Background
Orthodontic literature has expanded for more than a century; however, most bibliometric studies have examined isolated journals or time periods. No synthesis has integrated the historical evolution of orthodontic publishing with bibliometric evidence to provide a panoramic overview.
Methods
A thematic narrative review was conducted, supported by bibliometric validation. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the NLM Catalog from 1900 to June 2025. The Scopus dataset was imported into CiteSpace to generate keyword frequency and burst analyses, which guided secondary searches in PubMed and Scopus for orthodontics-related articles published in non-orthodontic medical and dental journals. Bibliometric studies were retrieved using targeted queries and by manual cross-referencing of references. Duplicate removal was performed manually in MS Excel by the author with the assistance of a statistician and a librarian, and validated using CiteSpace preprocessing. Extracted data included journal titles, years, study designs, themes, country of origin, citations, indexing status, and quartile ranking.
Results
Approximately 75,000 orthodontic-related articles were identified, including 52,000 from orthodontic journals and 25,000 from non-orthodontic journals. Across the century, 83 orthodontic journals were identified, of which 26 remain active and indexed (PubMed = 17; Scopus = 26). Output increased from fewer than 4,000 publications during 1915–1950 to more than 13,000 during 2011–2020, with nearly 7,000 already indexed in 2021–2025. Trends showed a transition from descriptive reports to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and umbrella reviews. Authorship networks confirmed globalization, with growing contributions from Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East. Thematic mapping highlighted rapid growth in digital workflows, aligners, artificial intelligence, and patient-reported outcomes.
Conclusion
Orthodontic publishing has evolved from localized descriptive accounts to globally networked, digitally disseminated, and evidence-based scholarship. This synthesis of historical milestones with bibliometric validation provides direction for future editorial priorities, methodological rigor, and international collaboration.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
