Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103069
Magnus Klofsten, Alexander Brem, Maribel Guerrero, David Urbano
Despite extensive research on academic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial universities, this special issue challenges conventional beliefs by examining intrapreneurship in academia. It aims to investigate how faculty and staff can adopt entrepreneurial behaviors and cultivate an entrepreneurial approach within their roles as researchers and educators, in diverse academic contexts. The 11 papers included in this issue span various domains of intrapreneurial universities, broadening the original concept beyond initial expectations set forth in the call for papers. Exploring a spectrum of intrapreneurial initiatives, this issue seeks to enhance understanding and broaden perspectives on intrapreneurial behaviors within universities through various research approaches and methodologies. Based on the contributions received, we reflect on theoretical and practical implications and delineate future directions for academic intrapreneurship research.
{"title":"Intrapreneurial universities in digital times - New ways of thinking and future challenges","authors":"Magnus Klofsten, Alexander Brem, Maribel Guerrero, David Urbano","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103069","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite extensive research on academic entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial universities, this special issue challenges conventional beliefs by examining intrapreneurship in academia. It aims to investigate how faculty and staff can adopt entrepreneurial behaviors and cultivate an entrepreneurial approach within their roles as researchers and educators, in diverse academic contexts. The 11 papers included in this issue span various domains of intrapreneurial universities, broadening the original concept beyond initial expectations set forth in the call for papers. Exploring a spectrum of intrapreneurial initiatives, this issue seeks to enhance understanding and broaden perspectives on intrapreneurial behaviors within universities through various research approaches and methodologies. Based on the contributions received, we reflect on theoretical and practical implications and delineate future directions for academic intrapreneurship research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141596012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103065
Matthias Huegel
This study conceptualizes a quadrant model characterizing four profiles by contrasting university scientists’ multiple goals: research performance and commercialization. Since literature shows that these goals are conflicting but not mutually exclusive, social capital theory is drawn to test the influence of scientists’ bonding, bridging, and linking social capital on their profile affiliation. Survey data from 1057 German scientists is utilized to estimate a multinomial logistic regression model relating scientists’ profiles to the different forms of social capital. The results show that only 4.16% of the scientists achieve above-average research performance and also commercialize their research results, whereby all three forms of their social capital positively impact the achievement of these goals. Furthermore, bonding social capital positively relates to scientists with above-average research performance but no commercialized research results. Bridging social capital facilitates scientists to commercialize results, albeit with below-average research performance. In addition, an inverted U-shaped relationship between scientists’ bonding social capital and their research performance is identified, suggesting that an excess of this form of social capital may impede scientists’ ability to achieve multiple goals. The results are discussed and policy recommendations are derived.
本研究通过对比大学科学家的多重目标:研究绩效和商业化,构思了一个四象限模型,描述了四种特征。由于文献表明这些目标相互冲突但并不相互排斥,因此引用社会资本理论来检验科学家的纽带、桥梁和联系社会资本对其特征归属的影响。我们利用对 1057 名德国科学家的调查数据,估算了一个将科学家的个人简介与不同形式的社会资本相关联的多项式逻辑回归模型。结果表明,只有 4.16% 的科学家取得了高于平均水平的研究绩效,并将其研究成果商业化,而他们的三种社会资本形式都对这些目标的实现产生了积极影响。此外,纽带型社会资本与研究绩效高于平均水平但没有商业化研究成果的科学家呈正相关。尽管研究绩效低于平均水平,但桥梁型社会资本有助于科学家将成果商业化。此外,研究还发现科学家的纽带型社会资本与他们的研究绩效之间存在倒 U 型关系,这表明这种形式的社会资本过多可能会阻碍科学家实现多重目标的能力。本文对研究结果进行了讨论,并提出了政策建议。
{"title":"University scientists’ multiple goals achievement: Social capital and its impact on research performance and research commercialization","authors":"Matthias Huegel","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103065","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study conceptualizes a quadrant model characterizing four profiles by contrasting university scientists’ multiple goals: research performance and commercialization. Since literature shows that these goals are conflicting but not mutually exclusive, social capital theory is drawn to test the influence of scientists’ bonding, bridging, and linking social capital on their profile affiliation. Survey data from 1057 German scientists is utilized to estimate a multinomial logistic regression model relating scientists’ profiles to the different forms of social capital. The results show that only 4.16% of the scientists achieve above-average research performance and also commercialize their research results, whereby all three forms of their social capital positively impact the achievement of these goals. Furthermore, bonding social capital positively relates to scientists with above-average research performance but no commercialized research results. Bridging social capital facilitates scientists to commercialize results, albeit with below-average research performance. In addition, an inverted U-shaped relationship between scientists’ bonding social capital and their research performance is identified, suggesting that an excess of this form of social capital may impede scientists’ ability to achieve multiple goals. The results are discussed and policy recommendations are derived.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001159/pdfft?md5=5bef414f17a0cef4c6e35cf0ed1c7bb1&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224001159-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141481097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-19DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103061
Hua Song , Wenyi Liu , Kangkang Yu , Mengwei Han
This study highlights the role of blockchain technology in addressing the trust crisis in supply chain operations and financial activities. While previous research has acknowledged blockchain as a response to trust issues, limited studies have explored its specific contributions and its impact on accelerating cash flow in supply chains. Drawing on governance theory, this study investigates the relationship between blockchain technology and supply chain finance (SCF) through multiple case studies. The central argument is that blockchain technology alone does not automatically generate trust. Instead, trust is established through the configuration of various governance mechanisms. We propose that trust in blockchain applications is derived from two main factors: the requirement of codifiability and verifiability. Through a cross-case analysis, we found that in situations where both the requirement of codifiability and verifiability are high, blockchain governance tends to dominate. When only one factor is high, a configuration of blockchain governance and relational governance emerges. When both factors are low, contractual governance proves to be efficient. This study underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of trust dynamics in blockchain applications and highlights the importance of considering contextual factors in trust research related to blockchain technology.
