Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.10.006
Aus dem Vorstand
{"title":"Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik e.V.","authors":"Aus dem Vorstand","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 620-629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923001228/pdfft?md5=9304bdc6e2b337a98d02b73720621824&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923001228-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.003
Maria M Aspradakis , Thierry Buchillier , Götz Kohler , Christian Kottler , Jérôme Krayenbühl
The SSRMP recommendations on reference dosimetry in kilovolt beams as used in radiation therapy were revised to establish current practice in Switzerland.
The recommendations specify the dosimetry formalism, reference class dosimeter systems and conditions used for the calibration of low and medium energy x-ray beams. Practical guidance is provided on the determination of the beam quality specifier and all corrections required for converting instrument readings to absorbed dose to water. Guidance is also provided on the determination of relative dose under non-reference conditions and on the cross calibration of instruments.
The effect of lack of electron equilibrium and influence of contaminant electrons when using thin window plane parallel chambers at x-ray tube potentials higher than 50 kV is elaborated in an appendix. In Switzerland the calibration of the reference system used for dosimetry is regulated by law. METAS and IRA are the authorities providing this calibration service to the radiotherapy departments. The last appendix of these recommendations summarise this calibration chain.
SSRMP 对放射治疗中使用的千伏光束参考剂量测定建议进行了修订,以确立瑞士的现行做法。该建议规定了剂量测定形式、参考类剂量计系统以及用于校准低能量和中等能量 X 射线光束的条件。该建议书提供了实用指南,指导如何确定光束质量规格,以及将仪器读数转换为水吸收剂量所需的所有修正。附录中详细阐述了在 X 射线管电位高于 50 千伏的情况下使用薄窗平面平行腔时缺乏电子平衡的影响和杂质电子的影响。在瑞士,用于剂量测定的参考系统的校准受法律约束。METAS 和 IRA 是为放射治疗部门提供校准服务的机构。本建议书的最后一个附录总结了这一校准链。
{"title":"SSRMP Recommendations No 9: Reference dosimetry in low and medium energy x-ray beams","authors":"Maria M Aspradakis , Thierry Buchillier , Götz Kohler , Christian Kottler , Jérôme Krayenbühl","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The SSRMP recommendations on reference dosimetry in kilovolt beams as used in radiation therapy were revised to establish current practice in Switzerland.</p><p>The recommendations specify the dosimetry formalism, reference class dosimeter systems and conditions used for the calibration of low and medium energy x-ray beams. Practical guidance is provided on the determination of the beam quality specifier and all corrections required for converting instrument readings to absorbed dose to water. Guidance is also provided on the determination of relative dose under non-reference conditions and on the cross calibration of instruments.</p><p>The effect of lack of electron equilibrium and influence of contaminant electrons when using thin window plane parallel chambers at x-ray tube potentials higher than 50<!--> <!-->kV is elaborated in an appendix. In Switzerland the calibration of the reference system used for dosimetry is regulated by law. METAS and IRA are the authorities providing this calibration service to the radiotherapy departments. The last appendix of these recommendations summarise this calibration chain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 601-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001362/pdfft?md5=7010f5938db47cdcfb3586cb6766ddc7&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001362-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9841666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.07.004
Giulio Rossi , Thomas Failing , Mark Gainey , Michael Kollefrath , