首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Academic Librarianship最新文献

英文 中文
A conceptual analysis of collaboration in information literacy librarianship 信息扫盲图书馆员协作的概念分析
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102934
Amy Andres , Tatiana Usova

Collaboration is a widely used term in academic libraries to describe different types of interaction with campus partners. The library literature presents an extensive history of publications that feature academic library collaboration with discipline faculty in the context of teaching. While the outcomes of teaching librarians' collaborative practices are well documented, the lack of clarity in distinguishing collaboration from other forms of workplace interaction has impeded a comprehensive understanding of teaching librarians' experiences. To improve the understanding of librarians' collaborative practices, and to build a foundation on which further research can be generated, a Pragmatic Utility concept analysis is conducted through an integrative study of peer-reviewed literature. The analysis presents an examination of collaboration between teaching librarians and discipline faculty through five dimensions including definitions, antecedents, attributes, boundaries, and outcomes. An additional dimension, social dynamics, was further identified and applied as a lens for analysis. The conclusion is that collaboration remains a partially immature concept in the library literature, and more studies are needed to establish a clear definition and a solid theoretical framework to guide professional research forward.

合作是学术图书馆广泛使用的一个术语,用来描述与校园合作伙伴的不同类型的互动。图书馆文献中有大量的出版物介绍了学术图书馆与学科教师在教学方面的合作。虽然教学图书馆员的合作实践成果有据可查,但在区分合作与其他形式的工作场所互动方面缺乏明确性,这阻碍了对教学图书馆员经验的全面了解。为了加深对图书馆员合作实践的理解,并为进一步的研究奠定基础,我们通过对同行评议文献的综合研究,进行了实用工具概念分析。该分析通过定义、前因、属性、边界和结果等五个维度对教学图书馆员与学科教师之间的合作进行了研究。此外,还进一步确定了社会动态这一维度,并将其作为分析的视角。结论是,在图书馆文献中,合作仍然是一个部分不成熟的概念,需要更多的研究来建立一个明确的定义和坚实的理论框架,以指导专业研究向前发展。
{"title":"A conceptual analysis of collaboration in information literacy librarianship","authors":"Amy Andres ,&nbsp;Tatiana Usova","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102934","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102934","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Collaboration is a widely used term in academic libraries to describe different types of interaction with campus partners. The library literature presents an extensive history of publications that feature academic library collaboration with discipline faculty in the context of teaching. While the outcomes of teaching librarians' collaborative practices are well documented, the lack of clarity in distinguishing collaboration from other forms of workplace interaction has impeded a comprehensive understanding of teaching librarians' experiences. To improve the understanding of librarians' collaborative practices, and to build a foundation on which further research can be generated, a Pragmatic Utility concept analysis is conducted through an integrative study of peer-reviewed literature. The analysis presents an examination of collaboration between teaching librarians and discipline faculty through five dimensions including <em>definitions, antecedents, attributes, boundaries, and outcomes</em>. An additional dimension, <em>social dynamics</em>, was further identified and applied as a lens for analysis. The conclusion is that collaboration remains a partially immature concept in the library literature, and more studies are needed to establish a clear definition and a solid theoretical framework to guide professional research forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141960913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing information, media and data literacy in academic libraries: Approaches and challenges in the research literature on the topic 评估学术图书馆的信息、媒体和数据素养:相关研究文献中的方法和挑战
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102920
Maria Pinto , Javier Garcia-Marco , David Caballero , Ramón Manso , Alejandro Uribe , Carmen Gomez

A review of the research literature on the assessment of information, media, and data literacy in academic libraries has been carried out with the intention of learning about the main approaches taken; the assessment tools, criteria, and indicators used; and the main challenges for the future. To this end, 60 relevant records were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus after being filtered according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) model. A content analysis of the articles was then carried out using a detailed form based on the objectives, methodology, results, conclusions, and recommendations model in relation to the current aims. Literacy assessment has been conducted primarily in information literacy. Research in anglophone countries and Spain stands out. Much of it relates to academic libraries as a whole, although there are also numerous studies focused on a field of use, primarily health, STEM, and social sciences. Among the most commonly used methods of analysis, case studies stand out, followed by descriptive, exploratory, experimental, and comparative studies; literature reviews; and content analysis. The results are positive, and assessment helps improve programs and demonstrate libraries' impact on student learning. Despite its importance, media literacy assessment is still an emerging field, and data literacy assessment is still largely a work in progress. Academic libraries need to integrate new types of literacy and emerging challenges such as open data, open science, and generative artificial intelligence into the comprehensive framework of information literacy and conduct a systematic assessment of their training programs and activities.

