Sustainable Production and Consumption最新文献_第10页

Evaluating the sustainability and commercial viability of conventional and traditional bone tissue scaffold fabrication methods 评估传统和传统骨组织支架制造方法的可持续性和商业可行性

IF 9.6 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.010

Lillian Tsitsi Mambiri , Riley Guillory , Dilip Depan

Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is critical for addressing bone defects caused by aging populations, chronic diseases, and millions of annual road injuries, yet its potential is hampered by high costs, regulatory delays that deter investment, and healthcare's environmental footprint, which accounts for 8.5 % of the United States' emissions and continues to rise. BTE advancement must prioritize affordability, regulatory efficiency, and climate-conscious innovation to ensure equitable access and sustainability. This work conducts a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and entropy-weighted sustainability indices (SI), a data-driven overall score that weighs economic and environmental metrics by their variability, of stereolithography (SLA) three-dimensional (3D) printing and electrospinning (ES) for polycaprolactone-based scaffold preparation. Results show SLA reduces energy demand per kilogram of scaffold compared to ES, attributed to ES's energy-intensive solvent evaporation and high-voltage fiber formation. When bioactive nanofillers were incorporated, SLA remained cost-competitive and environmentally favorable, whereas ES showed steep increases in energy use, solvent consumption, and ecotoxicity, largely attributed to chloroform. Entropy-weighted SI values reflected these trends: SLA led the ranking, its nanofiller variant remained viable, while ES (with and without nanofillers) performed poorest due to compounded environmental and economic burdens. Adopting solvent recovery systems, such as condensation and closed-loop recycling as well as green solvents and renewable energy, could trim the high energy demand and solvent-intensive processes.

骨组织工程（BTE）对于解决由人口老龄化、慢性病和每年数百万的道路伤害引起的骨缺损至关重要，但其潜力受到高成本、阻碍投资的监管延误以及医疗保健的环境足迹的阻碍，后者占美国排放量的8.5%，并且还在继续上升。BTE的发展必须优先考虑可负担性、监管效率和气候意识创新，以确保公平获取和可持续性。这项工作进行了生命周期评估（LCA）、技术经济分析（TEA）和熵加权可持续性指数（SI）的比较，这是一种数据驱动的总分，通过其可变性来衡量经济和环境指标，用于聚己内酯基支架制备的立体光刻（SLA）、三维（3D）打印和静电纺丝（ES）。结果表明，与ES相比，SLA降低了每千克支架的能量需求，这归功于ES的高能耗溶剂蒸发和高压纤维形成。当加入生物活性纳米填料时，SLA仍然具有成本竞争力和环境优势，而ES则显示出能源使用、溶剂消耗和生态毒性的急剧增加，主要归因于氯仿。熵加权SI值反映了这些趋势：SLA排名第一，其纳米填料变体仍然可行，而ES（有或没有纳米填料）由于复杂的环境和经济负担而表现最差。采用溶剂回收系统，如冷凝和闭环回收，以及绿色溶剂和可再生能源，可以减少高能耗和溶剂密集型工艺。

{"title":"Evaluating the sustainability and commercial viability of conventional and traditional bone tissue scaffold fabrication methods","authors":"Lillian Tsitsi Mambiri , Riley Guillory , Dilip Depan","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is critical for addressing bone defects caused by aging populations, chronic diseases, and millions of annual road injuries, yet its potential is hampered by high costs, regulatory delays that deter investment, and healthcare's environmental footprint, which accounts for 8.5 % of the United States' emissions and continues to rise. BTE advancement must prioritize affordability, regulatory efficiency, and climate-conscious innovation to ensure equitable access and sustainability. This work conducts a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and entropy-weighted sustainability indices (SI), a data-driven overall score that weighs economic and environmental metrics by their variability, of stereolithography (SLA) three-dimensional (3D) printing and electrospinning (ES) for polycaprolactone-based scaffold preparation. Results show SLA reduces energy demand per kilogram of scaffold compared to ES, attributed to ES's energy-intensive solvent evaporation and high-voltage fiber formation. When bioactive nanofillers were incorporated, SLA remained cost-competitive and environmentally favorable, whereas ES showed steep increases in energy use, solvent consumption, and ecotoxicity, largely attributed to chloroform. Entropy-weighted SI values reflected these trends: SLA led the ranking, its nanofiller variant remained viable, while ES (with and without nanofillers) performed poorest due to compounded environmental and economic burdens. Adopting solvent recovery systems, such as condensation and closed-loop recycling as well as green solvents and renewable energy, could trim the high energy demand and solvent-intensive processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 432-447"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144748751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Assessing circular economy at company level: Comparison of tools and methodological challenges 在公司层面评估循环经济：工具和方法挑战的比较

