Objective: People with disabilities continue to cope with high levels of stress, such as disability-related stress and sociopolitical stress. Helping people with disabilities engage in regular physical activity to improve health and reduce stress is more important than ever. This study evaluated demographic covariates, the health action process approach (HAPA) constructs (action self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, risk perception, intention/commitment, maintenance and recovery self-efficacy, and action and coping planning), and positive person-environment variables (autonomous motivation, resilience, hope, and social support) as motivators for regular physical activity in a sample of people with disabilities.
Methods: People with disabilities participated in an online study (N = 266). Hierarchical regression analysis was used to determine the incremental variance in physical activity scores accounted for by variables in the regression model.
Results: Demographic covariates, HAPA constructs, and positive person-environment variables accounted for 38% of the total variance in physical activity scores (a large effect size). Low income was a risk factor that significantly and negatively associated with regular physical activity, while self-efficacy, action and coping planning, and social support were significantly and positively associated with reular physical activity after controlling for other variables. Autonomous motivation, resilience, and hope were significantly associated with regular physical activity at the zero-order correlation level, but not significant in the regression model.
Conclusions: This study provides strong empirical support for the HAPA constructs, which can be used to inform the development of theory-driven and empirically supported physical activity interventions to improve health, stress management, and well-being of people with disabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The health action process approach to promote regular physical activity among people with disabilities: A hierarchical regression analysis.","authors":"Jia Rung Wu, Fong Chan, Nicole Ditchman","doi":"10.1037/rep0000589","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000589","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People with disabilities continue to cope with high levels of stress, such as disability-related stress and sociopolitical stress. Helping people with disabilities engage in regular physical activity to improve health and reduce stress is more important than ever. This study evaluated demographic covariates, the health action process approach (HAPA) constructs (action self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, risk perception, intention/commitment, maintenance and recovery self-efficacy, and action and coping planning), and positive person-environment variables (autonomous motivation, resilience, hope, and social support) as motivators for regular physical activity in a sample of people with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with disabilities participated in an online study (<i>N</i> = 266). Hierarchical regression analysis was used to determine the incremental variance in physical activity scores accounted for by variables in the regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic covariates, HAPA constructs, and positive person-environment variables accounted for 38% of the total variance in physical activity scores (a large effect size). Low income was a risk factor that significantly and negatively associated with regular physical activity, while self-efficacy, action and coping planning, and social support were significantly and positively associated with reular physical activity after controlling for other variables. Autonomous motivation, resilience, and hope were significantly associated with regular physical activity at the zero-order correlation level, but not significant in the regression model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides strong empirical support for the HAPA constructs, which can be used to inform the development of theory-driven and empirically supported physical activity interventions to improve health, stress management, and well-being of people with disabilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose/objective: There is a significant gap in the literature with regards to the synthesis of qualitative research that explores the parenting experiences of parents with physical disabilities. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence regarding the experiences of parents with acquired and congenital physical disabilities.
Research method/design: This article presents a thematic synthesis of qualitative research carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were identified through searches of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and backward snowballing. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist was used as a quality assessment tool.
Results: Eleven articles were included in this review, and all were deemed to be high quality. Seven themes were identified: stigmatization and the need to prove competence as a parent; feeling underrepresented as a parent with a physical disability; environmental limitations; experiences of accessing support; using skills and strategies to fulfill parenting role; children's roles and reactions, and changes as they grow; and safety, wellness, and health when parenting with a physical disability.
