Public Administration Review最新文献

英文中文

Invisible and indispensable: Using the lowly request for proposals to advance public value 无形而不可或缺：利用低级的招标书提升公共价值

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13807

Weston Merrick, Pete Bernardy, Patrick Carter

Requests for Proposals (RFP) may be the pinnacle of bureaucratic mundanity. Yet, hidden within this apparent monotony are powerful tools to advance public values. Federal, state, and local government grants deploy staggering sums, reaching into the hundreds of billions of dollars annually. With these distributions, the executive branch is often delegated substantial discretion. These are choices of consequence, but little support exists for public managers tasked with this work. This article examines the potential to improve administrative decision‐making by enhancing our understanding of how discretion is authorized and applied regarding RFPs. Drawing from professional experience, we create a framework to identify dimensions of discretion in these proposals and apply it to a Minnesota case. We end with a call for academics and practitioners to better partner on empirical inquiry that improves RFP administration; in doing so, there is immense potential to help civil servants to improve outcomes for the public.

征求建议书（RFP）可能是官僚主义的最高境界。然而，在这看似单调的工作中却隐藏着推进公共价值的强大工具。联邦、州和地方政府的拨款数额惊人，每年高达数千亿美元。在这些拨款中，行政部门往往被赋予很大的自由裁量权。这些都是事关重大的选择，但负责这项工作的公共管理人员却很少得到支持。本文通过加强我们对如何授权和应用 RFP 自由裁量权的理解，探讨了改进行政决策的潜力。借鉴专业经验，我们创建了一个框架来识别这些建议书中自由裁量权的各个层面，并将其应用于明尼苏达州的一个案例。最后，我们呼吁学术界和实务界更好地合作，开展实证调查，以改进 RFP 管理；这样做，将有巨大的潜力帮助公务员为公众改善成果。

引用次数: 0

Focusing on the individual in cross-sectoral collaboration: A configurational approach 在跨部门合作中关注个人：配置方法

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13798

Khaldoun AbouAssi, Sungdae Lim, Ann O' M. Bowman, Jocelyn M. Johnston

Research focuses on various macro and meso aspects of collaboration and less on the individuals who make decisions about their organizations' collaborations. Organizational leaders make these decisions based on their interpretations, influenced by their personal characteristics. Existing studies examining organizational outcomes such as a decision to collaborate typically consider these characteristics separately and independently, ignoring the reality that a leader's characteristics jointly and interactively shape perspectives, attitudes, and behaviors. We focus on five prominent characteristics in the literature—gender, educational attainment, prior cross-sector experience, current cross-sector affiliation, and tenure in position—and study their configurational dynamics regarding the organization-level outcome—the propensity of cross-sector collaboration. We employ qualitative comparative analysis to develop and test a configurational model for cross-sector collaboration, using survey data of local government and nonprofit leaders in Lebanon. The analysis offers exploratory insights into four configurational types of leaders whose organizations opt to collaborate at the local level.

研究侧重于协作的各种宏观和中观方面，而较少关注为组织协作做出决策的个人。组织领导者根据自己的理解做出这些决定，并受到其个人特征的影响。现有研究在考察组织合作决策等组织结果时，通常会单独考虑这些特征，而忽略了领导者的特征会共同、交互地影响观点、态度和行为这一现实。我们聚焦于文献中的五个突出特征--性别、教育程度、先前的跨部门经验、当前的跨部门隶属关系以及职位任期--研究它们与组织层面的结果--跨部门合作倾向--之间的配置动态关系。我们采用定性比较分析方法，利用对黎巴嫩地方政府和非营利组织领导人的调查数据，建立并检验了跨部门合作的配置模型。通过分析，我们探索性地了解了组织选择在地方层面开展合作的领导者的四种配置类型。

