Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2122209
X. Yong, Chen Junya
Abstract The absolute poverty eliminated by China has been a chronic affliction of human society. In the course of modernization, China has completed the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects, thus embarking on a path of Chinese-style modernization that is committed to poverty eradication and common prosperity. Eradicating poverty and its root causes is a social project that transformed human society, creating a miracle on earth. The current and continuing success of this project lies in China’s unique national capacity for good governance, including its national capacity for mobilization, organization, transformation, development, and integration. This capacity is determined by the nature of the socialist system; the “sacred mission” of the Communist Party of China (CPC) provides it with inexhaustible impetus and a fundamental institutional guarantee. The national capacity for good governance is a specific manifestation of China’s institutional strengths.
{"title":"National Capacity for Good Governance: Why Has the Social Project for Poverty Eradication Been Successful?","authors":"X. Yong, Chen Junya","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122209","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The absolute poverty eliminated by China has been a chronic affliction of human society. In the course of modernization, China has completed the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects, thus embarking on a path of Chinese-style modernization that is committed to poverty eradication and common prosperity. Eradicating poverty and its root causes is a social project that transformed human society, creating a miracle on earth. The current and continuing success of this project lies in China’s unique national capacity for good governance, including its national capacity for mobilization, organization, transformation, development, and integration. This capacity is determined by the nature of the socialist system; the “sacred mission” of the Communist Party of China (CPC) provides it with inexhaustible impetus and a fundamental institutional guarantee. The national capacity for good governance is a specific manifestation of China’s institutional strengths.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47254713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2122216
Chen Weixing
Abstract In this dialogue between Chen Weixing and Daniel Miller, the influence of internet technology means that culture is no longer a remote, distant, romantic idyll. Local globalization and global localization have appeared on the scene. As people interact and communicate with each other, a pattern forms: “You are in me and I in you.”
{"title":"Ideals and Prospects for Anthropology and Communication Research in the Digital Age","authors":"Chen Weixing","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122216","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this dialogue between Chen Weixing and Daniel Miller, the influence of internet technology means that culture is no longer a remote, distant, romantic idyll. Local globalization and global localization have appeared on the scene. As people interact and communicate with each other, a pattern forms: “You are in me and I in you.”","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45363615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2122217
Luo Hongguang
Abstract In this dialogue, Luo Hongguang and Yama Yoshiyuki deal with the area of socialized wealth distribution, i.e., the distribution of wealth in society; sees exchange as labor in the broad sense; and points out that among the many systems of exchange, some reflect class but others do not have a class nature, e.g. family division of labor does not fall under class. The social status of family members (their class attributes) does not affect their division of labor and consumption patterns, and even family labor serves as both production and consumption in the household livelihood.
{"title":"Gift Theory as a Gift to the Future","authors":"Luo Hongguang","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122217","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this dialogue, Luo Hongguang and Yama Yoshiyuki deal with the area of socialized wealth distribution, i.e., the distribution of wealth in society; sees exchange as labor in the broad sense; and points out that among the many systems of exchange, some reflect class but others do not have a class nature, e.g. family division of labor does not fall under class. The social status of family members (their class attributes) does not affect their division of labor and consumption patterns, and even family labor serves as both production and consumption in the household livelihood.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41489482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2122214
Cai Hua
Abstract In this dialogue, Cai Hua and Maurice Godelier ask whether there has been a change in the research entity. This question concerns the representation of the “world of the other” and its impact on the intellectual world since the advent of postmodernism. Cai Hua states that when he was an overseas student in France in the 1980s, he could not see any traces of colonization. The postmodern movement is simply a kind of emotional catharsis and cannot be called “scientific research” in a rigorous sense. As a scientist, if your position is neutral, you cannot see the other in a dichotomous way; the other is simply what you research, and you are not part of the other.