我们对有关学术图书馆信息、媒体和数据素养评估的研究文献进行了综述,旨在了解所采取的主要方法;所使用的评估工具、标准和指标;以及未来面临的主要挑战。为此,根据系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)模式进行筛选后,从科学网核心藏书和 Scopus 中检索了 60 条相关记录。然后,根据与当前目标相关的目标、方法、结果、结论和建议模式,使用详细表格对文章进行了内容分析。扫盲评估主要是在信息扫盲方面进行的。英语国家和西班牙的研究尤为突出。尽管也有许多研究侧重于某个使用领域,主要是卫生、科技、教育、工程和社 会科学领域,但大部分研究与整个学术图书馆有关。在最常用的分析方法中,案例研究最为突出,其次是描述性、探索性、实验性和比较研究;文献综述;以及内容分析。评估的结果是积极的,评估有助于改进计划,展示图书馆对学生学习的影响。尽管媒体素养评估很重要,但它仍是一个新兴领域,数据素养评估在很大程度上仍在进行中。学术图书馆需要将新型素养以及开放数据、开放科学和生成式人工智能等新兴挑战纳入信息素养的综合框架,并对其培训计划和活动进行系统评估。
{"title":"Assessing information, media and data literacy in academic libraries: Approaches and challenges in the research literature on the topic","authors":"Maria Pinto ,&nbsp;Javier Garcia-Marco ,&nbsp;David Caballero ,&nbsp;Ramón Manso ,&nbsp;Alejandro Uribe ,&nbsp;Carmen Gomez","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102920","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102920","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A review of the research literature on the assessment of information, media, and data literacy in academic libraries has been carried out with the intention of learning about the main approaches taken; the assessment tools, criteria, and indicators used; and the main challenges for the future. To this end, 60 relevant records were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus after being filtered according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) model. A content analysis of the articles was then carried out using a detailed form based on the objectives, methodology, results, conclusions, and recommendations model in relation to the current aims. Literacy assessment has been conducted primarily in information literacy. Research in anglophone countries and Spain stands out. Much of it relates to academic libraries as a whole, although there are also numerous studies focused on a field of use, primarily health, STEM, and social sciences. Among the most commonly used methods of analysis, case studies stand out, followed by descriptive, exploratory, experimental, and comparative studies; literature reviews; and content analysis. The results are positive, and assessment helps improve programs and demonstrate libraries' impact on student learning. Despite its importance, media literacy assessment is still an emerging field, and data literacy assessment is still largely a work in progress. Academic libraries need to integrate new types of literacy and emerging challenges such as open data, open science, and generative artificial intelligence into the comprehensive framework of information literacy and conduct a systematic assessment of their training programs and activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102920"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000818/pdfft?md5=dfa6abf21a3dca11293ca0c7afa2b2fd&pid=1-s2.0-S0099133324000818-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141960984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Considerations and challenges for collecting digital games in academic libraries 学术图书馆收集数字游戏的考虑因素和挑战
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102931
Colin Post, Jerry Reed, Chloe Lanham

Academic libraries face a serious obstacle that will inhibit their ability to continue growing robust video game collections. The gaming industry is increasingly moving toward the digital distribution of games, making games available as digital downloads licensed to single end-user consumers from online storefronts rather than releasing games on physical media like discs or cartridges. Libraries have adapted to similar shifts in the distribution of books and audiovisual materials largely by licensing content from ebook and digital video vendors, but there are currently no such vendors or platforms set up to license digital games to libraries in ways comparable to these other kinds of electronic resources. This paper reports on findings from interviews with librarians at 13 academic libraries in the US who are beginning to explore digital game collecting efforts, presenting some of the key considerations for how libraries might approach digital game licenses as well as the major challenges, issues, and factors that will influence digital game collecting. While digital game collecting will require engagement with game publishers and other stakeholders, this research seeks to establish a shared understanding among academic librarians of their own needs and priorities for this emerging collecting area.

