首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
3D Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Romolo Hospital Experience. 三维腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:Romolo医院的经验。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261422298
Jacopo Lauria, Giulio Zappalà, Flavio Calogero Sidoti, Gianluca Scarpelli, Antonio Greco, Vincenzo Andracchio, Francesco Chiaradia, Alberto Piana, Stefano Alba

Objective: To describe a standardized surgical approach for 3D transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (3D T-LRP) performed in a single high-volume surgical center and to assess its impact on early urinary continence, erectile function, oncological outcomes, and overall safety.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 360 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-T2, N0, and M0) who underwent 3D T-LRP at Romolo Hospital (Italy) between January 2018 and December 2022. Procedures were performed by two experienced surgical teams with standardized operative protocols. All patients followed a structured pelvic floor rehabilitation protocol initiated immediately after catheter removal. Perioperative variables, functional outcomes (continence and erectile function), oncological parameters, and complications were prospectively recorde.d in an institutional database and retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The median operative time was 180 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 150-210), with pelvic lymph node dissection performed in 44.2% of cases. Positive surgical margins were observed in 15% of patients. Continence (defined as 0-1 pad/day) was achieved in 75.8% at 1 week, 83.4% at 3 months, and 92.5% at 6-12 months post-catheter removal. The median pad weight decreased from 350 g at T0 to 50 g at T1. In the nerve-sparing subgroup, the median IIEF-5 score at 6-12 months was 18 (IQR: 16-20), with 83% achieving a score ≥16. The postoperative complication rate was 10.3%, with no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb events.

Conclusion: 3D T-LRP performed with a standardized technique by experienced teams and followed by immediate pelvic floor rehabilitation yielded encouraging results in terms of early continence, erectile function, oncological safety, and low morbidity. These outcomes support 3D-LRP as a technically effective and economically sustainable minimally invasive alternative to robotic surgery.

目的:描述一种在单个大容量手术中心进行的3D经腹腔腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(3D T-LRP)的标准化手术方法,并评估其对早期尿失禁、勃起功能、肿瘤预后和总体安全性的影响。方法:我们对2018年1月至2022年12月在意大利Romolo医院接受3D T-LRP的360例临床局限性前列腺癌(cT1-T2、N0和M0)患者进行了回顾性分析。手术由两个经验丰富的外科团队按照标准化的手术方案进行。所有患者在导管拔除后立即开始了结构化的盆底康复方案。前瞻性地记录围手术期变量、功能结局(尿失禁和勃起功能)、肿瘤参数和并发症。D在机构数据库中进行回顾性分析。结果:中位手术时间为180分钟(四分位间距[IQR]: 150 ~ 210), 44.2%的患者行盆腔淋巴结清扫术。15%的患者手术切缘呈阳性。尿失禁(定义为0-1个尿垫/天)在拔管后1周达到75.8%,3个月达到83.4%,6-12个月达到92.5%。中位垫重从T0时的350 g下降到T1时的50 g。在神经保留亚组中,6-12个月时IIEF-5评分中位数为18 (IQR: 16-20), 83%达到≥16分。术后并发症发生率为10.3%,无Clavien-Dindo级≥IIIb事件。结论:由经验丰富的团队采用标准化技术实施3D T-LRP,并立即进行盆底康复治疗,在早期尿失禁、勃起功能、肿瘤安全性和低发病率方面取得了令人鼓舞的结果。这些结果支持3D-LRP作为技术上有效和经济上可持续的微创替代机器人手术。
{"title":"3D Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: The Romolo Hospital Experience.","authors":"Jacopo Lauria, Giulio Zappalà, Flavio Calogero Sidoti, Gianluca Scarpelli, Antonio Greco, Vincenzo Andracchio, Francesco Chiaradia, Alberto Piana, Stefano Alba","doi":"10.1177/10926429261422298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261422298","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe a standardized surgical approach for 3D transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (3D T-LRP) performed in a single high-volume surgical center and to assess its impact on early urinary continence, erectile function, oncological outcomes, and overall safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 360 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-T2, N0, and M0) who underwent 3D T-LRP at Romolo Hospital (Italy) between January 2018 and December 2022. Procedures were performed by two experienced surgical teams with standardized operative protocols. All patients followed a structured pelvic floor rehabilitation protocol initiated immediately after catheter removal. Perioperative variables, functional outcomes (continence and erectile function), oncological parameters, and complications were prospectively recorde.d in an institutional database and retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median operative time was 180 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 150-210), with pelvic lymph node dissection performed in 44.2% of cases. Positive surgical margins were observed in 15% of patients. Continence (defined as 0-1 pad/day) was achieved in 75.8% at 1 week, 83.4% at 3 months, and 92.5% at 6-12 months post-catheter removal. The median pad weight decreased from 350 g at T0 to 50 g at T1. In the nerve-sparing subgroup, the median IIEF-5 score at 6-12 months was 18 (IQR: 16-20), with 83% achieving a score ≥16. The postoperative complication rate was 10.3%, with no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D T-LRP performed with a standardized technique by experienced teams and followed by immediate pelvic floor rehabilitation yielded encouraging results in terms of early continence, erectile function, oncological safety, and low morbidity. These outcomes support 3D-LRP as a technically effective and economically sustainable minimally invasive alternative to robotic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261422298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Use of Sugammadex for Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 使用Sugammadex进行腹股沟疝修补术后神经肌肉阻滞逆转:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261421065
Ana Caroline D Rasador, Júlia Burmann, Camila Barros, Júlia Kasmirski, Natália P Pascotini, Diego L Lima, Maggie E Bosley, Vahagn Nikolian

Introduction: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication following inguinal hernia repair (IHR), and it can be influenced by the type of neuromuscular blockade reversal medication used, especially acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Among the available options for neuromuscular blockade reversal, Sugammadex has gained significant popularity due to its effectiveness, speed, and safety profile. Additionally, some studies suggest that it prevents POUR compared to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the POUR rates with the use of Sugammadex after IHR.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched without date or language restrictions from inception to October 2024. The databases were searched for studies comparing Sugammadex with other medications for neuromuscular blockade reversal after IHR. The primary outcome was POUR.

