首页 > 最新文献

Ecosystem Services最新文献

英文 中文
Integrating multiple landscape management strategies to optimise conservation under climate and planning scenarios: a case study in the Iberian Peninsula 整合多种景观管理策略以优化气候和规划情景下的保护:伊比利亚半岛的案例研究
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101742
Miguel Cánibe Iglesias , Virgilio Hermoso , João C. Azevedo , João C. Campos , José Salgado-Rojas , Ângelo Sil , Adrián Regos
Global change demands dynamic landscape management that integrates different strategies (e.g. promoting rewilding or traditional farming practices) to address the impact of climate and land use change. Planning for management strategies individually can lead to severe trade-offs between objectives, high opportunity costs and challenging implementation. Integrated management plans are needed to optimise the combination of multiple management strategies. We used the multi-action planning tool ‘Prioriactions’ to prioritise the spatial allocation of four management strategies (Afforestation, Rewilding, Farmland Return and Agroforestry Return) in the Meseta Ibérica transboundary Biosphere Reserve. We aimed to achieve targets for conservation of species suitable area and ecosystem services supply while minimising fire hazard under different climate scenarios. We tested this approach under contrasting planning scenarios depicting different management priorities (Equally Weighted, Forest Maximising and Open Maximising). By integrating multiple management strategies, we could achieve management goals for biodiversity and ecosystem services under different planning scenarios, minimising trade-offs and deriving recommendations easier to uptake. The spatial allocation and extent of management strategies varied according to climate change and planning scenarios. Afforestation was needed when putting more priority on forest species and carbon sequestration, while more Farmland Return was allocated when preserving open habitat species and agriculture. Fire hazard was higher in Rewilding areas and lower in Farmland Return and Agroforestry Return areas. The novelty of our approach lies in its capacity to combine different management strategies and provide an optimised spatial arrangement based on management features, making it suitable for planning in dynamic and complex environments where multiple pressures and objectives must be considered.
全球变化需要动态的景观管理,整合不同的战略(例如,促进重新放野或传统耕作方式),以应对气候和土地利用变化的影响。单独规划管理策略可能导致在目标、高机会成本和具有挑战性的执行之间进行严重的权衡。需要综合管理计划来优化多种管理策略的组合。我们使用多行动规划工具“优先行动”对Meseta ibacria跨界生物圈保护区的四种管理策略(造林、野化、农田归还和农林业归还)的空间分配进行了优先排序。我们的目标是在不同的气候情况下,达到保护物种和生态系统的目标,同时尽量减少火灾的危险。我们在描述不同管理优先级(均等加权、森林最大化和开放最大化)的对比规划方案下测试了这种方法。通过整合多种管理策略,我们可以在不同的规划情景下实现生物多样性和生态系统服务的管理目标,最大限度地减少权衡,并得出更容易接受的建议。管理策略的空间分配和程度因气候变化和规划情景而异。在保护森林物种和碳汇方面,应加强造林;在保护开放生境物种和保护农业方面,应加大退耕力度。还原区火灾危险性较高,退耕还林和农林业还原区火灾危险性较低。我们的方法的新颖之处在于它能够结合不同的管理策略,并根据管理特征提供优化的空间安排,使其适用于必须考虑多种压力和目标的动态和复杂环境的规划。
{"title":"Integrating multiple landscape management strategies to optimise conservation under climate and planning scenarios: a case study in the Iberian Peninsula","authors":"Miguel Cánibe Iglesias ,&nbsp;Virgilio Hermoso ,&nbsp;João C. Azevedo ,&nbsp;João C. Campos ,&nbsp;José Salgado-Rojas ,&nbsp;Ângelo Sil ,&nbsp;Adrián Regos","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101742","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101742","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global change demands dynamic landscape management that integrates different strategies (e.g. promoting rewilding or traditional farming practices) to address the impact of climate and land use change. Planning for management strategies individually can lead to severe trade-offs between objectives, high opportunity costs and challenging implementation. Integrated management plans are needed to optimise the combination of multiple management strategies. We used the multi-action planning tool ‘Prioriactions’ to prioritise the spatial allocation of four management strategies (Afforestation, Rewilding, Farmland Return and Agroforestry Return) in the Meseta Ibérica transboundary Biosphere Reserve. We aimed to achieve targets for conservation of species suitable area and ecosystem services supply while minimising fire hazard under different climate scenarios. We tested this approach under contrasting planning scenarios depicting different management priorities (<em>Equally Weighted, Forest Maximising</em> and <em>Open Maximising</em>). By integrating multiple management strategies, we could achieve management goals for biodiversity and ecosystem services under different planning scenarios, minimising trade-offs and deriving recommendations easier to uptake. The spatial allocation and extent of management strategies varied according to climate change and planning scenarios. Afforestation was needed when putting more priority on forest species and carbon sequestration, while more Farmland Return was allocated when preserving open habitat species and agriculture. Fire hazard was higher in Rewilding areas and lower in Farmland Return and Agroforestry Return areas. The novelty of our approach lies in its capacity to combine different management strategies and provide an optimised spatial arrangement based on management features, making it suitable for planning in dynamic and complex environments where multiple pressures and objectives must be considered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101742"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144099664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the importance of discrete choice experiment framings to derive accounting values for ecosystem and species appreciation services 论离散选择实验框架对推导生态系统和物种增值服务会计价值的重要性
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101745
Gabriela Scheufele , Michael Burton , Ram Pandit
Developing monetary ecosystem accounts requires the estimation of exchange values. While flows of non-use services (e.g., the value derived from the mere existence of a species) are currently not considered as ecosystem services by the United Nations System of Environmental Economic Accounting – Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA – EA) framework, they may be recorded as Ecosystem and Species Appreciation (ESA) services. Estimating exchange values for these services relies on non-market valuation methods. Arguably the most suitable method for this purpose is a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). Transforming marginal values obtained from a DCE into exchange values can be complex and presents a range of potential pitfalls. In this paper, we present an approach that allows translating marginal Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) estimates into exchange values for ESA services for representative sets of framings of the DCE valuation question. We show the applicability of this approach using case studies of Australian species and ecosystems, representing both constant and non-constant WTP estimates for choice attributes. It is a relatively flexible approach for estimating exchange values for ESA services.
