Ha Ta, Terry L. Esper, Adriana Rossiter Hofer, Annibal Sodero
Thanks to increased technological advancements, retailers have progressively incorporated crowdsourcing into their delivery service portfolios to offer customers an enhanced last-mile delivery experience. Yet, while studies have explored the unique operational attributes of the crowdsourced delivery (CD) model in online retailing, the literature remains scant on how customers respond to the usage of this emerging delivery service. Building on the cognitive appraisal theory and e-Logistics Service Quality (e-LSQ) literatures, this study applies middle-range theorizing to examine differences between customers' appraisals of e-LSQ dimensions of CD and traditional delivery methods, and what types of products being delivered make such differences more pronounced. Our analysis of a large sample of customers' reviews across multiple retailers reveals that customers exhibit higher appraisal levels of timeliness, price, and reliability of delivery services when CD is used. Results also indicate that appraisals are more pronounced for timeliness and price of deliveries of high-turnover products that require minimal time and effort to purchase. Our findings, as such, underscore the power of CD as a tool to enhance customer experience and unveil potential opportunities for effective CD use in customer segmentation strategies.
{"title":"Crowdsourced delivery and customer assessments of e-Logistics Service Quality: An appraisal theory perspective","authors":"Ha Ta, Terry L. Esper, Adriana Rossiter Hofer, Annibal Sodero","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12327","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12327","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Thanks to increased technological advancements, retailers have progressively incorporated crowdsourcing into their delivery service portfolios to offer customers an enhanced last-mile delivery experience. Yet, while studies have explored the unique operational attributes of the crowdsourced delivery (CD) model in online retailing, the literature remains scant on how customers respond to the usage of this emerging delivery service. Building on the cognitive appraisal theory and e-Logistics Service Quality (e-LSQ) literatures, this study applies middle-range theorizing to examine differences between customers' appraisals of e-LSQ dimensions of CD and traditional delivery methods, and what types of products being delivered make such differences more pronounced. Our analysis of a large sample of customers' reviews across multiple retailers reveals that customers exhibit higher appraisal levels of timeliness, price, and reliability of delivery services when CD is used. Results also indicate that appraisals are more pronounced for timeliness and price of deliveries of high-turnover products that require minimal time and effort to purchase. Our findings, as such, underscore the power of CD as a tool to enhance customer experience and unveil potential opportunities for effective CD use in customer segmentation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 3","pages":"345-368"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46428863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Colin B. Gabler, V. Myles Landers, Raj Agnihotri, Tyler R. Morgan
Frontline employees (FLEs) are the face of every organization in the supply chain, and therefore, supply chain partners understand each other's environmental values through these interactions. An environmental orientation conveys a firm's commitment to the natural environment to both internal and external stakeholders along the supply chain. Building upon social identity theory within a boundary-spanning perspective, we estimate a model which examines how this firm-level orientation leads to FLE's environmental identification. These FLEs work harder and are more satisfied at higher levels of identification, which ultimately translates to perceptions of higher-quality products and prosocial impact. FLE's perceptions of ethical leadership and trust in their organization moderate this serial mediation model. Together, we provide insights into the benefits of frontline employees who identify with an environmental organization.
{"title":"Environmental orientation on the frontline: A boundary-spanning perspective for supply chain management","authors":"Colin B. Gabler, V. Myles Landers, Raj Agnihotri, Tyler R. Morgan","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12328","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12328","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Frontline employees (FLEs) are the face of every organization in the supply chain, and therefore, supply chain partners understand each other's environmental values through these interactions. An environmental orientation conveys a firm's commitment to the natural environment to both internal and external stakeholders along the supply chain. Building upon social identity theory within a boundary-spanning perspective, we estimate a model which examines how this firm-level orientation leads to FLE's environmental identification. These FLEs work harder and are more satisfied at higher levels of identification, which ultimately translates to perceptions of higher-quality products and prosocial impact. FLE's perceptions of ethical leadership and trust in their organization moderate this serial mediation model. Together, we provide insights into the benefits of frontline employees who identify with an environmental organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 3","pages":"369-386"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45381359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sreedhar Madhavaram, Kerry T. Manis, Siavash Rashidi-Sabet, Daniel F. Taylor
Effective supply chain management (SCM) capabilities are critical to the success of organizations. Although research over the past three decades (i) firmly establishes that SCM plays a significant role in corporate strategy, (ii) either suggests and/or finds strong positive results for the impact of different types of SCM capabilities on firm performance, and (iii) indicates that intra-firm and inter-firm capabilities are central to the effectiveness of SCM, how firms come to have the SCM capabilities stays somewhat underexplored. Therefore, to understand how firms can bundle effective SCM capabilities, we (i) develop a brief overview of capabilities research, (ii) use the subprocesses of capability bundling—stabilizing (building), enriching (developing), and pioneering (creating)—as a framework for reviewing SCM research, (iii) review 236 articles from 66 journals to develop an integrative framework of capability bundling for SCM effectiveness, (iv) discuss the findings from the review for SCM capability bundling, and (v) delineate a comprehensive research agenda that provides specific insights into how firms can come to have SCM capabilities for competitive advantages in the marketplace. In doing so, we hope to initiate a silo-breaking, cross-disciplinary research program on how firms bundle capabilities for competitive advantages.
