首页 > 最新文献

Rangeland Ecology & Management最新文献

英文 中文
Responses of Ground-Dwelling Arthropods to Long-Term Prescribed Fire Regimes in a Savanna-Protected Area 热带稀树草原保护区地栖节肢动物对长期规定火制度的反应
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.008
Ludzula Mukwevho , Mduduzi Ndlovu , Gerald Chikowore , Tatenda Dalu , Reyard Mutamiswa , Frank Chidawanyika

In savanna ecosystems, fire is common, yet little is known on the direct and long-term effects of prescribed burns on arthropod abundance, richness, diversity, and composition. To understand the impact of fire on arthropods at Kruger National Park (KNP), standardized pitfall traps and active searches were used to collect arthropods at unburnt, annually burnt, and triennially burnt plots of the long-term experimental burnt plots (EBPs). Abundance, richness, diversity, and assemblage composition of arthropods were compared across EBPs. Results showed that arthropods from the order Hymenoptera, particularly those in the family Formicidae, were the most abundant (76.4%), followed by Coleoptera (18.6%), Araneae (3%), Orthoptera (1%), and other small/less dominant orders (1%). However, the species richness of arthropods from Coleoptera was high (30.2%) compared with Formicidae (24.6%), Araneae (24.6%), and Orthoptera (4%). Abundance, richness, diversity, and assemblage composition of multitaxon and Formicidae were significantly different among EBPs. Although the abundance of multitaxon and Formicidae was significantly high at unburnt plot, species richness and diversity were low while the assemblage composition was unique at this plot compared with the annually and triennially burnt. Furthermore, the assemblage of arthropods in annually burnt EBP differed compared with those collected at unburnt and triennially burnt EBPs. We conclude that the frequency of prescribed fires improves the richness, diversity, and assemblage composition of arthropods with a significant reduction of abundances. Thus, fire can be used as a conservation tool for arthropods in the protected savanna of KNP.

在热带稀树草原生态系统中,火灾很常见,但人们对火灾对节肢动物数量、丰富度、多样性和组成的直接和长期影响知之甚少。为了了解火灾对克鲁格国家公园(KNP)节肢动物的影响,我们在长期试验性烧毁地块(EBPs)的未烧毁地块、每年烧毁地块和每三年烧毁地块使用标准化的坑式陷阱和主动搜寻法收集节肢动物。比较了不同 EBPs 中节肢动物的丰度、丰富度、多样性和集合组成。结果表明,膜翅目节肢动物数量最多(76.4%),尤其是蚁科节肢动物,其次是鞘翅目(18.6%)、鹤形目(3%)、直翅目(1%)和其他小目/次优势目(1%)。不过,鞘翅目节肢动物的物种丰富度较高(30.2%),而蚁形目(24.6%)、鹤形目(24.6%)和直翅目(4%)的物种丰富度较低。不同 EBPs 中多轴类群和姬蜂类群的丰度、丰富度、多样性和集合组成均有显著差异。虽然未烧毁地块的多轴类群和甲虫类群的丰度明显较高,但其物种丰富度和多样性较低,且与一年烧毁地块和三年烧毁地块相比,该地块的甲虫类群组成独特。此外,与未烧毁和三年烧毁一次的生态边界点相比,每年烧毁一次的生态边界点采集到的节肢动物群也有所不同。我们得出的结论是,规定火灾的频率可提高节肢动物的丰富度、多样性和组合组成,同时显著降低丰度。因此,火可以作为一种保护工具,用于保护九龙坡热带稀树草原中的节肢动物。
{"title":"Responses of Ground-Dwelling Arthropods to Long-Term Prescribed Fire Regimes in a Savanna-Protected Area","authors":"Ludzula Mukwevho ,&nbsp;Mduduzi Ndlovu ,&nbsp;Gerald Chikowore ,&nbsp;Tatenda Dalu ,&nbsp;Reyard Mutamiswa ,&nbsp;Frank Chidawanyika","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In savanna ecosystems, fire is common, yet little is known on the direct and long-term effects of prescribed burns on arthropod abundance, richness, diversity, and composition. To understand the impact of fire on arthropods at Kruger National Park (KNP), standardized pitfall traps and active searches were used to collect arthropods at unburnt, annually burnt, and triennially burnt plots of the long-term experimental burnt plots (EBPs). Abundance, richness, diversity, and assemblage composition of arthropods were compared across EBPs. Results showed that arthropods from the order Hymenoptera, particularly those in the family Formicidae, were the most abundant (76.4%), followed by Coleoptera (18.6%), Araneae (3%), Orthoptera (1%), and other small/less dominant orders (1%). However, the species richness of arthropods from Coleoptera was high (30.2%) compared with Formicidae (24.6%), Araneae (24.6%), and Orthoptera (4%). Abundance, richness, diversity, and assemblage composition of multitaxon and Formicidae were significantly different among EBPs. Although the abundance of multitaxon and Formicidae was significantly high at unburnt plot, species richness and diversity were low while the assemblage composition was unique at this plot compared with the annually and triennially burnt. Furthermore, the assemblage of arthropods in annually burnt EBP differed compared with those collected at unburnt and triennially burnt EBPs. We conclude that the frequency of prescribed fires improves the richness, diversity, and assemblage composition of arthropods with a significant reduction of abundances. Thus, fire can be used as a conservation tool for arthropods in the protected savanna of KNP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000605/pdfft?md5=4d8530208b69a17c738167c4b39665de&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000605-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140950516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Land Use/Cover Changes During 1992–2022 in the Yayo Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve, Southwestern Ethiopia 埃塞俄比亚西南部亚约咖啡森林生物圈保护区 1992-2022 年期间的土地利用/植被变化
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.004
Gemeda Terfassa Fida , Bernard Nuoleyeng Baatuuwie , Hamza Issifu

