Journal Article Review of “Unsustainable: Amazon, Warehousing, and the Politics of Exploitation” Get access Review of “Unsustainable: Amazon, Warehousing, and the Politics of Exploitation” By Juliann Emmons Allison and Ellen Reese University of California Press, 2023. 356 pages. Prices (cloth and paper): $29.95 & $85.00. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520388383/unsustainable Steven P Vallas Steven P Vallas Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad136, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad136 Published: 19 October 2023 Article history Received: 13 September 2023 Accepted: 14 September 2023 Published: 19 October 2023
《不可持续:亚马逊、仓储和剥削政治》的期刊文章评论，参见《不可持续:亚马逊、仓储和剥削政治》的评论，作者:Juliann Emmons Allison和Ellen Reese，加州大学出版社，2023年。356页。价格(布和纸):$29.95 & $85.00。https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520388383/unsustainable Steven P Vallas Steven P Vallas搜索作者的其他作品:牛津学术谷歌学者社会力量，soad136, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad136发布:2023年10月19日文章历史接收:2023年9月13日接收:2023年9月14日发布:2023年10月19日
{"title":"Review of “Unsustainable: Amazon, Warehousing, and the Politics of Exploitation”","authors":"Steven P Vallas","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad136","url":null,"abstract":"Journal Article Review of “Unsustainable: Amazon, Warehousing, and the Politics of Exploitation” Get access Review of “Unsustainable: Amazon, Warehousing, and the Politics of Exploitation” By Juliann Emmons Allison and Ellen Reese University of California Press, 2023. 356 pages. Prices (cloth and paper): $29.95 & $85.00. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520388383/unsustainable Steven P Vallas Steven P Vallas Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad136, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad136 Published: 19 October 2023 Article history Received: 13 September 2023 Accepted: 14 September 2023 Published: 19 October 2023","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135779517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal Article Review of “The Struggle for the People’s King: How Politics Transforms the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement” Get access Review of “The Struggle for the People’s King: How Politics Transforms the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement” By Hajar Yazdiha Princeton University Press, 2023. 286 pages. Prices (cloth and paper): $95.00 (hardcover); $29.95 (paperback). https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691246475/the-struggle-for-the-peoples-king Rory McVeigh Rory McVeigh Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad135, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad135 Published: 19 October 2023 Article history Received: 08 September 2023 Accepted: 14 September 2023 Published: 19 October 2023
{"title":"Review of “The Struggle for the People’s King: How Politics Transforms the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement”","authors":"Rory McVeigh","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad135","url":null,"abstract":"Journal Article Review of “The Struggle for the People’s King: How Politics Transforms the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement” Get access Review of “The Struggle for the People’s King: How Politics Transforms the Memory of the Civil Rights Movement” By Hajar Yazdiha Princeton University Press, 2023. 286 pages. Prices (cloth and paper): $95.00 (hardcover); $29.95 (paperback). https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691246475/the-struggle-for-the-peoples-king Rory McVeigh Rory McVeigh Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad135, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad135 Published: 19 October 2023 Article history Received: 08 September 2023 Accepted: 14 September 2023 Published: 19 October 2023","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135779542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article introduces fiscal impoverishment as a framework for comparative poverty research. We invert standard analyses of welfare state policy and household poverty by focusing not on poverty alleviation but poverty creation and exacerbation. Using harmonized household survey data, we show how the income and payroll taxes most rich countries rely on to finance the public sector serve to push households (further) into poverty. We estimate that across rich democracies on average about one in four households in poverty are made poorer on net after taxes and transfers; with fiscal impoverishment levels ranging from <10% in some countries to more than 70% in others, revealing extreme cross-national variation in how the pocketbooks of poor households are impacted by national tax and transfer policy. We go on to show that fiscal impoverishment does not track with standard measures of welfare state generosity but is instead largely determined by design of income tax systems, particularly a country’s relative reliance on (regressive) payroll taxes versus (progressive) income taxes. We consider the implications of fiscal impoverishment for assessing welfare state performance and for comparative poverty research.