Conclusions/implications: The findings emphasize the adaptability and resourcefulness of parents with physical disabilities in navigating environments that can be unsupportive, while continuing to prioritize their children's safety and well-being. The need for community peer-support groups and health care professionals who can provide emotional support, further public education with regards to the capabilities of parents with physical disabilities, prioritization of accessibility in public and private spaces, and the development of adapted childcare equipment, were all highlighted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:在对探讨肢体残疾父母养育子女经验的定性研究进行综述方面,文献资料存在很大的空白。本系统性综述旨在综合有关后天性和先天性肢体残疾父母经验的证据:本文是根据《系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)指南对定性研究进行的专题综述。通过检索《护理及相关健康文献累积索引》(Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库以及后向 "滚雪球 "法来确定研究。采用批判性评价技能计划定性检查表作为质量评估工具:本综述共收录了 11 篇文章,所有文章均被视为高质量文章。确定了七个主题:作为父母的耻辱感和证明能力的需要;作为身体残疾父母的不足感;环境限制;获得支持的经历;使用技能和策略履行养育子女的职责;子女的角色和反应,以及他们成长过程中的变化;身体残疾父母的安全、健康和保健:研究结果强调了肢体残疾父母的适应能力和机智,他们可以在不支持的环境中游刃有余,同时继续优先考虑子女的安全和福祉。研究强调了社区同伴支持团体和医疗保健专业人员提供情感支持的必要性,进一步开展有关肢体残疾父母能力的公众教育,优先考虑公共和私人空间的无障碍环境,以及开发适应性儿童保育设备。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,版权所有。)
{"title":"Being a parent with a physical disability: A systematic review.","authors":"Amanda Dunne, Christian Ryan","doi":"10.1037/rep0000590","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000590","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>There is a significant gap in the literature with regards to the synthesis of qualitative research that explores the parenting experiences of parents with physical disabilities. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence regarding the experiences of parents with acquired and congenital physical disabilities.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>This article presents a thematic synthesis of qualitative research carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were identified through searches of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases and backward snowballing. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist was used as a quality assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven articles were included in this review, and all were deemed to be high quality. Seven themes were identified: stigmatization and the need to prove competence as a parent; feeling underrepresented as a parent with a physical disability; environmental limitations; experiences of accessing support; using skills and strategies to fulfill parenting role; children's roles and reactions, and changes as they grow; and safety, wellness, and health when parenting with a physical disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>The findings emphasize the adaptability and resourcefulness of parents with physical disabilities in navigating environments that can be unsupportive, while continuing to prioritize their children's safety and well-being. The need for community peer-support groups and health care professionals who can provide emotional support, further public education with regards to the capabilities of parents with physical disabilities, prioritization of accessibility in public and private spaces, and the development of adapted childcare equipment, were all highlighted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarah M Bannon, Natalia Bernal Fernández, Holly Carrington, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Eric Watson
Purpose/objective: Brain injuries are often "invisible" injuries that can have lifelong consequences including changes in identity, functional independence, relationships, and reduced participation in daily activities. Survivors of brain injury experience stigma and challenges related to the misattribution of symptoms to other causes that are significant barriers to recovery and adjustment. Changes in policy and other large-scale interventions are cited as an underexplored, yet critical path to reducing the impact of brain injury. The present study sought to comprehensively characterize the impact of one such initiative-Brain Injury Identification Cards-among survivors to further refine the resource.
Research method/design: In this cross-sectional qualitative focus group study, we recruited 16 individuals with a history of brain injury via email listservs of individuals who registered for a Brain Injury Identification Card. We used rapid data analysis with a hybrid of deductive and inductive analytic strategies to identify themes within a priori domains.
Results: We extracted themes within four domains: (a) process and reasons for obtaining cards; (b) overall impressions of the cards; (c) uses of the cards; and (d) feedback and proposed changes. Participants described the process of obtaining cards as straightforward and shared wide-ranging benefits across domains, including improving survivors' sense of safety, self-advocacy, and ability to participate in daily activities.
