Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-15DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0146
David Hazzan, Gali Westrich, Lior Segev
Objective: We questioned how redo ileocolic resection (R-ICR) in Crohn's disease (CD) alleviates patients in the long-term compared with primary resection. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an elective ICR without diversion between the years 2010-2022. The cohort was divided into two groups, namely, R-ICR and primary ileocolic resection (P-ICR). Results: The study included 181 patients, of which 30 patients are in the R-ICR group (mean age 42.3 years) and 151 patients in the P-ICR group (mean age 32.6 years). The R-ICR patients underwent an open approach (76.7% versus 25.2% among the P-ICR, p < .001), had significantly longer operations (mean 200.9 minutes versus 157.2 minutes, respectively, P = .002), and had higher estimated blood loss (mean 350 mL versus 267.4 mL, P = .043). The groups were similar in overall postoperative morbidity, severe postoperative complications (10% versus 13.2%, P = .762), and median length of hospital stay (12.1 days versus 7.4 days, P = .214). After a median follow-up of 64.2 months, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of endoscopic recurrence (43.3% versus 60.9% in the P-ICR group, P = .104) or in clinical recurrence (43.3% versus 55.6%, respectively, P = .216), but the R-ICR had a significant higher rate of surgical recurrences (23.3% versus 5.3%, respectively, P = .004). Conclusion: R-ICR for CD is a significantly more challenging operation than the primary resection, and patients undergoing a R-ICR are more susceptible to a future surgical intervention than those having P-ICR.
{"title":"Redo Ileocolic Resection for Crohn's Disease, Does It Palliate the Patients as Good as the Primary Resection?","authors":"David Hazzan, Gali Westrich, Lior Segev","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0146","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> We questioned how redo ileocolic resection (R-ICR) in Crohn's disease (CD) alleviates patients in the long-term compared with primary resection. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent an elective ICR without diversion between the years 2010-2022. The cohort was divided into two groups, namely, R-ICR and primary ileocolic resection (P-ICR). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study included 181 patients, of which 30 patients are in the R-ICR group (mean age 42.3 years) and 151 patients in the P-ICR group (mean age 32.6 years). The R-ICR patients underwent an open approach (76.7% versus 25.2% among the P-ICR, <i>p</i> < .001), had significantly longer operations (mean 200.9 minutes versus 157.2 minutes, respectively, <i>P</i> = .002), and had higher estimated blood loss (mean 350 mL versus 267.4 mL, <i>P</i> = .043). The groups were similar in overall postoperative morbidity, severe postoperative complications (10% versus 13.2%, <i>P</i> = .762), and median length of hospital stay (12.1 days versus 7.4 days, <i>P</i> = .214). After a median follow-up of 64.2 months, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of endoscopic recurrence (43.3% versus 60.9% in the P-ICR group, <i>P</i> = .104) or in clinical recurrence (43.3% versus 55.6%, respectively, <i>P</i> = .216), but the R-ICR had a significant higher rate of surgical recurrences (23.3% versus 5.3%, respectively, <i>P</i> = .004). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> R-ICR for CD is a significantly more challenging operation than the primary resection, and patients undergoing a R-ICR are more susceptible to a future surgical intervention than those having P-ICR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"836-844"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141617567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gustavo R Rodriguez,John Kucera,Jared L Antevil,Philip S Mullenix,Gregory D Trachiotis
The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved tremendously in recent decades as innovations in medical therapies advanced concomitantly with minimally invasive surgical techniques. Despite early skepticism regarding its benefits, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques for the surgical resection of early-stage NSCLC have now become the standard of care. After being the subject of many studies since its inception, VATS has been shown to cause less postoperative pain, have shorter recovery time, and have fewer overall complications when compared to conventional open approaches. Furthermore, some studies have shown it to have comparable oncological outcomes, though more higher evidence studies are needed. Newer technologies and improved surgical instruments, advancements in nodule localization techniques, and improved preoperative staging procedures have allowed for the development of newer, less invasive techniques such as uniportal VATS and parenchymal-sparing sublobar resections, which might further improve postoperative rates of complications in specific cases. These minimally invasive approaches have allowed surgeons to offer surgery to high-risk patients and those who would otherwise not tolerate conventional thoracotomy, though some relative contraindications still exist. This review aims to describe the evolution of VATS lobectomy, current techniques, its indications, contraindications, preoperative testing, benefits, and outcomes in patients with stage I and II NSCLC.
