This article critically examines the ethical dilemmas and intercultural value navigations within the landscape of international student mobility (ISM), focusing on the scholarship-related experiences of international students in China. The study proposes and draws on the synthesized analytical framework: Multidimensional Actor-Value (MAV) Framework, and explores how international students perceive, negotiate, and respond to the ethical issues arising from value conflicts with the norms embedded in Chinese scholarship policies and practices. Based on the data analysis on the semi-structured in-depth interviews with 36 international students from over 20 countries in China, the findings reveal significant disparities in how students from Global South and Global North countries experience conditional scholarship offers, recognise their scholarship advantages over domestic students, and perceive the scholarship policies. The study points out to the complex of ‘education equality paradox’, and argues that, students’ negotiations and perceptions of fairness, legitimacy, and opportunity are shaped or reshaped by structural forces and power dynamics, their sociocultural backgrounds, and the degree of internationalisation in their home countries. This research calls for more culturally responsive, ethically reflexive, and socially sustainable scholarship policies that better align national and institutional objectives with the diverse academic and moral values of international students.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
