首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Gastric Bypass with and Without Gastric Ring for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: Results from Retrospective Analysis of a Prospective Database. 使用或不使用胃环的胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖症:前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析结果。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0299
Ana Carolina Andrade Canut, Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Willy Petrini Souza, Danilo de Marchi, Bruno Zilberstein

Introduction: To assess the medium-term weight loss and maintenance of lean body mass (ideal weight/weight loss maintenance) following the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgical procedure with or without the use of a rigid gastric ring. Method: An observational cohort study with a retrospective approach was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of RYGB with and without a band in patients with morbid obesity. The outcomes were assessed by analyzing data obtained from medical records, including pre- and postoperative data. Results: A total of 239 patients who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2018 were included, with 150 undergoing RYGB without a ring and 89 using a ring. The group subjected to the intervention with a rigid ring showed a significantly higher average body mass index loss than the ringless group (coefficient -2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-3.92 to -0.97], P < .001) at 1 year. After a follow-up period of 5 years, the use of a gastric ring was still associated with significant improvement in weight loss, even after multivariate adjustment (coefficient 6.62, 95% CI: [+ 4.30 ± 8.95], P < .001). Less than 5% of patients needed gastric band removal during the follow-up period. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort of 239 patients, using a ring in RYGB was associated with a significant increase in weight loss and maintenance of lean body mass.

简介:目的评估使用或不使用硬胃环进行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路(RYGB)手术后的中期体重减轻和瘦体重维持情况(理想体重/减重维持)。研究方法采用回顾性方法进行了一项观察性队列研究,以评估在病态肥胖患者中使用或不使用硬胃环(RYGB)的效果。通过分析从病历中获得的数据(包括术前和术后数据)来评估疗效。结果共纳入了 239 名在 2001 年至 2018 年期间接受手术的患者,其中 150 人接受了无腹带 RYGB 术,89 人接受了有腹带 RYGB 术。1年后,接受硬环干预组的平均体重指数下降明显高于无环组(系数-2.45;95%置信区间[CI]:[-3.92至-0.97],P < .001)。随访 5 年后,即使经过多变量调整(系数 6.62,95% 置信区间 [CI]:[+ 4.30 ± 8.95],P < .001),使用胃环仍能显著减轻体重。在随访期间,需要拆除胃束带的患者不到 5%。结论在这个由 239 名患者组成的回顾性队列中,在 RYGB 中使用胃环可显著增加体重并保持瘦体重。
{"title":"Gastric Bypass with and Without Gastric Ring for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: Results from Retrospective Analysis of a Prospective Database.","authors":"Ana Carolina Andrade Canut, Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Willy Petrini Souza, Danilo de Marchi, Bruno Zilberstein","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0299","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> To assess the medium-term weight loss and maintenance of lean body mass (ideal weight/weight loss maintenance) following the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgical procedure with or without the use of a rigid gastric ring. <b><i>Method:</i></b> An observational cohort study with a retrospective approach was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of RYGB with and without a band in patients with morbid obesity. The outcomes were assessed by analyzing data obtained from medical records, including pre- and postoperative data. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 239 patients who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2018 were included, with 150 undergoing RYGB without a ring and 89 using a ring. The group subjected to the intervention with a rigid ring showed a significantly higher average body mass index loss than the ringless group (coefficient -2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-3.92 to -0.97], <i>P</i> < .001) at 1 year. After a follow-up period of 5 years, the use of a gastric ring was still associated with significant improvement in weight loss, even after multivariate adjustment (coefficient 6.62, 95% CI: [+ 4.30 ± 8.95], <i>P</i> < .001). Less than 5% of patients needed gastric band removal during the follow-up period. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In this retrospective cohort of 239 patients, using a ring in RYGB was associated with a significant increase in weight loss and maintenance of lean body mass.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of HIV Infection on Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Long-Term Prognostic Analysis. 艾滋病病毒感染对肝细胞癌的影响:长期预后分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0191
Yu-Hang Diao, Fa-Ping Gong, Yong Cheng

Purpose: This study aims to explore the influence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: According to the search strategy, we searched all relevant articles in the three databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) up to February 18, 2024. All data available for analysis were extracted. Continuous variables were expressed as mean difference (MD) with standard deviation (SD). The categorical variables were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Forest plots were used to illustrate the analysis results, and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Results: The study included a total of 4544 subjects. HIV patients were significantly younger compared to those without HIV (MD = -16.13, 95% CI = -17.24 to -15.01, I2 = 91, P < .01), but there were no significant differences in other relevant clinical characteristics between the groups. Survival analysis indicated that HIV patients exhibited a poorer long-term prognosis compared with HIV-negative patients (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.79, I2 = 29%, P < .01). Conclusion: HIV infection, which compromises immune function and liver health, predisposes individuals to earlier onset of HCC and is associated with a poorer prognosis.

