首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Initial Experience with Disposable Single-Use Cholangioscope During Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration. 在腹腔镜胆总管探查术中使用一次性单次使用胆道镜的初步经验
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0451
Antoinette Hu, Nina Eng, Eric M Pauli, Jerome Lyn-Sue, Randy Haluck, Joshua S Winder

Introduction: For patients with choledocholithiasis, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is more cost effective than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and results in shorter hospital length of stay. As LCBDE can be technically challenging to perform, utilizing a disposable single-use cholangioscope (DSUC) for LCBDE through a cystic ductotomy has several advantages, such as potentially avoiding a choledochotomy and expanding access to cholangioscopes as a DSUC is disposable and does not require infrastructure for cleaning or maintenance. Methods: An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review from 2021 to 2023 was conducted for patients who underwent concurrent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and LCBDE with a DSUC (SpyGlass™ Discover, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) for the management of choledocholithiasis diagnosed either preoperatively or during intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). Primary endpoint was successful clearance of biliary duct stones. Results: Twelve patients with a mean age of 55.3 years (SD ±13.9) and mean body mass index of 33.8 (SD ±10.8) were found to have filling defects on IOC for LC and underwent LCBDE with DSUC. Of these, 10 patients had stones. Complete stone clearance was achieved in all 10 patients with various stone extraction maneuvers. The mean operative time was 189 minutes (SD ±63.6) and mean hospital length of stay postoperatively was 1 day (SD ±.8). Mean length of follow-up postoperatively was 26.9 (SD ±16.0) days. There were no intraoperative complications, no need for repeat procedures, and only one postoperative complication involving a superficial surgical site infection requiring oral antibiotics. Conclusions: LCBDE with a DSUC is safe and efficacious for clearing stones and identifying pathology of the CBD. Familiarity with this device is especially useful for surgeons who want to simultaneously manage choledocholithiasis at the same time as cholecystectomy to reduce hospital stay and overall cost.

简介:对于胆总管结石患者,腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)比内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)更具成本效益,住院时间也更短。由于 LCBDE 的实施在技术上具有挑战性,因此利用一次性胆道镜 (DSUC) 通过胆囊管切开术进行 LCBDE 有几个优点,如可能避免胆总管切开术,并且由于 DSUC 是一次性的,不需要清洁或维护基础设施,因此扩大了胆道镜的使用范围。方法:对 2021 年至 2023 年期间接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术 (LC) 和使用 DSUC(SpyGlass™ Discover,波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州纳蒂克市)治疗术前或术中胆管造影 (IOC) 诊断出的胆总管结石的患者进行了一项经 IRB 批准的回顾性病历审查。主要终点是成功清除胆管结石。结果:12名患者的平均年龄为55.3岁(SD±13.9),平均体重指数为33.8(SD±10.8),他们在LC术中胆管造影(IOC)中被发现有充盈缺损,并接受了LCBDE和DSUC手术。其中 10 名患者有结石。通过各种取石操作,所有 10 名患者都完全清除了结石。平均手术时间为 189 分钟(SD ±63.6),术后平均住院时间为 1 天(SD ±.8)。术后平均随访时间为 26.9 天(标准差 ±16.0)。术中无并发症,无需重复手术,术后仅有一次浅表手术部位感染并发症,需要口服抗生素。结论:使用 DSUC 的 LCBDE 在清除结石和识别 CBD 病变方面既安全又有效。对于希望在进行胆囊切除术的同时处理胆总管结石以减少住院时间和总体费用的外科医生来说,熟悉这种设备尤其有用。
{"title":"Initial Experience with Disposable Single-Use Cholangioscope During Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.","authors":"Antoinette Hu, Nina Eng, Eric M Pauli, Jerome Lyn-Sue, Randy Haluck, Joshua S Winder","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0451","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2023.0451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> For patients with choledocholithiasis, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is more cost effective than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and results in shorter hospital length of stay. As LCBDE can be technically challenging to perform, utilizing a disposable single-use cholangioscope (DSUC) for LCBDE through a cystic ductotomy has several advantages, such as potentially avoiding a choledochotomy and expanding access to cholangioscopes as a DSUC is disposable and does not require infrastructure for cleaning or maintenance. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review from 2021 to 2023 was conducted for patients who underwent concurrent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and LCBDE with a DSUC (SpyGlass™ Discover, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) for the management of choledocholithiasis diagnosed either preoperatively or during intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). Primary endpoint was successful clearance of biliary duct stones. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twelve patients with a mean age of 55.3 years (SD ±13.9) and mean body mass index of 33.8 (SD ±10.8) were found to have filling defects on IOC for LC and underwent LCBDE with DSUC. Of these, 10 patients had stones. Complete stone clearance was achieved in all 10 patients with various stone extraction maneuvers. The mean operative time was 189 minutes (SD ±63.6) and mean hospital length of stay postoperatively was 1 day (SD ±.8). Mean length of follow-up postoperatively was 26.9 (SD ±16.0) days. There were no intraoperative complications, no need for repeat procedures, and only one postoperative complication involving a superficial surgical site infection requiring oral antibiotics. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> LCBDE with a DSUC is safe and efficacious for clearing stones and identifying pathology of the CBD. Familiarity with this device is especially useful for surgeons who want to simultaneously manage choledocholithiasis at the same time as cholecystectomy to reduce hospital stay and overall cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"877-881"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of ICG-Guided Fluorescent Mode in Boosting the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. ICG 引导荧光模式在促进腹腔镜胆囊切除术学习曲线中的作用。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0056
