首页 > 最新文献

Health Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
Physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents: a systematic review. 为促进高危儿童和青少年心理健康成果而采取的体育活动干预措施:系统综述。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2391787
Aaron Simpson, Samantha Teague, Benjamin Kramer, Ashleigh Lin, Ashleigh L Thornton, Timothy Budden, Bonnie Furzer, Ivan Jeftic, James Dimmock, Michael Rosenberg, Ben Jackson

Many young people are exposed to risk factors that increase their risk of mental illness. Physical activity provision is an increasingly popular approach to protect against mental illness in the face of these risk factors. We examined the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents. We searched health databases for randomised and non-randomised intervention studies, with no date restriction, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. We present a narrative synthesis of our results accompanied with a summary of available effect sizes. Thirty-seven reports on 36 studies were included, with multi-sport or yoga interventions the most popular intervention approaches (a combined 50% of included studies). Outcomes measured included internalising, self-evaluative, wellbeing, overall symptomatology, resilience, externalising, and trauma outcomes. We found that 63% of between-groups effects favoured the intervention arm, and 83% of within-groups effects favoured an intervention effect. While recognising high risk of bias, our findings provide evidence in support of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for promoting mental health outcomes in at-risk young people. We encourage further work designed to better understand the intervention characteristics that may lead to positive benefits.

许多年轻人都面临着增加其罹患精神疾病风险的危险因素。面对这些风险因素,提供体育锻炼是一种越来越受欢迎的预防精神疾病的方法。我们研究了体育锻炼干预对促进高危儿童和青少年心理健康的有效性。我们在健康数据库中搜索了随机和非随机干预研究,没有日期限制,并使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估了偏倚风险。我们对研究结果进行了叙述性综合,并附有可用效应大小摘要。共纳入了 36 项研究的 37 份报告,其中多种运动或瑜伽干预是最受欢迎的干预方法(共占纳入研究的 50%)。测量的结果包括内化、自我评价、幸福感、总体症状、复原力、外化和创伤结果。我们发现,63%的组间效应倾向于干预组,83%的组内效应倾向于干预效应。虽然我们认识到偏差风险很高,但我们的研究结果为体育锻炼干预对促进高危青少年心理健康成果的有效性提供了证据支持。我们鼓励进一步开展工作,以便更好地了解可能带来积极益处的干预特点。
{"title":"Physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents: a systematic review.","authors":"Aaron Simpson, Samantha Teague, Benjamin Kramer, Ashleigh Lin, Ashleigh L Thornton, Timothy Budden, Bonnie Furzer, Ivan Jeftic, James Dimmock, Michael Rosenberg, Ben Jackson","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2391787","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2391787","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many young people are exposed to risk factors that increase their risk of mental illness. Physical activity provision is an increasingly popular approach to protect against mental illness in the face of these risk factors. We examined the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for the promotion of mental health outcomes in at-risk children and adolescents. We searched health databases for randomised and non-randomised intervention studies, with no date restriction, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. We present a narrative synthesis of our results accompanied with a summary of available effect sizes. Thirty-seven reports on 36 studies were included, with multi-sport or yoga interventions the most popular intervention approaches (a combined 50% of included studies). Outcomes measured included internalising, self-evaluative, wellbeing, overall symptomatology, resilience, externalising, and trauma outcomes. We found that 63% of between-groups effects favoured the intervention arm, and 83% of within-groups effects favoured an intervention effect. While recognising high risk of bias, our findings provide evidence in support of the effectiveness of physical activity interventions for promoting mental health outcomes in at-risk young people. We encourage further work designed to better understand the intervention characteristics that may lead to positive benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"899-933"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions in health psychology and behavioural medicine journals: a review. 健康心理学和行为医学期刊对行为健康干预试验结果的选择性报告:综述。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2367613
Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Jen O'Shea, Stephen Kennedy, Siobhan D Thomas, Kerry Avery, Molly Byrne, Sheena McHugh, Daryl B O' Connor, Ian J Saldanha, Valerie Smith, Elaine Toomey, Kerry Dwan, Jamie J Kirkham

Selective outcome reporting can result in overestimation of treatment effects, research waste, and reduced openness and transparency. This review aimed to examine selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions and determine potential outcome reporting bias. A review of nine health psychology and behavioural medicine journals was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of behavioural health interventions published since 2019. Discrepancies in outcome reporting were observed in 90% of the 29 trials with corresponding registrations/protocols. Discrepancies included 72% of trials omitting prespecified outcomes; 55% of trials introduced new outcomes. Thirty-eight percent of trials omitted prespecified and introduced new outcomes. Three trials (10%) downgraded primary outcomes in registrations/protocols to secondary outcomes in final reports; downgraded outcomes were not statistically significant in two trials. Five trials (17%) upgraded secondary outcomes to primary outcomes; upgraded outcomes were statistically significant in all trials. In final reports, three trials (7%) omitted outcomes from the methods section; three trials (7%) introduced new outcomes in results that were not in the methods. These findings indicate that selective outcome reporting is a problem in behavioural health intervention trials. Journal- and trialist-level approaches are needed to minimise selective outcome reporting in health psychology and behavioural medicine.

