Pub Date : 2025-08-10DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.005
Thi Huyen Trang Dam, Philipp Grundmann, Richard Orozco, Naser Reyhani
Circular economy (CE) models have potential to advance sustainability in biomass-based value chains, but implementation on marginal lands is constrained by governance fragmentation, limited financing, and diverging stakeholder priorities. Using a mixed-methods approach—including stakeholder surveys, thematic coding, and concept mapping—this study examines governance expectations across seven international case contexts in Europe, South Africa, and Argentina. The results reveal pronounced differences across groups: businesses and investors prioritize infrastructure, financing mechanisms, and market stability; farmers emphasize land-use flexibility, compensation schemes, and long-term support; policymakers and environmental and conservation organizations focus on regulatory coherence, biodiversity protection, and inclusive governance; while research and innovation actors call for strengthened coordination, knowledge exchange, and locally adapted monitoring systems. In Global South cases, social equity issues—especially related to land access, participation, and benefit sharing—emerged as critical concerns. Across groups and countries, shared expectations for biobased products centered on climate and biodiversity benefits, affordability, traceability, and alignment with local needs and CE principles. Concept mapping illustrates interlinkages between stakeholder-defined priorities, governance gaps, and technical constraints, offering insight into underlying sustainability trade-offs. The findings highlight stakeholder governance as a central enabler of CE transitions, emphasizing the need for multi-level, participatory coordination, stable financial support, and cross-sectoral alignment. These insights contribute to context-sensitive strategies for circular bioeconomy development on marginal lands and support progress toward SDG 12.5, while reinforcing synergies with SDGs 13 and 15 on climate and biodiversity goals.
{"title":"Stakeholder-driven circular economy on marginal lands: Governance and sustainability trade-offs in biomass value chains","authors":"Thi Huyen Trang Dam, Philipp Grundmann, Richard Orozco, Naser Reyhani","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circular economy (CE) models have potential to advance sustainability in biomass-based value chains, but implementation on marginal lands is constrained by governance fragmentation, limited financing, and diverging stakeholder priorities. Using a mixed-methods approach—including stakeholder surveys, thematic coding, and concept mapping—this study examines governance expectations across seven international case contexts in Europe, South Africa, and Argentina. The results reveal pronounced differences across groups: businesses and investors prioritize infrastructure, financing mechanisms, and market stability; farmers emphasize land-use flexibility, compensation schemes, and long-term support; policymakers and environmental and conservation organizations focus on regulatory coherence, biodiversity protection, and inclusive governance; while research and innovation actors call for strengthened coordination, knowledge exchange, and locally adapted monitoring systems. In Global South cases, social equity issues—especially related to land access, participation, and benefit sharing—emerged as critical concerns. Across groups and countries, shared expectations for biobased products centered on climate and biodiversity benefits, affordability, traceability, and alignment with local needs and CE principles. Concept mapping illustrates interlinkages between stakeholder-defined priorities, governance gaps, and technical constraints, offering insight into underlying sustainability trade-offs. The findings highlight stakeholder governance as a central enabler of CE transitions, emphasizing the need for multi-level, participatory coordination, stable financial support, and cross-sectoral alignment. These insights contribute to context-sensitive strategies for circular bioeconomy development on marginal lands and support progress toward SDG 12.5, while reinforcing synergies with SDGs 13 and 15 on climate and biodiversity goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 82-98"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144852407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As electric vehicle (EV) adoption accelerates, understanding the environmental impacts of EV batteries—particularly at their end-of-life (EOL)—is essential. This study presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing two EOL strategies: (1) immediate recycling and (2) repurposing for an additional ten years prior to recycling. The analysis covers the entire battery life cycle, using real-world load profiles from a Thai fruit export community and projected electricity mixes under three national decarbonization pathways. Environmental performance is assessed across four impact categories: global warming potential, freshwater ecotoxicity, human non-carcinogenic toxicity, and mineral resource scarcity. Results highlight that the battery production and primary use phases contribute most to environmental impacts. However, second-life use can significantly offset emissions, especially in carbon-intensive grid scenarios. In the second-use phase, sensitivity analysis showed that variations in capacity degradation and usable cell rates did not affect the total energy savings or environmental outcomes when the lost capacity was compensated by additional repurposed batteries. Among all scenarios, repurposing batteries before recycling under “30% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030” policy achieved the highest overall sustainability score, offering a balanced reduction across all impact categories. Expert-weighted impact factors further enhance the robustness of the assessment. This study offers actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, supporting circular economy strategies and reinforcing the role of second-life applications in Thailand's low-carbon transition.