Conclusions/implications: Findings highlight the utility of Brain Injury Identification Cards for improving community understanding of brain injury symptoms and how injury-related challenges may manifest in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:脑损伤通常是一种 "隐形 "伤害,可造成终生后果,包括身份、功能独立性、人际关系的改变以及参与日常活动的减少。脑损伤幸存者会因症状被错误归因于其他原因而蒙受耻辱和挑战,这些都是康复和适应的重大障碍。政策变化和其他大规模干预措施被认为是减少脑损伤影响的一条尚未充分探索但却至关重要的途径。本研究试图全面描述脑损伤识别卡这一举措对幸存者的影响,以进一步完善这一资源:在这项横断面定性焦点小组研究中,我们通过注册脑损伤识别卡的个人电子邮件列表招募了 16 名有脑损伤病史的人。我们采用演绎和归纳混合分析策略进行快速数据分析,以确定先验领域内的主题:我们提取了四个领域内的主题:(a) 获得识别卡的过程和原因;(b) 对识别卡的总体印象;(c) 识别卡的用途;(d) 反馈和修改建议。参与者认为获得脑识别卡的过程简单明了,并分享了各领域的广泛益处,包括提高幸存者的安全感、自我主张和参与日常活动的能力:研究结果凸显了脑损伤识别卡在增进社区对脑损伤症状以及日常生活中与损伤相关的挑战的了解方面的作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"Comprehensive feedback on user experiences with brain injury identification cards.","authors":"Sarah M Bannon, Natalia Bernal Fernández, Holly Carrington, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Eric Watson","doi":"10.1037/rep0000586","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000586","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>Brain injuries are often \"invisible\" injuries that can have lifelong consequences including changes in identity, functional independence, relationships, and reduced participation in daily activities. Survivors of brain injury experience stigma and challenges related to the misattribution of symptoms to other causes that are significant barriers to recovery and adjustment. Changes in policy and other large-scale interventions are cited as an underexplored, yet critical path to reducing the impact of brain injury. The present study sought to comprehensively characterize the impact of one such initiative-Brain Injury Identification Cards-among survivors to further refine the resource.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>In this cross-sectional qualitative focus group study, we recruited 16 individuals with a history of brain injury via email listservs of individuals who registered for a Brain Injury Identification Card. We used rapid data analysis with a hybrid of deductive and inductive analytic strategies to identify themes within a priori domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We extracted themes within four domains: (a) process and reasons for obtaining cards; (b) overall impressions of the cards; (c) uses of the cards; and (d) feedback and proposed changes. Participants described the process of obtaining cards as straightforward and shared wide-ranging benefits across domains, including improving survivors' sense of safety, self-advocacy, and ability to participate in daily activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Findings highlight the utility of Brain Injury Identification Cards for improving community understanding of brain injury symptoms and how injury-related challenges may manifest in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose/objective: People with disabilities often achieve lower educational attainments and face worse employment outcomes compared to the general population, a disparity partially due to the insufficient development of self-advocacy skills in academic and professional environments where targeted interventions are limited. This study designed and evaluated a 6-week self-advocacy program (SAP) enhanced with solution-focused brief therapy techniques for college students with disabilities (SWDs).
Research method/design: A program evaluation on process and outcomes was conducted using a pilot randomized controlled trial with college SWD (n = 28). Process evaluations included feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability, whereas the preliminary impact was determined by comparing the outcome assessments of SAP and the control groups.
Results: Process findings indicated that the SAP was conducted as planned, with facilitators effectively employing solution-focused techniques. The program gained traction among SWD and proved feasible for implementation in college settings. SWD reported satisfaction with their participation and shared SAP's strengths as well as areas for improvement. Results indicated that SAP significantly increased SWDs' confidence in disclosing their disabilities and requesting accommodations in the workplace compared to their peers in the waitlist control group. However, no group differences were observed in self-advocacy and self-determination.
Conclusions/implications: The findings suggest that SAP offers benefits in various aspects of self-advocacy for college SWD, informing future implementations of SAP or similar initiatives targeting this group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:与普通人相比,残障人士的受教育程度往往较低,就业情况也较差,造成这种差异的部分原因是他们在学术和职业环境中的自我倡导技能发展不足,而有针对性的干预措施又十分有限。本研究设计并评估了一项为期 6 周的自我倡导计划(SAP),该计划采用了针对残疾大学生(SWDs)的简短疗法(Solution-focused Brief Therapy)技术:研究方法/设计:通过对大学生残障人士(n = 28)进行试点随机对照试验,对项目的过程和结果进行评估。过程评估包括可行性、忠实性和可接受性,而初步影响则通过比较 SAP 组和对照组的结果评估来确定:过程评估结果表明,SAP 计划按计划进行,主持人有效地运用了以解决问题为中心的技巧。该计划得到了社会弱势群体的认可,并证明了在大学环境中实施该计划的可行性。社工们对自己的参与表示满意,并分享了 SAP 的优点和需要改进的地方。结果表明,与候补对照组的同龄人相比,SAP 明显提高了社会弱势群体在工作场所披露其残疾情况和要求提供便利的信心。然而,在自我主张和自我决定方面,没有观察到任何群体差异:研究结果表明,SAP 在自我倡导的各个方面为大学生社残提供了益处,为今后实施 SAP 或针对该群体的类似计划提供了参考。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial for self-advocacy intervention in college students with disabilities.","authors":"Katherine Nieweglowski, Sang Qin, Eunjeong Ko","doi":"10.1037/rep0000583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000583","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>People with disabilities often achieve lower educational attainments and face worse employment outcomes compared to the general population, a disparity partially due to the insufficient development of self-advocacy skills in academic and professional environments where targeted interventions are limited. This study designed and evaluated a 6-week self-advocacy program (SAP) enhanced with solution-focused brief therapy techniques for college students with disabilities (SWDs).