选择性结果报告可能会导致治疗效果被高估、研究浪费以及公开性和透明度降低。本综述旨在研究行为健康干预试验中的选择性结果报告,并确定潜在的结果报告偏差。我们对九种健康心理学和行为医学期刊进行了回顾,以确定自2019年以来发表的行为健康干预随机对照试验。在29项有相应注册/方案的试验中,90%的试验结果报告存在差异。差异包括72%的试验遗漏了预先指定的结果;55%的试验引入了新的结果。38%的试验遗漏了预先指定的结果并引入了新的结果。三项试验(10%)将登记/方案中的主要结果降级为最终报告中的次要结果;在两项试验中,降级结果没有统计学意义。五项试验(17%)将次要结果升级为主要结果;在所有试验中,升级后的结果均具有统计学意义。在最终报告中,有三项试验(7%)遗漏了方法部分的结果;有三项试验(7%)在结果中引入了方法中没有的新结果。这些发现表明,选择性结果报告是行为健康干预试验中的一个问题。需要在期刊和试验者层面采取相应措施,尽量减少健康心理学和行为医学中的选择性结果报告。
{"title":"Selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions in health psychology and behavioural medicine journals: a review.","authors":"Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Jen O'Shea, Stephen Kennedy, Siobhan D Thomas, Kerry Avery, Molly Byrne, Sheena McHugh, Daryl B O' Connor, Ian J Saldanha, Valerie Smith, Elaine Toomey, Kerry Dwan, Jamie J Kirkham","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2367613","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2367613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selective outcome reporting can result in overestimation of treatment effects, research waste, and reduced openness and transparency. This review aimed to examine selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions and determine potential outcome reporting bias. A review of nine health psychology and behavioural medicine journals was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of behavioural health interventions published since 2019. Discrepancies in outcome reporting were observed in 90% of the 29 trials with corresponding registrations/protocols. Discrepancies included 72% of trials omitting prespecified outcomes; 55% of trials introduced new outcomes. Thirty-eight percent of trials omitted prespecified <i>and</i> introduced new outcomes. Three trials (10%) downgraded primary outcomes in registrations/protocols to secondary outcomes in final reports; downgraded outcomes were not statistically significant in two trials. Five trials (17%) upgraded secondary outcomes to primary outcomes; upgraded outcomes were statistically significant in all trials. In final reports, three trials (7%) omitted outcomes from the methods section; three trials (7%) introduced new outcomes in results that were not in the methods. These findings indicate that selective outcome reporting is a problem in behavioural health intervention trials. Journal- and trialist-level approaches are needed to minimise selective outcome reporting in health psychology and behavioural medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"824-838"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and diagnosis in burn survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 烧伤幸存者中创伤后应激障碍症状和诊断的流行率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2423725
Elise Boersma-van Dam, Laura Shepherd, Rens van de Schoot, Iris M Engelhard, Nancy E E Van Loey

Great disparity is observed among studies investigating the prevalence of PTSD after burns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the pooled prevalence of PTSD in adult burn survivors over the first two years post-burn. Five electronic databases were searched for observational studies assessing the prevalence of PTSD symptoms after burns. Meta-analysis was performed using an auto-correlation and hierarchical effects model to estimate the course of PTSD prevalence rates over time and to establish point-prevalences. The effect of different moderators over time was tested with meta-regression. Thirty-two studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of PTSD was 20.5% (95% CI 16.4-24.6) and the prevalence significantly decreased by about 0.37% per month post-burn over time. Questionnaire-based studies, and studies published from 2000 onwards, were more likely to show a decrease in PTSD prevalence over time compared to diagnostic studies and studies before 2000. A qualitative comparison revealed that inter-continental differences are likely to be complex and multi-factorial. PTSD affects about one in five burn survivors, with moderately decreasing rates from six months post-burn onwards. Early screening and identification of burn survivors who require specialist psychological care are vital for burns services.