{"title":"Environmental trade-offs of EV battery end-of-life options in Thailand: A life cycle assessment with sensitivity to electricity mix and battery degradation","authors":"Sakraan Sitcharangsie , Suwit Paengkanya , Seksan Papong","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As electric vehicle (EV) adoption accelerates, understanding the environmental impacts of EV batteries—particularly at their end-of-life (EOL)—is essential. This study presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) comparing two EOL strategies: (1) immediate recycling and (2) repurposing for an additional ten years prior to recycling. The analysis covers the entire battery life cycle, using real-world load profiles from a Thai fruit export community and projected electricity mixes under three national decarbonization pathways. Environmental performance is assessed across four impact categories: global warming potential, freshwater ecotoxicity, human non-carcinogenic toxicity, and mineral resource scarcity. Results highlight that the battery production and primary use phases contribute most to environmental impacts. However, second-life use can significantly offset emissions, especially in carbon-intensive grid scenarios. In the second-use phase, sensitivity analysis showed that variations in capacity degradation and usable cell rates did not affect the total energy savings or environmental outcomes when the lost capacity was compensated by additional repurposed batteries. Among all scenarios, repurposing batteries before recycling under “30% reduction in carbon intensity by 2030” policy achieved the highest overall sustainability score, offering a balanced reduction across all impact categories. Expert-weighted impact factors further enhance the robustness of the assessment. This study offers actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, supporting circular economy strategies and reinforcing the role of second-life applications in Thailand's low-carbon transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 63-81"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144842502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.002
Heather Margaret Logan , Valentina Rossi , Kamilla Kastrup Hansen , Maggie Ziggie Søndergaard , Anders Damgaard
There is an urgent need to reduce the production and consumption of garments to curb the environmental emissions from the waste generated after their lifecycles. Nonetheless, even if drastic steps are taken today to reduce the production of textiles, the textiles already in circulation eventually need to be disposed of or recycled. To capture these garments and increase the quantity of textile available for recycling, the European Union (EU) has mandated the separate collection of the textile fraction across member states from 2025. However, collecting textiles for recycling does not guarantee that the collected textiles are recyclable. This study explores the recyclability of textiles by analysing the anatomy of textiles (linings, disruptors, adornments, and fibre blends) in Denmark and applies these findings to forecast the material available to different recycling routes in 2025. This study finds that in Denmark, after initial collection and sorting, textile complexity will likely result in the incineration of 36 % of textiles sent to recycling streams, 53 % will require disruptor removal, and 11 % will be available to different recycling routes. When the recycling capacity for high-quality recycling is considered, only a minor part (<2 %) of textiles in the Danish market can result in high-quality fibre-to-fibre recycling. These results emphasize the importance of considering textile anatomy both when designing textiles and determining recycling pathways. Moreover, our findings underscore that the Circular Economy (CE) transition cannot rely on recycling alone; instead, it must invest in avoidance and reuse approaches in addition to improved sorting and pretreatment facilities within Europe to best utilize the textiles currently in circulation.
