首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Contamination fear during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with lifetime obsessive compulsive disorder and healthy controls: A longitudinal cohort study 终生强迫症患者和健康对照组在 COVID-19 大流行期间的污染恐惧:一项纵向队列研究
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100889
Johanna A.M. du Mortier , Erik J. Giltay , Almar A.L. Kok , Patricia van Oppen , Merijn Eikelenboom , Didi Rhebergen , Richard C. Oude Voshaar , Anton J.L.M. van Balkom , Henny A.D. Visser

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic could be considered a 'symptom provocation test,' which may trigger specific OCD and other psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, we aimed to compare the long-term impact of the pandemic on fear of COVID-19, and contamination, depressive and anxiety symptoms in three groups: individuals with OCD with and without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms and healthy controls.

Methods

From April 2020 to February 2022, we administered 16 online questionnaires on 138 persons with a lifetime diagnosis of OCD and 373 healthy controls. We evaluated outcomes related to fear of COVID-19, cleaning obsessions and compulsions, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Using mixed models, we compared the trajectories among persons with OCD who had pre-pandemic contamination symptoms, those without such symptoms, and healthy controls.

Results

Pre-pandemic contamination symptoms were significantly associated with higher fear of COVID-19, contamination symptoms, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Persons with OCD without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms scored, on average, quite similarly to healthy controls.

Conclusions

Only in persons with pre-pandemic contamination symptoms did the pandemic provoke more fear of COVID-19 and contamination symptoms than in controls. It seems that stress caused by external factors, does not tri trigger OCD symptoms unless there is a connection to the subtype of OCD.

背景COVID-19大流行可被视为一种 "症状激发试验",可能会引发特定的强迫症和其他精神症状。因此,我们旨在比较大流行对三类人群中 COVID-19 恐惧、污染、抑郁和焦虑症状的长期影响:有大流行前污染症状和无大流行前污染症状的强迫症患者以及健康对照组。方法从 2020 年 4 月到 2022 年 2 月,我们对 138 名终生诊断为强迫症的患者和 373 名健康对照组进行了 16 次在线问卷调查。我们评估了与害怕 COVID-19、清洁强迫症、焦虑和抑郁症状相关的结果。使用混合模型,我们比较了有大流行前污染症状的强迫症患者、无此类症状的强迫症患者和健康对照组的发病轨迹。结果 大流行前污染症状与较高的 COVID-19恐惧、污染症状、焦虑和抑郁症状明显相关。结论与对照组相比,只有大流行前有污染症状的强迫症患者才会对 COVID-19 和污染症状产生更多恐惧。由此看来,除非与强迫症的亚型有关,否则外部因素造成的压力不会引发强迫症症状。
{"title":"Contamination fear during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with lifetime obsessive compulsive disorder and healthy controls: A longitudinal cohort study","authors":"Johanna A.M. du Mortier ,&nbsp;Erik J. Giltay ,&nbsp;Almar A.L. Kok ,&nbsp;Patricia van Oppen ,&nbsp;Merijn Eikelenboom ,&nbsp;Didi Rhebergen ,&nbsp;Richard C. Oude Voshaar ,&nbsp;Anton J.L.M. van Balkom ,&nbsp;Henny A.D. Visser","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The COVID-19 pandemic could be considered a 'symptom provocation test,' which may trigger specific OCD and other psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, we aimed to compare the long-term impact of the pandemic on fear of COVID-19, and contamination, depressive and anxiety symptoms in three groups: individuals with OCD with and without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From April 2020 to February 2022, we administered 16 online questionnaires on 138 persons with a lifetime diagnosis of OCD and 373 healthy controls. We evaluated outcomes related to fear of COVID-19, cleaning obsessions and compulsions, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Using mixed models, we compared the trajectories among persons with OCD who had pre-pandemic contamination symptoms, those without such symptoms, and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pre-pandemic contamination symptoms were significantly associated with higher fear of COVID-19, contamination symptoms, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Persons with OCD without pre-pandemic contamination symptoms scored, on average, quite similarly to healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Only in persons with pre-pandemic contamination symptoms did the pandemic provoke more fear of COVID-19 and contamination symptoms than in controls. It seems that stress caused by external factors, does not tri trigger OCD symptoms unless there is a connection to the subtype of OCD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100889"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000332/pdfft?md5=376c25f2dc243a91a0e3f3207f52ba8d&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000332-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141400601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reconciling attentional bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder 调和强迫症的注意偏差
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100896
Alexandra M. Adamis, Bunmi O. Olatunji

Findings on attentional bias (AB) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are highly mixed. Although some studies provide evidence for a threat-related AB in OCD, many others yield null effects. The present review considers three potential factors that may help reconcile this inconsistency: disorder heterogeneity, methodological approaches, and individual differences in attentional control. Reconciling this inconsistency in future research may yield findings that can more directly inform the development of more effective treatment strategies.