对烧伤后创伤后应激障碍患病率的调查研究之间存在很大差异。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨成年烧伤幸存者在烧伤后头两年内创伤后应激障碍的总体发病率。我们在五个电子数据库中搜索了评估烧伤后创伤后应激障碍症状发生率的观察性研究。使用自相关和分层效应模型进行了元分析,以估计创伤后应激障碍患病率随时间变化的过程,并确定点患病率。通过元回归测试了不同调节因素随时间变化的影响。共有 32 项研究被纳入荟萃分析。创伤后应激障碍的总患病率为 20.5%(95% CI 16.4-24.6),随着时间的推移,烧伤后的患病率每月显著下降约 0.37%。与诊断性研究和 2000 年以前的研究相比,基于问卷的研究和 2000 年以后发表的研究更有可能显示创伤后应激障碍患病率随时间推移而下降。定性比较显示,洲际间的差异可能是复杂和多因素的。约五分之一的烧伤幸存者会受到创伤后应激障碍的影响,从烧伤后六个月开始,该比例会适度下降。早期筛查和识别需要专业心理治疗的烧伤幸存者对烧伤服务至关重要。
{"title":"The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and diagnosis in burn survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Elise Boersma-van Dam, Laura Shepherd, Rens van de Schoot, Iris M Engelhard, Nancy E E Van Loey","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2423725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2423725","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Great disparity is observed among studies investigating the prevalence of PTSD after burns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the pooled prevalence of PTSD in adult burn survivors over the first two years post-burn. Five electronic databases were searched for observational studies assessing the prevalence of PTSD symptoms after burns. Meta-analysis was performed using an auto-correlation and hierarchical effects model to estimate the course of PTSD prevalence rates over time and to establish point-prevalences. The effect of different moderators over time was tested with meta-regression. Thirty-two studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of PTSD was 20.5% (95% CI 16.4-24.6) and the prevalence significantly decreased by about 0.37% per month post-burn over time. Questionnaire-based studies, and studies published from 2000 onwards, were more likely to show a decrease in PTSD prevalence over time compared to diagnostic studies and studies before 2000. A qualitative comparison revealed that inter-continental differences are likely to be complex and multi-factorial. PTSD affects about one in five burn survivors, with moderately decreasing rates from six months post-burn onwards. Early screening and identification of burn survivors who require specialist psychological care are vital for burns services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Yoga as an intervention for stress: a meta-analysis. 瑜伽作为压力干预措施:一项荟萃分析。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2420974
Michael C Rhoads, Madison E Barber, Nels Grevstad, Rena A Kirkland, Shannon Myers, Katherine A Gruidel, Ethan Greenwood

The escalating stress epidemic in modern society has raised concerns about its impact on physical and mental health, prompting the need for effective interventions. Yoga, a multifaceted mind-body practice, has gained recognition for its potential in mitigating perceived stress. Our meta-analysis aimed to estimate yoga's impact on lowering perceived stress as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale. We identified 36 studies meeting inclusion criteria and found a statistically significant moderate effect of yoga on reducing perceived stress (g = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.29-0.66). Our analysis uncovered substantial heterogeneity (Q = 117.33, p < .001), with 74.90% of the variation in effect sizes attributed to study characteristics. In planned moderator analyses, we hypothesised that yoga with breathwork, relaxation, high stress symptoms, greater number of hours practiced, and studies conducted in India would yield larger effects. Stress severity was shown to be statistically significant. However, the remaining hypotheses were not supported. Additionally, we examined five exploratory moderator variables, which did not yield significant results. Further research is needed to elucidate the source of heterogeneity across studies and reveal recommendations for specific populations.

现代社会中压力流行病的不断升级引发了人们对压力对身心健康影响的关注,促使人们需要采取有效的干预措施。瑜伽是一种多方面的身心练习,它在减轻感知压力方面的潜力已得到认可。我们的荟萃分析旨在估算瑜伽对降低感知压力的影响,以感知压力量表(Perceived Stress Scale)来衡量。我们确定了 36 项符合纳入标准的研究,发现瑜伽对降低感知压力具有统计学意义上显著的中度影响(g = 0.48,95% CI = 0.29-0.66)。我们的分析发现了很大的异质性(Q = 117.33,p
{"title":"Yoga as an intervention for stress: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Michael C Rhoads, Madison E Barber, Nels Grevstad, Rena A Kirkland, Shannon Myers, Katherine A Gruidel, Ethan Greenwood","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2420974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2420974","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The escalating stress epidemic in modern society has raised concerns about its impact on physical and mental health, prompting the need for effective interventions. Yoga, a multifaceted mind-body practice, has gained recognition for its potential in mitigating perceived stress. Our meta-analysis aimed to estimate yoga's impact on lowering perceived stress as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale. We identified 36 studies meeting inclusion criteria and found a statistically significant moderate effect of yoga on reducing perceived stress (<i>g</i> = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.29-0.66). Our analysis uncovered substantial heterogeneity (<i>Q</i> = 117.33, <i>p</i> < .001), with 74.90% of the variation in effect sizes attributed to study characteristics. In planned moderator analyses, we hypothesised that yoga with breathwork, relaxation, high stress symptoms, greater number of hours practiced, and studies conducted in India would yield larger effects. Stress severity was shown to be statistically significant. However, the remaining hypotheses were not supported. Additionally, we examined five exploratory moderator variables, which did not yield significant results. Further research is needed to elucidate the source of heterogeneity across studies and reveal recommendations for specific populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analytical decisions pose moral questions. 分析性决策会提出道德问题。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2425689
Mirela Zaneva

