Pub Date : 2024-12-27DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106399
Marit Neumann, Maja Reimann, Dumitru Chesov, Cristina Popa, Antonela Dragomir, Oana Popescu, Roxana Munteanu, Alexandra Hölscher, Isobella Honeyborne, Jan Heyckendorf, Christoph Lange, Christoph Hölscher, Barbara Kalsdorf
Objectives: Early detection of treatment failure is essential to improve the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). We evaluated the molecular bacterial load assay (MBLA) in comparison to standard diagnostic tests for monitoring therapy of patients affected by drug-resistant TB.
Methods: The performance of MBLA in tracking treatment response in a prospective cohort of patients with pulmonary MDR/RR- and pre-XDR/XDR-TB was compared with mycobacterial culture, mycobacterial DNA detection using GeneXpert (Xpert) and microscopy detection of sputum acid-fast-bacilli.
Results: Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture conversion was used as the read-out for treatment responses. The MBLA was most concordant during the early phase of treatment, detecting changes in bacterial load with similar accuracy to microscopy and outperforming Xpert. When considering all timepoints, concordance with MGIT results was 72.1% for MBLA, 57.4% for Xpert and 76.7% for microscopy. The AUC for culture conversion was higher for MBLA (0.88, CI 0.84-0.95) than for Xpert (0.78, CI 0.72-0.85) and microscopy (0.77, CI 0.71-0.83).
Conclusions: MBLA was superior in the early identification of successful culture conversion compared to microscopy and Xpert and could be a useful biomarker to evaluate novel entities in Phase IIA early-bactericidal-activity drug trials regardless of the degree of M. tuberculosis drug resistance.
{"title":"The molecular bacterial load assay predicts treatment responses in patients with pre-XDR/XDR-tuberculosis more accurately than GeneXpert Ultra MTB/Rif.","authors":"Marit Neumann, Maja Reimann, Dumitru Chesov, Cristina Popa, Antonela Dragomir, Oana Popescu, Roxana Munteanu, Alexandra Hölscher, Isobella Honeyborne, Jan Heyckendorf, Christoph Lange, Christoph Hölscher, Barbara Kalsdorf","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106399","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106399","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early detection of treatment failure is essential to improve the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). We evaluated the molecular bacterial load assay (MBLA) in comparison to standard diagnostic tests for monitoring therapy of patients affected by drug-resistant TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The performance of MBLA in tracking treatment response in a prospective cohort of patients with pulmonary MDR/RR- and pre-XDR/XDR-TB was compared with mycobacterial culture, mycobacterial DNA detection using GeneXpert (Xpert) and microscopy detection of sputum acid-fast-bacilli.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture conversion was used as the read-out for treatment responses. The MBLA was most concordant during the early phase of treatment, detecting changes in bacterial load with similar accuracy to microscopy and outperforming Xpert. When considering all timepoints, concordance with MGIT results was 72.1% for MBLA, 57.4% for Xpert and 76.7% for microscopy. The AUC for culture conversion was higher for MBLA (0.88, CI 0.84-0.95) than for Xpert (0.78, CI 0.72-0.85) and microscopy (0.77, CI 0.71-0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBLA was superior in the early identification of successful culture conversion compared to microscopy and Xpert and could be a useful biomarker to evaluate novel entities in Phase IIA early-bactericidal-activity drug trials regardless of the degree of M. tuberculosis drug resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106399"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142903824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Ureaplasma parvum (U. parvum) is generally regarded as innocuous, and studies focusing on variations in pathogenicity among U. parvum serovars are inadequate. We elucidated the variations in the pathogenicity of U. parvum serovars in promoting human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Methods: This cross-sectional study used baseline data from a Chinese multicenter prospective cohort of women of childbearing age undergoing routine cervical cancer screening. We employed multivariate logistic regression analysis to estimate the pathogenic effects of specific U. parvum serovars on HPV infection and CIN. Causal mediation analysis was performed to ascertain the direct effects of specific U. parvum serovars on CIN and their indirect implications via HPV infection.
