首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Academic Librarianship最新文献

英文 中文
Validating design principles for teaching information problem solving in higher education: Academic librarians' perspectives 验证高等教育中信息问题解决教学的设计原则:学术图书馆员的观点
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103183
Josien Boetje , Esther Zeedijk , Stan van Ginkel , Matthijs Smakman , Johan Versendaal , Erik Barendsen
Information Problem Solving (IPS) competence is vital for academic success. However, higher education students often struggle to use digital information effectively, underscoring the need for instructional interventions. Evidence-based design principles for teaching and learning IPS can guide such instructional design. Yet, it remains unclear whether academic librarians, who frequently teach IPS, find such principles useful and feasible to implement. This study validates seven design principles identified in a prior literature review. The study uses mixed-methods data from focus groups and surveys with 61 academic librarians at Dutch universities. Findings show that librarians perceive the principles as highly useful, yet practical adoption depends on ease of use, which was rated substantially lower. Ease of use was influenced by multiple external factors, including characteristics of librarians, faculty, and students, as well as their interactions within the learning environment. Among these, librarian-faculty collaboration proved critical for implementing key principles such as repeated instruction embedded in the curriculum and authentic learning tasks. These served as foundations for applying additional principles such as practice, support, and feedback. Despite barriers, librarians creatively adapted principles to local contexts. The study highlights the need for systemic support and collaboration to integrate IPS instruction effectively into higher education curricula.
信息问题解决能力对学术成功至关重要。然而,高等教育的学生往往难以有效地使用数字信息,这强调了教学干预的必要性。基于证据的教与学IPS设计原则可以指导这种教学设计。然而,目前还不清楚的是,经常教授IPS的学术图书馆员是否认为这些原则有用且可行。本研究验证了先前文献综述中确定的七个设计原则。该研究使用了来自焦点小组的混合方法数据,并对荷兰大学的61名学术图书馆员进行了调查。调查结果显示,图书馆员认为这些原则非常有用,但实际采用与否取决于是否容易使用,这一点的评分明显较低。易用性受到多种外部因素的影响,包括图书馆员、教师和学生的特点,以及他们在学习环境中的相互作用。其中,图书馆员与教师的合作被证明对实施关键原则至关重要,如课程中嵌入的重复教学和真实的学习任务。这些是应用其他原则(如实践、支持和反馈)的基础。尽管存在障碍,图书馆员创造性地根据当地情况调整了原则。该研究强调需要系统的支持和协作,以便将IPS教学有效地纳入高等教育课程。
{"title":"Validating design principles for teaching information problem solving in higher education: Academic librarians' perspectives","authors":"Josien Boetje ,&nbsp;Esther Zeedijk ,&nbsp;Stan van Ginkel ,&nbsp;Matthijs Smakman ,&nbsp;Johan Versendaal ,&nbsp;Erik Barendsen","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103183","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103183","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Information Problem Solving (IPS) competence is vital for academic success. However, higher education students often struggle to use digital information effectively, underscoring the need for instructional interventions. Evidence-based design principles for teaching and learning IPS can guide such instructional design. Yet, it remains unclear whether academic librarians, who frequently teach IPS, find such principles useful and feasible to implement. This study validates seven design principles identified in a prior literature review. The study uses mixed-methods data from focus groups and surveys with 61 academic librarians at Dutch universities. Findings show that librarians perceive the principles as highly useful, yet practical adoption depends on ease of use, which was rated substantially lower. Ease of use was influenced by multiple external factors, including characteristics of librarians, faculty, and students, as well as their interactions within the learning environment. Among these, librarian-faculty collaboration proved critical for implementing key principles such as repeated instruction embedded in the curriculum and authentic learning tasks. These served as foundations for applying additional principles such as practice, support, and feedback. Despite barriers, librarians creatively adapted principles to local contexts. The study highlights the need for systemic support and collaboration to integrate IPS instruction effectively into higher education curricula.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 103183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145797818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The CARE approach for academic librarians: From search first to answer first with generative AI 学术图书馆员的CARE方法:用生成式人工智能从先搜索到先回答
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103186
Leo S. Lo
Students and faculty are increasingly beginning their research by asking AI systems for explanations rather than by searching library resources. Chatbots and AI enhanced search tools now deliver fluent answers before users ever see a list of sources. This commentary argues that this “answer first” environment changes the starting point of academic inquiry and calls for a corresponding shift in academic librarianship. Librarians need an answer first mindset that recognizes AI responses as texts that require interpretation. I propose two related constructs to support that stance, a brief “answer typography” that helps librarians notice what kind of work AI answers are doing, and the CARE approach (Classify, Assess, Review, Enhance), which articulates a critical way of engaging those answers with users. Together, these ideas position librarians as leaders in helping their communities read, question, and build upon AI generated answers in ways that keep human judgment and scholarly evidence at the center of inquiry.