{"title":"Trusting the trust machine: How does blockchain-enabled governance configuration enhance financing credibility?","authors":"Hua Song , Wenyi Liu , Kangkang Yu , Mengwei Han","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103061","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study highlights the role of blockchain technology in addressing the trust crisis in supply chain operations and financial activities. While previous research has acknowledged blockchain as a response to trust issues, limited studies have explored its specific contributions and its impact on accelerating cash flow in supply chains. Drawing on governance theory, this study investigates the relationship between blockchain technology and supply chain finance (SCF) through multiple case studies. The central argument is that blockchain technology alone does not automatically generate trust. Instead, trust is established through the configuration of various governance mechanisms. We propose that trust in blockchain applications is derived from two main factors: the requirement of codifiability and verifiability. Through a cross-case analysis, we found that in situations where both the requirement of codifiability and verifiability are high, blockchain governance tends to dominate. When only one factor is high, a configuration of blockchain governance and relational governance emerges. When both factors are low, contractual governance proves to be efficient. This study underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of trust dynamics in blockchain applications and highlights the importance of considering contextual factors in trust research related to blockchain technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103046
Katarina Blomkvist , Jeanette Engzell , Philip Kappen , Ivo Zander
Many businesses are finding it difficult to strengthen employees' intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing. In this study, we investigate the organizational conditions that are conducive to the formation of such intentions, specifically employees' intentions to initiate the development of new products or services in their host corporation. The results from a survey of 3492 employees of Swedish companies, including small, medium-sized, and large firms, reveal that recognizing and rewarding personal achievements, maintaining a risk-taking organizational culture, and top management support are all associated with stronger employee intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing. There is weaker support for the predicted positive effect of personal independence and the presence of intrapreneurial role models. Time availability appears to have an inverted u-shaped relationship to employees’ intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing. Overall, the findings support the idea that organizations can be purposefully designed for strengthening intrapreneurial new venturing among their employees.
许多企业发现,要加强员工参与企业内新创业的意愿非常困难。在本研究中,我们调查了有利于形成这种意向的组织条件,特别是员工在其所在企业发起开发新产品或服务的意向。我们对瑞典公司(包括小型、中型和大型公司)的 3492 名员工进行了调查,结果显示,认可和奖励个人成就、保持敢于冒险的组织文化以及高层管理者的支持,都与员工更强烈的内部创业意向有关。个人独立性和内部创业榜样的存在对预测的积极影响的支持较弱。时间可用性似乎与员工的内部创业新企业意向呈倒 U 型关系。总之,研究结果支持这样一种观点,即可以有目的地设计组织,以加强员工的内部创业型新风险投资。
{"title":"How organizational conditions affect employees’ intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing","authors":"Katarina Blomkvist , Jeanette Engzell , Philip Kappen , Ivo Zander","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103046","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many businesses are finding it difficult to strengthen employees' intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing. In this study, we investigate the organizational conditions that are conducive to the formation of such intentions, specifically employees' intentions to initiate the development of new products or services in their host corporation. The results from a survey of 3492 employees of Swedish companies, including small, medium-sized, and large firms, reveal that recognizing and rewarding personal achievements, maintaining a risk-taking organizational culture, and top management support are all associated with stronger employee intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing. There is weaker support for the predicted positive effect of personal independence and the presence of intrapreneurial role models. Time availability appears to have an inverted u-shaped relationship to employees’ intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing. Overall, the findings support the idea that organizations can be purposefully designed for strengthening intrapreneurial new venturing among their employees.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000968/pdfft?md5=1341d246d3949f0753158786d424f552&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224000968-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141323342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the connection between basic science and its practical applications is critical to consider the social justification of the substantial governmental investments in science. However, there's a limited understanding of global research patterns and the dynamics of researcher collaboration from a basic-applied perspective because such studies have been mainly focused only on the biomedical field. Here, the main goal is to propose an indicator to quantify the degree of basic-applied research in academic papers. Using the indicator, we uncover how material science has advanced from basic to applied research, based on the international trends of the indicators and the affiliations of the scientists involved. We develop a methodology that indexes levels of advancement from basic research to applied research based on large-scale text data. The continuous scores assigned to each paper are derived from a vector space embedding technical terms from a broad network data. These scores align with experts' views in material science. This methodology enables us to monitor international trends that China has significantly advanced into applied research, as well as Chinese applied scientists increasingly associating with their domestic institutions. As science and technology implication, our methodology extends the boundary of assessing scientific research on its proximity to real-world applications and provides a tangible measure for funding agencies managing to fund or design research environments.