近几十年来,随着医学疗法的创新和微创外科技术的发展,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗方法也发生了巨大的变化。尽管早期人们对视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的优点持怀疑态度,但现在它已成为早期 NSCLC 手术切除的标准。视频辅助胸腔镜手术自问世以来已进行了多项研究,与传统的开胸手术相比,视频辅助胸腔镜手术的术后疼痛更轻、恢复时间更短、总体并发症更少。此外,一些研究还表明它的肿瘤治疗效果与传统方法相当,但还需要更多更高证据的研究。更新的技术和改良的手术器械、结节定位技术的进步以及术前分期程序的改进,使得单孔 VATS 和保留实质的叶下切除术等更新、创伤更小的技术得以发展,这可能会进一步提高特定病例的术后并发症发生率。尽管仍存在一些相对禁忌症,但这些微创方法使外科医生能够为高风险患者和不能耐受传统开胸手术的患者提供手术治疗。本综述旨在描述 VATS 肺叶切除术的演变、目前的技术、适应症、禁忌症、术前检查、益处以及 I 期和 II 期 NSCLC 患者的治疗效果。
{"title":"Contemporary Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.","authors":"Gustavo R Rodriguez,John Kucera,Jared L Antevil,Philip S Mullenix,Gregory D Trachiotis","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0281","url":null,"abstract":"The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved tremendously in recent decades as innovations in medical therapies advanced concomitantly with minimally invasive surgical techniques. Despite early skepticism regarding its benefits, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques for the surgical resection of early-stage NSCLC have now become the standard of care. After being the subject of many studies since its inception, VATS has been shown to cause less postoperative pain, have shorter recovery time, and have fewer overall complications when compared to conventional open approaches. Furthermore, some studies have shown it to have comparable oncological outcomes, though more higher evidence studies are needed. Newer technologies and improved surgical instruments, advancements in nodule localization techniques, and improved preoperative staging procedures have allowed for the development of newer, less invasive techniques such as uniportal VATS and parenchymal-sparing sublobar resections, which might further improve postoperative rates of complications in specific cases. These minimally invasive approaches have allowed surgeons to offer surgery to high-risk patients and those who would otherwise not tolerate conventional thoracotomy, though some relative contraindications still exist. This review aims to describe the evolution of VATS lobectomy, current techniques, its indications, contraindications, preoperative testing, benefits, and outcomes in patients with stage I and II NSCLC.","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":"2 1","pages":"798-807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142259609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0156
Laurel Gieseke, Morgan Vonasek, Christine Lovato, Farah Husain, MacKenzie Landin
Background: Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or heart failure can develop ischemic cholecystitis from a systemic low-flow state. Cholecystectomy in high-risk patients is controversial. Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) is often the chosen intervention; however, data on PCT as definitive treatment are conflicting. Data on cholecystectomy in these patients are limited. This study discusses outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in this patient population. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent LC from 2015 to 2019 while hospitalized for CS or heart failure. Surgical services are provided by fellowship-trained minimally invasive surgeons at a single, academic, tertiary-care center. Patient characteristics are reported as frequencies' percentages for categorical variables. Odds ratio is used to determine the association between comorbidities and complications. Results: Twenty-four patients underwent LC. Around 83% were white and 79% were male. Many were anticoagulated (88%), with Class IV heart failure (63%), and required vasopressors (46%) at the time of surgery. Fourteen of 24 (58%) had at least one circulatory device at the time of surgery: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, left ventricular assist device, Impella, tandem heart, and total artificial heart. Four patients (17%) had PCT preoperatively. Fifteen days were the average interval between diagnosis and surgery. Pneumoperitoneum was tolerated by all, and 0% converted to open. Most common complication was bleeding (52%). Nine patients (37.5%) underwent 21 reoperations, one of which (4%) was related to cholecystectomy. Mortality occurred in 5 patients (20.8%); interval between cholecystectomy and mortality ranged 6-30 days. Conclusion: Although high risk, LC is a treatment option in patients with ischemic cholecystitis at risk for death from sepsis.