学生和教师越来越多地通过向人工智能系统寻求解释来开始他们的研究,而不是通过搜索图书馆资源。聊天机器人和人工智能增强的搜索工具现在在用户看到来源列表之前就能提供流利的答案。本文认为,这种“回答优先”的环境改变了学术探究的出发点,并要求学术图书馆工作进行相应的转变。图书管理员需要一种答案优先的心态,将人工智能的响应视为需要解释的文本。我提出了两个相关的结构来支持这一立场,一个是简短的“答案排版”,它可以帮助图书馆员注意到人工智能答案正在做什么样的工作,另一个是CARE方法(分类、评估、审查、增强),它阐明了一种与用户互动的关键方式。总之,这些想法将图书馆员定位为领导者,帮助他们的社区阅读、提问,并以人工智能生成的答案为基础,以人类判断和学术证据为调查的中心。
{"title":"The CARE approach for academic librarians: From search first to answer first with generative AI","authors":"Leo S. Lo","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103186","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103186","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Students and faculty are increasingly beginning their research by asking AI systems for explanations rather than by searching library resources. Chatbots and AI enhanced search tools now deliver fluent answers before users ever see a list of sources. This commentary argues that this “answer first” environment changes the starting point of academic inquiry and calls for a corresponding shift in academic librarianship. Librarians need an answer first mindset that recognizes AI responses as texts that require interpretation. I propose two related constructs to support that stance, a brief “answer typography” that helps librarians notice what kind of work AI answers are doing, and the CARE approach (Classify, Assess, Review, Enhance), which articulates a critical way of engaging those answers with users. Together, these ideas position librarians as leaders in helping their communities read, question, and build upon AI generated answers in ways that keep human judgment and scholarly evidence at the center of inquiry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 103186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145797769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Copyright: A case study in practical copyright education for college educators 探索版权:高校教育工作者实践版权教育的个案研究
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-12-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103184
Shelby Thaysen
An accelerated transition from in-person to online learning at Centennial College, an art and applied technology college in Toronto, Ontario, was catalyzed by the pandemic starting in early 2020. This change led to a significant rise in copyright inquiries to the library's copyright office, highlighting an immediate need for enhanced copyright education and support for effective application of copyright knowledge in online teaching environments.
In response to this need, the Exploring Copyright series was created by the library's copyright librarian. This outer-space themed series consisted of eight copyright “missions” tailored for faculty and staff involved in online teaching and course development. The series was presented online in sessions delivered every other week over the course of a semester. The material was subsequently compiled into a course environment with asynchronous modules and resources.
This paper will explore the evidence-based development, initial delivery, and evaluation of the Exploring Copyright series. It will examine how this initiative complemented the existing copyright literacy programs at Centennial College, addressing the evolving needs of the academic community.
Copyright education and outreach professionals in higher education may find this approach particularly useful. The Exploring Copyright series offered a flexible, community-driven model for adapting copyright education to suit a rapidly changing online environment.