{"title":"Impact of HIV Infection on Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Long-Term Prognostic Analysis.","authors":"Yu-Hang Diao, Fa-Ping Gong, Yong Cheng","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0191","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0191","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aims to explore the influence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> According to the search strategy, we searched all relevant articles in the three databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) up to February 18, 2024. All data available for analysis were extracted. Continuous variables were expressed as mean difference (MD) with standard deviation (SD). The categorical variables were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Forest plots were used to illustrate the analysis results, and funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study included a total of 4544 subjects. HIV patients were significantly younger compared to those without HIV (MD = -16.13, 95% CI = -17.24 to -15.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 91, <i>P</i> < .01), but there were no significant differences in other relevant clinical characteristics between the groups. Survival analysis indicated that HIV patients exhibited a poorer long-term prognosis compared with HIV-negative patients (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.79, I<i><sup>2</sup></i> = 29%, <i>P</i> < .01). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> HIV infection, which compromises immune function and liver health, predisposes individuals to earlier onset of HCC and is associated with a poorer prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"35 2","pages":"109-117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143460415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Out-of-Hours Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Acute Appendicitis? 非工作时间腹腔镜阑尾切除术:急性阑尾炎术后并发症的危险因素?
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0268
Hanbaro Kim, Byung Mo Kang

Background: The surgical environment can influence the clinical outcomes of procedures and patient conditions. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate how surgical timing affects short-term outcomes in emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Methods: A total of 647 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy at Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital between January 2018 and June 2021 were included in this study. The study cohort was divided into the following two groups based on the timing of surgery: work hours and out-of-hours (weekends, holidays, or weekday nights). Clinical outcomes were then compared between the groups. Results: Work-hour and out-of-hours appendectomies were performed in 282 and 365 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics and types of appendicitis were similar between the groups (complicated appendicitis: 26.6% in the work-hours group versus 30.4% in the out-of-hours group, P = .288). Operation times were comparable (35.10 minutes versus 34.33 minutes, P = .620), with no cases requiring conversion to open appendectomy in either group. The overall rate of 30-day postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups (7.8% versus 10.4%, P = .849). The severity of postoperative complications, categorized by the modified Clavien-Dindo classification, did not show significant differences between the groups (P = .849). In addition, the time to functional recovery was similar in both groups. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of out-of-hours laparoscopic appendectomy were similar to those of procedures performed during working hours. Therefore, scheduling emergency surgery can be determined based on the patient's condition and the hospital's capacity to manage acute appendicitis.

背景:手术环境可以影响手术的临床结果和患者的情况。本回顾性研究旨在评估手术时机如何影响急性阑尾炎急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术的短期预后。方法:本研究纳入2018年1月至2021年6月在春川圣心医院行急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎患者647例。研究队列根据手术时间分为以下两组:工作时间和非工作时间(周末、节假日或工作日晚上)。然后比较两组之间的临床结果。结果:工作时间阑尾切除术282例,非工作时间阑尾切除术365例。两组之间阑尾炎的基线特征和类型相似(复杂阑尾炎:工作时间组26.6%,非工作时间组30.4%,P = 0.288)。手术时间具有可比性(35.10分钟vs 34.33分钟,P = 0.620),两组均无病例需要转行开腹阑尾切除术。两组术后30天并发症的总发生率无显著差异(7.8% vs 10.4%, P = 0.849)。术后并发症严重程度采用改良Clavien-Dindo分类,两组间无显著差异(P = .849)。此外,两组的功能恢复时间相似。结论:非工作时间腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床效果与工作时间手术相似。因此,急诊手术的安排可以根据患者的病情和医院处理急性阑尾炎的能力来确定。
{"title":"Out-of-Hours Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Acute Appendicitis?","authors":"Hanbaro Kim, Byung Mo Kang","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0268","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The surgical environment can influence the clinical outcomes of procedures and patient conditions. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate how surgical timing affects short-term outcomes in emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 647 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent emergency laparoscopic appendectomy at Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital between January 2018 and June 2021 were included in this study. The study cohort was divided into the following two groups based on the timing of surgery: work hours and out-of-hours (weekends, holidays, or weekday nights). Clinical outcomes were then compared between the groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Work-hour and out-of-hours appendectomies were performed in 282 and 365 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics and types of appendicitis were similar between the groups (complicated appendicitis: 26.6% in the work-hours group versus 30.4% in the out-of-hours group, <i>P</i> = .288). Operation times were comparable (35.10 minutes versus 34.33 minutes, <i>P</i> = .620), with no cases requiring conversion to open appendectomy in either group. The overall rate of 30-day postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups (7.8% versus 10.4%, <i>P</i> = .849). The severity of postoperative complications, categorized by the modified Clavien-Dindo classification, did not show significant differences between the groups (<i>P</i> = .849). In addition, the time to functional recovery was similar in both groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The clinical outcomes of out-of-hours laparoscopic appendectomy were similar to those of procedures performed during working hours. Therefore, scheduling emergency surgery can be determined based on the patient's condition and the hospital's capacity to manage acute appendicitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium.
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0305
Michael Raver, Mutahar Ahmed, Kennedy E Okhawere, Indu Saini, Ruchir Chaturvedi, Milan Patel, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Nicolas A Soputro, Roxana Ramos, Mubashir Billah, Simone Crivellaro, Ahmed M Mansour, Jihad Kaouk, Nirmish Singla, James Porter, Ronney Abaza, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K Hemal, Phillip M Pierorazio, Benjamin I Chung, Craig G Rogers, Reza Mehrazin, Ketan Badani, Michael Stifelman