Results: From 212 records, 3 retrospective cohort studies and 1 clinical trial were included in our pooled analysis, totaling 1390 patients. 573 (41.2%) patients were in the Sugammadex group, compared to 817 (58.8%) patients in the non-Sugammadex group. 135 (9.7%) patients underwent open IHR, compared to 468 (33.6%) patients who underwent minimally invasive repairs. Our meta-analysis revealed that the use of Sugammadex was associated with a significantly lower risk of POUR compared to other medications (RR 0.11; 95% CI 0.05, 0.28; P < .001), with a relative risk reduction of 89%.

Conclusion: Sugammadex is associated with a significantly lower risk of POUR following IHR when compared to other medications for neuromuscular blockade reversal following IHR. Despite its higher cost and decreased availability in some centers, the use of Sugammadex should be strongly considered as the preferred option to prevent POUR and minimize the need for hospital readmissions.

导语:术后尿潴留(POUR)是腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)后常见的并发症,它可能受到所使用的神经肌肉阻断逆转药物类型的影响,尤其是乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂。在神经肌肉阻断逆转的可用选择中,Sugammadex因其有效性、速度和安全性而获得了显著的普及。此外,一些研究表明,与乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂相比,它可以预防POUR。我们的目的是进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估在《国际卫生条例》后使用Sugammadex的POUR率。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane、LILACS和Web of Science数据库,检索时间自成立至2024年10月,无日期和语言限制。数据库检索了比较Sugammadex与其他药物在IHR后神经肌肉阻断逆转方面的研究。主要结局为POUR。结果:从212份记录中,3项回顾性队列研究和1项临床试验纳入我们的汇总分析,共计1390例患者。573例(41.2%)患者在Sugammadex组,而817例(58.8%)患者在非Sugammadex组。135例(9.7%)患者接受了开放式IHR,相比之下,468例(33.6%)患者接受了微创修复。我们的荟萃分析显示,与其他药物相比,使用Sugammadex与显著降低POUR风险相关(RR 0.11; 95% CI 0.05, 0.28; P < .001),相对风险降低89%。结论:与其他用于IHR后神经肌肉阻断逆转的药物相比,Sugammadex与IHR后POUR风险显著降低相关。尽管在一些中心,使用Sugammadex的成本较高且可用性较低,但应强烈考虑将其作为预防POUR和减少再入院需求的首选选择。
{"title":"The Use of Sugammadex for Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ana Caroline D Rasador, Júlia Burmann, Camila Barros, Júlia Kasmirski, Natália P Pascotini, Diego L Lima, Maggie E Bosley, Vahagn Nikolian","doi":"10.1177/10926429261421065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261421065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication following inguinal hernia repair (IHR), and it can be influenced by the type of neuromuscular blockade reversal medication used, especially acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Among the available options for neuromuscular blockade reversal, Sugammadex has gained significant popularity due to its effectiveness, speed, and safety profile. Additionally, some studies suggest that it prevents POUR compared to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the POUR rates with the use of Sugammadex after IHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched without date or language restrictions from inception to October 2024. The databases were searched for studies comparing Sugammadex with other medications for neuromuscular blockade reversal after IHR. The primary outcome was POUR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 212 records, 3 retrospective cohort studies and 1 clinical trial were included in our pooled analysis, totaling 1390 patients. 573 (41.2%) patients were in the Sugammadex group, compared to 817 (58.8%) patients in the non-Sugammadex group. 135 (9.7%) patients underwent open IHR, compared to 468 (33.6%) patients who underwent minimally invasive repairs. Our meta-analysis revealed that the use of Sugammadex was associated with a significantly lower risk of POUR compared to other medications (RR 0.11; 95% CI 0.05, 0.28; <i>P</i> < .001), with a relative risk reduction of 89%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sugammadex is associated with a significantly lower risk of POUR following IHR when compared to other medications for neuromuscular blockade reversal following IHR. Despite its higher cost and decreased availability in some centers, the use of Sugammadex should be strongly considered as the preferred option to prevent POUR and minimize the need for hospital readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261421065"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic-Assisted Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations Without Rectourinary Fistula Ligation: Two Decades of Experience at a Tertiary Center. 腹腔镜辅助肛肠成形术治疗无直肠瘘结扎的肛肠畸形:二十年在三级中心的经验。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261426050
Angelo Zarfati, Guillaume Rossignol, Remi Dubois, Frederic Hameury, Thomas Gelas, Pierre Yves Mure

Aim: To report our experience with laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for anorectal malformations (ARM) performed without ligation of the rectourinary fistula (RUF).

Methods: In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed all consecutive primary LAARP procedures for ARM without RUF ligation performed between 2004 and 2022. Forty patients were included (19 rectobulbar, 16 rectoprostatic, 5 rectobladder). Colostomy was performed at a median age of 1 day and LAARP at 147 days (median weight 6 kg). Median operative time was 180 minutes, and 1 patient required conversion. No early complications were associated with omission of RUF ligation. Foley catheters were kept for a median of 10 days, postoperative stay was 5 days, and colostomy closure occurred at 7 months. The median follow-up was 6.7 years. Cystoscopy and cystography were performed in 17% and 20% of patients, respectively, with no remnants of the original fistula (ROOF). Eight patients (20%) had urological issues: neurogenic bladder (n = 3), bladder dyssynergia (n = 2), urinary retention (n = 2), and non-LAARP-related urethral stenosis (n = 1). Regarding late outcomes, 2 patients (5%) underwent redo anorectoplasty, 11 (27%) required prolonged dilations, 4 (10%) underwent redo anoplasty, and 2 (5%) underwent revision for mucosal prolapse. Among those >4 years, 84% had voluntary bowel movements, 76% soiling, and 52% constipation; 53% of those <4 years required laxatives.