2020年初开始的大流行推动了安大略省多伦多市百年纪念学院(Centennial College)从面对面学习向在线学习的加速过渡。百年纪念学院是一所艺术和应用技术学院。这一变化导致向图书馆版权局查询版权的人数显著增加,突出表明迫切需要加强版权教育,并支持在网上教学环境中有效应用版权知识。针对这一需求,图书馆的版权管理员创建了“探索版权”系列。这个外太空主题系列包括八个版权“任务”,为参与在线教学和课程开发的教职员工量身定制。该系列课程在一个学期的课程中每隔一周在线讲授一次。这些材料随后被编译成一个具有异步模块和资源的课程环境。本文将探讨“探索版权”系列的循证发展、初始交付和评估。它将研究这一举措如何补充百年纪念学院现有的版权扫盲计划,以满足学术界不断变化的需求。高等教育中的版权教育和外联专业人员可能会发现这种方法特别有用。探索版权系列提供了一个灵活的,社区驱动的模式,使版权教育适应快速变化的在线环境。
{"title":"Exploring Copyright: A case study in practical copyright education for college educators","authors":"Shelby Thaysen","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103184","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103184","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An accelerated transition from in-person to online learning at Centennial College, an art and applied technology college in Toronto, Ontario, was catalyzed by the pandemic starting in early 2020. This change led to a significant rise in copyright inquiries to the library's copyright office, highlighting an immediate need for enhanced copyright education and support for effective application of copyright knowledge in online teaching environments.</div><div>In response to this need, the <em>Exploring Copyright</em> series was created by the library's copyright librarian. This outer-space themed series consisted of eight copyright “missions” tailored for faculty and staff involved in online teaching and course development. The series was presented online in sessions delivered every other week over the course of a semester. The material was subsequently compiled into a course environment with asynchronous modules and resources.</div><div>This paper will explore the evidence-based development, initial delivery, and evaluation of the <em>Exploring Copyright</em> series. It will examine how this initiative complemented the existing copyright literacy programs at Centennial College, addressing the evolving needs of the academic community.</div><div>Copyright education and outreach professionals in higher education may find this approach particularly useful. The <em>Exploring Copyright</em> series offered a flexible, community-driven model for adapting copyright education to suit a rapidly changing online environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 103184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145797761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adoption of artificial intelligence in academic libraries: A systematic review of current practices, challenges, and research opportunities 人工智能在学术图书馆的应用:对当前实践、挑战和研究机会的系统回顾
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103185
Lateef Ayinde , Raphael Ebiefung , Bolaji David Oladokun
Given the strategic role of academic libraries in higher education, this study provides a systematic literature review on the current practices, challenges to the adoption of Artificial Intelligence and the future research directions in academic libraries. A total of 29 relevant articles were used for review based on their relevance. Only peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers published in the last five years (2020–2024) were selected and included in the study. Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Library and Information Science Abstract (LISA) were the databases consulted. The current practices were grouped into six major dimensions, including technical services, references and information services, administrative services and circulation, collection development, information literacy and user education, and professional development and collaboration. The results showed that the most prominent use of AI in academic libraries is for reference and information services. Furthermore, it was found that 48.28 % (14) of the articles cited Funding as the major institutional challenge to AI adoption in academic libraries. A cluster of studies included in the review emphasized the need for more user-driven research on AI applications in academic libraries. This study reflects the importance of retraining librarians to develop new competencies in managing AI-enhanced communication tools, including chatbot integration and prompt engineering.
