首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Improving Procedural Efficiency in Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of Intubation Time and Success Rates Across Five Techniques. 提高直接经口胆道镜检查的操作效率:五种技术插管时间和成功率的回顾性分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-06 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251385767
Wojciech Ciesielski, Tomasz Klimczak, Kacper Pawlak, Anna Sawina, Michał Kulig, Marta Cichończyk, Adam Durczyński, Janusz Strzelczyk, Piotr Hogendorf

Background: Direct peroral cholangioscopy (DPOC) offers enhanced visualization and therapeutic capabilities in biliary tract procedures. However, comparative data on intubation methods and procedural efficiency remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the success rate, complication rate, and intubation time across five different biliary intubation techniques used in DPOC. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 36 consecutive patients who underwent DPOC between December 2021 and March 2024. Indications included cholelithiasis, cholangiocarcinoma, proximal migration of biliary prostheses, and self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) occlusion. Five intubation methods were assessed: freehand, freehand with overtube, intraductal balloon, intraductal balloon with overtube, and intraductal balloon with overtube plus SEMS. Primary outcomes were technical success, intubation time, and complications. Results: All 36 procedures achieved successful biliary intubation (100% technical success) with no reported complications (0%). Mean intubation time differed significantly between methods (P < .001), with the shortest time observed in the intraductal balloon group (mean 73.3 seconds) and the longest in the freehand group (mean 202.25 seconds). No significant differences in intubation time were observed across clinical indications (P = .31). Conclusions: DPOC is a safe and effective procedure for various biliary pathologies, with accessory-assisted methods-particularly balloon-based techniques-demonstrating greater procedural efficiency. These findings support broader adoption of DPOC and tailored selection of intubation strategies based on anatomical and clinical context.

背景:直接经口胆道镜检查(DPOC)在胆道手术中提供了增强的可视化和治疗能力。然而,关于插管方法和程序效率的比较数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估五种不同胆道插管技术在DPOC中的成功率、并发症发生率和插管时间。方法:本回顾性研究分析了2021年12月至2024年3月期间36例连续接受DPOC的患者。适应症包括胆石症、胆管癌、胆道假体近端移位和自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)闭塞。评估五种插管方法:徒手、徒手加管上插管、导管内球囊加管上插管、导管内球囊加管上插管、导管内球囊加管上插管加SEMS。主要结果为技术成功、插管时间和并发症。结果:36例胆道插管均成功(100%技术成功率),无并发症报告(0%)。两种方法平均插管时间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),管内球囊组最短(平均73.3秒),徒手组最长(平均202.25秒)。不同临床指征插管时间无显著差异(P = 0.31)。结论:DPOC是一种安全有效的治疗各种胆道疾病的方法,辅助辅助方法-特别是球囊技术-显示出更高的手术效率。这些发现支持更广泛地采用DPOC,并根据解剖和临床情况量身定制插管策略。
{"title":"Improving Procedural Efficiency in Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy: A Retrospective Analysis of Intubation Time and Success Rates Across Five Techniques.","authors":"Wojciech Ciesielski, Tomasz Klimczak, Kacper Pawlak, Anna Sawina, Michał Kulig, Marta Cichończyk, Adam Durczyński, Janusz Strzelczyk, Piotr Hogendorf","doi":"10.1177/10926429251385767","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10926429251385767","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Direct peroral cholangioscopy (DPOC) offers enhanced visualization and therapeutic capabilities in biliary tract procedures. However, comparative data on intubation methods and procedural efficiency remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the success rate, complication rate, and intubation time across five different biliary intubation techniques used in DPOC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This retrospective study analyzed 36 consecutive patients who underwent DPOC between December 2021 and March 2024. Indications included cholelithiasis, cholangiocarcinoma, proximal migration of biliary prostheses, and self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) occlusion. Five intubation methods were assessed: freehand, freehand with overtube, intraductal balloon, intraductal balloon with overtube, and intraductal balloon with overtube plus SEMS. Primary outcomes were technical success, intubation time, and complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> All 36 procedures achieved successful biliary intubation (100% technical success) with no reported complications (0%). Mean intubation time differed significantly between methods (<i>P</i> < .001), with the shortest time observed in the intraductal balloon group (mean 73.3 seconds) and the longest in the freehand group (mean 202.25 seconds). No significant differences in intubation time were observed across clinical indications (<i>P</i> = .31). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> DPOC is a safe and effective procedure for various biliary pathologies, with accessory-assisted methods-particularly balloon-based techniques-demonstrating greater procedural efficiency. These findings support broader adoption of DPOC and tailored selection of intubation strategies based on anatomical and clinical context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"930-936"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145240192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy. 机器人辅助远端胃切除术与腹腔镜胃切除术短期疗效比较
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251383719
Qiancheng Wang, Shiyang Jin, Zeshen Wang, Pengcheng Sun, Yuming Ju, Guanyu Zhu, Kuan Wang

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of a novel robotic surgical system-the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01)-for treating clinical stage I-III distal gastric cancer (GC) by comparing it to conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). Methods: From September to December 2023, 15 patients with distal GC underwent gastrectomies using the KD-SR-01 (KD group). An additional 15 cases of LG performed by the same surgeon during the same period were selected as the control group (LG group). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: Both groups achieved the same surgical success rate, with no conversions to open surgery. The KD group exhibited significantly less blood loss (30 [20-60] mL versus 50 [30-200] mL, P < .001) and reported a lighter workload (27.5 ± 3.0 versus 30.1 ± 2.6, P = .011) compared to the LG group. Although the operation time in the KD group was significantly longer (213.3 ± 30.1 minutes versus 166.0 ± 32.8 minutes, P < .001), it was not significantly different from the LG group when excluding the device docking time of KD-SR-01 (179.7 ± 24.5 minutes versus 166.0 ± 32.8 minutes, P = .207). There were no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (7.7 ± 1.5 days versus 7.3 ± .8 days, P = .357) and complication rates (26.7% versus 40.0%, P = .700) between the two groups. Conclusion: The KD-SR-01 is safe and effective for treating distal GC and may be a viable alternative to conventional LG.