关于强迫症(OCD)中注意偏差(AB)的研究结果众说纷纭。尽管一些研究提供了强迫症中与威胁相关的注意偏差的证据,但许多其他研究却得出了无效的结果。本综述考虑了可能有助于调和这种不一致性的三个潜在因素:障碍的异质性、方法学方法和注意力控制的个体差异。在未来的研究中调和这种不一致性可能会得出更直接的结论,为制定更有效的治疗策略提供依据。
{"title":"Reconciling attentional bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Alexandra M. Adamis,&nbsp;Bunmi O. Olatunji","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100896","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100896","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Findings on attentional bias (AB) in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are highly mixed. Although some studies provide evidence for a threat-related AB in OCD, many others yield null effects. The present review considers three potential factors that may help reconcile this inconsistency: disorder heterogeneity, methodological approaches, and individual differences in attentional control. Reconciling this inconsistency in future research may yield findings that can more directly inform the development of more effective treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100896"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141941959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of emotional regulation, executive functioning, and aggression in hoarding behaviours 情绪调节、执行功能和攻击行为在囤积行为中的作用
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100894
Emily Bates, Nick Neave, Alyson Dodd, Colin Hamilton

Emotion regulation (ER), executive function (EF) and aggression have all been separately linked with hoarding behaviours. This study aimed to investigate whether difficulties with ER, deficits in EF, and an increase in aggression are linked with hoarding behaviours in a community sample, whilst controlling for anxiety, depression, age, and sex. Using a correlational design, we recruited 225 adults who completed questionnaires of anxiety and depression, hoarding severity, difficulties with ER, EF, and aggression. Two hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted to uncover which factors predicted an increase in hoarding behaviours, as well as the unique variance of these contributing factors. They revealed that difficulties with ER and physical aggression both contributed unique variance to hoarding severity scores. Further research is needed to fully uncover the relationship between aggression and HD, and the interconnection between EF and ER. The current study, although not without its limitations, has implications for further research in clinical samples.

情绪调节(ER)、执行功能(EF)和攻击性都分别与囤积行为有关。本研究旨在调查在社区样本中,情绪调节困难、执行功能缺陷和攻击性增加是否与囤积行为有关,同时控制焦虑、抑郁、年龄和性别。我们采用相关性设计,招募了 225 名成年人,他们填写了有关焦虑和抑郁、囤积严重程度、ER 困难、EF 和攻击性的问卷。我们进行了两次分层多元回归,以揭示哪些因素会导致囤积行为的增加,以及这些诱因的独特变异性。结果表明,ER 困难和身体侵犯都对囤积行为严重程度的评分产生了独特的影响。要全面揭示攻击性和 HD 之间的关系,以及 EF 和 ER 之间的相互联系,还需要进一步的研究。目前的研究虽然有其局限性,但对临床样本的进一步研究具有启示意义。
{"title":"The role of emotional regulation, executive functioning, and aggression in hoarding behaviours","authors":"Emily Bates,&nbsp;Nick Neave,&nbsp;Alyson Dodd,&nbsp;Colin Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100894","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emotion regulation (ER), executive function (EF) and aggression have all been separately linked with hoarding behaviours. This study aimed to investigate whether difficulties with ER, deficits in EF, and an increase in aggression are linked with hoarding behaviours in a community sample, whilst controlling for anxiety, depression, age, and sex. Using a correlational design, we recruited 225 adults who completed questionnaires of anxiety and depression, hoarding severity, difficulties with ER, EF, and aggression. Two hierarchical multiple regressions were conducted to uncover which factors predicted an increase in hoarding behaviours, as well as the unique variance of these contributing factors. They revealed that difficulties with ER and physical aggression both contributed unique variance to hoarding severity scores. Further research is needed to fully uncover the relationship between aggression and HD, and the interconnection between EF and ER. The current study, although not without its limitations, has implications for further research in clinical samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100894"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141606024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neurocognitive Test Performance in relation to symptom severity and age of onset of trichotillomania 神经认知测试成绩与症状严重程度和毛发增多症发病年龄的关系
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892
Emily J. Carlson , Elizabeth J. Malloy , Jon Grant , David A.F. Haaga

Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings on neurocognitive deficits, particularly in response inhibition and set shifting, when comparing patients with trichotillomania (TTM) to healthy comparison groups. This study used baseline data (N = 36) from a clinical trial of behavior therapy for TTM to test two possible explanations for these mixed results: (a) neurocognitive deficits are only noted among more severely symptomatic patients with TTM; and (b) age of onset is differentially associated with deficits in response inhibition vs. set shifting. Results were inconsistent with these hypotheses. Age of onset was not significantly correlated with either neurocognitive assessment. Interviewer ratings of TTM symptom severity or impairment were not significantly related to neurocognitive test performance. Self-reported symptom severity correlated significantly with motor response inhibition, but in the direction opposite to our expectation, such that faster reaction times to inhibit a dominant response were associated with more severe symptoms. Discussion centered on several possible explanations, including the possibilities that either (a) measurement methods or (b) variation across samples in the prevalence of ADHD comorbidity, not measured in this study, could explain mixed findings on the neuropsychological profile of TTM.

之前的研究发现,在将嗜毛妄想症(TTM)患者与健康对比组进行比较时,神经认知障碍的结果并不一致,尤其是在反应抑制和集合转移方面。本研究使用了一项 TTM 行为疗法临床试验的基线数据(N = 36),以检验这些不一致结果的两种可能解释:(a)只有症状较严重的 TTM 患者才会出现神经认知缺陷;(b)发病年龄与反应抑制和集合转换的缺陷有不同关系。结果与这些假设不一致。发病年龄与神经认知评估均无明显相关性。受访者对 TTM 症状严重程度或受损程度的评分与神经认知测试成绩无显著相关性。自我报告的症状严重程度与运动反应抑制显著相关,但方向与我们的预期相反,即抑制主导反应的反应时间越快,症状越严重。讨论主要集中在几种可能的解释上,包括(a)测量方法或(b)本研究未测量的多动症合并症患病率在不同样本间的差异,这些都可能解释 TTM 神经心理学特征的不同结果。
{"title":"Neurocognitive Test Performance in relation to symptom severity and age of onset of trichotillomania","authors":"Emily J. Carlson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Malloy ,&nbsp;Jon Grant ,&nbsp;David A.F. Haaga","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100892","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings on neurocognitive deficits, particularly in response inhibition and set shifting, when comparing patients with trichotillomania (TTM) to healthy comparison groups. This study used baseline data (<em>N</em> = 36) from a clinical trial of behavior therapy for TTM to test two possible explanations for these mixed results: (a) neurocognitive deficits are only noted among more severely symptomatic patients with TTM; and (b) age of onset is differentially associated with deficits in response inhibition vs. set shifting. Results were inconsistent with these hypotheses. Age of onset was not significantly correlated with either neurocognitive assessment. Interviewer ratings of TTM symptom severity or impairment were not significantly related to neurocognitive test performance. Self-reported symptom severity correlated significantly with motor response inhibition, but in the direction opposite to our expectation, such that faster reaction times to inhibit a dominant response were associated with more severe symptoms. Discussion centered on several possible explanations, including the possibilities that either (a) measurement methods or (b) variation across samples in the prevalence of ADHD comorbidity, not measured in this study, could explain mixed findings on the neuropsychological profile of TTM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141391321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Obsessive compulsive symptoms, mild neurocognitive disorder and dementia: A systematic review 强迫症状、轻度神经认知障碍和痴呆症:系统回顾
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100890
Kaushadh Jayakody , Helen Branson

Background

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) have been reported in dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We investigated the comorbidity of OCD and OCS in patients with a diagnosis of dementia or MCI and the risk of developing dementia or MCI for those with a diagnosis of OCD or OCS later in life.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, searching databases up to March 2023. The quality assessment was performed using the Weight of Evidence (WoE) framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.

Results

Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. The presence of methodological limitations and potential biases was observed in the studies included in this review. The majority were of moderate quality, were conducted in samples selected from tertiary care or research settings. OCS was present in 21–100% of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and 10–45% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Conclusion

OCS is a common symptom in FTD, particularly behavioural variation FTD (bvFTD). The onset of OCD or OCS later in life should warrant careful screening and follow-up to monitor for potential cognitive changes and the risk of developing dementia.