发展货币生态系统核算需要对交换价值进行估计。虽然联合国环境经济核算系统-生态系统核算(SEEA - EA)框架目前不认为非使用服务的流量(例如,仅仅从一个物种的存在中获得的价值)是生态系统服务,但它们可以记录为生态系统和物种增值服务。估计这些服务的交换价值依赖于非市场估价方法。可以说,最适合这个目的的方法是离散选择实验(DCE)。将从DCE获得的边际价值转换为交换价值可能很复杂,并且存在一系列潜在的缺陷。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,允许将边际支付意愿(WTP)估计转换为ESA服务的交换价值,用于DCE估值问题的代表性框架集。我们通过澳大利亚物种和生态系统的案例研究,展示了这种方法的适用性,代表了选择属性的恒定和非恒定WTP估计。这是估算欧空局服务交换价值的一种相对灵活的方法。
{"title":"On the importance of discrete choice experiment framings to derive accounting values for ecosystem and species appreciation services","authors":"Gabriela Scheufele ,&nbsp;Michael Burton ,&nbsp;Ram Pandit","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101745","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101745","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Developing monetary ecosystem accounts requires the estimation of exchange values. While flows of non-use services (e.g., the value derived from the mere existence of a species) are currently not considered as ecosystem services by the United Nations System of Environmental Economic Accounting – Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA – EA) framework, they may be recorded as Ecosystem and Species Appreciation (ESA) services. Estimating exchange values for these services relies on non-market valuation methods. Arguably the most suitable method for this purpose is a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). Transforming marginal values obtained from a DCE into exchange values can be complex and presents a range of potential pitfalls. In this paper, we present an approach that allows translating marginal Willingness-To-Pay (WTP) estimates into exchange values for ESA services for representative sets of framings of the DCE valuation question. We show the applicability of this approach using case studies of Australian species and ecosystems, representing both constant and non-constant WTP estimates for choice attributes. It is a relatively flexible approach for estimating exchange values for ESA services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101745"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144243139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating trade-offs in carbon storage, biodiversity, and wildfire risk in European landscape management 欧洲景观管理中碳储量、生物多样性和野火风险的权衡
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101751
A.N. Neidermeier, T.A.P. West, P.H. Verburg
Land use and climate change are driving new dynamics for wildfires and ecosystems globally. In Europe, these drivers contribute to changes in fuel structures which affect the behavior, impact, and recurrence interval of wildfires. In response, there is interest in restoring historic fuel-relevant land management strategies and fire regimes which impact the condition and arrangement of fuels. Simultaneously, ecosystem function (e.g., carbon storage and biodiversity) is a cornerstone for European sustainability and climate adaptation policies such as the Green Deal. Thus, a nuanced approach to landscape management is needed which addresses wildfires concerns while also conserving ecosystem function. Research evaluating the interaction between wildfire and ecological function in Europe has largely been limited to local or regional assessments which can be difficult to translate to European-wide policy initiatives. Our study takes a continental perspective to map areas in which ecosystem function and wildfire may be interacting using data on recent fire activity, aboveground carbon, and biodiversity. We synthesize policy-level considerations for mindfully navigating fire and conservation goals and propose areas which may be suitable for herbivory, mechanical removal, and prescribed burn to manage fuels. Our results highlight several countries, especially in eastern Europe and the Mediterranean, with both high ecosystem function and high fire activity which must be carefully managed to avoid intense and destructive fires in areas of high ecosystem function. Conversely, we identify areas with high fire activity and low carbon storage or biodiversity which may be good candidates for more intensive fuel management with fewer negative ecological consequences. As Europe continues to look to its landscapes to provide a wide range of services, policymakers will need to carefully consider services provided by landscapes to safeguard environmental objectives while managing the deleterious consequences of wildfires.