Findings: The final data analysis encompassed 7,058 participants. Upon adjusting for confounding factors, a positive association was observed between U. parvum serovars 1, 3, and 6 and HPV infection (OR 1.53, 95%CI 1.15-2.03; OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.06-1.64; OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.90-2.87); however, only participants with U. parvum serovar 6 showed an increased risk of CIN (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.19-3.02). No substantial correlation was observed between U. parvum serovar 14 and HPV or CIN incidence. HPV infection potentially mediates the influence of U. parvum serovar 6 on CIN, with a mediation proportion of 76.66%.
Interpretations: Our findings suggest that different U. parvum serovars vary in pathogenicity regarding HPV and CIN. Early detection of specific U. parvum serovars, such as U. parvum serovar 6, in HPV-infected individuals may enable early intervention therapies, and reduce the risk of CIN development.
{"title":"U.parvum serovar 6 may be a novel element in the progression of HPV infection to CIN: A cross-sectional study of 7,058 women.","authors":"Yingxuan Zhang, Rongdan Chen, Zuyi Zhou, Wei Qing, Cancan Qi, Jinxia Ou, Hongwei Zhou, Muxuan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106397","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ureaplasma parvum (U. parvum) is generally regarded as innocuous, and studies focusing on variations in pathogenicity among U. parvum serovars are inadequate. We elucidated the variations in the pathogenicity of U. parvum serovars in promoting human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used baseline data from a Chinese multicenter prospective cohort of women of childbearing age undergoing routine cervical cancer screening. We employed multivariate logistic regression analysis to estimate the pathogenic effects of specific U. parvum serovars on HPV infection and CIN. Causal mediation analysis was performed to ascertain the direct effects of specific U. parvum serovars on CIN and their indirect implications via HPV infection.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The final data analysis encompassed 7,058 participants. Upon adjusting for confounding factors, a positive association was observed between U. parvum serovars 1, 3, and 6 and HPV infection (OR 1.53, 95%CI 1.15-2.03; OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.06-1.64; OR 2.34, 95%CI 1.90-2.87); however, only participants with U. parvum serovar 6 showed an increased risk of CIN (OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.19-3.02). No substantial correlation was observed between U. parvum serovar 14 and HPV or CIN incidence. HPV infection potentially mediates the influence of U. parvum serovar 6 on CIN, with a mediation proportion of 76.66%.</p><p><strong>Interpretations: </strong>Our findings suggest that different U. parvum serovars vary in pathogenicity regarding HPV and CIN. Early detection of specific U. parvum serovars, such as U. parvum serovar 6, in HPV-infected individuals may enable early intervention therapies, and reduce the risk of CIN development.</p>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106397"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-24DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106383
Min Chen, Yanling Ma, Huichao Chen, Jie Dai, Lijuan Dong, Manhong Jia, Wenfei Ding
{"title":"Characterization of the first unambiguous HIV-1 CRF07_BC/CRF08_BC circulating recombinant form (CRF160_0708) in Yunnan, China.","authors":"Min Chen, Yanling Ma, Huichao Chen, Jie Dai, Lijuan Dong, Manhong Jia, Wenfei Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106383","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106383","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106383"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The increasing prevalence of Japanese spotted fever in China: A dominant rickettsial threat.","authors":"Zhongqiu Teng, Xue Zhang, Na Zhao, Lupeng Dai, Xianxian Zhang, Ling Han, Tian Qin","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106387","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106387","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106387"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The need for inclusion of the Hib vaccine in mainland national immunization program in China.","authors":"Yonghong Yang, Xuzhuang Shen, Huili Hu, Yajuan Wang, Dingle Yu, Jun Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106386","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106386"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106354
Qingyang Liu , Peiluan Zhong , Qinglin Wei, Xiaorong Wang, Yudong He, Min Yang, Pengcheng Wei
{"title":"Mechanisms of MHC-II binding by novel influenza A viruses and their cross-species transmission potential","authors":"Qingyang Liu , Peiluan Zhong , Qinglin Wei, Xiaorong Wang, Yudong He, Min Yang, Pengcheng Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106354","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106354","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 106354"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142668039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106352
Jorge Calderón-Parra , Sara Grillo , Patricia Muñoz , Marina Machado-Vilchez , Antonia Delgado-Montero , Arístides De Alarcón-González , Manuel Poyato-Borrego , MA Goenaga-Sánchez , M. Carmen Fariñas-Alvarez , José M. Miró , Luis Eduardo López-Cortés , Raquel Rodríguez-García , José A. Oteo , Antonio Martínez-Ramos , on behalf of the Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis (GAMES)
Objectives
We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP) or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy in patients with native-valve infective endocarditis (IE) caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA).
