Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100889
Johanna A.M. du Mortier , Erik J. Giltay , Almar A.L. Kok , Patricia van Oppen , Merijn Eikelenboom , Didi Rhebergen , Richard C. Oude Voshaar , Anton J.L.M. van Balkom , Henny A.D. Visser
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic could be considered a 'symptom provocation test,' which may trigger specific OCD and other psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, we aimed to compare the long-term impact of the pandemic on fear of COVID-19, and contamination, depressive and anxiety symptoms in three groups: individuals with OCD with and without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms and healthy controls.
Methods
From April 2020 to February 2022, we administered 16 online questionnaires on 138 persons with a lifetime diagnosis of OCD and 373 healthy controls. We evaluated outcomes related to fear of COVID-19, cleaning obsessions and compulsions, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Using mixed models, we compared the trajectories among persons with OCD who had pre-pandemic contamination symptoms, those without such symptoms, and healthy controls.
Results
Pre-pandemic contamination symptoms were significantly associated with higher fear of COVID-19, contamination symptoms, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Persons with OCD without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms scored, on average, quite similarly to healthy controls.
Conclusions
Only in persons with pre-pandemic contamination symptoms did the pandemic provoke more fear of COVID-19 and contamination symptoms than in controls. It seems that stress caused by external factors, does not tri trigger OCD symptoms unless there is a connection to the subtype of OCD.
{"title":"Contamination fear during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with lifetime obsessive compulsive disorder and healthy controls: A longitudinal cohort study","authors":"Johanna A.M. du Mortier , Erik J. Giltay , Almar A.L. Kok , Patricia van Oppen , Merijn Eikelenboom , Didi Rhebergen , Richard C. Oude Voshaar , Anton J.L.M. van Balkom , Henny A.D. Visser","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic could be considered a 'symptom provocation test,' which may trigger specific OCD and other psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, we aimed to compare the long-term impact of the pandemic on fear of COVID-19, and contamination, depressive and anxiety symptoms in three groups: individuals with OCD with and without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From April 2020 to February 2022, we administered 16 online questionnaires on 138 persons with a lifetime diagnosis of OCD and 373 healthy controls. We evaluated outcomes related to fear of COVID-19, cleaning obsessions and compulsions, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Using mixed models, we compared the trajectories among persons with OCD who had pre-pandemic contamination symptoms, those without such symptoms, and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pre-pandemic contamination symptoms were significantly associated with higher fear of COVID-19, contamination symptoms, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Persons with OCD without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms scored, on average, quite similarly to healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Only in persons with pre-pandemic contamination symptoms did the pandemic provoke more fear of COVID-19 and contamination symptoms than in controls. It seems that stress caused by external factors, does not tri trigger OCD symptoms unless there is a connection to the subtype of OCD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100889"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000332/pdfft?md5=376c25f2dc243a91a0e3f3207f52ba8d&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000332-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141400601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100896
Alexandra M. Adamis, Bunmi O. Olatunji
Findings on attentional bias (AB) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are highly mixed. Although some studies provide evidence for a threat-related AB in OCD, many others yield null effects. The present review considers three potential factors that may help reconcile this inconsistency: disorder heterogeneity, methodological approaches, and individual differences in attentional control. Reconciling this inconsistency in future research may yield findings that can more directly inform the development of more effective treatment strategies.
{"title":"Reconciling attentional bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Alexandra M. Adamis, Bunmi O. Olatunji","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100896","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100896","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Findings on attentional bias (AB) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are highly mixed. Although some studies provide evidence for a threat-related AB in OCD, many others yield null effects. The present review considers three potential factors that may help reconcile this inconsistency: disorder heterogeneity, methodological approaches, and individual differences in attentional control. Reconciling this inconsistency in future research may yield findings that can more directly inform the development of more effective treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141941959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100894
Emily Bates, Nick Neave, Alyson Dodd, Colin Hamilton
Emotion regulation (ER), executive function (EF) and aggression have all been separately linked with hoarding behaviours. This study aimed to investigate whether difficulties with ER, deficits in EF, and an increase in aggression are linked with hoarding behaviours in a community sample, whilst controlling for anxiety, depression, age, and sex. Using a correlational design, we recruited 225 adults who completed questionnaires of anxiety and depression, hoarding severity, difficulties with ER, EF, and aggression. Two hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted to uncover which factors predicted an increase in hoarding behaviours, as well as the unique variance of these contributing factors. They revealed that difficulties with ER and physical aggression both contributed unique variance to hoarding severity scores. Further research is needed to fully uncover the relationship between aggression and HD, and the interconnection between EF and ER. The current study, although not without its limitations, has implications for further research in clinical samples.