{"title":"Capability bundling for effective supply chain management: An integrative framework and research agenda","authors":"Sreedhar Madhavaram, Kerry T. Manis, Siavash Rashidi-Sabet, Daniel F. Taylor","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12329","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12329","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective supply chain management (SCM) capabilities are critical to the success of organizations. Although research over the past three decades (i) firmly establishes that SCM plays a significant role in corporate strategy, (ii) either suggests and/or finds strong positive results for the impact of different types of SCM capabilities on firm performance, and (iii) indicates that intra-firm and inter-firm capabilities are central to the effectiveness of SCM, how firms come to have the SCM capabilities stays somewhat underexplored. Therefore, to understand how firms can bundle effective SCM capabilities, we (i) develop a brief overview of capabilities research, (ii) use the subprocesses of capability bundling—stabilizing (building), enriching (developing), and pioneering (creating)—as a framework for reviewing SCM research, (iii) review 236 articles from 66 journals to develop an integrative framework of capability bundling for SCM effectiveness, (iv) discuss the findings from the review for SCM capability bundling, and (v) delineate a comprehensive research agenda that provides specific insights into how firms can come to have SCM capabilities for competitive advantages in the marketplace. In doing so, we hope to initiate a silo-breaking, cross-disciplinary research program on how firms bundle capabilities for competitive advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 2","pages":"170-197"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42222270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) populations often lack access to the products and markets that would allow progress toward sustainable development goals (SDGs) (Prahalad & Hart, Strategy + Business, 2002, 26 and 1). Recognizing the fundamental role of logistics/supply chain management (LSCM) in providing such access, we review 84 case studies of development initiatives targeted at the BOP. Surprisingly, we find that LSCM has low visibility in most cases, although distribution is frequently mentioned and LSCM is a more central actor in the few cases where BOP locations are a source for low-cost products.
金字塔底层(BOP)人口通常无法获得产品和市场,从而无法实现可持续发展目标(sdg)。Hart, Strategy + Business, 2002, 26 and 1).认识到物流/供应链管理(LSCM)在提供这种途径方面的基本作用,我们回顾了84个针对BOP的发展计划的案例研究。令人惊讶的是,我们发现LSCM在大多数情况下具有较低的可见性,尽管分布经常被提及,并且LSCM在BOP位置作为低成本产品来源的少数情况下扮演着更重要的角色。
{"title":"Logistics and supply chain management in base of the pyramid projects","authors":"Adegoke Oke, Arnold Maltz, Jarrod Goentzel","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12326","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12326","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) populations often lack access to the products and markets that would allow progress toward sustainable development goals (SDGs) (Prahalad & Hart, <i>Strategy + Business</i>, 2002, 26 and 1). Recognizing the fundamental role of logistics/supply chain management (LSCM) in providing such access, we review 84 case studies of development initiatives targeted at the BOP. Surprisingly, we find that LSCM has low visibility in most cases, although distribution is frequently mentioned and LSCM is a more central actor in the few cases where BOP locations are a source for low-cost products.