背景据报道,痴呆症和轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中存在强迫症(OCD)和强迫症状(OCS)。我们调查了痴呆症或 MCI 诊断患者中强迫症和强迫症状的共病情况,以及那些被诊断患有强迫症或强迫症状的患者在晚年罹患痴呆症或 MCI 的风险。结果20项研究符合我们的纳入标准。本综述所纳入的研究存在方法上的局限性和潜在的偏见。大部分研究质量中等,研究样本选自三级医疗机构或研究机构。21%-100%的额颞叶痴呆症(FTD)患者和10%-45%的阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者存在强迫症。晚年出现强迫症或强迫症状时,应进行仔细筛查和随访,以监测潜在的认知变化和发展为痴呆症的风险。
{"title":"Obsessive compulsive symptoms, mild neurocognitive disorder and dementia: A systematic review","authors":"Kaushadh Jayakody ,&nbsp;Helen Branson","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) have been reported in dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). We investigated the comorbidity of OCD and OCS in patients with a diagnosis of dementia or MCI and the risk of developing dementia or MCI for those with a diagnosis of OCD or OCS later in life.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review, searching databases up to March 2023. The quality assessment was performed using the Weight of Evidence (WoE) framework, and a narrative synthesis was completed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty studies met our inclusion criteria. The presence of methodological limitations and potential biases was observed in the studies included in this review. The majority were of moderate quality, were conducted in samples selected from tertiary care or research settings. OCS was present in 21–100% of patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and 10–45% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>OCS is a common symptom in FTD, particularly behavioural variation FTD (bvFTD). The onset of OCD or OCS later in life should warrant careful screening and follow-up to monitor for potential cognitive changes and the risk of developing dementia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100890"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000344/pdfft?md5=c1a662b7837fd0ba16e035ea8887b971&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000344-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141403971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: Factor structure and construct validity of subfactors 针对身体畸形障碍修改的耶鲁-布朗强迫量表:子因子的因子结构和结构效度
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100881
Ivar Snorrason , Adam C. Jaroszewski , Jennifer L. Greenberg , Hilary Weingarden , Berta J. Summers , Angela Fang , Susanne S. Hoeppner , Eric Hollander , Wayne K. Goodman , Katharine A. Phillips , Sabine Wilhelm

The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess the severity of current BDD. The aim of the study was to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the BDD-YBOCS. The sample included 366 adults with BDD who completed the BDD-YBOCS and other measures of BDD severity/impairment, psychiatric distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) and quality of life. Exploratory factor analysis supported two factors that were weakly correlated with each other (r = 0.21) (1) Severity (i.e., time, distress, interference, and avoidance; 31.6% of the variance): and (2) Resistance/Control (i.e., reduced effort to resist symptoms and lack of control over symptoms; 16.7% of the variance). The Severity factor had good internal consistency (α = 0.82) and good construct validity (rs = 0.69-0.81 with BDD severity/impairment; rs = 0.38-0.56 with depression and anxiety; and rs = 0.48-0.53 with functional impairment and quality of life). The Resistance/Control factor had acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.74) but more limited construct validity (rs = 0.27-0.28 with BDD severity/impairment (rs = 0.04-0.20 with depression and anxiety and rs = 0.05-0.14 with functional impairment and quality of life). Implications for the conceptualization and assessment of BDD severity are discussed.