Tao Wang,Le Xiao,Peng Lu,Chong Wen,Shu-Ting Zhang,Hao Luo
Background: The most common therapy for gallstones is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). How to help young residents avoid bile duct injuries (BDI) during surgery and grasp LC seems to be a paradox. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 145 cases of LC operated by two residents under indocyanine green (ICG)-guided mode or normal LC procedures to illustrate the role of ICG mode in boosting the LC learning curve. The clinic data were analyzed by logistic regression, receiver operator curve tests, Cumulative Sum (CUSUM), and Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis. Results: The operation failure rate is similar. However, operation time under ICG mode is shorter than that under normal mode. The peak at the 49th case represented the normal resident's complete mastery of the surgery, while the peak point of ICG mode appeared at the 36th case in the fitting curve. The most significant cumulative risk (peak point) of operation failure of LC was at the 35th case in ICG LC mode, while it appeared in the 49th in normal LC mode. Conclusions: Owing to the advantage of real-time imaging and the stable success rate of cholangiography, ICG-guided LC helps residents shorten the operation time, boost the learning curve, and manage to control the operation failure rate.
背景:胆结石最常见的治疗方法是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。如何帮助年轻住院医师在手术过程中避免胆管损伤(BDI)并掌握腹腔镜胆囊切除术似乎是一个难题。方法:我们回顾性分析了两位住院医师在吲哚青绿(ICG)引导模式下或普通LC手术中操作的145例LC病例,以说明ICG模式在促进LC学习曲线中的作用。临床数据通过逻辑回归、接收者操作曲线测试、累积总和(CUSUM)和风险调整累积总和(RA-CUSUM)分析进行分析。结果手术失败率相似。但是,ICG 模式下的手术时间比普通模式下的手术时间短。在拟合曲线中,第 49 例的峰值代表普通住院医师完全掌握了手术,而 ICG 模式的峰值点出现在第 36 例。在 ICG LC 模式下,LC 手术失败的最大累积风险(峰值点)出现在第 35 个病例,而在普通 LC 模式下,峰值点出现在第 49 个病例。结论ICG引导下胆管造影具有实时成像的优势和稳定的成功率,有助于住院医师缩短手术时间,提高学习曲线,控制手术失败率。
{"title":"The Role of ICG-Guided Fluorescent Mode in Boosting the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Tao Wang,Le Xiao,Peng Lu,Chong Wen,Shu-Ting Zhang,Hao Luo","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0056","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The most common therapy for gallstones is laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). How to help young residents avoid bile duct injuries (BDI) during surgery and grasp LC seems to be a paradox. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 145 cases of LC operated by two residents under indocyanine green (ICG)-guided mode or normal LC procedures to illustrate the role of ICG mode in boosting the LC learning curve. The clinic data were analyzed by logistic regression, receiver operator curve tests, Cumulative Sum (CUSUM), and Risk-Adjusted Cumulative Sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis. Results: The operation failure rate is similar. However, operation time under ICG mode is shorter than that under normal mode. The peak at the 49th case represented the normal resident's complete mastery of the surgery, while the peak point of ICG mode appeared at the 36th case in the fitting curve. The most significant cumulative risk (peak point) of operation failure of LC was at the 35th case in ICG LC mode, while it appeared in the 49th in normal LC mode. Conclusions: Owing to the advantage of real-time imaging and the stable success rate of cholangiography, ICG-guided LC helps residents shorten the operation time, boost the learning curve, and manage to control the operation failure rate.","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Adrenalectomy with the Aid of Intracavitary Retractors and Multiport Laparoendoscopic Adrenalectomy. 借助腔内牵引器的腹腔镜单点肾上腺切除术与多孔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的比较。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0292
Wei Liu,Haibin Hu,Fuyang Liu,Yong Wei,Rongjiang Jiang,Luming Shen,Qingyi Zhu
Objective: To evaluate the operative outcome of the use of intracavitary retractors in transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) adrenalectomy in comparison with the conventional multiport laparoendoscopic procedure. Methods: Between July 2021 and December 2023, 34 patients underwent transumbilical LESS adrenalectomy with intracavitary retractors, while 47 patients underwent conventional multiport laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Comprehensive data were compared, including demographics, intraoperative outcomes, perioperative complications, postoperative visual analog pain scale score, analgesic requirement, and short-term measures of convalescence. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. All procedures were successfully completed without additional access or open conversion. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss for LESS adrenalectomy were comparable with multiport adrenalectomy. The LESS group had significantly shorter incision length (3.07 cm versus 5.16 cm, P < .01), lower postoperative pain scores (3.29 versus 4.91, P < .01), less analgesic drug use (29% versus 53%, P = .03), and better cosmetic scores (9.29 versus 7.28, P < .01). No significant differences were observed in time to resume oral intake, time to ambulation, or postoperative hospital stay. Complication rates were similar between the groups. Conclusion: The utilization of intracavitary retractors in transumbilical LESS adrenalectomy has demonstrated feasibility, effectiveness, and the potential to reduce technical complexities with satisfactory cosmetic effects. This technique enhances visualization of the surgical field without the need for extra ports.