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 3","pages":"323-344"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48492912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Over the past decade, many manuscripts and editorial opinions have been written that worry about academic research is not being relevant to management. This cascading complaint is relevant to research across most business disciplines. As our writings become more theoretically esoteric and our methods become more distant from the manager, authors (Hawkins et al., <span>2022</span>), deans, politicians, and now accreditation agencies (Richey & Davis-Sramek, <span>2022</span>) are increasingly asking for an accounting of the value provided by investing in academic research. The current highly flawed measurement of research impact is adjusting to the demands of our increasingly interested stakeholders. Now more than ever, our research must have an impact beyond our hallowed academic halls.</p><p>At the <i>Journal of Business Logistics</i> (<i>JBL</i>), strong theoretical and methodological rigor are the price of admission, but we are also pleased to publish articles that provide implications for industry (Davis-Sramek & Richey, <span>2022</span>). Submissions without managerial implications are consistently desk rejected, but the papers published in JBL are getting serious attention. We note the rapid growth of executives viewing <i>JBL</i> article summaries that we post on our social media accounts as an important avenue to inform business practice. In fact, the <i>JBL</i> LinkedIn account has grown to nearly 2000 followers in just over a year. Only about a third of the individuals following the <i>JBL</i> LinkedIn account are academics (https://www.linkedin.com/company/journal-of-business-logisticss/). This was a pleasant surprise and provides us with another route to support the work of <i>JBL</i> authors.</p><p>Of course, academia and business represent two of the largest <i>JBL</i> stakeholders, but there is another stakeholder group that is ripe for enhanced prospective and retrospective learning about our research – our government officials and policymakers! Why? Because our discipline has never seen a time of such importance. Supply chain “something” always is in the news. Congress and the EU parliaments often talk about “supply chain problems.” Leader's pontificate about the future of transportation and related technology. Regulators are ready to return from COVID clemency which provided enhanced flexibility and improvisation to supply chains (Richey et al., <span>2022</span>). Government agencies are looking for ways to incentivize companies to reshore or nearshore manufacturing that is regarded as “critical.” As we have watched the public spectacles in real time, we find that most people making laws and implementing policies have something in common regardless of political party affiliation. They are making decisions with extraordinarily little knowledge or experience in logistics and supply chain management (L&SCM). It is time for our research community to address the L&SCM policy gap.</p><p>Over the last 2 years, we ha