情绪调节(ER)、执行功能(EF)和攻击性都分别与囤积行为有关。本研究旨在调查在社区样本中,情绪调节困难、执行功能缺陷和攻击性增加是否与囤积行为有关,同时控制焦虑、抑郁、年龄和性别。我们采用相关性设计,招募了 225 名成年人,他们填写了有关焦虑和抑郁、囤积严重程度、ER 困难、EF 和攻击性的问卷。我们进行了两次分层多元回归,以揭示哪些因素会导致囤积行为的增加,以及这些诱因的独特变异性。结果表明,ER 困难和身体侵犯都对囤积行为严重程度的评分产生了独特的影响。要全面揭示攻击性和 HD 之间的关系,以及 EF 和 ER 之间的相互联系,还需要进一步的研究。目前的研究虽然有其局限性,但对临床样本的进一步研究具有启示意义。
{"title":"The role of emotional regulation, executive functioning, and aggression in hoarding behaviours","authors":"Emily Bates, Nick Neave, Alyson Dodd, Colin Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100894","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emotion regulation (ER), executive function (EF) and aggression have all been separately linked with hoarding behaviours. This study aimed to investigate whether difficulties with ER, deficits in EF, and an increase in aggression are linked with hoarding behaviours in a community sample, whilst controlling for anxiety, depression, age, and sex. Using a correlational design, we recruited 225 adults who completed questionnaires of anxiety and depression, hoarding severity, difficulties with ER, EF, and aggression. Two hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted to uncover which factors predicted an increase in hoarding behaviours, as well as the unique variance of these contributing factors. They revealed that difficulties with ER and physical aggression both contributed unique variance to hoarding severity scores. Further research is needed to fully uncover the relationship between aggression and HD, and the interconnection between EF and ER. The current study, although not without its limitations, has implications for further research in clinical samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100894"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141606024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-15DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892
Emily J. Carlson , Elizabeth J. Malloy , Jon Grant , David A.F. Haaga
Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings on neurocognitive deficits, particularly in response inhibition and set shifting, when comparing patients with trichotillomania (TTM) to healthy comparison groups. This study used baseline data (N = 36) from a clinical trial of behavior therapy for TTM to test two possible explanations for these mixed results: (a) neurocognitive deficits are only noted among more severely symptomatic patients with TTM; and (b) age of onset is differentially associated with deficits in response inhibition vs. set shifting. Results were inconsistent with these hypotheses. Age of onset was not significantly correlated with either neurocognitive assessment. Interviewer ratings of TTM symptom severity or impairment were not significantly related to neurocognitive test performance. Self-reported symptom severity correlated significantly with motor response inhibition, but in the direction opposite to our expectation, such that faster reaction times to inhibit a dominant response were associated with more severe symptoms. Discussion centered on several possible explanations, including the possibilities that either (a) measurement methods or (b) variation across samples in the prevalence of ADHD comorbidity, not measured in this study, could explain mixed findings on the neuropsychological profile of TTM.
{"title":"Neurocognitive Test Performance in relation to symptom severity and age of onset of trichotillomania","authors":"Emily J. Carlson , Elizabeth J. Malloy , Jon Grant , David A.F. Haaga","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings on neurocognitive deficits, particularly in response inhibition and set shifting, when comparing patients with trichotillomania (TTM) to healthy comparison groups. This study used baseline data (<em>N</em> = 36) from a clinical trial of behavior therapy for TTM to test two possible explanations for these mixed results: (a) neurocognitive deficits are only noted among more severely symptomatic patients with TTM; and (b) age of onset is differentially associated with deficits in response inhibition vs. set shifting. Results were inconsistent with these hypotheses. Age of onset was not significantly correlated with either neurocognitive assessment. Interviewer ratings of TTM symptom severity or impairment were not significantly related to neurocognitive test performance. Self-reported symptom severity correlated significantly with motor response inhibition, but in the direction opposite to our expectation, such that faster reaction times to inhibit a dominant response were associated with more severe symptoms. Discussion centered on several possible explanations, including the possibilities that either (a) measurement methods or (b) variation across samples in the prevalence of ADHD comorbidity, not measured in this study, could explain mixed findings on the neuropsychological profile of TTM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141391321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-13DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100890
Kaushadh Jayakody , Helen Branson
Background
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) have been reported in dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We investigated the comorbidity of OCD and OCS in patients with a diagnosis of dementia or MCI and the risk of developing dementia or MCI for those with a diagnosis of OCD or OCS later in life.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review, searching databases up to March 2023. The quality assessment was performed using the Weight of Evidence (WoE) framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.