目的:本研究旨在通过与传统腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)进行比较,评估新型机器人手术系统——康多手术机器人-01 (KD-SR-01)治疗临床I-III期远端胃癌(GC)的有效性、安全性和可行性。方法:2023年9月至12月,15例胃癌远端患者行KD- sr -01胃切除术(KD组)。另外选择同一医生同期行LG手术15例作为对照组(LG组)。对两组术前、术中、术后资料进行分析比较。结果:两组手术成功率相同,无中转开腹手术。与LG组相比,KD组的失血量明显减少(30 [20-60]mL vs 50 [30-200] mL, P < .001),工作量更轻(27.5±3.0 vs 30.1±2.6,P = .011)。虽然KD组的手术时间明显长于LG组(213.3±30.1 min比166.0±32.8 min, P < 0.001),但排除KD- sr -01的设备对接时间后,KD组与LG组的差异无统计学意义(179.7±24.5 min比166.0±32.8 min, P = 0.207)。术后住院时间(7.7±1.5天)和(7.3±)天无显著差异。8天,P = 0.357),两组并发症发生率(26.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.700)。结论:KD-SR-01治疗远端GC安全有效,可作为常规LG的替代方法。
{"title":"Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy Using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 System and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.","authors":"Qiancheng Wang, Shiyang Jin, Zeshen Wang, Pengcheng Sun, Yuming Ju, Guanyu Zhu, Kuan Wang","doi":"10.1177/10926429251383719","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10926429251383719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of a novel robotic surgical system-the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01)-for treating clinical stage I-III distal gastric cancer (GC) by comparing it to conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From September to December 2023, 15 patients with distal GC underwent gastrectomies using the KD-SR-01 (KD group). An additional 15 cases of LG performed by the same surgeon during the same period were selected as the control group (LG group). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed and compared between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Both groups achieved the same surgical success rate, with no conversions to open surgery. The KD group exhibited significantly less blood loss (30 [20-60] mL versus 50 [30-200] mL, <i>P</i> < .001) and reported a lighter workload (27.5 ± 3.0 versus 30.1 ± 2.6, <i>P</i> = .011) compared to the LG group. Although the operation time in the KD group was significantly longer (213.3 ± 30.1 minutes versus 166.0 ± 32.8 minutes, <i>P</i> < .001), it was not significantly different from the LG group when excluding the device docking time of KD-SR-01 (179.7 ± 24.5 minutes versus 166.0 ± 32.8 minutes, <i>P</i> = .207). There were no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (7.7 ± 1.5 days versus 7.3 ± .8 days, <i>P</i> = .357) and complication rates (26.7% versus 40.0%, <i>P</i> = .700) between the two groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The KD-SR-01 is safe and effective for treating distal GC and may be a viable alternative to conventional LG.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"940-948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145187381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementing the da Vinci SP® Robotic Platform in Pediatric General Surgery: Improved Single-Site Surgery. 达芬奇SP®机器人平台在儿科普外科中的应用:改进的单部位手术。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-29 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251392856
Ryan T Davis, Katelyn R Ward, Ibrahim B Baida, Jesse Selber, Mohammad Jafri, Pavan Brahmamdam, Begum Akay, Anthony Stallion, Nathan M Novotny

Introduction: Single-port robotic surgery (SPRS) provides a single-incision alternative to multiport robotic surgery (MPRS), preserving benefits such as enhanced visualization, dexterity, and ergonomics while reducing the number of incisions. Earlier single-site platforms were limited by instrument mobility and steep learning curves. The da Vinci SP® system addresses these limitations with independently articulated robotic arms that improve precision and maneuverability. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 5 adolescent patients who underwent SPRS using the da Vinci SP® system at our institution between November 2024 and March 2025. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed, with follow-up conducted in the clinic within 3 weeks. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Results: Procedures included cholecystectomy (n = 3), femoral hernia repair (n = 1), and left ovarian cystectomy (n = 1). All procedures were completed via a single 20-25 mm umbilical incision without additional ports or conversion to open. The mean age was 16.4 years (range: 14-18), and the mean weight was 60.8 kg (range: 45.5-77.6). Console times ranged from 32 to 54 minutes (mean 41). All patients were discharged the same day, received no narcotics, and experienced no postoperative complications at 3 weeks. Conclusion: SPRS using the da Vinci SP® system appears technically feasible in carefully selected adolescent patients, with favorable short-term outcomes in this small case series. While encouraging, these results should be interpreted as preliminary. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to determine long-term safety, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