土地利用和气候变化正在推动全球野火和生态系统的新动态。在欧洲,这些驱动因素导致燃料结构的变化,从而影响野火的行为、影响和复发间隔。因此,有兴趣恢复影响燃料状况和安排的与燃料有关的历史土地管理战略和消防制度。同时,生态系统功能(如碳储存和生物多样性)是欧洲可持续发展和气候适应政策(如绿色协议)的基石。因此,需要一种细致入微的景观管理方法,既能解决野火问题,又能保护生态系统功能。评估欧洲野火与生态功能之间相互作用的研究在很大程度上仅限于地方或区域评估,这些评估很难转化为全欧洲的政策举措。我们的研究采用大陆视角,利用最近的火灾活动、地上碳和生物多样性数据,绘制生态系统功能和野火可能相互作用的区域。我们综合了政策层面的考虑,以谨慎地导航火灾和保护目标,并提出了可能适合食草,机械清除和规定燃烧的区域来管理燃料。我们的研究结果强调了几个国家,特别是在东欧和地中海,具有高生态系统功能和高火灾活动,必须仔细管理,以避免在高生态系统功能地区发生强烈和破坏性的火灾。相反,我们确定了具有高火灾活动和低碳储存或生物多样性的地区,这些地区可能是更密集的燃料管理的良好候选者,并且负面生态后果较少。随着欧洲继续指望其景观提供广泛的服务,政策制定者将需要仔细考虑景观提供的服务,以保护环境目标,同时管理野火的有害后果。
{"title":"Navigating trade-offs in carbon storage, biodiversity, and wildfire risk in European landscape management","authors":"A.N. Neidermeier,&nbsp;T.A.P. West,&nbsp;P.H. Verburg","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101751","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101751","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Land use and climate change are driving new dynamics for wildfires and ecosystems globally. In Europe, these drivers contribute to changes in fuel structures which affect the behavior, impact, and recurrence interval of wildfires. In response, there is interest in restoring historic fuel-relevant land management strategies and fire regimes which impact the condition and arrangement of fuels. Simultaneously, ecosystem function (e.g., carbon storage and biodiversity) is a cornerstone for European sustainability and climate adaptation policies such as the Green Deal. Thus, a nuanced approach to landscape management is needed which addresses wildfires concerns while also conserving ecosystem function. Research evaluating the interaction between wildfire and ecological function in Europe has largely been limited to local or regional assessments which can be difficult to translate to European-wide policy initiatives. Our study takes a continental perspective to map areas in which ecosystem function and wildfire may be interacting using data on recent fire activity, aboveground carbon, and biodiversity. We synthesize policy-level considerations for mindfully navigating fire and conservation goals and propose areas which may be suitable for herbivory, mechanical removal, and prescribed burn to manage fuels. Our results highlight several countries, especially in eastern Europe and the Mediterranean, with both high ecosystem function and high fire activity which must be carefully managed to avoid intense and destructive fires in areas of high ecosystem function. Conversely, we identify areas with high fire activity and low carbon storage or biodiversity which may be good candidates for more intensive fuel management with fewer negative ecological consequences. As Europe continues to look to its landscapes to provide a wide range of services, policymakers will need to carefully consider services provided by landscapes to safeguard environmental objectives while managing the deleterious consequences of wildfires.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101751"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144472457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ecosystem services governance: A cross-realm lever for sustainability transformation 生态系统服务治理:可持续性转型的跨领域杠杆
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101748
Sherman Farhad , Julia Baird , Gordon Hickey , Jennifer M. Holzer , Klara Johanna Winkler , Esteban Ruiz-Ballesteros
The leverage points perspective is used increasingly in sustainability transformation research. Scholars have proposed three realms of leverage for the sustainability research agenda: human-environment interactions; institutional dynamics, and sustainability-related knowledge creation and use. However, studies aiming to better understand the role of cross-realm levers, which create parallel change in human-nature interactions, institutions, and knowledge production and use, remain scarce. To address this research gap, we provide an Ecosystem Services Governance (hereafter, ESGov1) lens to conceptually and empirically investigate the potential cross-realm lever role of ESGov for sustainability transformations. Through theoretical and empirical analyses we: 1) identify the key features within the three sustainability transformation realms and analyze how ESGov can shape and influence them; 2) test the potential for ESGov to be a cross-realm lever for sustainability transformation using a case study from Agua Blanca (Ecuador); 3) navigate intra-realm dynamics, identifying features from diverse realms that may simultaneously be fostered by ESGov; and, 4) ultimately, contribute to the transformation, ecosystem services, and governance literatures by highlighting the enabling mechanisms within ESGov that can facilitate cross-realm sustainability transformation interventions. This study reveals that ESGov, when configured to embrace relational thinking, collaborative governance, and inclusive knowledge integration, can effectively serve as a cross-realm lever. Ultimately, we advocate for a shift from Ecosystem Services to ESGov framework as a means to catalyze cross-realm interventions, advancing sustainability through a nuanced understanding and designing of the dynamic interplay between society and the environment.