{"title":"Fiscal Impoverishment in Rich Democracies","authors":"Manuel Schechtl, Rourke L O’Brien","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad133","url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces fiscal impoverishment as a framework for comparative poverty research. We invert standard analyses of welfare state policy and household poverty by focusing not on poverty alleviation but poverty creation and exacerbation. Using harmonized household survey data, we show how the income and payroll taxes most rich countries rely on to finance the public sector serve to push households (further) into poverty. We estimate that across rich democracies on average about one in four households in poverty are made poorer on net after taxes and transfers; with fiscal impoverishment levels ranging from &lt;10% in some countries to more than 70% in others, revealing extreme cross-national variation in how the pocketbooks of poor households are impacted by national tax and transfer policy. We go on to show that fiscal impoverishment does not track with standard measures of welfare state generosity but is instead largely determined by design of income tax systems, particularly a country’s relative reliance on (regressive) payroll taxes versus (progressive) income taxes. We consider the implications of fiscal impoverishment for assessing welfare state performance and for comparative poverty research.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50167056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We propose that volunteering increases the likelihood of self-employment among young adults because volunteering improves self-esteem, which helps prospective entrepreneurs cope with the challenges associated with self-employment. We further predict that young adults who participate in diverse voluntary organizations are particularly likely to undertake self-employment because affiliations with diverse organizations not only enhance the social-psychological benefits of self-employment but also buffer the potential loss of a source of self-esteem caused by the discontinuation of a voluntary organization. Analysis of the data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (N = 35,228) supports our hypotheses. Our study highlights that a better-developed self through volunteering benefits the agentic action of entrepreneurship.
{"title":"Volunteering in the Creation of Entrepreneurship","authors":"Dali Ma, Cheng Wang","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad132","url":null,"abstract":"We propose that volunteering increases the likelihood of self-employment among young adults because volunteering improves self-esteem, which helps prospective entrepreneurs cope with the challenges associated with self-employment. We further predict that young adults who participate in diverse voluntary organizations are particularly likely to undertake self-employment because affiliations with diverse organizations not only enhance the social-psychological benefits of self-employment but also buffer the potential loss of a source of self-esteem caused by the discontinuation of a voluntary organization. Analysis of the data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (N = 35,228) supports our hypotheses. Our study highlights that a better-developed self through volunteering benefits the agentic action of entrepreneurship.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50167059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brian Rubineau, Shinwon Noh, Michael A Neblo, David M J Lazer
Peers influence students’ academic decisions and outcomes. For example, several studies with strong claims to causality demonstrate that peers affect the choice of and persistence in majors. One remaining issue, however, has stymied efforts to translate this evidence into actionable interventions: the literature has not grappled adequately with the fact that in natural settings, students typically select most of their peers. The bulk of causal evidence for peer influence comes from exogenously assigned peers (e.g., roommates) because peer effects are easier to identify in such cases. However, students do not form their most important ties for the convenience of scientific inference. In order to link theory and practice, we need to understand which peers are influential. We employ longitudinal, multiplex network data on students’ choices of and persistence in their majors from 1260 students across 14 universities to identify likely causal pathways of peer influence via self-selected peers. We introduce time-reversed analysis as a novel tool for addressing some selection concerns in network influence studies. We find that peers with whom a student reports merely spending time, rather than—e.g., close friends, study partners, esteemed peers—consistently and potently influence their college major choice.
{"title":"Pathways of Peer Influence on Major Choice","authors":"Brian Rubineau, Shinwon Noh, Michael A Neblo, David M J Lazer","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad129","url":null,"abstract":"Peers influence students’ academic decisions and outcomes. For example, several studies with strong claims to causality demonstrate that peers affect the choice of and persistence in majors. One remaining issue, however, has stymied efforts to translate this evidence into actionable interventions: the literature has not grappled adequately with the fact that in natural settings, students typically select most of their peers. The bulk of causal evidence for peer influence comes from exogenously assigned peers (e.g., roommates) because peer effects are easier to identify in such cases. However, students do not form their most important ties for the convenience of scientific inference. In order to link theory and practice, we need to understand which peers are influential. We employ longitudinal, multiplex network data on students’ choices of and persistence in their majors from 1260 students across 14 universities to identify likely causal pathways of peer influence via self-selected peers. We introduce time-reversed analysis as a novel tool for addressing some selection concerns in network influence studies. We find that peers with whom a student reports merely spending time, rather than—e.g., close friends, study partners, esteemed peers—consistently and potently influence their college major choice.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50167060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
It has been extensively debated over whether the rise of flexible working arrangements (FWAs) may be an “opportunity” for a more egalitarian gender division of household labor or reinforce the “exploitation” of women in the traditional gender division. Drawing on a linked-lives perspective, this study contributes to the literature by using longitudinal couple-level dyadic data in the UK (2010–2020) to examine how couple-level arrangements of flexible working affect within-couple inequality in time and different types of household labor. The results show that among heterosexual couples, women’s use of FWAs significantly intensifies their disproportionate share of housework and maintains their heavy childcare burden regardless of whether their husbands use FWAs. In contrast, men’s use of FWAs does not change the unequal gendered division of housework and childcare, even when their wives do not use any FWAs. These patterns of intensified gender inequalities are more pronounced in routine housework tasks (e.g., cooking, washing, and cleaning), and among the reduced hours and teleworking arrangements. Overall, rather than providing an “opportunity” for a more egalitarian division of household labor, the use of FWAs maintains or even exacerbates the “exploitation” of women under the existing traditional gender norms.