Results
Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. The presence of methodological limitations and potential biases was observed in the studies included in this review. The majority were of moderate quality, were conducted in samples selected from tertiary care or research settings. OCS was present in 21–100% of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and 10–45% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Conclusion
OCS is a common symptom in FTD, particularly behavioural variation FTD (bvFTD). The onset of OCD or OCS later in life should warrant careful screening and follow-up to monitor for potential cognitive changes and the risk of developing dementia.
{"title":"Obsessive compulsive symptoms, mild neurocognitive disorder and dementia: A systematic review","authors":"Kaushadh Jayakody , Helen Branson","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) have been reported in dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We investigated the comorbidity of OCD and OCS in patients with a diagnosis of dementia or MCI and the risk of developing dementia or MCI for those with a diagnosis of OCD or OCS later in life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review, searching databases up to March 2023. The quality assessment was performed using the Weight of Evidence (WoE) framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. The presence of methodological limitations and potential biases was observed in the studies included in this review. The majority were of moderate quality, were conducted in samples selected from tertiary care or research settings. OCS was present in 21–100% of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and 10–45% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>OCS is a common symptom in FTD, particularly behavioural variation FTD (bvFTD). The onset of OCD or OCS later in life should warrant careful screening and follow-up to monitor for potential cognitive changes and the risk of developing dementia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100890"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000344/pdfft?md5=c1a662b7837fd0ba16e035ea8887b971&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000344-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141403971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-07DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100881
Ivar Snorrason , Adam C. Jaroszewski , Jennifer L. Greenberg , Hilary Weingarden , Berta J. Summers , Angela Fang , Susanne S. Hoeppner , Eric Hollander , Wayne K. Goodman , Katharine A. Phillips , Sabine Wilhelm
The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess the severity of current BDD. The aim of the study was to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the BDD-YBOCS. The sample included 366 adults with BDD who completed the BDD-YBOCS and other measures of BDD severity/impairment, psychiatric distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) and quality of life. Exploratory factor analysis supported two factors that were weakly correlated with each other (r = 0.21) (1) Severity (i.e., time, distress, interference, and avoidance; 31.6% of the variance): and (2) Resistance/Control (i.e., reduced effort to resist symptoms and lack of control over symptoms; 16.7% of the variance). The Severity factor had good internal consistency (α = 0.82) and good construct validity (rs = 0.69-0.81 with BDD severity/impairment; rs = 0.38-0.56 with depression and anxiety; and rs = 0.48-0.53 with functional impairment and quality of life). The Resistance/Control factor had acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.74) but more limited construct validity (rs = 0.27-0.28 with BDD severity/impairment (rs = 0.04-0.20 with depression and anxiety and rs = 0.05-0.14 with functional impairment and quality of life). Implications for the conceptualization and assessment of BDD severity are discussed.
