首页 > 最新文献

Applied Cognitive Psychology最新文献

英文 中文
Pronoun Anaphora and Children's Developing Abilities to Backward Reference in Criminal Cases of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse 在指控儿童性虐待的刑事案件中,代词拟合与儿童反向参照能力的发展
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4257
Ciara Ruiz-Earle, Colleen E. Sullivan, Stacia N. Stolzenberg

In child sexual abuse (CSA) testimony, attorneys may ask children questions containing pronoun anaphora (e.g., “Where was your Dad?” “What did he do?” he is a pronoun anaphora for referent, Dad). To answer these questions, children must recall the pronoun's referent and appropriate answer to the question. This may be too complex a cognitive task for young children, especially when there are multiple question-and-answer (Q–A) turns between the referent and pronoun, leading to misunderstanding. We examined Q–A pairs containing pronouns in 40 CSA testimonies of 5 to 10-year-olds. Many attorneys' questions (24%) contained pronouns. Attorneys averaged 4.11 Q–A turns between the referent and pronoun. With each additional Q–A turn, the likelihood of misunderstanding increased. Children's age was also associated with a significant decrease in misunderstanding, meaning older children exhibited fewer misunderstandings. To reduce misunderstanding, those questioning children should clarify the referent quickly when their question contains pronoun anaphora.

在儿童性虐待 (CSA) 证词中,律师可能会问儿童含有代词拟声词的问题(例如,"你爸爸在哪里?他做了什么?""他 "是指代词 "爸爸 "的代词拟声词)。要回答这些问题,儿童必须回忆起代词的指代对象和问题的适当答案。对于幼儿来说,这可能是一项过于复杂的认知任务,尤其是当指代和代词之间存在多个问答(Q-A)转折时,更容易导致误解。我们研究了 40 份 5 到 10 岁儿童的 CSA 证言中包含代词的 Q-A 对。许多律师的问题(24%)都包含代词。律师平均在指代人和代词之间转了 4.11 次 Q-A。每增加一次 Q-A 转,误解的可能性就会增加。儿童的年龄也与误解的显著减少有关,这意味着年龄较大的儿童表现出的误解较少。为了减少误解,提问儿童的人应该在他们的问题包含代词拟声词时迅速澄清指代对象。
{"title":"Pronoun Anaphora and Children's Developing Abilities to Backward Reference in Criminal Cases of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse","authors":"Ciara Ruiz-Earle,&nbsp;Colleen E. Sullivan,&nbsp;Stacia N. Stolzenberg","doi":"10.1002/acp.4257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4257","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In child sexual abuse (CSA) testimony, attorneys may ask children questions containing pronoun anaphora (e.g., “Where was your Dad?” “What did he do?” <i>he</i> is a pronoun anaphora for referent, <i>Dad</i>). To answer these questions, children must recall the pronoun's referent and appropriate answer to the question. This may be too complex a cognitive task for young children, especially when there are multiple question-and-answer (Q–A) turns between the referent and pronoun, leading to misunderstanding. We examined Q–A pairs containing pronouns in 40 CSA testimonies of 5 to 10-year-olds. Many attorneys' questions (24%) contained pronouns. Attorneys averaged 4.11 Q–A turns between the referent and pronoun. With each additional Q–A turn, the likelihood of misunderstanding increased. Children's age was also associated with a significant decrease in misunderstanding, meaning older children exhibited fewer misunderstandings. To reduce misunderstanding, those questioning children should clarify the referent quickly when their question contains pronoun anaphora.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142435288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Wisdom of the Crowd Can Unmask Faces 群众的智慧可以揭开面纱
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4254
Daniel J. Carragher, Peter J. B. Hancock

Accurately determining whether two images show the same person is a surprisingly difficult task, which becomes even harder if one or both faces are wearing medical face masks. Attempts to improve unfamiliar face matching accuracy have generally had limited success. Although one brief training program improved masked face matching accuracy by 4.9%, this increase would not overcome the entire performance deficit caused by masks. Here, we investigate whether combining independent identification decisions from different individuals can improve masked face matching performance through the wisdom of the crowd effect. Accuracy gains emerged reliably after combining the decisions of three individuals, culminating in significant improvements of 11%–26% among the largest crowds. Despite creating crowds of up to 80 people, half of the eventual improvement had generally already occurred in crowds of 6 individuals. The wisdom of the crowd effect is a highly effective approach to improving accuracy when identifying masked faces.

