{"title":"When Does the Honeymoon End? Electoral Cycles of Satisfaction With Democracy in Africa","authors":"Masaaki Higashijima, Nicholas Kerr","doi":"10.1111/pops.12878","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12878","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48915938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Lee, Allison Harell, Laura B. Stephenson, Daniel Rubenson, P. Loewen
{"title":"Motivated to Forgive? Partisan Scandals and Party Supporters","authors":"A. Lee, Allison Harell, Laura B. Stephenson, Daniel Rubenson, P. Loewen","doi":"10.1111/pops.12882","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12882","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45304491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
M. Olsson, Sanne van Grootel, Katharina Block, C. Schuster, Loes Meeussen, C. van Laar, T. Schmader, A. Croft, M. Sun, M. Ainsaar, Lianne Aarntzen, M. Adamus, Joel R. Anderson, Ciara Atkinson, M. Avicenna, P. Bąbel, Markus Barth, Tessa M. Benson-Greenwald, Edona Maloku, Jacques Berent, Hilary B. Bergsieker, M. Biernat, A. G. Bîrneanu, Blerta Bodinaku, J. Bosak, J. Bosson, M. Branković, J. Burkauskas, V. Čavojová, S. Cheryan, Eunsoo Choi, I. Choi, Carlos C Contreras-Ibáñez, A. Coogan, I. Danyliuk, I. Dar-Nimrod, N. Dasgupta, S. de Lemus, T. Devos, Marwan Diab, A. Diekman, M. Efremova, L. Eisner, Anja Eller, R. Erentaitė, D. Fedáková, Renata Franc, L. Gartzia, A. Gavreliuc, Dana Gavreliuc, J. Gecaite-Stonciene, Adriana L. Germano, I. Giovannelli, Renzo Gismondi Diaz, Lyudmila Gitikhmayeva, Abiy Menkir Gizaw, B. Gjoneska, Omar Martínez González, Roberto González, Isaac David Grijalva, Derya Güngör, M. G. Sendén, William Hall, Charles Harb, Bushra Hassan, T. Hässler, Diala R. Hawi, Levke Henningsen, Annedore
The present
现在
{"title":"Gender Gap in Parental Leave Intentions: Evidence from 37 Countries","authors":"M. Olsson, Sanne van Grootel, Katharina Block, C. Schuster, Loes Meeussen, C. van Laar, T. Schmader, A. Croft, M. Sun, M. Ainsaar, Lianne Aarntzen, M. Adamus, Joel R. Anderson, Ciara Atkinson, M. Avicenna, P. Bąbel, Markus Barth, Tessa M. Benson-Greenwald, Edona Maloku, Jacques Berent, Hilary B. Bergsieker, M. Biernat, A. G. Bîrneanu, Blerta Bodinaku, J. Bosak, J. Bosson, M. Branković, J. Burkauskas, V. Čavojová, S. Cheryan, Eunsoo Choi, I. Choi, Carlos C Contreras-Ibáñez, A. Coogan, I. Danyliuk, I. Dar-Nimrod, N. Dasgupta, S. de Lemus, T. Devos, Marwan Diab, A. Diekman, M. Efremova, L. Eisner, Anja Eller, R. Erentaitė, D. Fedáková, Renata Franc, L. Gartzia, A. Gavreliuc, Dana Gavreliuc, J. Gecaite-Stonciene, Adriana L. Germano, I. Giovannelli, Renzo Gismondi Diaz, Lyudmila Gitikhmayeva, Abiy Menkir Gizaw, B. Gjoneska, Omar Martínez González, Roberto González, Isaac David Grijalva, Derya Güngör, M. G. Sendén, William Hall, Charles Harb, Bushra Hassan, T. Hässler, Diala R. Hawi, Levke Henningsen, Annedore ","doi":"10.1111/pops.12880","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12880","url":null,"abstract":"The present","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49475935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do Populist Leaders Mimic the Language of Ordinary Citizens? Evidence From India","authors":"Jean‐Thomas Martelli, C. Jaffrelot","doi":"10.1111/pops.12881","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12881","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46084484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Political Reputation of Students in Upper Secondary School: Consequences for Their Collective Political Activities Four Years Later","authors":"H. Stattin, S. Russo","doi":"10.1111/pops.12879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12879","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42774670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reducing Political Dehumanization by Pairing Facts With Personal Experiences","authors":"Emily Kubin, Kurt Gray, Christian von Sikorski","doi":"10.1111/pops.12875","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12875","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46755390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article explores constructions of consensus and unity and their potential implications on partisan politics and democratic decision making in parliamentary discourse on the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. The analytic corpus consists of transcripts of three debates on COVID-19 management in the Greek parliament, conducted in the period from April 2020 to October 2021. Analysis using tools and concepts of rhetorical and discursive psychology indicated that consensus was constructed as agreement on hard data, as compliance with health experts, and as national unity, and it was counterposed to partisan politics. Nevertheless, at the same time, appeals to consensus constituted a resource mobilized in the service of partisan politics, as both government and opposition parties appealed to the need of agreement in order to warrant their position and to ward off the position of opponents. The rhetoric of consensus, however, included the seeds of disagreement, since while its necessity was collaboratively accomplished, its parameters and boundaries were challenged. The implications of these findings for democratic governance and political decision making are pinpointed.