学术图书馆面临着一个严重的障碍,这将阻碍它们继续扩大电子游戏藏书量的能力。游戏产业正越来越多地转向游戏的数字发行,将游戏作为数字下载授权给在线店面的单个最终用户消费者,而不是以光盘或盒式磁带等物理介质发行游戏。图书馆主要通过从电子书和数字视频供应商那里获得内容授权来适应图书和音像资料发行方面的类似转变,但目前还没有这样的供应商或平台以类似于其他种类电子资源的方式向图书馆提供数字游戏授权。本文报告了对美国 13 家学术图书馆馆员的访谈结果,这些图书馆馆员正开始探索数字游戏收藏工作,本文介绍了图书馆如何获得数字游戏授权的一些主要考虑因素,以及影响数字游戏收藏的主要挑战、问题和因素。虽然数字游戏收藏需要游戏出版商和其他利益相关者的参与,但本研究旨在让学术图书馆员对这一新兴收藏领域的自身需求和优先事项达成共识。
{"title":"Considerations and challenges for collecting digital games in academic libraries","authors":"Colin Post,&nbsp;Jerry Reed,&nbsp;Chloe Lanham","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102931","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102931","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Academic libraries face a serious obstacle that will inhibit their ability to continue growing robust video game collections. The gaming industry is increasingly moving toward the digital distribution of games, making games available as digital downloads licensed to single end-user consumers from online storefronts rather than releasing games on physical media like discs or cartridges. Libraries have adapted to similar shifts in the distribution of books and audiovisual materials largely by licensing content from ebook and digital video vendors, but there are currently no such vendors or platforms set up to license digital games to libraries in ways comparable to these other kinds of electronic resources. This paper reports on findings from interviews with librarians at 13 academic libraries in the US who are beginning to explore digital game collecting efforts, presenting some of the key considerations for how libraries might approach digital game licenses as well as the major challenges, issues, and factors that will influence digital game collecting. While digital game collecting will require engagement with game publishers and other stakeholders, this research seeks to establish a shared understanding among academic librarians of their own needs and priorities for this emerging collecting area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102931"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141954429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating projects in academic libraries: A scoping review of project management applications 学术图书馆的项目导航:项目管理应用范围审查
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102929
Eric Prosser

Despite the prevalence of project-based work in academic libraries, there is a notable variance among academic libraries in their application of formal project management methods. This scoping review examines peer-reviewed academic literature to uncover examples of formal project management methods, techniques, and tools being utilized in academic libraries in order to identify broader trends about the methodologies used, the settings in which they are applied, and the successes or challenges the libraries have experienced. The study concludes with recommendations for future research and a call for a more rigorous integration of project management training in library science education, to better prepare librarians for the increasingly project-oriented nature of library work.

尽管学术图书馆中以项目为基础的工作非常普遍,但学术图书馆在应用正式项目管理方法方面却存在着明显的差异。本范围审查研究了同行评议的学术文献,揭示了学术图书馆正在使用的正式项目管理方法、技术和工具的实例,以确定所使用的方法、应用的环境以及图书馆所经历的成功或挑战方面的更广泛趋势。研究最后对未来研究提出了建议,并呼吁在图书馆学教育中更严格地纳入项目管理培训,使图书馆员更好地为日益以项目为导向的图书馆工作做好准备。
{"title":"Navigating projects in academic libraries: A scoping review of project management applications","authors":"Eric Prosser","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102929","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102929","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the prevalence of project-based work in academic libraries, there is a notable variance among academic libraries in their application of formal project management methods. This scoping review examines peer-reviewed academic literature to uncover examples of formal project management methods, techniques, and tools being utilized in academic libraries in order to identify broader trends about the methodologies used, the settings in which they are applied, and the successes or challenges the libraries have experienced. The study concludes with recommendations for future research and a call for a more rigorous integration of project management training in library science education, to better prepare librarians for the increasingly project-oriented nature of library work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How do university libraries contribute to the research process? 大学图书馆如何促进研究进程?
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102930
Soledad Alfaro Jimenez , Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent , Rocío de la Torre