准确判断两张图像显示的是否是同一个人是一项令人惊讶的困难任务,如果其中一张或两张人脸都戴着医用面罩,这项任务就变得更加困难。提高陌生人脸匹配准确率的尝试通常收效甚微。虽然一个简短的训练项目能将蒙面人脸匹配准确率提高 4.9%,但这一提高并不能完全克服蒙面人脸造成的成绩缺陷。在这里,我们研究了将来自不同个体的独立识别决定结合起来是否能通过群体智慧效应提高蒙面人脸匹配成绩。在结合三个人的决定后,准确率得到了可靠的提高,在最大的人群中,准确率显著提高了 11%-26%。尽管创建了多达 80 人的人群,但最终提高的一半通常已经出现在 6 人的人群中。人群智慧效应是提高识别蒙面人脸准确率的一种非常有效的方法。
{"title":"The Wisdom of the Crowd Can Unmask Faces","authors":"Daniel J. Carragher,&nbsp;Peter J. B. Hancock","doi":"10.1002/acp.4254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4254","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurately determining whether two images show the same person is a surprisingly difficult task, which becomes even harder if one or both faces are wearing medical face masks. Attempts to improve unfamiliar face matching accuracy have generally had limited success. Although one brief training program improved masked face matching accuracy by 4.9%, this increase would not overcome the entire performance deficit caused by masks. Here, we investigate whether combining independent identification decisions from different individuals can improve masked face matching performance through the wisdom of the crowd effect. Accuracy gains emerged reliably after combining the decisions of three individuals, culminating in significant improvements of 11%–26% among the largest crowds. Despite creating crowds of up to 80 people, half of the eventual improvement had generally already occurred in crowds of 6 individuals. The wisdom of the crowd effect is a highly effective approach to improving accuracy when identifying masked faces.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reframing Confidence Instructions to Child Eyewitness Reduces Overconfidence but Does Not Improve Confidence–Accuracy Calibration 对儿童目击者重新进行信心指导可减少过度自信,但不能提高信心-准确度校准的效果
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4258
Kaila C. Bruer, Shaelyn M. A. Carr, Kayla D. Schick, Matea Gerbeza

Children are well-documented to exhibit poor confidence–accuracy calibration on lineup identification tasks. Children tend to report overconfidence in their (often inaccurate) lineup identification decisions. This research explored the extent to which school-aged children's (N = 142; 6- to 8-year-old) confidence reports are implicitly driven by perceived social pressure to provide a specific confidence rating. Children were randomly assigned to two different confidence instruction conditions: the neutral (n = 69) or the reframed conditions (n = 73). The reframed instructions encouraged honesty and instructed children to ignore perceived pressure when reporting confidence. Results revealed that the reframed instructions resulted in more conservative confidence judgments; however, this shift did not translate into those confidence ratings better reflecting children's identification accuracy. Overall, these findings provide evidence that, while external or social factors play a contributing role, other aspects of development are likely contributing more to the poor confidence–accuracy calibration observed with child eyewitnesses.

儿童在列队辨认任务中表现出的自信-准确度校准能力差是有据可查的。儿童往往对他们的列队识别决定(通常不准确)过度自信。本研究探讨了学龄儿童(人数= 142;6-8 岁)的自信报告在多大程度上是受提供特定自信评级的社会压力的影响。儿童被随机分配到两种不同的信心指导条件下:中性条件(n = 69)或重构条件(n = 73)。重构指导鼓励诚实,并指导儿童在报告信心时忽略感知到的压力。结果显示,重构后的指导使自信判断更加保守;但是,这种转变并没有使自信评级更好地反映儿童的识别准确性。总之,这些研究结果证明,虽然外部或社会因素起到了一定的作用,但其他方面的发展很可能是导致儿童目击者信心-准确性校准不佳的主要原因。
{"title":"Reframing Confidence Instructions to Child Eyewitness Reduces Overconfidence but Does Not Improve Confidence–Accuracy Calibration","authors":"Kaila C. Bruer,&nbsp;Shaelyn M. A. Carr,&nbsp;Kayla D. Schick,&nbsp;Matea Gerbeza","doi":"10.1002/acp.4258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4258","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children are well-documented to exhibit poor confidence–accuracy calibration on lineup identification tasks. Children tend to report overconfidence in their (often inaccurate) lineup identification decisions. This research explored the extent to which school-aged children's (<i>N</i> = 142; 6- to 8-year-old) confidence reports are implicitly driven by perceived social pressure to provide a specific confidence rating. Children were randomly assigned to two different confidence instruction conditions: the neutral (<i>n</i> = 69) or the reframed conditions (<i>n</i> = 73). The reframed instructions encouraged honesty and instructed children to ignore perceived pressure when reporting confidence. Results revealed that the reframed instructions resulted in more conservative confidence judgments; however, this shift did not translate into those confidence ratings better reflecting children's identification accuracy. Overall, these findings provide evidence that, while external or social factors play a contributing role, other aspects of development are likely contributing more to the poor confidence–accuracy calibration observed with child eyewitnesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4258","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Political Variables Predicted the Fading Affect Bias More Strongly for Political Than Nonpolitical Events in the 2020 Presidential Election 政治变量对 2020 年总统大选中政治事件比非政治性事件的消退效应偏差预测更强
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4253
Jeffrey A. Gibbons, Aimee Buchanan, Krystal Langhorne, Sevrin Vandevender