{"title":"Focusing on the individual in cross-sectoral collaboration: A configurational approach","authors":"Khaldoun AbouAssi, Sungdae Lim, Ann O' M. Bowman, Jocelyn M. Johnston","doi":"10.1111/puar.13798","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13798","url":null,"abstract":"Research focuses on various macro and meso aspects of collaboration and less on the individuals who make decisions about their organizations' collaborations. Organizational leaders make these decisions based on their interpretations, influenced by their personal characteristics. Existing studies examining organizational outcomes such as a decision to collaborate typically consider these characteristics separately and independently, ignoring the reality that a leader's characteristics jointly and interactively shape perspectives, attitudes, and behaviors. We focus on five prominent characteristics in the literature—gender, educational attainment, prior cross-sector experience, current cross-sector affiliation, and tenure in position—and study their configurational dynamics regarding the organization-level outcome—the propensity of cross-sector collaboration. We employ qualitative comparative analysis to develop and test a configurational model for cross-sector collaboration, using survey data of local government and nonprofit leaders in Lebanon. The analysis offers exploratory insights into four configurational types of leaders whose organizations opt to collaborate at the local level.","PeriodicalId":48431,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139994751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Global risk management: The role of collective cognition in response to COVID‐19. By LouiseComfort, Mary LeeRhodes, New York and London: Routledge. 2022. pp. 291. ISBN: 978‐1‐032‐18182‐0 全球风险管理：集体认知在应对 COVID-19 中的作用》。路易丝-康福特（LouiseComfort）、玛丽-李-罗兹（Mary LeeRhodes）著，纽约和伦敦：Routledge.2022. pp.ISBN: 978-1-032-18182-0

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13802

Paul Schulman

引用次数: 0

Advancing open access to PAR 推动开放式获取 PAR

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13801

Katherine Willoughby, Jos Raadschelders, Hongtao Yi, Preston Phillips

引用次数: 0

Moving from coproduction to commonization of digital public goods and services 数字公共产品和服务从共同生产走向共同化

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13795

Sébastien Shulz

The hybridization of digital commons and public administration institutions led by bureaucratic entrepreneurs is a relatively recent phenomenon that has received limited attention in the literature. The term coined to describe this evolution is the “commonization” of digital public goods and services. I define commonization as the integration of shared property, peer production, and self-governance into public administration. To explore the democratizing potential of commonization, I conducted a qualitative study comparing two case studies in France and Spain (Barcelona). My approach involves 44 semistructured interviews and online observations analyzed through the analytical framework of institutional work. The findings highlight five factors that enhance, and two that hinder, citizen power in co-governance arrangements. In conclusion, I identify the theoretical and practical implications of commonizing digital public goods and services, providing valuable insights for practitioners and scholars, particularly in the New Public Governance paradigm.

数字公域与官僚企业家领导的公共行政机构的混合是一个相对较新的现象，在文献中受到的关注有限。描述这一演变的术语是数字公共产品和服务的 "共同化"。我将 "共同化 "定义为将共享财产、同侪生产和自治融入公共管理。为了探索共同化的民主化潜力，我进行了一项定性研究，比较了法国和西班牙（巴塞罗那）的两个案例研究。我的研究方法包括 44 个半结构式访谈和在线观察，并通过机构工作分析框架进行分析。研究结果强调了在共同治理安排中增强公民权力的五个因素和阻碍公民权力的两个因素。最后，我指出了数字公共产品和服务共同化的理论和实践意义，为实践者和学者，尤其是新公共治理范式的实践者和学者提供了宝贵的见解。

引用次数: 0

Public service motivation and public sector employment in Korea 韩国公务员的积极性和公共部门的就业情况

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13796

Harin Woo, Sangmook Kim

This study aims to investigate whether individual differences in public service motivation (PSM) between the public and private sectors are a cause or a consequence of choosing a job, testing self-selection and socialization hypotheses using a longitudinal dataset from a nationally representative cohort in Korea. The study uses two samples from the data of three successive waves (t − 2, t, t + 2) surveyed biennially, finding that “self-selection” can more persuasively explain the state that employees in the public sector have higher levels of PSM than those in the private sector, with job seekers with high PSM levels being more likely to work in the public sector and with the magnitude of differences in PSM between the public and private sectors maintained through the early years after entry into the workplace, while the levels of PSM, however, decrease in all job sectors. Implications of our findings are discussed.