{"title":"The Substantive Entity and Conceptual Ontology of the Object of Social Science Research and the Future of Anthropology","authors":"Cai Hua","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122214","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this dialogue, Cai Hua and Maurice Godelier ask whether there has been a change in the research entity. This question concerns the representation of the “world of the other” and its impact on the intellectual world since the advent of postmodernism. Cai Hua states that when he was an overseas student in France in the 1980s, he could not see any traces of colonization. The postmodern movement is simply a kind of emotional catharsis and cannot be called “scientific research” in a rigorous sense. As a scientist, if your position is neutral, you cannot see the other in a dichotomous way; the other is simply what you research, and you are not part of the other.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46299330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2122210
Zhu Zhenwu, Liang Dan
Abstract The explosion of African literatures in 2021 is not a coincidence, but is dictated by the continent’s decolonial, diasporic and hybrid cultural manifestations, its more than a hundred years of struggle for cross-regional integration, its spirit of vigorous and persistent action, and the unique attraction of an Africanness that upholds its selfhood, bridges the gaps, and remembers its history but looks to the future. The diasporic characteristic of attending to, absorbing and squarely facing the tension of heterogeneous cultures means that indigenous African literatures contain a distinctive world consciousness and rational philosophy. They have given rise to diverse civilizations marked by dialogue, inclusiveness and the contemporary spirit of African nations, enabling African literatures to participate effectively in the dialogue of world literature and in new patterns of civilization, displaying as they do a strong vitality, creativity and influence in the positive-sum game with Western culture. This will provide positive encouragement to the mutual learning, integration, harmony, symbiosis and coexistence of civilizations.
{"title":"The Africanness of African Literatures and New Patterns in Human Civilization","authors":"Zhu Zhenwu, Liang Dan","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122210","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The explosion of African literatures in 2021 is not a coincidence, but is dictated by the continent’s decolonial, diasporic and hybrid cultural manifestations, its more than a hundred years of struggle for cross-regional integration, its spirit of vigorous and persistent action, and the unique attraction of an Africanness that upholds its selfhood, bridges the gaps, and remembers its history but looks to the future. The diasporic characteristic of attending to, absorbing and squarely facing the tension of heterogeneous cultures means that indigenous African literatures contain a distinctive world consciousness and rational philosophy. They have given rise to diverse civilizations marked by dialogue, inclusiveness and the contemporary spirit of African nations, enabling African literatures to participate effectively in the dialogue of world literature and in new patterns of civilization, displaying as they do a strong vitality, creativity and influence in the positive-sum game with Western culture. This will provide positive encouragement to the mutual learning, integration, harmony, symbiosis and coexistence of civilizations.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46769857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2122208
Zhou Xin
Abstract In order to further promote the reform of the procuratorial system and mechanism, it is necessary to first clarify the nature and developmental laws of procuratorial power. By its nature, China’s procuratorial power originates from the Marxist theory of state. Under the joint influence of historical logic, the political system and actual national conditions, it demonstrates both universality and Chinese characteristics. On the basis of constitutional norms, we can discover the general laws of the evolution of procuratorial power in China; that is, on the premise of maintaining its basic attribute as legal supervisory power, its extension and operational mode are constantly readjusted in line with the changing times to realize the synchronous development of procuratorial power and national governance. In recent years, the development of Chinese procuratorial power has shown new features in actively responding to the needs of the times. This is the joint outcome of changes in the main social contradictions, the adjustment of the state power structure, the reform of the judicial system and mechanisms, etc. In constructing a socialist procuratorial system with Chinese characteristics, we should adhere to the nature of procuratorial power as legal oversight, and respect the general laws of its development. In accordance with social demands and judicial practice, we should further expand the extension of procuratorial power, innovate and enrich its operational mechanisms and realize its dynamic adjustment in tune with the times.