鉴于高校图书馆在高等教育中的战略作用,本研究对高校图书馆采用人工智能的现状、面临的挑战以及未来的研究方向进行了系统的文献综述。根据相关性,共有29篇相关文章被用于审查。只有在过去五年(2020-2024年)发表的同行评审的期刊文章和会议论文被选中并纳入研究。参考了Web of Science、SCOPUS和Library and Information Science Abstract (LISA)数据库。目前的做法分为六个主要方面,包括技术服务、参考资料和信息服务、行政服务和流通、馆藏发展、信息素养和用户教育、专业发展和协作。结果表明,人工智能在高校图书馆中最突出的用途是参考和信息服务。此外,研究发现,48.28%(14篇)的文章认为资金是学术图书馆采用人工智能的主要制度挑战。该综述中包含的一系列研究强调了在学术图书馆中进行更多以用户为导向的人工智能应用研究的必要性。这项研究反映了对图书馆员进行再培训的重要性,以培养管理人工智能增强的通信工具(包括聊天机器人集成和提示工程)的新能力。
{"title":"Adoption of artificial intelligence in academic libraries: A systematic review of current practices, challenges, and research opportunities","authors":"Lateef Ayinde ,&nbsp;Raphael Ebiefung ,&nbsp;Bolaji David Oladokun","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103185","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103185","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the strategic role of academic libraries in higher education, this study provides a systematic literature review on the current practices, challenges to the adoption of Artificial Intelligence and the future research directions in academic libraries. A total of 29 relevant articles were used for review based on their relevance. Only peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers published in the last five years (2020–2024) were selected and included in the study. Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Library and Information Science Abstract (LISA) were the databases consulted. The current practices were grouped into six major dimensions, including technical services, references and information services, administrative services and circulation, collection development, information literacy and user education, and professional development and collaboration. The results showed that the most prominent use of AI in academic libraries is for reference and information services. Furthermore, it was found that 48.28 % (14) of the articles cited Funding as the major institutional challenge to AI adoption in academic libraries. A cluster of studies included in the review emphasized the need for more user-driven research on AI applications in academic libraries. This study reflects the importance of retraining librarians to develop new competencies in managing AI-enhanced communication tools, including chatbot integration and prompt engineering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 103185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145749769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are we ghosts in the machine? AI, agency, and the future of libraries 我们是机器里的鬼魂吗?人工智能、代理和图书馆的未来
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103181
Quincy Dalton McCrary
Artificial intelligence (AI) integration is fundamentally transforming information literacy and library-based research, often without student awareness or institutional review. As database vendors embed AI capabilities such as article summarization, enhanced search, and clinical decision support into familiar resources, students are increasingly engaging in a collaborative process that redistributes core tasks like source selection and information synthesis. This shift moves the research workflow from student-led inquiry toward machine-guided assistance. This article offers a conceptual analysis and theoretical framework for understanding this redistribution of agency, aiming to equip educators and librarians with vocabulary to address these changes and to pave the way for future empirical work. Without intervention, students risk becoming passive passengers in their own research process, potentially undermining the traditional goals of information literacy grounded in autonomy and deliberate practice. To ensure that AI enhances rather than replaces critical thinking, academic libraries must champion transparency, preserve choice in research methods, provide comprehensive AI literacy instruction, and maintain institutional accountability through ongoing assessment.