目的评估经脐腹腔镜单部位(LESS)肾上腺切除术中使用腔内牵开器与传统多孔腹腔镜手术相比的手术效果。方法:2021 年 7 月至 2023 年 12 月期间,34 名患者接受了使用腔内牵引器的经脐 LESS 肾上腺切除术,47 名患者接受了传统的多孔腹腔镜肾上腺切除术。两组患者的综合数据进行了比较,包括人口统计学、术中结果、围手术期并发症、术后视觉模拟疼痛量表评分、镇痛剂需求以及短期疗养措施。结果两组患者的基线特征相似。所有手术均顺利完成,无额外入路或开放式转换。LESS肾上腺切除术的平均手术时间和估计失血量与多孔肾上腺切除术相当。LESS组的切口长度明显较短(3.07厘米对5.16厘米,P < .01),术后疼痛评分较低(3.29分对4.91分,P < .01),镇痛药物使用较少(29%对53%,P = .03),美容评分较好(9.29分对7.28分,P < .01)。在恢复口服时间、下地活动时间或术后住院时间方面没有观察到明显差异。两组的并发症发生率相似。结论:在经脐肾上腺切除术中使用腔内牵开器证明了其可行性、有效性和降低技术复杂性的潜力,并能达到令人满意的美容效果。该技术可提高手术视野的可视性,而无需额外的端口。
{"title":"Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Adrenalectomy with the Aid of Intracavitary Retractors and Multiport Laparoendoscopic Adrenalectomy.","authors":"Wei Liu,Haibin Hu,Fuyang Liu,Yong Wei,Rongjiang Jiang,Luming Shen,Qingyi Zhu","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0292","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the operative outcome of the use of intracavitary retractors in transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) adrenalectomy in comparison with the conventional multiport laparoendoscopic procedure. Methods: Between July 2021 and December 2023, 34 patients underwent transumbilical LESS adrenalectomy with intracavitary retractors, while 47 patients underwent conventional multiport laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Comprehensive data were compared, including demographics, intraoperative outcomes, perioperative complications, postoperative visual analog pain scale score, analgesic requirement, and short-term measures of convalescence. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. All procedures were successfully completed without additional access or open conversion. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss for LESS adrenalectomy were comparable with multiport adrenalectomy. The LESS group had significantly shorter incision length (3.07 cm versus 5.16 cm, P < .01), lower postoperative pain scores (3.29 versus 4.91, P < .01), less analgesic drug use (29% versus 53%, P = .03), and better cosmetic scores (9.29 versus 7.28, P < .01). No significant differences were observed in time to resume oral intake, time to ambulation, or postoperative hospital stay. Complication rates were similar between the groups. Conclusion: The utilization of intracavitary retractors in transumbilical LESS adrenalectomy has demonstrated feasibility, effectiveness, and the potential to reduce technical complexities with satisfactory cosmetic effects. This technique enhances visualization of the surgical field without the need for extra ports.","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Primary Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Study of Weight Loss Trajectories and Perioperative Outcomes. COVID-19 封锁对初级减肥手术的影响:减肥轨迹和围手术期结果的比较研究。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0241
Juan S Barajas-Gamboa,Mohammed Sakib Ihsan Khan,Gustavo Romero-Velez,Jerry T Dang,Gabriel Diaz Del Gobbo,Mohammed Abdallah,Juan Pablo Pantoja,Javed Raza,Carlos Abril,Alfredo D Guerron,Terrence Lee-St John,Ricard Corcelles,Matthew Kroh,John H Rodriguez
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns led to substantial changes in health-related behaviors and deferred elective surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on weight loss trajectories (WLT) and perioperative outcomes in primary bariatric surgery at a single tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery immediately prior to the enforced lockdown (During-Lockdown Group, DLG) were compared with historical controls who underwent surgery before the lockdown (Before-Lockdown Group, BLG). WLT were estimated using a random intercept mixed-effects model with repeated measures. Cross-sectional group differences at 3- and 6-months post-surgery were examined. Perioperative outcomes were also analyzed. Results: A total of 273 patients were included (133 BLG, 140 DLG). The adjusted average weight decreased in both groups over time at different levels. The expected difference in weight between BLG and DLG at 3-months was 1.06 kg (P = .013) and at 6-months was .04 kg (P = .920), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, emergency department visits, re-admission rates, re-operation rates, or mortality. Conclusions: This study suggests that bariatric procedures performed before the COVID-19 lockdown were effective and safe. Despite a statistically significant difference in weight between groups at 3- and 6-months post-surgery, the difference was small and unlikely to be clinically significant. Short-term outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Further investigation is warranted to assess the impact of lifestyle changes during the lockdown on long-term bariatric surgery outcomes.