在过去的十年里,许多手稿和编辑意见都担心学术研究与管理无关。这种层叠的抱怨与大多数商业学科的研究相关。随着我们的著作在理论上变得越来越深奥,我们的方法与管理者、作者(Hawkins et al., 2022)、院长、政治家以及现在的认证机构(Richey &Davis-Sramek, 2022)越来越多地要求对学术研究投资所提供的价值进行核算。目前对研究影响的高度有缺陷的测量正在调整,以适应我们日益感兴趣的利益相关者的需求。现在,我们的研究比以往任何时候都更有必要对我们神圣的学术殿堂之外产生影响。在《商业物流杂志》(JBL),强大的理论和方法严谨性是入场费,但我们也很高兴发表对行业有影响的文章(Davis-Sramek &克,2022)。不涉及管理的论文总是被拒绝,但在JBL上发表的论文却受到了严肃的关注。我们注意到,越来越多的高管将我们在社交媒体账户上发布的JBL文章摘要视为了解商业实践的重要途径。事实上,JBL的LinkedIn账户在一年多的时间里已经增长到近2000名粉丝。在关注JBL LinkedIn账户的人中,只有大约三分之一是学者(https://www.linkedin.com/company/journal-of-business-logisticss/)。这是一个惊喜,为我们提供了另一条支持JBL作者工作的途径。当然,学术界和商界是JBL最大的两个利益相关者,但还有另一个利益相关者群体——我们的政府官员和政策制定者——已经成熟,可以加强对我们研究的前瞻性和回顾性学习!为什么?因为我们的纪律从未经历过如此重要的时刻。供应链“某些东西”总是出现在新闻中。美国国会和欧盟议会经常谈论“供应链问题”。领导者对未来交通和相关技术的看法。监管机构已准备好从对COVID的宽容中恢复过来,这为供应链提供了更大的灵活性和即兴性(Richey et al., 2022)。政府机构正在寻找方法,鼓励企业将被视为“关键”的制造业迁回国内或近岸。当我们实时观察这些公共奇观时,我们发现,大多数制定法律和执行政策的人都有一些共同点,而不是政党。他们在物流和供应链管理(L&SCM)方面的知识或经验非常少的情况下做出决策。现在是我们的研究团体解决供应链管理政策差距的时候了。在过去的两年里,我们看到我们的许多同事在媒体上谈论供应链的复杂性。我们的社区对限制旅行、运输疫苗、管理哄骗者、寻找新的替代供应来源、处理能源问题、授权电动汽车采用、调整包装中断以及无数其他主题发表了评论。我(格伦)甚至有机会就供应链问题向国会发表讲话。尽管有这些互动,但我们并没有看到提交给JBL的研究增加,这些研究向政府和政策制定者提供了关于供应链的教育和信息。作为研究人员,我们需要提供专家分析,为他们的决策提供信息。事实上,我们的政府领导人继续讨论“供应链”,就好像只有一条供应链一样,这令人不安,因为它低估了管理本地、区域和/或全球网络的巨大复杂性(Wiedmer等人,2021)。将产品和服务从创造转移到消费,然后再转移回来的动态流程的简化,不可能由一个政策沙皇和一个小委员会来管理。JBL的44年研究支持这样一个现实,即管理供应链需要所有实体和流程的参与和协调。毫不奇怪,关于政策机会的讨论为我们打开了一扇门,让我们注意到本期《JBL》上发表的研究的广度。第43卷,第4期包括10篇杰出的文章,这些文章展示了我们的评审团队处理广泛的供应链管理领域的意愿。这些文章还揭示了该杂志对方法的开放性,包括档案计量经济学分析、案例研究、深度访谈、实验室实验、准实验和调查。我们现在将分析这些文章,并将它们与未来的政策相关研究联系起来。在《要素市场中资源稀缺性的认知:对管理注意力和协作的影响》一文中,Wiedmer和Whipple对采购经理进行了调查,以检验全球化要素市场中的资源稀缺性。 鉴于当前的经济波动,采购经理们必须在资源稀缺和围绕稀缺本身的不确定性之间游弋。这一现实影响了管理者如何处理供应链协作。作者指出,当资源被预期为稀缺时,管理者的注意力水平会提高,但在建立联系后,管理者会忽视稀缺问题。继续对不确定性的讨论,Bendoly等人(2022)制作了我们的第二项研究,题为“反向拉动:供应链决策中供需不确定性的联合考虑”。在一个受控的报纸路由实验室实验中,作者考虑了上游和下游的不确定性,使库存管理决策复杂化。结果详细说明了下游的不确定性导致拉向中心偏差,而上游的不确定性导致多样化偏差。结果详细说明了重要的相互作用,表明下游的不确定性可以引发和影响多样化偏差,尽管缺乏供应的不确定性。供应的不确定性影响拉向中心偏置的大小。考虑一下:鉴于全球范围内(政府)正在进行大量的政策调整,围绕稀缺的不确定性会增强还是减少?今天制定的政策会对协作以及对稀缺性和不确定性的看法产生积极或消极的影响吗?内部政策的调整将如何影响与库存管理策略相关的供应和/或需求方面的不确定性?在第三项研究中,Ellram等人(2022)直面当前的政策问题。在《范围3货运排放的合法性理论视角》一书中,作者质疑了可持续发展项目的影响。交通运输是发展中国家增长最快的排放形式,但可持续性在许多组织的整体可持续性议程中并不是优先考虑的事项。结果表明,减少货运排放是在孤立的企业运输职能中进行管理的。这导致组织缺乏对减少外包货运排放的关注。调查结果揭示了西方经济与新兴经济体政策预期之间的脱节,导致了一个需要解决的重大差距。Ellram的深度访谈方法提供了对内部决策的丰富理解,这些决策可能与外部政策和合作伙伴的经济预期不一致。考虑:研究人员将需要考虑跨境政策如何使传统关系复杂化。此外,虽然可持续发展项目有一个重要的长期目标,但在制定这些政策时,如果不包括政府以外的合作伙伴,会在短期和中期产生意想不到的后果吗?接下来,在“金融机构对农产品供应链中交易所的影响:信息经济学视角”中,Darby等人(2022)使用时间序列分析来检查金融机构在执行供应链活动中所扮演的角色……一直到农场。作者研究了金融市场如何作为农产品供应链中交换活动的信息来源和影响。该研究表明,来自金融市场的信息影响农民和客户之间的交易,但其影响不对称,取决于交易动态和当地市场条件。Darby的研究也借鉴了资源基础观点,将供应链管理资源的重要性与市场联系起来。考虑一下:鉴于全球控制通货膨胀的行动越来越多,供应链经理必须监控市场,以帮助预测商品和资源的价值。思考:政府政策的变化将如何影响金融机构和供应链之间的关系?当政策要求农产品支持能源生产(如乙醇)时,会发生什么?是否可以制定政策来平息供应链交换动态并结合当地市场情况?第五和第六项研究考察了供应链契合度和整合,这是许多供应链在大流行后重新审视的两个概念。在“供应链导向对供应链成员之间契合度的影响:三元视角”一文中,Gligor、Feizabadi等人(2022)重新提出了供应链导向(SCO)的概念。SCO被认为是供应链管理的推动者,并以供应链一致性为基础。与个别公司层面的研究不同,本文考察了三位一体。在此过程中,作者引入了SCO供应商契合度和SCO客户契合度的概念。研究结果表明,上合组织在整个供应链上的一致性似乎比上合组织本身的水平更重要。考虑一下:在政策方面,研究人员可能
{"title":"What about policy research?","authors":"Robert Glenn Richey Jr, Beth Davis-Sramek","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12324","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12324","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, many manuscripts and editorial opinions have been written that worry about academic research is not being relevant to management. This cascading complaint is relevant to research across most business disciplines. As our writings become more theoretically esoteric and our methods become more distant from the manager, authors (Hawkins et al., <span>2022</span>), deans, politicians, and now accreditation agencies (Richey & Davis-Sramek, <span>2022</span>) are increasingly asking for an accounting of the value provided by investing in academic research. The current highly flawed measurement of research impact is adjusting to the demands of our increasingly interested stakeholders. Now more than ever, our research must have an impact beyond our hallowed academic halls.