IF 9.6 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.002

Beatrice Bais , Margherita Molinaro , Guido Orzes

While circular economy adoption is growing worldwide, its systematic assessment remains a challenge. This paper aims to shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of firm-level circular economy assessment tools and to theorize on the circular economy assessment issue. Four tools were selected and compared based on a qualitative comparative analysis as well as on their practical application to multiple case studies. The originality of this comparison lies in evaluating the extent to which these tools are affected by ontological and etymological issues and by epistemological and human cognitive bias. Such an evaluation was based on seven criteria rooted in the interpretivist research paradigm and grounded theory methodology. The results indicate that, albeit providing circular economy awareness and insights on high-level strategic circular economy practices, the tools can be improved in terms of transferability, credibility, confirmability, fit, and generality. Current holistic tools fail to consider some firms' specificities and to provide circular economy implications, besides being subject to user manipulation due to issues such as low reliability and human bias. Accordingly, the study provides suggestions to improve the development of future circular economy assessment tools and enhance practitioners' awareness of the effective use of these tools, having both academic and practical implications.

虽然循环经济的采用在全球范围内不断增长，但其系统评估仍然是一个挑战。本文旨在揭示企业层面循环经济评估工具的优缺点，并对循环经济评估问题进行理论化。根据定性比较分析及其在多个案例研究中的实际应用，选择并比较了四种工具。这种比较的独创性在于评估这些工具受本体论和词源学问题以及认识论和人类认知偏见影响的程度。这种评价基于七个标准，这些标准植根于解释主义研究范式和扎根理论方法论。结果表明，尽管这些工具提供了循环经济意识和高层次战略循环经济实践的见解，但在可转移性、可信度、可确认性、适合性和通用性方面仍有待改进。目前的整体工具没有考虑到一些公司的特殊性，也没有提供循环经济的影响，此外，由于可靠性低和人为偏见等问题，它们还会受到用户的操纵。因此，本研究为未来循环经济评估工具的发展提供了建议，并提高了从业者有效使用这些工具的意识，具有学术和实践意义。

{"title":"Assessing circular economy at company level: Comparison of tools and methodological challenges","authors":"Beatrice Bais , Margherita Molinaro , Guido Orzes","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While circular economy adoption is growing worldwide, its systematic assessment remains a challenge. This paper aims to shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of firm-level circular economy assessment tools and to theorize on the circular economy assessment issue. Four tools were selected and compared based on a qualitative comparative analysis as well as on their practical application to multiple case studies. The originality of this comparison lies in evaluating the extent to which these tools are affected by ontological and etymological issues and by epistemological and human cognitive bias. Such an evaluation was based on seven criteria rooted in the interpretivist research paradigm and grounded theory methodology. The results indicate that, albeit providing circular economy awareness and insights on high-level strategic circular economy practices, the tools can be improved in terms of transferability, credibility, confirmability, fit, and generality. Current holistic tools fail to consider some firms' specificities and to provide circular economy implications, besides being subject to user manipulation due to issues such as low reliability and human bias. Accordingly, the study provides suggestions to improve the development of future circular economy assessment tools and enhance practitioners' awareness of the effective use of these tools, having both academic and practical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 112-126"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144860567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reducing environmental pressure through a more circular consumption of clothes 通过更循环的服装消费来减少环境压力

IF 10.9 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.007

Julia Koch , Harry Wilting , Kees Vringer , Linda Steg , Ellen van der Werff

Clothing production and consumption contribute to various environmental problems, such as climate change and environmental pollution. With the expected growth in demand, these negative effects will only increase. Consumers making sustainable choices in the acquisition, use and disposal of garments can play a critical role in the reduction of such environmental pressures. This study, taking a circular economy perspective, assesses to what extent the adoption of circular consumer behaviour in the Netherlands could reduce environmental pressures related to clothing and which behavioural changes are most effective in doing so.

In our analysis we incorporated 14 types of behaviours, all based on a framework for consumer options related to the circular economy. To provide a realistic estimation of the environmental reduction potential of these behaviours, we not only calculated the theoretical environmental reduction potential of each behaviour but also considered behavioural plasticity (i.e., the share of consumers that do not yet engage in a behaviour but would be willing to do so) and interactions between behaviours. The theoretical reduction potential was calculated with a combination of input-output- and process analysis, and the behavioural plasticity was based on survey data of a study among Dutch consumers.

Our results show that a more circular consumption of clothing in the Netherlands could reduce approximately 11–19 % of greenhouse gas emissions and approximately 3–29 % of land use related to clothing. Buying fewer new clothes, and choosing more durable garments, garments made from more environmentally-friendly and from recycled materials are behaviours that have the highest reduction potential when behavioural plasticity is considered. Renting clothes, buying second-hand, repairing, and changes in washing and drying behaviour have a lower reduction potential.