人工智能(AI)集成从根本上改变了信息素养和基于图书馆的研究,通常没有学生意识或机构审查。随着数据库供应商将人工智能功能(如文章摘要、增强搜索和临床决策支持)嵌入到熟悉的资源中,学生们越来越多地参与到重新分配核心任务(如资源选择和信息合成)的协作过程中。这种转变将研究工作流程从学生主导的调查转向机器指导的协助。本文为理解这种代理再分配提供了一个概念分析和理论框架,旨在为教育工作者和图书馆员提供应对这些变化的词汇,并为未来的实证工作铺平道路。如果没有干预,学生就有可能在自己的研究过程中成为被动的乘客,这可能会破坏以自主和刻意练习为基础的信息素养的传统目标。为了确保人工智能增强而不是取代批判性思维,学术图书馆必须倡导透明度,保留研究方法的选择,提供全面的人工智能素养指导,并通过持续评估维持机构问责制。
{"title":"Are we ghosts in the machine? AI, agency, and the future of libraries","authors":"Quincy Dalton McCrary","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103181","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103181","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) integration is fundamentally transforming information literacy and library-based research, often without student awareness or institutional review. As database vendors embed AI capabilities such as article summarization, enhanced search, and clinical decision support into familiar resources, students are increasingly engaging in a collaborative process that redistributes core tasks like source selection and information synthesis. This shift moves the research workflow from student-led inquiry toward machine-guided assistance. This article offers a conceptual analysis and theoretical framework for understanding this redistribution of agency, aiming to equip educators and librarians with vocabulary to address these changes and to pave the way for future empirical work. Without intervention, students risk becoming passive passengers in their own research process, potentially undermining the traditional goals of information literacy grounded in autonomy and deliberate practice. To ensure that AI enhances rather than replaces critical thinking, academic libraries must champion transparency, preserve choice in research methods, provide comprehensive AI literacy instruction, and maintain institutional accountability through ongoing assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 103181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145692592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Making data literacy accessible: A pilot study of academic library and community collaboration for citizen data literacy 使数据素养易于获取:一项促进公民数据素养的学术图书馆和社区合作的试点研究
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103166
Emily Zoe Mann
This article describes an academic librarian's experience of collaborating with community groups, including a public library system and philanthropic health equity group, to provide data literacy to communities outside of academia. The study covers a pilot that took place over the Fall 2024 semester that included four workshops developed to provide the building blocks of data literacy to citizens in Findings are applicable for those wanting to provide education outside of academic libraries to non-traditional audiences, those wishing to provide data literacy outside of a traditional curriculum, and those wanting to build their collaborative networks outside of the library.
本文描述了一位学术图书馆员与社区团体(包括公共图书馆系统和慈善健康权益组织)合作,向学术界以外的社区提供数据素养的经验。该研究涵盖了在2024年秋季学期进行的试点,其中包括四个研讨会,旨在为公民提供数据素养的构建模块,这些发现适用于那些希望在学术图书馆外向非传统受众提供教育的人,那些希望在传统课程外提供数据素养的人,以及那些希望在图书馆外建立合作网络的人。
{"title":"Making data literacy accessible: A pilot study of academic library and community collaboration for citizen data literacy","authors":"Emily Zoe Mann","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103166","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103166","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article describes an academic librarian's experience of collaborating with community groups, including a public library system and philanthropic health equity group, to provide data literacy to communities outside of academia. The study covers a pilot that took place over the Fall 2024 semester that included four workshops developed to provide the building blocks of data literacy to citizens in Findings are applicable for those wanting to provide education outside of academic libraries to non-traditional audiences, those wishing to provide data literacy outside of a traditional curriculum, and those wanting to build their collaborative networks outside of the library.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 103166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145692593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book club programs in United States academic libraries: A survey 美国大学图书馆读书会项目的调查
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103162
Mary Kamela
In the United States, book clubs are typically associated with the work of public or school librarians, due to their focus on extracurricular programs and recreational reading. However, published case studies and institutional websites indicate that book club programs are also taking place in academic libraries, though there is a lack of broad research investigating this topic further. This paper reports on a summer 2024 survey of US academic library workers who have facilitated book club programming. This study's purposes were to determine the prevalence of book club programming in academic libraries and to identify successes, challenges, and trends in hosting these programs in academic contexts. The results of the survey provide insight into institutional trends, as well as possible benefits of book club programming in academic libraries, such as enhanced collaboration across campus, increased student retention, and a focus on diversity and inclusivity, and challenges, such as funding, staffing, and attendance. The survey results help to identify best practices for hosting engaging and accessible book club programs for various audiences in the academic library.