Land use and land cover change (LULC) play a critical role in influencing ecosystem processes, biodiversity, hydrology, and climate. In recent years, human activities have greatly influenced changes in LULC more than ever before. The Yayo Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve (YCFBR) is currently experiencing major effects from human activities, such as the spread of forest fires and the expansion of coffee plantations. The objective of this study is to quantify changes in LULC and their effects on ecological preservation within the YCFBR from 1992 to 2022. Landsat images from 1992, 2002, 2012, and 2022 were used for the study after the application of common image preprocessing techniques such as geometric and radiometric correction algorithms. A supervised image classification method using maximum likelihood algorithms was used to create LC maps consisting of six different LULC types in ERDAS Imagine software. The results revealed that throughout the study period, there was a consistent 80.81% of open forests that remained unchanged, while 79.08% of high forests stayed high forests. Similarly, the percentage of agricultural land that remained unchanged was 72.77%, while the percentage of built-up areas that remained the same was 62.84%. Grazing land experienced a conversion of about 58%, followed by high forest with (13.65%) conversion into open forest, whereas 22% of the agricultural land was converted to built-up area. About 62% of the YCFBR landscape persisted during the study period, while the total net change accounted for 59% of the total change in the area. The study's results can be used as valuable input for planning biodiversity management in the region, helping policymakers improve management strategies for LU, and potentially reducing pressure on high forest areas.

土地利用和土地覆被变化(LULC)在影响生态系统过程、生物多样性、水文和气候方面发挥着至关重要的作用。近年来,人类活动对土地利用和土地覆被变化的影响比以往任何时候都大。亚约咖啡森林生物圈保护区(YCFBR)目前正经受着人类活动的重大影响,如森林火灾的蔓延和咖啡种植园的扩张。本研究的目的是量化 1992 年至 2022 年 YCFBR 内土地利用、土地利用的变化及其对生态保护的影响。研究采用了 1992 年、2002 年、2012 年和 2022 年的陆地卫星图像,并应用了几何和辐射校正算法等常用图像预处理技术。在 ERDAS Imagine 软件中,使用最大似然算法的监督图像分类方法绘制了由六种不同 LULC 类型组成的 LC 地图。结果显示,在整个研究期间,80.81%的疏林保持不变,79.08%的高林保持为高林。同样,农田保持不变的比例为 72.77%,而建筑区保持不变的比例为 62.84%。放牧地的转化率约为 58%,其次是高森林(13.65%)转化为疏林地,而 22% 的农业用地转化为建筑密集区。在研究期间,约 62% 的青藏高原森林覆盖区景观得以保留,而总净变化占该地区总变化的 59%。研究结果可作为规划该地区生物多样性管理的宝贵资料,帮助政策制定者改进对LU的管理策略,并有可能减轻对高林区的压力。
{"title":"Land Use/Cover Changes During 1992–2022 in the Yayo Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve, Southwestern Ethiopia","authors":"Gemeda Terfassa Fida ,&nbsp;Bernard Nuoleyeng Baatuuwie ,&nbsp;Hamza Issifu","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Land use and land cover change (LULC) play a critical role in influencing ecosystem processes, biodiversity, hydrology, and climate. In recent years, human activities have greatly influenced changes in LULC more than ever before. The Yayo Coffee Forest Biosphere Reserve (YCFBR) is currently experiencing major effects from human activities, such as the spread of forest fires and the expansion of coffee plantations. The objective of this study is to quantify changes in LULC and their effects on ecological preservation within the YCFBR from 1992 to 2022. Landsat images from 1992, 2002, 2012, and 2022 were used for the study after the application of common image preprocessing techniques such as geometric and radiometric correction algorithms. A supervised image classification method using maximum likelihood algorithms was used to create LC maps consisting of six different LULC types in ERDAS Imagine software. The results revealed that throughout the study period, there was a consistent 80.81% of open forests that remained unchanged, while 79.08% of high forests stayed high forests. Similarly, the percentage of agricultural land that remained unchanged was 72.77%, while the percentage of built-up areas that remained the same was 62.84%. Grazing land experienced a conversion of about 58%, followed by high forest with (13.65%) conversion into open forest, whereas 22% of the agricultural land was converted to built-up area. About 62% of the YCFBR landscape persisted during the study period, while the total net change accounted for 59% of the total change in the area. The study's results can be used as valuable input for planning biodiversity management in the region, helping policymakers improve management strategies for LU, and potentially reducing pressure on high forest areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140918601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sagebrush Steppe Productivity, Environmental Complexity, and Grazing: Insights From Remote Sensing and Mixed-effect Modeling 鼠茅草干草原生产力、环境复杂性与放牧:遥感和混合效应建模的启示
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.001
Kaitlyn M. Reintsma , Mark Szczypinski , Steven W. Running , Shea P. Coons , Victoria J. Dreitz

