Psychological Capacities Neuroscience > Cognition.

妄想是一种异质的跨诊断现象,在精神分裂症中发病率较高。围绕着对妄想的哲学理解展开的最基本的争论之一,涉及到我们称之为妄想的报告所基于的精神状态的类型问题,即类型学问题。这个问题的潜在答案的提出似乎对临床精神病学的实验研究和临床心理学治疗妄想症的心理治疗工具的开发有着重要的影响。问题是,这些替代方案散见于文献中,很难跟上目标讨论的当前发展和状态。本文对目前文献中类型学问题的替代方案进行了最新的批判性研究。在澄清了这一争论的主要表述所依据的两种主要哲学观点(解释学和功能主义)之后,我们按照惯例区分了 "妄想 "观点(认为妄想是信念的一种)和 "反妄想 "观点。然后,我们引入了两个新的细分;在妄想论阵营,我们区分了修正主义和非修正主义建议;在反妄想论阵营,我们区分了常识性和非常识性反妄想论。在分析了每种观点的主要主张后,我们以讨论中仍未解决的一些最根本的挑战作为结论。本文归类于哲学 > 认知科学基础 哲学 > 意识 哲学 > 心理能力 神经科学 > 认知。
{"title":"What are delusions? Examining the typology problem.","authors":"Pablo López-Silva, Miguel Núñez de Prado-Gordillo, Victor Fernández-Castro","doi":"10.1002/wcs.1674","DOIUrl":"10.1002/wcs.1674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delusions are a heterogenous transdiagnostic phenomenon with a higher prevalence in schizophrenia. One of the most fundamental debates surrounding the philosophical understanding of delusions concerns the question about the type of mental state in which reports that we label as delusional are grounded, namely, the typology problem. The formulation of potential answers for this problem seems to have important repercussions for experimental research in clinical psychiatry and the development of psychotherapeutic tools for the treatment of delusions in clinical psychology. Problematically, such alternatives are scattered in the literature, making it difficult to follow the current development and state of the target discussion. This paper offers an updated critical examination of the alternatives to the typology problem currently available in the literature. After clarifying the two main philosophical views underlying the dominant formulation of the debate (interpretivism and functionalism), we follow the usual distinction between doxastic (the idea that delusions are a type of belief) and anti-doxastic views. We then introduce two new sub-distinctions; on the doxastic camp, we distinguish between revisionist and non-revisionist proposals; on the anti-doxastic camp, we distinguish between commonsensical and non-commonsensical anti-doxasticisms. After analyzing the main claims of each view, we conclude with some of the most fundamental challenges that remain open within the discussion. This article is categorized under: Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Philosophy > Consciousness Philosophy > Psychological Capacities Neuroscience > Cognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47720,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1674"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139111287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1