杠杆点视角在可持续转型研究中得到越来越多的应用。学者们提出了可持续性研究议程的三个杠杆领域:人与环境的相互作用;制度动态和与可持续性相关的知识创造和利用。然而,旨在更好地理解跨领域杠杆作用的研究仍然很少,这些杠杆在人与自然的相互作用、制度和知识的生产和使用中产生了平行的变化。为了解决这一研究差距,我们提供了一个生态系统服务治理(以下简称ESGov1)的视角,从概念上和实证上调查ESGov在可持续发展转型中的潜在跨领域杠杆作用。通过理论和实证分析,我们:1)确定三个可持续转型领域的关键特征,并分析ESGov如何塑造和影响它们;2)通过对厄瓜多尔阿瓜布兰卡的案例研究,测试ESGov作为可持续发展转型跨领域杠杆的潜力;3)驾驭领域内部动态,识别ESGov可能同时培育的不同领域的特征;4)最终,通过强调ESGov内部能够促进跨领域可持续性转型干预的支持机制,为转型、生态系统服务和治理文献做出贡献。本研究表明,当ESGov被配置为包含关系思维、协作治理和包容性知识整合时,可以有效地作为跨领域杠杆。最后,我们主张将生态系统服务框架转变为ESGov框架,以此作为催化跨领域干预的手段,通过对社会与环境之间动态相互作用的细致理解和设计来促进可持续性。
{"title":"Ecosystem services governance: A cross-realm lever for sustainability transformation","authors":"Sherman Farhad ,&nbsp;Julia Baird ,&nbsp;Gordon Hickey ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Holzer ,&nbsp;Klara Johanna Winkler ,&nbsp;Esteban Ruiz-Ballesteros","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101748","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101748","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The leverage points perspective is used increasingly in sustainability transformation research. Scholars have proposed three realms of leverage for the sustainability research agenda: human-environment interactions; institutional dynamics, and sustainability-related knowledge creation and use. However, studies aiming to better understand the role of cross-realm levers, which create parallel change in human-nature interactions, institutions, and knowledge production and use, remain scarce. To address this research gap, we provide an <em>Ecosystem Services Governance (hereafter, ESGov</em><span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span><em>)</em> lens <em>to</em> conceptually and empirically investigate the potential cross-realm lever role of ESGov for sustainability transformations. Through theoretical and empirical analyses we: 1) identify the key features within the three sustainability transformation realms and analyze how ESGov can shape and influence them; 2) test the potential for ESGov to be a cross-realm lever for sustainability transformation using a case study from Agua Blanca (Ecuador); 3) navigate intra-realm dynamics, identifying features from diverse realms that may simultaneously be fostered by ESGov; and, 4) ultimately, contribute to the transformation, ecosystem services, and governance literatures by highlighting the enabling mechanisms within ESGov that can facilitate cross-realm sustainability transformation interventions. This study reveals that ESGov, when configured to embrace relational thinking, collaborative governance, and inclusive knowledge integration, can effectively serve as a cross-realm lever. Ultimately, we advocate for a shift from Ecosystem Services to ESGov framework as a means to catalyze cross-realm interventions, advancing sustainability through a nuanced understanding and designing of the dynamic interplay between society and the environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101748"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144472459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How much is enough? Applying the law of large numbers to the measurement of interactions between ecosystem services 多少才够?应用大数定律来测量生态系统服务之间的相互作用
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101736
David W. Shanafelt
Ecosystem services (ES) are at the forefront of the scientific literature, finding themselves in the research profiles of the National Science Foundation and European Research Council, as well as many other national research agencies. Yet despite many publications on the topic, issues of data availability, quality and quantity, and uncertainty still remain limitations to the field. In a recent analysis, Shanafelt et al. (2023) found a general trend in the interactions between ES when sampling a landscape: sampling ten percent of the landscape was sufficient to recover the mean correlation between ES measured at the landscape scale. In this paper, we delve deeper into this finding. Specifically, we apply Chebyshev’s inequality and the law of large numbers to show that as the sample size increases, the sample correlation between any two ES approaches the “true” value measured from the underlying statistical distributions of those services across the landscape. Furthermore, there exists a sample size in which the difference between the sample correlation and the true value is tolerably null – the “ten’s rule” from Shanafelt et al. (2023). We hypothesize that this sample size depends on the underlying correlation strength between those ES and the similarity between their spatial distributions, and test this hypothesis using regression analysis in theoretically-generated landscapes. Finally, we test our ability to predict this sample size in the actual Shanafelt et al. (2023) data. Our findings have applications for sample and experimental design, as well as for devising and implementing policy.
生态系统服务(ES)处于科学文献的前沿,在美国国家科学基金会和欧洲研究委员会以及许多其他国家研究机构的研究概况中都能找到自己的位置。然而,尽管有许多关于该主题的出版物,但数据的可用性,质量和数量以及不确定性问题仍然是该领域的限制。在最近的一项分析中,Shanafelt等人(2023)在对景观进行采样时发现了生态系统之间相互作用的总体趋势:采样10%的景观足以恢复景观尺度上测量的生态系统之间的平均相关性。在本文中,我们将深入研究这一发现。具体来说,我们应用Chebyshev不等式和大数定律来表明,随着样本量的增加,任何两个ES之间的样本相关性接近从这些服务在整个景观中的潜在统计分布中测量的“真实”值。此外,存在一个样本大小,其中样本相关性与真实值之间的差异可以容忍为零-来自Shanafelt et al.(2023)的“十分规则”。我们假设这一样本量取决于这些ES之间的潜在相关强度及其空间分布之间的相似性,并在理论生成的景观中使用回归分析来验证这一假设。最后,我们在实际的Shanafelt等人(2023)数据中测试了我们预测样本大小的能力。我们的研究结果可以应用于样本和实验设计,以及制定和实施政策。
{"title":"How much is enough? Applying the law of large numbers to the measurement of interactions between ecosystem services","authors":"David W. Shanafelt","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101736","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101736","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecosystem services (ES) are at the forefront of the scientific literature, finding themselves in the research profiles of the National Science Foundation and European Research Council, as well as many other national research agencies. Yet despite many publications on the topic, issues of data availability, quality and quantity, and uncertainty still remain limitations to the field. In a recent analysis, Shanafelt et al. (2023) found a general trend in the interactions between ES when sampling a landscape: sampling ten percent of the landscape was sufficient to recover the mean correlation between ES measured at the landscape scale. In this paper, we delve deeper into this finding. Specifically, we apply Chebyshev’s inequality and the law of large numbers to show that as the sample size increases, the sample correlation between any two ES approaches the “true” value measured from the underlying statistical distributions of those services across the landscape. Furthermore, there exists a sample size in which the difference between the sample correlation and the true value is tolerably null – the “ten’s rule” from Shanafelt et al. (2023). We hypothesize that this sample size depends on the underlying correlation strength between those ES and the similarity between their spatial distributions, and test this hypothesis using regression analysis in theoretically-generated landscapes. Finally, we test our ability to predict this sample size in the actual Shanafelt et al. (2023) data. Our findings have applications for sample and experimental design, as well as for devising and implementing policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101736"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144084619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic literature review on the implementation of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting-Ecosystem accounting in forests, cities and marine areas 对森林、城市和海洋地区实施环境-经济-生态系统会计体系的文献综述