Domestic livestock grazing is the primary land use across the planet, but the relationship between grazing and rangeland productivity is difficult to determine because it is influenced by a variety of ecological and management factors. Fine-scale environmental data available through remote sensing are increasingly used to understand land use changes, such as grazing. In this study, we assessed the relationship between a variety of grazing and rangeland productivity metrics while accounting for environmental complexity within the sagebrush steppe ecosystem of Montana. We created mixed-effect generalized linear models using remotely sensed productivity as response variables. Explanatory variables included management and field-based grazing data combined with remotely sensed abiotic and biotic environmental factors. We found point-level field measures of grazing (e.g., cow patties, percentage of dung in Daubenmire plots, and number of plants grazed) showed positive effects, especially on perennial forbs and grasses. Grazing measures at the pasture-level showed a small negative effect on annual forbs and grasses. Grazing metrics tended to have smaller covariate effects on rangeland productivity compared to environmental factors, and interaction effects between grazing and environmental factors were common. This study provides insight into the relationship between grazing and plant productivity in the sagebrush steppe rangeland of Montana and highlights the importance of assessing the effects of grazing using multiple scales while accounting for environmental complexity.

家畜放牧是地球上最主要的土地利用方式,但放牧与牧场生产力之间的关系却很难确定,因为它受到各种生态和管理因素的影响。通过遥感获得的精细尺度环境数据越来越多地被用于了解土地利用的变化,如放牧。在本研究中,我们评估了蒙大拿州鼠尾草干草原生态系统中各种放牧与牧场生产力指标之间的关系,同时考虑了环境的复杂性。我们使用遥感生产力作为响应变量,建立了混合效应广义线性模型。解释变量包括管理和实地放牧数据,以及遥感非生物和生物环境因素。我们发现,放牧的点级实地测量(如牛粪、道本米尔地块中的粪便百分比和放牧植物数量)显示出积极的影响,尤其是对多年生草本植物和禾本科植物。牧场层面的放牧指标对一年生草本植物和禾本科植物有轻微的负面影响。与环境因素相比,放牧指标对牧场生产力的协变量效应往往较小,放牧与环境因素之间的交互效应也很常见。这项研究深入探讨了蒙大拿州鼠尾草干草原牧场中放牧与植物生产力之间的关系,并强调了在考虑环境复杂性的同时使用多种尺度评估放牧影响的重要性。
{"title":"Sagebrush Steppe Productivity, Environmental Complexity, and Grazing: Insights From Remote Sensing and Mixed-effect Modeling","authors":"Kaitlyn M. Reintsma ,&nbsp;Mark Szczypinski ,&nbsp;Steven W. Running ,&nbsp;Shea P. Coons ,&nbsp;Victoria J. Dreitz","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Domestic livestock grazing is the primary land use across the planet, but the relationship between grazing and rangeland productivity is difficult to determine because it is influenced by a variety of ecological and management factors. Fine-scale environmental data available through remote sensing are increasingly used to understand land use changes, such as grazing. In this study, we assessed the relationship between a variety of grazing and rangeland productivity metrics while accounting for environmental complexity within the sagebrush steppe ecosystem of Montana. We created mixed-effect generalized linear models using remotely sensed productivity as response variables. Explanatory variables included management and field-based grazing data combined with remotely sensed abiotic and biotic environmental factors. We found point-level field measures of grazing (e.g., cow patties, percentage of dung in Daubenmire plots, and number of plants grazed) showed positive effects, especially on perennial forbs and grasses. Grazing measures at the pasture-level showed a small negative effect on annual forbs and grasses. Grazing metrics tended to have smaller covariate effects on rangeland productivity compared to environmental factors, and interaction effects between grazing and environmental factors were common. This study provides insight into the relationship between grazing and plant productivity in the sagebrush steppe rangeland of Montana and highlights the importance of assessing the effects of grazing using multiple scales while accounting for environmental complexity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000538/pdfft?md5=58fed079d41591ebb3e1ca6b3d22dd10&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000538-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140906450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Informing the Grazing Debate With Empirical Data on Black Wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) Patch Use 用黑角马(Connochaetes gnou)牧场利用的经验数据为放牧辩论提供信息
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.002
Steven McGregor , Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt , Mariska te Beest , Graham I.H. Kerley

