Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques最新文献

Introduction: Ensuring patient safety in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) within the field of pediatric surgery requires systematic and extensive practice. Many groups have proposed mastery learning programs encompassing a range of training methods. However, short courses often have a narrow focus on specific objectives, limiting opportunities for sustained training. Our aim was to analyze our results with an online long-term competency-based and supervised training. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with prospective data collection of scores and performance of trainees during online courses from October 2020 to April 2023. Results: All participants (n = 76) were able to set up their personal training gym and complete the intensive stage of the course. The total score evolved from 2.60 ± 0.56 at the first meeting to 3.67 ± 0.61 at the fourth meeting, exhibiting a significant difference (P < .013). A considerable drop out was observed in the follow-up stage, with only 53.8% of the participants completing the course. When compared with the first meeting, they also showed a significant improvement with a mean general score of 3.85 ± 0.25 (P < .013) Conclusion: We have presented a novel online training program, based on continuous training that demonstrated that the unlimited access to a personal training gym allows surgeons to improve and maintain MIS skills.

Purpose: Weight thresholds have historically determined timing of enterostomy closure (EC) in premature neonates. Recent evidence suggests that neonates less than 2 kg (L2K) can safely undergo EC. We evaluate our single-center experience with performing EC in preterm neonates at L2K versus greater than 2 kg (G2K) at time of EC. Methods: A retrospective review of neonates who underwent EC from January 2018 to 2020 was performed. Neonates who were greater than 90 days at initial operation were excluded. Demographics, clinical characteristics including gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW), operative reports, and outcomes were reviewed. We compared 30-day complications between neonates who underwent EC at L2K and G2K. We also compared time to full feeds (FF) and postoperative length of stay (LOS). Results: Twenty-four neonates were included: 11 L2K and 13 G2K. The median GA and BW was 25.9 weeks (IQR 2.89) and 805 g (IQR 327), respectively. The most common intraoperative diagnosis during index operation was spontaneous perforation (70%), followed by necrotizing enterocolitis (8.69%). There were no significant differences in GA, BW, or diagnosis, between the L2K versus G2K cohort. We found no difference in complication rates, time to FF (12 days versus 10 days, P = .89), or postoperative LOS (31 days versus 36.5 days, P = .76) between patients who underwent EC at L2K versus G2K, respectively. Conclusion: Although weight gain may be an important indicator of perioperative nutrition status, this study shows that weight alone should not preclude otherwise appropriate patients from undergoing EC.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a commonly performed bariatric procedure. At our institution, two vessel sealing devices, Thunderbeat^® (Olympus) and Maryland LigaSure™ (Covidien) are utilized for intraoperative dissection. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary SG from July 2013 through August 2022 was performed to evaluate postoperative bleeding (POB) rates between the two devices. The primary outcome measured was POB as defined by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), with secondary outcomes including reoperation, source of bleed, and overall safety. Results: A total of 8157 underwent SG. Average BMI and age were 43.2 kg/m² and 37.1 years, respectively. A total of 6600 (80.9%) were female. Thunderbeat^® was utilized in 5143 (63%) cases and Maryland LigaSure™ was used in 3014 (37%) cases. There was no significant difference in overall bleeding between the Thunderbeat^® (18/5143, .35%) and the Maryland LigaSure™ (19/3014, .63%; P = .0689). However, there was a difference noted when comparing reoperation for bleeding between Thunderbeat^® (9/5143, .17%) and Maryland LigaSure™ (13/3014, .43%; P = .0291). Furthermore, the location of bleeding in the reoperations was more common from the cut edge of the mesentery compared to the staple line with the Maryland LigaSure™ versus the Thunderbeat^® (P = .038). Conclusions: The Thunderbeat^® device is comparatively more hemostatic than the Maryland LigaSure™ for SG. The location of postoperative bleed may be related to vessel sealing devices used.

Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of robotic assisted low anterior resection with diverting loop ileostomy (LARDLI) for low and mid rectal cancer performed by novice in robotic-assisted surgery colorectal surgeon in a public hospital with limited access to the robotic platform. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all low and mid rectal cancer robotic-assisted operations was conducted. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon with a once per week access to the Da Vinci^® Si™ Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical Inc. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were reviewed. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was utilized to analyze learning curve for operative time. Results: A total of 107 consecutive patients who underwent LARDLI for lower and mid rectal cancer between November 2011 and July 2020 were included in the analysis. The median patients' age was 65 (range, 32-85) years, 72% were males (n = 77), and 91% (n = 97) received neoadjuvant therapy. Median operative time was 295.5 (range, 180-551) minutes. The conversion rate was 3.7% (n = 4). Median length of hospital stay was 6 (range, 1-41) days. There were 35 (32.7%) postoperative complications, of these 7 (6.5%) were major complications (≥Grade 3, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification). There was only one intraoperative complication (.9%). CUSUM analysis showed that the learning curve was 49 cases to achieve a plateau. Conclusions: The learning curve of robotic assisted low anterior resection for lower and mid rectal cancer for a novice in robotic surgery colorectal surgeon with limited access to the robotic platform is 49 cases. Surgeon and operative team dedication, alongside sufficient hospital support, may lower the number of cases of the learning curve.

