Pub Date : 2023-12-15DOI: 10.1177/00754242231209430
A. Cichosz, Sylwia Karasińska
This article traces the development of agency prepositions in Old and Middle English passives, documenting the most important stages of the process and presenting them against a larger background of linguistic changes after the Norman Conquest. The study is based on large, syntactically annotated corpora of Early English, and takes into account all the main agency prepositions, that is, þurh ‘through,’ fram ‘from,’ mid ‘with,’ bi ‘by,’ and of, analyzing their token and type frequency, textual distribution, diachronic trends, collocational preferences, and use in lexically fixed formulas. The results are interpreted within the Construction Grammar framework, with the agency prepositional phrase treated as an emerging construction undergoing a slow and particularly difficult constructionalization process hindered by the restriction of the long passive to the written mode.
{"title":"The Diachronic Development of Agency Prepositions in Old and Middle English","authors":"A. Cichosz, Sylwia Karasińska","doi":"10.1177/00754242231209430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231209430","url":null,"abstract":"This article traces the development of agency prepositions in Old and Middle English passives, documenting the most important stages of the process and presenting them against a larger background of linguistic changes after the Norman Conquest. The study is based on large, syntactically annotated corpora of Early English, and takes into account all the main agency prepositions, that is, þurh ‘through,’ fram ‘from,’ mid ‘with,’ bi ‘by,’ and of, analyzing their token and type frequency, textual distribution, diachronic trends, collocational preferences, and use in lexically fixed formulas. The results are interpreted within the Construction Grammar framework, with the agency prepositional phrase treated as an emerging construction undergoing a slow and particularly difficult constructionalization process hindered by the restriction of the long passive to the written mode.","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138997568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-10DOI: 10.1177/00754242231199096
Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Concessivity in English is often associated with structures like Although it was hot, she went running. Although introduces a subordinate clause. There are also several markers of concessivity associated with coordinate structures, among them, all the same and nevertheless. The development of coordinate markers of concessivity has received little attention. Here I compare the histories of three markers that arose from expressions of identity: all the same, just the same, and at the same time. All arose at various times in Late Modern English. Rich rhetorical contexts for the development of concessive uses of all the same ‘exactly the same’ are attested in corpora. Contexts for the later development in the US of just the same are less rich, and analogy to all the same is probable. Both came to be well entrenched in concessive use and are used in clause-final as well as clause-initial and occasionally clause-medial position. By contrast, at the same time functions only marginally as a concessive. It is also used as an elaborator and is not attested in clause-final position. Data are analyzed from the perspective of Diachronic Construction Grammar. Implications for some current debates are discussed, specifically for establishing when a construction has come into being, what kinds of contexts enable this emergence, and what level of abstraction is appropriate for analysis of sets of related constructions. Finally, some modifications of hypotheses about position of connectives relative to the clause are suggested.
{"title":"“But I Hate Him Just the Same”: On the Rise of Concessive Markers with <i>Same</i>","authors":"Elizabeth Closs Traugott","doi":"10.1177/00754242231199096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231199096","url":null,"abstract":"Concessivity in English is often associated with structures like Although it was hot, she went running. Although introduces a subordinate clause. There are also several markers of concessivity associated with coordinate structures, among them, all the same and nevertheless. The development of coordinate markers of concessivity has received little attention. Here I compare the histories of three markers that arose from expressions of identity: all the same, just the same, and at the same time. All arose at various times in Late Modern English. Rich rhetorical contexts for the development of concessive uses of all the same ‘exactly the same’ are attested in corpora. Contexts for the later development in the US of just the same are less rich, and analogy to all the same is probable. Both came to be well entrenched in concessive use and are used in clause-final as well as clause-initial and occasionally clause-medial position. By contrast, at the same time functions only marginally as a concessive. It is also used as an elaborator and is not attested in clause-final position. Data are analyzed from the perspective of Diachronic Construction Grammar. Implications for some current debates are discussed, specifically for establishing when a construction has come into being, what kinds of contexts enable this emergence, and what level of abstraction is appropriate for analysis of sets of related constructions. Finally, some modifications of hypotheses about position of connectives relative to the clause are suggested.","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"93 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135092247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-06DOI: 10.1177/00754242231200460
Ming Yue, Yi Zhang
Agreement variation is a critical issue in discussing syntactic configuration and semantic integration. Two competing hypotheses have been proposed to account for how semantic integration contributes to agreement variation: the lexical-grammatical hypothesis and the notional hypothesis. Using data from NOW, a large corpus of World Englishes, this study presents a multifactorial analysis of the probabilistic factors that constrain agreement variation in it-clefts, an important but low-frequency construction, with collective nouns as clefted constituents. We employ random forests and conditional inference trees to examine how the Outer circle varieties have developed preferences different from those of the Inner circle varieties for agreement patterns of it-clefts. The principal findings include: (1) singular agreement is the default pattern worldwide, while plural agreement appears probabilistically along the continuum of collective plurality; (2) Inner circle speakers use more plural agreement than Outer circle speakers, with British English users employing more plural agreement than American English users; and (3) Semantic integration exerts more influence on Inner circle speakers in agreement implementation than on Outer circle speakers, who are more easily affected by morpho-grammatical markers. The quantitative case study on the collective noun team corroborates the lexical-grammatical hypothesis that semantic integration encourages plural agreement. This focused attention on agreement variation in it-clefts with collective nouns as clefted constituents further suggests that the extraposition analysis, rather than the expletive analysis, offers a suitable theoretical model for the syntactic configuration of the it-cleft construction.