Methods
Post-hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort. We include patients from 2008 to 2022 with definite native-valve, left-side IE due to MSSA treated primarily with ASP/cephazolin. Patients were categorized according to whether they initially received monotherapy or combination therapy for more than 72 h. A propensity score-matched cohort was planned.
Results
Out of 420 included cases, 94 (22.4%) received monotherapy and 326 (77.6%) combination. Median combination duration was 14 days (interquartile range 10–20).
Sixty-eight combination cases were matched with 68 monotherapy controls. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. There were no differences in in-hospital or one-year mortality between groups (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.33–2.18 and HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.35–1.31, respectively). Endocarditis relapses and persistent bacteraemia rates were similar (0% vs 1.5%, p = 1.000; and 19.1% vs 13.2%, p = 0.352, respectively). Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in the combination group (15.0% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Antibiotic combinations for patients with native valve left-sided MSSA endocarditis did not improve patient’s outcomes. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in combination patients.
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of antistaphylococcal penicillin or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: A propensity score analysis of nationwide prospective cohort","authors":"Jorge Calderón-Parra , Sara Grillo , Patricia Muñoz , Marina Machado-Vilchez , Antonia Delgado-Montero , Arístides De Alarcón-González , Manuel Poyato-Borrego , MA Goenaga-Sánchez , M. Carmen Fariñas-Alvarez , José M. Miró , Luis Eduardo López-Cortés , Raquel Rodríguez-García , José A. Oteo , Antonio Martínez-Ramos , on behalf of the Spanish Collaboration on Endocarditis (GAMES)","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106352","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106352","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP) or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy in patients with native-valve infective endocarditis (IE) caused by methicillin-susceptible <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (MSSA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Post-hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort. We include patients from 2008 to 2022 with definite native-valve, left-side IE due to MSSA treated primarily with ASP/cephazolin. Patients were categorized according to whether they initially received monotherapy or combination therapy for more than 72 h. A propensity score-matched cohort was planned.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 420 included cases, 94 (22.4%) received monotherapy and 326 (77.6%) combination. Median combination duration was 14 days (interquartile range 10–20).</div><div>Sixty-eight combination cases were matched with 68 monotherapy controls. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. There were no differences in in-hospital or one-year mortality between groups (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.33–2.18 and HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.35–1.31, respectively). Endocarditis relapses and persistent bacteraemia rates were similar (0% vs 1.5%, p = 1.000; and 19.1% vs 13.2%, p = 0.352, respectively). Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in the combination group (15.0% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Antibiotic combinations for patients with native valve left-sided MSSA endocarditis did not improve patient’s outcomes. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in combination patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 106352"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142677649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106358
Nick King Ngai Chow , Charmaine Yuk Wah Tsang , Yan Hei Chan , Shalina Alisha Telaga , Lok Yan Andes Ng , Chit Ming Chung , Yan Ming Yip , Peter Pak-Hang Cheung
Background
Long COVID affects millions of people and results in a substantial decrease in quality of life. Previous primary studies and reviews attempted to study the effect of vaccination against long COVID, but these studies varied in the cut-off time of long COVID. We adhered to the WHO’s definition of long COVID and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of pre-COVID and post-COVID vaccination on long COVID.