</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>A program evaluation on process and outcomes was conducted using a pilot randomized controlled trial with college SWD (<i>n</i> = 28). Process evaluations included feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability, whereas the preliminary impact was determined by comparing the outcome assessments of SAP and the control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Process findings indicated that the SAP was conducted as planned, with facilitators effectively employing solution-focused techniques. The program gained traction among SWD and proved feasible for implementation in college settings. SWD reported satisfaction with their participation and shared SAP's strengths as well as areas for improvement. Results indicated that SAP significantly increased SWDs' confidence in disclosing their disabilities and requesting accommodations in the workplace compared to their peers in the waitlist control group. However, no group differences were observed in self-advocacy and self-determination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>The findings suggest that SAP offers benefits in various aspects of self-advocacy for college SWD, informing future implementations of SAP or similar initiatives targeting this group. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Toni Saia, Uzma Khan, Andrea Perkins Nerlich, Rebecca Bero, Julie C Hill, Sara P Johnston
Purpose: The societal response and constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic reinforced ableism for disabled people who were yet again treated as an afterthought in society. Systemic ableism impacted their well-being, access, and ability to be active members of their community. Disabled experiences and voices must be heard and amplified to improve preparedness and address ableism. Disability Twitter is one avenue where the disability community can collectively listen and support one another. These voices can and should be used to influence policy and practice. This study used Disability Twitter to represent and honor the experiences of the disability community, using the COVID-19 pandemic as a moment in time.
Research method/design: Qualitative thematic analysis of U.S.-based Twitter posts was conducted using retrospective social media posts. A total of 238 initial tweets from January 1, 2020 and September 30, 2022 were analyzed by the research team.
Results: Five themes were observed including ableism, devaluation, worthiness, act of reclaiming, and emotion. Disabled people reported instances of ableism, devaluation, and victimization by individuals, systems, and government entities throughout the pandemic. Disabled individuals utilized Twitter to share their collective experiences, urging society to address and respond to the needs of the disability community.
Conclusions: Using social media to center the perspectives of the disability community can invoke system-wide change and inform policies. Implications for combating systemic ableism and promoting allyship for clinical professionals, research scholars, and educators are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"The COVID-19 experience through the lens of disability Twitter: A qualitative analysis.","authors":"Toni Saia, Uzma Khan, Andrea Perkins Nerlich, Rebecca Bero, Julie C Hill, Sara P Johnston","doi":"10.1037/rep0000587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000587","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The societal response and constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic reinforced ableism for disabled people who were yet again treated as an afterthought in society. Systemic ableism impacted their well-being, access, and ability to be active members of their community. Disabled experiences and voices must be heard and amplified to improve preparedness and address ableism. Disability Twitter is one avenue where the disability community can collectively listen and support one another. These voices can and should be used to influence policy and practice. This study used Disability Twitter to represent and honor the experiences of the disability community, using the COVID-19 pandemic as a moment in time.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Qualitative thematic analysis of U.S.-based Twitter posts was conducted using retrospective social media posts. A total of 238 initial tweets from January 1, 2020 and September 30, 2022 were analyzed by the research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were observed including ableism, devaluation, worthiness, act of reclaiming, and emotion. Disabled people reported instances of ableism, devaluation, and victimization by individuals, systems, and government entities throughout the pandemic. Disabled individuals utilized Twitter to share their collective experiences, urging society to address and respond to the needs of the disability community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using social media to center the perspectives of the disability community can invoke system-wide change and inform policies. Implications for combating systemic ableism and promoting allyship for clinical professionals, research scholars, and educators are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pauline Caille, Yannick Stephan, François Alexandre, Virginie Molinier, Nelly Héraud
Objective: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the gold standard treatment for improving the health status of individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRD). However, to achieve lasting results, the adoption and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle are necessary. Unfortunately, the trajectories of change in physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) following PR are marked by a high degree of heterogeneity between patients. This study aimed to better understand the factors underlying this variability by investigating the role played by the personality as defined by the five-factor model.
