Cambridge Review of International Affairs最新文献

英文中文

Geoffrey Edwards, Abdullah Baabood, Diana Galeeva (eds.), Post-Brexit Europe and UK: Policy Challenges Towards Iran and the GCC States Geoffrey Edwards, Abdullah Baabood, Diana Galeeva(编)，脱欧后的欧洲和英国:对伊朗和海湾合作委员会国家的政策挑战

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-04-26 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2205682

M. Javadi

引用次数: 0

Fabienne Bossuyt and Peter van Elsuwege (eds), Principled pragmatism in practice: the EU’s policy towards Russia after Crimea Fabienne Bossuyt和Peter van Elsuwege（编辑），实践中的原则实用主义：克里米亚之后欧盟对俄罗斯的政策

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2189403

Hana Raci Shillova

引用次数: 0

Edward Schatz, Slow anti-Americanism: social movements and symbolic politics in Central Asia 爱德华·沙茨：缓慢的反美主义：中亚的社会运动和象征政治

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2189401

Nick Cheesman

引用次数: 0

Letter from the editors 编辑的来信

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2189390

Martin Kirsch, Anni Roth Hjermann

In the second issue of Volume 36 of the Cambridge Review of International Affairs, we are very pleased to host a Special Section that continues CRIA’s longstanding engagement with scholarship on Uneven and Combined Development (UCD). The Special Section presented in the current issue was edited alongside the UCD Special Issue in CRIA Volume 34, Issue 2, with Justin Rosenberg as guest editor. That issue, in turn, built upon the works on UCD published in CRIA Volume 22, Issue 1, of March 2009. The four articles in the present Special Section continue to push the boundaries of UCD scholarship and interrogate its central concepts: Dabney Waring argues for a distinct social multiplicity by using archaeological research, while Aslak-Antti Oksanen makes a normative contribution to UCD scholarship by building on Dussel’s liberation philosophy to include stateless peoples as agents in UCD ontology. Lastly, David Zeglen and Daniel P. G amez’ articles both explicitly challenge UCD Eurocentrism—while the former critiques ‘development’ as UCD’s temporal ideology, the latter brings UCD’s concept of ‘interaction’ in dialogue with theories of ‘relational’ processes of colonisation and racialisation from Critical Race Theory and indigenous thinkers. We are also proud to present three standalone research articles in this issue. Daniel Arbucias compares bargaining power in strife between governments and multinational corporations (MNC) in oil-rich Venezuela versus diamondrich Tanzania. Gregory P. Corning studies Japan’s negotiations on regulatory convergence with the US in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and with the EU in the Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement (JEEPA), and highlights the importance of path dependence created by existing interstate institutional arrangements. Lastly, Daniel Morales Ruvalcaba presents a theoreticalmethodological framework for assessing distribution of power within the periphery and the rise of fall of peripheral (or ‘weak’) states. Lastly, this issue features three book reviews: Mohamed Alrmizan reviews Turkey in Africa Turkey’s Strategic Involvement in Sub-Saharan Africa by Federico Donelli, Nick Cheesman reviews Edward Schatz’ Slow anti-Americanism: Social movements and symbolic politics in Central Asia, and Hani Raci Shillova reviews Principled Pragmatism in Practice: The EU’s Policy towards Russia after Crimea, edited by Fabienne Bossuyt and Peter van Elsuwege. We would like to thank the contributors for choosing CRIA as the outlet for their path-breaking research. We also thank all the reviewers, whose work remains indispensable to our journal. Lastly, we thank our excellent editorial team, as well as previous editorial members of CRIA, who not only were instrumental in editing this present issue, but who also continue to inspire and share their experience in our day-to-day work with CRIA. CRIA welcomes proposals for special issues (directed to the Editors in Chief). The journal is especially interested in work that of