针对身体畸形障碍修改的耶鲁-布朗强迫量表(BDD-YBOCS)是一种半结构化访谈,旨在评估当前 BDD 的严重程度。本研究旨在检验 BDD-YBOCS 的因子结构和构建有效性。样本包括 366 名患有 BDD 的成年人,他们完成了 BDD-YBOCS 和其他有关 BDD 严重程度/损害、精神压力(即焦虑和抑郁)和生活质量的测量。探索性因子分析支持两个相互弱相关的因子(r = 0.21):(1) 严重性(即时间、痛苦、干扰和回避;占方差的 31.6%);(2) 抵抗/控制(即抵抗症状的努力减少和对症状缺乏控制;占方差的 16.7%)。严重性因子具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.82)和良好的建构效度(与 BDD 严重程度/损伤的相关系数为 0.69-0.81 ;与抑郁和焦虑的相关系数为 0.38-0.56 ;与功能损伤和生活质量的相关系数为 0.48-0.53 )。抵抗/控制因子具有可接受的内部一致性(α = 0.74),但其建构效度较为有限(与 BDD 严重程度/损伤的关系为 rs = 0.27-0.28;与抑郁和焦虑的关系为 rs = 0.04-0.20;与功能损伤和生活质量的关系为 rs = 0.05-0.14)。本文讨论了 BDD 严重程度的概念化和评估的意义。
{"title":"Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: Factor structure and construct validity of subfactors","authors":"Ivar Snorrason ,&nbsp;Adam C. Jaroszewski ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Greenberg ,&nbsp;Hilary Weingarden ,&nbsp;Berta J. Summers ,&nbsp;Angela Fang ,&nbsp;Susanne S. Hoeppner ,&nbsp;Eric Hollander ,&nbsp;Wayne K. Goodman ,&nbsp;Katharine A. Phillips ,&nbsp;Sabine Wilhelm","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100881","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100881","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD-YBOCS) is a semi-structured interview designed to assess the severity of current BDD. The aim of the study was to examine the factor structure and construct validity of the BDD-YBOCS. The sample included 366 adults with BDD who completed the BDD-YBOCS and other measures of BDD severity/impairment, psychiatric distress (i.e., anxiety and depression) and quality of life. Exploratory factor analysis supported two factors that were weakly correlated with each other (<em>r</em> = 0.21) (1) Severity (i.e., time, distress, interference, and avoidance; 31.6% of the variance): and (2) Resistance/Control (i.e., reduced effort to resist symptoms and lack of control over symptoms; 16.7% of the variance). The Severity factor had good internal consistency (<em>α</em> = 0.82) and good construct validity (<em>rs</em> = 0.69-0.81 with BDD severity/impairment; <em>rs</em> = 0.38-0.56 with depression and anxiety; and <em>rs</em> = 0.48-0.53 with functional impairment and quality of life). The Resistance/Control factor had acceptable internal consistency (<em>α</em> = 0.74) but more limited construct validity (<em>rs</em> = 0.27-0.28 with BDD severity/impairment (<em>rs</em> = 0.04-0.20 with depression and anxiety and <em>rs</em> = 0.05-0.14 with functional impairment and quality of life). Implications for the conceptualization and assessment of BDD severity are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100881"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141415375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incompleteness as a clinical characteristic and predictor of treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder 不完整性是强迫症的临床特征和治疗效果预测因素
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100880
Lina Lundström , Ekaterina Ivanova , David Mataix-Cols , Oskar Flygare , Matti Cervin , Christian Rück , Erik Andersson

Incompleteness, that is, a feeling that things are “not just right”, is an understudied symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We used data from 167 adult individuals with OCD who received internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) to examine how incompleteness was associated with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Incompleteness was assessed using the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OCTCDQ). Results showed that the proposed two-factor structure of the OCTCDQ had adequate model/data fit in the present sample. Incompleteness was positively associated with baseline symmetry/ordering symptoms (β = 0.52, [95% CI 0.48 to 0.56], p < 0.001), psychiatric comorbidity (β = 0.23, [95% CI 0.21 to 0.25], p < 0.05) and self-reported symptom severity (Y-BOCS-SR β = 0.35, [95% CI 0.27 to 0.43], p < 0.001; OCI-R β = 0.46, [95% CI 0.34 to 0.59], p < 0.001). Results showed that higher degree of incompleteness predicted a worse treatment outcome on clinician-rated, but not self-rated, measures of symptom severity. Participants with a high (vs. low) degree of incompleteness were less likely to be classified as responders (39% vs. 52%) and remitters (10% vs. 34%) at post-treatment. The results suggest that incompleteness is a clinically relevant feature of OCD, which may require treatment adaptations for some patients but more research is needed to confirm that the findings are not entirely due to measurement error.