{"title":"Assessing the circularity potential of textile flows for future markets in Denmark: A study of textile anatomy","authors":"Heather Margaret Logan , Valentina Rossi , Kamilla Kastrup Hansen , Maggie Ziggie Søndergaard , Anders Damgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is an urgent need to reduce the production and consumption of garments to curb the environmental emissions from the waste generated after their lifecycles. Nonetheless, even if drastic steps are taken today to reduce the production of textiles, the textiles already in circulation eventually need to be disposed of or recycled. To capture these garments and increase the quantity of textile available for recycling, the European Union (EU) has mandated the separate collection of the textile fraction across member states from 2025. However, collecting textiles for recycling does not guarantee that the collected textiles are recyclable. This study explores the recyclability of textiles by analysing the anatomy of textiles (linings, disruptors, adornments, and fibre blends) in Denmark and applies these findings to forecast the material available to different recycling routes in 2025. This study finds that in Denmark, after initial collection and sorting, textile complexity will likely result in the incineration of 36 % of textiles sent to recycling streams, 53 % will require disruptor removal, and 11 % will be available to different recycling routes. When the recycling capacity for high-quality recycling is considered, only a minor part (<2 %) of textiles in the Danish market can result in high-quality fibre-to-fibre recycling. These results emphasize the importance of considering textile anatomy both when designing textiles and determining recycling pathways. Moreover, our findings underscore that the Circular Economy (CE) transition cannot rely on recycling alone; instead, it must invest in avoidance and reuse approaches in addition to improved sorting and pretreatment facilities within Europe to best utilize the textiles currently in circulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 127-142"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144865175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study applied Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental performance of a conventional Ceramic Roof (CR) and a modular Green Roof (GR). As a novel contribution, the GR system was designed using Pereskia aculeata, a resilient, edible, and underutilized plant species, and included the analysis of rainwater retention impacts during the roof's use phase. The methodology was structured in three stages: (1) comparison between CR and GR systems, considering construction and the roof's first year of use; (2) sensitivity analysis of alternative materials for GR components, complemented by uncertainty analysis; and (3) a 30-years projection of use-phase impacts. Primary data were obtained from GR experimental prototypes monitored over one year, including irrigation volumes, plant development, and rainwater retention from 50 rainfall events. Secondary data were modeled using the ecoinvent database and literature sources. In the first stage, GR outperformed CR in 11 of 14 impact categories, with total normalized impacts 13 % lower. In CR, 80 % of impacts were from ceramic tile production, while in GR, polymer components were most impactful, polypropylene accounted for 82 % of Fossil Depletion and polyester for 95 % of Ozone Depletion. Sensitivity analysis showed that substituting the module and filter layers' materials with alternative polymers in GR reduced Marine and Freshwater Ecotoxicity by over 70 %. The optimized GR scenario achieved 71 % lower normalized impacts than CR and performed better in 13 of 14 categories. The 30-years projection reinforced the GR's superior performance over time. In conclusion, GR demonstrated substantial environmental advantages over CR. Additionally, GR adds value through food production, making it a promising strategy for promoting urban agriculture. Further studies on cost, end-of-life impacts, and species selection are needed to support broader adoption.
{"title":"Sustainable construction based on green roofs designed to retain rainwater and provide food: An LCA compared to conventional roofs","authors":"Florence Rezende Leite , Maria Lúcia Pereira Antunes , Diogo Aparecido Lopes Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study applied Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to compare the environmental performance of a conventional Ceramic Roof (CR) and a modular Green Roof (GR). As a novel contribution, the GR system was designed using <em>Pereskia aculeata</em>, a resilient, edible, and underutilized plant species, and included the analysis of rainwater retention impacts during the roof's use phase. The methodology was structured in three stages: (1) comparison between CR and GR systems, considering construction and the roof's first year of use; (2) sensitivity analysis of alternative materials for GR components, complemented by uncertainty analysis; and (3) a 30-years projection of use-phase impacts. Primary data were obtained from GR experimental prototypes monitored over one year, including irrigation volumes, plant development, and rainwater retention from 50 rainfall events. Secondary data were modeled using the ecoinvent database and literature sources. In the first stage, GR outperformed CR in 11 of 14 impact categories, with total normalized impacts 13 % lower. In CR, 80 % of impacts were from ceramic tile production, while in GR, polymer components were most impactful, polypropylene accounted for 82 % of Fossil Depletion and polyester for 95 % of Ozone Depletion. Sensitivity analysis showed that substituting the module and filter layers' materials with alternative polymers in GR reduced Marine and Freshwater Ecotoxicity by over 70 %. The optimized GR scenario achieved 71 % lower normalized impacts than CR and performed better in 13 of 14 categories. The 30-years projection reinforced the GR's superior performance over time. In conclusion, GR demonstrated substantial environmental advantages over CR. Additionally, GR adds value through food production, making it a promising strategy for promoting urban agriculture. Further studies on cost, end-of-life impacts, and species selection are needed to support broader adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144780454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.012
Miranda Braga Gomes Nogueira, Jeanette Simpson , Adam Christopher Snow , Fiona Charnley , Begüm Yontar Avcı, Kevin Brown , Tanvir Ahmed
This research explores challenges and critical factors in implementing circular economy (CE) initiatives, particularly in business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) contexts, through the analysis of previous failures. There is limited literature on CE implementation failure mechanisms and how learning from them can inform business operations.
A detailed analysis of 145 B2B and B2C primary and secondary case studies, combine insights from subject matter experts, examines outcomes against original objectives. Using a systems thinking framework, the research investigates the root causes of CE failures and whether such an approach might assist to prevent future breakdowns. This research positions itself by considering end-to-end circularity, while integrating environmental (e.g. greenhouse gas emissions), social, and systemic sustainability dimensions.