Conclusions: LAARP without ligation of the RUF for ARM appears to be a safe and effective technique, with favorable long-term urological and functional outcomes. No patients experienced urethral injury or ROOF.

目的:报告腹腔镜辅助肛肠成形术(LAARP)治疗肛肠畸形(ARM)而不结扎直肠瘘(RUF)的经验。方法:在这项单中心研究中,我们回顾性分析了2004年至2022年间所有未结扎RUF的连续原发性larp手术。纳入40例患者(19例直肠球,16例直肠前列腺,5例直肠膀胱)。在中位年龄为1天时进行结肠造口术,在147天时进行LAARP(中位体重为6 kg)。中位手术时间为180分钟,1例患者需要转换。没有早期并发症与未结扎RUF有关。Foley留置导管中位时间为10天,术后留置时间为5天,7个月时进行结肠造口闭合。中位随访时间为6.7年。膀胱镜检查和膀胱造影分别在17%和20%的患者中进行,没有原始瘘管残留(ROOF)。8例患者(20%)有泌尿系统问题:神经源性膀胱(n = 3)、膀胱协同功能障碍(n = 2)、尿潴留(n = 2)和非laarp相关性尿道狭窄(n = 1)。关于晚期结果,2例(5%)患者接受了重做肛肠成形术,11例(27%)患者需要延长扩张,4例(10%)患者接受了重做肛肠成形术,2例(5%)患者接受了黏膜脱垂修复。在这些4岁的儿童中,84%的人排便,76%的人大便不清,52%的人便秘;结论:LAARP不结扎RUF治疗ARM似乎是一种安全有效的技术,具有良好的长期泌尿和功能预后。无患者出现尿道损伤或尿道顶。
{"title":"Laparoscopic-Assisted Anorectoplasty for Anorectal Malformations Without Rectourinary Fistula Ligation: Two Decades of Experience at a Tertiary Center.","authors":"Angelo Zarfati, Guillaume Rossignol, Remi Dubois, Frederic Hameury, Thomas Gelas, Pierre Yves Mure","doi":"10.1177/10926429261426050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261426050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To report our experience with laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty (LAARP) for anorectal malformations (ARM) performed without ligation of the rectourinary fistula (RUF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed all consecutive primary LAARP procedures for ARM without RUF ligation performed between 2004 and 2022. Forty patients were included (19 rectobulbar, 16 rectoprostatic, 5 rectobladder). Colostomy was performed at a median age of 1 day and LAARP at 147 days (median weight 6 kg). Median operative time was 180 minutes, and 1 patient required conversion. No early complications were associated with omission of RUF ligation. Foley catheters were kept for a median of 10 days, postoperative stay was 5 days, and colostomy closure occurred at 7 months. The median follow-up was 6.7 years. Cystoscopy and cystography were performed in 17% and 20% of patients, respectively, with no remnants of the original fistula (ROOF). Eight patients (20%) had urological issues: neurogenic bladder (<i>n</i> = 3), bladder dyssynergia (<i>n</i> = 2), urinary retention (<i>n</i> = 2), and non-LAARP-related urethral stenosis (<i>n</i> = 1). Regarding late outcomes, 2 patients (5%) underwent redo anorectoplasty, 11 (27%) required prolonged dilations, 4 (10%) underwent redo anoplasty, and 2 (5%) underwent revision for mucosal prolapse. Among those >4 years, 84% had voluntary bowel movements, 76% soiling, and 52% constipation; 53% of those <4 years required laxatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAARP without ligation of the RUF for ARM appears to be a safe and effective technique, with favorable long-term urological and functional outcomes. No patients experienced urethral injury or ROOF.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261426050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327907","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimal Preoperative Timing of Indocyanine Green Injection for Fluorescence Imaging Efficacy in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration. 吲哚菁绿注射对腹腔镜胆总管探查荧光成像效果的最佳术前时机。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261421090
Wenfei Wang, Zhenyu Qiao, Zhuang Li, Hua Wang, Lin Han, Jingyang Bian, Kezhong Zheng, Minghui Sheng, Dengqun Sun, Yanjun Sun

Background: To determine the optimal preoperative timing of indocyanine green (ICG) administration for effective fluorescence-guided imaging during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 150 patients who underwent ICG-guided LCBDE between June 2024 and June 2025. All patients received an intravenous injection of 2.5 mg ICG and were allocated into five groups according to the interval between ICG administration and surgery: 0-1 hours, 1-3 hours, 3-6 hours, 6-9 hours, and 9-12 hours. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative fluorescence visualization, bile duct-to-liver fluorescence intensity contrast, and perioperative outcomes were compared among groups.

Results: Visualization rates of the cystic duct, common hepatic duct, and common bile duct (CBD) did not differ significantly among groups (P > .05). In contrast, liver fluorescence visualization differed significantly (P = .002) and was lowest in the 9-12 hours group. The bile duct-to-liver fluorescence intensity difference was greatest in the 6-9 hours group. The time to identify the CBD differed significantly among groups (P < .001), with shorter identification times observed in the 1-3 hours, 3-6 hours, and 6-9 hours groups compared with the 0-1 hours group.

Conclusion: Preoperative intravenous administration of 2.5 mg ICG 6-9 hours before LCBDE is associated with optimal biliary fluorescence contrast and improved intraoperative identification of the CBD.