{"title":"Opportunity or Exploitation? A Longitudinal Dyadic Analysis of Flexible Working Arrangements and Gender Household Labor Inequality","authors":"Senhu Wang, Cheng Cheng","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad125","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad125","url":null,"abstract":"It has been extensively debated over whether the rise of flexible working arrangements (FWAs) may be an “opportunity” for a more egalitarian gender division of household labor or reinforce the “exploitation” of women in the traditional gender division. Drawing on a linked-lives perspective, this study contributes to the literature by using longitudinal couple-level dyadic data in the UK (2010–2020) to examine how couple-level arrangements of flexible working affect within-couple inequality in time and different types of household labor. The results show that among heterosexual couples, women’s use of FWAs significantly intensifies their disproportionate share of housework and maintains their heavy childcare burden regardless of whether their husbands use FWAs. In contrast, men’s use of FWAs does not change the unequal gendered division of housework and childcare, even when their wives do not use any FWAs. These patterns of intensified gender inequalities are more pronounced in routine housework tasks (e.g., cooking, washing, and cleaning), and among the reduced hours and teleworking arrangements. Overall, rather than providing an “opportunity” for a more egalitarian division of household labor, the use of FWAs maintains or even exacerbates the “exploitation” of women under the existing traditional gender norms.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50167062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal Article Review of “Migration, Health, and Inequalities: Critical Activist Research Across Ecuadorean Borders” Get access Review of “Migration, Health, and Inequalities: Critical Activist Research Across Ecuadorean Borders” Roberta Villalón Bristol University Press, 2022, 268 pages, $139.95 (hardback). https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/inequalities-migration-and-health. Heather Randell Heather Randell Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad122, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad122 Published: 02 October 2023 Article history Received: 04 August 2023 Revision received: 04 August 2023 Accepted: 05 September 2023 Published: 02 October 2023
{"title":"Review of “Migration, Health, and Inequalities: Critical Activist Research Across Ecuadorean Borders”","authors":"Heather Randell","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad122","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad122","url":null,"abstract":"Journal Article Review of “Migration, Health, and Inequalities: Critical Activist Research Across Ecuadorean Borders” Get access Review of “Migration, Health, and Inequalities: Critical Activist Research Across Ecuadorean Borders” Roberta Villalón Bristol University Press, 2022, 268 pages, $139.95 (hardback). https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/inequalities-migration-and-health. Heather Randell Heather Randell Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad122, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad122 Published: 02 October 2023 Article history Received: 04 August 2023 Revision received: 04 August 2023 Accepted: 05 September 2023 Published: 02 October 2023","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135900260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Journal Article Review of “Good News for Common Goods: Multicultural Evangelicalism and Ethical Democracy in America” Get access Review of “Good News for Common Goods: Multicultural Evangelicalism and Ethical Democracy in America” By Wes Markofski Oxford University Press, 2023. 406 pages. $125.00 (hardcover), $34.95 (paperback), https://global.oup.com/academic/product/good-news-for-common-goods-9780197659694?cc=us&lang=en& Richard L Wood Richard L Wood Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad115, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad115 Published: 02 October 2023 Article history Received: 27 August 2023 Accepted: 05 September 2023 Published: 02 October 2023
{"title":"Review of “Good News for Common Goods: Multicultural Evangelicalism and Ethical Democracy in America”","authors":"Richard L Wood","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad115","url":null,"abstract":"Journal Article Review of “Good News for Common Goods: Multicultural Evangelicalism and Ethical Democracy in America” Get access Review of “Good News for Common Goods: Multicultural Evangelicalism and Ethical Democracy in America” By Wes Markofski Oxford University Press, 2023. 406 pages. $125.00 (hardcover), $34.95 (paperback), https://global.oup.com/academic/product/good-news-for-common-goods-9780197659694?cc=us&lang=en& Richard L Wood Richard L Wood Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Social Forces, soad115, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad115 Published: 02 October 2023 Article history Received: 27 August 2023 Accepted: 05 September 2023 Published: 02 October 2023","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135899192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sam Friedman, Christoph Ellersgaard, Aaron Reeves, Anton Grau Larsen
Abstract Elites often use merit to explain, justify, and make sense of their advantaged positions. But what exactly do they mean by this? In this paper, we draw on 71 interviews with elites in Denmark and the UK to compare self-justifications of meritocratic legitimacy. Our results indicate that while elites in both countries are united by a common concern to frame their merits as spontaneously recognized by others (rather than strategically promoted by themselves), the package of attributes they foreground vary significantly. In the UK, elites tend to be “talent meritocrats” who foreground their unique capacity for ideational creativity or risk taking, innately good judgment, and “natural” aptitude, intelligence, or academic ability. In contrast, in Denmark, elites are more likely to be “hard work meritocrats” who emphasize their unusual work ethic, extensive experience (as a signal of accumulated hard work), and contributions outside of work, particularly in civil society. We tentatively argue that one explanation for this cross-national variation is the role that different channels of elite recruitment play in amplifying legitimate notions of merit. In the UK, for example, elite private schools act to nurture ideas of exceptionalism and natural talent, whereas in Denmark elite employers socialize the connection between hard work and success. These findings suggest that nationally specific understandings of merit can have quite different implications for the legitimation of inequality.