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101752
M. Inácio , E. Baltranaitė , L.Valença Pinto , M. Meisutovic-Akhtarieva , D. Barceló , P. Pereira
The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA-EA) was set as an international standard framework for integrating and relating economic and environmental statistical data. Since its adoption in 2021, several scientific efforts have been established to operationalise it. Systematic literature reviews are essential for providing a comprehensive worldview on specific topics, exploring gaps, and defining future directions. In this study, we systematically review ecosystem accounting studies in the context of SEEA-EA and collate information on several aspects of its multiple accounts: ecosystem extent, condition, ecosystem services and assets. To narrow the scope, we focus our research on three ecosystem types: urban, forest and coastal and marine ecosystems. The results showed an increasing interest in the topic among scientists. Most of the works were published between 2014 and 2024 (75 studies – 98.68%) and conducted in Europe and Oceania (61 studies – 80.26%). Ecosystem extent and services (monetary) were the most studied aspects; however, most studies do not compile information on opening/closing tables. The revised studies covered other ecosystem types besides the target ones (e.g., croplands). Extent accounts were compiled mainly using European and National land cover datasets. Condition accounts were mostly compiled based on compositional state characteristics, especially using biophysical indicators. Most studies failed to define reference conditions. Regarding ecosystem services (ES), most studies focused on physical and monetary accounts, using mixed methodological approaches. Most works assessed one section, primarily regulating & maintenance ES. Statistical data and market prices for biophysical and economic methodologies were preferred methods. Validation and mapping were not considered in the majority of the works. Future priorities, which are also challenges, on applying the SEEA-EA include developing guidance for (1) systematically defining appropriate reference conditions, (2) validating ES modelling outputs or at least reporting uncertainty levels, and (3) making the connection, often missing, between condition and ES accounts.
环境经济核算制度是作为综合和联系经济和环境统计数据的国际标准框架而设立的。自2021年通过以来,已经开展了几项科学工作来实施该计划。系统的文献综述对于提供关于特定主题的全面世界观、探索差距和确定未来方向至关重要。在本研究中,我们系统地回顾了SEEA-EA背景下的生态系统会计研究,并整理了其多个账户的几个方面的信息:生态系统范围、条件、生态系统服务和资产。为了缩小研究范围,我们将研究重点放在城市生态系统、森林生态系统以及沿海和海洋生态系统这三种生态系统类型上。研究结果表明,科学家对这一话题的兴趣日益浓厚。大部分作品发表于2014年至2024年之间(75篇研究,占98.68%),在欧洲和大洋洲进行(61篇研究,占80.26%)。生态系统范围和服务(货币)是研究最多的方面;然而,大多数研究没有汇编关于开/关表的信息。修订后的研究涵盖了除目标生态系统(如农田)之外的其他生态系统类型。范围计算主要使用欧洲和国家土地覆盖数据集编制。条件帐户大多是根据成分状态特征编制的,特别是使用生物物理指标。大多数研究未能确定参考条件。关于生态系统服务(ES),大多数研究集中在物理和货币账户,使用混合的方法方法。大多数作品评估一个部分,主要是调节&;维护ES。统计数据和市场价格是生物物理和经济方法的首选方法。在大多数工作中没有考虑验证和映射。在应用SEEA-EA时,未来的优先事项(也是挑战)包括制定以下指导:(1)系统地定义适当的参考条件,(2)验证ES建模输出或至少报告不确定性水平,以及(3)在条件和ES账户之间建立经常缺失的联系。
{"title":"A systematic literature review on the implementation of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting-Ecosystem accounting in forests, cities and marine areas","authors":"M. Inácio ,&nbsp;E. Baltranaitė ,&nbsp;L.Valença Pinto ,&nbsp;M. Meisutovic-Akhtarieva ,&nbsp;D. Barceló ,&nbsp;P. Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101752","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101752","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA-EA) was set as an international standard framework for integrating and relating economic and environmental statistical data. Since its adoption in 2021, several scientific efforts have been established to operationalise it. Systematic literature reviews are essential for providing a comprehensive worldview on specific topics, exploring gaps, and defining future directions. In this study, we systematically review ecosystem accounting studies in the context of SEEA-EA and collate information on several aspects of its multiple accounts: ecosystem extent, condition, ecosystem services and assets. To narrow the scope, we focus our research on three ecosystem types: urban, forest and coastal and marine ecosystems. The results showed an increasing interest in the topic among scientists. Most of the works were published between 2014 and 2024 (75 studies – 98.68%) and conducted in Europe and Oceania (61 studies – 80.26%). Ecosystem extent and services (monetary) were the most studied aspects; however, most studies do not compile information on opening/closing tables. The revised studies covered other ecosystem types besides the target ones (e.g., croplands). Extent accounts were compiled mainly using European and National land cover datasets. Condition accounts were mostly compiled based on compositional state characteristics, especially using biophysical indicators. Most studies failed to define reference conditions. Regarding ecosystem services (ES), most studies focused on physical and monetary accounts, using mixed methodological approaches. Most works assessed one section, primarily regulating &amp; maintenance ES. Statistical data and market prices for biophysical and economic methodologies were preferred methods. Validation and mapping were not considered in the majority of the works. Future priorities, which are also challenges, on applying the SEEA-EA include developing guidance for (1) systematically defining appropriate reference conditions, (2) validating ES modelling outputs or at least reporting uncertainty levels, and (3) making the connection, often missing, between condition and ES accounts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101752"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144595813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
EnhancES − An open source GIS-based toolbox for assessing, mapping and enhancing ecosystem services -基于gis的开源工具箱,用于评估、绘制和增强生态系统服务
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101744
Harald Zepp , Luis Inostroza , Malte Bührs , Lars Gruenhagen , Christin Busch , Nannan Dong
The transfer of ecosystem service assessments to real-world decision-making in the public and private spheres is lagging. We introduce EnhancES, a toolbox for mapping and assessing ecosystem services developed with the open-source software QGIS. The toolbox can currently assess twelve ecosystem services (ES). We demonstrate how biophysical ES modelling can be integrated into a multistep spatial planning/design process via EnhancES. We used real information from the planning process of a residential area in Bochum, Germany. We compared the expected changes in six ES that emerged from three different urban planning designs submitted as part of an official urban planning competition, plus a revised plan. The gains and losses in standardized ES performance convey a clear message: an overall gain of ES is only possible with the revised plan. Acknowledging ES as a fundamental basis for human well-being should put them at the centre of decision-making, because marginal valuation over different development alternatives is the way forward.
