Pub Date : 2024-08-06DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2383758
Luke Peddie, Vincent Gosselin Boucher, E Jean Buckler, Matt Noseworthy, Brook L Haight, Spencer Pratt, Boaz Injege, Michael Koehle, Guy Faulkner, Eli Puterman
Exercise and nature exposure are independently recognised for their positive relationship with health, but their combined effects are not fully understood. The present review summarises the evidence that compares physiological and perceptual differences of a single bout of exercise performed outdoors versus indoors. Nine databases were searched for articles published before March 2021 which utilised controlled designs to assess at least one physiological outcome during or after a single acute bout of outdoor exercise. When appropriate, quantitative analyses were completed. Quality of articles was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The findings of 38 articles (Total N = 1168) were examined. Participants were primarily healthy. Summarised outcomes included objective exercise intensity, perceived exertion, performance, neuroendocrine and metabolic responses, cardiovascular responses, thermoregulation, enjoyment, intention for future exercise, and perceptions of the environment. Outdoor environments increased enjoyment (N = 234, K = 10, g = 1.24, 95% CI = [0.59, 1.89], p < 0.001). Findings for remaining outcomes were non-significant or inconclusive and challenging to interpret due to high risk of bias. Overall, outdoor exercise appears to feel more enjoyable than indoor exercise when matched for intensity, with equivocal physiological benefit.
{"title":"Acute effects of outdoor versus indoor exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Luke Peddie, Vincent Gosselin Boucher, E Jean Buckler, Matt Noseworthy, Brook L Haight, Spencer Pratt, Boaz Injege, Michael Koehle, Guy Faulkner, Eli Puterman","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2383758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2383758","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise and nature exposure are independently recognised for their positive relationship with health, but their combined effects are not fully understood. The present review summarises the evidence that compares physiological and perceptual differences of a single bout of exercise performed outdoors versus indoors. Nine databases were searched for articles published before March 2021 which utilised controlled designs to assess at least one physiological outcome during or after a single acute bout of outdoor exercise. When appropriate, quantitative analyses were completed. Quality of articles was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The findings of 38 articles (Total <i>N</i> = 1168) were examined. Participants were primarily healthy. Summarised outcomes included objective exercise intensity, perceived exertion, performance, neuroendocrine and metabolic responses, cardiovascular responses, thermoregulation, enjoyment, intention for future exercise, and perceptions of the environment. Outdoor environments increased enjoyment (<i>N</i> = 234, <i>K</i> = 10, <i>g</i> = 1.24, 95% CI = [0.59, 1.89], <i>p</i> < 0.001). Findings for remaining outcomes were non-significant or inconclusive and challenging to interpret due to high risk of bias. Overall, outdoor exercise appears to feel more enjoyable than indoor exercise when matched for intensity, with equivocal physiological benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-05DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2385525
Sarah Chapman, Lisbeth Frostholm, Trudie Chalder, Christopher Graham, Annette de Thurah, Tess van Leeuwen, Majbritt Mostrup Pedersen, Tina Carstensen, John Weinman
ABSTRACTMedication nonadherence is common and results in avoidable morbidity, mortality, and burdens on healthcare systems. This paper proposes a preventative approach to medication nonadherence. We consider existing evidence on the prevalence and determinants of nonadherence early in a patient's medication-taking journey, and map these to potential opportunities for intervention. Many patients stop taking a new medication soon after they are prescribed it, often not collecting the medication. Early patterns of nonadherence are linked to later nonadherence via processes such as habit formation and symptom experiences. Known predictors of nonadherence may be present before someone starts a new treatment, when patients experience disruption to their lives and identity due to illness. Healthcare professionals typically have contact with patients around this time. We argue that it may be possible to prevent medication nonadherence: at the population level; by optimising the prescription process; and through low- and high-intensity interventions for patients with identified early barriers. We give examples of specific interventions and tools that might be needed to operationalise this approach in practice and propose new directions for research to promote early engagement with medication to prevent nonadherence.