Methods
We obtained data from 13 databases up to 18 February 2024, including peer reviewed and preprint studies. Our inclusion criteria were: (1) long COVID definition as 3 months or beyond, (2) comparing long COVID symptoms between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, (3) subjects received vaccinations either before or after infected with COVID, (4) the number of doses received by participants was specified. We extracted study characteristics and data and computed the summary odds ratio (OR) with the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. We then performed subgroup analyses based on the main vaccine brand and long COVID assessment method. ROBINS-I framework was used for assessment of risk of bias and the GRADE approach was used for evaluating the certainty of evidence.
Findings
We included data from 25 observational studies (n = 14,128,260) with no randomised controlled trials. One-dose pre-COVID vaccination did not have an effect on long COVID (number of studies = 10, summary OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88–1.15, p-value = 0.896). Two-dose pre-COVID vaccination was associated with a 24% reduced odds of long COVID (number of studies = 15, summary OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.89, p-value = 0.001) and 4 symptoms (fatigue, headache, loss of smell, muscle pain) out of 10 symptoms analysed. The OR of three-dose pre-COVID vaccination against overall long COVID was statistically insignificant but was far away from 1 (number of studies = 3, summary OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.05–1.84, p-value = 0.198). One-dose post-COVID vaccination was associated with a 15% reduced odds of long COVID (number of studies = 5, summary OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73–0.98, p-value = 0.024). The OR of two-dose post-COVID vaccination against long COVID was statistically insignificant but was far away from 1 (number of studies = 3, summary OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.38–1.03, p-value = 0.066).
Interpretation
Our study suggests that 2-dose pre-COVID vaccination and 1-dose post-COVID vaccination are associated with a lower risk of long COVID. Since long COVID reduces quality of life substantially, vaccination could be a possible measure to maintain quality of life by partially protecting against long COVID.
{"title":"The effect of pre-COVID and post-COVID vaccination on long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nick King Ngai Chow , Charmaine Yuk Wah Tsang , Yan Hei Chan , Shalina Alisha Telaga , Lok Yan Andes Ng , Chit Ming Chung , Yan Ming Yip , Peter Pak-Hang Cheung","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106358","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106358","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Long COVID affects millions of people and results in a substantial decrease in quality of life. Previous primary studies and reviews attempted to study the effect of vaccination against long COVID, but these studies varied in the cut-off time of long COVID. We adhered to the WHO’s definition of long COVID and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of pre-COVID and post-COVID vaccination on long COVID.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We obtained data from 13 databases up to 18 February 2024, including peer reviewed and preprint studies. Our inclusion criteria were: (1) long COVID definition as 3 months or beyond, (2) comparing long COVID symptoms between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, (3) subjects received vaccinations either before or after infected with COVID, (4) the number of doses received by participants was specified. We extracted study characteristics and data and computed the summary odds ratio (OR) with the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. We then performed subgroup analyses based on the main vaccine brand and long COVID assessment method. ROBINS-I framework was used for assessment of risk of bias and the GRADE approach was used for evaluating the certainty of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We included data from 25 observational studies (n = 14,128,260) with no randomised controlled trials. One-dose pre-COVID vaccination did not have an effect on long COVID (number of studies = 10, summary OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88–1.15, p-value = 0.896). Two-dose pre-COVID vaccination was associated with a 24% reduced odds of long COVID (number of studies = 15, summary OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65–0.89, p-value = 0.001) and 4 symptoms (fatigue, headache, loss of smell, muscle pain) out of 10 symptoms analysed. The OR of three-dose pre-COVID vaccination against overall long COVID was statistically insignificant but was far away from 1 (number of studies = 3, summary OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.05–1.84, p-value = 0.198). One-dose post-COVID vaccination was associated with a 15% reduced odds of long COVID (number of studies = 5, summary OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.73–0.98, p-value = 0.024). The OR of two-dose post-COVID vaccination against long COVID was statistically insignificant but was far away from 1 (number of studies = 3, summary OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.38–1.03, p-value = 0.066).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our study suggests that 2-dose pre-COVID vaccination and 1-dose post-COVID vaccination are associated with a lower risk of long COVID. Since long COVID reduces quality of life substantially, vaccination could be a possible measure to maintain quality of life by partially protecting against long COVID.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 106358"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142695845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Despite vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 evolution leads to breakthrough infections and reinfections worldwide. Knowledge of hybrid immunization is crucial for future broad-spectrum SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Methods: In this study, we investigated neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral virus (wild-type [WT]), pre-Omicron VOCs, Omicron subvariants, and SARS-CoV-1 using plasma collected from four distinct cohorts: individuals who received three doses of BBIBP-CorV/CoronaVac vaccines, those who experienced BA.5 breakthrough infections, those with XBB breakthrough infections, and those with BA.5-XBB consecutive infections following three-dose vaccination.