简介:单孔机器人手术(SPRS)提供了多孔机器人手术(MPRS)的单切口替代方案,在减少切口数量的同时保留了诸如增强可视化,灵活性和人体工程学等优点。早期的单站点平台受限于仪器的移动性和陡峭的学习曲线。达芬奇SP®系统通过独立铰接的机械臂解决了这些限制,提高了精度和机动性。方法:我们回顾性分析了2024年11月至2025年3月期间在我院使用达芬奇SP®系统接受SPRS的5例青少年患者。评估围手术期和术后结果,并于3周内进行临床随访。数据采用Microsoft Excel进行分析。结果:手术包括胆囊切除术(n = 3)、股疝修补术(n = 1)和左卵巢囊肿切除术(n = 1)。所有手术均通过单个20- 25mm脐带切口完成,无需额外的端口或转换打开。平均年龄16.4岁(范围:14 ~ 18岁),平均体重60.8 kg(范围:45.5 ~ 77.6)。控制台时间从32到54分钟不等(平均41分钟)。所有患者均于当日出院,未使用麻醉剂,术后3周无并发症发生。结论:在精心挑选的青少年患者中,使用达芬奇SP®系统的SPRS在技术上是可行的,在这个小病例系列中具有良好的短期预后。虽然这些结果令人鼓舞,但应被解释为初步结果。进一步的研究需要更大的队列和更长时间的随访来确定长期的安全性、结果和成本效益。
{"title":"Implementing the da Vinci SP® Robotic Platform in Pediatric General Surgery: Improved Single-Site Surgery.","authors":"Ryan T Davis, Katelyn R Ward, Ibrahim B Baida, Jesse Selber, Mohammad Jafri, Pavan Brahmamdam, Begum Akay, Anthony Stallion, Nathan M Novotny","doi":"10.1177/10926429251392856","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10926429251392856","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Single-port robotic surgery (SPRS) provides a single-incision alternative to multiport robotic surgery (MPRS), preserving benefits such as enhanced visualization, dexterity, and ergonomics while reducing the number of incisions. Earlier single-site platforms were limited by instrument mobility and steep learning curves. The da Vinci SP® system addresses these limitations with independently articulated robotic arms that improve precision and maneuverability. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed 5 adolescent patients who underwent SPRS using the da Vinci SP® system at our institution between November 2024 and March 2025. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed, with follow-up conducted in the clinic within 3 weeks. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Procedures included cholecystectomy (<i>n</i> = 3), femoral hernia repair (<i>n</i> = 1), and left ovarian cystectomy (<i>n</i> = 1). All procedures were completed via a single 20-25 mm umbilical incision without additional ports or conversion to open. The mean age was 16.4 years (range: 14-18), and the mean weight was 60.8 kg (range: 45.5-77.6). Console times ranged from 32 to 54 minutes (mean 41). All patients were discharged the same day, received no narcotics, and experienced no postoperative complications at 3 weeks. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> SPRS using the da Vinci SP® system appears technically feasible in carefully selected adolescent patients, with favorable short-term outcomes in this small case series. While encouraging, these results should be interpreted as preliminary. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to determine long-term safety, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"986-990"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preventing Postsurgical Lymphoceles: Efficacy of Preventing Lymphocele Ensuring Absorption Transperitoneally Technique in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. 预防术后淋巴囊肿:经腹腔技术在机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中预防淋巴囊肿确保吸收的效果。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-24 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251381449
Bulent Onal, Mehmet Hamza Gultekin, Kadir Can Sahin, Ahmet Vural, Goktug Kalender, Emre Akkus

Background: Lymphocele is an important condition commonly seen in the follow-up of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for prostate cancer. Since the formation and treatment of lymphocele may have negative consequences in terms of patient-care and health expenditure. Several techniques have been used to prevent lymphocele. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the previously described preventing lymphocele ensuring absorption transperitoneally (P.L.E.A.T.) technique and compare the outcomes of patients who underwent this technique. Methodology: The data of patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with ePLND for prostate cancer between 2017 and 2023 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the application of the P.L.E.A.T. technique in their operations. All patients were followed up with the same protocol. Patient characteristics and postoperative follow-up data were statistically analyzed. Results: Data of 78 patients (26 patients in the P.L.E.A.T. group and 52 patients in control group) were evaluated retrospectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen levels, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, D'Amico risk classification, or the number of lymph nodes removed. Analysis of postoperative data revealed statistically significant differences between the two groups in total amount of drainage (P < .05), drain removal day (P < .05), and length of hospital stay (P < .05). Conclusions: Our experience with the P.L.E.A.T. technique showed potential advantages in line with the literature, with a considerable reduction in total drain amount, drain removal day, and length of stay.

背景:淋巴囊肿是前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术和扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)患者随访中常见的重要情况。因为淋巴囊肿的形成和治疗可能在病人护理和卫生支出方面产生负面影响。已经使用了几种技术来预防淋巴囊肿。在这项研究中,我们的目的是研究先前描述的防止淋巴囊肿经腹腔吸收(P.L.E.A.T.)技术的有效性,并比较接受该技术的患者的结果。方法:回顾性分析我院2017年至2023年接受机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术联合ePLND治疗前列腺癌的患者资料。根据P.L.E.A.T.技术在手术中的应用情况将患者分为两组。所有患者均采用相同的治疗方案进行随访。对患者特征及术后随访资料进行统计学分析。结果:回顾性分析78例患者的资料,其中P.L.E.A.T.组26例,对照组52例。两组在人口统计学和临床特征方面无统计学差异,包括年龄、前列腺特异性抗原水平、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分、D'Amico风险分类或淋巴结切除数量。术后数据分析显示,两组患者引流总量(P < 0.05)、引流天数(P < 0.05)、住院时间(P < 0.05)差异均有统计学意义。结论:我们对P.L.E.A.T.技术的经验显示出与文献一致的潜在优势,可以显著减少总引流量、引流天数和住院时间。
{"title":"Preventing Postsurgical Lymphoceles: Efficacy of Preventing Lymphocele Ensuring Absorption Transperitoneally Technique in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.","authors":"Bulent Onal, Mehmet Hamza Gultekin, Kadir Can Sahin, Ahmet Vural, Goktug Kalender, Emre Akkus","doi":"10.1177/10926429251381449","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10926429251381449","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Lymphocele is an important condition commonly seen in the follow-up of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for prostate cancer. Since the formation and treatment of lymphocele may have negative consequences in terms of patient-care and health expenditure. Several techniques have been used to prevent lymphocele. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of the previously described preventing lymphocele ensuring absorption transperitoneally (P.L.E.A.T.) technique and compare the outcomes of patients who underwent this technique. <b><i>Methodology:</i></b> The data of patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with ePLND for prostate cancer between 2017 and 2023 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the application of the P.L.E.A.T. technique in their operations. All patients were followed up with the same protocol. Patient characteristics and postoperative follow-up data were statistically analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Data of 78 patients (26 patients in the P.L.E.A.T. group and 52 patients in control group) were evaluated retrospectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen levels, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, D'Amico risk classification, or the number of lymph nodes removed. Analysis of postoperative data revealed statistically significant differences between the two groups in total amount of drainage (<i>P</i> < .05), drain removal day (<i>P</i> < .05), and length of hospital stay (<i>P</i> < .05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our experience with the P.L.E.A.T. technique showed potential advantages in line with the literature, with a considerable reduction in total drain amount, drain removal day, and length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"924-929"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Same-Day Repair of Recto-Vaginal Fistula Using the Robotic Trans-Anal Minimally Invasive Technique How We Do It. 使用机器人经肛门微创技术当天修复直肠阴道瘘我们是怎么做的。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251399211
Sarmad Mohammed Salih, Jami Zajicek, Ahmed Allawi