服装的生产和消费导致了各种环境问题，如气候变化和环境污染。随着需求的预期增长，这些负面影响只会增加。消费者在购买、使用和处置服装方面做出可持续的选择，可以在减少这种环境压力方面发挥关键作用。本研究从循环经济的角度，评估了荷兰采用循环消费行为在多大程度上可以减少与服装有关的环境压力，以及哪些行为改变在这方面最有效。在我们的分析中，我们纳入了14种类型的行为，所有这些行为都基于与循环经济相关的消费者选择框架。为了提供对这些行为的环境减少潜力的现实估计，我们不仅计算了每种行为的理论环境减少潜力，还考虑了行为可塑性（即尚未参与但愿意这样做的消费者份额）和行为之间的相互作用。理论减少潜力是通过投入产出和过程分析的结合来计算的，行为可塑性是基于荷兰消费者研究的调查数据。我们的研究结果表明，在荷兰，更加循环的服装消费可以减少约11 - 19%的温室气体排放，并减少约3 - 29%与服装相关的土地使用。少买新衣服，选择更耐用的衣服，更环保的衣服和回收材料制成的衣服，当考虑到行为可塑性时，这些行为具有最大的减少潜力。租用衣服、购买二手衣服、修理衣服以及改变洗涤和烘干行为的可能性较低。

{"title":"Reducing environmental pressure through a more circular consumption of clothes","authors":"Julia Koch , Harry Wilting , Kees Vringer , Linda Steg , Ellen van der Werff","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clothing production and consumption contribute to various environmental problems, such as climate change and environmental pollution. With the expected growth in demand, these negative effects will only increase. Consumers making sustainable choices in the acquisition, use and disposal of garments can play a critical role in the reduction of such environmental pressures. This study, taking a circular economy perspective, assesses to what extent the adoption of circular consumer behaviour in the Netherlands could reduce environmental pressures related to clothing and which behavioural changes are most effective in doing so.</div><div>In our analysis we incorporated 14 types of behaviours, all based on a framework for consumer options related to the circular economy. To provide a realistic estimation of the environmental reduction potential of these behaviours, we not only calculated the theoretical environmental reduction potential of each behaviour but also considered behavioural plasticity (i.e., the share of consumers that do not yet engage in a behaviour but would be willing to do so) and interactions between behaviours. The theoretical reduction potential was calculated with a combination of input-output- and process analysis, and the behavioural plasticity was based on survey data of a study among Dutch consumers.</div><div>Our results show that a more circular consumption of clothing in the Netherlands could reduce approximately 11–19 % of greenhouse gas emissions and approximately 3–29 % of land use related to clothing. Buying fewer new clothes, and choosing more durable garments, garments made from more environmentally-friendly and from recycled materials are behaviours that have the highest reduction potential when behavioural plasticity is considered. Renting clothes, buying second-hand, repairing, and changes in washing and drying behaviour have a lower reduction potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 396-411"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144704361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Unveiling hidden environmental costs and optimizing sustainable BATs screening in finished fabrics production: An LCA-based approach 揭示隐藏的环境成本并优化成品织物生产中的可持续bat筛选：基于lca的方法

IF 10.9 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.006

Siyuan Zhang , Jingjing Gan , Quan Zhou , Chenye Xu , Chensi Shen , Fang Li

The implementation of best available techniques (BATs) is crucial for the sustainable development of the textile industry. However, the selection of BATs is typically based on technical feasibility and immediate environmental benefits, while neglecting comprehensive environmental impacts and hidden costs. This study developed a comprehensive method integrating life cycle assessment (LCA), environmental price, and the VIKOR model with the entropy weight method to evaluate the environmental performance and hidden costs associated with the production of finished fabrics, and to screen sustainable BATs. The results revealed that the overall environmental burden of polyester finished fabrics was 13.30 % lower than that of cotton based on the normalized results. Fiber production was identified as the primary contributor to environmental loads, accounting for an average of 50.67 % of the total environmental burden in the cotton finished fabrics, and 57.75 % in the polyester, respectively. In monetary terms, cotton incurred a higher cost of € 9256.08 per ton, compared to € 4646.72 for polyester, indicating superior eco-efficiency. Additionally, BAT 24 (foam coating technology), BAT 17 (supercritical carbon dioxide dyeing), and BAT 29 (control of mineral oils and sizing agents) were selected as the top priority BATs for sustainable development. These findings highlight the importance of selecting fabrics based on both environmental sustainability and economic considerations. Moreover, the adoption of sustainable BATs can enhance both environmental and economic performance across the textile production value chain.