Findings: Following Omicron breakthrough infections, the levels of nAbs against WT and pre-Omicron VOCs were higher due to immune imprinting established by WT-based vaccination, in comparison to nAbs against Omicron variants. Interestingly, the XBB breakthrough infections elicited a broader neutralization spectrum against SARS-CoV-2 variants compared to the BA.5 breakthrough infections. This observation suggests that the XBB variant demonstrates superior immunogenicity relative to BA.5. Notably, hybrid immunization of BA.5 breakthrough infections after WT vaccination led to additional immune imprinting, resulting in a broadened neutralization profile against both WT and BA.5 variants in BA.5-XBB consecutive infections. However, the duration of nAbs was shorter in these reinfections compared to the breakthrough infections. Additionally, the expanded immune imprinting from previous WT vaccination and BA.5 breakthrough infections account for the enhanced plasma neutralization immunodominance observed in the antigenic cartography for BA.5-XBB consecutive infections.
Interpretation: Overall, we demonstrated a persistent and expanded effect of immune imprinting from prior SARS-CoV-2 exposures. Thus, future vaccines should specifically address the latest variants, and booster shots should be given at a longer interval after the previous infection or vaccination.
{"title":"Expanded immune imprinting and neutralization spectrum by hybrid immunization following breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants after three-dose vaccination.","authors":"Tingting Jia, Fuxiang Wang, Yihao Chen, Guancheng Liao, Qiuyi Xu, Jiamin Chen, Jiani Wu, Nina Li, Liangliang Wang, Lifang Yuan, Dongli Wang, Qian Xie, Chuming Luo, Huanle Luo, Yanqun Wang, Yongkun Chen, Yuelong Shu","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106362","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106362","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 evolution leads to breakthrough infections and reinfections worldwide. Knowledge of hybrid immunization is crucial for future broad-spectrum SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we investigated neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral virus (wild-type [WT]), pre-Omicron VOCs, Omicron subvariants, and SARS-CoV-1 using plasma collected from four distinct cohorts: individuals who received three doses of BBIBP-CorV/CoronaVac vaccines, those who experienced BA.5 breakthrough infections, those with XBB breakthrough infections, and those with BA.5-XBB consecutive infections following three-dose vaccination.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Following Omicron breakthrough infections, the levels of nAbs against WT and pre-Omicron VOCs were higher due to immune imprinting established by WT-based vaccination, in comparison to nAbs against Omicron variants. Interestingly, the XBB breakthrough infections elicited a broader neutralization spectrum against SARS-CoV-2 variants compared to the BA.5 breakthrough infections. This observation suggests that the XBB variant demonstrates superior immunogenicity relative to BA.5. Notably, hybrid immunization of BA.5 breakthrough infections after WT vaccination led to additional immune imprinting, resulting in a broadened neutralization profile against both WT and BA.5 variants in BA.5-XBB consecutive infections. However, the duration of nAbs was shorter in these reinfections compared to the breakthrough infections. Additionally, the expanded immune imprinting from previous WT vaccination and BA.5 breakthrough infections account for the enhanced plasma neutralization immunodominance observed in the antigenic cartography for BA.5-XBB consecutive infections.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Overall, we demonstrated a persistent and expanded effect of immune imprinting from prior SARS-CoV-2 exposures. Thus, future vaccines should specifically address the latest variants, and booster shots should be given at a longer interval after the previous infection or vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":" ","pages":"106362"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142752201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106360
Bilge Eylem Dedeoglu , Alex R. Tanner , Nathan J. Brendish , Helen E. Moyses , Tristan W. Clark
Objectives
Distinguishing bacterial from viral acute respiratory infection (ARI) is challenging, leading to inappropriate antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance. We evaluated the accuracy of two host-response tests to differentiate bacterial and viral infection.