Background: Traditional open surgical repairs, including flap techniques, are associated with high recurrence rates and significant morbidity. Robotic-assisted techniques have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional methods due to improved visualization, precision, and reduced postoperative complications. The robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) technique offers a new route for rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair, providing enhanced dexterity and access through the transanal approach. Methods: An R-TAMIS technique was employed for same-day repair of RVF using the da Vinci Xi® system. After bowel preparation and prophylactic antibiotics, the patient was positioned in prone Jackknife. The GelPOINT Path was used for transanal access, and robotic ports were placed. The fistula tract was identified and dissected circumferentially. The vaginal wall was closed with absorbable barbed sutures, reinforced with fibrin sealant and acellular dermal mesh. The rectal wall was then closed, and patency was confirmed via endoscopic inspection. Results: The procedure was well tolerated, and the patient was discharged the next day. Minimal postoperative pain was reported but didn't require analgesics. No major complications were observed in the immediate postoperative period. The robotic approach provided enhanced visualization and dexterity, facilitating precise dissection and suturing. The technique has already been successfully applied to benign RVFs and select rectourethral fistulas. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted transanal repair using the R-TAMIS technique is a feasible and effective minimally invasive option for selected patients with benign RVFs. With proper patient selection and dedicated surgical technique, this approach may reduce morbidity and improve outcomes compared to traditional open or laparoscopic methods.

背景:传统的开放手术修复,包括皮瓣技术,具有高复发率和显著的发病率。机器人辅助技术已成为传统方法的有希望的替代方案,因为它提高了可视化、精度和减少了术后并发症。机器人经肛门微创手术(R-TAMIS)技术为直肠阴道瘘(RVF)修复提供了新的途径,提供了增强的灵活性和通过经肛门入路的进入。方法:采用R-TAMIS技术,采用da Vinci Xi®系统进行裂谷热当日修复。在肠道准备和预防性抗生素治疗后,患者俯卧位。GelPOINT路径用于经肛门通路,放置机器人端口。确定瘘道并沿周切开。阴道壁用可吸收的倒刺缝合线闭合,用纤维蛋白密封剂和脱细胞真皮网加固。然后闭合直肠壁,经内镜检查确认通畅。结果:患者耐受良好,次日出院。术后疼痛最小,但不需要镇痛药。术后未见重大并发症。机器人方法提供了增强的可视化和灵活性,便于精确的解剖和缝合。该技术已经成功地应用于良性裂谷裂谷和选择直肠尿道瘘。结论:机器人辅助经肛门修复采用R-TAMIS技术是一种可行和有效的微创选择良性RVFs患者。通过适当的患者选择和专门的手术技术,与传统的开放或腹腔镜方法相比,这种方法可以降低发病率并改善预后。
{"title":"Same-Day Repair of Recto-Vaginal Fistula Using the Robotic Trans-Anal Minimally Invasive Technique <i>How We Do It</i>.","authors":"Sarmad Mohammed Salih, Jami Zajicek, Ahmed Allawi","doi":"10.1177/10926429251399211","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10926429251399211","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Traditional open surgical repairs, including flap techniques, are associated with high recurrence rates and significant morbidity. Robotic-assisted techniques have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional methods due to improved visualization, precision, and reduced postoperative complications. The robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) technique offers a new route for rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair, providing enhanced dexterity and access through the transanal approach. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> An R-TAMIS technique was employed for same-day repair of RVF using the da Vinci Xi® system. After bowel preparation and prophylactic antibiotics, the patient was positioned in prone Jackknife. The GelPOINT Path was used for transanal access, and robotic ports were placed. The fistula tract was identified and dissected circumferentially. The vaginal wall was closed with absorbable barbed sutures, reinforced with fibrin sealant and acellular dermal mesh. The rectal wall was then closed, and patency was confirmed via endoscopic inspection. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The procedure was well tolerated, and the patient was discharged the next day. Minimal postoperative pain was reported but didn't require analgesics. No major complications were observed in the immediate postoperative period. The robotic approach provided enhanced visualization and dexterity, facilitating precise dissection and suturing. The technique has already been successfully applied to benign RVFs and select rectourethral fistulas. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Robotic-assisted transanal repair using the R-TAMIS technique is a feasible and effective minimally invasive option for selected patients with benign RVFs. With proper patient selection and dedicated surgical technique, this approach may reduce morbidity and improve outcomes compared to traditional open or laparoscopic methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"970-973"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating Bariatric Surgery in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. 评估60岁及以上患者的减肥手术:袖胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的回顾性多中心比较。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251401463
Muhammed Said Dalkılıç, Kenan Yüce, Christophe Adil Fernandez Zapater, Neslihan Özdemir, Hafize Kovancı, Mahamat Bechır Saleh Oumar, Abdullah Şişik

Background: This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients aged 60 and older, focusing on postoperative weight loss, improvement in obesity-related comorbidities, and perioperative outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from three bariatric surgery centers with surgeries performed between January 2019 and September 2024. The study included patients aged ≥60 years who underwent either LSG or RYGB. The primary outcome was the comparison of weight loss metrics (excess weight loss [%EWL] and total weight loss [%TWL]) between LSG and RYGB. Secondary outcomes included the remission or improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension (HTN), 30-day postoperative complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Results: A total of 168 patients aged ≥60 who underwent LSG (n = 130) or RYGB (n = 38) were included. Both procedures resulted in similar weight loss outcomes, with a median %EWL of 58.6% for LSG and 61.2% for RYGB. The median %TWL was 23.1% for LSG and 26% for RYGB, with no significant differences between the groups (P = .275). The operative time was significantly shorter for LSG (60 minutes versus 110 minutes for RYGB, P < .001), and LSG patients had a shorter hospital stay (2 versus 3 days, P < .001). The 30-day complication rate was low for both groups, with no significant difference in complications between LSG and RYGB. Regarding comorbidity resolution, 90.7% of patients with T2DM and 93.6% with HTN experienced improvement or remission. Complete remission was achieved in 39% of all T2DM cases (37.5% in LSG, 42.9% in RYGB) and in 33% of all HTN cases (33.3% in LSG, 31.6% in RYGB), with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: Bariatric surgery appears safe in older adults when guided by careful patient and procedure selection through multidisciplinary assessment. Both LSG and RYGB yielded comparable weight loss and remission outcomes for T2DM and HTN in this population.