背景:为了在腹腔镜胆总管探查(LCBDE)中获得有效的荧光引导成像,确定吲哚菁绿(ICG)的最佳术前给药时机。方法:回顾性分析2024年6月至2025年6月间接受icg引导下LCBDE治疗的150例患者。所有患者均静脉注射ICG 2.5 mg,根据ICG给药至手术时间间隔分为5组:0-1小时、1-3小时、3-6小时、6-9小时、9-12小时。各组患者基线特征、术中荧光显示、胆管至肝脏荧光强度对比及围手术期结果比较。结果:胆囊管、肝总管、胆总管(CBD)显像率各组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。相比之下,肝脏荧光显示差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002),且在9-12小时组最低。胆管-肝脏荧光强度差异在6-9小时组最大。识别CBD的时间组间差异显著(P < 0.001), 1-3小时、3-6小时和6-9小时组的识别时间较0-1小时组短。结论:LCBDE术前6-9小时静脉注射ICG 2.5 mg可获得最佳胆道荧光造影,提高术中对CBD的识别。
{"title":"Optimal Preoperative Timing of Indocyanine Green Injection for Fluorescence Imaging Efficacy in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration.","authors":"Wenfei Wang, Zhenyu Qiao, Zhuang Li, Hua Wang, Lin Han, Jingyang Bian, Kezhong Zheng, Minghui Sheng, Dengqun Sun, Yanjun Sun","doi":"10.1177/10926429261421090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261421090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine the optimal preoperative timing of indocyanine green (ICG) administration for effective fluorescence-guided imaging during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 150 patients who underwent ICG-guided LCBDE between June 2024 and June 2025. All patients received an intravenous injection of 2.5 mg ICG and were allocated into five groups according to the interval between ICG administration and surgery: 0-1 hours, 1-3 hours, 3-6 hours, 6-9 hours, and 9-12 hours. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative fluorescence visualization, bile duct-to-liver fluorescence intensity contrast, and perioperative outcomes were compared among groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visualization rates of the cystic duct, common hepatic duct, and common bile duct (CBD) did not differ significantly among groups (<i>P</i> > .05). In contrast, liver fluorescence visualization differed significantly (<i>P</i> = .002) and was lowest in the 9-12 hours group. The bile duct-to-liver fluorescence intensity difference was greatest in the 6-9 hours group. The time to identify the CBD differed significantly among groups (<i>P</i> < .001), with shorter identification times observed in the 1-3 hours, 3-6 hours, and 6-9 hours groups compared with the 0-1 hours group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative intravenous administration of 2.5 mg ICG 6-9 hours before LCBDE is associated with optimal biliary fluorescence contrast and improved intraoperative identification of the CBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261421090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimally Invasive Approach after Lumbar Abscess Secondary to Retained Gallstones in Abdominal Cavity after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术后腹腔遗留胆结石继发腰脓肿的微创入路治疗。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-28 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261419372
Micaela Paula Zalazar, Lara Ruiz, Andres Vargas, Ana Fernandez, Mariano Palermo

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely performed and safe, but may present rare complications such as retained gallstones ("dropped gallstones"), which can act as a nidus for infection and cause late intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal abscesses.

Methods: A 40-year-old male with prior laparoscopic cholecystectomy presented with fever and right lumbar pain. Examination showed an inflammatory lumbar mass with leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein. Imaging revealed a right paravertebral collection with a fistulous tract to the abdominal cavity. Despite antibiotics and percutaneous drainage, recurrence occurred. Surgical lumbotomy revealed multiple gallstones, confirming the etiology, with subsequent clinical improvement.

Results: Retained gallstones may migrate, act as foreign bodies, and cause recurrent infection. Magnetic resonance imaging was key to identifying the abdominal origin, and surgical stone removal was required for definitive treatment.

Conclusion: Lumbar abscesses in patients with previous cholecystectomy should raise suspicion of retained gallstones. Definitive management requires drainage and complete stone removal to prevent recurrence.

引言:腹腔镜胆囊切除术广泛且安全,但可能出现罕见的并发症,如保留的胆结石(“脱落的胆结石”),它可以作为感染的病灶,引起晚期腹内或腹膜后脓肿。方法:一名40岁男性,既往行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,表现为发热和右腰痛。检查显示腰部炎性肿块伴白细胞增多和c反应蛋白升高。影像显示右侧椎旁收集伴腹腔瘘道。尽管使用抗生素和经皮引流,仍出现复发。手术腰切开术发现多发性胆结石,证实了病因,随后临床好转。结果:遗留的胆结石可能移位,充当异物,引起反复感染。磁共振成像是确定腹部起源的关键,手术取石是明确治疗的必要条件。结论:既往胆囊切除术患者腰脓肿应引起对保留胆结石的怀疑。最终的治疗需要引流和完全去除结石以防止复发。
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Approach after Lumbar Abscess Secondary to Retained Gallstones in Abdominal Cavity after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.","authors":"Micaela Paula Zalazar, Lara Ruiz, Andres Vargas, Ana Fernandez, Mariano Palermo","doi":"10.1177/10926429261419372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261419372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is widely performed and safe, but may present rare complications such as retained gallstones (\"dropped gallstones\"), which can act as a nidus for infection and cause late intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal abscesses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 40-year-old male with prior laparoscopic cholecystectomy presented with fever and right lumbar pain. Examination showed an inflammatory lumbar mass with leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein. Imaging revealed a right paravertebral collection with a fistulous tract to the abdominal cavity. Despite antibiotics and percutaneous drainage, recurrence occurred. Surgical lumbotomy revealed multiple gallstones, confirming the etiology, with subsequent clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Retained gallstones may migrate, act as foreign bodies, and cause recurrent infection. Magnetic resonance imaging was key to identifying the abdominal origin, and surgical stone removal was required for definitive treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lumbar abscesses in patients with previous cholecystectomy should raise suspicion of retained gallstones. Definitive management requires drainage and complete stone removal to prevent recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261419372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Comprehensive Review of Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, Duodenal Switch, and SADI-S: Very Long-Term Outcomes at 10 Years and Beyond. 袖式胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术、单吻合术、十二指肠切换术和SADI-S: 10年及以上的长期疗效综述
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-28 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261419379
Patrick Noel, Christophe Cazeres, Rami Edward Lutfi, David Nocca

Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. While short- and mid-term results are well documented, very long-term data (≥10 years) remain scarce, particularly for newer procedures. This review aims to synthesize the available evidence on weight loss outcomes, comorbidity resolution, and complications at 10 years and beyond for the five main bariatric procedures.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting outcomes at ≥10 years for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S) were included.