{"title":"Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Cardiogenic Shock And Heart Failure.","authors":"Laurel Gieseke, Morgan Vonasek, Christine Lovato, Farah Husain, MacKenzie Landin","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0156","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0156","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) or heart failure can develop ischemic cholecystitis from a systemic low-flow state. Cholecystectomy in high-risk patients is controversial. Percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) is often the chosen intervention; however, data on PCT as definitive treatment are conflicting. Data on cholecystectomy in these patients are limited. This study discusses outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in this patient population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent LC from 2015 to 2019 while hospitalized for CS or heart failure. Surgical services are provided by fellowship-trained minimally invasive surgeons at a single, academic, tertiary-care center. Patient characteristics are reported as frequencies' percentages for categorical variables. Odds ratio is used to determine the association between comorbidities and complications. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-four patients underwent LC. Around 83% were white and 79% were male. Many were anticoagulated (88%), with Class IV heart failure (63%), and required vasopressors (46%) at the time of surgery. Fourteen of 24 (58%) had at least one circulatory device at the time of surgery: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, left ventricular assist device, Impella, tandem heart, and total artificial heart. Four patients (17%) had PCT preoperatively. Fifteen days were the average interval between diagnosis and surgery. Pneumoperitoneum was tolerated by all, and 0% converted to open. Most common complication was bleeding (52%). Nine patients (37.5%) underwent 21 reoperations, one of which (4%) was related to cholecystectomy. Mortality occurred in 5 patients (20.8%); interval between cholecystectomy and mortality ranged 6-30 days. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although high risk, LC is a treatment option in patients with ischemic cholecystitis at risk for death from sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"829-835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142019349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-03-05DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0434
Shaodong Gu, Hong Luo
Background: Modified Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty is currently preferred for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Extravasation of urine and anastomotic stenosis are the most common complications after Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty, which are closely linked with the technique for anastomosis. However, there are currently no clear guidelines for the suture bite depth in suturing the anastomosis during pyeloplasty. Objective: To analyze the optimal suture bite depth in laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Study Design: A total of 90 children aged 4-14 years with UPJO-induced hydronephrosis who were surgically treated in the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang from July 2019 to July 2022 were prospectively recruited. All received laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty using 5-0 Vicryl continuous sutures. According to the suture bite depth, the patients were divided into group A (depth 1 mm, n = 46) and group B (depth 0.5 mm, n = 44). Operation time, postoperative drainage volume, time of ureteral stent removal, incidence of postoperative complications, and time to hydronephrosis resolution were compared between groups. Results: Group A showed significantly less postoperative drainage volume, and shorter time of ureteral stent removal and hydronephrosis resolution (all P < .05). Four cases in group B received replacement of a double-J stent. Except for 1 patient receiving reoperation for anastomotic stenosis caused by massive extravasation of urine, the replaced double-J stent was successfully removed from the remaining 3 patients at 3 months, and the symptoms of anastomotic stenosis disappeared. No significant difference was detected in the operation time between groups (P > .05). Conclusion: An appropriate deeper suture bite depth for anastomosis may reduce postoperative urine extravasation and related complications in children who received laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJO-induced hydronephrosis.
背景:目前,改良安德森-海因斯肾盂成形术是治疗输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻(UPJO)的首选方法。尿液外渗和吻合口狭窄是 Anderson-Hynes 肾盂成形术后最常见的并发症,这与吻合技术密切相关。然而,目前对肾盂成形术中缝合吻合口时的缝线咬合深度还没有明确的指导原则。目的分析腹腔镜 Anderson-Hynes 肾盂成形术的最佳缝合咬合深度。研究设计:前瞻性招募2019年7月至2022年7月在连云港市第一人民医院接受手术治疗的90名4-14岁UPJO诱发肾积水患儿。所有患者均接受了腹腔镜安德森-海因斯肾盂成形术,使用 5-0 Vicryl 连续缝合线。根据缝线咬合深度,将患者分为A组(深度1毫米,n=46)和B组(深度0.5毫米,n=44)。比较两组患者的手术时间、术后引流量、拔除输尿管支架时间、术后并发症发生率以及肾积水消退时间。结果显示A 组术后引流量明显减少,输尿管支架取出时间和肾积水消退时间明显缩短(所有 P P > .05)。结论对于接受腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗 UPJO 引起的肾积水的儿童,吻合时适当加深缝合深度可减少术后尿液外渗和相关并发症。
{"title":"The Optimal Suture Bite Depth in Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A Comparative Study in Children.","authors":"Shaodong Gu, Hong Luo","doi":"10.1089/lap.2023.0434","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2023.0434","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Modified Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty is currently preferred for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). Extravasation of urine and anastomotic stenosis are the most common complications after Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty, which are closely linked with the technique for anastomosis. However, there are currently no clear guidelines for the suture bite depth in suturing the anastomosis during pyeloplasty. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To analyze the optimal suture bite depth in laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> A total of 90 children aged 4-14 years with UPJO-induced hydronephrosis who were surgically treated in the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang from July 2019 to July 2022 were prospectively recruited. All received laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty using 5-0 Vicryl continuous sutures. According to the suture bite depth, the patients were divided into group A (depth 1 mm, <i>n</i> = 46) and group B (depth 0.5 mm, <i>n</i> = 44). Operation time, postoperative drainage volume, time of ureteral stent removal, incidence of postoperative complications, and time to hydronephrosis resolution were compared between groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Group A showed significantly less postoperative drainage volume, and shorter time of ureteral stent removal and hydronephrosis resolution (all <i>P</i> < .05). Four cases in group B received replacement of a double-J stent. Except for 1 patient receiving reoperation for anastomotic stenosis caused by massive extravasation of urine, the replaced double-J stent was successfully removed from the remaining 3 patients at 3 months, and the symptoms of anastomotic stenosis disappeared. No significant difference was detected in the operation time between groups (<i>P</i> > .05). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> An appropriate deeper suture bite depth for anastomosis may reduce postoperative urine extravasation and related complications in children who received laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJO-induced hydronephrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"871-875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-05-10DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0138
Gustavo R Rodriguez, Gregory D Trachiotis, Philip S Mullenix, Jared L Antevil
Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States despite declining incidence and improved outcomes because of advancements in early detection and development of novel therapies. Accurate mediastinal lymph node staging is crucial for determining prognosis and guiding treatment decisions, particularly for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify English language articles published between January 2010 and January 2024 focusing on preoperative lymph node staging in adults with NSCLC. Case series, observational studies, randomized trials, guidelines, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. Results: Various imaging modalities, surgical and nonsurgical procedures for mediastinal lymph node staging were reviewed, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography, cervical mediastinoscopy, video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy, anterior mediastinotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA), transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and computed tomography-guided percutaneous lymph node biopsy. EBUS-FNA emerged as the preferred initial staging procedure because of its high sensitivity and low complication rate. Combining it with other procedures or confirmatory testing may be helpful in determining appropriate treatment. Conclusions: Although cervical mediastinoscopy remains a valuable confirmatory procedure in select cases, its role as a first-line staging modality is diminishing with the widespread adoption of EBUS-FNA and EUS-FNA. The combination of EBUS-FNA and EUS-FNA allows access to nearly all mediastinal lymph node stations with high diagnostic accuracy. Future research may further refine the selection criteria for invasive mediastinal staging procedures, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes in the management of NSCLC.
{"title":"Minimally Invasive with Maximal Yield: A Narrative Review of Current Practices in Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Gustavo R Rodriguez, Gregory D Trachiotis, Philip S Mullenix, Jared L Antevil","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0138","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States despite declining incidence and improved outcomes because of advancements in early detection and development of novel therapies. Accurate mediastinal lymph node staging is crucial for determining prognosis and guiding treatment decisions, particularly for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify English language articles published between January 2010 and January 2024 focusing on preoperative lymph node staging in adults with NSCLC. Case series, observational studies, randomized trials, guidelines, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Various imaging modalities, surgical and nonsurgical procedures for mediastinal lymph node staging were reviewed, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography, cervical mediastinoscopy, video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy, anterior mediastinotomy, video-assisted thoracoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA), transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), and computed tomography-guided percutaneous lymph node biopsy. EBUS-FNA emerged as the preferred initial staging procedure because of its high sensitivity and low complication rate. Combining it with other procedures or confirmatory testing may be helpful in determining appropriate treatment. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Although cervical mediastinoscopy remains a valuable confirmatory procedure in select cases, its role as a first-line staging modality is diminishing with the widespread adoption of EBUS-FNA and EUS-FNA. The combination of EBUS-FNA and EUS-FNA allows access to nearly all mediastinal lymph node stations with high diagnostic accuracy. Future research may further refine the selection criteria for invasive mediastinal staging procedures, ultimately optimizing patient outcomes in the management of NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"773-785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140900116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-09-09DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.67954.jla
Jared L Antevil
{"title":"Commentary: Innovations in the Management of Lung Cancer.","authors":"Jared L Antevil","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.67954.jla","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.67954.jla","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"772"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142156517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-05-21DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0132
Murat Yildirim, Bulent Koca, Muzaffer Fatih Tufekci, Ali Ihsan Saglam, Namik Ozkan