</p><p>At the <i>Journal of Business Logistics</i> (<i>JBL</i>), strong theoretical and methodological rigor are the price of admission, but we are also pleased to publish articles that provide implications for industry (Davis-Sramek & Richey, <span>2022</span>). Submissions without managerial implications are consistently desk rejected, but the papers published in JBL are getting serious attention. We note the rapid growth of executives viewing <i>JBL</i> article summaries that we post on our social media accounts as an important avenue to inform business practice. In fact, the <i>JBL</i> LinkedIn account has grown to nearly 2000 followers in just over a year. Only about a third of the individuals following the <i>JBL</i> LinkedIn account are academics (https://www.linkedin.com/company/journal-of-business-logisticss/). This was a pleasant surprise and provides us with another route to support the work of <i>JBL</i> authors.</p><p>Of course, academia and business represent two of the largest <i>JBL</i> stakeholders, but there is another stakeholder group that is ripe for enhanced prospective and retrospective learning about our research – our government officials and policymakers! Why? Because our discipline has never seen a time of such importance. Supply chain “something” always is in the news. Congress and the EU parliaments often talk about “supply chain problems.” Leader's pontificate about the future of transportation and related technology. Regulators are ready to return from COVID clemency which provided enhanced flexibility and improvisation to supply chains (Richey et al., <span>2022</span>). Government agencies are looking for ways to incentivize companies to reshore or nearshore manufacturing that is regarded as “critical.” As we have watched the public spectacles in real time, we find that most people making laws and implementing policies have something in common regardless of political party affiliation. They are making decisions with extraordinarily little knowledge or experience in logistics and supply chain management (L&SCM). It is time for our research community to address the L&SCM policy gap.</p><p>Over the last 2 years, we ha","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"43 4","pages":"416-420"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.12324","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46750833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
While services represent the largest sector of the global economy, 86.8% in the United States, most supply chain management (SCM) research is focused on product flows. Executives in manufacturing firms have benefited from frameworks created to implement SCM processes, but this is not the case for their counterparts in service companies. The two most cited SCM frameworks for services have methodological and conceptual deficiencies. Drawing upon the service-dominant logic of marketing and using an empirical research approach, we developed supply chain structure maps for nine service firms. Our findings indicate that the supply chain structure maps of service companies are comparable to those in the product-based literature, which supports the service-dominant logic. Then, we identified the six key processes that constitute a framework to manage service supply chains. The customer relationship management and the supplier relationship management processes form the critical links in the supply chain, and the other four processes are coordinated through this linkage. The SCM framework for services provides direction for executives in service firms who need to increase cross-functional integration within their firms and with other members of the supply chain. For academics, 12 avenues for future research are identified.