{"title":"Semantic Integration in <i>It</i>-Clefts: A Multifactorial Exploration of Agreement Variability in World Englishes","authors":"Ming Yue, Yi Zhang","doi":"10.1177/00754242231200460","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231200460","url":null,"abstract":"Agreement variation is a critical issue in discussing syntactic configuration and semantic integration. Two competing hypotheses have been proposed to account for how semantic integration contributes to agreement variation: the lexical-grammatical hypothesis and the notional hypothesis. Using data from NOW, a large corpus of World Englishes, this study presents a multifactorial analysis of the probabilistic factors that constrain agreement variation in it-clefts, an important but low-frequency construction, with collective nouns as clefted constituents. We employ random forests and conditional inference trees to examine how the Outer circle varieties have developed preferences different from those of the Inner circle varieties for agreement patterns of it-clefts. The principal findings include: (1) singular agreement is the default pattern worldwide, while plural agreement appears probabilistically along the continuum of collective plurality; (2) Inner circle speakers use more plural agreement than Outer circle speakers, with British English users employing more plural agreement than American English users; and (3) Semantic integration exerts more influence on Inner circle speakers in agreement implementation than on Outer circle speakers, who are more easily affected by morpho-grammatical markers. The quantitative case study on the collective noun team corroborates the lexical-grammatical hypothesis that semantic integration encourages plural agreement. This focused attention on agreement variation in it-clefts with collective nouns as clefted constituents further suggests that the extraposition analysis, rather than the expletive analysis, offers a suitable theoretical model for the syntactic configuration of the it-cleft construction.","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"28 14","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135681664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-06DOI: 10.1177/00754242231201671
Claire Cowie
,
{"title":"Interview with Rajend Mesthrie","authors":"Claire Cowie","doi":"10.1177/00754242231201671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231201671","url":null,"abstract":",","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"25 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135684807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-06DOI: 10.1177/00754242231195369
Olli O. Silvennoinen
When restrictive adverbs are negated, an additive reading is produced (e.g., not only). This is particularly common in correlative constructions with a corrective part optionally introduced by but (e.g., not just in England but also in Scotland), but can also appear in other syntactic contexts. This study investigates formal and functional variation in the use of the four most common variants of negated restrictives ( not only, not just, not simply, and not merely) from the perspective of constructional and usage-based approaches to language. The study is based on a dataset of 1599 tokens, annotated for formal, functional, and extralinguistic variables, and is analyzed using hierarchical configural frequency analysis. The contrastive correlative construction not only X but ( also) Y appears as the central grammatical context for negated restrictives in English. In addition to its high frequency, not only displays the least variability in both form and function, which suggests a high degree of conventionalization. The less frequent variants of negated restrictives have more diffuse usage profiles, suggesting they are less conventionalized and may be emergent constructions which have not yet conventionalized into stable parts of the language. Methodologically, the study suggests an alternative to modeling alternations, which enables the detection of different degrees of conventionalization and which avoids conceptualizing alternations as choices conditioned by independent variables.