Findings reveal that failures often result from neglecting wider system impacts, including cost implications and waste management challenges. The complexity of CE implementation is underscored, supporting a systems approach that aligns environmental protection, social equity, economic feasibility, and consumer engagement. The study also highlights a clear gap in the literature on CE failure, reinforcing the need for more structure and systemic analysis. Actionable insights are offered to inform strategic planning, risk management, policy development, and investment in more resilient CE adoption
{"title":"Circular economy and the Titanic effect: Analysis of 145 case studies","authors":"Miranda Braga Gomes Nogueira, Jeanette Simpson , Adam Christopher Snow , Fiona Charnley , Begüm Yontar Avcı, Kevin Brown , Tanvir Ahmed","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research explores challenges and critical factors in implementing circular economy (CE) initiatives, particularly in business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) contexts, through the analysis of previous failures. There is limited literature on CE implementation failure mechanisms and how learning from them can inform business operations.</div><div>A detailed analysis of 145 B2B and B2C primary and secondary case studies, combine insights from subject matter experts, examines outcomes against original objectives. Using a systems thinking framework, the research investigates the root causes of CE failures and whether such an approach might assist to prevent future breakdowns. This research positions itself by considering end-to-end circularity, while integrating environmental (e.g. greenhouse gas emissions), social, and systemic sustainability dimensions.</div><div>Findings reveal that failures often result from neglecting wider system impacts, including cost implications and waste management challenges. The complexity of CE implementation is underscored, supporting a systems approach that aligns environmental protection, social equity, economic feasibility, and consumer engagement. The study also highlights a clear gap in the literature on CE failure, reinforcing the need for more structure and systemic analysis. Actionable insights are offered to inform strategic planning, risk management, policy development, and investment in more resilient CE adoption</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 325-338"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145003561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Households produce more food waste than the rest of the supply chain combined in most countries. Identifying which households contribute most to food waste is important for designing and implementing effective interventions to reduce food waste. However, previous findings on the impact of socio-demographic characteristics and food management behaviours on household food waste are inconsistent and often rely on self-reported food waste data. In this study, we examined the association of socio-demographics and food management behaviours with directly measured food waste in 1783 UK households using waste compositional analysis. Our findings indicate that household size, age, and education significantly influence food waste levels, with individuals holding a university degree wasting less food, contrary to previous studies that analysed self-reported food waste levels. Additionally, the behaviours of purchasing the right amount of food, reusing leftovers, and defrosting items from the freezer are found to mediate the relationship between age and food waste. While purchasing the right amount of food and reusing leftovers are associated with lower food waste, households better at defrosting tend to waste more food, an intriguing and previously unreported finding. Our results suggest that future behavioural interventions should focus on these significant socio-demographic factors and food management behaviours to reduce household food waste.
{"title":"Is that the way the cookie crumbles? Variation in household food waste by socio-demographics and food management behaviours","authors":"Gülbanu Kaptan , Tom Quested , Chuyao Kuang , Marcel Torode","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Households produce more food waste than the rest of the supply chain combined in most countries. Identifying which households contribute most to food waste is important for designing and implementing effective interventions to reduce food waste. However, previous findings on the impact of socio-demographic characteristics and food management behaviours on household food waste are inconsistent and often rely on <em>self-reported</em> food waste data. In this study, we examined the association of socio-demographics and food management behaviours with directly measured food waste in 1783 UK households using waste compositional analysis. Our findings indicate that household size, age, and education significantly influence food waste levels, with individuals holding a university degree wasting less food, contrary to previous studies that analysed self-reported food waste levels. Additionally, the behaviours of purchasing the right amount of food, reusing leftovers, and defrosting items from the freezer are found to mediate the relationship between age and food waste. While purchasing the right amount of food and reusing leftovers are associated with lower food waste, households better at defrosting tend to waste more food, an intriguing and previously unreported finding. Our results suggest that future behavioural interventions should focus on these significant socio-demographic factors and food management behaviours to reduce household food waste.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144829883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.006
Aurore Guillaume , Lise Appels , Vladimír Kočí , Jan Aerts , Annemie Geeraerd
Shifting one's diet towards more plant-based products is seen as one of the most efficient ways to mitigate one's environmental footprint. Yet, associated market adjustments between global demand and supply are rarely considered in environmental assessments and could counterbalance expected environmental benefits. In this context, we used an agro-economic model to predict global production changes following a demand shift towards EAT-Lancet guidelines for red meat and legume intake for the year 2030. We modelled four scenarios which apply to diverse regions, namely, the European Union (EU), EU and China, 40 % of the largest red meat eaters and the whole world. The environmental impact of these subsequent changes was quantified using consequential Life Cycle Assessment. Results show that significant environmental benefits could be achieved already when 40 % of the largest red meat-eating population shifts its diet. For greenhouse gas emissions, it translates into 1.02 GtCO2 eq and 1.27 GtCO2 eq saved in the 40 % and global diet shift scenarios, respectively. This latter is equivalent to the annual savings needed to reach net zero in 2050 for the Paris Agreement. Most of the local environmental benefits are linked to the regional specialisation of agricultural production. For example, there would be lower acidification in Asia due to the decrease in livestock production and lower aquatic eutrophication and ecotoxicity in the Americas due to the decrease in feed production. To reach such diet shifts and associated environmental benefits, context-specific solutions should be defined considering cultural and, global and regional physical constraints.