Background: Today, laparoscopy is frequently used in abdominal emergencies such as acute appendicitis. There are several techniques used to close the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. We aimed to compare the use of handmade loop and Hem-o-lok used to close the appendiceal stump in public hospitals where resources are limited, in terms of surgical outcomes and cost. Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2022, patients for whom handmade loops and Hem-o-loks were used to close the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in our clinic were included in the study. There were a total of 638 patients (mean age: 33 ± 13.5 years, 325 females and 313 males) in the patient cohort. Demographic and clinical data, duration of surgery, complications, hospital stay, pathology reports, mortality, and cost of supplies were compared between the two groups. Results: There were 308 patients in the handmade loop group (160 females, 148 males, mean age: 33.7 years, range: 18-85 years) and 330 patients in the Hem-o-lok group (166 females, 164 males, mean age: 32.5 years, range: 18-89 years). There was no significant difference between the two groups for American Society of Anesthesiologists score, duration of symptom, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, preoperative laboratory values, histopathological results, mortality, and morbidity (P > .05). The mean operation time was 48.76 ± 16.16 minutes in the handmade loop group and 40.53 ± 11.63 minutes in the Hem-o-lok group (p = 0.001). In terms of cost, the cost per case of Hem-o-lok group was about 25.8 times as much as the group that used sutures ($31 versus $1.2). Conclusions: Both methods can be used safely in laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of Hem-o-lok has no advantage other than shortening the operation time. However, it is costlier. Especially in peripheral hospitals where resources are limited, closing the appendiceal stump using a handmade loop is an easy, safe, and cost-effective method.
{"title":"Handmade Loop Versus Hem-o-Lok Clip in Closure of Appendiceal Stump During Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Limited Setting in a Peripheral University Hospital.","authors":"Murat Yildirim, Bulent Koca, Muzaffer Fatih Tufekci, Ali Ihsan Saglam, Namik Ozkan","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0132","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Today, laparoscopy is frequently used in abdominal emergencies such as acute appendicitis. There are several techniques used to close the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. We aimed to compare the use of handmade loop and Hem-o-lok used to close the appendiceal stump in public hospitals where resources are limited, in terms of surgical outcomes and cost. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Between January 2020 and December 2022, patients for whom handmade loops and Hem-o-loks were used to close the appendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy in our clinic were included in the study. There were a total of 638 patients (mean age: 33 ± 13.5 years, 325 females and 313 males) in the patient cohort. Demographic and clinical data, duration of surgery, complications, hospital stay, pathology reports, mortality, and cost of supplies were compared between the two groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There were 308 patients in the handmade loop group (160 females, 148 males, mean age: 33.7 years, range: 18-85 years) and 330 patients in the Hem-o-lok group (166 females, 164 males, mean age: 32.5 years, range: 18-89 years). There was no significant difference between the two groups for American Society of Anesthesiologists score, duration of symptom, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, preoperative laboratory values, histopathological results, mortality, and morbidity (<i>P</i> > .05). The mean operation time was 48.76 ± 16.16 minutes in the handmade loop group and 40.53 ± 11.63 minutes in the Hem-o-lok group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). In terms of cost, the cost per case of Hem-o-lok group was about 25.8 times as much as the group that used sutures ($31 versus $1.2). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Both methods can be used safely in laparoscopic appendectomy. The use of Hem-o-lok has no advantage other than shortening the operation time. However, it is costlier. Especially in peripheral hospitals where resources are limited, closing the appendiceal stump using a handmade loop is an easy, safe, and cost-effective method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"822-828"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141072147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-06-20DOI: 10.1089/lap.2024.0164
Robert W C Young, Gustavo R Rodriguez, John Kucera, Daniel Carrera, Jared L Antevil, Gregory D Trachiotis
Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. An increasing understanding of relevant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biomarkers has led to the recent development of molecular-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors that have revolutionized treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic disease. The purpose of this review is to provide surgeons with a state-of-the-art understanding of the current medical and surgical treatment trends and their implications in the future of management of NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify English language articles published between January 2010 and March 2024 focusing on molecular markers, tumor targeting, and immunotherapy in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC. Case series, observational studies, randomized trials, guidelines, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. Results: There is now increasing data to suggest that molecular-targeted therapies and immune therapies have a role in the neoadjuvant setting. Advances in intraoperative imaging allow surgeons to perform increasingly parenchymal-sparing lung resections without compromising tumor margins. Liquid biopsies can noninvasively detect targetable mutations in cancer cells and DNA from a blood draw, potentially allowing for earlier diagnosis, personalized therapy, and long-term monitoring for disease recurrence. Conclusions: The management of NSCLC has advanced dramatically in recent years fueled by a growing understanding of the cancer biology of NSCLC. Advances in medical therapies, surgical techniques, and diagnostic and surveillance modalities continue to evolve but have already impacted current treatment strategies for NSCLC, which are encompassed in this review.