How often do we reflect on the potential moral or value implications - what is right, wrong, has value and is (in)appropriate - of seemingly trivial analytical decisions, such as how to dichotomise a variable? I argue that analytical choices relate to multifaceted and oftentimes challenging moral issues that scientists should take into deeper consideration. Here, I illustrate a variety of potential considerations about moral values, including issues like exclusion, marginalisation, autonomy, responsibility, non-maleficence in relation to various common analytical choices and practices, such as the use of thresholds for disease diagnosis or population definition, the use of composite measures in the context of clarifying effects, classification practices, decisions on variable selection, as well as decisions relating to (dis)aggregation of data. I discuss these examples in the context of reasonable theoretical or statistical reservations. I advocate for deeper engagement with the difficult moral implications of analytical decisions, and for a principled and pluralistic science, that is also a more robust science. Such a science can include diverse moral views through a coupled ethical-epistemic approach, sensitivity tests, multiverse analysis, as well as stronger commitments to participatory and mutual learning practices.

我们有多少次反思过看似微不足道的分析决定(如如何对变量进行二分法)可能产生的道德或价值影响--什么是对的、错的、有价值的以及(不)适当的?我认为,分析性选择涉及多方面的道德问题,有时甚至是具有挑战性的道德问题,科学家应对此进行更深入的思考。在此,我将举例说明有关道德价值的各种潜在考量,包括与各种常见分析选择和实践相关的排斥、边缘化、自主、责任、非恶意等问题,如在疾病诊断或人口定义中使用阈值、在澄清效应的背景下使用综合测量、分类实践、变量选择决策以及与数据(非)聚合相关的决策。我结合合理的理论或统计保留意见来讨论这些例子。我主张更深入地探讨分析决策所涉及的道德难题,并主张建立一门有原则的多元化科学,同时也是一门更稳健的科学。这样的科学可以通过伦理-认识论相结合的方法、敏感性测试、多元宇宙分析,以及对参与性和相互学习实践的更有力承诺,纳入不同的道德观点。
{"title":"Analytical decisions pose moral questions.","authors":"Mirela Zaneva","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2425689","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2425689","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How often do we reflect on the potential moral or value implications - what is right, wrong, has value and is (in)appropriate - of seemingly trivial analytical decisions, such as how to dichotomise a variable? I argue that analytical choices relate to multifaceted and oftentimes challenging moral issues that scientists should take into deeper consideration. Here, I illustrate a variety of potential considerations about moral values, including issues like exclusion, marginalisation, autonomy, responsibility, non-maleficence in relation to various common analytical choices and practices, such as the use of thresholds for disease diagnosis or population definition, the use of composite measures in the context of clarifying effects, classification practices, decisions on variable selection, as well as decisions relating to (dis)aggregation of data. I discuss these examples in the context of reasonable theoretical or statistical reservations. I advocate for deeper engagement with the difficult moral implications of analytical decisions, and for a principled and pluralistic science, that is also a more robust science. Such a science can include diverse moral views through a coupled ethical-epistemic approach, sensitivity tests, multiverse analysis, as well as stronger commitments to participatory and mutual learning practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Components of multiple health behaviour change interventions for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized trials. 针对慢性病患者的多种健康行为改变干预措施的组成部分:随机试验的系统回顾和元回归。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2413871
Carolina C Silva, Justin Presseau, Zack van Allen, John Dinsmore, Paulina Schenk, Maiara Moreto, Marta M Marques

Interventions addressing more than one health behaviour at a time could be an efficient way of intervening to manage chronic conditions. Within a systematic review of multiple health behaviour change (MBHC) interventions, we identified key components of interventions in patients with chronic conditions, assessed how they are linked to theory, behaviour change techniques implemented, and evaluated their impact on intervention effectiveness. Studies were identified by systematically searching five electronic databases. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to analyse the association between intervention components and behavioural changes. In total, 61 studies were included spanning different chronic conditions (e.g., cardiovascular conditions, type 2 diabetes). Most interventions sought to change behaviours simultaneously (72%), often targeting the 'physical activity, diet and smoking' cluster of behaviours (33%), and were not theory informed (55%). A total of 36 behaviour change techniques were identified, most commonly goal setting behaviour and self-monitoring of behaviour. Subgroup analyses indicated that MHBC interventions delivered entirely face-to-face might not be as effective for physical activity outcomes, and not using goal setting (behaviour) might be more effective for smoking cessation outcomes. Meta-regressions indicated that a longer intervention duration may work best to achieve better physical activity outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of interventions and contributes to the field of MHBC by facilitating data-driven insights for future optimisation and dissemination.