Winning and losing voters tend to experience positive and negative emotions toward elections, respectively. The emotions of autobiographical event memories fade over time with unpleasant emotions fading faster than pleasant emotions; this phenomenon is referred to as the fading affect bias (FAB). Although the FAB differs across several event types (e.g., social media and nonsocial media), the FAB and its relations to political, healthy (e.g., grit), and unhealthy variables (e.g., depression) did not differ significantly across political and nonpolitical events in the context of the 2016 US presidential election. To further explore these relations across political and nonpolitical events, the current study used two online samples (college students and MTurk) in the 2020 US presidential election context. The FAB was expected and found to be robust, it was positively predicted by rehearsal ratings, and its relations to political variables were stronger for political events than nonpolitical events.

获胜和失败的选民往往会对选举分别产生积极和消极的情绪。自传体事件记忆中的情绪会随着时间的推移而消退,令人不快的情绪比令人愉快的情绪消退得更快;这种现象被称为情绪消退偏差(FAB)。尽管FAB在几种事件类型(如社交媒体和非社交媒体)中有所不同,但在2016年美国总统大选的背景下,FAB及其与政治、健康(如勇气)和不健康变量(如抑郁)的关系在政治和非政治事件中并无显著差异。为了进一步探讨这些跨政治和非政治事件的关系,本研究使用了 2020 年美国总统大选背景下的两个在线样本(大学生和 MTurk)。研究发现,FAB 具有预期的稳健性,排练评分对其有正向预测作用,而且在政治事件中,FAB 与政治变量的关系要强于非政治事件。
{"title":"Political Variables Predicted the Fading Affect Bias More Strongly for Political Than Nonpolitical Events in the 2020 Presidential Election","authors":"Jeffrey A. Gibbons,&nbsp;Aimee Buchanan,&nbsp;Krystal Langhorne,&nbsp;Sevrin Vandevender","doi":"10.1002/acp.4253","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4253","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Winning and losing voters tend to experience positive and negative emotions toward elections, respectively. The emotions of autobiographical event memories fade over time with unpleasant emotions fading faster than pleasant emotions; this phenomenon is referred to as the fading affect bias (FAB). Although the FAB differs across several event types (e.g., social media and nonsocial media), the FAB and its relations to political, healthy (e.g., grit), and unhealthy variables (e.g., depression) did not differ significantly across political and nonpolitical events in the context of the 2016 US presidential election. To further explore these relations across political and nonpolitical events, the current study used two online samples (college students and MTurk) in the 2020 US presidential election context. The FAB was expected and found to be robust, it was positively predicted by rehearsal ratings, and its relations to political variables were stronger for political events than nonpolitical events.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4253","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the Effect of Drawing Medium on Learning 调查绘画媒介对学习的影响
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4249
Heping Xie, Xiujuan Yang, Chongyi Yang, Shiqi Li, Youzhi Song, Zongkui Zhou

This study aimed to scrutinize the impact of drawing medium on learning. Results from three experiments demonstrated that, when acquiring actual concepts, participants in the finger drawing condition exhibited better definition retention compared to those in the pencil drawing and stylus drawing conditions. When engaging with fictitious concepts, the superiority of the finger drawing condition in definition retention persisted over the other conditions. However, the advantage of finger drawing in definition retention was attenuated due to lower prior knowledge for fictitious materials. Experiment 1 found that term source memory and learning motivation were higher for finger drawing compared to pencil drawing, but these findings were not replicated in Experiments 2 and 3. Furthermore, Experiment 3 revealed that stylus drawing resulted in superior term source memory and learning motivation compared to finger drawing. This study underscores the presence of a drawing medium effect and suggests the significance of prior knowledge.