背景:本研究旨在比较60岁及以上患者腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)的安全性和有效性,重点关注术后体重减轻、肥胖相关合并症的改善和围手术期结局。方法:回顾性分析了2019年1月至2024年9月间三家减肥手术中心的手术数据。该研究纳入了年龄≥60岁的接受LSG或RYGB治疗的患者。主要结局是比较LSG组和RYGB组的体重减轻指标(超重体重减轻[%EWL]和总体重减轻[%TWL])。次要结局包括2型糖尿病(T2DM)和高血压(HTN)的缓解或改善、术后30天并发症、手术时间和住院时间。结果:共纳入168例≥60岁接受LSG (n = 130)或RYGB (n = 38)的患者。两种方法的减肥结果相似,LSG组的平均EWL为58.6%,RYGB组为61.2%。LSG组的TWL中位数为23.1%,RYGB组为26%,两组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.275)。LSG组的手术时间明显短于RYGB组(60分钟vs 110分钟,P < 0.001), LSG组患者住院时间短于RYGB组(2天vs 3天,P < 0.001)。两组30天并发症发生率均较低,LSG组与RYGB组并发症发生率无显著差异。关于合并症的缓解,90.7%的T2DM患者和93.6%的HTN患者经历了改善或缓解。39%的T2DM患者(LSG组37.5%,RYGB组42.9%)和33%的HTN患者(LSG组33.3%,RYGB组31.6%)达到完全缓解,两组间无统计学差异。结论:通过多学科评估,在谨慎的患者和手术选择指导下,老年人减肥手术是安全的。在该人群中,LSG和RYGB对T2DM和HTN的体重减轻和缓解效果相当。
{"title":"Evaluating Bariatric Surgery in Patients Aged 60 Years and Older: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.","authors":"Muhammed Said Dalkılıç, Kenan Yüce, Christophe Adil Fernandez Zapater, Neslihan Özdemir, Hafize Kovancı, Mahamat Bechır Saleh Oumar, Abdullah Şişik","doi":"10.1177/10926429251401463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251401463","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients aged 60 and older, focusing on postoperative weight loss, improvement in obesity-related comorbidities, and perioperative outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a retrospective analysis of data from three bariatric surgery centers with surgeries performed between January 2019 and September 2024. The study included patients aged ≥60 years who underwent either LSG or RYGB. The primary outcome was the comparison of weight loss metrics (excess weight loss [%EWL] and total weight loss [%TWL]) between LSG and RYGB. Secondary outcomes included the remission or improvement of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension (HTN), 30-day postoperative complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 168 patients aged ≥60 who underwent LSG (<i>n</i> = 130) or RYGB (<i>n</i> = 38) were included. Both procedures resulted in similar weight loss outcomes, with a median %EWL of 58.6% for LSG and 61.2% for RYGB. The median %TWL was 23.1% for LSG and 26% for RYGB, with no significant differences between the groups (<i>P</i> = .275). The operative time was significantly shorter for LSG (60 minutes versus 110 minutes for RYGB, <i>P</i> < .001), and LSG patients had a shorter hospital stay (2 versus 3 days, <i>P</i> < .001). The 30-day complication rate was low for both groups, with no significant difference in complications between LSG and RYGB. Regarding comorbidity resolution, 90.7% of patients with T2DM and 93.6% with HTN experienced improvement or remission. Complete remission was achieved in 39% of all T2DM cases (37.5% in LSG, 42.9% in RYGB) and in 33% of all HTN cases (33.3% in LSG, 31.6% in RYGB), with no statistically significant differences between the groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Bariatric surgery appears safe in older adults when guided by careful patient and procedure selection through multidisciplinary assessment. Both LSG and RYGB yielded comparable weight loss and remission outcomes for T2DM and HTN in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extra Corporeal Knotting Approach Technique for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Simple and Cost-Effective Method for Mesh and Structure Fixation. 腹腔镜疝修补术的超体结入路技术:一种简单而经济的网状物和结构固定方法。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251397934
Shih-Hsien Wang, Ju-Bei Yen, Cheng-Chih Chang, Chung-Ming Yu, Hao-Chih Yang, Dong-Ru Ho

Background: We describe a novel extracorporeal knotting approach (ECKA) that enables secure mesh fixation via extracorporeal suture manipulation, anchoring the mesh firmly within the abdominal cavity. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 patients (14 males, 3 females) who underwent laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with mesh fixation using the ECKA technique. Key parameters included patient demographics, method of hernia repair (totally extraperitoneal [TEP] or transabdominal preperitoneal [TAPP]), laterality, and operative duration. Hernias were classified by procedure, with each side analyzed independently. Results: From April 2024 to July 2025, a total of 21 hernia procedures were performed on 17 patients using the ECKA technique. The average patient age was 70.3 years (range: 47.1-88.5 years), with a mean body weight of 65.9 kg. Of the hernia types, 15 were direct, 3 were indirect, and 3 were mixed. Laterality distribution was as follows: right-sided (n = 6), left-sided (n = 7), and bilateral (n = 4). Nine procedures utilized the TAPP approach, while 12 were performed using the TEP approach. The average operative time was 88.4 minutes (range: 60.4-145.4 minutes). Postoperative analgesia consisted of diclofenac sodium administered three times daily for three days. No recurrences were observed during a mean follow-up period of 10.3 months (range: 2-17 months). Conclusions: The ECKA technique provides a reproducible, minimally invasive solution for fixing mesh in direct, indirect, and combined hernias via either TEP or TAPP approaches. Its extracorporeal knotting system streamlines mesh fixation, ensures consistent clinical outcomes, and enhances operative efficiency across various hernia configurations.