High-density short-duration grazing (SDG) is widely suggested to increase productivity. Among various SDG practices, the most widespread and popular, “holistic grazing,” claims to mimic the movement patterns of wild African ungulate herds to improve rangeland health and promote biodiversity. However, this claim has rarely been empirically tested. Focusing on Karoo Escarpment Grasslands in the eastern Karoo, South Africa, we compared patch use patterns of black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) in a continuously grazed wildlife system with cattle paddock use on farms implementing SDG management in the same landscape. Camera trap data revealed heterogeneous wildebeest patch use over the 26-mo sampling period, with wildebeest consistently using some patches more intensely than others. Mean intensity of patch use by wildebeest varied with a factor of 10, from 0.05 LSU · ha−1 · day−1 to 0.51 LSU · ha−1 · day−1 across patches. The relative difference in mean intensity of paddock use among farms ranged across a similar magnitude from < 0.01 to 0.18 LSU · ha−1 · day−1 for least to most intensely grazed paddocks, respectively. Grazing durations in wildebeest patches ranged from 3-15 d (mean = 8 d), compared to the range of 3-60 d (mean = 18 d) for cattle. Intense grazing periods in wildebeest patches ranged from 0 to 2 d (mean = 1 d) and from 1 to 30 d (mean = 7 d) across cattle farms. The greatest difference was between rest intervals, lasting from 1 to 5 d on average across wildebeest patches, compared to 60–365 d across cattle farms. Our findings suggest that SDG systems prevalent in Karoo Escarpment Grasslands differ from the patch use patterns of black wildebeest in most aspects. These findings add to growing literature on grazing behavior of wild herbivores, and effectively contrasts these patterns with SDG cattle farming practices in the same landscape.