Introduction: Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. Results: Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. Conclusion: The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.

{"title":"Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium.","authors":"Michael Raver, Mutahar Ahmed, Kennedy E Okhawere, Indu Saini, Ruchir Chaturvedi, Milan Patel, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Nicolas A Soputro, Roxana Ramos, Mubashir Billah, Simone Crivellaro, Ahmed M Mansour, Jihad Kaouk, Nirmish Singla, James Porter, Ronney Abaza, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K Hemal, Phillip M Pierorazio, Benjamin I Chung, Craig G Rogers, Reza Mehrazin, Ketan Badani, Michael Stifelman","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0305","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"131-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143257104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Surgical Results and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approaches in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Analysis. 双侧腹股沟疝修补术中腹腔镜经腹膜前入路和腹腔镜完全腹膜外入路的手术效果和有效性评估:随机分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0360
Zafer Şenol

Background: Laparoscopic surgery is recommended as the standard approach for bilateral inguinal hernia repair. There are few studies in the literature comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches for bilateral inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes and effectiveness of laparoscopic TAPP and laparoscopic TEP methods applied in bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Methods: A total of 100 patients operated on for bilateral inguinal hernia by applying laparoscopic TAPP and laparoscopic TEP methods from January 2016 to March 2023 were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally in two groups. Postoperative follow-up results were statistically analyzed in terms of recurrence rate, swelling in the incisions, scrotal edema and swelling, suture dehiscence, and the average time to return to work. Results: In bilateral inguinal hernia patients operated with laparoscopic TAPP method compared with bilateral inguinal hernia patients operated with laparoscopic TEP method, postoperative recurrence rate was significantly lower (2% versus 16%), swelling in the incision sites was significantly less (4% versus 24%), and the average time to return to work was significantly shorter (3.6 ± 2.3 versus 6.3 ± 5.8) (P < .05). Scrotal edema and swelling and suture dehiscence results did not show significant differences between the two approaches (P > .05). Conclusions: Both methods are widely used in bilateral inguinal hernia repairs. Postoperative results revealed that the laparoscopic TAPP method with less postoperative recurrence rate and less swelling in the incision sites, and shorter average time of the patients to return to work appears to be superior to the laparoscopic TEP method.

背景:腹腔镜手术被推荐为双侧腹股沟疝修补术的标准方法。文献中很少有比较腹腔镜经腹膜前(TAPP)和腹腔镜全腹膜外(TEP)方法用于双侧腹股沟疝修补术的研究。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜 TAPP 和腹腔镜 TEP 方法用于双侧腹股沟疝修补术的手术效果和有效性。方法:研究共纳入了100例2016年1月至2023年3月期间应用腹腔镜TAPP和腹腔镜TEP方法进行双侧腹股沟疝手术的患者。患者被随机平均分为两组。从复发率、切口肿胀、阴囊水肿和肿胀、缝线开裂以及恢复工作的平均时间等方面对术后随访结果进行统计分析。结果采用腹腔镜 TAPP 方法手术的双侧腹股沟疝患者与采用腹腔镜 TEP 方法手术的双侧腹股沟疝患者相比,术后复发率明显降低(2% 对 16%),切口部位肿胀明显减轻(4% 对 24%),恢复工作的平均时间明显缩短(3.6 ± 2.3 对 6.3 ± 5.8)(P < .05)。阴囊水肿和肿胀以及缝线开裂的结果在两种方法之间没有显著差异(P > .05)。结论:两种方法都广泛用于双侧腹股沟疝修补术。术后结果显示,腹腔镜TAPP方法术后复发率较低,切口部位肿胀较少,患者恢复工作的平均时间较短,似乎优于腹腔镜TEP方法。
{"title":"Evaluation of Surgical Results and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approaches in Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Analysis.","authors":"Zafer Şenol","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0360","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic surgery is recommended as the standard approach for bilateral inguinal hernia repair. There are few studies in the literature comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) approaches for bilateral inguinal hernia repair. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes and effectiveness of laparoscopic TAPP and laparoscopic TEP methods applied in bilateral inguinal hernia repair. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 100 patients operated on for bilateral inguinal hernia by applying laparoscopic TAPP and laparoscopic TEP methods from January 2016 to March 2023 were included in the study. The patients were randomized equally in two groups. Postoperative follow-up results were statistically analyzed in terms of recurrence rate, swelling in the incisions, scrotal edema and swelling, suture dehiscence, and the average time to return to work. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In bilateral inguinal hernia patients operated with laparoscopic TAPP method compared with bilateral inguinal hernia patients operated with laparoscopic TEP method, postoperative recurrence rate was significantly lower (2% versus 16%), swelling in the incision sites was significantly less (4% versus 24%), and the average time to return to work was significantly shorter (3.6 ± 2.3 versus 6.3 ± 5.8) (<i>P</i> < .05). Scrotal edema and swelling and suture dehiscence results did not show significant differences between the two approaches (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Both methods are widely used in bilateral inguinal hernia repairs. Postoperative results revealed that the laparoscopic TAPP method with less postoperative recurrence rate and less swelling in the incision sites, and shorter average time of the patients to return to work appears to be superior to the laparoscopic TEP method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"152-155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does Prior Lower Abdominal Surgery Prevent Laparoscopic Hernia Repair (Totally Extraperitoneal or Transabdominal Preperitoneal)? A Prospective Observational Study. 以前的下腹部手术是否会阻止腹腔镜疝修补术(完全腹膜外或经腹膜前)?前瞻性观察研究。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0349
Nevin Sakoglu, Turgut Donmez