实施最佳可用技术对纺织工业的可持续发展至关重要。然而，bat的选择通常基于技术可行性和直接环境效益，而忽略了综合环境影响和隐性成本。本研究提出了一种综合生命周期评估（LCA）、环境价格、VIKOR模型和熵权法的方法来评估成品面料生产的环境绩效和隐性成本，并筛选可持续的BATs。结果表明，根据归一化结果，涤纶整理织物的整体环境负担比棉织物低13.30%。纤维生产被确定为环境负荷的主要贡献者，平均占棉织物总环境负荷的50.67%，涤纶占57.75%。从货币角度来看，棉花的成本为每吨9256.08欧元，而聚酯的成本为每吨4646.72欧元，这表明其生态效率更高。此外，bat24（泡沫涂层技术）、bat17（超临界二氧化碳染色）和bat29（矿物油和施胶剂控制）被选为可持续发展的重点BAT。这些发现强调了基于环境可持续性和经济考虑选择织物的重要性。此外，采用可持续的bat可以提高整个纺织品生产价值链的环境和经济绩效。

{"title":"Unveiling hidden environmental costs and optimizing sustainable BATs screening in finished fabrics production: An LCA-based approach","authors":"Siyuan Zhang , Jingjing Gan , Quan Zhou , Chenye Xu , Chensi Shen , Fang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The implementation of best available techniques (BATs) is crucial for the sustainable development of the textile industry. However, the selection of BATs is typically based on technical feasibility and immediate environmental benefits, while neglecting comprehensive environmental impacts and hidden costs. This study developed a comprehensive method integrating life cycle assessment (LCA), environmental price, and the VIKOR model with the entropy weight method to evaluate the environmental performance and hidden costs associated with the production of finished fabrics, and to screen sustainable BATs. The results revealed that the overall environmental burden of polyester finished fabrics was 13.30 % lower than that of cotton based on the normalized results. Fiber production was identified as the primary contributor to environmental loads, accounting for an average of 50.67 % of the total environmental burden in the cotton finished fabrics, and 57.75 % in the polyester, respectively. In monetary terms, cotton incurred a higher cost of € 9256.08 per ton, compared to € 4646.72 for polyester, indicating superior eco-efficiency. Additionally, BAT 24 (foam coating technology), BAT 17 (supercritical carbon dioxide dyeing), and BAT 29 (control of mineral oils and sizing agents) were selected as the top priority BATs for sustainable development. These findings highlight the importance of selecting fabrics based on both environmental sustainability and economic considerations. Moreover, the adoption of sustainable BATs can enhance both environmental and economic performance across the textile production value chain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 334-350"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144631477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A systematic literature review on circularity assessment indicators and frameworks in the built environment 建筑环境循环性评价指标和框架的系统文献综述

IF 9.6 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.004

Qiuxian Li , Dirk Saelens , Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin , Rengin Aslanoğlu , Joost van Hoof , Chiara Piccardo

A wide range of circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment have been developed in recent years to support the transition to a circular economy (CE). However, few studies have systematically reviewed the available circularity assessment methods beyond the building scale, and there is limited analysis of non-quantitative assessment methods. Therefore, this systematic literature review of 66 studies identifies and analyzes existing circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment across building, neighborhood, and city (and beyond) scales, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and key directions for future research. The analysis identifies 148 quantitative, 160 semi-quantitative, and 152 qualitative indicators, which are categorized based on their application in circularity assessment, either individually or as part of indicator sets in frameworks. The results show that existing indicators cover five key dimensions of circularity; however, the interrelationships between these dimensions remain unclear and are rarely addressed. Most indicators are applied at the building level, while larger spatial scales remain less developed. These findings highlight the complexity of the current state of the art, driven by the extensive number and fragmentation of existing indicators. Based on this, this review recommends future research directions to enhance circularity assessment methodologies, with an emphasis on refining existing methods, improving decision-support mechanisms, and moving toward standardization. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying critical research needs, this study serves as a starting point toward standardizing circularity assessment and thus supporting the adoption of CE principles in the built environment.

近年来，为支持向循环经济（CE）的过渡，已经制定了广泛的建筑环境循环评估指标和框架。然而，很少有研究系统地回顾了现有的建筑尺度以外的循环度评价方法，对非定量评价方法的分析也比较有限。因此，本文对66项研究进行了系统的文献综述，确定并分析了现有的建筑环境循环度评估指标和框架，涵盖了建筑、社区和城市（以及其他）尺度，为未来的研究提供了一个全面的概述。该分析确定了148个定量指标、160个半定量指标和152个定性指标，这些指标根据其在循环性评估中的应用进行了分类，可以单独使用，也可以作为框架中指标集的一部分。结果表明：现有指标涵盖了圆度的5个关键维度；然而，这些方面之间的相互关系仍然不清楚，很少得到解决。大多数指标应用于建筑层面，而更大的空间尺度仍然不太发达。这些调查结果突出表明，由于现有指标数量众多且支离破碎，目前的状况非常复杂。在此基础上，提出了完善循环评价方法、完善决策支持机制、向标准化方向发展的研究方向。通过综合当前的知识和确定关键的研究需求，本研究可以作为标准化循环性评估的起点，从而支持在建筑环境中采用CE原则。