Introduction: The ligamentum teres hepatis may block the field of vision during totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (TLG), especially in patients with obesity. Aim: We used electrocautery to increase the visual field of TLG by shrinking the ligamentum teres hepatis. This procedure is termed electro-vaporization of the ligamentum teres hepatis (EVLTH). Methods: Patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥24 who underwent total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) or total laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. According to the scope of gastrectomy and whether the patients underwent EVLTH, the patients were divided into the TLDG-EVLTH, TLDG-NEVLTH, TLTG-EVLTH, and TLTG-NEVLTH groups. The clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and pathological features were compared between the TLDG-EVLTH and TLDG-NEVLTH groups and the TLTG-EVLTH and TLTG-NEVLTH groups. Results: This study included 65 patients who underwent TLDG (EVLTH: NEVLTH = 29:36) and 32 patients who underwent TLTG (EVLTH:NEVLTH = 15:17). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and pathological features between the TLDG-EVLTH and TLDG-NEVLTH groups. However, the operation time in the TLTG-EVLTH group was significantly shorter than that in the TLTG-NEVLTH group, and the difference was statistically significant, although differences in other data were not statistically significant. Conclusions: EVLTH is a simple and safe procedure that reduces the operation time of TLTG in patients who are overweight and enhances the field of vision of TLG.

Introduction: Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is a common complication in advanced stage upper gastrointestinal malignancies. The symptoms of severe nausea and protracted vomiting can lead to a decline in quality of life and cachexia. Symptoms of GOO can be effectively managed with either operative or nonoperative palliative interventions. In our article, we aim to compare laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (GJ) to endoscopic stenting as palliative interventions for GOO. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the charts of patients who underwent palliative procedure for gastric outlet obstruction. Group I included patients who underwent endoscopic stenting, and group II patients underwent Laparoscopic GJ. The groups' demographics (age, gender), length of procedure, length of stay, days to oral intake, overall survival, complications rate, and 30-day mortality rates were compared. Results: Overall, 38 patients were included in the study. Nineteen patients underwent endoscopic stenting and 19 underwent laparoscopic GJ. Comparing the groups, no significant differences were noted. Surgical time was significantly longer than the endoscopic procedures (83 minutes versus 25 minutes, P = .001). No significant differences were noted in days of oral intake initiation, overall survival and 30-day mortality rates. Five patients in the stenting group had complications (26.3%) versus none in the surgical group (P = .046). No postoperative complications were noted. Conclusion: Laparoscopic GJ is a safe and feasible treatment for GOO, demonstrating early resumption of oral intake. The relative short hospital stay, combined with an encouraging postoperative complications profile and low reintervention rate, should be kept in mind especially among patients with longer life expectancy.

Background: Diastasis recti (DR) is a common condition, especially in women after pregnancy, often associated with concomitant hernia defects and defined as a rupture of the midline and a separation of the rectus muscle more than 2 cm. Symptoms related to this are low back pain, urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse, as well as abdominal bulging and core instability. We analyzed clinical and functional outcomes after treatment of DR alone or associated with midline hernias in 219 patients who underwent a midline reconstruction using miSAR^® technique (minimally invasive stapled abdominal wall reconstruction). Methods: Between April 2019 and April 2022, 219 patients were treated with miSAR^®. All patients were requested to quantify preoperative and postoperative functional symptoms (urinary incontinence, low back pain, abdominal swelling, and respiratory distress). Results: Twenty-seven men and 192 women underwent the miSAR^® technique. The mean body mass index was 23.9 kg/m². We performed the miSAR^® technique in patients affected by incisional midline hernia and umbilical hernia alone or associated with DR. Composite mesh was used in 91.8% of cases. The average operating time was 90 minutes. Seven percent of the patients had postoperative complications, including two retromuscular hematomas, two retromuscular seromas, and one postoperative bleeding event. Two patients were readmitted for bowel obstruction. After surgery, there was symptomatic improvement in urinary incontinence, low back pain, respiratory symptoms, and abdominal swelling; this improvement was confirmed at 6 months and at 1- and 2-year follow-up. At the 1-year follow-up, the overall recurrence rate was 2.83%. Conclusion: miSAR^® is a feasible and effective technique and shows promising results in the treatment of DR and ventral hernia. Possible enhancements include use of preoperative Botox to treat defects larger than 6 cm. Multicentric analysis is needed to validate the technique, and longer follow-up is required to assess the recurrence rate.