Objective: Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) surgeries were considered contraindicated in patients who underwent lower abdominal surgery until recently. However, in recent surgeries, it has been reported that they can be performed safely in those cases. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair methods in patients who have and have not had lower abdominal surgery before. Patients and Method: This study was a prospective observational study between May 2018 and May 2023. Two hundred eighty-eight patients were included in the study. The operation was started with the TEP technique in all patients. Patients, classified in two groups who had not previously undergone abdominal surgery (n = 216) (Group I) and who had surgery (n = 72) (Group II). Demographic characteristics of patients, intraoperative and postoperative complications were determined. In addition to descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation), Shapiro-Wilk normality test, independent t test, and chi-square test were used to evaluate the data. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors affecting the presence of Previous Surgery and Peritoneal Tear. Results were evaluated at the significance level of P < .05. Results: Two hundred fifty-nine patients were operated with TEP method. TEP method was converted to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) in 9 patients from Group I and 20 patients from Group II. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Conclusion: With increasing experience in laparoscopic hernia surgery, it is now possible to perform hernia surgeries with preperitoneal (TEP) and abdominal approaches (TAPP) in patients who have previously undergone lower abdominal surgery.

目的:直到最近,完全腹膜外(TEP)手术一直被认为是下腹部手术患者的禁忌症。然而,在最近的手术中,有报道称在这些病例中可以安全地进行 TEP 手术。本研究的目的是探讨腹腔镜疝修补术在接受过和未接受过下腹部手术的患者中的有效性。患者和方法:本研究是一项前瞻性观察研究,时间为 2018 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月。研究共纳入 288 名患者。所有患者均采用 TEP 技术开始手术。患者分为两组,之前未接受过腹部手术的患者(n = 216)(第一组)和接受过手术的患者(n = 72)(第二组)。确定了患者的人口统计学特征、术中和术后并发症。除描述性统计方法(均值、标准差)外,还使用了 Shapiro-Wilk 正态性检验、独立 t 检验和卡方检验来评估数据。为确定影响既往手术和腹膜撕裂的因素,进行了逻辑回归分析。结果以 P < .05 为显著性水平。结果259 名患者采用 TEP 法进行了手术。第一组的 9 名患者和第二组的 20 名患者将 TEP 法改为经腹腹膜前 (TAPP)。记录了术中和术后并发症。结论:随着腹腔镜疝气手术经验的不断增加,现在已经可以为之前接受过下腹部手术的患者实施腹膜前(TEP)和腹腔入路(TAPP)疝气手术。
{"title":"Does Prior Lower Abdominal Surgery Prevent Laparoscopic Hernia Repair (Totally Extraperitoneal or Transabdominal Preperitoneal)? A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Nevin Sakoglu, Turgut Donmez","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0349","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) surgeries were considered contraindicated in patients who underwent lower abdominal surgery until recently. However, in recent surgeries, it has been reported that they can be performed safely in those cases. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair methods in patients who have and have not had lower abdominal surgery before. <b><i>Patients and Method:</i></b> This study was a prospective observational study between May 2018 and May 2023. Two hundred eighty-eight patients were included in the study. The operation was started with the TEP technique in all patients. Patients, classified in two groups who had not previously undergone abdominal surgery (<i>n</i> = 216) (Group I) and who had surgery (<i>n</i> = 72) (Group II). Demographic characteristics of patients, intraoperative and postoperative complications were determined. In addition to descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation), Shapiro-Wilk normality test, independent <i>t</i> test, and chi-square test were used to evaluate the data. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors affecting the presence of Previous Surgery and Peritoneal Tear. Results were evaluated at the significance level of <i>P</i> < .05. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two hundred fifty-nine patients were operated with TEP method. TEP method was converted to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) in 9 patients from Group I and 20 patients from Group II. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> With increasing experience in laparoscopic hernia surgery, it is now possible to perform hernia surgeries with preperitoneal (TEP) and abdominal approaches (TAPP) in patients who have previously undergone lower abdominal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"162-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142796259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Followed by Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Grade II Acute Cholecystitis According to Tokyo Guidelines TG18.
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0332
Mostafa R Elkeleny, Hany M K El-Haddad, Mohamed M Kandel, Mostafa I Seif El-Deen