{"title":"A supply chain management framework for services","authors":"Matias G. Enz, Douglas M. Lambert","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12323","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12323","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While services represent the largest sector of the global economy, 86.8% in the United States, most supply chain management (SCM) research is focused on product flows. Executives in manufacturing firms have benefited from frameworks created to implement SCM processes, but this is not the case for their counterparts in service companies. The two most cited SCM frameworks for services have methodological and conceptual deficiencies. Drawing upon the service-dominant logic of marketing and using an empirical research approach, we developed supply chain structure maps for nine service firms. Our findings indicate that the supply chain structure maps of service companies are comparable to those in the product-based literature, which supports the service-dominant logic. Then, we identified the six key processes that constitute a framework to manage service supply chains. The customer relationship management and the supplier relationship management processes form the critical links in the supply chain, and the other four processes are coordinated through this linkage. The SCM framework for services provides direction for executives in service firms who need to increase cross-functional integration within their firms and with other members of the supply chain. For academics, 12 avenues for future research are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"11-36"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44671364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yao “Henry” Jin, Monique L. Ueltschy Murfield, Dora E. Bock
Buy-online-pickup-instore (BOPIS) services have become an increasingly important part of a retailer's omnichannel strategy. When service failures (e.g., stock-out) occur, consumers may resort to negative word-ofmouth (NWOM) to share their evaluation of the retailer's BOPIS service. While a retailer's service recovery policies (e.g., cross-channel substitution) may help to fulfill its service intent, the extent to which these two signals can improve consumer satisfaction and diminish their NWOM intent remains unknown. Drawing from both service recovery literature and signaling theory, we conducted a series of five experiments and find that the intradimensional congruity of the signal set communicated by the retailer during its BOPIS service process depends on both its operational capability and the consumer's own predilection regarding the product category. These insights collectively indicate that while a retailer's operations need to support service policies to provide a congruous BOPIS service process, substitution policies offered to consumers during the transaction need to consider the extent to which a consumer's purchase decision is hedonic or utilitarian. In turn, this finding suggests that a retailer's category management needs to consider BOPIS substitution in terms of both product assortment and inventory policies.
{"title":"Do as You Say, or I Will: Retail signal congruency in buy-online-pickup-in-store and negative word-of-mouth","authors":"Yao “Henry” Jin, Monique L. Ueltschy Murfield, Dora E. Bock","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12322","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12322","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Buy-online-pickup-instore (BOPIS) services have become an increasingly important part of a retailer's omnichannel strategy. When service failures (e.g., stock-out) occur, consumers may resort to negative word-ofmouth (NWOM) to share their evaluation of the retailer's BOPIS service. While a retailer's service recovery policies (e.g., cross-channel substitution) may help to fulfill its service intent, the extent to which these two signals can improve consumer satisfaction and diminish their NWOM intent remains unknown. Drawing from both service recovery literature and signaling theory, we conducted a series of five experiments and find that the intradimensional congruity of the signal set communicated by the retailer during its BOPIS service process depends on both its operational capability and the consumer's own predilection regarding the product category. These insights collectively indicate that while a retailer's operations need to support service policies to provide a congruous BOPIS service process, substitution policies offered to consumers during the transaction need to consider the extent to which a consumer's purchase decision is hedonic or utilitarian. In turn, this finding suggests that a retailer's category management needs to consider BOPIS substitution in terms of both product assortment and inventory policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"37-60"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.12322","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41490922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study examines the impacts of consumer confidence on stockpiling behavior and, subsequently, retail inventory management. We show how stockpiling behavior evolved during the “Great Recession” of 2008–2009 as consumer confidence waned and demonstrate the impact of this development on inventory management. Drawing on the two-segment household inventory theory consisting of nonstockpiling and stockpiling segments, we use a panel dataset (2005–2015) to calibrate household inventory holdings. This dataset then serves as input for a retailer-level case study. Our empirical analysis reveals significant impacts from changing stockpiling behavior. When consumer confidence is low, both stockpiling and nonstockpiling segments respond by reducing weekly consumption rates; however, the stockpiling segment also significantly lengthens the time between shopping trips, and ultimately increases the duration of inventory holdings. These changes to consumption and stockpiling add complexity to inventory planning, requiring retailers to carefully adjust inventory levels to maintain service levels.