将生态系统服务评估转移到公共和私人领域的实际决策方面是滞后的。我们介绍了enhance,这是一个用开源软件QGIS开发的用于绘制和评估生态系统服务的工具箱。该工具箱目前可以评估12种生态系统服务功能。我们演示了如何通过增强将生物物理ES建模集成到多步骤空间规划/设计过程中。我们使用了德国波鸿一个住宅区规划过程中的真实信息。我们比较了作为官方城市规划竞赛的一部分提交的三种不同城市规划设计中出现的六个ES的预期变化,以及修订后的计划。标准化ES性能的收益和损失传达了一个明确的信息:ES的总体收益只有通过修订计划才有可能实现。承认生态环境是人类福祉的基本基础,应该使它们成为决策的中心,因为对不同发展选择的边际估值是前进的方向。
{"title":"EnhancES − An open source GIS-based toolbox for assessing, mapping and enhancing ecosystem services","authors":"Harald Zepp ,&nbsp;Luis Inostroza ,&nbsp;Malte Bührs ,&nbsp;Lars Gruenhagen ,&nbsp;Christin Busch ,&nbsp;Nannan Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101744","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101744","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transfer of ecosystem service assessments to real-world decision-making in the public and private spheres is lagging. We introduce EnhancES, a toolbox for mapping and assessing ecosystem services developed with the open-source software QGIS. The toolbox can currently assess twelve ecosystem services (ES). We demonstrate how biophysical ES modelling can be integrated into a multistep spatial planning/design process via EnhancES. We used real information from the planning process of a residential area in Bochum, Germany. We compared the expected changes in six ES that emerged from three different urban planning designs submitted as part of an official urban planning competition, plus a revised plan. The gains and losses in standardized ES performance convey a clear message: an overall gain of ES is only possible with the revised plan. Acknowledging ES as a fundamental basis for human well-being should put them at the centre of decision-making, because marginal valuation over different development alternatives is the way forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101744"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144330158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review 构建司法与生态系统服务之间的关系:系统回顾
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755
Bruno Locatelli , Felipe Benra , Davide Geneletti , Lasse Loft , Jacqueline Loos , Barbara Schröter , Klara Winkler , Brenda Maria Zoderer
Ecosystem services (ES) are integral to environmental justice, in particular because they unevenly contribute to the well-being of different communities. Effective ES management and governance can promote equitable access and ensure that marginalized groups are not excluded from ES benefits, while recognizing the interests of multiple stakeholders and fostering fair decision making. Although environmental justice is a multifaceted concept that encompasses distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions, most of the research on justice in ES has focused primarily on distributional aspects. Recent reviews indicate a growing interest in integrating environmental justice concerns with ES, but also highlight gaps in understanding how the relationship between justice and ES is framed and studied in different contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify the predominant framings of the relationship between ES and justice. Through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 217 articles, examined from an environmental justice perspective, we identified five distinct framings, i.e. particular conceptualizations of the relationship between ES and justice that ultimately influence what (in)justices can be rendered visible or invisible. Each of the framings ‘Space’, ‘Access’, ‘Values’, ‘PES’ (Payment for ES), and ‘Management’ is associated with specific research questions and methods on ES, as well as specific perspectives and findings on justice. The plurality of framings identified in this review underscores the conceptual complexity of environmental justice and highlights the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives when addressing justice in relation to ES.