不完全性,即感觉事情 "不是恰到好处",是强迫症(OCD)的一种未被充分研究的症状。我们利用 167 名成年强迫症患者接受互联网认知行为疗法(ICBT)的数据,研究了不完全性与临床特征和治疗结果之间的关系。不完全性使用强迫症特质核心维度问卷(OCTCDQ)进行评估。结果表明,在本样本中,OCTCDQ 的双因素结构具有足够的模型/数据拟合度。不完整性与基线对称/排序症状(β = 0.52, [95% CI 0.48 to 0.56], p < 0.001)、精神病合并症(β = 0.23, [95% CI 0.21 to 0.25], p < 0.05)和自我报告的症状严重程度(Y-BOCS-SR β = 0.35, [95% CI 0.27 to 0.43], p < 0.001; OCI-R β = 0.46, [95% CI 0.34 to 0.59], p < 0.001)。结果表明,不完整性程度越高,临床医生评定的治疗效果越差,而自评定的症状严重程度则不然。不完整性程度高(与不完整性程度低相比)的参与者在治疗后被归类为应答者(39% 与 52%)和缓解者(10% 与 34%)的可能性较低。这些结果表明,不完整性是强迫症的一个临床相关特征,可能需要对某些患者的治疗进行调整,但还需要更多的研究来证实这些发现并不完全是测量误差造成的。
{"title":"Incompleteness as a clinical characteristic and predictor of treatment outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Lina Lundström ,&nbsp;Ekaterina Ivanova ,&nbsp;David Mataix-Cols ,&nbsp;Oskar Flygare ,&nbsp;Matti Cervin ,&nbsp;Christian Rück ,&nbsp;Erik Andersson","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100880","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100880","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incompleteness, that is, a feeling that things are “not just right”, is an understudied symptom of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We used data from 167 adult individuals with OCD who received internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) to examine how incompleteness was associated with clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Incompleteness was assessed using the Obsessive-Compulsive Trait Core Dimensions Questionnaire (OCTCDQ). Results showed that the proposed two-factor structure of the OCTCDQ had adequate model/data fit in the present sample. Incompleteness was positively associated with baseline symmetry/ordering symptoms (β = 0.52, [95% CI 0.48 to 0.56], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), psychiatric comorbidity (β = 0.23, [95% CI 0.21 to 0.25], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and self-reported symptom severity (Y-BOCS-SR β = 0.35, [95% CI 0.27 to 0.43], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; OCI-R β = 0.46, [95% CI 0.34 to 0.59], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Results showed that higher degree of incompleteness predicted a worse treatment outcome on clinician-rated, but not self-rated, measures of symptom severity. Participants with a high (vs. low) degree of incompleteness were less likely to be classified as responders (39% vs. 52%) and remitters (10% vs. 34%) at post-treatment. The results suggest that incompleteness is a clinically relevant feature of OCD, which may require treatment adaptations for some patients but more research is needed to confirm that the findings are not entirely due to measurement error.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100880"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000241/pdfft?md5=187972b5cf186f4ea51ebf22fe4f05ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000241-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141134117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metacognitive profiles in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder 患有强迫症的儿童和青少年的元认知特征
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100874
Cecilie Schultz Isaksen , Per Hove Thomsen , Lara J. Farrell , Davíð R.M.A. Højgaard , Lidewij Wolters , Judith Nissen , Allison M. Waters , Katja A. Hybel

It has been suggested that maladaptive metacognition (beliefs and strategies) is related to the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aims of the study were to explore whether subgroups of pediatric OCD patients could be identified based on self-reported generic metacognition, and to compare these potential subgroups with a non-clinical control group. Additionally, differences between subgroups were examined across demographic (age and sex) and clinical characteristics (OCD severity and insight, types of OCD symptoms, and co-occurring symptoms). The study included a pooled sample of 157 pediatric OCD patients (age 7–18 years) and 58 non-clinical controls. Latent profile analyses supported a model with three profiles characterized by low, moderate, and high levels of maladaptive metacognition relative to the control group. Children and adolescents with higher age, greater OCD severity, specific OCD symptoms (e.g., aggressive, sexual, somatic, religious, and self-rated obsessing symptoms), and/or co-occurring internalizing symptoms (including anxiety and depressive symptoms) had a higher probability of belonging to a group with higher levels of maladaptive metacognition. The emergent profiles indicate heterogeneity in metacognition and clinical expression among children and adolescents with OCD, suggesting that generic metacognition could be a possible treatment target for some of these patients.