Results: At 10 years, weighted mean %TWL ranged from 24.4% for SG to approximately 40% for BPD-DS. The SLEEVEPASS randomized controlled trial demonstrated superior weight loss with RYGB compared to SG (%EWL 51.9% versus 43.5%, P < .05). OAGB showed excellent durability with a %EWL of 64.1% at 10 years. BPD-DS achieved the highest sustained weight loss (%EBMIL 76.5%-78%) but with significant nutritional concerns. SADI-S data at 10 years showed %EWL of 80% with acceptable complication rates. Type 2 diabetes remission rates varied from 26% to 33% (SG/RYGB) to >90% (BPD-DS). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) emergence was a major concern after SG (31% esophagitis at 10 years versus 7% after RYGB).

Conclusions: All five procedures demonstrate durable weight loss at 10+ years, with a clear hierarchy favoring malabsorptive procedures for weight loss efficacy. Procedure selection should consider patient-specific factors, including baseline BMI, presence of GERD, metabolic comorbidities, and capacity for long-term nutritional follow-up.

背景:代谢和减肥手术是治疗重度肥胖最有效的方法。虽然短期和中期结果有很好的记录,但非常长期的数据(≥10年)仍然很少,特别是对于较新的手术。本综述的目的是综合现有的关于5种主要减肥手术10年及以后的减肥结果、合并症解决和并发症的证据。方法:使用PubMed、MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库进行全面的文献综述。研究报告了套筒胃切除术(SG)、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)、单吻合式胃旁路术(OAGB)、十二指肠开关胆胰分流术(BPD-DS)和套筒单吻合式十二指肠回肠旁路术(SADI-S)≥10年的结果。结果:10年时,加权平均%TWL从SG的24.4%到BPD-DS的约40%不等。SLEEVEPASS随机对照试验显示RYGB与SG相比有更好的减肥效果(%EWL 51.9%对43.5%,P < 0.05)。OAGB具有良好的耐久性,10年EWL为64.1%。BPD-DS获得了最高的持续体重减轻(%EBMIL 76.5%-78%),但存在显著的营养问题。10年SADI-S数据显示EWL为80%,并发症发生率可接受。2型糖尿病的缓解率从26% - 33% (SG/RYGB)到约90% (BPD-DS)不等。胃食管反流病(GERD)的出现是SG术后的主要担忧(10年食管炎31%,RYGB术后7%)。结论:所有五种手术都能在10年以上的时间内实现持久的体重减轻,并且在减肥效果方面,吸收不良手术具有明显的等级优势。手术选择应考虑患者的具体因素,包括基线BMI、有无胃食管反流、代谢合并症和长期营养随访的能力。
{"title":"A Comprehensive Review of Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, Duodenal Switch, and SADI-S: Very Long-Term Outcomes at 10 Years and Beyond.","authors":"Patrick Noel, Christophe Cazeres, Rami Edward Lutfi, David Nocca","doi":"10.1177/10926429261419379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261419379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic and bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. While short- and mid-term results are well documented, very long-term data (≥10 years) remain scarce, particularly for newer procedures. This review aims to synthesize the available evidence on weight loss outcomes, comorbidity resolution, and complications at 10 years and beyond for the five main bariatric procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature review was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting outcomes at ≥10 years for sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), and single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve (SADI-S) were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 10 years, weighted mean %TWL ranged from 24.4% for SG to approximately 40% for BPD-DS. The SLEEVEPASS randomized controlled trial demonstrated superior weight loss with RYGB compared to SG (%EWL 51.9% versus 43.5%, <i>P</i> < .05). OAGB showed excellent durability with a %EWL of 64.1% at 10 years. BPD-DS achieved the highest sustained weight loss (%EBMIL 76.5%-78%) but with significant nutritional concerns. SADI-S data at 10 years showed %EWL of 80% with acceptable complication rates. Type 2 diabetes remission rates varied from 26% to 33% (SG/RYGB) to >90% (BPD-DS). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) emergence was a major concern after SG (31% esophagitis at 10 years versus 7% after RYGB).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All five procedures demonstrate durable weight loss at 10+ years, with a clear hierarchy favoring malabsorptive procedures for weight loss efficacy. Procedure selection should consider patient-specific factors, including baseline BMI, presence of GERD, metabolic comorbidities, and capacity for long-term nutritional follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261419379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147318776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conversion Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Critical Benchmark. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术的转换率是一个关键的基准。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-24 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261421340
Jens Schwarz, Charlotte Reithmann, Martin Rothe, Hans-Dieter Allescher, Holger Vogelsang

Background: Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy is associated with increased morbidity. A low conversion rate, together with a low complication rate, may serve as a surrogate marker of surgical quality. This study aimed to analyze the conversion rate at a secondary referral center in relation to bile duct injuries and to identify risk factors associated with conversion.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all laparoscopically initiated cholecystectomies between January 2013 and December 2022. Demographic and clinical data, surgical indication, timing, difficulty level (Nassar and Randhawa scores), conversion rates, and bile duct injuries (Neuhaus system) were evaluated.

Results: A total of 1534 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. The overall conversion rate was 2.0% (n = 31), with 84% of conversions occurring in emergency cases. Converted patients showed a high prevalence of known risk factors. Most converted cholecystectomies (80.6%) were performed during daytime hours; only 6.5% of conversions occurred after midnight. The incidence of bile duct injuries was 0.26%, well below the average reported in the literature.

Conclusion: A low conversion rate combined with a low rate of bile duct injuries can serve as a surgical quality indicator. Risk stratification using established scoring systems, laparoscopic skills such as intraoperative cholangiography, appropriate timing of surgery, and team composition may contribute to achieving a low conversion rate.