{"title":"A systematic literature review on circularity assessment indicators and frameworks in the built environment","authors":"Qiuxian Li , Dirk Saelens , Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin , Rengin Aslanoğlu , Joost van Hoof , Chiara Piccardo","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A wide range of circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment have been developed in recent years to support the transition to a circular economy (CE). However, few studies have systematically reviewed the available circularity assessment methods beyond the building scale, and there is limited analysis of non-quantitative assessment methods. Therefore, this systematic literature review of 66 studies identifies and analyzes existing circularity assessment indicators and frameworks for the built environment across building, neighborhood, and city (and beyond) scales, providing a comprehensive overview of the state of the art and key directions for future research. The analysis identifies 148 quantitative, 160 semi-quantitative, and 152 qualitative indicators, which are categorized based on their application in circularity assessment, either individually or as part of indicator sets in frameworks. The results show that existing indicators cover five key dimensions of circularity; however, the interrelationships between these dimensions remain unclear and are rarely addressed. Most indicators are applied at the building level, while larger spatial scales remain less developed. These findings highlight the complexity of the current state of the art, driven by the extensive number and fragmentation of existing indicators. Based on this, this review recommends future research directions to enhance circularity assessment methodologies, with an emphasis on refining existing methods, improving decision-support mechanisms, and moving toward standardization. By synthesizing current knowledge and identifying critical research needs, this study serves as a starting point toward standardizing circularity assessment and thus supporting the adoption of CE principles in the built environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 412-431"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144723868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supply chain circularity composite index: Measuring the closed-loopedness of material flows 供应链循环度综合指数：衡量物料流的闭环性

IF 10.9 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.005

Jacob Kopeinig , Kevin Anton Kriechbaum , Julia Köberl , Helmut Zsifkovits

The transition from linear to circular economic models presents a critical challenge for sustainable industrial development, particularly in the context of complex, multi-tiered manufacturing supply chains. Despite the rise of circularity indicators, many existing metrics suffer from excessive data requirements, poor harmonization, and a lack of system-level applicability. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing the Supply Chain Circularity Composite Index, a novel performance metric designed to quantify the closed-loopedness of material flows using a Material Flow Analysis-based approach. The index aggregates three key sub-indicators - Material Efficiency, Secondary Material Usage, and Effectiveness of Recovery - into a composite score using the geometric mean to reflect proportional sensitivity and interdependency among supply chain actors. The index was developed through a systematic literature review of 59 foundational circularity metrics and validated through case studies in two manufacturing companies operating in distinct industrial sectors, the plastics and the gas engine manufacturing industry. Results demonstrate variation in circularity performance revealing distinct circularity profiles across the cases: The plastics manufacturer, with moderate values across all dimensions, achieved an overall circularity score of 0.35, whereas the gas engine firm showed the significantly higher level of secondary material usage (0.56) but was limited by a low recovery effectiveness of just 0.06, resulting in an overall circularity score of 0.30. These outcomes illustrate the index's diagnostic power to pinpoint specific strengths and deficiencies across the material loop. The index thus provides a scalable and operationally feasible indicator for companies aiming to improve material circularity across supply chain boundaries, and serves as a strategic instrument for aligning business practices with emerging regulatory and sustainability frameworks.

从线性经济模式向循环经济模式的转变对可持续工业发展提出了重大挑战，特别是在复杂的多层制造供应链背景下。尽管循环指标有所增加，但许多现有的度量标准存在数据需求过多、协调性差以及缺乏系统级适用性的问题。本文通过提出供应链循环综合指数来解决这些差距，这是一种新的绩效指标，旨在使用基于物料流分析的方法量化物料流的闭环性。该指数将三个关键子指标——材料效率、二次材料使用和回收有效性——汇总为一个综合分数，使用几何平均值来反映供应链参与者之间的比例敏感性和相互依赖性。该指数是通过对59个基本循环指标进行系统的文献回顾而制定的，并通过在塑料和燃气发动机制造业两家不同工业部门运营的制造公司的案例研究进行验证。结果显示了循环性能的变化，揭示了不同情况下不同的循环概况：塑料制造商在所有维度上都具有中等值，实现了0.35的总体循环得分，而燃气发动机公司显示出明显更高的二次材料使用水平（0.56），但受限于低回收效率仅为0.06，导致总体循环得分为0.30。这些结果说明了该指数在确定整个材料循环的特定优势和不足方面的诊断能力。因此，该指数为旨在改善跨供应链边界的材料循环的公司提供了一个可扩展和操作可行的指标，并作为将业务实践与新兴监管和可持续性框架保持一致的战略工具。