{"title":"Preventing medication nonadherence: a framework for interventions to support early engagement with treatment.","authors":"Sarah Chapman, Lisbeth Frostholm, Trudie Chalder, Christopher Graham, Annette de Thurah, Tess van Leeuwen, Majbritt Mostrup Pedersen, Tina Carstensen, John Weinman","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2385525","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2385525","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Medication nonadherence is common and results in avoidable morbidity, mortality, and burdens on healthcare systems. This paper proposes a preventative approach to medication nonadherence. We consider existing evidence on the prevalence and determinants of nonadherence early in a patient's medication-taking journey, and map these to potential opportunities for intervention. Many patients stop taking a new medication soon after they are prescribed it, often not collecting the medication. Early patterns of nonadherence are linked to later nonadherence via processes such as habit formation and symptom experiences. Known predictors of nonadherence may be present before someone starts a new treatment, when patients experience disruption to their lives and identity due to illness. Healthcare professionals typically have contact with patients around this time. We argue that it may be possible to prevent medication nonadherence: at the population level; by optimising the prescription process; and through low- and high-intensity interventions for patients with identified early barriers. We give examples of specific interventions and tools that might be needed to operationalise this approach in practice and propose new directions for research to promote early engagement with medication to prevent nonadherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2383224
Sajjad Kabir, Elizabeth A Newnham, Ashraf Dewan, Keegan Qi Xian Kok, Takeshi Hamamura
This systematic review assesses the relationship between climate induced coastal hazards and psychological well-being of communities in the Asia-Pacific region. The review synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2020, encompassing data from seven countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, and Vietnam. Results reveals a robust negative association between exposure to coastal hazards and psychological outcomes, notably stress, depression, anxiety, and distress. Most of the studies (77%) corroborate negative impacts of coastal hazards on psychological health. Additionally, 69% of the reviewed articles suggest a correlation between coastal hazards and negative outcomes for community livelihoods and essential resources. The review highlights increased psychological vulnerability among marginalised subpopulations, such as economically disadvantaged communities, a trend supported by 92% of the examined articles. The findings indicates that factors such as environmental vulnerability, resource availability, community traits, and coping methods are important in determining whether a community can effectively handle coastal hazards or face increased psychological health risks. This research aligns with international health frameworks, including the World Health Organization's Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management guidelines. However, a notable research gap emerges - the absence of studies that specifically explore psychological responses of communities to ongoing climate-related coastal hazards, such as sea-level rise. These findings emphasise an urgent need for targeted research to guide comprehensive, multidisciplinary policy interventions aimed at mitigating the psychological and socio-economic repercussions of climate-related coastal hazards.
{"title":"Climate hazards and psychological health among coastal communities in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.","authors":"Sajjad Kabir, Elizabeth A Newnham, Ashraf Dewan, Keegan Qi Xian Kok, Takeshi Hamamura","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2383224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2383224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review assesses the relationship between climate induced coastal hazards and psychological well-being of communities in the Asia-Pacific region. The review synthesises findings from 13 peer-reviewed articles published between 2007 and 2020, encompassing data from seven countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, and Vietnam. Results reveals a robust negative association between exposure to coastal hazards and psychological outcomes, notably stress, depression, anxiety, and distress. Most of the studies (77%) corroborate negative impacts of coastal hazards on psychological health. Additionally, 69% of the reviewed articles suggest a correlation between coastal hazards and negative outcomes for community livelihoods and essential resources. The review highlights increased psychological vulnerability among marginalised subpopulations, such as economically disadvantaged communities, a trend supported by 92% of the examined articles. The findings indicates that factors such as environmental vulnerability, resource availability, community traits, and coping methods are important in determining whether a community can effectively handle coastal hazards or face increased psychological health risks. This research aligns with international health frameworks, including the World Health Organization's Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management guidelines. However, a notable research gap emerges - the absence of studies that specifically explore psychological responses of communities to ongoing climate-related coastal hazards, such as sea-level rise. These findings emphasise an urgent need for targeted research to guide comprehensive, multidisciplinary policy interventions aimed at mitigating the psychological and socio-economic repercussions of climate-related coastal hazards.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2379784