Background: Surgical correction is the main line of treatment for the congenital disorder Hirschsprung's disease (HD). Laparoscopic techniques proved their safety and efficacy in previous studies. LigaSure™ is the gold standard for colorectal dissection. However, other sealing methods could be used during the unavailability of LigaSure. Purpose: This study aimed to assess the safety profile of the hook diathermy technique compared to LigaSure in colorectal dissection during laparoscopic-assisted pull-through for HD. Materials and Methods: This case-control study was held in the pediatric surgery department at Assiut University Hospitals between September 2017 and January 2023. The study included 57 HD patients who were surgically operated on during a laparoscopic-assisted pull-through. They were divided into 2 groups according to the sealing methods: the ligasure group included 25 patients, and the hook diathermy group included 32 patients. Results: Both groups had no statistically significant differences regarding age, sex, or weight. The transition zone was present in all patients, and most transition zones were rectosigmoid. No cases reported intraoperative blood transfusion or conversion to an open or transanal approach. Minimum intraoperative blood loss was reported in both groups, with no significant differences. As regards postoperative complications, including bleeding, leakage, perianal excoriation, and enterocolitis, no significant differences between both groups were found. Conclusion: The LigaSure and hook diathermy techniques are safe and effective sealing methods for colorectal dissection during laparoscopic-assisted pull-through for HD.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in cholecystectomy, comparing it with standard care. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in December 2023, using globally recognized databases such as PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Various parameters were compared using Review Manager software. This study was duly registered with PROSPERO (CRD420223). Results: The meta-analysis included nine studies, encompassing a total of 1920 patients. The findings revealed that the ERAS group, in comparison to traditional care, experienced shorter hospitalization periods (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.98 to -0.47; P = .001), lower visual analog scale at 24 hours (WMD: -1.10, 95% CI: -1.30 to -0.90; P < .00001), faster time to first flatus (WMD: -4.48, 95% CI: -4.50 to -4.46; P < .00001), and reduced operative times (WMD: -9.94, 95% CI: -17.88 to -0.96; P = .03). In addition, there was a notable decrease in instances of postoperative nausea and vomiting (odds ratio [OR]: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.74; P = .002). No significant differences were observed in readmission rates, blood loss, postoperative complications, or bile leakage between the two care methods. Conclusions: This study substantiates that the ERAS protocol is an advantageous perioperative care strategy for patients undergoing cholecystectomy. It significantly outperforms traditional care in reducing the length of stay, decreasing the likelihood of postoperative nausea/vomiting, alleviating postoperative pain, and accelerating the time to the first flatus. These findings highlight the effectiveness of ERAS in enhancing patient outcomes in cholecystectomy.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the educational quality and appropriateness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube using the LAParoscopicsurgery Video EducationalGuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria. It focuses on understanding the role of online resources in medical education and objectively assessing their quality. Methods: A search was conducted on YouTube™ for "laparoscopic radical nephrectomy" on August 15, 2023, leading to the selection of the first 125 videos. Videos were chosen based on length (over 1 minute), content (laparoscopic radical nephrectomy), language (English), and nonindustry sponsorship. The LAP-VEGaS criteria, encompassing 16 items under five main categories: video introduction, case presentation, procedures, outcomes, and educational content, were used for evaluation, assigning 0 or 1 point per criterion. Results: Out of 100 videos meeting the criteria, they were divided into two groups: personal uploads by expert surgeons (Group-1) and institutional uploads by hospitals and organizations (Group-2). Group-2 videos had longer durations and higher LAP-VEGaS scores. The transperitoneal approach was preferred in 88% of the videos, and 84% were right laparoscopic nephrectomies. Group-2 had significantly higher LAP-VEGaS scores (6.3 ± 2.2) compared with Group-1 (4 ± 2.1) (P < 0,001). The number of videos published over the years increased, while LAP-VEGaS scores fluctuated. Conclusion: Assessing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy videos on YouTube™ using the LAP-VEGaS criteria helped understand the role of online sources in medical education. Institutional uploads were found to be more successful in educational aspects, emphasizing the need for continuous quality review of online medical education materials. This study also guides how to evaluate and improve medical education materials on online platforms.