在《剑桥国际事务评论》第36卷第二期中，我们非常高兴地主办了一个特别部分，该部分延续了CRIA长期以来对不均匀和联合发展（UCD）学术的参与。本期特刊与《国际广播电台》第34卷第2期的UCD特刊一起编辑，贾斯汀·罗森伯格担任客座编辑。这一期又建立在2009年3月发表在CRIA第22卷第1期的UCD作品的基础上。本特刊中的四篇文章继续突破了UCD学术的界限，并质疑了其核心概念：Dabney Waring利用考古研究主张独特的社会多样性，而Aslak Antti Oksanen通过建立在Dussel的解放哲学基础上，将无国籍人纳入UCD本体论，为UCD学术做出了规范性贡献。最后，David Zeglen和Daniel P.G amez的文章都明确挑战了UCD的欧洲中心主义——前者批评“发展”是UCD的时间意识形态，后者将UCD的“互动”概念与批判性种族理论和本土思想家关于殖民和种族化“关系”过程的理论进行了对话。我们也很自豪在本期发表三篇独立的研究文章。Daniel Arbucias比较了石油资源丰富的委内瑞拉和钻石资源丰富的坦桑尼亚政府和跨国公司之间冲突的议价能力。Gregory P.Corning研究了日本在跨太平洋伙伴关系协定（TPP）中与美国以及在日本-欧盟经济伙伴关系协定中与欧盟就监管趋同进行的谈判，并强调了现有州际制度安排造成的路径依赖的重要性。最后，Daniel Morales Ruvalcaba提出了一个理论方法框架，用于评估外围国家内部的权力分配和外围（或“弱”）国家的兴衰。最后，本期共有三篇书评：穆罕默德·阿尔米赞（Mohamed Alrmizan）评论了费德里科·多内利（Federico Donelli）的《土耳其在非洲——土耳其在撒哈拉以南非洲的战略参与》（Turkey’s Strategic Injection in Sub-Sahanan Africa），尼克·奇斯曼（Nick Cheesman）评论了爱德华·沙茨（Edward Schatz）的《缓慢的反美主义：中亚的社会运动和象征性政治》，由Fabienne Bossuyt和Peter van Elsuwege编辑。我们要感谢贡献者选择CRIA作为他们开拓性研究的出口。我们也感谢所有的审稿人，他们的工作对我们的期刊来说仍然是不可或缺的。最后，我们感谢我们优秀的编辑团队，以及CRIA的前几任编辑成员，他们不仅在本期的编辑中发挥了重要作用，而且在我们与CRIA的日常工作中继续激励和分享他们的经验。CRIA欢迎关于特刊的建议（针对主编）。该杂志特别感兴趣的是对全球问题进行深入的理论和历史分析，重新思考我们对

{"title":"Letter from the editors","authors":"Martin Kirsch, Anni Roth Hjermann","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2023.2189390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2023.2189390","url":null,"abstract":"In the second issue of Volume 36 of the Cambridge Review of International Affairs, we are very pleased to host a Special Section that continues CRIA’s longstanding engagement with scholarship on Uneven and Combined Development (UCD). The Special Section presented in the current issue was edited alongside the UCD Special Issue in CRIA Volume 34, Issue 2, with Justin Rosenberg as guest editor. That issue, in turn, built upon the works on UCD published in CRIA Volume 22, Issue 1, of March 2009. The four articles in the present Special Section continue to push the boundaries of UCD scholarship and interrogate its central concepts: Dabney Waring argues for a distinct social multiplicity by using archaeological research, while Aslak-Antti Oksanen makes a normative contribution to UCD scholarship by building on Dussel’s liberation philosophy to include stateless peoples as agents in UCD ontology. Lastly, David Zeglen and Daniel P. G amez’ articles both explicitly challenge UCD Eurocentrism—while the former critiques ‘development’ as UCD’s temporal ideology, the latter brings UCD’s concept of ‘interaction’ in dialogue with theories of ‘relational’ processes of colonisation and racialisation from Critical Race Theory and indigenous thinkers. We are also proud to present three standalone research articles in this issue. Daniel Arbucias compares bargaining power in strife between governments and multinational corporations (MNC) in oil-rich Venezuela versus diamondrich Tanzania. Gregory P. Corning studies Japan’s negotiations on regulatory convergence with the US in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and with the EU in the Japan-EU Economic Partnership Agreement (JEEPA), and highlights the importance of path dependence created by existing interstate institutional arrangements. Lastly, Daniel Morales Ruvalcaba presents a theoreticalmethodological framework for assessing distribution of power within the periphery and the rise of fall of peripheral (or ‘weak’) states. Lastly, this issue features three book reviews: Mohamed Alrmizan reviews Turkey in Africa Turkey’s Strategic Involvement in Sub-Saharan Africa by Federico Donelli, Nick Cheesman reviews Edward Schatz’ Slow anti-Americanism: Social movements and symbolic politics in Central Asia, and Hani Raci Shillova reviews Principled Pragmatism in Practice: The EU’s Policy towards Russia after Crimea, edited by Fabienne Bossuyt and Peter van Elsuwege. We would like to thank the contributors for choosing CRIA as the outlet for their path-breaking research. We also thank all the reviewers, whose work remains indispensable to our journal. Lastly, we thank our excellent editorial team, as well as previous editorial members of CRIA, who not only were instrumental in editing this present issue, but who also continue to inspire and share their experience in our day-to-day work with CRIA. CRIA welcomes proposals for special issues (directed to the Editors in Chief). The journal is especially interested in work that of","PeriodicalId":51580,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","volume":"36 1","pages":"143 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49302184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Federico Donelli, Turkey in Africa Turkey’s strategic involvement in Sub-Saharan Africa 费德里科·多内利，土耳其在非洲的战略参与