背景:从腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开放式胆囊切除术与发病率增加有关。低转换率和低并发症率可以作为手术质量的替代指标。本研究旨在分析二级转诊中心与胆管损伤相关的转诊率,并确定与转诊相关的危险因素。方法:我们对2013年1月至2022年12月期间所有腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行回顾性分析。评估人口统计学和临床资料、手术指征、时机、难度等级(Nassar和Randhawa评分)、转换率和胆管损伤(Neuhaus系统)。结果:共施行腹腔镜胆囊切除术1534例。总转换率为2.0% (n = 31), 84%的转换率发生在紧急情况下。转化患者显示出已知危险因素的高患病率。大部分胆囊切除术(80.6%)在白天进行;只有6.5%的转换发生在午夜之后。胆管损伤发生率为0.26%,远低于文献报道的平均水平。结论:低转换率结合低胆管损伤率可作为手术质量指标。采用已建立的评分系统、腹腔镜技术(如术中胆管造影)、适当的手术时机和团队组成进行风险分层可能有助于实现低转换率。
{"title":"Conversion Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Critical Benchmark.","authors":"Jens Schwarz, Charlotte Reithmann, Martin Rothe, Hans-Dieter Allescher, Holger Vogelsang","doi":"10.1177/10926429261421340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261421340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy is associated with increased morbidity. A low conversion rate, together with a low complication rate, may serve as a surrogate marker of surgical quality. This study aimed to analyze the conversion rate at a secondary referral center in relation to bile duct injuries and to identify risk factors associated with conversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of all laparoscopically initiated cholecystectomies between January 2013 and December 2022. Demographic and clinical data, surgical indication, timing, difficulty level (Nassar and Randhawa scores), conversion rates, and bile duct injuries (Neuhaus system) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1534 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. The overall conversion rate was 2.0% (<i>n</i> = 31), with 84% of conversions occurring in emergency cases. Converted patients showed a high prevalence of known risk factors. Most converted cholecystectomies (80.6%) were performed during daytime hours; only 6.5% of conversions occurred after midnight. The incidence of bile duct injuries was 0.26%, well below the average reported in the literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A low conversion rate combined with a low rate of bile duct injuries can serve as a surgical quality indicator. Risk stratification using established scoring systems, laparoscopic skills such as intraoperative cholangiography, appropriate timing of surgery, and team composition may contribute to achieving a low conversion rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261421340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147285672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: Are We There Yet? A Trial Sequential Analysis and Fragility Index of Randomized Clinical Trials. 生物补片与合成补片在腹疝修补中的应用:我们已经成功了吗?随机临床试验的序贯分析及脆弱性指数。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261416293
Gustavo Magalhães Albuquerque, Augusto Graziani E Sousa, Maria Clara Morais, Raquel Nogueira, Leandro T Cavazzola, Flavio Malcher, Diego L Lima

Introduction: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures. However, the selection of the most appropriate mesh type remains a subject of considerable debate. Moreover, the current body of evidence regarding the choice of mesh for VHR in contaminated fields remains insufficient. Given these limitations, this study aims to systematically evaluate and analyze existing data on the comparative efficacy and safety of biologic versus synthetic mesh in VHR.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive online search was conducted across databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from January 2000 until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclusively comparing biologic and synthetic mesh in patients undergoing VHR were included, with no restrictions on language. The primary outcomes were surgical site occurrence (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), reoperation, and hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included hematoma and seroma formation, operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed using TSA Software 0.9.5.10 Beta (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Interventional Research), and the Fragility Index (FI) and Reverse Fragility Index (RFI) were calculated using R Statistical Software (v4.1.2; R Core Team 2021).

Results: A total of 762 studies were screened, of which 16 were fully reviewed. Four RCTs including 758 patients were analyzed in the TSA; 48% of patients had Wound Classification II-IV, and 83.4% underwent open procedures. Only OT reached the required information size (RIS), providing conclusive evidence favoring synthetic mesh. For all other outcomes-including SSO, SSI, reoperation, hernia recurrence, seroma, hematoma, and LOS-the RIS was not reached, reflecting underpowered evidence. Fragility and reverse fragility analyses revealed highly unstable results across most studies, with FI values of 0 in nearly all nonsignificant outcomes and RFI ranging from 1 to 11.

Conclusions: Biologic and synthetic mesh demonstrated comparable results in VHR across multiple clinical parameters. However, the TSA indicated that only OT reached the RIS, providing conclusive evidence favoring synthetic mesh by demonstrating a significantly shorter duration of surgery. For all other outcomes, the analysis suggests that current evidence remains inconclusive regarding the superiority of either mesh type.