同时针对一种以上健康行为的干预措施可能是管理慢性病的有效干预方式。在对多种健康行为改变(MBHC)干预措施的系统性回顾中,我们确定了针对慢性病患者的干预措施的关键组成部分,评估了它们如何与理论、行为改变技术的实施相联系,并评估了它们对干预效果的影响。通过系统检索五个电子数据库,我们确定了相关研究。进行了分组分析和元回归,以分析干预内容与行为改变之间的关联。共纳入了 61 项研究,涉及不同的慢性疾病(如心血管疾病、2 型糖尿病)。大多数干预措施试图同时改变行为(72%),通常针对 "体育锻炼、饮食和吸烟 "行为群(33%),并且没有理论依据(55%)。共确定了 36 种行为改变技术,其中最常见的是目标设定行为和行为自我监控。分组分析表明,完全面对面进行的 MHBC 干预可能对体育锻炼效果不那么有效,而不使用目标设定(行为)可能对戒烟效果更有效。元回归结果表明,干预持续时间越长,体育锻炼效果越好。本综述提供了对干预措施的全面了解,并通过促进数据驱动的洞察力,为未来的优化和推广工作做出了贡献。
{"title":"Components of multiple health behaviour change interventions for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized trials.","authors":"Carolina C Silva, Justin Presseau, Zack van Allen, John Dinsmore, Paulina Schenk, Maiara Moreto, Marta M Marques","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2413871","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2413871","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interventions addressing more than one health behaviour at a time could be an efficient way of intervening to manage chronic conditions. Within a systematic review of multiple health behaviour change (MBHC) interventions, we identified key components of interventions in patients with chronic conditions, assessed how they are linked to theory, behaviour change techniques implemented, and evaluated their impact on intervention effectiveness. Studies were identified by systematically searching five electronic databases. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted to analyse the association between intervention components and behavioural changes. In total, 61 studies were included spanning different chronic conditions (e.g., cardiovascular conditions, type 2 diabetes). Most interventions sought to change behaviours simultaneously (72%), often targeting the 'physical activity, diet and smoking' cluster of behaviours (33%), and were not theory informed (55%). A total of 36 behaviour change techniques were identified, most commonly <i>goal setting behaviour</i> and <i>self-monitoring of behaviour</i>. Subgroup analyses indicated that MHBC interventions delivered entirely face-to-face might not be as effective for physical activity outcomes, and not using <i>goal setting (behaviour)</i> might be more effective for smoking cessation outcomes. Meta-regressions indicated that a longer intervention duration may work best to achieve better physical activity outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of interventions and contributes to the field of MHBC by facilitating data-driven insights for future optimisation and dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-56"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes: a systematic review of qualitative studies. 确定与接受遗传性癌症综合征基因服务相关的社会心理障碍和促进因素:定性研究的系统回顾。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2415950
Sara Tasnim, Phoebe Xin Hui Lim, Konstadina Griva, Joanne Ngeow

Despite evidence supporting genetic testing's utility in hereditary cancer risk management, uptake remains low among at-risk relatives of a hereditary cancer patient. The qualitative systematic review aims to identify the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic counselling services and/or genetic testing (GC/GT). A systematic literature search was performed across six databases in June 2023, limited to studies published in English from 2010 onwards. Qualitative studies interviewing hereditary cancer patients, their relatives, and/or healthcare providers to identify the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndrome were eligible for inclusion. A thematic analysis was conducted on the extracted data from 41 eligible qualitative studies. 54% of the studies were from the United States and 75% of the participants were female. 14 psychosocial barriers and nine facilitators to the uptake of genetic testing services were identified. The most frequently cited psychosocial barriers to genetic testing uptake were 'emotional roller coaster', 'threat of genetic discrimination', and 'no perceived benefit of genetic testing'. In contrast, the most common facilitators were 'concern for family', 'easing personal worries', and 'knowledge is empowering'. Our findings reveal complex factors affecting GC/GT service uptake, some with dual effects.