背景:我们描述了一种新颖的体外打结方法(ECKA),通过体外缝合操作实现安全的网状物固定,将网状物牢固地固定在腹腔内。方法:回顾性分析采用ECKA技术行腹腔镜疝修补术的17例患者(男14例,女3例)。关键参数包括患者人口统计学特征、疝修补方法(全腹膜外疝修补术[TEP]或经腹膜前疝修补术[TAPP])、侧边性和手术时间。疝气按手术方式分类,每侧独立分析。结果:2024年4月至2025年7月,17例患者采用ECKA技术共行21例疝手术。患者平均年龄70.3岁(范围47.1-88.5岁),平均体重65.9 kg。直接型15例,间接型3例,混合型3例。侧位分布为右侧(n = 6)、左侧(n = 7)、双侧(n = 4)。9例采用TAPP入路,12例采用TEP入路。平均手术时间88.4 min (60.4 ~ 145.4 min)。术后镇痛包括双氯芬酸钠,每日三次,连用三天。平均随访10.3个月(2-17个月),无复发。结论:ECKA技术为通过TEP或TAPP入路直接、间接和联合疝固定补片提供了一种可重复、微创的解决方案。其体外打结系统简化了网状固定,确保了一致的临床结果,并提高了各种疝气配置的手术效率。
{"title":"Extra Corporeal Knotting Approach Technique for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Simple and Cost-Effective Method for Mesh and Structure Fixation.","authors":"Shih-Hsien Wang, Ju-Bei Yen, Cheng-Chih Chang, Chung-Ming Yu, Hao-Chih Yang, Dong-Ru Ho","doi":"10.1177/10926429251397934","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251397934","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> We describe a novel extracorporeal knotting approach (ECKA) that enables secure mesh fixation via extracorporeal suture manipulation, anchoring the mesh firmly within the abdominal cavity. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 17 patients (14 males, 3 females) who underwent laparoscopic herniorrhaphy with mesh fixation using the ECKA technique. Key parameters included patient demographics, method of hernia repair (totally extraperitoneal [TEP] or transabdominal preperitoneal [TAPP]), laterality, and operative duration. Hernias were classified by procedure, with each side analyzed independently. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From April 2024 to July 2025, a total of 21 hernia procedures were performed on 17 patients using the ECKA technique. The average patient age was 70.3 years (range: 47.1-88.5 years), with a mean body weight of 65.9 kg. Of the hernia types, 15 were direct, 3 were indirect, and 3 were mixed. Laterality distribution was as follows: right-sided (<i>n</i> = 6), left-sided (<i>n</i> = 7), and bilateral (<i>n</i> = 4). Nine procedures utilized the TAPP approach, while 12 were performed using the TEP approach. The average operative time was 88.4 minutes (range: 60.4-145.4 minutes). Postoperative analgesia consisted of diclofenac sodium administered three times daily for three days. No recurrences were observed during a mean follow-up period of 10.3 months (range: 2-17 months). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The ECKA technique provides a reproducible, minimally invasive solution for fixing mesh in direct, indirect, and combined hernias via either TEP or TAPP approaches. Its extracorporeal knotting system streamlines mesh fixation, ensures consistent clinical outcomes, and enhances operative efficiency across various hernia configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145566171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neonatal Intestinal Perforations: when Should We Perform a Rectal Biopsy to Rule Out Hirschsprung's Disease? 新生儿肠穿孔:何时进行直肠活检以排除先天性巨结肠?
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251396542
Özlem Balcı, Ayşe Karaman, Aslı Nur Abay, İbrahim Karaman

Background: Intestinal perforation (IP) is one of the most critical surgical emergencies in neonates. It most often occurs in premature infants, with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) as the leading cause. Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is another important etiology. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of HD among neonates with non-NEC IP and assessed the value of performing rectal biopsy in these patients. Methods: Neonates who were treated for non-NEC IPs between 2005 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical features, operative details, and rectal biopsy results were collected. These features were compared according to the histopathological results of rectal biopsy (aganglionic versus ganglionic). Results: Rectal biopsies were performed in 48 neonates with non-NEC IP (33 preterm [68.8%], 15 term [31.2%]). The most common perforation site was the ileum (52.4%). Rectal biopsy revealed aganglionosis in 12.5% of the patients. Gestational age was higher in aganglionic than ganglionic cases (36.7 versus 32.5 weeks; P = .026). The perforations were colonic in all aganglionic cases (n = 6) and 47.6% (n = 20) of the ganglionic cases (P = .025). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of considering HD in the differential diagnosis of neonatal IPs. Rectal biopsy should be considered in non-NEC perforations; particularly in term (or near-term) neonates and in cases of colonic perforation, to help identify underlying aganglionosis and guide timely management. Level of Evidence: Level 3 b.