{"title":"Supply chain circularity composite index: Measuring the closed-loopedness of material flows","authors":"Jacob Kopeinig , Kevin Anton Kriechbaum , Julia Köberl , Helmut Zsifkovits","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition from linear to circular economic models presents a critical challenge for sustainable industrial development, particularly in the context of complex, multi-tiered manufacturing supply chains. Despite the rise of circularity indicators, many existing metrics suffer from excessive data requirements, poor harmonization, and a lack of system-level applicability. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing the Supply Chain Circularity Composite Index, a novel performance metric designed to quantify the closed-loopedness of material flows using a Material Flow Analysis-based approach. The index aggregates three key sub-indicators - Material Efficiency, Secondary Material Usage, and Effectiveness of Recovery - into a composite score using the geometric mean to reflect proportional sensitivity and interdependency among supply chain actors. The index was developed through a systematic literature review of 59 foundational circularity metrics and validated through case studies in two manufacturing companies operating in distinct industrial sectors, the plastics and the gas engine manufacturing industry. Results demonstrate variation in circularity performance revealing distinct circularity profiles across the cases: The plastics manufacturer, with moderate values across all dimensions, achieved an overall circularity score of 0.35, whereas the gas engine firm showed the significantly higher level of secondary material usage (0.56) but was limited by a low recovery effectiveness of just 0.06, resulting in an overall circularity score of 0.30. These outcomes illustrate the index's diagnostic power to pinpoint specific strengths and deficiencies across the material loop. The index thus provides a scalable and operationally feasible indicator for companies aiming to improve material circularity across supply chain boundaries, and serves as a strategic instrument for aligning business practices with emerging regulatory and sustainability frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 351-363"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144631478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Wind farms through the lens of sustainability and circularity: Integrating environmental, economic, and social dimensions 从可持续性和循环性的角度看风电场：整合环境、经济和社会维度

IF 10.9 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.003

Ana Arias , Maria Teresa Moreira , Gumersindo Feijoo

The development of a sustainable energy transition is one of the strategic objectives in Europe, and wind energy plays a key role, as its production capacity has increased significantly in recent decades. However, to verify that wind farm projects are indeed sustainable, it is necessary to apply appropriate methodologies to assess the three pillars of sustainable development: environmental, social and economic. In addition, a comparison with traditional energy resources of fossil origin is necessary, seeking to identify the benefits and challenges associated with these renewable energy alternatives, as well as the study of how wind farms adhere circular economy principles. The idea of this analysis is to avoid past mistakes, such as the depletion of essential resources, for example the depletion of rare elements, used for the construction of renewable energy facilities. It is in this framework that this comprehensive and critical review is developed, with the aim of providing information on the actual production of wind energy in the European context, its potential environmental benefits and effects, the socio-economic constraints and benefits that wind farm projects could bring, as well as the gaps and challenges identified in the value chain. It is hoped that this critical review can be considered as a guide for policy makers, researchers and stakeholders on the main constraints that could slow down wind energy technologies, on the environmental footprint of wind farms and its comparison with fossil energy, on the potentialities of wind projects to increase employment opportunities and economic growth, and on the main concerns of social communities.

可持续能源转型的发展是欧洲的战略目标之一，风能发挥着关键作用，近几十年来其生产能力显著增加。然而，为了验证风力发电场项目确实是可持续的，有必要采用适当的方法来评估可持续发展的三大支柱：环境、社会和经济。此外，有必要与化石来源的传统能源进行比较，寻求确定与这些可再生能源替代方案有关的好处和挑战，并研究风力发电场如何遵守循环经济原则。这种分析的想法是为了避免过去的错误，例如用于建设可再生能源设施的基本资源的枯竭，例如稀有元素的枯竭。正是在这一框架下，我们制定了这份全面而关键的评估报告，旨在提供有关欧洲风能实际生产、潜在环境效益和影响、风电场项目可能带来的社会经济制约和效益，以及价值链中确定的差距和挑战等方面的信息。希望这篇重要的评论可以被视为政策制定者、研究人员和利益相关者的指南，指导他们了解可能减缓风能技术的主要制约因素，了解风力发电场的环境足迹及其与化石能源的比较，了解风力项目增加就业机会和经济增长的潜力，以及社会社区的主要关切。

{"title":"Wind farms through the lens of sustainability and circularity: Integrating environmental, economic, and social dimensions","authors":"Ana Arias , Maria Teresa Moreira , Gumersindo Feijoo","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The development of a sustainable energy transition is one of the strategic objectives in Europe, and wind energy plays a key role, as its production capacity has increased significantly in recent decades. However, to verify that wind farm projects are indeed sustainable, it is necessary to apply appropriate methodologies to assess the three pillars of sustainable development: environmental, social and economic. In addition, a comparison with traditional energy resources of fossil origin is necessary, seeking to identify the benefits and challenges associated with these renewable energy alternatives, as well as the study of how wind farms adhere circular economy principles. The idea of this analysis is to avoid past mistakes, such as the depletion of essential resources, for example the depletion of rare elements, used for the construction of renewable energy facilities. It is in this framework that this comprehensive and critical review is developed, with the aim of providing information on the actual production of wind energy in the European context, its potential environmental benefits and effects, the socio-economic constraints and benefits that wind farm projects could bring, as well as the gaps and challenges identified in the value chain. It is hoped that this critical review can be considered as a guide for policy makers, researchers and stakeholders on the main constraints that could slow down wind energy technologies, on the environmental footprint of wind farms and its comparison with fossil energy, on the potentialities of wind projects to increase employment opportunities and economic growth, and on the main concerns of social communities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 277-292"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144596594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Social acceptance and economic impacts of biomethane: A resource for energy sustainability 生物甲烷的社会接受度和经济影响：一种能源可持续性资源