腹疝修补术(VHR)是最常用的外科手术之一。然而,选择最合适的网格类型仍然是一个相当有争议的主题。此外,目前关于污染场地VHR的网格选择的证据仍然不足。鉴于这些局限性,本研究旨在系统地评估和分析生物补片与合成补片在VHR中的疗效和安全性的比较。材料和方法:从2000年1月到2025年1月,对数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library)进行了全面的在线搜索。随机对照试验(rct)专门比较VHR患者的生物和合成补片,没有语言限制。主要结局为手术部位发生(SSO)、手术部位感染(SSI)、再手术和疝复发。次要结果包括血肿和血肿的形成、手术时间(OT)和住院时间(LOS)。采用TSA软件0.9.5.10 Beta(哥本哈根试验单元,临床介入研究中心)进行试验序列分析(TSA),使用R统计软件(v4.1.2; R Core Team 2021)计算脆弱性指数(FI)和反向脆弱性指数(RFI)。结果:共筛选了762项研究,其中16项得到了全面综述。在TSA中分析了4个rct,包括758例患者;48%的患者伤口分类为II-IV级,83.4%的患者接受了开放性手术。只有OT达到了所需的信息大小(RIS),为支持合成网格提供了确凿的证据。对于所有其他结果,包括SSO、SSI、再手术、疝气复发、血肿、血肿和los,没有达到RIS,反映了证据不足。脆弱性和反向脆弱性分析显示,大多数研究的结果都非常不稳定,几乎所有不显著结果的FI值都为0,RFI值从1到11不等。结论:生物补片和合成补片在多种临床参数的VHR治疗中表现出可比性。然而,TSA表明只有OT达到RIS,通过证明手术时间显着缩短,为支持合成补片提供了确凿的证据。对于所有其他的结果,分析表明,目前的证据仍然不确定的优越性,任何网格类型。
{"title":"Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: Are We There Yet? A Trial Sequential Analysis and Fragility Index of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Gustavo Magalhães Albuquerque, Augusto Graziani E Sousa, Maria Clara Morais, Raquel Nogueira, Leandro T Cavazzola, Flavio Malcher, Diego L Lima","doi":"10.1177/10926429261416293","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261416293","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures. However, the selection of the most appropriate mesh type remains a subject of considerable debate. Moreover, the current body of evidence regarding the choice of mesh for VHR in contaminated fields remains insufficient. Given these limitations, this study aims to systematically evaluate and analyze existing data on the comparative efficacy and safety of biologic versus synthetic mesh in VHR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive online search was conducted across databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from January 2000 until January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exclusively comparing biologic and synthetic mesh in patients undergoing VHR were included, with no restrictions on language. The primary outcomes were surgical site occurrence (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), reoperation, and hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included hematoma and seroma formation, operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed using TSA Software 0.9.5.10 Beta (Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Interventional Research), and the Fragility Index (FI) and Reverse Fragility Index (RFI) were calculated using R Statistical Software (v4.1.2; R Core Team 2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 762 studies were screened, of which 16 were fully reviewed. Four RCTs including 758 patients were analyzed in the TSA; 48% of patients had Wound Classification II-IV, and 83.4% underwent open procedures. Only OT reached the required information size (RIS), providing conclusive evidence favoring synthetic mesh. For all other outcomes-including SSO, SSI, reoperation, hernia recurrence, seroma, hematoma, and LOS-the RIS was not reached, reflecting underpowered evidence. Fragility and reverse fragility analyses revealed highly unstable results across most studies, with FI values of 0 in nearly all nonsignificant outcomes and RFI ranging from 1 to 11.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Biologic and synthetic mesh demonstrated comparable results in VHR across multiple clinical parameters. However, the TSA indicated that only OT reached the RIS, providing conclusive evidence favoring synthetic mesh by demonstrating a significantly shorter duration of surgery. For all other outcomes, the analysis suggests that current evidence remains inconclusive regarding the superiority of either mesh type.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261416293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146229200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Frantz Tumor: Splenopancreatectomy Technical Aspects. Frantz肿瘤:脾胰腺切除术技术方面。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261421088
Martina Lettieri Granell, Adrian A Camacho, Camila Capo Grane, Ignacio Solari, Guillermo Rossini, Hugo Ruiz, Mariano Palermo

Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare pancreatic tumor with low malignant potential, predominantly affecting young women. Early diagnosis and complete surgical excision are associated with excellent outcomes.

Case presentation: A 17-year-old female presented with epigastric pain and postprandial vomiting. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a well-circumscribed solid-cystic mass in the pancreatic body-tail. Endoscopic ultrasound with core needle biopsy confirmed SPN. The patient underwent open distal splenopancreatectomy, including systematic coloepiploic division, extended Kocher maneuver, controlled dissection of the superior mesenteric vein, and mechanical transection of the pancreatic neck with reinforced stapled closure. The procedure was completed en bloc without intraoperative complications. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Final histopathology is pending.

Discussion: SPN typically demonstrates favorable biological behavior, and complete resection is curative in most cases. This case underscores key technical aspects of distal pancreatectomy, such as early vascular control, careful mobilization of the splenic hilum, and reinforcement of the pancreatic stump to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.

Conclusion: Distal splenopancreatectomy remains the standard surgical approach for SPN located in the pancreatic body and tail. Meticulous operative technique and adherence to oncologic principles are essential to ensure optimal outcomes in these patients.

背景:实性假乳头状肿瘤(SPN)是一种罕见的低恶性潜能胰腺肿瘤,主要影响年轻女性。早期诊断和完全手术切除与良好的预后相关。病例介绍:一名17岁女性,以上腹部疼痛和餐后呕吐为主诉。增强CT显示胰腺体尾一边界清楚的实性囊性肿块。内窥镜超声和核心穿刺活检证实SPN。患者行远端脾胰切除术,包括系统大网膜切开、扩展Kocher手法、控制性肠系膜上静脉分离、机械胰颈横断加强钉状缝合。手术整体完成,无术中并发症。术后恢复顺利。最终的组织病理学检查正在等待中。讨论:SPN通常表现出良好的生物学行为,在大多数情况下完全切除是可治愈的。本病例强调了远端胰腺切除术的关键技术方面,如早期血管控制,小心地动员脾门,加强胰腺残端以减少术后胰瘘的风险。结论:远端脾胰切除术仍然是治疗胰体和胰尾SPN的标准手术入路。细致的手术技术和遵守肿瘤学原则是确保这些患者获得最佳结果的必要条件。
{"title":"Frantz Tumor: Splenopancreatectomy Technical Aspects.","authors":"Martina Lettieri Granell, Adrian A Camacho, Camila Capo Grane, Ignacio Solari, Guillermo Rossini, Hugo Ruiz, Mariano Palermo","doi":"10.1177/10926429261421088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261421088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare pancreatic tumor with low malignant potential, predominantly affecting young women. Early diagnosis and complete surgical excision are associated with excellent outcomes.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 17-year-old female presented with epigastric pain and postprandial vomiting. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a well-circumscribed solid-cystic mass in the pancreatic body-tail. Endoscopic ultrasound with core needle biopsy confirmed SPN. The patient underwent open distal splenopancreatectomy, including systematic coloepiploic division, extended Kocher maneuver, controlled dissection of the superior mesenteric vein, and mechanical transection of the pancreatic neck with reinforced stapled closure. The procedure was completed en bloc without intraoperative complications. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Final histopathology is pending.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>SPN typically demonstrates favorable biological behavior, and complete resection is curative in most cases. This case underscores key technical aspects of distal pancreatectomy, such as early vascular control, careful mobilization of the splenic hilum, and reinforcement of the pancreatic stump to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Distal splenopancreatectomy remains the standard surgical approach for SPN located in the pancreatic body and tail. Meticulous operative technique and adherence to oncologic principles are essential to ensure optimal outcomes in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261421088"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146229187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in High-Risk Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. 经皮经肝胆道引流治疗胰十二指肠切除术后高危胰瘘。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1177/10926429261424195
Sergio Calamia, Sergio Li Petri, Duilio Pagano, Fabrizio di Francesco, Pasquale Bonsignore, Alessandro Tropea, Ivan Vella, Caterina Accardo, Luigi Maruzzelli, Salvatore Gruttadauria