Jake Linardon, Joseph Firth, John Torous, Mariel Messer, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz
The management of stress has evolved in recent years due to widespread availability of mobile-device applications (apps) and their capacity to deliver psychological interventions. We evaluated the efficacy of mental health apps on stress and sought to identify characteristics associated with effect size estimates. Sixty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Random effects meta-analyses were performed and putative moderators were examined at univariate and multivariate (combinations and interactions) levels. From 78 comparisons, we observed a small but significant pooled effect of apps over control conditions on perceived stress levels (g = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.20, 0.34; I2 = 68%). This effect weakened after taking into account small-study bias according to the trim-and-fill procedure (g = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.19; I2 = 78%). Delivery of apps with stress monitoring features produced smaller efficacy estimates, although this association interacted with other trial features (small sample size and inactive control group) in multivariate analyses, suggesting that this effect may have been explained by features characteristic of low-quality trials. Mental health apps appear to have small, acute effects on reducing perceived stress. Future research should shift focus towards identifying change mechanisms, longitudinal outcomes, features that facilitate sustained app usage, and tangible pathways to integrating apps into real-world clinical settings.
{"title":"Efficacy of mental health smartphone apps on stress levels: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Jake Linardon, Joseph Firth, John Torous, Mariel Messer, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2379784","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2379784","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of stress has evolved in recent years due to widespread availability of mobile-device applications (apps) and their capacity to deliver psychological interventions. We evaluated the efficacy of mental health apps on stress and sought to identify characteristics associated with effect size estimates. Sixty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Random effects meta-analyses were performed and putative moderators were examined at univariate and multivariate (combinations and interactions) levels. From 78 comparisons, we observed a small but significant pooled effect of apps over control conditions on perceived stress levels (<i>g</i> = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.20, 0.34; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 68%). This effect weakened after taking into account small-study bias according to the trim-and-fill procedure (<i>g</i> = 0.10; 95% CI = 0.02, 0.19; <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 78%). Delivery of apps with stress monitoring features produced smaller efficacy estimates, although this association interacted with other trial features (small sample size and inactive control group) in multivariate analyses, suggesting that this effect may have been explained by features characteristic of low-quality trials. Mental health apps appear to have small, acute effects on reducing perceived stress. Future research should shift focus towards identifying change mechanisms, longitudinal outcomes, features that facilitate sustained app usage, and tangible pathways to integrating apps into real-world clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141749348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-26DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2367613
Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Jen O'Shea, Stephen Kennedy, Siobhan D Thomas, Kerry Avery, Molly Byrne, Sheena McHugh, Daryl B O' Connor, Ian J Saldanha, Valerie Smith, Elaine Toomey, Kerry Dwan, Jamie J Kirkham
Selective outcome reporting can result in overestimation of treatment effects, research waste, and reduced openness and transparency. This review aimed to examine selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions and determine potential outcome reporting bias. A review of nine health psychology and behavioural medicine journals was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of behavioural health interventions published since 2019. Discrepancies in outcome reporting were observed in 90% of the 29 trials with corresponding registrations/protocols. Discrepancies included 72% of trials omitting prespecified outcomes; 55% of trials introduced new outcomes. Thirty-eight percent of trials omitted prespecified and introduced new outcomes. Three trials (10%) downgraded primary outcomes in registrations/protocols to secondary outcomes in final reports; downgraded outcomes were not statistically significant in two trials. Five trials (17%) upgraded secondary outcomes to primary outcomes; upgraded outcomes were statistically significant in all trials. In final reports, three trials (7%) omitted outcomes from the methods section; three trials (7%) introduced new outcomes in results that were not in the methods. These findings indicate that selective outcome reporting is a problem in behavioural health intervention trials. Journal- and trialist-level approaches are needed to minimise selective outcome reporting in health psychology and behavioural medicine.