生态系统服务是环境正义不可或缺的组成部分,特别是因为它们对不同社区福祉的贡献并不均衡。有效的生态系统管理和治理可以促进公平获取,确保边缘化群体不被排除在生态系统福利之外,同时承认多个利益攸关方的利益,促进公平决策。虽然环境正义是一个多方面的概念,包括分配、程序和认可维度,但大多数关于环境正义的研究主要集中在分配方面。最近的评论表明,人们对将环境正义问题与环境科学相结合的兴趣日益浓厚,但也突出了在理解如何在不同背景下构建和研究环境正义与环境科学之间的关系方面的差距。我们对科学文献进行了系统的回顾,以确定ES与正义之间关系的主要框架。通过对217篇文章的定性和定量分析,从环境正义的角度进行了检查,我们确定了五个不同的框架,即ES与正义之间关系的特定概念,这些概念最终影响了正义的可见或不可见。“空间”、“获取”、“价值”、“PES”和“管理”的每一个框架都与社会经济体系的具体研究问题和方法,以及关于正义的具体观点和发现有关。本次审查中确定的多种框架强调了环境正义概念的复杂性,并强调了在解决与环境正义有关的正义问题时参与不同观点的重要性。
{"title":"Framing the relationship between justice and ecosystem services: A systematic review","authors":"Bruno Locatelli ,&nbsp;Felipe Benra ,&nbsp;Davide Geneletti ,&nbsp;Lasse Loft ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Loos ,&nbsp;Barbara Schröter ,&nbsp;Klara Winkler ,&nbsp;Brenda Maria Zoderer","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101755","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecosystem services (ES) are integral to environmental justice, in particular because they unevenly contribute to the well-being of different communities. Effective ES management and governance can promote equitable access and ensure that marginalized groups are not excluded from ES benefits, while recognizing the interests of multiple stakeholders and fostering fair decision making. Although environmental justice is a multifaceted concept that encompasses distributive, procedural, and recognition dimensions, most of the research on justice in ES has focused primarily on distributional aspects. Recent reviews indicate a growing interest in integrating environmental justice concerns with ES, but also highlight gaps in understanding how the relationship between justice and ES is framed and studied in different contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the scientific literature to identify the predominant framings of the relationship between ES and justice. Through a qualitative and quantitative analysis of 217 articles, examined from an environmental justice perspective, we identified five distinct framings, i.e. particular conceptualizations of the relationship between ES and justice that ultimately influence what (in)justices can be rendered visible or invisible. Each of the framings ‘Space’, ‘Access’, ‘Values’, ‘PES’ (Payment for ES), and ‘Management’ is associated with specific research questions and methods on ES, as well as specific perspectives and findings on justice. The plurality of framings identified in this review underscores the conceptual complexity of environmental justice and highlights the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives when addressing justice in relation to ES.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101755"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144653673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nature-based solutions for urban challenges: A simple framework based on ecosystem services for a World Heritage City 基于自然的城市挑战解决方案:基于世界遗产城市生态系统服务的简单框架
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101746
B. Fernández de Manuel , L. Peña , A. Berreteaga , B. Diosdado , J. Laso , I. Ametzaga-Arregi
Urban nature projects are becoming increasingly common in cities as they contribute to reducing the impacts of the climate crisis. In this study, we developed a conceptual framework based on ecosystem services (ESs) to analyse how urban naturalisation actions (nature-based solutions, NBSs) included in urban nature projects contribute to multifunctionality. Here, multifunctionality refers to the capacity to generate multiple simultaneous ESs, indicating the extent to which the challenges identified in a city have been addressed. A multi-criteria analysis based on socioeconomic and environmental criteria, assessed using a series of descriptors linked to ESs, was used to develop a Multifunctionality Nature Project (MuNaP) index. The framework identifies the level of multifunctionality of NBSs and incorporates information for its improvement, if necessary. To validate this proposal, we calculated the multifunctionality of an urban nature project in the World Heritage City of Salamanca, Spain. Among all NBSs used in the project, tree planting was the most multifunctional, whereas the creation of bioretention sites was the least multifunctional. Increasing the values of certain criteria, such as diversity and origins, increased the multifunctionality of the urban nature project. Finally, the MuNaP index has a minimum value that ensures the multifunctionality of an urban nature project, that is, its contributions to biodiversity conservation, provision of multiple ESs, and the well-being of citizens.
城市自然项目在城市中变得越来越普遍,因为它们有助于减少气候危机的影响。在本研究中,我们开发了一个基于生态系统服务(ESs)的概念框架,以分析城市自然项目中包含的城市自然化行动(基于自然的解决方案,nbs)如何促进多功能性。这里,多功能性指的是同时产生多个ESs的能力,这表明城市中确定的挑战已经得到解决的程度。基于社会经济和环境标准的多标准分析,使用一系列与ESs相关的描述符进行评估,用于开发多功能自然项目(MuNaP)指数。该框架确定了nbs的多功能性水平,并在必要时纳入了用于改进的信息。为了验证这一建议,我们计算了西班牙萨拉曼卡世界遗产城市自然项目的多功能性。在项目中使用的所有nbs中,植树是最多功能的,而生物保留点的创建是最不多功能的。增加某些标准的价值,如多样性和起源,增加了城市自然项目的多功能性。最后,MuNaP指数有一个最小值,以确保城市自然项目的多功能性,即其对生物多样性保护、提供多种生态环境和公民福祉的贡献。
{"title":"Nature-based solutions for urban challenges: A simple framework based on ecosystem services for a World Heritage City","authors":"B. Fernández de Manuel ,&nbsp;L. Peña ,&nbsp;A. Berreteaga ,&nbsp;B. Diosdado ,&nbsp;J. Laso ,&nbsp;I. Ametzaga-Arregi","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101746","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban nature projects are becoming increasingly common in cities as they contribute to reducing the impacts of the climate crisis. In this study, we developed a conceptual framework based on ecosystem services (ESs) to analyse how urban naturalisation actions (nature-based solutions, NBSs) included in urban nature projects contribute to multifunctionality. Here, multifunctionality refers to the capacity to generate multiple simultaneous ESs, indicating the extent to which the challenges identified in a city have been addressed. A multi-criteria analysis based on socioeconomic and environmental criteria, assessed using a series of descriptors linked to ESs, was used