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2189400

Mohammed Alrmizan

引用次数: 0

Small states as helpless pawns? Panama’s diplomatic strategy over the Taiwan Strait 小国是无助的棋子？巴拿马在台湾海峡的外交战略

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2170872

Chen Xiang, Q. Xin

引用次数: 0

The cultural dilemmas of uneven and combined development (UCD): ‘the biggest agony of the Turkish spirit’ 不均衡和综合发展的文化困境（UCD）：“土耳其精神的最大痛苦”

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2170871

Faruk Yalvaç, Öznur Akcalı

引用次数: 0

Unforeignness: Commonwealth rule and imperial citizenship 排外性:联邦统治和帝国公民权

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-01-09 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2165902

Zaki Nahaboo

引用次数: 0

Letter from the editors 编辑的来信

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2159716

Italo Brandimarte, Martin Kirsch

引用次数: 0

Diversity in foreign policy requires new histories of international thought 外交政策的多样性需要新的国际思想史

IF 1.4 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2023.2159695

Rebecca Turkington

Of the thousands of references to historical figures across sixty disciplinary and intellectual histories of International Relations (IR) published since 1929, Patricia Owens (2018) found only 2.94 percent referred to women—79 individuals across the entire trajectory of international thought. Women’s International Thought: A New History, edited by Owens and Katharina Rietzler, is a first corrective to this disciplinary exclusion, pulling back a strip of lacklustre wallpaper to reveal a far more interesting pattern beneath. The book’s promise is two-fold: to begin to remedy the erasure of women from the disciplinary history of IR, and to expand the scope of what constitutes international thinking. Its contributions reveal a diverse array of thinkers, whose restitution enriches the discipline, and could have ripple effects in the world of contemporary IR practice. The volume’s fifteen chapters profile women from academia, policy, advocacy, and journalism, but point beyond these individual thinkers to new themes and paths other researchers will inevitably take up. As an inter-disciplinary project, the book has much to offer to a wide range of scholars. Beyond its obvious contributions to history and IR, the thinkers profiled bring lost perspectives to international law, security studies, political science, economics, and gender and race studies. Importantly, this volume and its broader project of rewriting women into the IR canon has implications for IR practitioners at a time when the field is grappling with urgent questions of diversity and relevance. The exclusion of women—especially women of colour—from IR theory and history is mirrored in IR practice. Recently, renewed efforts to address these disparities have called attention to the risks of homogenous groupthink. In the United States, the context with which I am most familiar, the latest National Security Strategy even recognises a diverse security workforce as a strategic asset. Calls for change have manifested in related demands to diversify representation in traditional IR spaces—especially leading think tanks and formal government institutions—and to build a more expansive pipeline through updated curricula and foreign affairs education. Women’s International Thought speaks directly to these challenges, offering a new array of diverse role models, an expanded vision of what kind of work can be considered international thinking, and a strong case for the centrality of gender and race analysis to a comprehensive understanding of international affairs.