{"title":"The New Development of Procuratorial Power in China","authors":"Zhou Xin","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2122208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2122208","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to further promote the reform of the procuratorial system and mechanism, it is necessary to first clarify the nature and developmental laws of procuratorial power. By its nature, China’s procuratorial power originates from the Marxist theory of state. Under the joint influence of historical logic, the political system and actual national conditions, it demonstrates both universality and Chinese characteristics. On the basis of constitutional norms, we can discover the general laws of the evolution of procuratorial power in China; that is, on the premise of maintaining its basic attribute as legal supervisory power, its extension and operational mode are constantly readjusted in line with the changing times to realize the synchronous development of procuratorial power and national governance. In recent years, the development of Chinese procuratorial power has shown new features in actively responding to the needs of the times. This is the joint outcome of changes in the main social contradictions, the adjustment of the state power structure, the reform of the judicial system and mechanisms, etc. In constructing a socialist procuratorial system with Chinese characteristics, we should adhere to the nature of procuratorial power as legal oversight, and respect the general laws of its development. In accordance with social demands and judicial practice, we should further expand the extension of procuratorial power, innovate and enrich its operational mechanisms and realize its dynamic adjustment in tune with the times.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48235993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2093065
Zhang Yan
Abstract A number of countries have hastened to pass legislation that protects their cybersecurity, with a consequent trend of cyberspace nationalization. However, as this trend intensifies, the contradictions inherent in the cybersecurity order become more striking. This stems from the fact that the legislative purpose of closed national legislation is difficult to achieve in the face of trans-personal, trans-national and trans-spatial cyberspace. What underlies these contradictions is the dualistic thinking of physical space vs cyberspace. The differences in the understanding of data between the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC (2016) and the Data Security Law of the PRC (2021) are heavily influenced by this line of thinking. Therefore, we need to return, inter alia, to the trans-personal, trans-national, trans-spatial nature of cyberspace itself to reflect on current cybersecurity legislation in China. On the basis of clarifying the dialectical relationship between sovereign states and the community with a shared future in cyberspace, we should establish the dual foundation of cybersecurity legislation and construct a set of fundamental norms for such legislation that contains legislative ideas, basic principles, and legislative system components.
{"title":"The Dual Foundation of Cybersecurity Legislation","authors":"Zhang Yan","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2093065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2093065","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A number of countries have hastened to pass legislation that protects their cybersecurity, with a consequent trend of cyberspace nationalization. However, as this trend intensifies, the contradictions inherent in the cybersecurity order become more striking. This stems from the fact that the legislative purpose of closed national legislation is difficult to achieve in the face of trans-personal, trans-national and trans-spatial cyberspace. What underlies these contradictions is the dualistic thinking of physical space vs cyberspace. The differences in the understanding of data between the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC (2016) and the Data Security Law of the PRC (2021) are heavily influenced by this line of thinking. Therefore, we need to return, inter alia, to the trans-personal, trans-national, trans-spatial nature of cyberspace itself to reflect on current cybersecurity legislation in China. On the basis of clarifying the dialectical relationship between sovereign states and the community with a shared future in cyberspace, we should establish the dual foundation of cybersecurity legislation and construct a set of fundamental norms for such legislation that contains legislative ideas, basic principles, and legislative system components.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41563895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2123663
Wang Weidong
Abstract Underlying modern Chinese sanwen (or prose) are long-established wenzhang traditions. Emerging in the transformation from traditional wenzhang to modern literature, modern Chinese sanwen had gone through a complicated process before acquiring its atypical stylistic characteristics and being relegated to a marginal place in modern literature. Nevertheless, this has also provided it with the possibility of breaking through its current dilemma. A reconstructed theory of Chinese sanwen must center on the core of “the person—the writings,” to build a four-level theoretical structure comprised of knowledge and experience, thought and emotion, spirit and mind realm, and style and form. It should also draw on the wisdoms of traditional Chinese thought and art and incorporate the historical characteristics of wenzhang (its basis on the Dao or Way, connection with history, engagement with reality, and manifestation in literature), so as to pave a path between the person and the writings and establish a viable evaluative sanwen discourse system with Chinese characteristics.
