{"title":"Wider das Primat des zweckrationalen Denkens: Eine Kritik am menschenunwürdigen Umgang mit sich selbst und anderen","authors":"Veronika Hilzensauer, Karin Hutflötz","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.2.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.2.2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48126123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
: The EU rule of law procedure foresees considerable consequences for a se-rious and persistent breach of the rule of law by EU Member States. This provokes the question as to what a legitimate intervention in the very core of Member State legal orders, their separation of powers, could look like. This article proposes the concept of transnationally separated powers (Gewaltengliederung in the language of Christoph Möllers ) as being suitable for such a purpose and therefore sets out to engage in preliminary considerations. The aim is to sketch the basis for establishing criteria in terms of reconstructed transnationally separated powers. However, before such criteria can be elaborated we have to consider the challenges of such an ambitious project. Finally, this article provides some concluding observations on what the core of such a transnational separation of powers might look like.
{"title":"Demokratische Legitimität, die EU-Rechtsstaatlichkeitskrise und Vorüberlegungen zu einer transnationalen Gewaltengliederung","authors":"L. Kirchmair","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.2.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.2.7","url":null,"abstract":": The EU rule of law procedure foresees considerable consequences for a se-rious and persistent breach of the rule of law by EU Member States. This provokes the question as to what a legitimate intervention in the very core of Member State legal orders, their separation of powers, could look like. This article proposes the concept of transnationally separated powers (Gewaltengliederung in the language of Christoph Möllers ) as being suitable for such a purpose and therefore sets out to engage in preliminary considerations. The aim is to sketch the basis for establishing criteria in terms of reconstructed transnationally separated powers. However, before such criteria can be elaborated we have to consider the challenges of such an ambitious project. Finally, this article provides some concluding observations on what the core of such a transnational separation of powers might look like.","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46849484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Die Klugheit des Verfahrens. Wahlverfahren, Konsens und der Wille der Mehrheit","authors":"U. Metschl","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.2.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.2.8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42387418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The so-called crisis of the democratic system which is currently discussed controversially deals with the basic question of the legitimacy of organized societies. Socially legitimizing processes are aimed at the definition and justification of democratic institutions. Those institutions can fulfill a regulating and therefore reassuring function within political systems. This is what defines their importance in today’s societies. Without the support through such regulating institutions, the social structure and organisational patterns dissolve and the democratic system falls in crisis. The question of any system’s legitimacy is therefore crucial for the structuring of all social processes and hierarchies – once a society reaches a status of legitimacy, it is considered as justified and recognized as such. Legitimized societies count as stable societies. The structures described above evolve through different social interactions and distinguish themselves by a mix of social and legal norms which are expected to be followed by all members of the society meant to be structured here. Following set norms is not implied here. Since the principle of following norms only for the sake of social adjustment is not only not acceptable but simply disfunctional, new structures ask for new reasons to justify and prove the legitimacy of the norms. Globalized societies seem to lack legitimations which is where the whole crisis is rooted which liberal-pluralistic are going through at the moment. The reservoir of nationalistic as well as liberal-pluralistic attempts of justification seems exhausted to the core. The following paper is trying to identify reasons for the current crisis of democracies as a concept. Moreover, it is analysing the basic idea of legitimation as a category of Sabrina Zucca-Soest 115 social functionality in depth. There are two basic principles. Depending on which is recognized by a society, different concepts of legitimation can be described. On an individual level, the individual’s recognition of established norms and its silent confirmation to act accordingly within a society can be understood as legitimation. On a societal level, the power that a society has over its members when imprinting core values and norms on them. Thus, two basic concepts of legitimation can be identified: The first one is based on facts to generate legitimation (descriptive approach). The second one is based on hypotheses (prescriptive approach). Only after the recognition of the theoretical background, reasons for the crises can be found, its scope can be measured and a realistic outlook on the necessary measures which need to be taken accordingly can be formulated.
{"title":"Die Krise der Demokratie - Eine Frage der Perspektive?","authors":"Sabrina Zucca-Soest","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.2.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.2.5","url":null,"abstract":"The so-called crisis of the democratic system which is currently discussed controversially deals with the basic question of the legitimacy of organized societies. Socially legitimizing processes are aimed at the definition and justification of democratic institutions. Those institutions can fulfill a regulating and therefore reassuring function within political systems. This is what defines their importance in today’s societies. Without the support through such regulating institutions, the social structure and organisational patterns dissolve and the democratic system falls in crisis. The question of any system’s legitimacy is therefore crucial for the structuring of all social processes and hierarchies – once a society reaches a status of legitimacy, it is considered as justified and recognized as such. Legitimized societies count as stable societies. The structures described above evolve through different social interactions and distinguish themselves by a mix of social and legal norms which are expected to be followed by all members of the society meant to be structured here. Following set norms is not implied here. Since the principle of following norms only for the sake of social adjustment is not only not acceptable but simply disfunctional, new structures ask for new reasons to justify and prove the legitimacy of the norms. Globalized societies seem to lack legitimations which is where the whole crisis is rooted which liberal-pluralistic are going through at the moment. The reservoir of nationalistic as well as liberal-pluralistic attempts of justification seems exhausted to the core. The following paper is trying to identify reasons for the current crisis of democracies as a concept. Moreover, it is analysing the basic idea of legitimation as a category of Sabrina Zucca-Soest 115 social functionality in depth. There are two basic principles. Depending on which is recognized by a society, different concepts of legitimation can be described. On an individual level, the individual’s recognition of established norms and its silent confirmation to act accordingly within a society can be understood as legitimation. On a societal level, the power that a society has over its members when imprinting core values and norms on them. Thus, two basic concepts of legitimation can be identified: The first one is based on facts to generate legitimation (descriptive approach). The second one is based on hypotheses (prescriptive approach). Only after the recognition of the theoretical background, reasons for the crises can be found, its scope can be measured and a realistic outlook on the necessary measures which need to be taken accordingly can be formulated.","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44285664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Populismus als Herausforderung für die konstitutionelle Demokratie","authors":"S. Kirste","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.2.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.2.6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45851627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Das ‚Wort‘ und der Krieg. Zum Sinn der Sprache zwischen Ethik und Politik","authors":"B. Liebsch","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.1.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.1.7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46572593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Zeugenschaft zwischen Ethik und Politik","authors":"Sibylle Schmidt","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.1.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.1.8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42168766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"„Wir gehen hin und her“ Versuch einer Operationalisierung des Überlegungsgleichgewichts am Beispiel der Kindes- und Erwachsenenschutzbehörde in der Schweiz","authors":"M. Lindenau, Marcel Meier Kressig","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.1.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.1.5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47453928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ethischer Materialismus. Max Horkheimer und der Widerspruch in der natürlichen Normativität","authors":"Philip Hogh","doi":"10.22613/zfpp/6.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22613/zfpp/6.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":53352,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Praktische Philosophie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43340358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：