to develop a Multifunctionality Nature Project (MuNaP) index. The framework identifies the level of multifunctionality of NBSs and incorporates information for its improvement, if necessary. To validate this proposal, we calculated the multifunctionality of an urban nature project in the World Heritage City of Salamanca, Spain. Among all NBSs used in the project, tree planting was the most multifunctional, whereas the creation of bioretention sites was the least multifunctional. Increasing the values of certain criteria, such as diversity and origins, increased the multifunctionality of the urban nature project. Finally, the MuNaP index has a minimum value that ensures the multifunctionality of an urban nature project, that is, its contributions to biodiversity conservation, provision of multiple ESs, and the well-being of citizens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101746"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144313714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Green gentrification drives socio-cultural shifts from provisioning to cultural valuation of ecosystem services 绿色高档化推动了从生态系统服务供给到文化评估的社会文化转变
IF 6.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101731
Celina Aznarez , Juan Pablo Pacheco , María Candelaria Domínguez , Isabel Gadino , Hugo Inda , Fabiana Castellarini
Gentrification influences the social distribution of Ecosystem Services (ES) which can affect their use, perception and valuation, and lead to socio-ecological conflicts. This is particularly evident in coastal urban areas, where local underprivileged communities depending on ES for their livelihoods are often displaced due to real estate and tourism activities. Here, we analyse the use, perception and valuation of ES regarding the socio-economic status in a gentrified coastal area in Uruguay with an ongoing plan of urban transformation. We combined semi-structured interviews, participatory observation and mapping, for the identification, valuation, frequency of use, main pressures and trade-offs of ES. We evidenced a contrasting use and valuation of ES between neighbourhoods of different socio-economic status. Affluent neighbourhoods mainly recognized cultural-recreational ES, with sporadic use during summertime. Contrarily, residents of underprivileged areas identified a wider range of ES, used all year long, and had a higher valuation of provisioning ES due to their high dependence for basic needs. Accelerated gentrification, driven by the local urban management plan might exacerbate ES distributive inequities, and raise environmental justice concerns due to the restricted access to ES by the highly reliant underprivileged residents. This might induce a homogenisation in the use and valuation of ES towards cultural-recreational ones, more used and valued by affluent users. We emphasise the need for inclusive urban planning that acknowledges and integrates the diverse values and dependencies on ES across different socio-economic groups, to ensure sustainable and equitable development, preserve local livelihoods, and maintain ecological integrity.
士绅化影响了生态系统服务的社会分布,影响了生态系统服务的使用、认知和价值,并导致社会生态冲突。这一点在沿海城市地区尤为明显,在那里,依靠ES谋生的当地贫困社区往往因房地产和旅游活动而流离失所。在这里,我们通过一个正在进行的城市转型计划,分析了乌拉圭一个高绅化沿海地区社会经济地位的ES的使用、感知和评估。我们结合了半结构化访谈、参与式观察和绘图,以识别、评估、使用频率、主要压力和ES的权衡。我们证明了不同社会经济地位的社区对ES的不同使用和评估。富裕的社区主要认可文化-休闲ES,在夏季偶尔使用。相反,贫困地区的居民确定了更大范围的可持续能源,全年使用,并且由于他们对基本需求的高度依赖,对提供可持续能源的评估更高。在当地城市管理计划的推动下,加速的中产阶级化可能会加剧ES分配的不平等,并由于高度依赖的贫困居民获得ES的机会有限而引发环境正义问题。这可能会导致ES的使用和评估同质化,倾向于文化娱乐,富裕用户更多地使用和重视。我们强调有必要进行包容性城市规划,承认并整合不同社会经济群体对生态环境的不同价值和依赖,以确保可持续和公平发展,保护当地生计,维护生态完整性。
{"title":"Green gentrification drives socio-cultural shifts from provisioning to cultural valuation of ecosystem services","authors":"Celina Aznarez ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Pacheco ,&nbsp;María Candelaria Domínguez ,&nbsp;Isabel Gadino ,&nbsp;Hugo Inda ,&nbsp;Fabiana Castellarini","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101731","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101731","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gentrification influences the social distribution of Ecosystem Services (ES) which can affect their use, perception and valuation, and lead to socio-ecological conflicts. This is particularly evident in coastal urban areas, where local underprivileged communities depending on ES for their livelihoods are often displaced due to real estate and tourism activities. Here, we analyse the use, perception and valuation of ES regarding the socio-economic status in a gentrified coastal area in Uruguay with an ongoing plan of urban transformation. We combined semi-structured interviews, participatory observation and mapping, for the identification, valuation, frequency of use, main pressures and trade-offs of ES. We evidenced a contrasting use and valuation of ES between neighbourhoods of different socio-economic status. Affluent neighbourhoods mainly recognized cultural-recreational ES, with sporadic use during summertime. Contrarily, residents of underprivileged areas identified a wider range of ES, used all year long, and had a higher valuation of provisioning ES due to their high dependence for basic needs. Accelerated gentrification, driven by the local urban management plan might exacerbate ES distributive inequities, and raise environmental justice concerns due to the restricted access to ES by the highly reliant underprivileged residents. This might induce a homogenisation in the use and valuation of ES towards cultural-recreational ones, more used and valued by affluent users. We emphasise the need for inclusive urban planning that acknowledges and integrates the diverse values and dependencies on ES across different socio-economic groups, to ensure sustainable and equitable development, preserve local livelihoods, and maintain ecological integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 101731"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143877538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Ecosystem Services
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1