{"title":"The Meaning of Merit: Talent versus Hard Work Legitimacy","authors":"Sam Friedman, Christoph Ellersgaard, Aaron Reeves, Anton Grau Larsen","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad131","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Elites often use merit to explain, justify, and make sense of their advantaged positions. But what exactly do they mean by this? In this paper, we draw on 71 interviews with elites in Denmark and the UK to compare self-justifications of meritocratic legitimacy. Our results indicate that while elites in both countries are united by a common concern to frame their merits as spontaneously recognized by others (rather than strategically promoted by themselves), the package of attributes they foreground vary significantly. In the UK, elites tend to be “talent meritocrats” who foreground their unique capacity for ideational creativity or risk taking, innately good judgment, and “natural” aptitude, intelligence, or academic ability. In contrast, in Denmark, elites are more likely to be “hard work meritocrats” who emphasize their unusual work ethic, extensive experience (as a signal of accumulated hard work), and contributions outside of work, particularly in civil society. We tentatively argue that one explanation for this cross-national variation is the role that different channels of elite recruitment play in amplifying legitimate notions of merit. In the UK, for example, elite private schools act to nurture ideas of exceptionalism and natural talent, whereas in Denmark elite employers socialize the connection between hard work and success. These findings suggest that nationally specific understandings of merit can have quite different implications for the legitimation of inequality.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136343364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brienna Perelli-Harris, Jane Zavisca, Nataliia Levchuk, Theodore P Gerber
Abstract Ukraine is currently experiencing the largest human displacement crisis in the world. However, armed conflict that started in 2014 had already displaced nearly 1.8 million people in Ukraine, resulting in the largest internally displaced population in Europe. Although ethnically and culturally similar to the local population, Ukrainian Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) encounter severe economic, housing, and social challenges, as well as residual trauma from violence. In this study we examine the extent to which the subjective well-being (SWB) of IDPs differs from locals who were not displaced. We explore whether the difference in subjective well-being between IDPs and locals is due to economic hardship, inadequate housing, and/or weak social support. Using a unique survey conducted in 2018 and OLS regression methods, we find a sizable gap in SWB between IDPs and locals. The gap shrinks after accounting for economic and housing status, and support from local networks. Measures of loss in housing and social networks additionally account for the gap. However, none of the factors we measure can account for the difference between locals and IDPs who reported only leaving due to violence, pointing to the enduring impact of trauma on SWB.
{"title":"Internal Displacement and Subjective Well-Being: The Case of Ukraine in 2018","authors":"Brienna Perelli-Harris, Jane Zavisca, Nataliia Levchuk, Theodore P Gerber","doi":"10.1093/sf/soad124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soad124","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ukraine is currently experiencing the largest human displacement crisis in the world. However, armed conflict that started in 2014 had already displaced nearly 1.8 million people in Ukraine, resulting in the largest internally displaced population in Europe. Although ethnically and culturally similar to the local population, Ukrainian Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) encounter severe economic, housing, and social challenges, as well as residual trauma from violence. In this study we examine the extent to which the subjective well-being (SWB) of IDPs differs from locals who were not displaced. We explore whether the difference in subjective well-being between IDPs and locals is due to economic hardship, inadequate housing, and/or weak social support. Using a unique survey conducted in 2018 and OLS regression methods, we find a sizable gap in SWB between IDPs and locals. The gap shrinks after accounting for economic and housing status, and support from local networks. Measures of loss in housing and social networks additionally account for the gap. However, none of the factors we measure can account for the difference between locals and IDPs who reported only leaving due to violence, pointing to the enduring impact of trauma on SWB.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136343365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：