背景:肠穿孔(IP)是新生儿最重要的外科急诊之一。它最常见于早产儿,坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)是主要原因。巨结肠病(HD)是另一个重要的病因。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查非nec IP新生儿HD的频率,并评估在这些患者中进行直肠活检的价值。方法:回顾性分析2005年至2021年间接受非nec型IPs治疗的新生儿。收集了人口统计学资料、临床特征、手术细节和直肠活检结果。根据直肠活检的组织病理学结果(神经节和神经节)对这些特征进行比较。结果:48例非nec性IP新生儿行直肠活检(早产儿33例[68.8%],足月15例[31.2%])。最常见的穿孔部位是回肠(52.4%)。直肠活检显示12.5%的患者有神经节增生。神经节结的胎龄高于神经节结的胎龄(36.7周比32.5周;P = 0.026)。所有神经节穿孔均为结肠穿孔(n = 6),其中47.6% (n = 20)为神经节穿孔(P = 0.025)。结论:本研究强调了在新生儿IPs鉴别诊断中考虑HD的重要性。非nec穿孔应考虑直肠活检;特别是在足月(或近期)新生儿和结肠穿孔的情况下,帮助识别潜在的神经节病并指导及时处理。证据等级:三级b。
{"title":"Neonatal Intestinal Perforations: when Should We Perform a Rectal Biopsy to Rule Out Hirschsprung's Disease?","authors":"Özlem Balcı, Ayşe Karaman, Aslı Nur Abay, İbrahim Karaman","doi":"10.1177/10926429251396542","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251396542","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Intestinal perforation (IP) is one of the most critical surgical emergencies in neonates. It most often occurs in premature infants, with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) as the leading cause. Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is another important etiology. In this study, we aimed to investigate the frequency of HD among neonates with non-NEC IP and assessed the value of performing rectal biopsy in these patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Neonates who were treated for non-NEC IPs between 2005 and 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical features, operative details, and rectal biopsy results were collected. These features were compared according to the histopathological results of rectal biopsy (aganglionic versus ganglionic). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Rectal biopsies were performed in 48 neonates with non-NEC IP (33 preterm [68.8%], 15 term [31.2%]). The most common perforation site was the ileum (52.4%). Rectal biopsy revealed aganglionosis in 12.5% of the patients. Gestational age was higher in aganglionic than ganglionic cases (36.7 versus 32.5 weeks; <i>P</i> = .026). The perforations were colonic in all aganglionic cases (<i>n</i> = 6) and 47.6% (<i>n</i> = 20) of the ganglionic cases (<i>P</i> = .025). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study highlights the importance of considering HD in the differential diagnosis of neonatal IPs. Rectal biopsy should be considered in non-NEC perforations; particularly in term (or near-term) neonates and in cases of colonic perforation, to help identify underlying aganglionosis and guide timely management. <b><i>Level of Evidence:</i></b> Level 3 b.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145543784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Technique for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Treatment in Children: A Comparative Study. 机器人与腹腔镜技术治疗儿童输尿管盂连接处梗阻的比较研究。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251396693
Carlo Maria Ferlini, Giulia Fusi, Michela Marinaro, Marta Gazzaneo, Simonetta Mencherini, Alessandro Raffaele, Piero Romano, Luigi Avolio, Massimo Garriboli, Giovanna Riccipetitoni, Mirko Bertozzi

Introduction: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children offers advantages over open surgical correction, including reduced hospitalization times and lower perioperative morbidity, but presents a long learning curve. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) offers the same advantages with reduced technical operative complexity but entails higher costs. No clear superiority of laparoscopy versus robotic surgery has been established. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study including pediatric patients who underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty at two tertiary-level centers, those at Evelina Children's Hospital in London (UK) receiving LP and those at Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia (Italy) undergoing RALP. Data concerning preoperative variables and obstruction severity; intraoperative variables and surgical techniques; degree of postoperative obstruction reduction, complications, and redo surgeries were analysed. Results: A total of 75 patients were included, with 47 undergoing LP and 28 receiving RALP, with similar preoperative characteristics across groups. The Anderson-Hynes surgical technique was employed in 71/75 cases (94.7%) with universal stent use. No conversions were recorded. Mean operatives times and postoperative length of stay were longer for RALP. Complications took place in 7/28 (25.0%) of RALP patients and 6/47 (12.7%) of LP patients. Redo surgery was needed for 1/28 (3.6%) RALP and 3/47 (6.4%) LP patients. These differences were not statistically significant. Symptoms resolution and postoperative pelvic diameter decrease were comparable between groups. Conclusions: RALP and LP appeared comparable in terms of safety and efficacy. Adoption of one technique over the other may be justified by the surgeon's preference and the availability of a robot.

导读:腹腔镜肾盂成形术(LP)治疗儿童肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻(UPJO)具有开放性手术矫正的优势,包括减少住院时间和降低围手术期发病率,但存在较长的学习曲线。机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALP)具有相同的优点,降低了技术操作的复杂性,但需要更高的成本。腹腔镜手术与机器人手术相比并没有明显的优势。材料和方法:我们进行了一项回顾性比较队列研究,包括在两个三级中心接受微创肾盂成形术的儿童患者,在伦敦(英国)的Evelina儿童医院接受LP的儿童患者和在帕维亚(意大利)的Policlinico San Matteo接受RALP的儿童患者。术前变量和梗阻严重程度数据;术中变量和手术技术;分析术后梗阻缩小程度、并发症及重手术情况。结果:共纳入75例患者,其中47例行LP, 28例行RALP,各组术前特征相似。75例患者中有71例(94.7%)采用安德森-海因斯手术技术。没有转换记录。RALP的平均手术次数和术后住院时间更长。RALP患者中有7/28(25.0%)出现并发症,LP患者中有6/47(12.7%)出现并发症。1/28 (3.6%) RALP和3/47 (6.4%)LP患者需要重做手术。这些差异没有统计学意义。两组间症状缓解和术后盆腔直径减小具有可比性。结论:RALP和LP在安全性和有效性方面具有可比性。采用一种技术而不是另一种技术可能是合理的,因为外科医生的偏好和机器人的可用性。
{"title":"Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Technique for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Treatment in Children: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Carlo Maria Ferlini, Giulia Fusi, Michela Marinaro, Marta Gazzaneo, Simonetta Mencherini, Alessandro Raffaele, Piero Romano, Luigi Avolio, Massimo Garriboli, Giovanna Riccipetitoni, Mirko Bertozzi","doi":"10.1177/10926429251396693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251396693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children offers advantages over open surgical correction, including reduced hospitalization times and lower perioperative morbidity, but presents a long learning curve. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) offers the same advantages with reduced technical operative complexity but entails higher costs. No clear superiority of laparoscopy versus robotic surgery has been established. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study including pediatric patients who underwent minimally invasive pyeloplasty at two tertiary-level centers, those at Evelina Children's Hospital in London (UK) receiving LP and those at Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia (Italy) undergoing RALP. Data concerning preoperative variables and obstruction severity; intraoperative variables and surgical techniques; degree of postoperative obstruction reduction, complications, and redo surgeries were analysed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 75 patients were included, with 47 undergoing LP and 28 receiving RALP, with similar preoperative characteristics across groups. The Anderson-Hynes surgical technique was employed in 71/75 cases (94.7%) with universal stent use. No conversions were recorded. Mean operatives times and postoperative length of stay were longer for RALP. Complications took place in 7/28 (25.0%) of RALP patients and 6/47 (12.7%) of LP patients. Redo surgery was needed for 1/28 (3.6%) RALP and 3/47 (6.4%) LP patients. These differences were not statistically significant. Symptoms resolution and postoperative pelvic diameter decrease were comparable between groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> RALP and LP appeared comparable in terms of safety and efficacy. Adoption of one technique over the other may be justified by the surgeon's preference and the availability of a robot.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145543805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aquablation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Study with Comparative Analysis of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation. 经尿道前列腺切除术与钬激光去核术治疗前列腺增生的前瞻性研究。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1177/10926429251393894
Dolev Perez, Ariel Mamber, Michael Pasherstnik, Dmitry Koulikov, Ala Eddin Natsheh, Ofer Z Shenfeld, Ilan Z Kafka, Adam Hen, Andres Malinger, Avital Zeldin, Abd Shabaneh, Saeed Qadan, Israel A Ostrovsky, Boris Chertin