人们普遍认为,高密度短期放牧(SDG)可提高生产率。在各种短期放牧方法中,最普遍和最受欢迎的是 "整体放牧",它声称可以模仿非洲野生动物群的运动模式来改善牧场健康和促进生物多样性。然而,这种说法很少经过实证检验。我们以南非卡鲁东部的卡鲁陡崖草场为重点,比较了黑角羚(Connochaetes gnou)在连续放牧的野生动物系统中的补给利用模式,以及在同一地貌实施 SDG 管理的农场中的牛群围场利用模式。相机陷阱数据显示,在 26 个月的取样期间,黑角羚对斑块的使用情况各不相同,有些斑块的使用强度一直高于其他斑块。角马使用斑块的平均强度相差 10 倍,从 0.05 LSU - ha-1 - day-1 到 0.51 LSU - ha-1 - day-1。牧场之间围场平均使用强度的相对差异也类似,从放牧强度最低的围场到放牧强度最高的围场分别为 0.01 至 0.18 LSU - ha-1 - day-1。角马的放牧持续时间为 3-15 天(平均 = 8 天),而牛的放牧持续时间为 3-60 天(平均 = 18 天)。在各养牛场,角马斑块的密集放牧期为 0 至 2 天(平均 = 1 天),牛群的密集放牧期为 1 至 30 天(平均 = 7 天)。最大的差异在于休牧间隔,角马牧场的平均休牧间隔为 1 到 5 天,而养牛场的平均休牧间隔为 60 到 365 天。我们的研究结果表明,卡鲁濒危草原上普遍存在的 SDG 系统在大多数方面都与黑角羚的斑块利用模式不同。这些发现为越来越多有关野生食草动物放牧行为的文献增添了新的内容,并将这些模式与同一地貌的 SDG 养牛实践进行了有效对比。
{"title":"Informing the Grazing Debate With Empirical Data on Black Wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) Patch Use","authors":"Steven McGregor ,&nbsp;Joris P.G.M. Cromsigt ,&nbsp;Mariska te Beest ,&nbsp;Graham I.H. Kerley","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-density short-duration grazing (SDG) is widely suggested to increase productivity. Among various SDG practices, the most widespread and popular, “holistic grazing,” claims to mimic the movement patterns of wild African ungulate herds to improve rangeland health and promote biodiversity. However, this claim has rarely been empirically tested. Focusing on Karoo Escarpment Grasslands in the eastern Karoo, South Africa, we compared patch use patterns of black wildebeest (<em>Connochaetes gnou</em>) in a continuously grazed wildlife system with cattle paddock use on farms implementing SDG management in the same landscape. Camera trap data revealed heterogeneous wildebeest patch use over the 26-mo sampling period, with wildebeest consistently using some patches more intensely than others. Mean intensity of patch use by wildebeest varied with a factor of 10, from 0.05 LSU · ha<sup>−1</sup> · day<sup>−1</sup> to 0.51 LSU · ha<sup>−1</sup> · day<sup>−1</sup> across patches. The relative difference in mean intensity of paddock use among farms ranged across a similar magnitude from &lt; 0.01 to 0.18 LSU · ha<sup>−1</sup> · day<sup>−1</sup> for least to most intensely grazed paddocks, respectively. Grazing durations in wildebeest patches ranged from 3-15 d (mean = 8 d), compared to the range of 3-60 d (mean = 18 d) for cattle. Intense grazing periods in wildebeest patches ranged from 0 to 2 d (mean = 1 d) and from 1 to 30 d (mean = 7 d) across cattle farms. The greatest difference was between rest intervals, lasting from 1 to 5 d on average across wildebeest patches, compared to 60–365 d across cattle farms. Our findings suggest that SDG systems prevalent in Karoo Escarpment Grasslands differ from the patch use patterns of black wildebeest in most aspects. These findings add to growing literature on grazing behavior of wild herbivores, and effectively contrasts these patterns with SDG cattle farming practices in the same landscape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155074242400054X/pdfft?md5=bd7e5d34243166eb774e2131c14eb8f3&pid=1-s2.0-S155074242400054X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140906448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intercropping of Tropical Grassland and Pigeon Pea: Impact on Microclimate, Soil Water, and Forage Production 热带草地与鸽子豆间作:对小气候、土壤水分和牧草产量的影响
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.005
José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane , Patrícia Perondi Anchão de Oliveira , André de Faria Pedroso , Willian Lucas Bonani , Cristiam Bosi , Henrique Bauab Brunetti , Rolando Pasquini Neto , Althieres José Furtado , Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues

Although several strategies can be used for pasture recovery, pasture degradation remains an issue in Brazilian cattle raising. The use of shrub legumes can change the environment (microclimate and water consumption) and productive potential of the pasture. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two pasture recovery strategies on the microclimate, soil water dynamics, and forage accumulation of tropical pastures. The research was conducted between 2020 and 2022 in signalgrass (Urochloa [syn. Brachiaria] decumbens Stapf cv. Basilisk) pastures managed under continuous and variable stocking rate throughout the experimental period in São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Three production systems were assessed: 1) degraded pasture without N fertilization (DEG); 2) recovered pasture with application of 200 kg N-urea ha−1 yr−1 (REC); and 3) recovered pasture by intercropping with pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp. cv. BRS Mandarim) (MIX). Soil moisture in the 0–60 cm layer and microclimate, which included photosynthetically active radiation and the animal thermal comfort index, were assessed. The vegetative and productive characteristics of pastures, as well as the total mass production of the production systems, were also evaluated. Overall, intercropping pigeon pea plants with tropical pasture did not significantly affect the soil water content or the animal thermal comfort index. However, it did alter the transmission of photosynthetically active solar radiation to the pasture (0%‒65%) and decreased wind speed (0%‒60%). During the 2 yr, the pigeon pea exhibited a great forage accumulation potential (12 615 kg·ha−1·yr−1). Additionally, pigeon pea provided high-quality forage available during the dry season. Forage accumulation increased in both pasture recovery strategies (REC and MIX), with a significantly greater amount of crude protein (CP) content in the MIX. Intercropping tropical pastures with pigeon pea can be used as a strategy for pasture recovery and dry season forage supplementation.