本研究旨在探讨公共部门和私营部门之间公共服务动机（PSM）的个体差异是选择工作的原因还是结果，利用韩国具有全国代表性的队列纵向数据集检验自我选择和社会化假设。研究使用了两个样本，分别来自每两年调查一次的三个连续波次（t - 2、t、t + 2）的数据，发现 "自我选择 "能更有说服力地解释公共部门雇员的 PSM 水平高于私营部门雇员的状况，PSM 水平高的求职者更有可能在公共部门工作，公共部门和私营部门之间的 PSM 差异幅度在进入职场后的最初几年一直保持不变，而 PSM 水平在所有工作部门都会下降。本文讨论了研究结果的影响。

引用次数: 0

Benefit and hidden cost of organizational support for telework amid the COVID-19 pandemic on public employees' job satisfaction and retention intention COVID-19大流行期间组织支持远程工作对公职人员工作满意度和留任意愿的益处和隐性成本

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13797

Namhoon Ki, David Lee

This study examines the impact of crisis-induced telework during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020 on public sector employees' job satisfaction (JS) and retention intention (RI). Analyses of the 2020 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey data reveal a negative association between the amount of COVID-induced telework and the federal employees' JS and RI. However, this negative effect is mitigated by offering adequate organizational telework support for mandatory telework during the COVID peak and subsequently decreasing the amount of telework after the peak. Nevertheless, the findings also indicate that solid organizational support for teleworkers during the pandemic's peak can ironically discourage them from returning to the regular work setting even when it is safe, potentially compromising organizational performance—a hidden cost of the organizational support. Still, this hidden cost does not appear to be significant enough to warrant revisions in the level of crisis-specific organizational support.

本研究探讨了 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间危机引发的远程工作对公共部门雇员工作满意度（JS）和留任意愿（RI）的影响。对 2020 年联邦雇员观点调查数据的分析表明，COVID 引发的远程工作数量与联邦雇员的工作满意度和留任意愿之间存在负相关。然而，通过在 COVID 高峰期为强制性远程工作提供充分的组织远程工作支持，并在高峰期过后减少远程工作的数量，这种负面影响得到了缓解。尽管如此，研究结果还表明，在大流行病高峰期为远程工作人员提供坚实的组织支持，会具有讽刺意味地阻碍他们返回正常的工作环境，即使在安全的情况下，这可能会影响组织绩效--这是组织支持的隐性成本。尽管如此，这种隐性成本似乎还没有大到需要修改针对危机的组织支持水平的地步。

引用次数: 0

The effectiveness-equity tradeoff when resources decline: Evidence from environmental policy implementation in the U.S. states 资源减少时的效益-公平权衡：美国各州环境政策实施的证据

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-01-14 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13784

Sanghee Park, Jiaqi Liang

Despite a voluminous literature on resource availability and the implications for organizational performance, little is known about how changes in government agencies' resources impact their policy implementation activities and goal prioritization. This article explores how changes in resources affect regulatory enforcement activities by types of resources and policy implementation activities, and whether resource cutbacks prompt a tradeoff of the effectiveness-equity goals. Using the block-group level data on the Clean Air Act (CAA) implementation from 2012 to 2019, we find that state environmental agencies prioritize regulatory effectiveness over environmental justice by concentrating their resources on communities where task demands correspond to organizations' core missions. They also promote social equity to some extent when facing spending cutbacks but not staffing cuts. Spending cutbacks had a less severe impact on compliance inspections for more socially vulnerable communities, while those exposed to more imminent environmental harms received more inspections.

尽管关于资源可用性及其对组织绩效的影响的文献很多，但人们对政府机构资源的变化如何影响其政策实施活动和目标优先次序却知之甚少。本文按资源类型和政策实施活动探讨了资源变化对监管执法活动的影响，以及资源削减是否会导致有效性-公平性目标的权衡。利用 2012 年至 2019 年《清洁空气法案》（CAA）执行情况的组块级数据，我们发现，州环境机构通过将资源集中在任务需求与机构核心使命相符的社区，优先考虑监管有效性而非环境公正性。在面临支出削减而非人员削减时，这些机构也会在一定程度上促进社会公平。支出削减对社会弱势社区的合规检查影响较小，而对那些面临更紧迫环境危害的社区的检查则更多。

引用次数: 0

Public values and sector service delivery preferences: Public preferences on contracting from simple to complex human services 公众价值观与部门服务提供偏好：公众对从简单到复杂的人类服务合同的偏好

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2024-01-07 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13794

Jaclyn Piatak, Colt Jensen

Nonprofit and for-profit providers play an increasing role in public service delivery, but we know little about what shapes public service delivery preferences. Responding to calls to put the “public” back in public values theory, we examine the influence of public values on sector service delivery preferences for government, nonprofit, or for-profit delivery across six service areas ranging from simple services such as trash collection to complex services such as child welfare. We find equity predicts a preference for government service delivery across areas, while efficiency corresponds to a preference for for-profit service delivery. Nonprofit sector preferences varied across service areas; equity corresponds to simple services such as street maintenance, whereas effectiveness corresponds to complex human services such as elder care. Public administrators should be cognizant of the public value trade-offs that underlie sector preferences for public services to design and implement service arrangements in line with the preferences of the public they serve.