{"title":"Molecular Markers, Immune Therapy, and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-State-of-the-Art Review for Surgeons.","authors":"Robert W C Young, Gustavo R Rodriguez, John Kucera, Daniel Carrera, Jared L Antevil, Gregory D Trachiotis","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0164","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0164","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. An increasing understanding of relevant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) biomarkers has led to the recent development of molecular-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors that have revolutionized treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic disease. The purpose of this review is to provide surgeons with a state-of-the-art understanding of the current medical and surgical treatment trends and their implications in the future of management of NSCLC. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A systematic search of PubMed was conducted to identify English language articles published between January 2010 and March 2024 focusing on molecular markers, tumor targeting, and immunotherapy in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC. Case series, observational studies, randomized trials, guidelines, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> There is now increasing data to suggest that molecular-targeted therapies and immune therapies have a role in the neoadjuvant setting. Advances in intraoperative imaging allow surgeons to perform increasingly parenchymal-sparing lung resections without compromising tumor margins. Liquid biopsies can noninvasively detect targetable mutations in cancer cells and DNA from a blood draw, potentially allowing for earlier diagnosis, personalized therapy, and long-term monitoring for disease recurrence. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The management of NSCLC has advanced dramatically in recent years fueled by a growing understanding of the cancer biology of NSCLC. Advances in medical therapies, surgical techniques, and diagnostic and surveillance modalities continue to evolve but have already impacted current treatment strategies for NSCLC, which are encompassed in this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"786-797"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141433228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) proves a safe and effective treatment for choledochal stones. After LCBDE, preferred choledochal closure is favored for short- and long-term outcomes compared with t-tube drainage. However, there are no relevant studies on the technique of layered closure of the common bile duct with double-needle bidirectional barbed suture at home and abroad. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy from January 2021 to October 2023 in our hospital was performed. A continuous layered one-stage suture using two-needle bidirectional barb wire. The primary outcomes were stone clearance, operative time, blood loss, and complications. Secondary outcomes were complications, length of hospitalization, and time to drain removal. Results: During the study period, laparoscopic surgery was successful in all cases, and the initial stones were removed without complications. Conclusion: The treatment of choledocholithiasis with continuous layered one-stage suture with double-needle bidirectional barbed wire after LCBDE is a new convenient and effective treatment in selected patients.