{"title":"Selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions in health psychology and behavioural medicine journals: a review.","authors":"Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Jen O'Shea, Stephen Kennedy, Siobhan D Thomas, Kerry Avery, Molly Byrne, Sheena McHugh, Daryl B O' Connor, Ian J Saldanha, Valerie Smith, Elaine Toomey, Kerry Dwan, Jamie J Kirkham","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2367613","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2367613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Selective outcome reporting can result in overestimation of treatment effects, research waste, and reduced openness and transparency. This review aimed to examine selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions and determine potential outcome reporting bias. A review of nine health psychology and behavioural medicine journals was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials of behavioural health interventions published since 2019. Discrepancies in outcome reporting were observed in 90% of the 29 trials with corresponding registrations/protocols. Discrepancies included 72% of trials omitting prespecified outcomes; 55% of trials introduced new outcomes. Thirty-eight percent of trials omitted prespecified <i>and</i> introduced new outcomes. Three trials (10%) downgraded primary outcomes in registrations/protocols to secondary outcomes in final reports; downgraded outcomes were not statistically significant in two trials. Five trials (17%) upgraded secondary outcomes to primary outcomes; upgraded outcomes were statistically significant in all trials. In final reports, three trials (7%) omitted outcomes from the methods section; three trials (7%) introduced new outcomes in results that were not in the methods. These findings indicate that selective outcome reporting is a problem in behavioural health intervention trials. Journal- and trialist-level approaches are needed to minimise selective outcome reporting in health psychology and behavioural medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141459957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-18DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2366189
Corinna Leppin, Tosan Okpako, Jamie Brown, Claire Garnett, Olga Perski
Prior research indicates that digital smoking cessation interventions can be effective, but little is known about their active ingredients. Therefore, this review aimed to examine the associations ...
先前的研究表明,数字化戒烟干预措施可能有效,但人们对其有效成分知之甚少。因此,本综述旨在研究...
{"title":"Does socioeconomic position moderate the associations between the content and delivery features of digital behaviour change interventions for smoking cessation and intervention effectiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Corinna Leppin, Tosan Okpako, Jamie Brown, Claire Garnett, Olga Perski","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2366189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2366189","url":null,"abstract":"Prior research indicates that digital smoking cessation interventions can be effective, but little is known about their active ingredients. Therefore, this review aimed to examine the associations ...","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141501401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-08-07DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2236180
Laurel P Gibson, Emily B Kramer, Jordan Wrigley, Maxwell Probst, Angela D Bryan
Considerable research has examined how involvement in gay-affiliated communities is associated with sexual health behaviours in sexual minority men (i.e., gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men), yet findings in this domain are often contradictory and inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to (a) synthesise the related empirical literature, and (b) identify potential factors driving inconsistent findings. Peer-reviewed publications were included if they contained quantitative data and at least one measure of the statistical association between gay community involvement and sexual health behaviour. The search strategy was implemented in six databases and returned 6,409 articles, of which 86 met the inclusion criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity in how gay community involvement was assessed across studies. Although gay community involvement was consistently associated with greater engagement in protective behaviours across studies, the association between gay community involvement and risk behaviours appeared to depend on how gay community involvement was conceptualised and measured (e.g., nightlife involvement vs. political activism). Findings emphasise a need for studies that employ validated measures that reflect the multidimensional nature of gay community involvement, as well as research designs better suited to address the causal effects of community involvement on HIV/STI transmission and prevention.