虽然可以采用多种策略来恢复草场,但草场退化仍然是巴西养牛业的一个问题。灌木豆科植物的使用会改变牧场的环境(小气候和耗水量)和生产潜力。因此,本研究旨在评估两种牧场恢复策略对热带牧场小气候、土壤水动态和饲料积累的影响。研究于 2020 年至 2022 年期间在巴西南太平洋圣卡洛斯市的信号草(Urochloa [syn. Brachiaria] decumbens Stapf cv. Basilisk)牧场进行,在整个实验期间,牧场采用连续和可变放牧率管理。对三种生产系统进行了评估:1)不施氮肥的退化牧场(DEG);2)每年每公顷施用 200 千克尿素的复原牧场(REC);3)与豌豆(Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.对 0-60 厘米土层的土壤湿度和小气候(包括光合有效辐射和动物热舒适指数)进行了评估。此外,还评估了牧草的植被和生产特性,以及生产系统的总产量。总体而言,将豌豆与热带牧草间作不会对土壤含水量或动物热舒适指数产生显著影响。不过,它确实改变了光合有效太阳辐射向牧草的传输(0%-65%),并降低了风速(0%-60%)。在这两年中,鸽子豆表现出了巨大的饲料积累潜力(12 615 kg-公顷-1-年-1)。此外,豌豆还能在旱季提供优质牧草。两种牧草恢复策略(REC 和 MIX)都能增加牧草积累,其中 MIX 的粗蛋白(CP)含量明显更高。热带牧场与豌豆间作可作为牧场恢复和旱季饲料补充的一种策略。
{"title":"Intercropping of Tropical Grassland and Pigeon Pea: Impact on Microclimate, Soil Water, and Forage Production","authors":"José Ricardo Macedo Pezzopane ,&nbsp;Patrícia Perondi Anchão de Oliveira ,&nbsp;André de Faria Pedroso ,&nbsp;Willian Lucas Bonani ,&nbsp;Cristiam Bosi ,&nbsp;Henrique Bauab Brunetti ,&nbsp;Rolando Pasquini Neto ,&nbsp;Althieres José Furtado ,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although several strategies can be used for pasture recovery, pasture degradation remains an issue in Brazilian cattle raising. The use of shrub legumes can change the environment (microclimate and water consumption) and productive potential of the pasture. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two pasture recovery strategies on the microclimate, soil water dynamics, and forage accumulation of tropical pastures. The research was conducted between 2020 and 2022 in signalgrass (<em>Urochloa</em> [syn. <em>Brachiaria</em>] <em>decumbens</em> Stapf cv. Basilisk) pastures managed under continuous and variable stocking rate throughout the experimental period in São Carlos, SP, Brazil. Three production systems were assessed: 1) degraded pasture without N fertilization (DEG); 2) recovered pasture with application of 200 kg N-urea ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (REC); and 3) recovered pasture by intercropping with pigeon pea (<em>Cajanus cajan</em> L. Millsp. cv. BRS Mandarim) (MIX). Soil moisture in the 0–60 cm layer and microclimate, which included photosynthetically active radiation and the animal thermal comfort index, were assessed. The vegetative and productive characteristics of pastures, as well as the total mass production of the production systems, were also evaluated. Overall, intercropping pigeon pea plants with tropical pasture did not significantly affect the soil water content or the animal thermal comfort index. However, it did alter the transmission of photosynthetically active solar radiation to the pasture (0%‒65%) and decreased wind speed (0%‒60%). During the 2 yr, the pigeon pea exhibited a great forage accumulation potential (12 615 kg·ha<sup>−1</sup>·yr<sup>−1</sup>). Additionally, pigeon pea provided high-quality forage available during the dry season. Forage accumulation increased in both pasture recovery strategies (REC and MIX), with a significantly greater amount of crude protein (CP) content in the MIX. Intercropping tropical pastures with pigeon pea can be used as a strategy for pasture recovery and dry season forage supplementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140906451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum to “Evaluating the Efficacy of Targeted Cattle Grazing for Fuel Break Creation and Maintenance.” [Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2023 89, 69–86] 对 "评估有针对性地放牧牛群对建立和维护防火带的功效 "的勘误。[牧场生态与管理,2023 年 89 期,69-86 页]
IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.006
{"title":"Erratum to “Evaluating the Efficacy of Targeted Cattle Grazing for Fuel Break Creation and Maintenance.” [Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2023 89, 69–86]","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141032953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Board/Journal Info 编辑委员会/期刊信息
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/S1550-7424(24)00063-0
{"title":"Editorial Board/Journal Info","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1550-7424(24)00063-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1550-7424(24)00063-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000630/pdfft?md5=8260df4fe888497a72077292e93166db&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000630-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140918997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “Investigating the long-term effect of livestock grazing, slope-location, and sampling-depth on soil moisture characteristic curves,” [Rangeland Ecology & Management Volume 93, March 2024, Pages 123-135] 牧场生态与管理》第 93 卷,2024 年 3 月,第 123-135 页,"调查牲畜放牧、坡地位置和取样深度对土壤水分特征曲线的长期影响 "的更正
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.009
Eisa Ebrahimi
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Investigating the long-term effect of livestock grazing, slope-location, and sampling-depth on soil moisture characteristic curves,” [Rangeland Ecology & Management Volume 93, March 2024, Pages 123-135]","authors":"Eisa Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000496/pdfft?md5=264700755db484cdd3f8fe40c457158c&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000496-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140643763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Variable Weather on Vegetation Dynamics and Eddy Fluxes in Tallgrass Prairie 多变天气对高草草原植被动态和涡流的影响
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.011
Pradeep Wagle, Brian K. Northup, Corey Moffet, Stacey A. Gunter