Design: Eighty eight CRD patients were assessed on personality upon PR admission (Time 1). PA and SB were assessed at Time 1 and 6 months post-PR (Time 2) using questionnaires.
Results: Multiple regression analyses revealed that "healthy neuroticism" is associated with an increase in PA 6 months after PR (β = .20, p < .05) independently of the PA at Time 1. A high level of neuroticism, when it is paired with a low level of conscientiousness, is related to an increase in SB 6 months after PR (β = -.20, p < .01), when the SB and exercise tolerance at Time 1 were controlled for.
Conclusion: These findings highlight that investigating the interaction between personality traits is relevant to a better understanding of the interindividual differences in changes in PA and SB after PR in patients with CRD. The behavioral effects of PR could be improved if patients' personality traits were taken into account in the design of behavior-change interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Personality and health behavior changes after pulmonary rehabilitation: A longitudinal observational study.","authors":"Pauline Caille, Yannick Stephan, François Alexandre, Virginie Molinier, Nelly Héraud","doi":"10.1037/rep0000584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000584","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the gold standard treatment for improving the health status of individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRD). However, to achieve lasting results, the adoption and maintenance of a physically active lifestyle are necessary. Unfortunately, the trajectories of change in physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) following PR are marked by a high degree of heterogeneity between patients. This study aimed to better understand the factors underlying this variability by investigating the role played by the personality as defined by the five-factor model.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Eighty eight CRD patients were assessed on personality upon PR admission (Time 1). PA and SB were assessed at Time 1 and 6 months post-PR (Time 2) using questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple regression analyses revealed that \"healthy neuroticism\" is associated with an increase in PA 6 months after PR (β = .20, <i>p</i> < .05) independently of the PA at Time 1. A high level of neuroticism, when it is paired with a low level of conscientiousness, is related to an increase in SB 6 months after PR (β = -.20, <i>p</i> < .01), when the SB and exercise tolerance at Time 1 were controlled for.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight that investigating the interaction between personality traits is relevant to a better understanding of the interindividual differences in changes in PA and SB after PR in patients with CRD. The behavioral effects of PR could be improved if patients' personality traits were taken into account in the design of behavior-change interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142337005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kimberley R Monden,Jason Nupp,Asma Ali,Bria MacIntyre,Mitch Sevigny,Angela Hanks Philippus
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of using commercially available heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training to improve physiological and self-reported stress and anxiety among adults with tetraplegia. HRV biofeedback teaches individuals to effectively modify their HRV levels in synchronization with their respiration rate and amplitude.RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGNThirty participants with tetraplegia were enrolled and allocated into one of two study arms: biofeedback or control. The study was conducted remotely from June 2022 through February 2023. Participants in the biofeedback arm received eight HRV training sessions with physiological monitoring, while participants in the control arm received physiological monitoring only. Outcome measures included feasibility, percentage of time spent in the low-frequency range, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, the Subjective Units of Distress Scale, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y Form.RESULTSFeasibility was demonstrated with 100% completion of the protocol and no participant withdrawals due to adverse events. The biofeedback arm showed a greater percentage of time spent in the low-frequency range and reported greater improvement in anxiety from baseline to Session 8 on the Subjective Units of Distress Scale compared to the control arm. However, no differences were found between study arms on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y Form.CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONSThis study demonstrated that a remotely delivered, self-administered HRV biofeedback intervention could feasibly be delivered to individuals with tetraplegia who report moderate-to-high levels of anxiety. Trends in the reduction of physiological and self-reported anxiety were observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Exploring the feasibility of heart rate variability biofeedback for individuals with tetraplegia: A pilot clinical trial.","authors":"Kimberley R Monden,Jason Nupp,Asma Ali,Bria MacIntyre,Mitch Sevigny,Angela Hanks Philippus","doi":"10.1037/rep0000577","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000577","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE/OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of using commercially available heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training to improve physiological and self-reported stress and anxiety among adults with tetraplegia. HRV biofeedback teaches individuals to effectively modify their HRV levels in synchronization with their respiration rate and amplitude.RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGNThirty participants with tetraplegia were enrolled and allocated into one of two study arms: biofeedback or control. The study was conducted remotely from June 2022 through February 2023. Participants in the biofeedback arm received eight HRV training sessions with physiological monitoring, while participants in the control arm received physiological monitoring only. Outcome measures included feasibility, percentage of time spent in the low-frequency range, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21, the Subjective Units of Distress Scale, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y Form.RESULTSFeasibility was demonstrated with 100% completion of the protocol and no participant withdrawals due to adverse events. The biofeedback arm showed a greater percentage of time spent in the low-frequency range and reported greater improvement in anxiety from baseline to Session 8 on the Subjective Units of Distress Scale compared to the control arm. However, no differences were found between study arms on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y Form.CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONSThis study demonstrated that a remotely delivered, self-administered HRV biofeedback intervention could feasibly be delivered to individuals with tetraplegia who report moderate-to-high levels of anxiety. Trends in the reduction of physiological and self-reported anxiety were observed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142209683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dylan G Serpas, Daniel A Ignacio, Kemesha Gabbidon, Barbara J Cherry
Purpose/objective: Experiences of disability-based discrimination among adults with disabilities (AWD) span individual, interpersonal, and structural domains that are implicated in mental health disparities. Ableist microaggressions, a subtle and contemporary form of disability-based discrimination, are positively associated with psychological distress. Additionally, disability characteristics may impact mental health outcomes differently. This study investigated (a) the association between lifetime experiences of ableist microaggressions and psychological distress and (b) the moderating effect of disability visibility.