{"title":"Including the agro-economic effects of diet shifts into environmental assessments: Implications for the world's largest red meat eaters","authors":"Aurore Guillaume , Lise Appels , Vladimír Kočí , Jan Aerts , Annemie Geeraerd","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shifting one's diet towards more plant-based products is seen as one of the most efficient ways to mitigate one's environmental footprint. Yet, associated market adjustments between global demand and supply are rarely considered in environmental assessments and could counterbalance expected environmental benefits. In this context, we used an agro-economic model to predict global production changes following a demand shift towards EAT-Lancet guidelines for red meat and legume intake for the year 2030. We modelled four scenarios which apply to diverse regions, namely, the European Union (EU), EU and China, 40 % of the largest red meat eaters and the whole world. The environmental impact of these subsequent changes was quantified using consequential Life Cycle Assessment. Results show that significant environmental benefits could be achieved already when 40 % of the largest red meat-eating population shifts its diet. For greenhouse gas emissions, it translates into 1.02 GtCO<sub>2</sub> eq and 1.27 GtCO<sub>2</sub> eq saved in the 40 % and global diet shift scenarios, respectively. This latter is equivalent to the annual savings needed to reach net zero in 2050 for the Paris Agreement. Most of the local environmental benefits are linked to the regional specialisation of agricultural production. For example, there would be lower acidification in Asia due to the decrease in livestock production and lower aquatic eutrophication and ecotoxicity in the Americas due to the decrease in feed production. To reach such diet shifts and associated environmental benefits, context-specific solutions should be defined considering cultural and, global and regional physical constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 27-38"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144828212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-24DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.009
Prince Agyemang , Ebenezer M. Kwofie , Ludovic Lahaye , Melissa Otis , Emilie Fontaine , Victoria Asselstine , Aubin Payne , Greg Thoma
Over the last decade, policymakers and dairy producers worldwide have faced the challenge of reducing the environmental impact of dairy production while continuing to meet societal needs for high-quality and nutritious protein sources. Given this, the objective of the present study was to assess the net environmental impact of adopting different nutrition strategies with and without supplementing rumen-protected B vitamins (RPBV, B vitamins that are microencapsulated to bypass rumen degradation in cows and be absorbed in the small intestines) in dairy milk production. Seven representative regional dairy production systems across the United States, Canada, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Australia, and France were investigated, utilizing a total mixed ration (TMR) feeding program supplemented with 3 g of RPBV. The estimated climate change impact scores for all control production scenarios ranged from 1.08 to 1.65 kg CO2-eq/kg fat protein-corrected milk (FPCM). However, the impact of climate change per kg of FPCM decreased by 5.6–18.0 % when RPBV was supplemented on top of the TMR feeding program. The highest and lowest climate change impact reductions were observed for the RPBV production scenarios in Mexico and Colombia, where the impacts decreased from 1.65 to 1.36 kg CO2-eq/FPCM and from 1.49 to 1.41 kg CO2-eq, respectively. Additionally, the impacts of agricultural land use, water consumption, and acidification, as well as eutrophication potential, were reduced by 3.0–16.3 % (with an average reduction of 7.4 % across all scenarios) when the TMR feeding programs were supplemented with 3 g of RPBV. The observed impact reduction could be attributed to improvements in milk production, which varied across different regions, with milk yields ranging from 3.3 % to 19.4 % above those of the control production scenario. Additionally, there were reductions in enteric methane (up to 2.4 %) and nitrogen emissions (up to 10 %). In dairy cows, RPBV acts as an enzyme co-factor at the cellular level by improving the efficiency of key pathways involved in energy, fat, and protein metabolism, which consequently increases milk yield and feed efficiency. The manufacturing and transportation of RPBV to the seven regional destinations examined in the current study had a minimal impact on the total environmental footprint of dairy production systems. The null hypothesis was rejected, indicating significant differences in results, as the p-value for all impacts and pairs (control and RPBV scenarios per 500 Monte Carlo runs) was less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant. Overall, supplementation with RPBV constitutes a valuable nutritional strategy to support ongoing efforts and innovations in driving sustainable dairy production.