背景:COVID-19 大流行和随后的封锁导致了健康相关行为的重大改变和择期手术的推迟。本研究旨在评估 COVID-19 封锁对一家三级转诊中心初级减肥手术的减重轨迹 (WLT) 和围手术期结果的影响。方法将在强制封锁前接受初级减肥手术的患者(封锁期间组,DLG)与在封锁前接受手术的历史对照组(封锁前组,BLG)进行比较。WLT 采用随机截距重复测量混合效应模型进行估计。检查了手术后 3 个月和 6 个月的横截面组间差异。同时还分析了围手术期的结果。结果:共纳入 273 名患者(133 名 BLG,140 名 DLG)。随着时间的推移,两组患者调整后的平均体重均有不同程度的下降。BLG 和 DLG 在 3 个月时的预期体重差异分别为 1.06 千克(P = .013)和 0.04 千克(P = .920)。术后并发症、急诊就诊率、再次入院率、再次手术率或死亡率在统计学上没有明显差异。结论:这项研究表明,在 COVID-19 封锁前进行的减肥手术是有效和安全的。尽管两组患者在术后 3 个月和 6 个月时的体重在统计学上有显著差异,但差异很小,不太可能具有临床意义。两组的短期疗效相当。有必要进行进一步调查,以评估禁食期间改变生活方式对长期减肥手术效果的影响。
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Primary Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Study of Weight Loss Trajectories and Perioperative Outcomes.","authors":"Juan S Barajas-Gamboa,Mohammed Sakib Ihsan Khan,Gustavo Romero-Velez,Jerry T Dang,Gabriel Diaz Del Gobbo,Mohammed Abdallah,Juan Pablo Pantoja,Javed Raza,Carlos Abril,Alfredo D Guerron,Terrence Lee-St John,Ricard Corcelles,Matthew Kroh,John H Rodriguez","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0241","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns led to substantial changes in health-related behaviors and deferred elective surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on weight loss trajectories (WLT) and perioperative outcomes in primary bariatric surgery at a single tertiary referral center. Methods: Patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery immediately prior to the enforced lockdown (During-Lockdown Group, DLG) were compared with historical controls who underwent surgery before the lockdown (Before-Lockdown Group, BLG). WLT were estimated using a random intercept mixed-effects model with repeated measures. Cross-sectional group differences at 3- and 6-months post-surgery were examined. Perioperative outcomes were also analyzed. Results: A total of 273 patients were included (133 BLG, 140 DLG). The adjusted average weight decreased in both groups over time at different levels. The expected difference in weight between BLG and DLG at 3-months was 1.06 kg (P = .013) and at 6-months was .04 kg (P = .920), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, emergency department visits, re-admission rates, re-operation rates, or mortality. Conclusions: This study suggests that bariatric procedures performed before the COVID-19 lockdown were effective and safe. Despite a statistically significant difference in weight between groups at 3- and 6-months post-surgery, the difference was small and unlikely to be clinically significant. Short-term outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Further investigation is warranted to assess the impact of lifestyle changes during the lockdown on long-term bariatric surgery outcomes.","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of External Distractions on Simulated Laparoscopic Performance. 外部干扰对模拟腹腔镜操作的影响
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0280
Isabel Ingram,Mark A Hughes
Background: Surgeons are exposed to unavoidable distractions while operating. Distractions can cause stress, and stress can impair cognition and motor skills to the detriment of surgeon performance. This study assessed the impact of distractions on surgeon stress levels and surgeon performance during simulated laparoscopic tasks. Methods: Twelve surgical trainees completed a peg-thread transfer task three times on a laparoscopic simulator in a neutral environment. Six trainees then completed the task three more times in an environment overlain with distractions commonly found in the operating theatre. Six others completed three more tasks in a neutral environment. Stress was measured by recording heart rate and by assessing responses to the NASA Task Load Index. Performance was measured using instrument tracking metrics and time to complete the task. Results: The distracted participants reported significantly higher effort, frustration, and physical demand than the neutral group, as measured by the NASA Task Load Index, (P = .001, .031, and .044, respectively). The neutral group completed their final task significantly faster compared with baseline (P = .049), while the distracted group failed to show this improvement. The distracted group showed higher hand discordance, suggesting reduced ambidexterity. Conclusion: Distraction negatively impacted some aspects of performance and resulted in subjective increased stress. In future, simulation may have a role in "stress inoculation," enabling surgeons to maintain performance, despite distractions.
