To advance the understanding and application of seismic resilience assessment for tunnels in complex geological conditions, this study investigates the longitudinal seismic fragility and resilience of shield tunnels crossing soil–rock interfaces. The seismic fragility of typical tunnels in soil–rock transition zones was analysed using the generalised response displacement method and incremental dynamic analysis. By combining fragility curves with economic loss and recovery models, the post-earthquake economic loss and seismic resilience of the tunnels were evaluated. Parametric studies were also conducted to examine the influence of key factors. The results show that the soil–rock interface amplifies seismic effects and significantly increases tunnel fragility, especially in the interface and soil zones. Near-fault pulse-type ground motions further raise the variability of seismic responses and reduce tunnel performance. Economic loss depends largely on fragility, with higher fragility leading to greater losses. Seismic resilience is influenced by both fragility and recovery capacity; greater fragility results in lower residual performance, longer recovery time and reduced resilience. Among the factors considered, the soil–rock stiffness ratio and tunnel burial depth have the strongest influence on economic loss and resilience. Under a peak ground acceleration (PGA) of 0.6 g, both the soil–rock stiffness ratio and the burial depth significantly influence system. A 7.3-fold increase in the former causes economic loss to expand by 20.46 times and the resilience index (R) to decrease by 0.0825. In contrast, a 20-m increase in the latter leads to a 7.38-fold expansion in economic loss and a 0.0004 reduction in R.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