本研究旨在探讨绘画媒介对学习的影响。三个实验的结果表明,在学习实际概念时,与铅笔绘画和触笔绘画条件下的参与者相比,手指绘画条件下的参与者表现出更好的定义保持能力。在学习虚构概念时,手指绘画条件在定义保持方面的优势依然高于其他条件。然而,由于虚构材料的先验知识较少,手指画在定义保持方面的优势被削弱了。实验 1 发现,与铅笔画相比,手指画的词源记忆和学习动机更高,但这些发现在实验 2 和 3 中没有得到重复。此外,实验 3 显示,与手指绘画相比,触控笔绘画的词源记忆和学习动机更强。这项研究强调了绘画媒介效应的存在,并表明了先验知识的重要性。
{"title":"Investigating the Effect of Drawing Medium on Learning","authors":"Heping Xie,&nbsp;Xiujuan Yang,&nbsp;Chongyi Yang,&nbsp;Shiqi Li,&nbsp;Youzhi Song,&nbsp;Zongkui Zhou","doi":"10.1002/acp.4249","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4249","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to scrutinize the impact of drawing medium on learning. Results from three experiments demonstrated that, when acquiring actual concepts, participants in the finger drawing condition exhibited better definition retention compared to those in the pencil drawing and stylus drawing conditions. When engaging with fictitious concepts, the superiority of the finger drawing condition in definition retention persisted over the other conditions. However, the advantage of finger drawing in definition retention was attenuated due to lower prior knowledge for fictitious materials. Experiment 1 found that term source memory and learning motivation were higher for finger drawing compared to pencil drawing, but these findings were not replicated in Experiments 2 and 3. Furthermore, Experiment 3 revealed that stylus drawing resulted in superior term source memory and learning motivation compared to finger drawing. This study underscores the presence of a drawing medium effect and suggests the significance of prior knowledge.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142404337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Cross-Age Contact Reduce the Cross-Age Deficit in Younger and Older Adult's Eyewitness Identification Performance? 跨年龄接触是否会减少年轻人和老年人目击证人识别能力的跨年龄缺陷?
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4250
Joyce E. Humphries, Catriona Havard, Emily Breese

Age-related differences in identification performance between younger (18–35 years) and older adults (62–68 years), alongside the cross-age effect (CAE), where people recognise own-age faces better than other-age faces, were investigated. Self-reported levels of other-age contact and attitudes, participants' memory for the unbiased lineup instructions, and the confidence-accuracy (C-A) relationship were also examined. Participants (N = 154) viewed two filmed events: one with a young adult target and one with an older adult target. Older adults were less likely than younger adults to identify the perpetrator. Interestingly, the CAE, contact, attitudes, and choosing behaviours did not impact identification performance. Older adults experienced more difficulty remembering the pre-lineup instructions than younger adults, but only after the first lineup. Confidence was predictive of accuracy for both age groups, but this relationship was differently influenced by the CAE. The findings provide further insights into the factors that may impact younger and older adults' identification performance.