背景:外科医生在手术过程中难免会分心。分心会导致压力,而压力会损害认知和运动技能,从而影响外科医生的工作表现。本研究评估了在模拟腹腔镜任务中,分心对外科医生压力水平和外科医生表现的影响。研究方法12 名外科受训人员在中立环境中使用腹腔镜模拟器完成了三次钉线转移任务。然后,六名学员在手术室中常见的干扰环境中再完成三次任务。另外六名学员在中立环境中完成另外三次任务。通过记录心率和评估对 NASA 任务负荷指数的反应来测量压力。通过仪器跟踪指标和完成任务的时间来测量表现。结果显示根据美国航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA Task Load Index),分心参与者的努力程度、挫败感和体力需求明显高于中立组(P = .001、.031 和 .044)。与基线相比,中立组完成最终任务的速度明显加快(P = .049),而注意力分散组则没有出现这种改善。注意力分散组的手部不协调程度更高,这表明他们的灵活性有所降低。结论注意力分散对成绩的某些方面产生了负面影响,并导致主观压力增加。未来,模拟可能会在 "压力接种 "中发挥作用,使外科医生能够在分心的情况下保持工作表现。
{"title":"The Effect of External Distractions on Simulated Laparoscopic Performance.","authors":"Isabel Ingram,Mark A Hughes","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0280","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Surgeons are exposed to unavoidable distractions while operating. Distractions can cause stress, and stress can impair cognition and motor skills to the detriment of surgeon performance. This study assessed the impact of distractions on surgeon stress levels and surgeon performance during simulated laparoscopic tasks. Methods: Twelve surgical trainees completed a peg-thread transfer task three times on a laparoscopic simulator in a neutral environment. Six trainees then completed the task three more times in an environment overlain with distractions commonly found in the operating theatre. Six others completed three more tasks in a neutral environment. Stress was measured by recording heart rate and by assessing responses to the NASA Task Load Index. Performance was measured using instrument tracking metrics and time to complete the task. Results: The distracted participants reported significantly higher effort, frustration, and physical demand than the neutral group, as measured by the NASA Task Load Index, (P = .001, .031, and .044, respectively). The neutral group completed their final task significantly faster compared with baseline (P = .049), while the distracted group failed to show this improvement. The distracted group showed higher hand discordance, suggesting reduced ambidexterity. Conclusion: Distraction negatively impacted some aspects of performance and resulted in subjective increased stress. In future, simulation may have a role in \"stress inoculation,\" enabling surgeons to maintain performance, despite distractions.","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142214613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, after Percutaneous Gall Bladder Drainage, for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis TG18 in Patients with Concomitant Cardiopulmonary Disease. 对于合并心肺疾病的 II 级急性胆囊炎 TG18 患者,经皮胆囊引流术后早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0233
Mohamed Wael, Mostafa Seif, Mohamed Mourad, Hashem Altabbaa, Ibrahim Mabrouk Ibrahim, Mostafa Refaie Elkeleny

Background: The advancement in medical care has led to an increase in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) and cardiopulmonary comorbidities referred for surgery. Grade II AC, according to Tokyo Guidelines in 2018 (TG18), is characterized by severe local inflammation with no systemic affection. The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk grade II AC has not yet been clearly established, which is still a dilemma. For these patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite being the only definitive treatment, is still a challenge. The introduction of percutaneous cholecystostomy as a temporary minimally invasive alternative technique allows an immediate gallbladder decompression with a rapid clinical improvement. However, the next step after percutaneous transhepatic gall bladder drainage (PTGBD) in these high-risk patients is still a debate, with no definitive consensus about the ideal treatment of choice as well as its optimal timing. In our study, we followed a treatment algorithm for high-risk patients that involved early gallbladder decompression by PTGBD, followed by LC at different intervals once the patient is considered fit for surgery. Method: A retrospective study of 58 patients with high-risk grade II AC with cardiopulmonary comorbidity from our medical records was included. They were managed initially with PTGBD, an LC was then performed either within 7 days after drain insertion (early group, 26 patients), while an LC was performed later for the remaining patients within 6-8 weeks after PTGBD (late group, 32 patients). The results of the two groups were analyzed. Result: Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were significantly higher in the late group. No significant difference was found between both groups with regard to operative time, PTGBD-related complications, and major perioperative complications. Timing after PTGBD did not affect the incidence of operative complications. Total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group. Conclusion: PTGBD is a safe initial intervention for high-risk patients with AC with a low morbidity and high success rate. Urgent LC after PTGBD can be performed safely for well-selected high-risk patients with the timing of surgery is personalized according to each patient's clinical situation. Early LC (after PTGBD) has the advantage of shorter hospital stay, low cost, as well as avoiding the risk of biliary complications and mortality if waiting a delayed surgery with no significant difference in morbidity compared with late LC.