Introduction: In the past, most patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) were treated conservatively. However, strong evidence from various studies has shown that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and should be the primary treatment for AC. However, this may not be the case for all AC grades. This study aimed to compare two recommended approaches for grade II AC as outlined in the Tokyo guidelines TG18, focusing on early operative outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for all patients diagnosed with grade II AC. The study compared patients who underwent early LC (group A, n = 130) with those who initially received percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) followed by LC (group B, n = 90). Results: Both groups had similar Tokyo classification parameters. However, there were significant differences in baseline data, operative challenges, and postoperative complications. Cholecystostomy-related complications were observed in seven patients. The conversion rate for was 25% for group A and 5% for group B. The incidence of intraoperative biliary injury was 10% for group A and 2.2% for group B. In group A, 92% of patients with biliary injury and 80% of those who required conversion to open surgery had evidence of localized inflammation around the gallbladder. Conclusion: For selected patients with grade II AC and higher risks, PC placement can be beneficial in preventing life-threatening consequences. The study suggests a 2-month interval between PC and subsequent LC. Overall, performing LC after PC was found to be easier than early LC. Local inflammatory changes, including empyema, were associated with higher complication rates in the early LC group.

{"title":"Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Followed by Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Grade II Acute Cholecystitis According to Tokyo Guidelines TG18.","authors":"Mostafa R Elkeleny, Hany M K El-Haddad, Mohamed M Kandel, Mostafa I Seif El-Deen","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> In the past, most patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) were treated conservatively. However, strong evidence from various studies has shown that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and should be the primary treatment for AC. However, this may not be the case for all AC grades. This study aimed to compare two recommended approaches for grade II AC as outlined in the Tokyo guidelines TG18, focusing on early operative outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for all patients diagnosed with grade II AC. The study compared patients who underwent early LC (group A, <i>n</i> = 130) with those who initially received percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) followed by LC (group B, <i>n</i> = 90). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Both groups had similar Tokyo classification parameters. However, there were significant differences in baseline data, operative challenges, and postoperative complications. Cholecystostomy-related complications were observed in seven patients. The conversion rate for was 25% for group A and 5% for group B. The incidence of intraoperative biliary injury was 10% for group A and 2.2% for group B. In group A, 92% of patients with biliary injury and 80% of those who required conversion to open surgery had evidence of localized inflammation around the gallbladder. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> For selected patients with grade II AC and higher risks, PC placement can be beneficial in preventing life-threatening consequences. The study suggests a 2-month interval between PC and subsequent LC. Overall, performing LC after PC was found to be easier than early LC. Local inflammatory changes, including empyema, were associated with higher complication rates in the early LC group.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143061281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Safe in Patients with Acute Cholangitis Caused by Common Bile Duct Stones? Results of a Systematic Review. 腹腔镜胆总管探查对胆总管结石引起的急性胆管炎安全吗?系统评价的结果。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0053
Ines Bejaoui, Mohamed Maatouk, Ghassen Hamdi Kbir, Yasser Karoui, Nada Essid, Mounir Ben Moussa

Introduction: The traditional method of performing open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE) was replaced by a less invasive procedure known as laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in elective surgery. But at present, the application of this technique is considered novel and controversial to treat acute cholangitis (AC). The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in patients with AC. Methods: Studies containing information on patients diagnosed with AC who underwent LCBDE were included. A search for relevant articles was carried out, in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. All studies included in the systematic review were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Results: A total of 10 studies were included. Seven were retrospective and three were prospective. Only one was a randomized controlled trial. There were three studies that compared elective LCBDE and emergency LCBDE. Two studies compared between primary closure and T-tube drainage. Two other studies focused on the comparison between LCBDE and OCBDE. One study examined the comparison of LCBDE and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Another study addressed the issue of conversion in LCBDE. One study compared early and delayed LCBDE. Conversion rates ranged from 0% to 16.92%. Morbidity ranged from 0% to 26.3%, and mortality ranged from 0% to 3.07%. There was no difference in terms of retained, residual, or recurrent stones, bile leak, hemorrhage, and postoperative pancreatitis, and this, comparing the different groups of patients. Bile duct and intestinal injuries as well as biliary stricture were not common. The average length of hospital stays was approximately 5.86 days, ranging from 2 to 11.12 days. Conclusion: The one-stage urgent LCBDE, while subject to debate, proves to be a secure, feasible, approach for managing nonsevere AC.