当限制副词被否定时，会产生附加读(例如，not only)。这在由but选择性引入纠正部分的关联结构中尤其常见(例如，不仅在英格兰，而且在苏格兰)，但也可以出现在其他句法上下文中。本研究从结构和基于用法的语言研究角度探讨了否定限制语的四种最常见变体(not only, not just, not simply, and not仅仅)在使用中的形式和功能变化。该研究基于1599个标记的数据集，对形式、功能和语言外变量进行了注释，并使用分层配置频率分析进行了分析。对比关联结构不仅是X，而且Y是英语否定限制语的中心语法语境。除了频率高外，它不仅在形式和功能上表现出最小的可变性，这表明它的约定化程度很高。不太常见的否定限制语变体有更分散的用法，这表明它们不太约定俗成，可能是紧急结构，尚未约定俗成为语言的稳定部分。在方法上，该研究提出了一种替代建模替代方案，它可以检测不同程度的常规化，并避免将替代概念化为由自变量决定的选择。
{"title":"Not Just Contrastive: Constructions with Negated Restrictives in English","authors":"Olli O. Silvennoinen","doi":"10.1177/00754242231195369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231195369","url":null,"abstract":"When restrictive adverbs are negated, an additive reading is produced (e.g., not only). This is particularly common in correlative constructions with a corrective part optionally introduced by but (e.g., not just in England but also in Scotland), but can also appear in other syntactic contexts. This study investigates formal and functional variation in the use of the four most common variants of negated restrictives ( not only, not just, not simply, and not merely) from the perspective of constructional and usage-based approaches to language. The study is based on a dataset of 1599 tokens, annotated for formal, functional, and extralinguistic variables, and is analyzed using hierarchical configural frequency analysis. The contrastive correlative construction not only X but ( also) Y appears as the central grammatical context for negated restrictives in English. In addition to its high frequency, not only displays the least variability in both form and function, which suggests a high degree of conventionalization. The less frequent variants of negated restrictives have more diffuse usage profiles, suggesting they are less conventionalized and may be emergent constructions which have not yet conventionalized into stable parts of the language. Methodologically, the study suggests an alternative to modeling alternations, which enables the detection of different degrees of conventionalization and which avoids conceptualizing alternations as choices conditioned by independent variables.","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135684826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-05DOI: 10.1177/00754242231197678
Minnie Quartey
{"title":"Book Review: Middle Class African American English","authors":"Minnie Quartey","doi":"10.1177/00754242231197678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231197678","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"63 13","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135726459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-05DOI: 10.1177/00754242231197680
Shawna Shapiro
{"title":"Book Review: English with an Accent","authors":"Shawna Shapiro","doi":"10.1177/00754242231197680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231197680","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"70 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135725821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-07-17DOI: 10.1177/00754242231186179
E. Hazenberg
MacKenzie, Laurel, George Bailey & Danielle Turton. 2022. Towards an updated dialect atlas of British English. Journal of Linguistic Geography 10(1). 46-66. McMahon, April M. S. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sutton, Selina, Paul Foulkes, David Kirk & Shaun Lawson. 2019. Voice as a design material: Sociophonetic inspired design strategies in human-computer interaction. In CHI ’19: Conference on human factors in computing systems proceedings, retrieved from https:// dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3290605.3300833. Thomas, Erik. 2011. Sociophonetics: An introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.3
{"title":"Book Reviews: Transgender Identities in the Press: A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis","authors":"E. Hazenberg","doi":"10.1177/00754242231186179","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231186179","url":null,"abstract":"MacKenzie, Laurel, George Bailey & Danielle Turton. 2022. Towards an updated dialect atlas of British English. Journal of Linguistic Geography 10(1). 46-66. McMahon, April M. S. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sutton, Selina, Paul Foulkes, David Kirk & Shaun Lawson. 2019. Voice as a design material: Sociophonetic inspired design strategies in human-computer interaction. In CHI ’19: Conference on human factors in computing systems proceedings, retrieved from https:// dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3290605.3300833. Thomas, Erik. 2011. Sociophonetics: An introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.3","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"51 1","pages":"303 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47321607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-09DOI: 10.1177/00754242231173419
I. Depraetere, Gunther Kaltenböck
This paper provides a corpus-based analysis of so-called “hedged performatives,” which, although frequently referred to in the literature, have never been the subject of an in-depth functional study. Using data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the focus is on I must/have to say, I must/have to admit, and I must/have to confess, as the hedged performatives which are among the most frequent and score highest in terms of collocational strength. The qualitative analysis identifies two main functions, viz., downtoner and emphasizer. They are shown to derive from the interplay of three co(n)textual parameters: (i) “semantic valency” of the host clause (i.e., positive, negative, or neutral semantic content), (ii) “thematic orientation” of the host clause (i.e., toward the speaker, the addressee, or a third person/the situation), and (iii) conversational “alignment” of the speaker with the interlocutor (i.e., agreement or disagreement). It is further shown that hedged performatives play an important role in rapport management, serving (mainly positive face) politeness strategies, which are captured in terms of face-preservation, face-damage, and face-boost.
{"title":"Hedged Performatives in Spoken American English: A Discourse-oriented Analysis","authors":"I. Depraetere, Gunther Kaltenböck","doi":"10.1177/00754242231173419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231173419","url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a corpus-based analysis of so-called “hedged performatives,” which, although frequently referred to in the literature, have never been the subject of an in-depth functional study. Using data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English, the focus is on I must/have to say, I must/have to admit, and I must/have to confess, as the hedged performatives which are among the most frequent and score highest in terms of collocational strength. The qualitative analysis identifies two main functions, viz., downtoner and emphasizer. They are shown to derive from the interplay of three co(n)textual parameters: (i) “semantic valency” of the host clause (i.e., positive, negative, or neutral semantic content), (ii) “thematic orientation” of the host clause (i.e., toward the speaker, the addressee, or a third person/the situation), and (iii) conversational “alignment” of the speaker with the interlocutor (i.e., agreement or disagreement). It is further shown that hedged performatives play an important role in rapport management, serving (mainly positive face) politeness strategies, which are captured in terms of face-preservation, face-damage, and face-boost.","PeriodicalId":51803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Linguistics","volume":"51 1","pages":"207 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46736194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：