{"title":"Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: Factor structure and construct validity of subfactors","authors":"Ivar Snorrason , Adam C. Jaroszewski , Jennifer L. Greenberg , Hilary Weingarden , Berta J. Summers , Angela Fang , Susanne S. Hoeppner , Eric Hollander , Wayne K. Goodman , Katharine A. Phillips , Sabine Wilhelm","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess the severity of current BDD. The aim of the study was to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the BDD-YBOCS. The sample included 366 adults with BDD who completed the BDD-YBOCS and other measures of BDD severity/impairment, psychiatric distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) and quality of life. Exploratory factor analysis supported two factors that were weakly correlated with each other (<em>r</em> = 0.21) (1) Severity (i.e., time, distress, interference, and avoidance; 31.6% of the variance): and (2) Resistance/Control (i.e., reduced effort to resist symptoms and lack of control over symptoms; 16.7% of the variance). The Severity factor had good internal consistency (<em>α</em> = 0.82) and good construct validity (<em>rs</em> = 0.69-0.81 with BDD severity/impairment; <em>rs</em> = 0.38-0.56 with depression and anxiety; and <em>rs</em> = 0.48-0.53 with functional impairment and quality of life). The Resistance/Control factor had acceptable internal consistency (<em>α</em> = 0.74) but more limited construct validity (<em>rs</em> = 0.27-0.28 with BDD severity/impairment (<em>rs</em> = 0.04-0.20 with depression and anxiety and <em>rs</em> = 0.05-0.14 with functional impairment and quality of life). Implications for the conceptualization and assessment of BDD severity are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100881"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141415375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100880
Lina Lundström , Ekaterina Ivanova , David Mataix-Cols , Oskar Flygare , Matti Cervin , Christian Rück , Erik Andersson
Incompleteness, that is, a feeling that things are “not just right”, is an understudied symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We used data from 167 adult individuals with OCD who received internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) to examine how incompleteness was associated with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Incompleteness was assessed using the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OCTCDQ). Results showed that the proposed two-factor structure of the OCTCDQ had adequate model/data fit in the present sample. Incompleteness was positively associated with baseline symmetry/ordering symptoms (β = 0.52, [95% CI 0.48 to 0.56], p < 0.001), psychiatric comorbidity (β = 0.23, [95% CI 0.21 to 0.25], p < 0.05) and self-reported symptom severity (Y-BOCS-SR β = 0.35, [95% CI 0.27 to 0.43], p < 0.001; OCI-R β = 0.46, [95% CI 0.34 to 0.59], p < 0.001). Results showed that higher degree of incompleteness predicted a worse treatment outcome on clinician-rated, but not self-rated, measures of symptom severity. Participants with a high (vs. low) degree of incompleteness were less likely to be classified as responders (39% vs. 52%) and remitters (10% vs. 34%) at post-treatment. The results suggest that incompleteness is a clinically relevant feature of OCD, which may require treatment adaptations for some patients but more research is needed to confirm that the findings are not entirely due to measurement error.
不完全性,即感觉事情 "不是恰到好处",是强迫症(OCD)的一种未被充分研究的症状。我们利用 167 名成年强迫症患者接受互联网认知行为疗法(ICBT)的数据,研究了不完全性与临床特征和治疗结果之间的关系。不完全性使用强迫症特质核心维度问卷(OCTCDQ)进行评估。结果表明,在本样本中,OCTCDQ 的双因素结构具有足够的模型/数据拟合度。不完整性与基线对称/排序症状(β = 0.52, [95% CI 0.48 to 0.56], p < 0.001)、精神病合并症(β = 0.23, [95% CI 0.21 to 0.25], p < 0.05)和自我报告的症状严重程度(Y-BOCS-SR β = 0.35, [95% CI 0.27 to 0.43], p < 0.001; OCI-R β = 0.46, [95% CI 0.34 to 0.59], p < 0.001)。结果表明,不完整性程度越高,临床医生评定的治疗效果越差,而自评定的症状严重程度则不然。不完整性程度高(与不完整性程度低相比)的参与者在治疗后被归类为应答者(39% 与 52%)和缓解者(10% 与 34%)的可能性较低。这些结果表明,不完整性是强迫症的一个临床相关特征,可能需要对某些患者的治疗进行调整,但还需要更多的研究来证实这些发现并不完全是测量误差造成的。
{"title":"Incompleteness as a clinical characteristic and predictor of treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Lina Lundström , Ekaterina Ivanova , David Mataix-Cols , Oskar Flygare , Matti Cervin , Christian Rück , Erik Andersson","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100880","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100880","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incompleteness, that is, a feeling that things are “not just right”, is an understudied symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We used data from 167 adult individuals with OCD who received internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) to examine how incompleteness was associated with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Incompleteness was assessed using the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OCTCDQ). Results showed that the proposed two-factor structure of the OCTCDQ had adequate model/data fit in the present sample. Incompleteness was positively associated with baseline symmetry/ordering symptoms (β = 0.52, [95% CI 0.48 to 0.56], <em>p</em> < 0.001), psychiatric comorbidity (β = 0.23, [95% CI 0.21 to 0.25], <em>p</em> < 0.05) and self-reported symptom severity (Y-BOCS-SR β = 0.35, [95% CI 0.27 to 0.43], <em>p</em> < 0.001; OCI-R β = 0.46, [95% CI 0.34 to 0.59], <em>p</em> < 0.001). Results showed that higher degree of incompleteness predicted a worse treatment outcome on clinician-rated, but not self-rated, measures of symptom severity. Participants with a high (vs. low) degree of incompleteness were less likely to be classified as responders (39% vs. 52%) and remitters (10% vs. 34%) at post-treatment. The results suggest that incompleteness is a clinically relevant feature of OCD, which may require treatment adaptations for some patients but more research is needed to confirm that the findings are not entirely due to measurement error.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000241/pdfft?md5=187972b5cf186f4ea51ebf22fe4f05ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000241-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141134117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100874