Introduction: Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a leading cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in aging men. When medical therapy fails, surgery is indicated. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Aquablation compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with bladder outlet obstruction. Methods and Materials: A prospective analysis of 318 Aquablation patients (2023-2025) was conducted and compared with 83 TURP and 83 HoLEP patients from a retrospective database. Functional outcomes were assessed using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), ICIQ-UI, EF-IIEF, and MSHQ-EJD SF. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Follow-ups were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Aquablation patients had larger prostates than TURP (94 versus 54.7 cc; P < .0001) but smaller than HoLEP (105 cc; P = .002) patients. More Aquablation patients had indwelling catheters and were on anticoagulants (P < .0001). IPSS improvement was the greatest in Aquablation (18.9 points) versus TURP (13.8) and HoLEP (14.7; P = .000). Erectile function was preserved in Aquablation (P = .859), with significantly better ejaculatory function (82.8% preserved) than TURP (36%) and HoLEP (18%). Furthermore, Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications were higher in Aquablation, but serious events (CD 3-4) were comparable. Complication rates declined significantly after the first 30 Aquablation cases. Conclusion: Aquablation is an effective surgical option for medium to large prostates, offering superior symptom relief and preservation of sexual function. Although its learning curve is shorter than HoLEP's, proper training is essential to minimize early complications.

简介:良性前列腺增生是老年男性下尿路症状的主要原因。当药物治疗失败时,需要手术治疗。本研究比较了经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)治疗膀胱出口梗阻患者的安全性和有效性。方法与材料:对318例水消融患者(2023-2025)进行前瞻性分析,并与回顾性数据库中的83例TURP和83例HoLEP患者进行比较。功能结局采用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、ICIQ-UI、EF-IIEF和MSHQ-EJD SF进行评估。采用Clavien-Dindo分级对并发症进行分级。随访时间分别为3、6、12个月。结果:水消融患者的前列腺比TURP患者大(94比54.7 cc, P < 0.0001),但比HoLEP患者小(105 cc, P = 0.002)。更多的水消融患者使用留置导管和抗凝剂(P < 0.0001)。与TURP(13.8分)和HoLEP(14.7分,P = 0.000)相比,Aquablation组IPSS改善最大(18.9分)。水溶消融术能保留勃起功能(P = 0.859),射精功能(82.8%)明显优于TURP(36%)和HoLEP(18%)。此外,Clavien-Dindo 1-2级并发症在水消融组较高,但严重事件(cd3 -4)相当。术后并发症发生率明显下降。结论:水溶消融术是治疗中大型前列腺的一种有效的手术选择,对症状的缓解和性功能的保留有较好的效果。虽然它的学习曲线比HoLEP短,但适当的训练对于减少早期并发症是必不可少的。
{"title":"Aquablation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Study with Comparative Analysis of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation.","authors":"Dolev Perez, Ariel Mamber, Michael Pasherstnik, Dmitry Koulikov, Ala Eddin Natsheh, Ofer Z Shenfeld, Ilan Z Kafka, Adam Hen, Andres Malinger, Avital Zeldin, Abd Shabaneh, Saeed Qadan, Israel A Ostrovsky, Boris Chertin","doi":"10.1177/10926429251393894","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429251393894","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Benign prostatic hyperplasia is a leading cause of lower urinary tract symptoms in aging men. When medical therapy fails, surgery is indicated. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of Aquablation compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with bladder outlet obstruction. <b><i>Methods and Materials:</i></b> A prospective analysis of 318 Aquablation patients (2023-2025) was conducted and compared with 83 TURP and 83 HoLEP patients from a retrospective database. Functional outcomes were assessed using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), ICIQ-UI, EF-IIEF, and MSHQ-EJD SF. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Follow-ups were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Aquablation patients had larger prostates than TURP (94 versus 54.7 cc; <i>P</i> < .0001) but smaller than HoLEP (105 cc; <i>P</i> = .002) patients. More Aquablation patients had indwelling catheters and were on anticoagulants (<i>P</i> < .0001). IPSS improvement was the greatest in Aquablation (18.9 points) versus TURP (13.8) and HoLEP (14.7; <i>P</i> = .000). Erectile function was preserved in Aquablation (<i>P</i> = .859), with significantly better ejaculatory function (82.8% preserved) than TURP (36%) and HoLEP (18%). Furthermore, Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications were higher in Aquablation, but serious events (CD 3-4) were comparable. Complication rates declined significantly after the first 30 Aquablation cases. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Aquablation is an effective surgical option for medium to large prostates, offering superior symptom relief and preservation of sexual function. Although its learning curve is shorter than HoLEP's, proper training is essential to minimize early complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490758","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1