IF 10.9 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.021

Idiano D'Adamo , Francesco Ferella , Matteo Fuoco , Massimo Gastaldi

Biomethane represents a promising resource within the framework of the circular bioeconomy, enabling the substitution of fossil gas with a renewable alternative through the valorisation of substrates and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. The present study explored the social dimension of sustainability by means of an online survey and statistical analysis, based on 403 responses primarily from the municipality of Rome – a city facing pronounced waste management challenges. The findings indicate that public knowledge acts as a key enabler in supporting biomethane as a sustainable development initiative; however, public opinion remains neutral regarding the construction of such plants in close proximity to residential areas. The perceived benefits include improved waste management and enhanced energy and material autonomy. Respondents reported a willingness to pay an 11.2 % premium for biomethane, while expecting an 18.7 % reduction in waste taxation. The resulting benefits could be reinvested in public infrastructure or directed towards supporting economically vulnerable families. To advance this agenda, integrated policies are essential to foster both technological innovation and social inclusion. Biomethane thus emerges as a strategic solution aligned with Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 12.

在循环生物经济框架内，生物甲烷是一种很有前途的资源，通过基材和城市固体废物的有机部分的增值，可以用可再生替代品替代化石气体。本研究通过在线调查和统计分析，主要基于罗马市的403份答复，探讨了可持续性的社会层面。罗马市面临着明显的废物管理挑战。研究结果表明，公众知识是支持生物甲烷作为可持续发展举措的关键推动因素；然而，公众舆论对在居民区附近建造这类工厂持中立态度。可预见的好处包括改善废物管理，增强能源和材料的自主性。受访者表示愿意为生物甲烷支付11.2%的溢价，同时预计废物税将减少18.7%。由此产生的收益可以再投资于公共基础设施或用于支持经济上脆弱的家庭。为了推进这一议程，综合政策对于促进技术创新和社会包容至关重要。因此，生物甲烷成为符合可持续发展目标7和12的战略解决方案。

{"title":"Social acceptance and economic impacts of biomethane: A resource for energy sustainability","authors":"Idiano D'Adamo , Francesco Ferella , Matteo Fuoco , Massimo Gastaldi","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomethane represents a promising resource within the framework of the circular bioeconomy, enabling the substitution of fossil gas with a renewable alternative through the valorisation of substrates and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. The present study explored the social dimension of sustainability by means of an online survey and statistical analysis, based on 403 responses primarily from the municipality of Rome – a city facing pronounced waste management challenges. The findings indicate that public knowledge acts as a key enabler in supporting biomethane as a sustainable development initiative; however, public opinion remains neutral regarding the construction of such plants in close proximity to residential areas. The perceived benefits include improved waste management and enhanced energy and material autonomy. Respondents reported a willingness to pay an 11.2 % premium for biomethane, while expecting an 18.7 % reduction in waste taxation. The resulting benefits could be reinvested in public infrastructure or directed towards supporting economically vulnerable families. To advance this agenda, integrated policies are essential to foster both technological innovation and social inclusion. Biomethane thus emerges as a strategic solution aligned with Sustainable Development Goals 7 and 12.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 221-236"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144570212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Border regulation and greenhouse gas emissions from EU-UK food trade 欧盟与英国食品贸易的边境管制和温室气体排放

IF 10.9 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.020

Elena Benedetti , Luca Panzone , Livia Cabernard , John Wildman , Chris Seal

Recent years have seen an increase in global trade. Despite well-known welfare benefits, trade in goods is also an important contributor of greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental regulation of trade is complex, because environmental domestic regulation can drive the relocation of these emissions abroad (carbon leakage); while environmental import restrictions can increase domestic greenhouse gas emissions by stimulating the production of high‑carbon goods (inverse leakage). In this article, we micro-simulate the impact at the border of a carbon tariff on food trade, modelling UK food imports from the European Union using a gravity model. In this exercise, we implement a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, which charges for the difference in carbon emissions of a good between importer and exporter. Yearly country-level greenhouse gas emissions are calculated using a top-down life-cycle assessment approach known as environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output analysis. Results show that a British food Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism would cut annual emissions imported from the European Union by around 25 % through trade reallocation. The findings indicate that carbon border regulation is an important tool for promoting more sustainable food systems.