有人认为,适应不良的元认知(信念和策略)与强迫症(OCD)的发展和维持有关。本研究的目的是探讨能否根据自我报告的一般元认知识别出儿科强迫症患者的亚组,并将这些潜在亚组与非临床对照组进行比较。此外,研究还考察了不同人口统计学特征(年龄和性别)和临床特征(强迫症严重程度和洞察力、强迫症症状类型以及共存症状)的亚群之间的差异。该研究包括 157 名儿科强迫症患者(7-18 岁)和 58 名非临床对照者的集合样本。潜特征分析表明,相对于对照组,该模型具有低、中、高三种适应不良元认知特征。年龄越大、强迫症严重程度越高、有特定强迫症症状(如攻击性症状、性症状、躯体症状、宗教症状和自评强迫症状)和/或同时出现内化症状(包括焦虑和抑郁症状)的儿童和青少年,属于适应不良元认知水平较高组别的可能性越大。新出现的特征表明,患有强迫症的儿童和青少年在元认知和临床表现方面存在异质性,这表明通用元认知可能是其中一些患者的治疗目标。
{"title":"Metacognitive profiles in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder","authors":"Cecilie Schultz Isaksen ,&nbsp;Per Hove Thomsen ,&nbsp;Lara J. Farrell ,&nbsp;Davíð R.M.A. Højgaard ,&nbsp;Lidewij Wolters ,&nbsp;Judith Nissen ,&nbsp;Allison M. Waters ,&nbsp;Katja A. Hybel","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100874","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It has been suggested that maladaptive metacognition (beliefs and strategies) is related to the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The aims of the study were to explore whether subgroups of pediatric OCD patients could be identified based on self-reported generic metacognition, and to compare these potential subgroups with a non-clinical control group. Additionally, differences between subgroups were examined across demographic (age and sex) and clinical characteristics (OCD severity and insight, types of OCD symptoms, and co-occurring symptoms). The study included a pooled sample of 157 pediatric OCD patients (age 7–18 years) and 58 non-clinical controls. Latent profile analyses supported a model with three profiles characterized by low, moderate, and high levels of maladaptive metacognition relative to the control group. Children and adolescents with higher age, greater OCD severity, specific OCD symptoms (e.g., aggressive, sexual, somatic, religious, and self-rated obsessing symptoms), and/or co-occurring internalizing symptoms (including anxiety and depressive symptoms) had a higher probability of belonging to a group with higher levels of maladaptive metacognition. The emergent profiles indicate heterogeneity in metacognition and clinical expression among children and adolescents with OCD, suggesting that generic metacognition could be a possible treatment target for some of these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100874"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000186/pdfft?md5=d6318757723bf86dc7e804d7bbd113bb&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000186-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140633231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding stigma in hoarding disorder: A systematic review 了解囤积症的成见:系统回顾
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872
Rachel M. Prosser , James P. Dennis , Paul M. Salkovskis

The degree to which hoarding disorder (HD) is stigmatised by the public, and that this is internalised by people with HD, is a relatively neglected research area. This review aimed to synthesise current understanding of stigma of HD and its impact on help-seeking. A systematic search was conducted to identify publications which investigated public or internalised stigma, or related concepts like shame and blame, in relation to HD. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using the QualSyst tool. There is very little literature exploring stigma in HD and quality of research is variable. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that a significant proportion of people who hoard and their families experience stigma, and HD is stigmatised by the public and associated with more rejecting attitudes and frustration amongst professionals. Finally, research exploring the impact of stigma on help-seeking in HD tentatively suggested a negative impact of stigma. Further research is needed to replicate and extend findings and address methodological limitations to provide an understanding of stigma on which approaches to enhance wellbeing and treatment uptake in HD can be developed. Systematic review (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42022375820.