在过去十年中,世界各地的决策者和乳制品生产商面临着减少乳制品生产对环境影响的挑战,同时继续满足社会对高质量和营养蛋白质来源的需求。鉴于此,本研究的目的是评估在奶牛产奶过程中,采用不同营养策略添加和不添加瘤胃保护B族维生素(RPBV,一种微胶囊化的B族维生素,可绕过奶牛瘤胃降解并被小肠吸收)对环境的净影响。研究人员对美国、加拿大、墨西哥、智利、哥伦比亚、澳大利亚和法国七个具有代表性的区域乳制品生产系统进行了调查,采用了全混合日粮(TMR)饲喂方案,并添加了3g RPBV。所有控制生产情景的估计气候变化影响得分范围为1.08至1.65千克二氧化碳当量/千克脂肪蛋白校正奶(FPCM)。然而,在TMR饲养计划的基础上添加RPBV,每公斤FPCM对气候变化的影响降低了5.6 - 18.0%。在RPBV生产情景下,墨西哥和哥伦比亚的气候变化影响减少幅度最大和最低,其影响分别从1.65 kg co2当量/FPCM和1.49 kg co2当量降至1.41 kg co2当量。此外,当TMR喂养方案中添加3g RPBV时,农业用地利用、用水量、酸化以及富营养化潜力的影响降低了3.0 - 16.3%(在所有情景中平均降低了7.4%)。观察到的影响减少可归因于牛奶产量的提高,这在不同地区有所不同,牛奶产量比控制生产情景高出3.3%至19.4%。此外,肠道甲烷(最多减少2.4%)和氮排放(最多减少10%)也有所减少。在奶牛中,RPBV在细胞水平上作为一种酶辅助因子,通过提高能量、脂肪和蛋白质代谢的关键途径的效率,从而提高产奶量和饲料效率。在目前的研究中,RPBV的制造和运输到七个区域目的地对乳制品生产系统的总环境足迹影响最小。原假设被拒绝,表明结果存在显著差异,因为所有影响和对(每500个蒙特卡罗运行的对照和RPBV场景)的p值小于0.05,这被认为具有统计学意义。总的来说,补充RPBV是一种有价值的营养战略,可以支持推动可持续乳制品生产的持续努力和创新。
{"title":"Global analysis of nutritional strategies to mitigate the environmental impacts of dairy production: the case of supplementing diets with microencapsulated B vitamins","authors":"Prince Agyemang , Ebenezer M. Kwofie , Ludovic Lahaye , Melissa Otis , Emilie Fontaine , Victoria Asselstine , Aubin Payne , Greg Thoma","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the last decade, policymakers and dairy producers worldwide have faced the challenge of reducing the environmental impact of dairy production while continuing to meet societal needs for high-quality and nutritious protein sources. Given this, the objective of the present study was to assess the net environmental impact of adopting different nutrition strategies with and without supplementing rumen-protected B vitamins (RPBV, B vitamins that are microencapsulated to bypass rumen degradation in cows and be absorbed in the small intestines) in dairy milk production. Seven representative regional dairy production systems across the United States, Canada, Mexico, Chile, Colombia, Australia, and France were investigated, utilizing a total mixed ration (TMR) feeding program supplemented with 3 g of RPBV. The estimated climate change impact scores for all control production scenarios ranged from 1.08 to 1.65 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kg fat protein-corrected milk (FPCM). However, the impact of climate change per kg of FPCM decreased by 5.6–18.0 % when RPBV was supplemented on top of the TMR feeding program. The highest and lowest climate change impact reductions were observed for the RPBV production scenarios in Mexico and Colombia, where the impacts decreased from 1.65 to 1.36 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/FPCM and from 1.49 to 1.41 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, respectively. Additionally, the impacts of agricultural land use, water consumption, and acidification, as well as eutrophication potential, were reduced by 3.0–16.3 % (with an average reduction of 7.4 % across all scenarios) when the TMR feeding programs were supplemented with 3 g of RPBV. The observed impact reduction could be attributed to improvements in milk production, which varied across different regions, with milk yields ranging from 3.3 % to 19.4 % above those of the control production scenario. Additionally, there were reductions in enteric methane (up to 2.4 %) and nitrogen emissions (up to 10 %). In dairy cows, RPBV