{"title":"When the going gets tough, do the tough go shopping?","authors":"Xiaodan Pan, Benny Mantin, Martin Dresner","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12319","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12319","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the impacts of consumer confidence on stockpiling behavior and, subsequently, retail inventory management. We show how stockpiling behavior evolved during the “Great Recession” of 2008–2009 as consumer confidence waned and demonstrate the impact of this development on inventory management. Drawing on the two-segment household inventory theory consisting of nonstockpiling and stockpiling segments, we use a panel dataset (2005–2015) to calibrate household inventory holdings. This dataset then serves as input for a retailer-level case study. Our empirical analysis reveals significant impacts from changing stockpiling behavior. When consumer confidence is low, both stockpiling and nonstockpiling segments respond by reducing weekly consumption rates; however, the stockpiling segment also significantly lengthens the time between shopping trips, and ultimately increases the duration of inventory holdings. These changes to consumption and stockpiling add complexity to inventory planning, requiring retailers to carefully adjust inventory levels to maintain service levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"61-79"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43797207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Molly M. Hughes, Zenan Zhou, Walter Zinn, A. Michael Knemeyer
A plastic response is a type of resilient response to disruption whereby a supply chain is significantly redesigned. This is in contrast to the most common responses to disruption emphasized in the extant resilience literature, in which restoration of a supply chain to its pre-disruption state is typically the focus. Researching plastic responses is important because they differ greatly from restoration. A plastic response is a new way to operate, thus requiring implementation of major changes to the supply chain. Accordingly, a foundational premise is adopted to characterize a plastic response as (1) a significant redesign, (2) due to a pressing need, (3) requiring most or all of the following: acquisition of new skills, investment in new assets and leadership support, (4) a permanent new way to operate. Additionally, eight propositions are offered to serve as bases for further research. These relate to two fundamental issues: when are plastic responses most likely to be exercised and how to enable plastic responses. The propositions were developed through qualitative data analysis and informed by change management theory. The data were collected from in-depth interviews with global corporations in a variety of industries. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications are offered at the end.
{"title":"Plastic response to disruptions: Significant redesign of supply chains","authors":"Molly M. Hughes, Zenan Zhou, Walter Zinn, A. Michael Knemeyer","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12321","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12321","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A plastic response is a type of resilient response to disruption whereby a supply chain is significantly redesigned. This is in contrast to the most common responses to disruption emphasized in the extant resilience literature, in which restoration of a supply chain to its pre-disruption state is typically the focus. Researching plastic responses is important because they differ greatly from restoration. A plastic response is a new way to operate, thus requiring implementation of major changes to the supply chain. Accordingly, a foundational premise is adopted to characterize a plastic response as (1) a significant redesign, (2) due to a pressing need, (3) requiring most or all of the following: acquisition of new skills, investment in new assets and leadership support, (4) a permanent new way to operate. Additionally, eight propositions are offered to serve as bases for further research. These relate to two fundamental issues: when are plastic responses most likely to be exercised and how to enable plastic responses. The propositions were developed through qualitative data analysis and informed by change management theory. The data were collected from in-depth interviews with global corporations in a variety of industries. Theoretical contributions and managerial implications are offered at the end.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"80-108"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46951047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The last-mile problem presents a daunting challenge for many logistics service providers, especially some 7000 small, localized operations for whom the cost of complex software solutions is often prohibitive. As a result, last-mile dispatchers rely on simple heuristics to ensure adequate customer service at an acceptable cost. This research effort extends prior qualitative work by developing and testing a simple vehicle routing heuristic, based on behaviors observed in practice, that prioritizes customer service over cost against other simple vehicle routing heuristics across a variety of environments using simulation. The results support the inclusion of a customer service focus in vehicle routing and the addition of such heuristics to existing algorithm portfolios, specifically in urban areas with well-developed highway systems.
{"title":"Inductive research in last-mile delivery routing: Introducing the Re-Gifting heuristic","authors":"William J. Rose, John E. Bell, Stanley E. Griffis","doi":"10.1111/jbl.12318","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jbl.12318","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The last-mile problem presents a daunting challenge for many logistics service providers, especially some 7000 small, localized operations for whom the cost of complex software solutions is often prohibitive. As a result, last-mile dispatchers rely on simple heuristics to ensure adequate customer service at an acceptable cost. This research effort extends prior qualitative work by developing and testing a simple vehicle routing heuristic, based on behaviors observed in practice, that prioritizes customer service over cost against other simple vehicle routing heuristics across a variety of environments using simulation. The results support the inclusion of a customer service focus in vehicle routing and the addition of such heuristics to existing algorithm portfolios, specifically in urban areas with well-developed highway systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"44 1","pages":"109-140"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jbl.12318","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41409767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}