{"title":"Quantifying advances from basic research to applied research in material science","authors":"Noriyuki Higashide , Yi Zhang , Kimitaka Asatani , Takahiro Miura , Ichiro Sakata","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103050","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exploring the connection between basic science and its practical applications is critical to consider the social justification of the substantial governmental investments in science. However, there's a limited understanding of global research patterns and the dynamics of researcher collaboration from a basic-applied perspective because such studies have been mainly focused only on the biomedical field. Here, the main goal is to propose an indicator to quantify the degree of basic-applied research in academic papers. Using the indicator, we uncover how material science has advanced from basic to applied research, based on the international trends of the indicators and the affiliations of the scientists involved. We develop a methodology that indexes levels of advancement from basic research to applied research based on large-scale text data. The continuous scores assigned to each paper are derived from a vector space embedding technical terms from a broad network data. These scores align with experts' views in material science. This methodology enables us to monitor international trends that China has significantly advanced into applied research, as well as Chinese applied scientists increasingly associating with their domestic institutions. As science and technology implication, our methodology extends the boundary of assessing scientific research on its proximity to real-world applications and provides a tangible measure for funding agencies managing to fund or design research environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001007/pdfft?md5=45dd8f283c4875c0bf63b5038186c685&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224001007-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141294910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-08DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103054
Andrea Sabatini , Thomas O'Toole
Through a single longitudinal case study of an Italian spinout, this paper develops the concept and processes of technology co-development competence (TCDC). The study adopts the market-as-network perspective for its theoretical framing. TCDC is developed in interaction with customers in a spinout’s network. This competency is possessed by the firm and enacted for the development of its technology within its business network over time - from establishment to embeddedness. The TCDC concept is developed from the literature and case data and is made up of three elements – information and knowledge integration, multi-actor coordination, and interface management. The data collected comprises twenty eight interviews with twelve informants. The study also examines how TCDC evolves in interaction between the focal firm and its business network. It is found to evolve through four processes – technological frictions and tensions management, network-level relationship processes, product features development, and technological co-development enablement. The study outlines a model that presents how TCDC evolves over time in the spinout’s network as it engages with an increasing number of different actors. The model highlights how the elements and processes of TCDC unfold.
{"title":"Technological co-development competence: A longitudinal case of a software development spinout","authors":"Andrea Sabatini , Thomas O'Toole","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103054","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Through a single longitudinal case study of an Italian spinout, this paper develops the concept and processes of technology co-development competence (TCDC). The study adopts the market-as-network perspective for its theoretical framing. TCDC is developed in interaction with customers in a spinout’s network. This competency is possessed by the firm and enacted for the development of its technology within its business network over time - from establishment to embeddedness. The TCDC concept is developed from the literature and case data and is made up of three elements – information and knowledge integration, multi-actor coordination, and interface management. The data collected comprises twenty eight interviews with twelve informants. The study also examines how TCDC evolves in interaction between the focal firm and its business network. It is found to evolve through four processes – technological frictions and tensions management, network-level relationship processes, product features development, and technological co-development enablement. The study outlines a model that presents how TCDC evolves over time in the spinout’s network as it engages with an increasing number of different actors. The model highlights how the elements and processes of TCDC unfold.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001044/pdfft?md5=f028313f54ad5d768610637a00c1d48c&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224001044-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141294143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103051
Vincenzo Corvello , Ciro Troise , Giovanni Schiuma , Paul Jones
Start-ups can make a decisive contribution to the development of innovation. These organizations are designed to experiment with new technologies and business models. In their growth process, learning from failure plays a decisive role. This study enriches our understanding of learning from failure, particularly in start-ups, by analyzing 21 innovative start-ups that have faced experiences of failure. The theories of organizational learning and dynamic capabilities are applied to identify the responses of start-ups to failure and their implications in terms of learning. Six response strategies were identified: external monitoring, internal evaluation, resource acquisition and mobilization, value creation and capture, team-level entrepreneurial, and organizational learning. These response strategies are grouped into the three dynamic capabilities dimensions: sensing, seizing, and transforming. These strategies are relevant for start-ups to overcome difficulties and continue their growth and innovation. They also offer a guideline for start-ups to develop strategies for systematic learning from failures.