尽管有证据支持基因检测在遗传性癌症风险管理中的作用,但遗传性癌症患者的高危亲属接受基因检测的比例仍然很低。本定性系统综述旨在确定与接受遗传咨询服务和/或基因检测(GC/GT)相关的社会心理障碍和促进因素。2023 年 6 月,我们在六个数据库中进行了系统性文献检索,仅限于 2010 年以后发表的英文研究。对遗传性癌症患者、其亲属和/或医疗服务提供者进行访谈,以确定与接受遗传性癌症综合征基因检测相关的社会心理障碍和促进因素的定性研究符合纳入条件。我们对从 41 项符合条件的定性研究中提取的数据进行了专题分析。54%的研究来自美国,75%的参与者为女性。研究确定了接受基因检测服务的 14 个社会心理障碍和 9 个促进因素。接受基因检测最常见的社会心理障碍是 "情绪过山车"、"基因歧视的威胁 "和 "认为基因检测没有好处"。相比之下,最常见的促进因素是 "对家人的关心"、"减轻个人忧虑 "和 "知识能增强能力"。我们的研究结果揭示了影响基因检测/基因治疗服务接受度的复杂因素,其中一些因素具有双重效应。
{"title":"Identifying the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes: a systematic review of qualitative studies.","authors":"Sara Tasnim, Phoebe Xin Hui Lim, Konstadina Griva, Joanne Ngeow","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2415950","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2415950","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite evidence supporting genetic testing's utility in hereditary cancer risk management, uptake remains low among at-risk relatives of a hereditary cancer patient. The qualitative systematic review aims to identify the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic counselling services and/or genetic testing (GC/GT). A systematic literature search was performed across six databases in June 2023, limited to studies published in English from 2010 onwards. Qualitative studies interviewing hereditary cancer patients, their relatives, and/or healthcare providers to identify the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndrome were eligible for inclusion. A thematic analysis was conducted on the extracted data from 41 eligible qualitative studies. 54% of the studies were from the United States and 75% of the participants were female. 14 psychosocial barriers and nine facilitators to the uptake of genetic testing services were identified. The most frequently cited psychosocial barriers to genetic testing uptake were 'emotional roller coaster', 'threat of genetic discrimination', and 'no perceived benefit of genetic testing'. In contrast, the most common facilitators were 'concern for family', 'easing personal worries', and 'knowledge is empowering'. Our findings reveal complex factors affecting GC/GT service uptake, some with dual effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protection motivation theory and health behaviour: conceptual review, discussion of limitations, and recommendations for best practice and future research. 保护动机理论与健康行为:概念回顾、局限性讨论以及最佳实践和未来研究建议。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2413011
Jessica Balla, Martin S Hagger

Protection motivation theory is a pre-eminent health behaviour theory purposed to predict participation in health protection and risk behaviours. It has been widely applied across multiple behaviours, populations and contexts. In this conceptual review, we summarise research applying the theory and identify shortcomings and evidence gaps that limit reported inferences and impede theory and intervention development. Accordingly, we provide recommendations for best practices and suggestions for future research to resolve these limitations. Limitations identified include a dearth of comprehensive theory tests, sparse evidence of theory sufficiency, a lack of studies including additional constructs, overuse of correlational and cross-sectional research designs, a paucity of intervention studies and tests of theory-consistent mechanisms of action, few tests intrapersonal and environmental moderators of theory effects and measurement concerns. We provide recommendations to address these limitations including conducting comprehensive theory tests in support of nomological validity; incorporating past behaviour and other constructs to establish theory sufficiency and extend its scope; adopting cross-lagged panel and factorial experimental research designs to test directional effects, permit better causal inference and test mechanisms of action; testing effects of moderators to identify conditions that may affect theory applicability and developing measurement standards for study constructs and adopting non-self-report behaviour measures.

保护动机理论是一种杰出的健康行为理论,旨在预测健康保护和风险行为的参与情况。该理论已被广泛应用于多种行为、人群和环境中。在这篇概念性综述中,我们总结了应用该理论进行的研究,并找出了限制报告推论、阻碍理论和干预措施发展的不足之处和证据差距。因此,我们提出了最佳实践建议和未来研究建议,以解决这些局限性。我们发现的局限性包括:缺乏全面的理论检验、理论充分性的证据稀少、缺乏包含额外建构的研究、过度使用相关性和横截面研究设计、缺乏干预研究和理论一致的作用机制检验、很少检验理论效应的个人和环境调节因素以及测量方面的问题。我们针对这些局限性提出了一些建议,包括进行全面的理论测试以支持名义有效性;纳入过去的行为和其他构造,以确定理论的充分性并扩大其范围;采用跨滞后面板和因子实验研究设计以测试方向性效应,允许更好的因果推论并测试作用机制;测试调节因素的效果以确定可能影响理论适用性的条件,以及为研究构造制定测量标准并采用非自我报告的行为测量方法。
{"title":"Protection motivation theory and health behaviour: conceptual review, discussion of limitations, and recommendations for best practice and future research.","authors":"Jessica Balla, Martin S Hagger","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2413011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2413011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protection motivation theory is a pre-eminent health behaviour theory purposed to predict participation in health protection and risk behaviours. It has been widely applied across multiple behaviours, populations and contexts. In this conceptual review, we summarise research applying the theory and identify shortcomings and evidence gaps that limit reported inferences and impede theory and intervention development. Accordingly, we provide recommendations for best practices and suggestions for future research to resolve these limitations. Limitations identified include a dearth of comprehensive theory tests, sparse evidence of theory sufficiency, a lack of studies including additional constructs, overuse of correlational and cross-sectional research designs, a paucity of intervention studies and tests of theory-consistent mechanisms of action, few tests intrapersonal and environmental moderators of theory effects and measurement concerns. We provide recommendations to address these limitations including conducting comprehensive theory tests in support of nomological validity; incorporating past behaviour and other constructs to establish theory sufficiency and extend its scope; adopting cross-lagged panel and factorial experimental research designs to test directional effects, permit better causal inference and test mechanisms of action; testing effects of moderators to identify conditions that may affect theory applicability and developing measurement standards for study constructs and adopting non-self-report behaviour measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inhibitory control training to reduce appetitive behaviour: a meta-analytic investigation of effectiveness, potential moderators, and underlying mechanisms of change. 抑制控制训练以减少食欲行为:对有效性、潜在调节因素和潜在变化机制的元分析调查。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2410018
Lauren H Iannazzo, Melissa J Hayden, Natalia S Lawrence, Naomi Kakoschke, Laura K Hughes, Kelly Van Egmond, Jarrad Lum, Petra K Staiger