研究调查了年轻人(18-35 岁)和老年人(62-68 岁)在识别能力上与年龄有关的差异,以及跨年龄效应(CAE),即识别同龄人比识别异龄人更好。此外,还考察了自我报告的与其他年龄段的接触程度和态度、参与者对无偏差排列指令的记忆以及信心-准确度(C-A)关系。受试者(N = 154)观看了两个录像事件:一个是年轻成人目标,另一个是老年成人目标。老年人比年轻人更不可能识别出犯罪者。有趣的是,CAE、接触、态度和选择行为并不影响识别成绩。老年人比年轻人更难记住列队前的指示,但只有在第一次列队后才会出现这种情况。信心对两个年龄组的准确性都有预测作用,但这种关系受 CAE 的影响不同。这些发现为我们进一步了解可能影响年轻人和老年人识别成绩的因素提供了思路。
{"title":"Does Cross-Age Contact Reduce the Cross-Age Deficit in Younger and Older Adult's Eyewitness Identification Performance?","authors":"Joyce E. Humphries,&nbsp;Catriona Havard,&nbsp;Emily Breese","doi":"10.1002/acp.4250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4250","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Age-related differences in identification performance between younger (18–35 years) and older adults (62–68 years), alongside the cross-age effect (CAE), where people recognise own-age faces better than other-age faces, were investigated. Self-reported levels of other-age contact and attitudes, participants' memory for the unbiased lineup instructions, and the confidence-accuracy (C-A) relationship were also examined. Participants (<i>N</i> = 154) viewed two filmed events: one with a young adult target and one with an older adult target. Older adults were less likely than younger adults to identify the perpetrator. Interestingly, the CAE, contact, attitudes, and choosing behaviours did not impact identification performance. Older adults experienced more difficulty remembering the pre-lineup instructions than younger adults, but only after the first lineup. Confidence was predictive of accuracy for both age groups, but this relationship was differently influenced by the CAE. The findings provide further insights into the factors that may impact younger and older adults' identification performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4250","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142328528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Use of Mnemonics to Minimize the Interfering Effects of Teaching New Words in Semantic Sets to Learners of English as a Foreign Language 使用记忆法尽量减少语义组中新词对英语作为外语的学习者的干扰效应
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4251
Mustafa Sarıoğlu, Çiğdem Karatepe

Most studies in the literature propose that new words should be presented in unrelated sets due to interfering effect of learning vocabulary in semantic sets. Semantically-related words are suggested to be taught in different sessions to avoid this negative effect. However, that is implausible for most second language (L2) teachers owing to the restrictions from curricula or coursebooks, most of which serve new words in semantic fields. The literature does not shed light on how to tackle that problem. Accordingly, this study involves three sets of classroom research conducted with 58 young EFL learners to investigate the effects of mnemonics on minimizing the interference of semantic clustering of new vocabulary. Within 15-week course, one intact class was taught target words through mnemonics while the control group received similar instruction with sentence-context method. The study results demonstrated that mnemonically-instructed L2 learners outperformed on both immediate and delayed recognition of target words.

文献中的大多数研究都提出,由于在语义集中学习词汇会产生干扰效应,新词应该在不相关的集中呈现。为了避免这种负面影响,有人建议将语义相关的单词放在不同的课时中教授。然而,由于课程或教材的限制,大多数第二语言(L2)教师都无法做到这一点。如何解决这个问题,文献中并没有明确的说明。因此,本研究对 58 名年轻的 EFL 学习者进行了三组课堂研究,以探讨记忆法对减少新词汇语义聚类干扰的效果。在为期 15 周的课程中,一个完整的班级通过记忆法教授目标单词,而对照组则通过句子-语境法进行类似的教学。研究结果表明,通过记忆法教学的 L2 学习者在即时和延迟识别目标单词方面均表现出色。
{"title":"The Use of Mnemonics to Minimize the Interfering Effects of Teaching New Words in Semantic Sets to Learners of English as a Foreign Language","authors":"Mustafa Sarıoğlu,&nbsp;Çiğdem Karatepe","doi":"10.1002/acp.4251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4251","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most studies in the literature propose that new words should be presented in unrelated sets due to interfering effect of learning vocabulary in semantic sets. Semantically-related words are suggested to be taught in different sessions to avoid this negative effect. However, that is implausible for most second language (L2) teachers owing to the restrictions from curricula or coursebooks, most of which serve new words in semantic fields. The literature does not shed light on how to tackle that problem. Accordingly, this study involves three sets of classroom research conducted with 58 young EFL learners to investigate the effects of mnemonics on minimizing the interference of semantic clustering of new vocabulary. Within 15-week course, one intact class was taught target words through mnemonics while the control group received similar instruction with sentence-context method. The study results demonstrated that mnemonically-instructed L2 learners outperformed on both immediate and delayed recognition of target words.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4251","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142313388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Toward Sustainable Lifelong Learning: Feedforward Effects of Challenge Recollections on Adult Learning Identity 实现可持续的终身学习:挑战回忆对成人学习认同的前馈效应
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4248
Ziyu Qi, Sibley F. Lyndgaard, Julia E. Melkers, Ruth Kanfer

Little research has examined how prior learning experiences influence adult learning attitudes and lifelong learning engagement. We adopted a person-centric approach to examine past work-related learning experiences and assessed the effects of recalled challenges on current learning attitudes, intentions, and behavior in the same domain. Surveying alumni from an online master's degree program, we found that recollected challenges from past learning entail multifaceted challenge foci (e.g., curriculum-related vs. social obstacles). Learners reporting more challenges in curriculum and social dimensions reported less positive attitudes toward lifelong learning, supporting the notion that negative learning experiences may hinder the development of self-identity as a lifelong learner. Limited support was obtained for predictions about relationships between past challenges and post-graduation learning intentions and behavior. The person-centric approach also permits the analysis of past learning experiences that are not well captured by standard assessments of “successful” adult learning.