Methods
This study used patient blood samples previously collected during a randomised controlled trial of adults hospitalised with ARI. The aetiology for each patient was clinically adjudicated. PAXgene blood RNA samples were tested using the TriVerity test (which measures 29 mRNAs) and serum samples were tested using the MeMed BV test (which measures 3 proteins). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated against adjudicated aetiology.
Results
169 patients were tested. Median age was 60 (45−74) years and 152 (90%) received antibiotics. 60 (36%) were adjudicated as bacterial, 54 (32%) as viral, 26 (15%) as viral/bacterial co-infection, and 29 (17%) as non-infected. For bacterial (including bacterial/viral co-infection) versus non-bacterial infection, the TriVerity bacterial score had a Positive Percentage Agreement (PPA) of 81% (95%CI 70–89) and a Negative Percentage Agreement (NPA) of 66% (95%CI 55–79) and the MeMed BV score had a PPA of 96% (95%CI 90–99) and NPA of 34% (95%CI 23–47). The AUROC for the two tests was 0.77 (95%CI 0.70–0.84) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.74–0.87) respectively, p = 0.388.
Conclusions
Both tests demonstrated similar overall accuracy for distinguishing bacterial infection with the Triverity test missing some bacterial infections and MeMed BV misclassifying most viral infections as bacterial. Prospective impact studies evaluating antibiotic use, safety and cost effectiveness are now required.
{"title":"Comparison of two rapid host-response tests for distinguishing bacterial and viral infection in adults with acute respiratory infection","authors":"Bilge Eylem Dedeoglu , Alex R. Tanner , Nathan J. Brendish , Helen E. Moyses , Tristan W. Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106360","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106360","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Distinguishing bacterial from viral acute respiratory infection (ARI) is challenging, leading to inappropriate antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance. We evaluated the accuracy of two host-response tests to differentiate bacterial and viral infection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used patient blood samples previously collected during a randomised controlled trial of adults hospitalised with ARI. The aetiology for each patient was clinically adjudicated. PAXgene blood RNA samples were tested using the TriVerity test (which measures 29 mRNAs) and serum samples were tested using the MeMed BV test (which measures 3 proteins). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated against adjudicated aetiology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>169 patients were tested. Median age was 60 (45−74) years and 152 (90%) received antibiotics. 60 (36%) were adjudicated as bacterial, 54 (32%) as viral, 26 (15%) as viral/bacterial co-infection, and 29 (17%) as non-infected. For bacterial (including bacterial/viral co-infection) versus non-bacterial infection, the TriVerity bacterial score had a Positive Percentage Agreement (PPA) of 81% (95%CI 70–89) and a Negative Percentage Agreement (NPA) of 66% (95%CI 55–79) and the MeMed BV score had a PPA of 96% (95%CI 90–99) and NPA of 34% (95%CI 23–47). The AUROC for the two tests was 0.77 (95%CI 0.70–0.84) and 0.81 (95%CI 0.74–0.87) respectively, p = 0.388.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both tests demonstrated similar overall accuracy for distinguishing bacterial infection with the Triverity test missing some bacterial infections and MeMed BV misclassifying most viral infections as bacterial. Prospective impact studies evaluating antibiotic use, safety and cost effectiveness are now required.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 106360"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142711738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}