Research method/design: A cross-sectional survey-based online study through Amazon's Mechanical Turk was conducted among 995 AWD whose ages ranged from 18 to 70 (M = 34.73, SD = 9.45).
Results: After adjusting for confounds linear regression analyses revealed a significant, positive relationship between ableist microaggressions and depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Models explained approximately 18%-23% of the variance in psychological distress. Moderation analyses indicated that associations were stronger among participants with less visible disabilities.
Conclusions/implications: Findings underscore disability visibility as an important correlate in AWD mental health disparities. Results should be interpreted within the scope of the sampling procedures and sample demographics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Ableist microaggressions and psychological distress among adults with disabilities: The role of disability visibility.","authors":"Dylan G Serpas, Daniel A Ignacio, Kemesha Gabbidon, Barbara J Cherry","doi":"10.1037/rep0000582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000582","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>Experiences of disability-based discrimination among adults with disabilities (AWD) span individual, interpersonal, and structural domains that are implicated in mental health disparities. Ableist microaggressions, a subtle and contemporary form of disability-based discrimination, are positively associated with psychological distress. Additionally, disability characteristics may impact mental health outcomes differently. This study investigated (a) the association between lifetime experiences of ableist microaggressions and psychological distress and (b) the moderating effect of disability visibility.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey-based online study through Amazon's Mechanical Turk was conducted among 995 AWD whose ages ranged from 18 to 70 (<i>M</i> = 34.73, <i>SD</i> = 9.45).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for confounds linear regression analyses revealed a significant, positive relationship between ableist microaggressions and depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Models explained approximately 18%-23% of the variance in psychological distress. Moderation analyses indicated that associations were stronger among participants with less visible disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Findings underscore disability visibility as an important correlate in AWD mental health disparities. Results should be interpreted within the scope of the sampling procedures and sample demographics. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Madhura Phansikar, Elizabeth Jean Duraney, Heena R Manglani, Anita Shankar, Christine Roberts, Rebecca Andridge, Jacqueline A Nicholas, Rick Petosa, Ruchika S Prakash
Objective: Multiple sclerosis is associated with impairments in working memory functioning. Lifestyle physical activity interventions show promise in improving cognitive functioning; however, the evidence is limited. We examined the efficacy of a lifestyle physical activity intervention, involving step tracking and psychoeducational materials, on improving step counts, working memory functioning, and network strength in a whole-brain network of working memory.
Method: Participants (n = 75) were randomly assigned to a group tracking steps with a pedometer (step-track), or a group tracking water intake with a smart water bottle (water-track), for 6 months. At baseline, mid, and postintervention, we assessed weekly physical activity (GT3X+ accelerometer), weekly water intake (H20 Pal Smart Bottle), and working memory functioning. Additionally, the combined network strength of a validated working memory connectome was calculated.
Results: We ran random intercept linear mixed models to examine differences between the groups, over time. A significant Group × Time interaction effect with steps and water intake indicated that the step-track group increased their steps, and the water-track group increased their water intake, in comparison to each other, from baseline to postintervention (p < .05). Both groups improved in behavioral working memory over time (p < .05). No significant differences were found on the network strength.