在美国,读书俱乐部通常与公共或学校图书馆员的工作联系在一起,因为他们关注的是课外活动和娱乐阅读。然而,出版的案例研究和机构网站表明,读书俱乐部项目也在大学图书馆中开展,尽管缺乏对这一主题进行进一步调查的广泛研究。本文报告了2024年夏季对美国高校图书馆工作人员的调查,这些工作人员促进了读书俱乐部的规划。本研究的目的是确定读书俱乐部项目在学术图书馆的普及程度,并确定在学术背景下举办这些项目的成功、挑战和趋势。调查结果提供了对机构趋势的洞察,以及学术图书馆读书俱乐部项目可能带来的好处,例如加强校园内的协作,提高学生保留率,关注多样性和包容性,以及挑战,例如资金,人员配备和出勤率。调查结果有助于确定为学术图书馆的各种受众举办吸引人的、可访问的读书俱乐部项目的最佳实践。
{"title":"Book club programs in United States academic libraries: A survey","authors":"Mary Kamela","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103162","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103162","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the United States, book clubs are typically associated with the work of public or school librarians, due to their focus on extracurricular programs and recreational reading. However, published case studies and institutional websites indicate that book club programs are also taking place in academic libraries, though there is a lack of broad research investigating this topic further. This paper reports on a summer 2024 survey of US academic library workers who have facilitated book club programming. This study's purposes were to determine the prevalence of book club programming in academic libraries and to identify successes, challenges, and trends in hosting these programs in academic contexts. The results of the survey provide insight into institutional trends, as well as possible benefits of book club programming in academic libraries, such as enhanced collaboration across campus, increased student retention, and a focus on diversity and inclusivity, and challenges, such as funding, staffing, and attendance. The survey results help to identify best practices for hosting engaging and accessible book club programs for various audiences in the academic library.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"52 1","pages":"Article 103162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145645942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Data policies in top social science journals: Findings and opportunities for academic libraries 顶级社会科学期刊的数据政策:学术图书馆的发现和机遇
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103163
Jiebei Luo
This paper examines the current landscape of top social science journals and their requirements for research data sharing in author guidelines. It analyzes the presence, strictness, and completeness of data policies across 49 subject categories in the 2023 Journal Citation Reports and discusses their implications for academic library services, including data services, subject liaison work, instruction, and collection development. The study found that 79 % of journals now have a data policy, up from 53.3 % in 2018 (Crosas et al., 2018) reflecting rapid growth in adoption of data policies among top social science journals. The findings also reveal variation in the strictness and completeness of policies across subjects and publishers. Geography and Transportation demonstrate the strictest and most comprehensive policies, while Elsevier and Springer Nature stand out for higher levels of strictness and coverage. Data statements and data sharing receive the strongest emphasis, whereas data citation is less emphasized. More importantly, the study identifies gaps in academic library services to support authors in complying with data policies. Key needs include training on data replication, data citation, and publication support, as well as guidance on copyright and library-licensed data. These areas highlight opportunities for libraries to strengthen instruction, expand training, and enhance curricular support.
本文考察了顶级社会科学期刊的现状及其在作者指南中对研究数据共享的要求。本文分析了2023期刊引文报告中49个学科类别数据政策的存在性、严密性和完整性,并讨论了它们对学术图书馆服务的影响,包括数据服务、学科联络工作、指导和馆藏发展。该研究发现,79%的期刊现在有数据政策,高于2018年的53.3% (Crosas et al., 2018),这反映了顶级社会科学期刊采用数据政策的快速增长。调查结果还揭示了不同主题和出版商在政策的严格性和完整性方面的差异。地理和交通展示了最严格和最全面的政策,而爱思唯尔和b施普林格自然则以更高的严格程度和覆盖范围脱颖而出。数据声明和数据共享是最重要的,而数据引用则不那么重要。更重要的是,该研究确定了学术图书馆服务的差距,以支持作者遵守数据政策。主要需求包括数据复制、数据引用和出版支持方面的培训,以及关于版权和图书馆许可数据的指导。这些领域突出了图书馆加强教学、扩大培训和加强课程支持的机会。