Background/aims: Inhibitory control training (ICT) is a cognitive intervention that has been suggested to reduce problematic appetitive behaviours, such as unhealthy eating and excessive alcohol consumption. We conducted a meta-analytic review of ICT for reducing appetitive behaviours.

Methods: Two meta-analyses were conducted for behavioural (objective) outcomes and self-report outcomes, along with 14 moderator analyses, and two secondary analyses investigating changes in cue-devaluation and inhibitory control.

Results: The review included 46 articles (67 effect sizes and 4231 participants) and four appetitive health behaviours (eating, drinking, smoking, gambling). A significant effect of ICT on behavioural outcomes was found (SMD = 0.241, p .001). The self-report outcomes meta-analysis was not significant (p > .05). Secondary analyses also demonstrated greater inhibitory control (p < .05) and cue devaluation (p < .05) following ICT.

Conclusions: This meta-analytic review is the largest synthesis of ICT interventions for appetitive behaviours. ICT significantly reduced problematic eating behaviours when adopting behavioural outcomes, but this was not found for other appetitive behaviours. ICT also significantly improved inhibitory control and reduced cue evaluations. Further studies are required before drawing any conclusions regarding impacts on other appetitive behaviours.

背景/目的:抑制控制训练(ICT)是一种认知干预措施,被认为可以减少食欲问题行为,如不健康饮食和过度饮酒。我们对抑制控制训练用于减少食欲行为进行了一项荟萃分析综述:方法:我们对行为(客观)结果和自我报告结果进行了两项荟萃分析,同时还进行了 14 项调节因素分析,并对线索评估和抑制控制的变化进行了两项二次分析:综述包括 46 篇文章(67 个效应大小和 4231 名参与者)和四种食欲健康行为(饮食、饮酒、吸烟、赌博)。发现信息和通信技术对行为结果有明显影响(SMD = 0.241,p .001)。自我报告结果的荟萃分析结果不显著(P > .05)。二次分析还显示,在使用信息和通信技术后,抑制控制(p < .05)和线索贬值(p < .05)均有所增强:该荟萃分析综述是针对食欲行为的信息和通信技术干预措施的最大规模综述。在采用行为结果时,信息和通信技术大大减少了有问题的进食行为,但在其他食欲行为中却没有发现这种情况。信息和通信技术还能明显改善抑制控制,减少对暗示的评价。关于对其他食欲行为的影响,还需要进一步研究才能得出结论。
{"title":"Inhibitory control training to reduce appetitive behaviour: a meta-analytic investigation of effectiveness, potential moderators, and underlying mechanisms of change.","authors":"Lauren H Iannazzo, Melissa J Hayden, Natalia S Lawrence, Naomi Kakoschke, Laura K Hughes, Kelly Van Egmond, Jarrad Lum, Petra K Staiger","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2410018","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2410018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Inhibitory control training (ICT) is a cognitive intervention that has been suggested to reduce problematic appetitive behaviours, such as unhealthy eating and excessive alcohol consumption. We conducted a meta-analytic review of ICT for reducing appetitive behaviours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two meta-analyses were conducted for behavioural (objective) outcomes and self-report outcomes, along with 14 moderator analyses, and two secondary analyses investigating changes in cue-devaluation and inhibitory control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 46 articles (67 effect sizes and 4231 participants) and four appetitive health behaviours (eating, drinking, smoking, gambling). A significant effect of ICT on behavioural outcomes was found (SMD = 0.241, <i>p</i> .001). The self-report outcomes meta-analysis was not significant (<i>p</i> > .05). Secondary analyses also demonstrated greater inhibitory control (<i>p</i> < .05) and cue devaluation (<i>p</i> < .05) following ICT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analytic review is the largest synthesis of ICT interventions for appetitive behaviours. ICT significantly reduced problematic eating behaviours when adopting behavioural outcomes, but this was not found for other appetitive behaviours. ICT also significantly improved inhibitory control and reduced cue evaluations. Further studies are required before drawing any conclusions regarding impacts on other appetitive behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychosocial determinants of alternative protein choices: a meta-review. 替代蛋白质选择的社会心理决定因素:荟萃综述。
IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2412630
Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Maria Siwa, Anna Banik, Zofia Szczuka, Ewa Kulis, Francesca Grossi, Polymeros Chrysochou, Bjørn Tore Nystrand, Toula Perrea, Antonella Samoggia, Arlind Xhelili, Athanasios Krystallis, Aleksandra Luszczynska