{"title":"Gay community involvement and the sexual health behaviours of sexual minority men: a systematic review and directions for future research.","authors":"Laurel P Gibson, Emily B Kramer, Jordan Wrigley, Maxwell Probst, Angela D Bryan","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2236180","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2236180","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considerable research has examined how involvement in gay-affiliated communities is associated with sexual health behaviours in sexual minority men (i.e., gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men), yet findings in this domain are often contradictory and inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to (a) synthesise the related empirical literature, and (b) identify potential factors driving inconsistent findings. Peer-reviewed publications were included if they contained quantitative data and at least one measure of the statistical association between gay community involvement and sexual health behaviour. The search strategy was implemented in six databases and returned 6,409 articles, of which 86 met the inclusion criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity in how gay community involvement was assessed across studies. Although gay community involvement was consistently associated with greater engagement in <i>protective</i> behaviours across studies, the association between gay community involvement and <i>risk</i> behaviours appeared to depend on how gay community involvement was conceptualised and measured (e.g., nightlife involvement vs. political activism). Findings emphasise a need for studies that employ validated measures that reflect the multidimensional nature of gay community involvement, as well as research designs better suited to address the causal effects of community involvement on HIV/STI transmission and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"299-318"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10306942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-05-09DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2208652
Andrea Ballesio, Andrea Zagaria, Cristiano Violani, Caterina Lombardo
High variability of influenza vaccine efficacy requires the identification of modulators of immunisation that may be targeted as adjuvants in health psychology interventions. Psychosocial and behavioural variables such as psychological stress, greater negative and lower positive affectivity, poor sleep, loneliness, and lack of social support, have been associated with abnormal immune and inflammatory responses and negative health outcomes, yet their effects in modulating vaccine efficacy are yet to be fully understood. We conducted an updated systematic review of longitudinal and experimental studies examining the effects of such variables in predicting immune response to influenza vaccine. PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus were searched up to November 2022. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis and 16 provided data for meta-analysis. Low positive and high negative affect were associated with low antibodies and weak cell-mediated immunity following vaccination in qualitative synthesis. Literature on sleep disturbance, loneliness and social support was limited and yielded inconsistent results. Psychological stress was associated with poorer antibody response in meta-analysis. In conclusion, findings from this review suggest a need for further longitudinal and experimental studies on these factors to support their inclusion as target variables in vaccine adjuvant interventions.
{"title":"Psychosocial and behavioural predictors of immune response to influenza vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrea Ballesio, Andrea Zagaria, Cristiano Violani, Caterina Lombardo","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2208652","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2208652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High variability of influenza vaccine efficacy requires the identification of modulators of immunisation that may be targeted as adjuvants in health psychology interventions. Psychosocial and behavioural variables such as psychological stress, greater negative and lower positive affectivity, poor sleep, loneliness, and lack of social support, have been associated with abnormal immune and inflammatory responses and negative health outcomes, yet their effects in modulating vaccine efficacy are yet to be fully understood. We conducted an updated systematic review of longitudinal and experimental studies examining the effects of such variables in predicting immune response to influenza vaccine. PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus were searched up to November 2022. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis and 16 provided data for meta-analysis. Low positive and high negative affect were associated with low antibodies and weak cell-mediated immunity following vaccination in qualitative synthesis. Literature on sleep disturbance, loneliness and social support was limited and yielded inconsistent results. Psychological stress was associated with poorer antibody response in meta-analysis. In conclusion, findings from this review suggest a need for further longitudinal and experimental studies on these factors to support their inclusion as target variables in vaccine adjuvant interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"255-284"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9430872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-07-10DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2233592
Kelley Strohacker, Gorden Sudeck, Richard Keegan, Adam H Ibrahim, Cory T Beaumont
There is a growing focus on developing person-adaptive strategies to support sustained exercise behaviour, necessitating conceptual models to guide future research and applications. This paper introduces Flexible nonlinear periodisation (FNLP) - a proposed, but underdeveloped person-adaptive model originating in sport-specific conditioning - that, pending empirical refinement and evaluation, may be applied in health promotion and disease prevention settings. To initiate such efforts, the procedures of FNLP (i.e., acutely and dynamically matching exercise demand to individual assessments of mental and physical readiness) are integrated with contemporary health behaviour evidence and theory to propose a modified FNLP model and to show hypothesised pathways by which FNLP may support exercise adherence (e.g., flexible goal setting, management of affective responses, and provision of autonomy/variety-support). Considerations for future research are also provided to guide iterative, evidence-based efforts for further development, acceptability, implementation, and evaluation.