{"title":"Data policies in top social science journals: Findings and opportunities for academic libraries","authors":"Jiebei Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103163","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103163","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the current landscape of top social science journals and their requirements for research data sharing in author guidelines. It analyzes the presence, strictness, and completeness of data policies across 49 subject categories in the 2023 Journal Citation Reports and discusses their implications for academic library services, including data services, subject liaison work, instruction, and collection development. The study found that 79 % of journals now have a data policy, up from 53.3 % in 2018 (<span><span>Crosas et al., 2018</span></span>) reflecting rapid growth in adoption of data policies among top social science journals. The findings also reveal variation in the strictness and completeness of policies across subjects and publishers. Geography and Transportation demonstrate the strictest and most comprehensive policies, while Elsevier and Springer Nature stand out for higher levels of strictness and coverage. Data statements and data sharing receive the strongest emphasis, whereas data citation is less emphasized. More importantly, the study identifies gaps in academic library services to support authors in complying with data policies. Key needs include training on data replication, data citation, and publication support, as well as guidance on copyright and library-licensed data. These areas highlight opportunities for libraries to strengthen instruction, expand training, and enhance curricular support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A qualitative analysis of communication in consortial chat reference 群聚聊天中沟通的定性分析参考
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103159
Kathryn Barrett , Sabina Pagotto
This study aimed to identify relational behaviors and communication practices in an academic, consortial chat reference service, and compared chats in which the operator is paired with a local user and a non-local user. We qualitatively coded a sample of 374 anonymized transcripts in NVivo and developed key assertions about communication behaviors. Overall, use of scripts was high, and personalization was infrequent. Operators used a variety of politeness strategies, such as rapport-building, hedging, setting expectations, and using softening language. We found differences based on institutional affiliation: when dealing with a patron from outside their institution, operators used more scripts, were less likely to introduce themselves to the user, had more instances of repair, used different politeness strategies, impersonalized the speaker more often, and had more incomplete closing rituals. Across the service, operators strengthened relationships with users through self-disclosure and identity moves and weakened relationships through impersonalization. Based on these findings, we recommend that operators increase personalization and self-disclosure, limit the use of scripts, write from the perspective of the user's home library (using terms like us or we, rather than it or they), and complete closing rituals. These are relational facilitators that increase social presence, encourage rapport-building, convey authenticity, and communicate shared identity.
本研究旨在确定在学术、财团聊天参考服务中的关系行为和通信实践,并比较操作员与本地用户和非本地用户配对的聊天。我们在NVivo中对374份匿名转录本样本进行了定性编码,并提出了关于交流行为的关键断言。总的来说,脚本的使用率很高,个性化很少。运营商使用了各种礼貌策略,如建立关系、对冲、设定期望和使用委婉的语言。我们发现了基于机构隶属关系的差异:当与来自机构外的顾客打交道时,经营者使用更多的脚本,不太可能向用户介绍自己,有更多的修复实例,使用不同的礼貌策略,更频繁地使说话人失去个性,并且有更多不完整的结束仪式。在整个服务中,运营商通过自我披露和身份移动加强了与用户的关系,通过非个性化削弱了与用户的关系。基于这些发现,我们建议运营商增加个性化和自我披露,限制脚本的使用,从用户的家庭库的角度写作(使用像我们或我们这样的术语,而不是它或他们),并完成结束仪式。这些都是关系促进者,可以增加社会存在感,鼓励建立融洽关系,传达真实性,并传达共同的身份。
{"title":"A qualitative analysis of communication in consortial chat reference","authors":"Kathryn Barrett ,&nbsp;Sabina Pagotto","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103159","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103159","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to identify relational behaviors and communication practices in an academic, consortial chat reference service, and compared chats in which the operator is paired with a local user and a non-local user. We qualitatively coded a sample of 374 anonymized transcripts in NVivo and developed key assertions about communication behaviors. Overall, use of scripts was high, and personalization was infrequent. Operators used a variety of politeness strategies, such as rapport-building, hedging, setting expectations, and using softening language. We found differences based on institutional affiliation: when dealing with a patron from outside their institution, operators used more scripts, were less likely to introduce themselves to the user, had more instances of repair, used different politeness strategies, impersonalized the speaker more often, and had more incomplete closing rituals. Across the service, operators