引言:传统的开放式胆总管探查(OCBDE)方法在择期手术中被一种侵入性较小的手术方法——腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)所取代。但目前,该技术在急性胆管炎(AC)治疗中的应用被认为是新颖和有争议的。本系统综述的目的是探讨腹腔镜手术治疗AC患者的安全性和有效性。方法:纳入包含诊断为AC的患者行LCBDE信息的研究。在Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和谷歌Scholar数据库中检索相关文章。所有纳入系统评价的研究均采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表进行评估。结果:共纳入10项研究。7项是回顾性研究,3项是前瞻性研究。只有一项是随机对照试验。有三项研究比较了选择性LCBDE和急诊LCBDE。两项研究比较了初次闭合和t管引流。另外两项研究侧重于LCBDE和OCBDE之间的比较。一项研究检查了LCBDE和内窥镜逆行胆管造影的比较。另一项研究解决了LCBDE的转化问题。一项研究比较了早期和延迟LCBDE。转化率从0%到16.92%不等。发病率为0% ~ 26.3%,死亡率为0% ~ 3.07%。在结石的保留、残留或复发、胆漏、出血和术后胰腺炎方面,比较不同组的患者没有差异。胆管、肠道损伤及胆道狭窄不常见。平均住院时间约为5.86天,从2天到11.12天不等。结论:一期紧急LCBDE虽然存在争议,但被证明是治疗非严重AC的一种安全、可行的方法。
{"title":"Is Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Safe in Patients with Acute Cholangitis Caused by Common Bile Duct Stones? Results of a Systematic Review.","authors":"Ines Bejaoui, Mohamed Maatouk, Ghassen Hamdi Kbir, Yasser Karoui, Nada Essid, Mounir Ben Moussa","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The traditional method of performing open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE) was replaced by a less invasive procedure known as laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in elective surgery. But at present, the application of this technique is considered novel and controversial to treat acute cholangitis (AC). The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in patients with AC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Studies containing information on patients diagnosed with AC who underwent LCBDE were included. A search for relevant articles was carried out, in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. All studies included in the systematic review were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 10 studies were included. Seven were retrospective and three were prospective. Only one was a randomized controlled trial. There were three studies that compared elective LCBDE and emergency LCBDE. Two studies compared between primary closure and T-tube drainage. Two other studies focused on the comparison between LCBDE and OCBDE. One study examined the comparison of LCBDE and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Another study addressed the issue of conversion in LCBDE. One study compared early and delayed LCBDE. Conversion rates ranged from 0% to 16.92%. Morbidity ranged from 0% to 26.3%, and mortality ranged from 0% to 3.07%. There was no difference in terms of retained, residual, or recurrent stones, bile leak, hemorrhage, and postoperative pancreatitis, and this, comparing the different groups of patients. Bile duct and intestinal injuries as well as biliary stricture were not common. The average length of hospital stays was approximately 5.86 days, ranging from 2 to 11.12 days. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The one-stage urgent LCBDE, while subject to debate, proves to be a secure, feasible, approach for managing nonsevere AC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"35 1","pages":"55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Postoperative Bleed Rates and Location of Bleed Between Vessel Sealing Devices after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后不同血管密封装置的术后出血率和出血位置比较
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0082
Dylan Cuva, Julia Park, Patricia Chui, Jeffrey Lipman, Peter Einersen, John K Saunders, Manish Parikh

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a commonly performed bariatric procedure. At our institution, two vessel sealing devices, Thunderbeat® (Olympus) and Maryland LigaSure™ (Covidien) are utilized for intraoperative dissection. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary SG from July 2013 through August 2022 was performed to evaluate postoperative bleeding (POB) rates between the two devices. The primary outcome measured was POB as defined by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), with secondary outcomes including reoperation, source of bleed, and overall safety. Results: A total of 8157 underwent SG. Average BMI and age were 43.2 kg/m2 and 37.1 years, respectively. A total of 6600 (80.9%) were female. Thunderbeat® was utilized in 5143 (63%) cases and Maryland LigaSure™ was used in 3014 (37%) cases. There was no significant difference in overall bleeding between the Thunderbeat® (18/5143, .35%) and the Maryland LigaSure™ (19/3014, .63%; P = .0689). However, there was a difference noted when comparing reoperation for bleeding between Thunderbeat® (9/5143, .17%) and Maryland LigaSure™ (13/3014, .43%; P = .0291). Furthermore, the location of bleeding in the reoperations was more common from the cut edge of the mesentery compared to the staple line with the Maryland LigaSure™ versus the Thunderbeat® (P = .038). Conclusions: The Thunderbeat® device is comparatively more hemostatic than the Maryland LigaSure™ for SG. The location of postoperative bleed may be related to vessel sealing devices used.