This study uncovers how university libraries contribute to research processes conducted at universities. To do so, a bibliometric and systematic analysis of the literature is presented. The review shows that the line of research on university libraries and their contribution to research is a fragmented field in constant development, with a marked tendency toward the use of qualitative methods and case studies. The original value of this work lies in the creation of a thematic map and a thematic-temporal evolutionary scheme that allows us to understand the main perspectives from which the role of libraries in supporting research activities has been approached. Three time periods that reflect different terms in the conceptualisation of the library are characterised. The study concludes with recommendations, including indications for future research that should consider larger and more diverse samples, involve researchers as the object of study and consider applying quantitative or mixed methods.

本研究揭示了大学图书馆如何促进大学的研究进程。为此,我们对文献进行了文献计量和系统分析。综述显示,关于大学图书馆及其对研究的贡献的研究是一个不断发展的零散领域,明显倾向于使用定性方法和案例研究。这项工作的原始价值在于创建了一个主题地图和一个主题-时间演变方案,使我们能够从主要角度了解图书馆在支持研究活动中的作用。三个时期反映了图书馆概念化的不同术语。研究最后提出了一些建议,包括未来的研究应考虑更大、更多样化的样本,将研究人员作为研究对象,并考虑采用定量或混合方法。
{"title":"How do university libraries contribute to the research process?","authors":"Soledad Alfaro Jimenez ,&nbsp;Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent ,&nbsp;Rocío de la Torre","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102930","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102930","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study uncovers how university libraries contribute to research processes conducted at universities. To do so, a bibliometric and systematic analysis of the literature is presented. The review shows that the line of research on university libraries and their contribution to research is a fragmented field in constant development, with a marked tendency toward the use of qualitative methods and case studies. The original value of this work lies in the creation of a thematic map and a thematic-temporal evolutionary scheme that allows us to understand the main perspectives from which the role of libraries in supporting research activities has been approached. Three time periods that reflect different terms in the conceptualisation of the library are characterised. The study concludes with recommendations, including indications for future research that should consider larger and more diverse samples, involve researchers as the object of study and consider applying quantitative or mixed methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Building a community of practice for instruction librarians: Programmatic elements and strategies for implementation 为指导图书馆员建立实践社区:计划要素和实施策略
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102928
Sarah F. Sahn, Karleigh Riesen

A community of practice for instruction librarians is essential to ongoing development of pedagogical knowledge, fostering community, and cultivating meaningful teaching practices. This article describes the development of a community of practice for new and experienced instruction librarians to help them grow in their teaching practice. Elements explored throughout this article include collaborative peer mentorship, developing a reflective practice, and support for the coordinator of instruction leading these efforts. A replicable model for effective implementation at other institutions is detailed throughout the article.

教学图书馆员的实践社区对于不断发展教学知识、促进社区发展和培养有意义的教学实践至关重要。本文介绍了如何为新老指导图书馆员建立实践社区,帮助他们在教学实践中成长。本文所探讨的要素包括协作性同伴指导、发展反思性实践以及对领导这些工作的教学协调员的支持。文章详细介绍了在其他机构有效实施的可复制模式。
{"title":"Building a community of practice for instruction librarians: Programmatic elements and strategies for implementation","authors":"Sarah F. Sahn,&nbsp;Karleigh Riesen","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102928","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102928","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A community of practice for instruction librarians is essential to ongoing development of pedagogical knowledge, fostering community, and cultivating meaningful teaching practices. This article describes the development of a community of practice for new and experienced instruction librarians to help them grow in their teaching practice. Elements explored throughout this article include collaborative peer mentorship, developing a reflective practice, and support for the coordinator of instruction leading these efforts. A replicable model for effective implementation at other institutions is detailed throughout the article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141636732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What drives the adoption of data analytics at Australian university libraries in the perspective of UTAUT2? 从UTAUT2的角度看,是什么推动了澳大利亚大学图书馆采用数据分析技术?
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102927
Prodip Roy