{"title":"Wenzhang Traditions and the Theoretical Reconstruction of Modern Chinese Prose (Sanwen)","authors":"Wang Weidong","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2123663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2123663","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Underlying modern Chinese sanwen (or prose) are long-established wenzhang traditions. Emerging in the transformation from traditional wenzhang to modern literature, modern Chinese sanwen had gone through a complicated process before acquiring its atypical stylistic characteristics and being relegated to a marginal place in modern literature. Nevertheless, this has also provided it with the possibility of breaking through its current dilemma. A reconstructed theory of Chinese sanwen must center on the core of “the person—the writings,” to build a four-level theoretical structure comprised of knowledge and experience, thought and emotion, spirit and mind realm, and style and form. It should also draw on the wisdoms of traditional Chinese thought and art and incorporate the historical characteristics of wenzhang (its basis on the Dao or Way, connection with history, engagement with reality, and manifestation in literature), so as to pave a path between the person and the writings and establish a viable evaluative sanwen discourse system with Chinese characteristics.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49533247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2123660
Jiao Changquan, Dong Leiming
Abstract Since 2000, China has undergone a “golden age” of livelihood security construction similar to that of the Western industrialized countries in the 1960s to 1980s. Nowadays, China has built up the world’s largest social security and housing support systems; the coverage of compulsory education has reached the average level of high-income countries; and the main health indicators are generally better than the average of middle- and highincome countries. Obviously, China is no longer a “low-welfare” country. Livelihood expenditure, with a share of GDP close to the level of developed countries around 1980, has become the principal part of public expenditure, and the central government is also playing an increasingly prominent role in ensuring people’s livelihoods. China is building a new livelihood security system with responsibility shared among multiple levels of government.
{"title":"The Path to Common Prosperity: Rising Social Construction and Livelihood Expenditure","authors":"Jiao Changquan, Dong Leiming","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2123660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2123660","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since 2000, China has undergone a “golden age” of livelihood security construction similar to that of the Western industrialized countries in the 1960s to 1980s. Nowadays, China has built up the world’s largest social security and housing support systems; the coverage of compulsory education has reached the average level of high-income countries; and the main health indicators are generally better than the average of middle- and highincome countries. Obviously, China is no longer a “low-welfare” country. Livelihood expenditure, with a share of GDP close to the level of developed countries around 1980, has become the principal part of public expenditure, and the central government is also playing an increasingly prominent role in ensuring people’s livelihoods. China is building a new livelihood security system with responsibility shared among multiple levels of government.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46063359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2022.2093055
Wang Lu
Abstract Metaphysics or the knowledge of knowledge itself is one of the main threads in the history of philosophy. Metaphysics is distinguished from “adding word” philosophy in that the latter is knowledge related to what the added words express. The essence of the distinction here is that metaphysics deals with what is a priori, while the study of adding word philosophies is empirical. Metaphysical inquiry always revolves around sentences, for knowledge is expressed in language, and sentences are the basic unit for the expression of knowledge. Sentences involve three aspects: at the linguistic level, the basic sentence pattern is “S is P”; at the level of sense, it is what language expresses; and at the reference level, the core concept is “truth.” Metaphysical inquiry always revolves around “being” and “truth,” and concerns the three levels above. The third level in particular reveals the conditions for the truth of a sentence, and helps explain the first two levels. We need to grasp the essence and characteristics of metaphysics and develop the study of metaphysics as a means of advancing philosophical research.
{"title":"On the Knowledge of Knowledge Itself","authors":"Wang Lu","doi":"10.1080/02529203.2022.2093055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2022.2093055","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Metaphysics or the knowledge of knowledge itself is one of the main threads in the history of philosophy. Metaphysics is distinguished from “adding word” philosophy in that the latter is knowledge related to what the added words express. The essence of the distinction here is that metaphysics deals with what is a priori, while the study of adding word philosophies is empirical. Metaphysical inquiry always revolves around sentences, for knowledge is expressed in language, and sentences are the basic unit for the expression of knowledge. Sentences involve three aspects: at the linguistic level, the basic sentence pattern is “S is P”; at the level of sense, it is what language expresses; and at the reference level, the core concept is “truth.” Metaphysical inquiry always revolves around “being” and “truth,” and concerns the three levels above. The third level in particular reveals the conditions for the truth of a sentence, and helps explain the first two levels. We need to grasp the essence and characteristics of metaphysics and develop the study of metaphysics as a means of advancing philosophical research.","PeriodicalId":51743,"journal":{"name":"中国社会科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46935815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：