Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience最新文献

Voices carry a vast amount of information about speakers (e.g., emotional state; spatial location). Neuroimaging studies postulate that spatial ("where") and emotional ("what") cues are processed by partially independent processing streams. Although behavioral evidence reveals interactions between emotion and space, the temporal dynamics of these processes in the brain and its modulation by attention remain unknown. We investigated whether and how spatial and emotional features interact during voice processing as a function of attention focus. Spatialized nonverbal vocalizations differing in valence (neutral, amusement, anger) were presented at different locations around the head, whereas listeners discriminated either the spatial location or emotional quality of the voice. Neural activity was measured with ERPs of the EEG. Affective ratings were collected at the end of the EEG session. Emotional vocalizations elicited decreased N1 but increased P2 and late positive potential amplitudes. Interactions of space and emotion occurred at the salience detection stage: neutral vocalizations presented at right (vs. left) locations elicited increased P2 amplitudes, but no such differences were observed for emotional vocalizations. When task instructions involved emotion categorization, the P2 was increased for vocalizations presented at front (vs. back) locations. Behaviorally, only valence and arousal ratings showed emotion-space interactions. These findings suggest that emotional representations are activated earlier than spatial representations in voice processing. The perceptual prioritization of emotional cues occurred irrespective of task instructions but was not paralleled by an augmented stimulus representation in space. These findings support the differential responding to emotional information by auditory processing pathways.

The human visual system is equipped to rapidly and implicitly learn and exploit the statistical regularities in our environment. Within visual search, contextual cueing demonstrates how implicit knowledge of scenes can improve search performance. This is commonly interpreted as spatial context in the scenes becoming predictive of the target location, which leads to a more efficient guidance of attention during search. However, what drives this enhanced guidance is unknown. First, it is under debate whether the entire scene (global context) or more local context drives this phenomenon. Second, it is unclear how exactly improved attentional guidance is enabled by target enhancement and distractor suppression. In the present magnetoencephalography experiment, we leveraged rapid invisible frequency tagging to answer these two outstanding questions. We found that the improved performance when searching implicitly familiar scenes was accompanied by a stronger neural representation of the target stimulus, at the cost specifically of those distractors directly surrounding the target. Crucially, this biasing of local attentional competition was behaviorally relevant when searching familiar scenes. Taken together, we conclude that implicitly learned spatial predictive context improves how we search our environment by sharpening the attentional field.

Event boundaries help structure the content of episodic memories by segmenting continuous experiences into discrete events. Event boundaries may also serve to preserve meaningful information within an event, thereby actively separating important memories from interfering representations imposed by past and future events. Here, we tested the hypothesis that event boundaries organize emotional memory based on changing dynamics as events unfold. We developed a novel threat-reversal learning task whereby participants encoded trial-unique exemplars from two semantic categories across three phases: preconditioning, fear acquisition, and reversal. Shock contingencies were established for one category during acquisition (CS+) and then switched to the other during reversal (CS-). Importantly, reversal either was separated by a perceptible event boundary (Experiment 1) or occurred immediately after acquisition, with no perceptible context shift (Experiment 2). In a surprise recognition memory test the next day, memory performance tracked the learning contingencies from encoding in Experiment 1, such that participants selectively recognized more threat-associated CS+ exemplars from before (retroactive) and during acquisition, but this pattern reversed toward CS- exemplars encoded during reversal. By contrast, participants with continuous encoding-without a boundary between conditioning and reversal-exhibited undifferentiated memory for exemplars from both categories encoded before acquisition and after reversal. Further analyses highlight nuanced effects of event boundaries on reversing conditioned fear, updating mnemonic generalization, and emotional biasing of temporal source memory. These findings suggest that event boundaries provide anchor points to organize memory for distinctly meaningful information, thereby adaptively structuring memory based on the content of our experiences.

We perceive visual objects as unified although different brain areas process different features. An attentional mechanism has been proposed to be involved with feature binding, as evidenced by observations of binding errors (i.e., illusory conjunctions) when attention is diverted. However, the neural underpinnings of this feature binding are not well understood. We examined the neural mechanisms of feature binding by recording EEG during an attentionally demanding discrimination task. Unlike prestimulus alpha oscillatory activity and early ERPs (i.e., the N1 and P1 components), the N1pc, reflecting stimulus-evoked spatial attention, was reduced for errors relative to correct responses and illusory conjunctions. However, the later SPCN, reflecting visual short-term memory, was reduced for illusory conjunctions and errors compared with correct responses. Furthermore, binding errors were associated with distinct posterior lateralized activity during this 200- to 300-msec window. These results implicate a temporal binding window that integrates visual features after stimulus-evoked attention but before encoding into visual short-term memory.

The perception of rhythmic patterns is crucial for the recognition of words in spoken languages, yet it remains unclear how these patterns are represented in the brain. Here, we tested the hypothesis that rhythmic patterns are encoded by neural activity phase-locked to the temporal modulation of these patterns in the speech signal. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed EEGs evoked with long sequences of alternating syllables acoustically manipulated to be perceived as a series of different rhythmic groupings in English. We found that the magnitude of the EEG at the syllable and grouping rates of each sequence was significantly higher than the noise baseline, indicating that the neural parsing of syllables and rhythmic groupings operates at different timescales. Distributional differences between the scalp topographies associated with each timescale suggests a further mechanistic dissociation between the neural segmentation of syllables and groupings. In addition, we observed that the neural tracking of louder syllables, which in trochaic languages like English are associated with the beginning of rhythmic groupings, was more robust than the neural tracking of softer syllables. The results of further bootstrapping and brain-behavior analyses indicate that the perception of rhythmic patterns is modulated by the magnitude of grouping alternations in the neural signal. These findings suggest that the temporal coding of rhythmic patterns in stress-based languages like English is supported by temporal regularities that are linguistically relevant in the speech signal.