{"title":"How start-ups translate learning from innovation failure into strategies for growth","authors":"Vincenzo Corvello , Ciro Troise , Giovanni Schiuma , Paul Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103051","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Start-ups can make a decisive contribution to the development of innovation. These organizations are designed to experiment with new technologies and business models. In their growth process, learning from failure plays a decisive role. This study enriches our understanding of learning from failure, particularly in start-ups, by analyzing 21 innovative start-ups that have faced experiences of failure. The theories of organizational learning and dynamic capabilities are applied to identify the responses of start-ups to failure and their implications in terms of learning. Six response strategies were identified: external monitoring, internal evaluation, resource acquisition and mobilization, value creation and capture, team-level entrepreneurial, and organizational learning. These response strategies are grouped into the three dynamic capabilities dimensions: sensing, seizing, and transforming. These strategies are relevant for start-ups to overcome difficulties and continue their growth and innovation. They also offer a guideline for start-ups to develop strategies for systematic learning from failures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141242229","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103052
Hongshan Ai , Sachin Kumar Mangla , Malin Song , Xiaoqing Tan , Shangfeng Zhang
Technology-enabled business model innovations (BMIs) are gaining increasing attention. However, the effects of technology-enabled BMIs on sustainable development have not been fully investigated. Using the implementation of the National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone (NBDCPZ) policy as a quasi-experiment, this paper analyzes the impact of technology-enabled BMIs on the carbon emissions in China. Our results indicate that the NBDCPZ policy significantly increases technology-enabled BMIs and reduces carbon emissions. These results remain consistent after conducting a series of robustness tests. Furthermore, we find that the reduction in carbon emissions is greater in western and northeastern cities or cities with stricter environmental regulations, ample higher education resources, or less reliance on natural resources. An analysis of the mechanisms indicates that the NBDCPZ policy improves energy structure and efficiency, further reducing carbon emissions. This study suggests that companies should be encouraged to adopt technology-enabled BMIs to promote low-carbon development.
{"title":"Technology-enabled business model innovation and carbon emission reduction: Evidence from a place-based policy in China","authors":"Hongshan Ai , Sachin Kumar Mangla , Malin Song , Xiaoqing Tan , Shangfeng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103052","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Technology-enabled business model innovations (BMIs) are gaining increasing attention. However, the effects of technology-enabled BMIs on sustainable development have not been fully investigated. Using the implementation of the National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone (NBDCPZ) policy as a quasi-experiment, this paper analyzes the impact of technology-enabled BMIs on the carbon emissions in China. Our results indicate that the NBDCPZ policy significantly increases technology-enabled BMIs and reduces carbon emissions. These results remain consistent after conducting a series of robustness tests. Furthermore, we find that the reduction in carbon emissions is greater in western and northeastern cities or cities with stricter environmental regulations, ample higher education resources, or less reliance on natural resources. An analysis of the mechanisms indicates that the NBDCPZ policy improves energy structure and efficiency, further reducing carbon emissions. This study suggests that companies should be encouraged to adopt technology-enabled BMIs to promote low-carbon development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141242230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-29DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103048
Sergey Kolesnikov , Anna P. Goldstein , Bixuan Sun , Gabriel Chan , Venkatesh Narayanamurti , Laura Diaz Anadon
Technology spillovers, understood as knowledge flows across technology domains, are an important mechanism for innovation, as progress in one technology area can lead to unexpected benefits in other technology areas. Despite the importance of technology spillovers in theories of recombinant innovation, significant gaps remain in our understanding of how spillovers across knowledge domains occur, what factors enable or affect spillovers, or how much consideration should be given to technology spillovers in research and innovation policy and management. In this paper, we develop and demonstrate novel conceptual and methodological tools to address these knowledge gaps. Specifically, we introduce a conceptual framework that views technology spillovers as a dynamic process of micro-level knowledge transfer across technological domains that drives recombinant innovation in a knowledge-receiving domain. We use this framework to develop a process-tracing methodology for identifying and analyzing individual micro-level technology spillovers. We demonstrate the application of our framework and methodology in a case of three important innovations in crystalline silicon solar photovoltaics by reconstructing a detailed history of how technology spillovers have played a critical role in enabling and driving these three innovations over time. We show how our approach generates important insights relevant to public policy and R&D management that aim to harness spillovers for accelerating innovation.