Conclusion: Our 6-month randomized controlled trial involving physical activity tracking showed increased step count in the intervention group. Behavioral working memory improved in both groups, potentially due to practice effects. Future studies should include both active and passive control groups to discern practice effects from intervention impact. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:多发性硬化症与工作记忆功能受损有关:多发性硬化症与工作记忆功能受损有关。生活方式体育锻炼干预有望改善认知功能,但证据有限。我们研究了一种生活方式体育锻炼干预措施(包括步数跟踪和心理教育材料)对改善步数、工作记忆功能和工作记忆全脑网络强度的效果:参与者(n = 75)被随机分配到使用计步器追踪步数的小组(步数追踪)或使用智能水壶追踪水摄入量的小组(水追踪),为期 6 个月。在基线、中期和干预后,我们对每周的体力活动(GT3X+加速度计)、每周的水摄入量(H20 Pal 智能水壶)和工作记忆功能进行了评估。此外,我们还计算了经过验证的工作记忆连接组的综合网络强度:我们运行随机截距线性混合模型来研究各组间随时间变化的差异。与步数和水摄入量相比,"组×时间 "交互效应显着,表明从基线到干预后,步数跟踪组的步数增加了,而水跟踪组的水摄入量增加了(p < .05)。随着时间的推移,两组的行为工作记忆都有所改善(P < .05)。在网络强度方面没有发现明显差异:我们为期 6 个月的体力活动跟踪随机对照试验表明,干预组的步数有所增加。两组的行为工作记忆都有所改善,这可能是由于练习效应。未来的研究应包括主动对照组和被动对照组,以便从干预效果中发现练习效应。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"TRACking health behavior in people with multiple sclerosis: Effects of a randomized trial on physical activity and working memory.","authors":"Madhura Phansikar, Elizabeth Jean Duraney, Heena R Manglani, Anita Shankar, Christine Roberts, Rebecca Andridge, Jacqueline A Nicholas, Rick Petosa, Ruchika S Prakash","doi":"10.1037/rep0000578","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000578","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multiple sclerosis is associated with impairments in working memory functioning. Lifestyle physical activity interventions show promise in improving cognitive functioning; however, the evidence is limited. We examined the efficacy of a lifestyle physical activity intervention, involving step tracking and psychoeducational materials, on improving step counts, working memory functioning, and network strength in a whole-brain network of working memory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 75) were randomly assigned to a group tracking steps with a pedometer (step-track), or a group tracking water intake with a smart water bottle (water-track), for 6 months. At baseline, mid, and postintervention, we assessed weekly physical activity (GT3X+ accelerometer), weekly water intake (H20 Pal Smart Bottle), and working memory functioning. Additionally, the combined network strength of a validated working memory connectome was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We ran random intercept linear mixed models to examine differences between the groups, over time. A significant Group × Time interaction effect with steps and water intake indicated that the step-track group increased their steps, and the water-track group increased their water intake, in comparison to each other, from baseline to postintervention (<i>p</i> < .05). Both groups improved in behavioral working memory over time (<i>p</i> < .05). No significant differences were found on the network strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our 6-month randomized controlled trial involving physical activity tracking showed increased step count in the intervention group. Behavioral working memory improved in both groups, potentially due to practice effects. Future studies should include both active and passive control groups to discern practice effects from intervention impact. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Megan E Douglas, Monica Bennett, Kirstie A Jones, Jamie R Pogue, Gregory V Chauvette, Seema Sikka, Simon Driver, Rita Hamilton, Nicholas Curcio, Sarita Patel, Andrea Wierzchowski, Maris Adams, Estrella V Thomas, Emma Turner, Kiara Leonard, Emily Carl, Michael Foreman, Ann Marie Warren, Mark B Powers
Purpose/objective: Individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at a higher rate, which is associated with worse psychiatric comorbidity, decreased quality of life, and greater disability. Yet, effective PTSD interventions remain understudied for individuals with SCI. We conducted the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an evidence-based psychotherapy (prolonged exposure [PE]) with survivors of SCI during acute rehabilitation. We examined the efficacy, feasibility, and secondary outcomes.