Tallgrass prairie is one of the major ecosystems in the Southern Great Plains of the United States of America (USA). We investigated the impact of diverse weather conditions on the vegetation dynamics obtained through satellite remote sensing and the dynamics of carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes, evapotranspiration (ET), and ecosystem water use efficiency (EWUE) obtained through eddy covariance (EC) in a native tallgrass prairie pasture in central Oklahoma, USA. The study was conducted from 2019 to 2022, considering varying growing conditions. Daily peak net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE), gross primary production (GPP), and ET were −8.7 g C m−2, 15.1 g C m−2, and 5.9 mm, respectively. Dynamics of eddy fluxes aligned with the dynamics of vegetation, indicating the accuracy and reliability of satellite-based vegetation indices in tallgrass prairie. Both CO2 fluxes and ET rates showed little variation over the years during the non-growing season (November to March). However, eddy fluxes exhibited diverse patterns during growing seasons. During the regrowth phase after the hay harvest, the differences in eddy fluxes were particularly substantial due to large variations in late-season rainfall. Consequently, the strength and duration of carbon gain during growing seasons varied substantially by year (i.e., carbon sink for 6 mo in 2019 vs. 2 mo in 2022). The highly variable magnitude of EWUE over the years illustrates that EWUE is not a constant property of this prairie ecosystem. A greater reduction in GPP than ET during dry years led to reduced EWUE. Strong relationships between eddy fluxes and vegetation indices suggest that CO2 fluxes and ET can be estimated from satellite imagery alone for tallgrass prairie across large spatial scales. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the carbon and water cycles of tallgrass prairie and the impacts of environmental drivers and disturbances on their function.

高草草原是美利坚合众国(美国)南部大平原的主要生态系统之一。我们在美国俄克拉荷马州中部的一个原生高草草原牧场调查了不同天气条件对卫星遥感获得的植被动态以及通过涡度协方差(EC)获得的二氧化碳(CO2)通量、蒸散量(ET)和生态系统水分利用效率(EWUE)动态的影响。该研究于 2019 年至 2022 年进行,考虑了不同的生长条件。生态系统二氧化碳净交换量(NEE)、总初级生产力(GPP)和蒸散发的日峰值分别为-8.7 g C m-2、15.1 g C m-2和5.9 mm。涡度通量的动态与植被的动态一致,表明基于卫星的高草草原植被指数是准确可靠的。在非生长季节(11 月至次年 3 月),二氧化碳通量和蒸散发率多年来变化不大。然而,涡通量在生长季节表现出不同的模式。在干草收割后的重新生长阶段,由于季末降雨量变化较大,涡通量的差异尤其明显。因此,不同年份生长季节碳增量的强度和持续时间也大不相同(例如,2019 年的碳汇持续时间为 6 个月,而 2022 年为 2 个月)。EWUE 在不同年份的变化幅度很大,这说明 EWUE 并非该草原生态系统的恒定属性。在干旱年份,GPP 的减少幅度大于蒸散发,导致 EWUE 减少。涡度通量与植被指数之间的密切关系表明,仅凭卫星图像就能估算出大空间尺度高草草原的二氧化碳通量和蒸散发。总之,这项研究为了解高草草原的碳循环和水循环以及环境驱动因素和干扰对其功能的影响提供了宝贵的见解。
{"title":"Impact of Variable Weather on Vegetation Dynamics and Eddy Fluxes in Tallgrass Prairie","authors":"Pradeep Wagle,&nbsp;Brian K. Northup,&nbsp;Corey Moffet,&nbsp;Stacey A. Gunter","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tallgrass prairie is one of the major ecosystems in the Southern Great Plains of the United States of America (USA). We investigated the impact of diverse weather conditions on the vegetation dynamics obtained through satellite remote sensing and the dynamics of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) fluxes, evapotranspiration (ET), and ecosystem water use efficiency (EWUE) obtained through eddy covariance (EC) in a native tallgrass prairie pasture in central Oklahoma, USA. The study was conducted from 2019 to 2022, considering varying growing conditions. Daily peak net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (NEE), gross primary production (GPP), and ET were −8.7 g C m<sup>−2</sup>, 15.1 g C m<sup>−2</sup>, and 5.9 mm, respectively. Dynamics of eddy fluxes aligned with the dynamics of vegetation, indicating the accuracy and reliability of satellite-based vegetation indices in tallgrass prairie. Both CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and ET rates showed little variation over the years during the non-growing season (November to March). However, eddy fluxes exhibited diverse patterns during growing seasons. During the regrowth phase after the hay harvest, the differences in eddy fluxes were particularly substantial due to large variations in late-season rainfall. Consequently, the strength and duration of carbon gain during growing seasons varied substantially by year (i.e., carbon sink for 6 mo in 2019 vs. 2 mo in 2022). The highly variable magnitude of EWUE over the years illustrates that EWUE is not a constant property of this prairie ecosystem. A greater reduction in GPP than ET during dry years led to reduced EWUE. Strong relationships between eddy fluxes and vegetation indices suggest that CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and ET can be estimated from satellite imagery alone for tallgrass prairie across large spatial scales. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the carbon and water cycles of tallgrass prairie and the impacts of environmental drivers and disturbances on their function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140618764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What's in a Name? Standardizing Terminology for the Enhancement of Research, Extension, and Industry Applications of Virtual Fence Use on Grazing Livestock 名称有何意义?规范术语,加强虚拟围栏在放牧牲畜上的研究、推广和行业应用
IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.004
Krista A. Ehlert , Jameson Brennan , Joslyn Beard , Ryan Reuter , Hector Menendez , Logan Vandermark , Mitchell Stephenson , Dana Hoag , Paul Meiman , Rory C. O'Connor , Sarah Noelle