背景:随着医疗水平的提高,急性胆囊炎(AC)和心肺合并症患者转诊手术的人数不断增加。根据《2018 年东京指南》(TG18),II 级 AC 的特点是局部炎症严重,但无全身感染。对于高风险的 II 级 AC 患者,最佳治疗方法尚未明确确立,这仍是一个难题。对这些患者而言,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)尽管是唯一明确的治疗方法,但仍是一项挑战。经皮胆囊造口术作为一种临时的微创替代技术,可以立即进行胆囊减压,并迅速改善临床症状。然而,这些高危患者在接受经皮经肝胆囊引流术(PTGBD)后的下一步治疗仍存在争议,对于理想的首选治疗方法及其最佳时机仍未达成明确共识。在我们的研究中,我们采用了一种针对高危患者的治疗算法,即通过经皮经肝胆囊引流术(PTGBD)进行早期胆囊减压,然后在患者被认为适合手术后的不同时间段进行LC治疗。方法:我们对病历中 58 例合并心肺疾病的高危 II 级 AC 患者进行了回顾性研究。这些患者最初均接受 PTGBD 治疗,然后在插入引流管后 7 天内进行 LC(早期组,26 例患者),而其余患者则在 PTGBD 术后 6-8 周内进行 LC(晚期组,32 例患者)。对两组患者的结果进行了分析。结果晚期组患者的降钙素原和 C 反应蛋白明显升高。两组在手术时间、PTGBD 相关并发症和主要围手术期并发症方面无明显差异。PTGBD术后的时间并不影响手术并发症的发生率。早期组的总住院时间明显较短。结论:PTGBD是针对高危AC患者的一种安全的初始干预措施,发病率低,成功率高。对于经过严格筛选的高危患者,PTGBD 后的紧急 LC 可以安全实施,手术时机可根据每位患者的临床情况进行个性化选择。早期胆道造影(PTGBD 术后)具有住院时间短、费用低的优点,而且与晚期胆道造影相比,在发病率方面无明显差异,避免了延迟手术带来的胆道并发症和死亡风险。
{"title":"Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, after Percutaneous Gall Bladder Drainage, for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis TG18 in Patients with Concomitant Cardiopulmonary Disease.","authors":"Mohamed Wael, Mostafa Seif, Mohamed Mourad, Hashem Altabbaa, Ibrahim Mabrouk Ibrahim, Mostafa Refaie Elkeleny","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The advancement in medical care has led to an increase in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) and cardiopulmonary comorbidities referred for surgery. Grade II AC, according to Tokyo Guidelines in 2018 (TG18), is characterized by severe local inflammation with no systemic affection. The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk grade II AC has not yet been clearly established, which is still a dilemma. For these patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite being the only definitive treatment, is still a challenge. The introduction of percutaneous cholecystostomy as a temporary minimally invasive alternative technique allows an immediate gallbladder decompression with a rapid clinical improvement. However, the next step after percutaneous transhepatic gall bladder drainage (PTGBD) in these high-risk patients is still a debate, with no definitive consensus about the ideal treatment of choice as well as its optimal timing. In our study, we followed a treatment algorithm for high-risk patients that involved early gallbladder decompression by PTGBD, followed by LC at different intervals once the patient is considered fit for surgery. <b><i>Method:</i></b> A retrospective study of 58 patients with high-risk grade II AC with cardiopulmonary comorbidity from our medical records was included. They were managed initially with PTGBD, an LC was then performed either within 7 days after drain insertion (early group, 26 patients), while an LC was performed later for the remaining patients within 6-8 weeks after PTGBD (late group, 32 patients). The results of the two groups were analyzed. <b><i>Result:</i></b> Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were significantly higher in the late group. No significant difference was found between both groups with regard to operative time, PTGBD-related complications, and major perioperative complications. Timing after PTGBD did not affect the incidence of operative complications. Total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> PTGBD is a safe initial intervention for high-risk patients with AC with a low morbidity and high success rate. Urgent LC after PTGBD can be performed safely for well-selected high-risk patients with the timing of surgery is personalized according to each patient's clinical situation. Early LC (after PTGBD) has the advantage of shorter hospital stay, low cost, as well as avoiding the risk of biliary complications and mortality if waiting a delayed surgery with no significant difference in morbidity compared with late LC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Telescopic Dissection as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Balloon Trocar for Preperitoneal Dissection in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair. 在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中,用伸缩式剥离器替代球囊套管进行腹膜前剥离具有成本效益。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0223
Burak Dinçer, Sinan Ömeroğlu, İsmail Ethem Akgün

Background: Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is one of the commonly used minimally invasive method in inguinal hernia repair. There are limited data that compares the results of the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar for preperitoneal dissection. In our study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the TEP cases performed at our center and compare the results of these two techniques. Methods: TEP cases performed between 2020 and 2024 were evaluated. Strangulated and recurrent hernia cases were excluded. Telescopic dissection and balloon trocar techniques were compared in terms of conversion, postoperative pain, complications, and recurrence. Results: A total of 177 patients were included. Telescopic method was used in 122 cases, while a balloon trocar was used in 55 cases. The median age was 50 years (range: 20-86), and 163 patients (92%) were male. Bilateral inguinal hernia was present in 61 patients (35%). The median operative time was 100 minutes (IQR: 80-120 minutes). Conversion was required in a total of 3 cases (1.5%); specifically, the transabdominal preperitoneal method was employed in 2 cases, and Lichtenstein-style anterior approach hernia repair was performed in one case. Between the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar groups, no significant differences were observed in operation time (P = .407), conversion rates (P = .228), postoperative pain scores (P = .505, P = .264, P = .681, P = .743), complication rates (P = .205), or recurrence rates (P = .311). Conclusions: The results of using a balloon trocar and telescopic dissection in inguinal hernia repair with TEP are similar, and telescopic dissection could be a cost-effective alternative to the balloon trocar.