Cecilie Schultz Isaksen , Per Hove Thomsen , Lara J. Farrell , Davíð R.M.A. Højgaard , Lidewij Wolters , Judith Nissen , Allison M. Waters , Katja A. Hybel
It has been suggested that maladaptive metacognition (beliefs and strategies) is related to the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aims of the study were to explore whether subgroups of pediatric OCD patients could be identified based on self-reported generic metacognition, and to compare these potential subgroups with a non-clinical control group. Additionally, differences between subgroups were examined across demographic (age and sex) and clinical characteristics (OCD severity and insight, types of OCD symptoms, and co-occurring symptoms). The study included a pooled sample of 157 pediatric OCD patients (age 7–18 years) and 58 non-clinical controls. Latent profile analyses supported a model with three profiles characterized by low, moderate, and high levels of maladaptive metacognition relative to the control group. Children and adolescents with higher age, greater OCD severity, specific OCD symptoms (e.g., aggressive, sexual, somatic, religious, and self-rated obsessing symptoms), and/or co-occurring internalizing symptoms (including anxiety and depressive symptoms) had a higher probability of belonging to a group with higher levels of maladaptive metacognition. The emergent profiles indicate heterogeneity in metacognition and clinical expression among children and adolescents with OCD, suggesting that generic metacognition could be a possible treatment target for some of these patients.
{"title":"Metacognitive profiles in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Cecilie Schultz Isaksen , Per Hove Thomsen , Lara J. Farrell , Davíð R.M.A. Højgaard , Lidewij Wolters , Judith Nissen , Allison M. Waters , Katja A. Hybel","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100874","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It has been suggested that maladaptive metacognition (beliefs and strategies) is related to the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aims of the study were to explore whether subgroups of pediatric OCD patients could be identified based on self-reported generic metacognition, and to compare these potential subgroups with a non-clinical control group. Additionally, differences between subgroups were examined across demographic (age and sex) and clinical characteristics (OCD severity and insight, types of OCD symptoms, and co-occurring symptoms). The study included a pooled sample of 157 pediatric OCD patients (age 7–18 years) and 58 non-clinical controls. Latent profile analyses supported a model with three profiles characterized by low, moderate, and high levels of maladaptive metacognition relative to the control group. Children and adolescents with higher age, greater OCD severity, specific OCD symptoms (e.g., aggressive, sexual, somatic, religious, and self-rated obsessing symptoms), and/or co-occurring internalizing symptoms (including anxiety and depressive symptoms) had a higher probability of belonging to a group with higher levels of maladaptive metacognition. The emergent profiles indicate heterogeneity in metacognition and clinical expression among children and adolescents with OCD, suggesting that generic metacognition could be a possible treatment target for some of these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100874"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000186/pdfft?md5=d6318757723bf86dc7e804d7bbd113bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000186-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140633231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872
Rachel M. Prosser , James P. Dennis , Paul M. Salkovskis
The degree to which hoarding disorder (HD) is stigmatised by the public, and that this is internalised by people with HD, is a relatively neglected research area. This review aimed to synthesise current understanding of stigma of HD and its impact on help-seeking. A systematic search was conducted to identify publications which investigated public or internalised stigma, or related concepts like shame and blame, in relation to HD. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using the QualSyst tool. There is very little literature exploring stigma in HD and quality of research is variable. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that a significant proportion of people who hoard and their families experience stigma, and HD is stigmatised by the public and associated with more rejecting attitudes and frustration amongst professionals. Finally, research exploring the impact of stigma on help-seeking in HD tentatively suggested a negative impact of stigma. Further research is needed to replicate and extend findings and address methodological limitations to provide an understanding of stigma on which approaches to enhance wellbeing and treatment uptake in HD can be developed. Systematic review (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42022375820.