Background and objectives: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), particularly in the presence of high-output fistulas, infection, and radiological evidence of anastomotic dehiscence. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with external bile diversion may promote fistula healing by reducing intraluminal pressure, microbial exposure, and bile reflux. This study aimed to evaluate the role of PTBD in high-risk POPF management after PD.

Methods: Between January 2022 and December 2024, 122 PDs were performed at our center. Seventeen patients (13.9%) developed clinically relevant POPF. Nine were treated conservatively with antibiotics ± percutaneous drainage, while eight met criteria for high-risk POPF (very high output >400 mL/day, positive cultures, CT evidence of dehiscence) and underwent PTBD.

Results: In the PTBD group, 7/8 patients (87.5%) achieved fistula resolution with a median of 15 days (IQR: 12-19) from surgery, but only 5 days (IQR 4-6; mean 5.4) after PTBD placement. One patient (12.5%) progressed to Grade C, and 2 (25%) required additional percutaneous drainage. No PTBD-related complications occurred, and follow-up cholangiograms confirmed the absence of bile leaks. Importantly, no biliary fistulas were observed. In the non-PTBD group, 7/9 patients achieved resolution with a median of 19 days (IQR 15-22; mean 18.0); 2 patients (22.2%) progressed to Grade C, and 5 (55.5%) required percutaneous drainage.

Conclusions: PTBD with external bile diversion is a safe and effective tool for managing high-risk pancreatic fistulas following PD. By modifying intraluminal pressure and microbial exposure in the child's limb, PTBD significantly promotes fistula healing and may prevent progression to Grade C. Our findings support the incorporation of PTBD into POPF management protocols for selected patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

背景和目的:术后胰瘘(POPF)是胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后最严重的并发症之一,特别是在存在高输出瘘管、感染和吻合口裂开的影像学证据时。经皮经肝胆道引流术(PTBD)联合外部胆汁分流可通过降低腔内压力、微生物暴露和胆汁反流来促进瘘的愈合。本研究旨在评估PTBD在PD后高危POPF管理中的作用。方法:于2022年1月至2024年12月,在我中心进行了122例pd治疗。17例患者(13.9%)出现临床相关的POPF。9例采用抗生素+经皮引流术保守治疗,8例符合高危POPF标准(非常高输出量>400 mL/天,培养阳性,CT证据开裂)并行PTBD。结果:在PTBD组中,7/8例(87.5%)患者在手术后15天(IQR: 12-19)实现了瘘管溶解,而在PTBD放置后仅5天(IQR: 4-6,平均5.4)实现了瘘管溶解。1例(12.5%)进展到C级,2例(25%)需要额外的经皮引流。无ptbd相关并发症发生,随访胆道造影证实无胆漏。重要的是,没有观察到胆道瘘。在非ptbd组中,7/9患者获得缓解,中位时间为19天(IQR 15-22,平均值18.0);2例(22.2%)进展到C级,5例(55.5%)需要经皮引流。结论:PTBD联合外胆道分流是治疗PD后高危胰瘘安全有效的方法。通过改变儿童肢体的腔内压力和微生物暴露,PTBD显著促进瘘愈合,并可能阻止进展为c级。我们的研究结果支持将PTBD纳入选定患者的POPF管理方案。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。
{"title":"Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in High-Risk Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.","authors":"Sergio Calamia, Sergio Li Petri, Duilio Pagano, Fabrizio di Francesco, Pasquale Bonsignore, Alessandro Tropea, Ivan Vella, Caterina Accardo, Luigi Maruzzelli, Salvatore Gruttadauria","doi":"10.1177/10926429261424195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10926429261424195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), particularly in the presence of high-output fistulas, infection, and radiological evidence of anastomotic dehiscence. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with external bile diversion may promote fistula healing by reducing intraluminal pressure, microbial exposure, and bile reflux. This study aimed to evaluate the role of PTBD in high-risk POPF management after PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2022 and December 2024, 122 PDs were performed at our center. Seventeen patients (13.9%) developed clinically relevant POPF. Nine were treated conservatively with antibiotics ± percutaneous drainage, while eight met criteria for high-risk POPF (very high output >400 mL/day, positive cultures, CT evidence of dehiscence) and underwent PTBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the PTBD group, 7/8 patients (87.5%) achieved fistula resolution with a median of 15 days (IQR: 12-19) from surgery, but only 5 days (IQR 4-6; mean 5.4) after PTBD placement. One patient (12.5%) progressed to Grade C, and 2 (25%) required additional percutaneous drainage. No PTBD-related complications occurred, and follow-up cholangiograms confirmed the absence of bile leaks. Importantly, no biliary fistulas were observed. In the non-PTBD group, 7/9 patients achieved resolution with a median of 19 days (IQR 15-22; mean 18.0); 2 patients (22.2%) progressed to Grade C, and 5 (55.5%) required percutaneous drainage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PTBD with external bile diversion is a safe and effective tool for managing high-risk pancreatic fistulas following PD. By modifying intraluminal pressure and microbial exposure in the child's limb, PTBD significantly promotes fistula healing and may prevent progression to Grade C. Our findings support the incorporation of PTBD into POPF management protocols for selected patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"10926429261424195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146229378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1