很少有研究探讨以往的学习经历如何影响成人的学习态度和终身学习参与度。我们采用了一种以人为本的方法来研究过去与工作相关的学习经历,并评估了回忆起的挑战对当前在同一领域的学习态度、意向和行为的影响。通过对一个在线硕士学位项目的校友进行调查,我们发现,回忆过去学习中遇到的挑战会带来多方面的挑战焦点(如课程相关障碍和社会障碍)。报告在课程和社会方面面临更多挑战的学习者对终身学习的态度并不积极,这支持了消极的学习经历可能会阻碍作为终身学习者的自我认同发展的观点。对于过去的挑战与毕业后的学习意向和行为之间关系的预测,得到的支持有限。以人为本的方法还允许对过去的学习经历进行分析,而 "成功 "成人学习的标准评估并不能很好地反映这些经历。
{"title":"Toward Sustainable Lifelong Learning: Feedforward Effects of Challenge Recollections on Adult Learning Identity","authors":"Ziyu Qi,&nbsp;Sibley F. Lyndgaard,&nbsp;Julia E. Melkers,&nbsp;Ruth Kanfer","doi":"10.1002/acp.4248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4248","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little research has examined how prior learning experiences influence adult learning attitudes and lifelong learning engagement. We adopted a person-centric approach to examine past work-related learning experiences and assessed the effects of recalled challenges on current learning attitudes, intentions, and behavior in the same domain. Surveying alumni from an online master's degree program, we found that recollected challenges from past learning entail multifaceted challenge foci (e.g., curriculum-related vs. social obstacles). Learners reporting more challenges in curriculum and social dimensions reported less positive attitudes toward lifelong learning, supporting the notion that negative learning experiences may hinder the development of self-identity as a lifelong learner. Limited support was obtained for predictions about relationships between past challenges and post-graduation learning intentions and behavior. The person-centric approach also permits the analysis of past learning experiences that are not well captured by standard assessments of “successful” adult learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4248","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142313390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Cross-Cultural and Intra-Cultural Investigation of the Misinformation Effect in Eyewitness Memory Reports 目击者记忆报告中的误报效应的跨文化和文化内调查
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4243
Nkansah Anakwah, Robert Horselenberg, Lorraine Hope, Margaret Amankwah-Poku, Peter J. van Koppen

The culture in which individuals are socialised can play a role in shaping their eyewitness memory reports. Drawing on self-construal theory, we examined cultural differences in the misinformation effect. In a mock witness paradigm, participants sampled from collectivistic (Ghana; n = 65) and individualistic (United Kingdom; n = 62) cultures were exposed to misleading post-event information (PEI). Participants provided a free-recall account and then completed a recognition task that included misinformation items. Cultural differences in misinformation endorsement were not observed in free recall. However, participants from the collectivistic culture endorsed more misleading items in the recognition task than those from the individualistic culture. We also found that in the respective cultures, individual-level cultural orientation was related to the misinformation effect. These findings provide preliminary insights into the role of culture in susceptibility to misleading PEI and further highlight the importance of eliminating leading or suggestive questioning from investigative interviewing practices.