Virtual fence (VF) is the use of a global positioning system (GPS) to dictate where on the landscape livestock can graze without relying on traditional physical fence such as barbed wire. The recent acceleration in the development and adoption of VF technology for grazing management has been characterized by the evolution of divergent terminology. Different research and commercial entities have adopted terms and definitions independently. Some terms and definitions are inherently problematic, while others are more aligned, and the simple fact that differences exist contributes to confusion in communication among scientists, producers, land managers, manufacturers, government agencies, and the public. In this paper, we propose a standard terminology determined during a 2-d in-service workshop at the annual meeting of the Society of Rangeland Management in February 2023. Standard terminology will aid in efficient and effective communication among all entities and interested parties.

虚拟围栏(VF)是指利用全球定位系统(GPS)来确定牲畜在地形上的放牧位置,而无需依赖传统的有形围栏(如铁丝网)。最近,虚拟围栏技术在放牧管理方面的开发和采用速度加快,其特点是术语的演变各不相同。不同的研究和商业实体各自采用不同的术语和定义。一些术语和定义本身就存在问题,而另一些术语和定义则更加一致,存在差异这一简单事实造成了科学家、生产者、土地管理者、制造商、政府机构和公众之间交流的混乱。在本文中,我们提出了一个标准术语,该术语是在 2023 年 2 月举行的牧场管理学会年会上的 2-D 在岗研讨会上确定的。标准术语将有助于所有实体和相关方之间进行高效、有效的交流。
{"title":"What's in a Name? Standardizing Terminology for the Enhancement of Research, Extension, and Industry Applications of Virtual Fence Use on Grazing Livestock","authors":"Krista A. Ehlert ,&nbsp;Jameson Brennan ,&nbsp;Joslyn Beard ,&nbsp;Ryan Reuter ,&nbsp;Hector Menendez ,&nbsp;Logan Vandermark ,&nbsp;Mitchell Stephenson ,&nbsp;Dana Hoag ,&nbsp;Paul Meiman ,&nbsp;Rory C. O'Connor ,&nbsp;Sarah Noelle","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.03.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Virtual fence (VF) is the use of a global positioning system (GPS) to dictate where on the landscape livestock can graze without relying on traditional physical fence such as barbed wire. The recent acceleration in the development and adoption of VF technology for grazing management has been characterized by the evolution of divergent terminology. Different research and commercial entities have adopted terms and definitions independently. Some terms and definitions are inherently problematic, while others are more aligned, and the simple fact that differences exist contributes to confusion in communication among scientists, producers, land managers, manufacturers, government agencies, and the public. In this paper, we propose a standard terminology determined during a 2-d in-service workshop at the annual meeting of the Society of Rangeland Management in February 2023. Standard terminology will aid in efficient and effective communication among all entities and interested parties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000459/pdfft?md5=a8f355fed5df2378b81a9b1047835792&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000459-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140557416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1