This meta-review synthesises evidence concerning individual-level psychosocial characteristics associated with alternative protein food (APF) choices. We investigated the associations between: (i) individual-level determinants based on the COM-B model (capabilities, perceived opportunities, motivation), sociodemographic factors, and (ii) indicators of APF choices (e.g., intention to eat, buy, pay, acceptance, intake). Differences in characteristics of APF made from plants, insects, mushrooms, and other APF sources were explored. Thirteen databases were searched in this pre-registered (CRD42023388694) meta-review and 28 reviews were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool. For plant-based APF choices, consistent support was obtained for associations with (i) capabilities, including cooking skills, exposure to/familiarity with APF; (ii) motivations, including perceived health-related, pro-environmental, and sustainability benefits, and animal welfare; (iii) younger age and higher education. For insect-based APF choices, consistent support was obtained for (i) capabilities, including formal knowledge about APF, exposure to/familiarity with APF; (ii) perceived opportunities, encompassing positive social and cultural norms, distrust in technology; (iii) motivations, including perceived health benefits, pro-environmental and sustainability benefits, perceived health risks, being adventurous/daring, curiosity, neophilia, disgust; (iv) male gender and younger age. Recognising differences in potential determinants across various APF sources is essential for designing interventions aimed at promoting APF uptake.

本综述综合了与替代蛋白质食品(APF)选择相关的个人社会心理特征方面的证据。我们研究了:(i) 基于 COM-B 模型的个人层面决定因素(能力、感知机会、动机)、社会人口因素和 (ii) APF 选择指标(如食用、购买、支付、接受、摄入的意向)之间的关联。研究还探讨了由植物、昆虫、蘑菇和其他 APF 来源制成的 APF 的特征差异。本次预先注册(CRD42023388694)的荟萃综述检索了 13 个数据库,共纳入 28 篇综述。采用 ROBIS 工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。对于植物性 APF 的选择,以下因素的相关性得到一致支持:(i) 能力,包括烹饪技能、对 APF 的接触/熟悉程度;(ii) 动机,包括感知到的健康相关益处、环保益处、可持续性益处以及动物福利;(iii) 年龄较小和教育程度较高。对于昆虫类杀伤性武器的选择,以下因素得到了一致支持:(i) 能力,包括对杀伤性武器的正式了解、接触/熟悉杀伤性武器;(ii) 感知到的机会,包括积极的社会和文化规范、对技术的不信任;(iii) 动机,包括感知到的健康益处、有利于环境和可持续发展的益处、感知到的健康风险、冒险/大胆、好奇、恋新、厌恶;(iv) 男性性别和较年轻。认识到各种杀伤人员地雷来源的潜在决定因素之间的差异,对于设计旨在促进杀伤人员地雷吸收的干预措施至关重要。
{"title":"Psychosocial determinants of alternative protein choices: a meta-review.","authors":"Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Maria Siwa, Anna Banik, Zofia Szczuka, Ewa Kulis, Francesca Grossi, Polymeros Chrysochou, Bjørn Tore Nystrand, Toula Perrea, Antonella Samoggia, Arlind Xhelili, Athanasios Krystallis, Aleksandra Luszczynska","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2412630","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2412630","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This meta-review synthesises evidence concerning individual-level psychosocial characteristics associated with alternative protein food (APF) choices. We investigated the associations between: (i) individual-level determinants based on the COM-B model (capabilities, perceived opportunities, motivation), sociodemographic factors, and (ii) indicators of APF choices (e.g., intention to eat, buy, pay, acceptance, intake). Differences in characteristics of APF made from plants, insects, mushrooms, and other APF sources were explored. Thirteen databases were searched in this pre-registered (CRD42023388694) meta-review and 28 reviews were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool. For <i>plant-based APF</i> choices, consistent support was obtained for associations with (i) capabilities, including cooking skills, exposure to/familiarity with APF; (ii) motivations, including perceived health-related, pro-environmental, and sustainability benefits, and animal welfare; (iii) younger age and higher education. For <i>insect-based APF</i> choices, consistent support was obtained for (i) capabilities, including formal knowledge about APF, exposure to/familiarity with APF; (ii) perceived opportunities, encompassing positive social and cultural norms, distrust in technology; (iii) motivations, including perceived health benefits, pro-environmental and sustainability benefits, perceived health risks, being adventurous/daring, curiosity, neophilia, disgust; (iv) male gender and younger age. Recognising differences in potential determinants across various APF sources is essential for designing interventions aimed at promoting APF uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142394295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Health Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1