This study investigates the adoption of data analytics in Australian university libraries from the UTAUT2 perspective, focusing on the factors that influence library professionals' acceptance of analytics. As technology advances, data has become a valuable resource, and the emergence of analytics is often considered a recent development driven by accessible computing power. However, there is a lack of comprehensive research on adopting analytics in Australian university libraries, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of the factors that influence university library professionals’' perceptions of adopting analytics. This research addresses the main question: What factors drive the adoption of data analytics in Australian university libraries? This qualitative study employs a single case study approach with multiple sites involving 16 university libraries and 25 participants. Data collection methods included document analysis and semi-structured interviews with university librarians and analytics experts. The results show that all UTAUT2 constructs - performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit - influence librarians' attitudes and motivations towards adopting analytics applications. Additionally, this study reveals additional factors beyond the original UTAUT2 model, including the absence of data analytics in LIS education curriculums, algorithm training, and data privacy concerns. The study identifies various benefits of analytics adoption in university libraries, such as enhanced collection development planning, insights into user behaviour, improved financial management, and demonstrating library value. However, challenges like skill shortages, complex IT configurations, and privacy legislation must be addressed to effectively implement data analytics. The findings contribute to our understanding of user acceptance of analytics in university libraries, providing valuable insights for library administrators and analytics vendors. By applying the UTAUT2 model, this research enriches our knowledge of technology adoption in the context of university libraries' analytics.

本研究从UTAUT2的角度调查了澳大利亚大学图书馆采用数据分析的情况,重点关注影响图书馆专业人员接受分析的因素。随着技术的进步,数据已成为一种宝贵的资源,而分析技术的出现通常被认为是由可获得的计算能力推动的最新发展。然而,目前缺乏对澳大利亚大学图书馆采用分析技术的全面研究,这凸显了深入了解影响大学图书馆专业人员对采用分析技术的看法的因素的必要性。本研究探讨的主要问题是哪些因素推动了澳大利亚大学图书馆采用数据分析技术?本定性研究采用单一案例研究方法,涉及 16 所大学图书馆和 25 名参与者。数据收集方法包括文档分析以及对大学图书馆员和分析专家的半结构化访谈。研究结果表明,UTAUT2 的所有建构--绩效预期、努力预期、社会影响、便利条件、享乐动机、价格价值和习惯--都会影响图书馆员采用分析应用程序的态度和动机。此外,本研究还揭示了UTAUT2 原始模型之外的其他因素,包括图书情报学教育课程中数据分析的缺失、算法培训和数据隐私问题。研究指出了大学图书馆采用分析技术的各种益处,如加强馆藏发展规划、洞察用户行为、改善财务管理和展示图书馆价值。然而,要有效实施数据分析,必须应对技能短缺、复杂的 IT 配置和隐私立法等挑战。研究结果有助于我们了解用户对大学图书馆分析技术的接受程度,为图书馆管理人员和分析技术供应商提供有价值的见解。通过应用UTAUT2 模型,本研究丰富了我们对大学图书馆分析技术采用情况的了解。
{"title":"What drives the adoption of data analytics at Australian university libraries in the perspective of UTAUT2?","authors":"Prodip Roy","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102927","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102927","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the adoption of data analytics in Australian university libraries from the UTAUT2 perspective, focusing on the factors that influence library professionals' acceptance of analytics. As technology advances, data has become a valuable resource, and the emergence of analytics is often considered a recent development driven by accessible computing power. However, there is a lack of comprehensive research on adopting analytics in Australian university libraries, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of the factors that influence university library professionals’' perceptions of adopting analytics. This research addresses the main question: What factors drive the adoption of data analytics in Australian university libraries? This qualitative study employs a single case study approach with multiple sites involving 16 university libraries and 25 participants. Data collection methods included document analysis and semi-structured interviews with university librarians and analytics experts. The results show that all UTAUT2 constructs - performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, price value, and habit - influence librarians' attitudes and motivations towards adopting analytics applications. Additionally, this study reveals additional factors beyond the original UTAUT2 model, including the absence of data analytics in LIS education curriculums, algorithm training, and data privacy concerns. The study identifies various benefits of analytics adoption in university libraries, such as enhanced collection development planning, insights into user behaviour, improved financial management, and demonstrating library value. However, challenges like skill shortages, complex IT configurations, and privacy legislation must be addressed to effectively implement data analytics. The findings contribute to our understanding of user acceptance of analytics in university libraries, providing valuable insights for library administrators and analytics vendors. By applying the UTAUT2 model, this research enriches our knowledge of technology adoption in the context of university libraries' analytics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102927"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000880/pdfft?md5=b5faf0f6d733606d0f8864c90156263e&pid=1-s2.0-S0099133324000880-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141630070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unveiling the feed: Academic libraries' instagram unpacked 揭开信息源的面纱:解读学术图书馆的 instagram
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102924
Ioannis Drivas, Eftichia Vraimaki