近年来，全球贸易有所增长。除了众所周知的福利好处，货物贸易也是温室气体排放的重要贡献者。贸易的环境监管是复杂的，因为国内环境监管可能会推动这些排放转移到国外（碳泄漏）；而环境进口限制可以通过刺激高碳产品的生产而增加国内温室气体排放（反向泄漏）。在这篇文章中，我们微观模拟了碳关税对食品贸易的影响，用重力模型模拟了英国从欧盟进口的食品。在这项工作中，我们实施了碳边界调整机制，该机制根据进口国和出口国之间的碳排放差异收费。每年国家级温室气体排放量的计算采用一种称为环境扩展多区域投入产出分析的自上而下的生命周期评估方法。结果表明，通过贸易再分配，英国食品碳边界调整机制将使从欧盟进口的年排放量减少约25%。研究结果表明，碳边界监管是促进更可持续粮食系统的重要工具。

{"title":"Border regulation and greenhouse gas emissions from EU-UK food trade","authors":"Elena Benedetti , Luca Panzone , Livia Cabernard , John Wildman , Chris Seal","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent years have seen an increase in global trade. Despite well-known welfare benefits, trade in goods is also an important contributor of greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental regulation of trade is complex, because environmental domestic regulation can drive the relocation of these emissions abroad (carbon leakage); while environmental import restrictions can increase domestic greenhouse gas emissions by stimulating the production of high‑carbon goods (inverse leakage). In this article, we micro-simulate the impact at the border of a carbon tariff on food trade, modelling UK food imports from the European Union using a gravity model. In this exercise, we implement a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, which charges for the difference in carbon emissions of a good between importer and exporter. Yearly country-level greenhouse gas emissions are calculated using a top-down life-cycle assessment approach known as environmentally-extended multi-regional input-output analysis. Results show that a British food Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism would cut annual emissions imported from the European Union by around 25 % through trade reallocation. The findings indicate that carbon border regulation is an important tool for promoting more sustainable food systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 251-266"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144580707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Navigating sustainability transitions: A science for policy approach 引导可持续性转型：政策方法的科学

IF 10.9 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Pub Date : 2025-07-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.001

Heinz Schandl , Andrea Walton , Sandra Oliver , Guy Barnett , Stuart Whitten

The world faces an unprecedented convergence of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, collectively referred to as the Triple Planetary Crisis. These interlinked challenges, compounded by rising inequality and weakened governance, threaten progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and demand a transformative response. This review article adopts an integrative approach grounded in ecological economics, social-ecological systems theory, and sustainability science to examine the dynamic interactions between economic growth, resource use, environmental degradation, and social well-being. The findings underscore that technological innovation and efficiency improvements alone are insufficient to achieve sustainable production and consumption. Instead, the transition requires systemic change, including shifts in production and consumption patterns, institutional reform, and redefined notions of prosperity. It identifies key steps in the co-production of the transition pathway and five key shifts in provision systems that, taken together, can achieve science-based policy reform through interdisciplinary collaboration, co-production of knowledge, and adaptive governance, thereby navigating complexity and uncertainty in policymaking. By focusing on these critical aspects, this research provides a comprehensive framework for navigating the transition to a sustainable future within planetary boundaries.

世界面临着前所未有的气候变化、生物多样性丧失和污染的融合，统称为“三重地球危机”。这些相互关联的挑战，加上不平等加剧和治理弱化，威胁着实现可持续发展目标的进展，需要采取变革性的应对措施。本文采用基于生态经济学、社会生态系统理论和可持续性科学的综合方法来考察经济增长、资源利用、环境退化和社会福祉之间的动态相互作用。调查结果强调，仅靠技术革新和提高效率不足以实现可持续的生产和消费。相反，转型需要系统性变革，包括生产和消费模式的转变、制度改革和重新定义繁荣的概念。报告确定了共同创造转型路径的关键步骤，以及提供系统的五个关键转变，这些转变加在一起，可以通过跨学科合作、知识共同创造和适应性治理实现基于科学的政策改革，从而应对政策制定中的复杂性和不确定性。通过关注这些关键方面，本研究为在地球边界内导航向可持续未来的过渡提供了一个全面的框架。

{"title":"Navigating sustainability transitions: A science for policy approach","authors":"Heinz Schandl , Andrea Walton , Sandra Oliver , Guy Barnett , Stuart Whitten","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The world faces an unprecedented convergence of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution, collectively referred to as the Triple Planetary Crisis. These interlinked challenges, compounded by rising inequality and weakened governance, threaten progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and demand a transformative response. This review article adopts an integrative approach grounded in ecological economics, social-ecological systems theory, and sustainability science to examine the dynamic interactions between economic growth, resource use, environmental degradation, and social well-being. The findings underscore that technological innovation and efficiency improvements alone are insufficient to achieve sustainable production and consumption. Instead, the transition requires systemic change, including shifts in production and consumption patterns, institutional reform, and redefined notions of prosperity. It identifies key steps in the co-production of the transition pathway and five key shifts in provision systems that, taken together, can achieve science-based policy reform through interdisciplinary collaboration, co-production of knowledge, and adaptive governance, thereby navigating complexity and uncertainty in policymaking. By focusing on these critical aspects, this research provides a comprehensive framework for navigating the transition to a sustainable future within planetary boundaries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 385-395"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144663477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0