背景:全腹膜外(TEP)方法是腹股沟疝修补术中常用的微创方法之一。目前比较腹膜前剥离的伸缩式剥离和球囊套管的结果的数据有限。在我们的研究中,我们旨在回顾性评估在本中心实施的 TEP 病例,并比较这两种技术的效果。方法:对 2020 年至 2024 年期间实施的 TEP 病例进行评估。排除了绞窄性疝和复发性疝病例。从转归、术后疼痛、并发症和复发等方面比较了伸缩式剥离和球囊套管技术。结果:共纳入 177 名患者。122例使用了伸缩式方法,55例使用了球囊套管。中位年龄为 50 岁(范围:20-86 岁),163 名患者(92%)为男性。61例患者(35%)存在双侧腹股沟疝。手术时间中位数为 100 分钟(IQR:80-120 分钟)。共有 3 例患者(1.5%)需要进行转换手术,其中 2 例采用了经腹腹膜前法,1 例采用了 Lichtenstein 式前路疝修补术。在伸缩剥离组和球囊套管组之间,手术时间(P = .407)、转换率(P = .228)、术后疼痛评分(P = .505、P = .264、P = .681、P = .743)、并发症发生率(P = .205)和复发率(P = .311)均无明显差异。结论:在使用 TEP 进行腹股沟疝修补术时,使用球囊套管和伸缩式剥离器的效果相似,伸缩式剥离器可能是替代球囊套管的一种经济有效的方法。
{"title":"Telescopic Dissection as a Cost-Effective Alternative to Balloon Trocar for Preperitoneal Dissection in Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.","authors":"Burak Dinçer, Sinan Ömeroğlu, İsmail Ethem Akgün","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is one of the commonly used minimally invasive method in inguinal hernia repair. There are limited data that compares the results of the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar for preperitoneal dissection. In our study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the TEP cases performed at our center and compare the results of these two techniques. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> TEP cases performed between 2020 and 2024 were evaluated. Strangulated and recurrent hernia cases were excluded. Telescopic dissection and balloon trocar techniques were compared in terms of conversion, postoperative pain, complications, and recurrence. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 177 patients were included. Telescopic method was used in 122 cases, while a balloon trocar was used in 55 cases. The median age was 50 years (range: 20-86), and 163 patients (92%) were male. Bilateral inguinal hernia was present in 61 patients (35%). The median operative time was 100 minutes (IQR: 80-120 minutes). Conversion was required in a total of 3 cases (1.5%); specifically, the transabdominal preperitoneal method was employed in 2 cases, and Lichtenstein-style anterior approach hernia repair was performed in one case. Between the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar groups, no significant differences were observed in operation time (<i>P</i> = .407), conversion rates (<i>P</i> = .228), postoperative pain scores (<i>P</i> = .505, <i>P</i> = .264, <i>P</i> = .681, <i>P</i> = .743), complication rates (<i>P</i> = .205), or recurrence rates (<i>P</i> = .311). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The results of using a balloon trocar and telescopic dissection in inguinal hernia repair with TEP are similar, and telescopic dissection could be a cost-effective alternative to the balloon trocar.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142134308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Sublay Repair of Lumbar Hernia: A Novel Technique. 单切口腹腔镜完全腹膜外下腰椎疝修补术:一项新技术
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0174
Yizhong Zhang, Weidong Wu, Tingfeng Wang, Xianke Si, Liangliang Huang, Rui Tang, Nan Liu

Background: Lumbar hernia is a rare disease with low incidence, and no golden standard surgical procedure has been established for lumbar hernias. The single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal sublay (SIL-TES) technique became a novel surgical technique for lumbar hernias. Methods: This retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent SIL-TES repair for lumbar hernia between April 2020 and March 2024. The baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative data, postoperative data, satisfaction score, and Carolina Comfort Scale scores were collected. Results: The results revealed that the SIL-TES technique for lumbar hernia repair is associated with a low complication rate, nonrecurrence, high satisfaction score, and high quality of life after surgery. Conclusions: The SIL-TES technique could be a feasible and effective surgical technique for lumbar hernias. A controlled study is needed for further confirmation.