In the ever-evolving social media landscape, Instagram has transcended from a mere image-sharing platform to a dynamic space for academic libraries to engage with their communities. Following the increased utilization of this platform, several studies have tried to unravel the interplay between nuanced content aspects and follower engagement, but the results are cursory and contradicting. Aiming to address these shortcomings, we conducted an in-depth analysis of 1681 posts from 120 academic libraries' Instagram profiles worldwide to explore the following: content volume and posting frequency; qualitative content aspects such as post categories, characters length, hashtags usage, emojis frequency, and post types; and possible correlations between these content aspects and follower post interaction rates. Our findings uncovered notable disparities in interaction rates among 14 distinct post categories, with content structure characteristics showing minimal influence on these rates. By shedding light on the association between aspects of content structure and follower interaction, the study contributes to the development and optimization of academic libraries' social media strategy, policy redefinition, staff knowledge and practical skills improvement to manage social media, while also opening new research avenues in Instagram utilization in the academic library context.

在不断发展的社交媒体领域,Instagram 已从一个单纯的图片分享平台转变为学术图书馆与其社区互动的动态空间。随着该平台使用率的提高,一些研究试图揭示细微内容方面与粉丝参与之间的相互作用,但研究结果粗略且相互矛盾。为了弥补这些不足,我们对全球 120 家学术图书馆的 Instagram 资料中的 1681 篇帖子进行了深入分析,以探索以下内容:内容数量和发布频率;帖子类别、字符长度、标签使用、表情符号频率和帖子类型等定性内容方面;以及这些内容方面与追随者帖子互动率之间可能存在的相关性。我们的研究结果发现,在 14 个不同的帖子类别中,互动率存在明显差异,而内容结构特征对互动率的影响微乎其微。通过揭示内容结构与粉丝互动之间的关联,本研究有助于制定和优化学术图书馆的社交媒体战略、重新定义政策、提高员工管理社交媒体的知识和实践技能,同时也为学术图书馆在Instagram应用方面开辟了新的研究途径。
{"title":"Unveiling the feed: Academic libraries' instagram unpacked","authors":"Ioannis Drivas,&nbsp;Eftichia Vraimaki","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102924","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the ever-evolving social media landscape, Instagram has transcended from a mere image-sharing platform to a dynamic space for academic libraries to engage with their communities. Following the increased utilization of this platform, several studies have tried to unravel the interplay between nuanced content aspects and follower engagement, but the results are cursory and contradicting. Aiming to address these shortcomings, we conducted an in-depth analysis of 1681 posts from 120 academic libraries' Instagram profiles worldwide to explore the following: content volume and posting frequency; qualitative content aspects such as post categories, characters length, hashtags usage, emojis frequency, and post types; and possible correlations between these content aspects and follower post interaction rates. Our findings uncovered notable disparities in interaction rates among 14 distinct post categories, with content structure characteristics showing minimal influence on these rates. By shedding light on the association between aspects of content structure and follower interaction, the study contributes to the development and optimization of academic libraries' social media strategy, policy redefinition, staff knowledge and practical skills improvement to manage social media, while also opening new research avenues in Instagram utilization in the academic library context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141583062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
University students' knowledge of potentially predatory journals: A focus group analysis 大学生对潜在掠夺性期刊的了解:焦点小组分析
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102926
H. Rainer Schira , Chris Hurst

In our previous study on potentially predatory journal (PPJ) use by undergraduate students, we found that 0.34 % of their journal citations were from PPJ. We could not determine where students found them, or if they knew they used them, and no similar study has been published. In three focus groups we asked twelve students about their research habits, how they choose articles for their papers, and their knowledge about peer review, Open Access (OA), and PPJ. An analysis of their bibliographies showed that none of them used PPJ in their assignments. Using a mixed methods approach and classical content analysis, we found that they search library-linked databases and Google Scholar, use critical thinking skills to choose articles, place importance on peer review, know little about OA and less about PPJ, and expect quality control for information accessed through the library.