acts as an enzyme co-factor at the cellular level by improving the efficiency of key pathways involved in energy, fat, and protein metabolism, which consequently increases milk yield and feed efficiency. The manufacturing and transportation of RPBV to the seven regional destinations examined in the current study had a minimal impact on the total environmental footprint of dairy production systems. The null hypothesis was rejected, indicating significant differences in results, as the p-value for all impacts and pairs (control and RPBV scenarios per 500 Monte Carlo runs) was less than 0.05, which is considered statistically significant. Overall, supplementation with RPBV constitutes a valuable nutritional strategy to support ongoing efforts and innovations in driving sustainable dairy production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 339-358"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145010443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-24DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.008
Shwe Yie Lin , Nicholas M. Holden , Romanee Thongdara , Thapat Silalertruksa , Shabbir H. Gheewala , Trakarn Prapaspongsa
Sugarcane biorefineries convert sugarcane waste into bioproducts, requiring assessment for environmentally viable processing. This study compared the life cycle environmental impacts, environmental damage costs, and circularity of sugarcane biorefinery scenarios: a base case with pre-harvest cane trash burning and sugar and ethanol production; a modified one with improved energy efficiency; and three bioproduct scenarios producing bagasse-based biobutanol or biochar for bioenergy scenario, lactic or acetic acid for biochemicals, and cane trash-derived cellulose nanofibers or soil conditioner for biomaterials. Bioproduct scenarios assumed green cane harvesting. Life cycle assessment followed a cradle-to-gate scope, with a functional unit of 1 tonne of cane processed (tc). Damage to human health ranged from 7.72 × 10−4 to 2.85 × 10−3 disability-adjusted life years/tc; ecosystem from 4.85 × 10−6 to 9.15 × 10−6 species.year/tc; resource scarcity from 10 to 60 United States dollar 2013/tc; total damage costs from 2,100 to 5,410 Thai Baht/tc, and circularity from 0.44 to 0.52. Bioproduct scenarios, except cellulose nanofibers, had lower environmental damage costs than the base case. Biorefinery circularity aligned closely with the highest-value product in each scenario. Biochemical (Lactic acid) was the best overall, with the lowest environmental damage cost and resource scarcity damage, relatively low human health and ecosystem damage, and a high circularity score of 0.5. Biomaterial (Cellulose nanofibers) was the worst due to its highest damage cost from the highest fossil resource scarcity, accounting for over 95 % of resources scarcity damage in all scenarios, and high-water consumption, despite minimum human health damage from the lowest fine particulate matter formation, leading contributor to human health damage mainly from cane burning and biomass electricity, and a high circularity of 0.52. The modified base case was slightly better than the base case across all metrics. Bioproduct scenarios increased circularity; however, higher circularity did not always correlate better environmental performance.