{"title":"Appeals to Consensus and Partisan Politics in Parliamentary Discourse on the Pandemic","authors":"Lia Figgou, Eleni Andreouli","doi":"10.1111/pops.12874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12874","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores constructions of consensus and unity and their potential implications on partisan politics and democratic decision making in parliamentary discourse on the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. The analytic corpus consists of transcripts of three debates on COVID-19 management in the Greek parliament, conducted in the period from April 2020 to October 2021. Analysis using tools and concepts of rhetorical and discursive psychology indicated that consensus was constructed as agreement on hard data, as compliance with health experts, and as national unity, and it was counterposed to partisan politics. Nevertheless, at the same time, appeals to consensus constituted a resource mobilized in the service of partisan politics, as both government and opposition parties appealed to the need of agreement in order to warrant their position and to ward off the position of opponents. The rhetoric of consensus, however, included the seeds of disagreement, since while its necessity was collaboratively accomplished, its parameters and boundaries were challenged. The implications of these findings for democratic governance and political decision making are pinpointed.","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44236644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna Kende, Hadi Sam Nariman, Boglárka Nyúl, Constantina Badea, B. Lášticová, Yara Mahfud, Andreea Gruev-Vintila, A. Minescu, Ashley O’Connor, M. Boza, Xenia Daniela Poslon, M. Popper, Márton Hadarics
{"title":"“Put a Little Love in Your Heart”: Acceptance of Paternalistic and Ally Political Discourses Both Predict\u0000 Pro‐Roma\u0000 Solidarity Intentions Through Moral Inclusion","authors":"Anna Kende, Hadi Sam Nariman, Boglárka Nyúl, Constantina Badea, B. Lášticová, Yara Mahfud, Andreea Gruev-Vintila, A. Minescu, Ashley O’Connor, M. Boza, Xenia Daniela Poslon, M. Popper, Márton Hadarics","doi":"10.1111/pops.12877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12877","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"63622790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Electing to Take Control: Political Identification and Personal Control","authors":"Katharine H. Greenaway","doi":"10.1111/pops.12873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12873","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43587811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jennifer Merrolla, Zoe Nemerever, Mackenzie Lockhart, Thad Kousser, Mindy Romero, Seth Hill
How does the public react to information about the likely progression of COVID-19 cases in the United States? How do these reactions vary over the course of the pandemic and by partisanship, and with what consequences for policy attitudes and personal behavior? We argue that reading projections about the peak of COVID-19 cases in the United States is likely to lead to increased levels of anxiety and sadness. We expect that these effects will be more pronounced and less polarized along partisan lines earlier in the pandemic. Finally, we expect that elevated anxiety and sadness should in turn lead to greater support for protective policies to combat the pandemic and a greater inclination to engage in protective behaviors. To test these arguments, we fielded online survey experiments at three points in time (April, June, and August 2020), in which respondents were randomly assigned to a control group or one of two projections about the likely progression of COVID-19 cases in the United States. Across all three waves, we find that exposure to information about case peaks increases anxiety and sadness, though the effects get weaker over time, particularly among Republicans. We also find evidence that these elevated emotional responses increase support for protective policies and behavior.
{"title":"Emotional Reactions to COVID-19 Projections and Consequences for Protective Policies and Personal Behavior.","authors":"Jennifer Merrolla, Zoe Nemerever, Mackenzie Lockhart, Thad Kousser, Mindy Romero, Seth Hill","doi":"10.1111/pops.12876","DOIUrl":"10.1111/pops.12876","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How does the public react to information about the likely progression of COVID-19 cases in the United States? How do these reactions vary over the course of the pandemic and by partisanship, and with what consequences for policy attitudes and personal behavior? We argue that reading projections about the peak of COVID-19 cases in the United States is likely to lead to increased levels of anxiety and sadness. We expect that these effects will be more pronounced and less polarized along partisan lines earlier in the pandemic. Finally, we expect that elevated anxiety and sadness should in turn lead to greater support for protective policies to combat the pandemic and a greater inclination to engage in protective behaviors. To test these arguments, we fielded online survey experiments at three points in time (April, June, and August 2020), in which respondents were randomly assigned to a control group or one of two projections about the likely progression of COVID-19 cases in the United States. Across all three waves, we find that exposure to information about case peaks increases anxiety and sadness, though the effects get weaker over time, particularly among Republicans. We also find evidence that these elevated emotional responses increase support for protective policies and behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":48332,"journal":{"name":"Political Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9880625/pdf/POPS-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9170106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：