在我们之前关于本科生使用潜在掠夺性期刊(PPJ)的研究中,我们发现他们的期刊引用中有 0.34% 来自 PPJ。我们无法确定学生是从哪里找到这些期刊的,也不知道他们是否知道自己使用了这些期刊,而且也没有类似的研究发表过。在三个焦点小组中,我们向十二名学生询问了他们的研究习惯、如何为论文选择文章,以及他们对同行评审、开放存取(OA)和PPJ的了解。对他们的参考书目进行的分析表明,他们都没有在作业中使用 PPJ。采用混合方法和经典内容分析法,我们发现他们搜索图书馆链接数据库和谷歌学术,使用批判性思维技巧选择文章,重视同行评议,对开放存取知之甚少,对PPJ知之甚少,并期望通过图书馆获取的信息得到质量控制。
{"title":"University students' knowledge of potentially predatory journals: A focus group analysis","authors":"H. Rainer Schira ,&nbsp;Chris Hurst","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102926","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102926","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In our previous study on potentially predatory journal (PPJ) use by undergraduate students, we found that 0.34 % of their journal citations were from PPJ. We could not determine where students found them, or if they knew they used them, and no similar study has been published. In three focus groups we asked twelve students about their research habits, how they choose articles for their papers, and their knowledge about peer review, Open Access (OA), and PPJ. An analysis of their bibliographies showed that none of them used PPJ in their assignments. Using a mixed methods approach and classical content analysis, we found that they search library-linked databases and Google Scholar, use critical thinking skills to choose articles, place importance on peer review, know little about OA and less about PPJ, and expect quality control for information accessed through the library.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102926"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133324000879/pdfft?md5=ff1ce32ce5f921f1ba48f3f07d30f37a&pid=1-s2.0-S0099133324000879-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141540664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Humor in the academic library classroom: A synthesis of scholarship & new implications for librarians 学术图书馆课堂中的幽默:学术综述及对图书馆员的新启示
IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102923
Jessica Swaringen, Kevin J. Reagan

While humor's use in the higher education classroom has been widely studied, research on the use, implications, and impact of humor rarely include instruction librarians. In addition to the already subjective nature of humor, factors such as gender and library anxiety complicate the ways in which students might perceive a librarian's humor. Accordingly, opportunities for further research on librarians' use of humor are abundant. By synthesizing and contextualizing existing instructional humor research, this article seeks to highlight research opportunities on the use of humor among instruction librarians.

虽然幽默在高等教育课堂中的应用已被广泛研究,但有关幽默的使用、意义和影响的研究却很少包括指导图书馆员。除了幽默的主观性之外,性别和图书馆焦虑等因素也使学生对图书馆员幽默的感知变得更加复杂。因此,进一步研究图书馆员使用幽默的机会非常多。通过对现有的教学幽默研究进行归纳和背景分析,本文试图强调教学图书馆员使用幽默的研究机会。
{"title":"Humor in the academic library classroom: A synthesis of scholarship & new implications for librarians","authors":"Jessica Swaringen,&nbsp;Kevin J. Reagan","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102923","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While humor's use in the higher education classroom has been widely studied, research on the use, implications, and impact of humor rarely include instruction librarians. In addition to the already subjective nature of humor, factors such as gender and library anxiety complicate the ways in which students might perceive a librarian's humor. Accordingly, opportunities for further research on librarians' use of humor are abundant. By synthesizing and contextualizing existing instructional humor research, this article seeks to highlight research opportunities on the use of humor among instruction librarians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 102923"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141540670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1