{"title":"Contextualising flexible nonlinear periodization as a person-adaptive behavioral model for exercise maintenance.","authors":"Kelley Strohacker, Gorden Sudeck, Richard Keegan, Adam H Ibrahim, Cory T Beaumont","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2233592","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2233592","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing focus on developing person-adaptive strategies to support sustained exercise behaviour, necessitating conceptual models to guide future research and applications. This paper introduces Flexible nonlinear periodisation (FNLP) - a proposed, but underdeveloped person-adaptive model originating in sport-specific conditioning - that, pending empirical refinement and evaluation, may be applied in health promotion and disease prevention settings. To initiate such efforts, the procedures of FNLP (i.e., acutely and dynamically matching exercise demand to individual assessments of mental and physical readiness) are integrated with contemporary health behaviour evidence and theory to propose a modified FNLP model and to show hypothesised pathways by which FNLP may support exercise adherence (e.g., flexible goal setting, management of affective responses, and provision of autonomy/variety-support). Considerations for future research are also provided to guide iterative, evidence-based efforts for further development, acceptability, implementation, and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"285-298"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9764547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-03-15DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2185654
Ying Lau, Han Shi Jocelyn Chew, Wei How Darryl Ang, Wen Wei Ang, Chin Yi Yeo, Grace Zhi Qi Lim, Sai Ho Wong, Siew Tiang Lau, Ling Jie Cheng
Evidence about the effects of digital health interventions (DHIs) on the psychological outcomes of perinatal women is increasing but remains inconsistent. An umbrella review was conducted to (1) assess the effect of DHIs on depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms and (2) compare the effects of DHIs on different digital platforms and population natures. Ten databases were searched from inception until December 23, 2022. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects meta-analyses were utilised. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2). Twenty-four systematic reviews with 41 meta-analyses involving 45,509 perinatal women from 264 primary studies were included. The credibility of the evidence of meta-analyses was rated as highly suggestive (4.88%), suggestive (26.83%), weak (51.22%) or non-significant (17.07%) according to AMSTAR-2. Our findings suggest that DHIs are beneficial for reducing stress symptoms. However, conflicting effects were found on anxiety symptoms. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses suggested that DHIs effectively improve depressive symptoms in postnatal women, and DHIs using the website platform are highly effective in stress reduction. DHIs can be implemented adjuvant to usual obstetric care to improve depressive and stress symptoms. Additional well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted.
{"title":"Effects of digital health interventions on the psychological outcomes of perinatal women: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.","authors":"Ying Lau, Han Shi Jocelyn Chew, Wei How Darryl Ang, Wen Wei Ang, Chin Yi Yeo, Grace Zhi Qi Lim, Sai Ho Wong, Siew Tiang Lau, Ling Jie Cheng","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2185654","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17437199.2023.2185654","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence about the effects of digital health interventions (DHIs) on the psychological outcomes of perinatal women is increasing but remains inconsistent. An umbrella review was conducted to (1) assess the effect of DHIs on depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms and (2) compare the effects of DHIs on different digital platforms and population natures. Ten databases were searched from inception until December 23, 2022. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random-effects meta-analyses were utilised. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2). Twenty-four systematic reviews with 41 meta-analyses involving 45,509 perinatal women from 264 primary studies were included. The credibility of the evidence of meta-analyses was rated as highly suggestive (4.88%), suggestive (26.83%), weak (51.22%) or non-significant (17.07%) according to AMSTAR-2. Our findings suggest that DHIs are beneficial for reducing stress symptoms. However, conflicting effects were found on anxiety symptoms. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses suggested that DHIs effectively improve depressive symptoms in postnatal women, and DHIs using the website platform are highly effective in stress reduction. DHIs can be implemented adjuvant to usual obstetric care to improve depressive and stress symptoms. Additional well-designed RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"229-254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9169421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}