背景:腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(SG)是一种常用的减肥手术。在本院,Thunderbeat®(奥林巴斯)和Maryland LigaSure™(Covidien)两种血管密封装置被用于术中剥离。方法:对 2013 年 7 月至 2022 年 8 月期间接受初级 SG 的所有患者进行回顾性审查,以评估两种装置的术后出血率 (POB)。测量的主要结果是代谢与减肥手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)定义的POB,次要结果包括再次手术、出血来源和总体安全性。结果:共有 8157 人接受了 SG 手术。平均体重指数和年龄分别为 43.2 kg/m2 和 37.1 岁。共有 6600 人(80.9%)为女性。5143 例(63%)使用了 Thunderbeat®,3014 例(37%)使用了 Maryland LigaSure™。Thunderbeat®(18/5143,0.35%)和Maryland LigaSure™(19/3014,0.63%;P = 0.0689)的总体出血量没有明显差异。然而,在比较 Thunderbeat® (9/5143,0.17%)和 Maryland LigaSure™ (13/3014,0.43%;P = 0.0291)之间因出血而再次手术的情况时,发现两者之间存在差异。此外,与 Thunderbeat® 相比,马里兰 LigaSure™ 和 Thunderbeat® 再手术的出血位置更常见于系膜切缘,而不是缝合线(P = .038)。结论:就 SG 而言,Thunderbeat® 设备比 Maryland LigaSure™ 止血效果更好。术后出血的位置可能与使用的血管密封装置有关。
{"title":"Comparison of Postoperative Bleed Rates and Location of Bleed Between Vessel Sealing Devices after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.","authors":"Dylan Cuva, Julia Park, Patricia Chui, Jeffrey Lipman, Peter Einersen, John K Saunders, Manish Parikh","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0082","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a commonly performed bariatric procedure. At our institution, two vessel sealing devices, Thunderbeat<sup>®</sup> (Olympus) and Maryland LigaSure™ (Covidien) are utilized for intraoperative dissection. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary SG from July 2013 through August 2022 was performed to evaluate postoperative bleeding (POB) rates between the two devices. The primary outcome measured was POB as defined by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), with secondary outcomes including reoperation, source of bleed, and overall safety. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 8157 underwent SG. Average BMI and age were 43.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and 37.1 years, respectively. A total of 6600 (80.9%) were female. Thunderbeat<sup>®</sup> was utilized in 5143 (63%) cases and Maryland LigaSure™ was used in 3014 (37%) cases. There was no significant difference in overall bleeding between the Thunderbeat<sup>®</sup> (18/5143, .35%) and the Maryland LigaSure™ (19/3014, .63%; <i>P</i> = .0689). However, there was a difference noted when comparing reoperation for bleeding between Thunderbeat<sup>®</sup> (9/5143, .17%) and Maryland LigaSure™ (13/3014, .43%; <i>P</i> = .0291). Furthermore, the location of bleeding in the reoperations was more common from the cut edge of the mesentery compared to the staple line with the Maryland LigaSure™ versus the Thunderbeat<sup>®</sup> (<i>P</i> = .038). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The Thunderbeat<sup>®</sup> device is comparatively more hemostatic than the Maryland LigaSure™ for SG. The location of postoperative bleed may be related to vessel sealing devices used.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of 73 Cases of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Patient Selection is Key. 急性胆囊炎经皮胆囊造口术 73 例分析:患者选择是关键
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0363
Elisabeth Megan Rose Baggus, Connor Henry-Blake, Benjamin Chrisp, Ashley Coope, Andrew Gregory, Raimundas Lunevicius

