Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience最新文献

In principle, functional neuroimaging provides uniquely informative data in addressing linguistic questions, because it can indicate distinct processes that are not apparent from behavioral data alone. This could involve adjudicating the source of unacceptability via the different patterns of elicited brain responses to different ungrammatical sentence types. However, it is difficult to interpret brain activations to syntactic violations. Such responses could reflect processes that have nothing intrinsically related to linguistic representations, such as domain-general executive function abilities. To facilitate the potential use of functional neuroimaging methods to identify the source of different syntactic violations, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment to identify the brain activation maps associated with two distinct syntactic violation types: phrase structure (created by inverting the order of two adjacent words within a sentence) and subject islands (created by extracting a wh-phrase out of an embedded subject). The comparison of these violations to control sentences surprisingly showed no indication of a generalized violation response, with almost completely divergent activation patterns. Phrase structure violations seemingly activated regions previously implicated in verbal working memory and structural complexity in sentence processing, whereas the subject islands appeared to activate regions previously implicated in conceptual-semantic processing, broadly defined. We review our findings in the context of previous research on syntactic and semantic violations using ERPs. Although our results suggest potentially distinct underlying mechanisms underlying phrase structure and subject island violations, our results are tentative and suggest important methodological considerations for future research in this area.

Spatially congruent cues increase the speed of bimanual reach decisions compared with abstract symbolic cues, particularly for asymmetric reaches. Asymmetric rhythmic bimanual movements are less stable than symmetric rhythmic movements, but it is not well understood if spatially congruent cues similarly increase the stability of asymmetric rhythmic bimanual movements. To address this question, in Experiment 1, participants performed symmetric and asymmetric bimanual rhythmic finger tapping movements at different movement frequencies in time with flickering spatially congruent and abstract symbolic stimuli. As expected, symmetric movements were more stable. Spatially congruent cues similarly increased the stability of symmetric and asymmetric movements compared with abstract symbolic cues. The benefits of spatial congruence and movement symmetry were restricted to high movement frequencies (>2 Hz). To better understand if the emergence of these effects at high movement frequencies was driven by a change in movement strategy, in Experiment 2, video of the hands was concurrently recorded during task performance. Markerless motion tracking software revealed that participants switched from discontinuous to continuous movement strategies with increasing movement frequency. Because discontinuous and continuous movements are thought to be controlled by distinct neurocognitive systems, this might explain why the beneficial effects of spatial congruence and response symmetry emerged only at high movement frequencies. Overall, results from the current study indicate that the perceptual quality of the stimulus use to cue movement frequency can have powerful effects on the stability of rhythmic bimanual movements, but that these effects may depend on whether discontinuous or continuous movement strategies are selected.

Oral communication regularly takes place amidst background noise, requiring the ability to selectively attend to a target speech stream. Musical training has been shown to be beneficial for this task. Regarding the underlying neural mechanisms, recent studies showed that the speech envelope is tracked by neural activity in auditory cortex, which plays a role in the neural processing of speech, including speech in noise. The neural tracking occurs predominantly in two frequency bands, the delta and the theta bands. However, much regarding the specifics of these neural responses, as well as their modulation through musical training, still remain unclear. Here, we investigated the delta- and theta-band cortical tracking of the speech envelope of attended and ignored speech using magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. We thereby assessed both musicians and nonmusicians to explore potential differences between these groups. The cortical speech tracking was quantified through source-reconstructing the MEG data and subsequently relating the speech envelope in a certain frequency band to the MEG data using linear models. We thereby found the theta-band tracking to be dominated by early responses with comparable magnitudes for attended and ignored speech, whereas the delta band tracking exhibited both earlier and later responses that were modulated by selective attention. Almost no significant differences emerged in the neural responses between musicians and nonmusicians. Our findings show that only the speech tracking in the delta but not in the theta band contributes to selective attention, but that this mechanism is essentially unaffected by musical training.