背景:腰椎疝气是一种罕见疾病,发病率很低,目前还没有针对腰椎疝气的黄金标准手术方法。单切口腹腔镜腹膜外全层置入(SIL-TES)技术成为治疗腰疝的新手术技术。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了 20 名在 2020 年 4 月至 2024 年 3 月期间接受 SIL-TES 修补术治疗腰椎疝的患者。研究收集了患者的基线特征、术中数据、术后数据、满意度评分和卡罗莱纳舒适度量表评分。结果显示结果显示,SIL-TES 腰疝修补术的并发症发生率低、无复发、满意度高、术后生活质量高。结论SIL-TES 技术是治疗腰椎疝气的一种可行且有效的手术技术。需要进行对照研究以进一步证实。
{"title":"Single-Incision Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Sublay Repair of Lumbar Hernia: A Novel Technique.","authors":"Yizhong Zhang, Weidong Wu, Tingfeng Wang, Xianke Si, Liangliang Huang, Rui Tang, Nan Liu","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0174","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0174","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Lumbar hernia is a rare disease with low incidence, and no golden standard surgical procedure has been established for lumbar hernias. The single-incision laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal sublay (SIL-TES) technique became a novel surgical technique for lumbar hernias. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent SIL-TES repair for lumbar hernia between April 2020 and March 2024. The baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative data, postoperative data, satisfaction score, and Carolina Comfort Scale scores were collected. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The results revealed that the SIL-TES technique for lumbar hernia repair is associated with a low complication rate, nonrecurrence, high satisfaction score, and high quality of life after surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The SIL-TES technique could be a feasible and effective surgical technique for lumbar hernias. A controlled study is needed for further confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"845-850"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rosalind Franklin Society Proudly Announces the 2023 Award Recipient for Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 罗莎琳德-富兰克林学会自豪地宣布《腹腔镜和高级外科技术杂志》2023 年获奖者。
IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.92316.rfs2023
Kelly T Bishop
{"title":"Rosalind Franklin Society Proudly Announces the 2023 Award Recipient for Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.","authors":"Kelly T Bishop","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.92316.rfs2023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.92316.rfs2023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"19 1","pages":"771"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Virtual Reality for Preoperative Surgical Planning in Complex Pediatric Oncology. 虚拟现实技术用于复杂儿科肿瘤的术前手术规划。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0039
Matthew Bramlet, Charles J Aprahamian, Paul M Jeziorczak, Anthony J Munaco, Olivia A Perham, Vadim Lyuksemberg, Daniel J Robertson

Background: Virtual reality modeling (VRM) is a 3-dimensional simulation created from patient-specific 2-dimensional (2D) imaging. VRM creates a more accurate representation of the patient anatomy and can improve anatomical perception. We surveyed surgeons on their operative plan in complex pediatric oncology cases based on review of 2D imaging and subsequently after review of VRM. We hypothesized that the confidence level would increase with the use of virtual reality and that VRM may change the operative plan. Methods: Patients were selected and enrolled based on age (<18) and oncological diagnosis. VRM was created based on the 2D imaging. Surgeons identified surgical plans based on 2D imaging and again after VRM. A blinded surgeon not involved with the case also gave opinions on surgical plans after viewing both the 2D and the VRM imaging. These assessments were compared with the actual operation. Results: A total of 12 patients were enrolled. Diagnoses included six neuroblastomas, two Wilms tumors, one Ewing's sarcoma, one pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas, one rhabdomyosarcoma, and one mediastinal germ cell tumor. VRM increased the operating surgeon's confidence 63% of the time. The operative plan changed 8.3% of the time after VRM. Conclusion: VRM is useful to help clarify operative plans for more complex pediatric cases.

背景:虚拟现实建模(VRM)是根据患者特定的二维(2D)成像创建的三维模拟。虚拟现实建模能更准确地再现患者的解剖结构,并能改善解剖感知。我们对外科医生进行了调查,以了解他们在复杂的儿科肿瘤病例中根据 2D 成像检查和随后的 VRM 检查制定的手术计划。我们假设,使用虚拟现实技术后,外科医生的信心水平会提高,而且 VRM 可能会改变手术计划。方法:根据患者的年龄进行筛选和登记(结果:共有 12 名患者登记:共有 12 名患者入选。诊断结果包括 6 例神经母细胞瘤、2 例 Wilms 肿瘤、1 例尤文氏肉瘤、1 例胰腺假乳头状瘤、1 例横纹肌肉瘤和 1 例纵隔生殖细胞瘤。63% 的情况下,VRM 增加了手术医生的信心。在进行 VRM 后,有 8.3% 的手术计划发生了改变。结论:VRM 有助于帮助明确较为复杂的儿科病例的手术计划。
{"title":"Virtual Reality for Preoperative Surgical Planning in Complex Pediatric Oncology.","authors":"Matthew Bramlet, Charles J Aprahamian, Paul M Jeziorczak, Anthony J Munaco, Olivia A Perham, Vadim Lyuksemberg, Daniel J Robertson","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0039","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2023.0039","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Virtual reality modeling (VRM) is a 3-dimensional simulation created from patient-specific 2-dimensional (2D) imaging. VRM creates a more accurate representation of the patient anatomy and can improve anatomical perception. We surveyed surgeons on their operative plan in complex pediatric oncology cases based on review of 2D imaging and subsequently after review of VRM. We hypothesized that the confidence level would increase with the use of virtual reality and that VRM may change the operative plan. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients were selected and enrolled based on age (<18) and oncological diagnosis. VRM was created based on the 2D imaging. Surgeons identified surgical plans based on 2D imaging and again after VRM. A blinded surgeon not involved with the case also gave opinions on surgical plans after viewing both the 2D and the VRM imaging. These assessments were compared with the actual operation. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 12 patients were enrolled. Diagnoses included six neuroblastomas, two Wilms tumors, one Ewing's sarcoma, one pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas, one rhabdomyosarcoma, and one mediastinal germ cell tumor. VRM increased the operating surgeon's confidence 63% of the time. The operative plan changed 8.3% of the time after VRM. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> VRM is useful to help clarify operative plans for more complex pediatric cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"861-865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141617569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1