{"title":"Circular economy models of sugarcane biorefinery towards carbon neutrality and environmental sustainability","authors":"Shwe Yie Lin , Nicholas M. Holden , Romanee Thongdara , Thapat Silalertruksa , Shabbir H. Gheewala , Trakarn Prapaspongsa","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sugarcane biorefineries convert sugarcane waste into bioproducts, requiring assessment for environmentally viable processing. This study compared the life cycle environmental impacts, environmental damage costs, and circularity of sugarcane biorefinery scenarios: a base case with pre-harvest cane trash burning and sugar and ethanol production; a modified one with improved energy efficiency; and three bioproduct scenarios producing bagasse-based biobutanol or biochar for bioenergy scenario, lactic or acetic acid for biochemicals, and cane trash-derived cellulose nanofibers or soil conditioner for biomaterials. Bioproduct scenarios assumed green cane harvesting. Life cycle assessment followed a cradle-to-gate scope, with a functional unit of 1 tonne of cane processed (t<sub>c</sub>). Damage to human health ranged from 7.72 × 10<sup>−4</sup> to 2.85 × 10<sup>−3</sup> disability-adjusted life years/t<sub>c</sub>; ecosystem from 4.85 × 10<sup>−6</sup> to 9.15 × 10<sup>−6</sup> species.year/t<sub>c</sub>; resource scarcity from 10 to 60 United States dollar 2013/t<sub>c</sub>; total damage costs from 2,100 to 5,410 Thai Baht/t<sub>c</sub>, and circularity from 0.44 to 0.52. Bioproduct scenarios, except cellulose nanofibers, had lower environmental damage costs than the base case. Biorefinery circularity aligned closely with the highest-value product in each scenario. Biochemical (Lactic acid) was the best overall, with the lowest environmental damage cost and resource scarcity damage, relatively low human health and ecosystem damage, and a high circularity score of 0.5. Biomaterial (Cellulose nanofibers) was the worst due to its highest damage cost from the highest fossil resource scarcity, accounting for over 95 % of resources scarcity damage in all scenarios, and high-water consumption, despite minimum human health damage from the lowest fine particulate matter formation, leading contributor to human health damage mainly from cane burning and biomass electricity, and a high circularity of 0.52. The modified base case was slightly better than the base case across all metrics. Bioproduct scenarios increased circularity; however, higher circularity did not always correlate better environmental performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 305-324"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145004291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-23DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.010
Lillian Tsitsi Mambiri , Riley Guillory , Dilip Depan
Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is critical for addressing bone defects caused by aging populations, chronic diseases, and millions of annual road injuries, yet its potential is hampered by high costs, regulatory delays that deter investment, and healthcare's environmental footprint, which accounts for 8.5 % of the United States' emissions and continues to rise. BTE advancement must prioritize affordability, regulatory efficiency, and climate-conscious innovation to ensure equitable access and sustainability. This work conducts a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and entropy-weighted sustainability indices (SI), a data-driven overall score that weighs economic and environmental metrics by their variability, of stereolithography (SLA) three-dimensional (3D) printing and electrospinning (ES) for polycaprolactone-based scaffold preparation. Results show SLA reduces energy demand per kilogram of scaffold compared to ES, attributed to ES's energy-intensive solvent evaporation and high-voltage fiber formation. When bioactive nanofillers were incorporated, SLA remained cost-competitive and environmentally favorable, whereas ES showed steep increases in energy use, solvent consumption, and ecotoxicity, largely attributed to chloroform. Entropy-weighted SI values reflected these trends: SLA led the ranking, its nanofiller variant remained viable, while ES (with and without nanofillers) performed poorest due to compounded environmental and economic burdens. Adopting solvent recovery systems, such as condensation and closed-loop recycling as well as green solvents and renewable energy, could trim the high energy demand and solvent-intensive processes.
{"title":"Evaluating the sustainability and commercial viability of conventional and traditional bone tissue scaffold fabrication methods","authors":"Lillian Tsitsi Mambiri , Riley Guillory , Dilip Depan","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.07.010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is critical for addressing bone defects caused by aging populations, chronic diseases, and millions of annual road injuries, yet its potential is hampered by high costs, regulatory delays that deter investment, and healthcare's environmental footprint, which accounts for 8.5 % of the United States' emissions and continues to rise. BTE advancement must prioritize affordability, regulatory efficiency, and climate-conscious innovation to ensure equitable access and sustainability. This work conducts a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA), techno-economic analysis (TEA), and entropy-weighted sustainability indices (SI), a data-driven overall score that weighs economic and environmental metrics by their variability, of stereolithography (SLA) three-dimensional (3D) printing and electrospinning (ES) for polycaprolactone-based scaffold preparation. Results show SLA reduces energy demand per kilogram of scaffold compared to ES, attributed to ES's energy-intensive solvent evaporation and high-voltage fiber formation. When bioactive nanofillers were incorporated, SLA remained cost-competitive and environmentally favorable, whereas ES showed steep increases in energy use, solvent consumption, and ecotoxicity, largely attributed to chloroform. Entropy-weighted SI values reflected these trends: SLA led the ranking, its nanofiller variant remained viable, while ES (with and without nanofillers) performed poorest due to compounded environmental and economic burdens. Adopting solvent recovery systems, such as condensation and closed-loop recycling as well as green solvents and renewable energy, could trim the high energy demand and solvent-intensive processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 432-447"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144748751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}