Research method/design: Participants (n = 29) were adults recruited from 2018 to 2021 1-month postinjury with PTSD randomized into either PE therapy or treatment as usual. The primary outcome was PTSD assessed at baseline, 6, 10, and 32 weeks postenrollment.
Results: An overall group-by-time interaction was not statistically significant (p = .102), but effect sizes demonstrated moderate and large improvements in PTSD for the PE group at 6 (-19.4 vs. -9.7) and 10 (-25.8 vs. -5.7), respectively. Similarly, moderate to large effect sizes were observed for depression, maladaptive posttraumatic cognitions, disruptive nocturnal behaviors, SCI-related quality of life, and risky alcohol consumption. Low rates of enrollment (50%) and treatment completion (25%) suggest feasibility challenges; however, treatment completers did report high satisfaction (100%).
Conclusions/implications: Results suggest that individuals who received PE had a quicker and clinically meaningful reduction in PTSD symptoms, but delivery during acute rehabilitation is not feasible for many individuals. Future research should examine abbreviated versions of PE for PTSD to enhance the feasibility of treatment in this setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:脊髓损伤(SCI)患者患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的比例较高,这与精神疾病合并症加重、生活质量下降和残疾程度加深有关。然而,针对 SCI 患者的有效创伤后应激障碍干预措施仍未得到充分研究。我们对急性康复期间的 SCI 幸存者进行了首次基于证据的心理疗法(长期暴露疗法 [PE])随机对照试验(RCT)。研究方法/设计:参与者(n = 29)是2018年至2021年招募的伤后1个月患有创伤后应激障碍的成年人,他们被随机分配到PE疗法或常规治疗中。主要结果是在基线、注册后6周、10周和32周评估创伤后应激障碍:各组与时间之间的总体交互作用无统计学意义(P = .102),但效果大小显示,PE 组在 6 周(-19.4 vs. -9.7)和 10 周(-25.8 vs. -5.7)时的创伤后应激障碍分别有中度和大幅改善。同样,在抑郁、创伤后不良认知、扰乱性夜间行为、与 SCI 相关的生活质量和危险饮酒方面也观察到了中等至较大的效应大小。入学率(50%)和治疗完成率(25%)较低,这表明在可行性方面存在挑战;不过,治疗完成者确实报告了较高的满意度(100%):研究结果表明,接受创伤后应激障碍心理治疗的患者的创伤后应激障碍症状减轻得更快、更有临床意义,但在急性康复期进行治疗对许多人来说并不可行。未来的研究应研究针对创伤后应激障碍的简易PE疗法,以提高在这种情况下进行治疗的可行性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder following spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Megan E Douglas, Monica Bennett, Kirstie A Jones, Jamie R Pogue, Gregory V Chauvette, Seema Sikka, Simon Driver, Rita Hamilton, Nicholas Curcio, Sarita Patel, Andrea Wierzchowski, Maris Adams, Estrella V Thomas, Emma Turner, Kiara Leonard, Emily Carl, Michael Foreman, Ann Marie Warren, Mark B Powers","doi":"10.1037/rep0000580","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000580","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>Individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) may experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at a higher rate, which is associated with worse psychiatric comorbidity, decreased quality of life, and greater disability. Yet, effective PTSD interventions remain understudied for individuals with SCI. We conducted the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an evidence-based psychotherapy (prolonged exposure [PE]) with survivors of SCI during acute rehabilitation. We examined the efficacy, feasibility, and secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 29) were adults recruited from 2018 to 2021 1-month postinjury with PTSD randomized into either PE therapy or treatment as usual. The primary outcome was PTSD assessed at baseline, 6, 10, and 32 weeks postenrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An overall group-by-time interaction was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = .102), but effect sizes demonstrated moderate and large improvements in PTSD for the PE group at 6 (-19.4 vs. -9.7) and 10 (-25.8 vs. -5.7), respectively. Similarly, moderate to large effect sizes were observed for depression, maladaptive posttraumatic cognitions, disruptive nocturnal behaviors, SCI-related quality of life, and risky alcohol consumption. Low rates of enrollment (50%) and treatment completion (25%) suggest feasibility challenges; however, treatment completers did report high satisfaction (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>Results suggest that individuals who received PE had a quicker and clinically meaningful reduction in PTSD symptoms, but delivery during acute rehabilitation is not feasible for many individuals. Future research should examine abbreviated versions of PE for PTSD to enhance the feasibility of treatment in this setting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}