Background: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) rates have substantially increased in England over the past two decades. However, its utilization and clinical outcomes at a local level are not well documented or understood. This study aimed to characterize the cohort of patients who underwent PC and resulting clinical outcomes at a tertiary center for hepatobiliary and emergency general surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients treated between 2012 and 2020 at a single center. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between Tokyo grade 2 and Tokyo grade 3 patients. Results: In the 73-patient cohort, a 57.1% increase in PC was observed between 2012 and 2020. Compared to the gold-standard Tokyo guidelines, 36 patients (49.3%) met the criteria for PC. Postprocedural complications occurred in 50 patients (68.5%), including PC tube dysfunction (27.4%), intra-abdominal abscess (20.5%), external bile leak (8.2%), and biloma (5.5%). Recurrent biliary infection developed in 30 patients (41.1%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) underwent emergency reinterventions due to acute cholecystitis recurrence. Twenty patients (27.4%) required radiological reintervention. Seven patients (9.6%) required emergency cholecystectomy, and ten patients (13.7%) underwent an elective cholecystectomy. Overall, 36 patients (49.3%) died during the follow-up period. Five patients (6.8%) died during index admission. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher rate of complications in the Tokyo grade 3 subgroup of 82.8% vs. 59.1% (P = .04). Patients from this subgroup were also more likely to require emergency additional abscess drainage (17.2% vs. 2.3%, P = .034). There was no significant difference in the number of emergency cholecystectomies performed between groups. Patients from the Tokyo grade 2 subgroup were more likely to have an elective cholecystectomy in the future (20.5% vs. 3.4%, P = .044). Conclusions: PC was overperformed in our patient cohort, and was associated with high postprocedure morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should be discerning in patient selection criteria for PC.

背景:过去二十年间,英国经皮胆囊造口术(PC)的使用率大幅提高。然而,当地对其使用情况和临床结果的记录和了解并不多。本研究旨在描述一家三级肝胆和急诊普外科中心接受经皮胆囊造口术的患者群体及其临床结果。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2012 年至 2020 年在一家中心接受治疗的患者。对东京2级和东京3级患者的预后进行了亚组分析比较。研究结果在 73 例患者队列中,2012 年至 2020 年间 PC 增加了 57.1%。与黄金标准东京指南相比,36 名患者(49.3%)符合 PC 标准。50名患者(68.5%)出现了术后并发症,包括PC管功能障碍(27.4%)、腹腔内脓肿(20.5%)、胆汁外漏(8.2%)和胆瘤(5.5%)。有 30 名患者(41.1%)出现复发性胆道感染。27名患者(37%)因急性胆囊炎复发而接受了紧急再介入治疗。20名患者(27.4%)需要进行放射科再介入治疗。七名患者(9.6%)需要进行急诊胆囊切除术,十名患者(13.7%)接受了择期胆囊切除术。在随访期间,共有 36 名患者(49.3%)死亡。5名患者(6.8%)在入院时死亡。亚组分析显示,东京 3 级亚组的并发症发生率较高,为 82.8% 对 59.1%(P = .04)。该亚组患者也更有可能需要紧急进行额外的脓肿引流(17.2% 对 2.3%,P = 0.034)。两组间急诊胆囊切除术的数量无明显差异。东京 2 级亚组患者将来更有可能接受择期胆囊切除术(20.5% 对 3.4%,P = .044)。结论:在我们的患者队列中,PC 术操作过度,术后发病率和死亡率较高。临床医生在选择 PC 患者标准时应擦亮眼睛。
{"title":"Analysis of 73 Cases of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Patient Selection is Key.","authors":"Elisabeth Megan Rose Baggus, Connor Henry-Blake, Benjamin Chrisp, Ashley Coope, Andrew Gregory, Raimundas Lunevicius","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0363","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0363","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) rates have substantially increased in England over the past two decades. However, its utilization and clinical outcomes at a local level are not well documented or understood. This study aimed to characterize the cohort of patients who underwent PC and resulting clinical outcomes at a tertiary center for hepatobiliary and emergency general surgery. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a retrospective cohort study of patients treated between 2012 and 2020 at a single center. A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between Tokyo grade 2 and Tokyo grade 3 patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the 73-patient cohort, a 57.1% increase in PC was observed between 2012 and 2020. Compared to the gold-standard Tokyo guidelines, 36 patients (49.3%) met the criteria for PC. Postprocedural complications occurred in 50 patients (68.5%), including PC tube dysfunction (27.4%), intra-abdominal abscess (20.5%), external bile leak (8.2%), and biloma (5.5%). Recurrent biliary infection developed in 30 patients (41.1%). Twenty-seven patients (37%) underwent emergency reinterventions due to acute cholecystitis recurrence. Twenty patients (27.4%) required radiological reintervention. Seven patients (9.6%) required emergency cholecystectomy, and ten patients (13.7%) underwent an elective cholecystectomy. Overall, 36 patients (49.3%) died during the follow-up period. Five patients (6.8%) died during index admission. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher rate of complications in the Tokyo grade 3 subgroup of 82.8% vs. 59.1% (<i>P</i> = .04). Patients from this subgroup were also more likely to require emergency additional abscess drainage (17.2% vs. 2.3%, <i>P</i> = .034). There was no significant difference in the number of emergency cholecystectomies performed between groups. Patients from the Tokyo grade 2 subgroup were more likely to have an elective cholecystectomy in the future (20.5% vs. 3.4%, <i>P</i> = .044). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PC was overperformed in our patient cohort, and was associated with high postprocedure morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should be discerning in patient selection criteria for PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142734359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1