非营利性和营利性机构在公共服务提供中发挥着越来越重要的作用，但我们对公共服务提供偏好的形成因素知之甚少。为了响应将 "公共 "重新纳入公共价值理论的呼声，我们研究了公共价值对政府、非营利或营利部门提供服务偏好的影响，涉及六个服务领域，从垃圾收集等简单服务到儿童福利等复杂服务。我们发现，在各个领域，公平预示着对政府服务提供的偏好，而效率则对应着对营利性服务提供的偏好。非营利部门对不同服务领域的偏好各不相同；公平性与街道维护等简单服务相对应，而效率性则与老年人护理等复杂的人类服务相对应。公共管理者应认识到公共服务部门偏好的公共价值权衡，以设计和实施符合其所服务的公众偏好的服务安排。

引用次数: 0

Information for Contributors 投稿须知

IF 8.3 1区管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Public Administration Review

Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI: 10.1111/puar.13792

About the Journal

Public Administration Review (PAR) is dedicated to advancing theory and practice in public administration. PAR serves a wide range of audiences globally. As the preeminent professional journal in public administration, Public Administration Review (PAR) strives to publish research that not only advances the science and theory of public administration, but also incorporates and addresses the realities of the practice of public administration.

The PAR editorial team takes pride in our rigorous review process. Although we strive for rigor, we also seek to provide quality service to our contributors. Operationally, this means we try to offer high quality, timely feedback. The standard time for full peer review is typically less than 90 days from receipt of a manuscript to an editor’s decision. If our internal editorial review concludes a manuscript is not suitable for full peer review, then we usually have a decision to authors within 14 days after submission of a manuscript.

As a professional journal, PAR encourages submissions from both scholars and practitioners. Regardless of the affiliations of our authors, our readers value research informed by practice and practice informed by research. Since its founding in 1940, PAR has regularly published articles contributed by practitioners.

关于期刊《公共行政评论》（PAR）致力于推动公共行政理论与实践的发展。公共行政评论》的读者遍布全球。作为公共管理领域最杰出的专业期刊，《公共管理评论》（PAR）致力于发表不仅能推动公共管理科学和理论发展，而且能结合并解决公共管理实践现实问题的研究成果。尽管我们力求严谨，但我们也力求为投稿者提供优质服务。在操作上，这意味着我们努力提供高质量的及时反馈。从收到稿件到编辑做出决定，全面同行评审的标准时间一般不超过 90 天。如果我们的内部编辑审查认为稿件不适合进行全面同行评审，那么我们通常会在稿件提交后 14 天内向作者做出决定。作为一份专业期刊，《PAR》鼓励学者和从业人员投稿。作为专业期刊，《PAR》鼓励学者和从业人员投稿。无论作者属于哪个组织，我们的读者都重视以实践为依据的研究和以研究为依据的实践。自1940年创刊以来，《PAR》定期发表实践者撰写的文章。

{"title":"Information for Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/puar.13792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13792","url":null,"abstract":"<h2> About the Journal</h2>\u0000Public Administration Review (PAR) is dedicated to advancing theory and practice in public administration. PAR serves a wide range of audiences globally. As the preeminent professional journal in public administration, Public Administration Review (PAR) strives to publish research that not only advances the science and theory of public administration, but also incorporates and addresses the realities of the practice of public administration.\u0000The PAR editorial team takes pride in our rigorous review process. Although we strive for rigor, we also seek to provide quality service to our contributors. Operationally, this means we try to offer high quality, timely feedback. The standard time for full peer review is typically less than 90 days from receipt of a manuscript to an editor’s decision. If our internal editorial review concludes a manuscript is not suitable for full peer review, then we usually have a decision to authors within 14 days after submission of a manuscript.\u0000As a professional journal, PAR encourages submissions from both scholars and practitioners. Regardless of the affiliations of our authors, our readers value research informed by practice and practice informed by research. Since its founding in 1940, PAR has regularly published articles contributed by practitioners.","PeriodicalId":48431,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration Review","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139041668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Public Administration Review

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