囤积症(HD)在多大程度上被公众所鄙视,以及囤积症患者对鄙视的内化程度,是一个相对被忽视的研究领域。本综述旨在综合目前对囤积症耻辱化及其对求助影响的理解。我们进行了系统性搜索,以确定与 HD 有关的调查公众或内化成见或相关概念(如羞耻和自责)的出版物。检索的电子数据库包括 PsycINFO、PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Medline、CINAHL 和 Web of Science。有 15 篇论文符合纳入标准,并使用 QualSyst 工具进行了质量评估。探讨 HD 耻辱感的文献很少,研究质量也参差不齐。尽管如此,文献表明,很大一部分囤积癖患者及其家人都经历过污名化,HD 遭到了公众的污名化,并与专业人士的排斥态度和挫败感联系在一起。最后,探讨污名化对 HD 求助影响的研究初步表明,污名化具有负面影响。需要进一步开展研究,以复制和扩展研究结果,并解决方法上的局限性,从而提供对污名化的理解,并在此基础上制定方法,提高 HD 患者的福祉和治疗接受率。系统综述(PROSPERO)注册号:CRD42022375820。
{"title":"Understanding stigma in hoarding disorder: A systematic review","authors":"Rachel M. Prosser , James P. Dennis , Paul M. Salkovskis","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The degree to which hoarding disorder (HD) is stigmatised by the public, and that this is internalised by people with HD, is a relatively neglected research area. This review aimed to synthesise current understanding of stigma of HD and its impact on help-seeking. A systematic search was conducted to identify publications which investigated public or internalised stigma, or related concepts like shame and blame, in relation to HD. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using the QualSyst tool. There is very little literature exploring stigma in HD and quality of research is variable. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that a significant proportion of people who hoard and their families experience stigma, and HD is stigmatised by the public and associated with more rejecting attitudes and frustration amongst professionals. Finally, research exploring the impact of stigma on help-seeking in HD tentatively suggested a negative impact of stigma. Further research is needed to replicate and extend findings and address methodological limitations to provide an understanding of stigma on which approaches to enhance wellbeing and treatment uptake in HD can be developed. Systematic review (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42022375820.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100872"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000162/pdfft?md5=90f2c225078f191ea0ee77296516918d&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000162-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140620650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100879
Minjee Kook , Michelle E. Yang , Mbonobong Usua , Jane Clinger , Sophie C. Schneider , Leandra N. Berry , Robin Goin-Kochel , Andrew Wiese , David Riddle , Amanda Palo , Allie Townsend , Wayne K. Goodman , Eric A. Storch , Andrew G. Guzick
Autism affects as many as one in 36 children, a majority of whom experience comorbid anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorder. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms share phenotypic similarities with autism characteristics (e.g., repetitive thoughts and behaviors) and some symptoms are difficult to disentangle (e.g., obsessions from specific interests/fixations). Hence, there is a need for OCD assessments that are validated to be used among autistic youth. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale - Second Edition (CY-BOCS-II) in 91 autistic youth seeking treatment for anxiety and/or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The CY-BOCS-II demonstrated strong convergent and divergent validity, internal consistency, and treatment sensitivity. The CY-BOCS-II is a psychometrically sound measure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in autistic youth, although it should be evaluated across larger and more diverse samples.
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Children's Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale second edition in autistic youth","authors":"Minjee Kook , Michelle E. Yang , Mbonobong Usua , Jane Clinger , Sophie C. Schneider , Leandra N. Berry , Robin Goin-Kochel , Andrew Wiese , David Riddle , Amanda Palo , Allie Townsend , Wayne K. Goodman , Eric A. Storch , Andrew G. Guzick","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100879","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Autism affects as many as one in 36 children, a majority of whom experience comorbid anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorder. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms share phenotypic similarities with autism characteristics (e.g., repetitive thoughts and behaviors) and some symptoms are difficult to disentangle (e.g., obsessions from specific interests/fixations). Hence, there is a need for OCD assessments that are validated to be used among autistic youth. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale - Second Edition (CY-BOCS-II) in 91 autistic youth seeking treatment for anxiety and/or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The CY-BOCS-II demonstrated strong convergent and divergent validity, internal consistency, and treatment sensitivity. The CY-BOCS-II is a psychometrically sound measure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in autistic youth, although it should be evaluated across larger and more diverse samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100879"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140843577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}