自1929年以来，帕特里夏·欧文斯（Patricia Owens，2018）在出版的60部国际关系学科和知识史中引用了数千位历史人物，其中只有2.94%的人提到了女性，即整个国际思想轨迹中的79人。Owens和Katharina Rietzler编辑的《女性国际思想：新历史》是对这种学科排斥的第一次纠正，它收回了一条暗淡的壁纸，露出了下面一个有趣得多的图案。这本书的承诺有两个方面：开始纠正IR学科史上对女性的抹杀，并扩大国际思维的范围。它的贡献揭示了一系列不同的思想家，他们的回归丰富了学科，并可能在当代IR实践的世界中产生连锁反应。该卷的15章介绍了来自学术界、政策界、倡导界和新闻界的女性，但指出了超越这些个人思想家的新主题和其他研究人员将不可避免地走上的道路。作为一个跨学科的项目，这本书有很多东西可以提供给广泛的学者。除了对历史和IR的明显贡献外，所描述的思想家还为国际法、安全研究、政治学、经济学以及性别和种族研究带来了迷失的视角。重要的是，在该领域正在努力解决多样性和相关性的紧迫问题之际，这本书及其将女性改写为IR经典的更广泛项目对IR从业者产生了影响。将女性——尤其是有色人种女性——排除在IR理论和历史之外，反映在IR实践中。最近，解决这些差异的新努力引起了人们对同质群体思维风险的关注。在我最熟悉的美国，最新的《国家安全战略》甚至承认多元化的安全劳动力是一种战略资产。变革的呼声体现在相关要求上，即在传统的IR空间——特别是领先的智库和正式的政府机构——实现代表性的多样化，并通过更新课程和外交教育建立一个更广泛的渠道。《妇女国际思想》直接回应了这些挑战，提供了一系列不同的新榜样，对什么样的工作可以被视为国际思想有了更广泛的认识，并有力地证明了性别和种族分析对全面理解国际事务的中心地位。

{"title":"Diversity in foreign policy requires new histories of international thought","authors":"Rebecca Turkington","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2023.2159695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2023.2159695","url":null,"abstract":"Of the thousands of references to historical figures across sixty disciplinary and intellectual histories of International Relations (IR) published since 1929, Patricia Owens (2018) found only 2.94 percent referred to women—79 individuals across the entire trajectory of international thought. Women’s International Thought: A New History, edited by Owens and Katharina Rietzler, is a first corrective to this disciplinary exclusion, pulling back a strip of lacklustre wallpaper to reveal a far more interesting pattern beneath. The book’s promise is two-fold: to begin to remedy the erasure of women from the disciplinary history of IR, and to expand the scope of what constitutes international thinking. Its contributions reveal a diverse array of thinkers, whose restitution enriches the discipline, and could have ripple effects in the world of contemporary IR practice. The volume’s fifteen chapters profile women from academia, policy, advocacy, and journalism, but point beyond these individual thinkers to new themes and paths other researchers will inevitably take up. As an inter-disciplinary project, the book has much to offer to a wide range of scholars. Beyond its obvious contributions to history and IR, the thinkers profiled bring lost perspectives to international law, security studies, political science, economics, and gender and race studies. Importantly, this volume and its broader project of rewriting women into the IR canon has implications for IR practitioners at a time when the field is grappling with urgent questions of diversity and relevance. The exclusion of women—especially women of colour—from IR theory and history is mirrored in IR practice. Recently, renewed efforts to address these disparities have called attention to the risks of homogenous groupthink. In the United States, the context with which I am most familiar, the latest National Security Strategy even recognises a diverse security workforce as a strategic asset. Calls for change have manifested in related demands to diversify representation in traditional IR spaces—especially leading think tanks and formal government institutions—and to build a more expansive pipeline through updated curricula and foreign affairs education. Women’s International Thought speaks directly to these challenges, offering a new array of diverse role models, an expanded vision of what kind of work can be considered international thinking, and a strong case for the centrality of gender and race analysis to a comprehensive understanding of international affairs.","PeriodicalId":51580,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","volume":"36 1","pages":"96 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43505936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