{"title":"Double-Needle Bidirectional Barbed Wire Continuous Layered Suture Technique for Laparoscopic Stage I Common Bile Duct Surgery.","authors":"Yiqing Wang, Yulin Tan, Jiarui Li, Wenbo Xue, Yibo Wang, Huaji Jiang, Weiwei Chen, Wei Ding","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0149","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) proves a safe and effective treatment for choledochal stones. After LCBDE, preferred choledochal closure is favored for short- and long-term outcomes compared with t-tube drainage. However, there are no relevant studies on the technique of layered closure of the common bile duct with double-needle bidirectional barbed suture at home and abroad. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective study of 37 patients who underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy from January 2021 to October 2023 in our hospital was performed. A continuous layered one-stage suture using two-needle bidirectional barb wire. The primary outcomes were stone clearance, operative time, blood loss, and complications. Secondary outcomes were complications, length of hospitalization, and time to drain removal. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, laparoscopic surgery was successful in all cases, and the initial stones were removed without complications. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The treatment of choledocholithiasis with continuous layered one-stage suture with double-needle bidirectional barbed wire after LCBDE is a new convenient and effective treatment in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"851-854"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Duodenal stump fistula represents an infrequent but serious complication after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic double half purse-string sutures plus "8" pattern of stitching for reinforcement of duodenal stump. Methods: The data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed between August 2022 and June 2023. According to the different reinforcement methods of duodenal stump, included patients were subdivided into three groups as follows: Group A, duodenal stump was treated with double half purse-string sutures plus "8" pattern of stitching; Group B, duodenal stump was reinforced by continuous suture using a barbed suture; and Group C, duodenal stump without any additional processing. The incidences of duodenal stump fistula between three groups were documented and compared. Moreover, the independent risk factors associated with duodenal stump fistula were analyzed using the logistic regression analysis. Results: No postoperative duodenal stump fistula occurred in Group A, which was significantly different from Group B and Group C (P = .007). In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.191; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.088-1.303), body mass index (OR, 0.824; 95% CI, 0.727-0.935), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR, 4.495; 95% CI, 1.264-15.992) were the risk factors for duodenal stump fistula. Conclusion: Double half purse-string sutures plus "8" pattern of suture can be conducted in a relatively short operation period and could prevent the incidence of duodenal stump fistula to some extent.
背景:十二指肠残端瘘是胃癌腹腔镜根治性胃切除术(Billroth II或Roux-en-Y重建术)后一种不常见但严重的并发症。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜双半荷包线缝合加 "8 "字缝合模式用于十二指肠残端加固的有效性。研究方法回顾性分析2022年8月至2023年6月期间接受腹腔镜根治性胃切除术并行比洛斯II或Roux-en-Y重建的患者数据。根据十二指肠残端加固方法的不同,将纳入的患者细分为以下三组:A组,十二指肠残端采用双半荷包线缝合加 "8 "字形缝合;B组,十二指肠残端采用倒钩线连续缝合加固;C组,十二指肠残端不做任何额外处理。记录并比较了三组十二指肠残端瘘的发病率。此外,还利用逻辑回归分析法分析了与十二指肠残端瘘相关的独立风险因素。结果A 组未发生术后十二指肠残端瘘,与 B 组和 C 组相比差异显著(P = .007)。在多变量分析中,年龄(比值比 [OR],1.191;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.088-1.303)、体重指数(OR,0.824;95% CI,0.727-0.935)和美国麻醉医师协会评分(OR,4.495;95% CI,1.264-15.992)是十二指肠残端瘘的风险因素。结论双半荷包线缝合加 "8 "字形缝合可在较短的手术时间内完成,并可在一定程度上预防十二指肠残端瘘的发生。
{"title":"Double Half Purse-String Sutures Plus \"8\" Pattern of Stitching for Prevention of Duodenal Stump Fistula after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy.","authors":"Qiancheng Wang, Zeshen Wang, Shiyang Jin, Yuming Ju, Pengcheng Sun, Yuzhe Wei, Guanyu Zhu, Kuan Wang","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0113","DOIUrl":"10.1089/lap.2024.0113","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Duodenal stump fistula represents an infrequent but serious complication after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. The present study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic double half purse-string sutures plus \"8\" pattern of stitching for reinforcement of duodenal stump. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed between August 2022 and June 2023. According to the different reinforcement methods of duodenal stump, included patients were subdivided into three groups as follows: Group A, duodenal stump was treated with double half purse-string sutures plus \"8\" pattern of stitching; Group B, duodenal stump was reinforced by continuous suture using a barbed suture; and Group C, duodenal stump without any additional processing. The incidences of duodenal stump fistula between three groups were documented and compared. Moreover, the independent risk factors associated with duodenal stump fistula were analyzed using the logistic regression analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No postoperative duodenal stump fistula occurred in Group A, which was significantly different from Group B and Group C (<i>P</i> = .007). In the multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.191; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.088-1.303), body mass index (OR, 0.824; 95% CI, 0.727-0.935), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (OR, 4.495; 95% CI, 1.264-15.992) were the risk factors for duodenal stump fistula. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Double half purse-string sutures plus \"8\" pattern of suture can be conducted in a relatively short operation period and could prevent the incidence of duodenal stump fistula to some extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"814-821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141162956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}