囤积症(HD)在多大程度上被公众所鄙视,以及囤积症患者对鄙视的内化程度,是一个相对被忽视的研究领域。本综述旨在综合目前对囤积症耻辱化及其对求助影响的理解。我们进行了系统性搜索,以确定与 HD 有关的调查公众或内化成见或相关概念(如羞耻和自责)的出版物。检索的电子数据库包括 PsycINFO、PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Medline、CINAHL 和 Web of Science。有 15 篇论文符合纳入标准,并使用 QualSyst 工具进行了质量评估。探讨 HD 耻辱感的文献很少,研究质量也参差不齐。尽管如此,文献表明,很大一部分囤积癖患者及其家人都经历过污名化,HD 遭到了公众的污名化,并与专业人士的排斥态度和挫败感联系在一起。最后,探讨污名化对 HD 求助影响的研究初步表明,污名化具有负面影响。需要进一步开展研究,以复制和扩展研究结果,并解决方法上的局限性,从而提供对污名化的理解,并在此基础上制定方法,提高 HD 患者的福祉和治疗接受率。系统综述(PROSPERO)注册号:CRD42022375820。
{"title":"Understanding stigma in hoarding disorder: A systematic review","authors":"Rachel M. Prosser ,&nbsp;James P. Dennis ,&nbsp;Paul M. Salkovskis","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100872","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The degree to which hoarding disorder (HD) is stigmatised by the public, and that this is internalised by people with HD, is a relatively neglected research area. This review aimed to synthesise current understanding of stigma of HD and its impact on help-seeking. A systematic search was conducted to identify publications which investigated public or internalised stigma, or related concepts like shame and blame, in relation to HD. The electronic databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised for quality using the QualSyst tool. There is very little literature exploring stigma in HD and quality of research is variable. Nevertheless, the literature suggests that a significant proportion of people who hoard and their families experience stigma, and HD is stigmatised by the public and associated with more rejecting attitudes and frustration amongst professionals. Finally, research exploring the impact of stigma on help-seeking in HD tentatively suggested a negative impact of stigma. Further research is needed to replicate and extend findings and address methodological limitations to provide an understanding of stigma on which approaches to enhance wellbeing and treatment uptake in HD can be developed. Systematic review (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42022375820.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100872"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364924000162/pdfft?md5=90f2c225078f191ea0ee77296516918d&pid=1-s2.0-S2211364924000162-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140620650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric properties of the Children's Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale second edition in autistic youth 儿童雅礼-布朗强迫症量表第二版在自闭症青少年中的心理测量特性
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100879
Minjee Kook , Michelle E. Yang , Mbonobong Usua , Jane Clinger , Sophie C. Schneider , Leandra N. Berry , Robin Goin-Kochel , Andrew Wiese , David Riddle , Amanda Palo , Allie Townsend , Wayne K. Goodman , Eric A. Storch , Andrew G. Guzick

Autism affects as many as one in 36 children, a majority of whom experience comorbid anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorder. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms share phenotypic similarities with autism characteristics (e.g., repetitive thoughts and behaviors) and some symptoms are difficult to disentangle (e.g., obsessions from specific interests/fixations). Hence, there is a need for OCD assessments that are validated to be used among autistic youth. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale - Second Edition (CY-BOCS-II) in 91 autistic youth seeking treatment for anxiety and/or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The CY-BOCS-II demonstrated strong convergent and divergent validity, internal consistency, and treatment sensitivity. The CY-BOCS-II is a psychometrically sound measure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in autistic youth, although it should be evaluated across larger and more diverse samples.

每 36 名儿童中就有 1 名患有自闭症,其中大多数都合并有焦虑症或强迫症。强迫症状与自闭症的表型特征(如重复性想法和行为)有相似之处,而且有些症状难以区分(如强迫症与特定兴趣/固着)。因此,有必要为自闭症青少年提供经过验证的强迫症评估。本研究针对 91 名因焦虑和/或强迫症状寻求治疗的自闭症青少年,评估了儿童雅礼-布朗强迫症量表-第二版(CY-BOCS-II)的心理测量特性。CY-BOCS-II 具有很强的收敛性和发散性、内部一致性和治疗敏感性。尽管 CY-BOCS-II 还需要在更大范围和更多样化的样本中进行评估,但它在自闭症青少年强迫症状的心理测量方面具有良好的计量学意义。
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Children's Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale second edition in autistic youth","authors":"Minjee Kook ,&nbsp;Michelle E. Yang ,&nbsp;Mbonobong Usua ,&nbsp;Jane Clinger ,&nbsp;Sophie C. Schneider ,&nbsp;Leandra N. Berry ,&nbsp;Robin Goin-Kochel ,&nbsp;Andrew Wiese ,&nbsp;David Riddle ,&nbsp;Amanda Palo ,&nbsp;Allie Townsend ,&nbsp;Wayne K. Goodman ,&nbsp;Eric A. Storch ,&nbsp;Andrew G. Guzick","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100879","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100879","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Autism affects as many as one in 36 children, a majority of whom experience comorbid anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorder. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms share phenotypic similarities with autism characteristics (e.g., repetitive thoughts and behaviors) and some symptoms are difficult to disentangle (e.g., obsessions from specific interests/fixations). Hence, there is a need for OCD assessments that are validated to be used among autistic youth. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale - Second Edition (CY-BOCS-II) in 91 autistic youth seeking treatment for anxiety and/or obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The CY-BOCS-II demonstrated strong convergent and divergent validity, internal consistency, and treatment sensitivity. The CY-BOCS-II is a psychometrically sound measure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in autistic youth, although it should be evaluated across larger and more diverse samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100879"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140843577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1