{"title":"A framework and methodology for analyzing technology spillover processes with an application in solar photovoltaics","authors":"Sergey Kolesnikov , Anna P. Goldstein , Bixuan Sun , Gabriel Chan , Venkatesh Narayanamurti , Laura Diaz Anadon","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103048","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Technology spillovers, understood as knowledge flows across technology domains, are an important mechanism for innovation, as progress in one technology area can lead to unexpected benefits in other technology areas. Despite the importance of technology spillovers in theories of recombinant innovation, significant gaps remain in our understanding of how spillovers across knowledge domains occur, what factors enable or affect spillovers, or how much consideration should be given to technology spillovers in research and innovation policy and management. In this paper, we develop and demonstrate novel conceptual and methodological tools to address these knowledge gaps. Specifically, we introduce a conceptual framework that views technology spillovers as a dynamic process of micro-level knowledge transfer across technological domains that drives recombinant innovation in a knowledge-receiving domain. We use this framework to develop a process-tracing methodology for identifying and analyzing individual micro-level technology spillovers. We demonstrate the application of our framework and methodology in a case of three important innovations in crystalline silicon solar photovoltaics by reconstructing a detailed history of how technology spillovers have played a critical role in enabling and driving these three innovations over time. We show how our approach generates important insights relevant to public policy and R&D management that aim to harness spillovers for accelerating innovation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000981/pdfft?md5=4c4a7409f3fc652329494b4a3d34645c&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224000981-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141164545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-29DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103017
Marija Cubric , Feng Li
Building on the literature on the concept-product gap in new product development, we examine how FinTech SMEs are developing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based innovations and which organisational or project factors best contribute to the acceleration of AI innovation. The empirical evidence collected from interviews with key stakeholders, practitioners’ forums, and public company documents yields two distinct approaches that differ in their potential for accelerating innovation and reducing the concept-product gap. From a contingency perspective, these two approaches are expanded into four distinct development process configurations, contingent on the business development stage, reliance on 3rd party platforms, availability of high volumes of data, investment level, organisational agility, and level of novelty. The resulting process typology could be used as a diagnostic tool for FinTech SMEs interested in effectively leveraging AI innovation. Using contingency theory, we further develop these insights into a new theoretical framework to explain how AI innovation development unfolds in FinTech SMEs and the rationale for different implementations. Our new process typology and theoretical model can help researchers investigate the mechanisms underlying technological innovation processes. We further identify the specific reasons why the potential of AI for creating new services and disrupting incumbents via digital startups has not been fully realised even in contexts with significant investment and support from public and private business development programmes. This field is still rapidly evolving, and thus, new areas for future research are also highlighted.
{"title":"Bridging the ‘Concept–Product’ gap in new product development: Emerging insights from the application of artificial intelligence in FinTech SMEs","authors":"Marija Cubric , Feng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Building on the literature on the concept-product gap in new product development, we examine how FinTech SMEs are developing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based innovations and which organisational or project factors best contribute to the acceleration of AI innovation. The empirical evidence collected from interviews with key stakeholders, practitioners’ forums, and public company documents yields two distinct approaches that differ in their potential for accelerating innovation and reducing the concept-product gap. From a contingency perspective, these two approaches are expanded into four distinct development process configurations, contingent on the business development stage, reliance on 3rd party platforms, availability of high volumes of data, investment level, organisational agility, and level of novelty. The resulting process typology could be used as a diagnostic tool for FinTech SMEs interested in effectively leveraging AI innovation. Using contingency theory, we further develop these insights into a new theoretical framework to explain how AI innovation development unfolds in FinTech SMEs and the rationale for different implementations. Our new process typology and theoretical model can help researchers investigate the mechanisms underlying technological innovation processes. We further identify the specific reasons why the potential of AI for creating new services and disrupting incumbents via digital startups has not been fully realised even in contexts with significant investment and support from public and private business development programmes. This field is still rapidly evolving, and thus, new areas for future research are also highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224000671/pdfft?md5=50fca5695910cba12b180324ec0abc7c&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224000671-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141164542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}