个人所处的社会文化会对其目击者记忆报告产生影响。根据自我建构理论,我们研究了错误信息效应的文化差异。在模拟证人范例中,来自集体主义文化(加纳;n = 65)和个人主义文化(英国;n = 62)的参与者被暴露于误导性的事后信息(PEI)中。受试者提供了一个自由回忆账户,然后完成了一项包含误导信息项目的识别任务。在自由回忆中没有观察到错误信息认可方面的文化差异。然而,在识别任务中,来自集体主义文化的参与者比来自个人主义文化的参与者认可了更多的误导项目。我们还发现,在各自的文化中,个人层面的文化取向与误导效应有关。这些发现初步揭示了文化在易受误导性 PEI 影响方面的作用,并进一步强调了在调查访问实践中消除引导性或暗示性提问的重要性。
{"title":"A Cross-Cultural and Intra-Cultural Investigation of the Misinformation Effect in Eyewitness Memory Reports","authors":"Nkansah Anakwah,&nbsp;Robert Horselenberg,&nbsp;Lorraine Hope,&nbsp;Margaret Amankwah-Poku,&nbsp;Peter J. van Koppen","doi":"10.1002/acp.4243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4243","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The culture in which individuals are socialised can play a role in shaping their eyewitness memory reports. Drawing on self-construal theory, we examined cultural differences in the misinformation effect. In a mock witness paradigm, participants sampled from collectivistic (Ghana; <i>n</i> = 65) and individualistic (United Kingdom; <i>n</i> = 62) cultures were exposed to misleading post-event information (PEI). Participants provided a free-recall account and then completed a recognition task that included misinformation items. Cultural differences in misinformation endorsement were not observed in free recall. However, participants from the collectivistic culture endorsed more misleading items in the recognition task than those from the individualistic culture. We also found that in the respective cultures, individual-level cultural orientation was related to the misinformation effect. These findings provide preliminary insights into the role of culture in susceptibility to misleading PEI and further highlight the importance of eliminating leading or suggestive questioning from investigative interviewing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4243","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142245018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How to Help Students Make Informed Assessments of Cognitive Load: Examining the Role of Training Interventions 如何帮助学生对认知负荷进行知情评估?研究培训干预措施的作用
IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI: 10.1002/acp.4247
Felix Krieglstein, Manuel Schmitz, Lukas Wesenberg, Günter Daniel Rey

Measuring cognitive load and its different types is a significant challenge that is closely related to the development of cognitive load theory (CLT). Previous research has shown that students have difficulty assessing cognitive load after learning or problem-solving. Accordingly, they may not reliably differentiate between the different types of cognitive load. Moreover, students may not consider the entire problem-solving process in their overall cognitive load assessment. The purpose of this work was to examine two training interventions designed to assist students in making informed cognitive load assessments. Study 1 (N = 99) included pre-training with a theoretical introduction to CLT to improve differentiation between cognitive load types. Study 2 (N = 80) implemented post-training by instructing students to consider all impressions during problem-solving for the overall load assessment. As both interventions were unsuccessful, further research is needed to assist students in assessing cognitive load in an informed manner.

认知负荷及其不同类型的测量是一项重大挑战,与认知负荷理论(CLT)的发展密切相关。以往的研究表明,学生在学习或解决问题后很难评估认知负荷。因此,他们可能无法可靠地区分不同类型的认知负荷。此外,学生在进行整体认知负荷评估时可能不会考虑整个问题解决过程。本研究的目的是考察两种旨在帮助学生做出明智认知负荷评估的培训干预措施。研究 1(N = 99)包括对认知负荷理论介绍的预培训,以改进认知负荷类型之间的区分。研究 2(N = 80)通过指导学生在解决问题的过程中考虑所有印象来进行整体负荷评估,从而实施后期培训。由于这两项干预措施都不成功,因此需要进一步研究如何帮助学生以知情的方式评估认知负荷。
{"title":"How to Help Students Make Informed Assessments of Cognitive Load: Examining the Role of Training Interventions","authors":"Felix Krieglstein,&nbsp;Manuel Schmitz,&nbsp;Lukas Wesenberg,&nbsp;Günter Daniel Rey","doi":"10.1002/acp.4247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4247","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measuring cognitive load and its different types is a significant challenge that is closely related to the development of cognitive load theory (CLT). Previous research has shown that students have difficulty assessing cognitive load after learning or problem-solving. Accordingly, they may not reliably differentiate between the different types of cognitive load. Moreover, students may not consider the entire problem-solving process in their overall cognitive load assessment. The purpose of this work was to examine two training interventions designed to assist students in making informed cognitive load assessments. Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 99) included pre-training with a theoretical introduction to CLT to improve differentiation between cognitive load types. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 80) implemented post-training by instructing students to consider all impressions during problem-solving for the overall load assessment. As both interventions were unsuccessful, further research is needed to assist students in assessing cognitive load in an informed manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acp.4247","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142244734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Applied Cognitive Psychology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1