strengthened relationships with users through self-disclosure and identity moves and weakened relationships through impersonalization. Based on these findings, we recommend that operators increase personalization and self-disclosure, limit the use of scripts, write from the perspective of the user's home library (using terms like us or we, rather than it or they), and complete closing rituals. These are relational facilitators that increase social presence, encourage rapport-building, convey authenticity, and communicate shared identity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145473719","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From crisis to opportunity: Pandemic-driven outreach and the rising influence of academic librarianship journals 从危机到机遇:流行病驱动的外展和学术图书馆期刊影响力的上升
IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103149
Marek Deja
This research aims to assess the coercive effects of the global changes on the impact metrics of research in academic librarianship journals within the related fields of science, namely Library and Information Science (LIS). This is done by conceptualizing the pandemic-related changes as a coercive force in academia that accelerated the new needs for library research and practices, thus improving library research topics recognition in LIS studies. At the same time, the longstanding emphasis on academic library outreach serves as a stable anchor against these coercive pressures in scholarly communication. Using a time-series analysis and bibliometric data covering 2075 articles published from 2014 to 2023 in five core Scopus-indexed journals in academic librarianship, the study applies counterfactual estimation to measure unusual deviations in Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI). Compared with the no-pandemic projections, observed Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) rose statistically significant in Q3 2022 (0.478), and 0.538 in Q1 2023. The cumulative FWCI gain reached an increase of 79.9 % over the expected baseline—signaling a sustained post-crisis elevation rather than a short-lived random spikes. These results can serve as a meaningful, data-driven closure to the COVID discourse and a transition into a new opening for more forward-looking themes.
本研究旨在评估全球变化对相关科学领域,即图书馆与信息科学(LIS)的学术图书馆期刊研究的影响指标的强制性影响。这是通过将与流行病有关的变化概念化为学术界的一种强制性力量来实现的,这种强制性力量加速了对图书馆研究和实践的新需求,从而提高了图书馆研究主题在LIS研究中的认可度。与此同时,长期以来对学术图书馆外展的重视作为一个稳定的锚,在学术交流中对抗这些强制压力。该研究使用时间序列分析和文献计量数据,涵盖了2014年至2023年在学术图书馆领域的5种核心scopus索引期刊上发表的2075篇文章,采用反事实估计来衡量领域加权引用影响(FWCI)的异常偏差。与无大流行预测相比,观察到的田野加权引文影响(FWCI)在2022年第三季度(0.478)和2023年第一季度(0.538)显著上升。FWCI累计增幅达到了预期基线的79.9%,这表明危机后的持续上升,而不是短暂的随机峰值。这些结果可以作为对COVID话语的有意义的、数据驱动的结束,并过渡到更具前瞻性主题的新开端。
{"title":"From crisis to opportunity: Pandemic-driven outreach and the rising influence of academic librarianship journals","authors":"Marek Deja","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103149","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103149","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to assess the coercive effects of the global changes on the impact metrics of research in academic librarianship journals within the related fields of science, namely Library and Information Science (LIS). This is done by conceptualizing the pandemic-related changes as a coercive force in academia that accelerated the new needs for library research and practices, thus improving library research topics recognition in LIS studies. At the same time, the longstanding emphasis on academic library outreach serves as a stable anchor against these coercive pressures in scholarly communication. Using a time-series analysis and bibliometric data covering 2075 articles published from 2014 to 2023 in five core Scopus-indexed journals in academic librarianship, the study applies counterfactual estimation to measure unusual deviations in Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI). Compared with the no-pandemic projections, observed Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) rose statistically significant in Q3 2022 (0.478), and 0.538 in Q1 2023. The cumulative FWCI gain reached an increase of 79.9 % over the expected baseline—signaling a sustained post-crisis elevation rather than a short-lived random spikes. These results can serve as a meaningful, data-driven closure to the COVID discourse and a transition into a new opening for more forward-looking themes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145417629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1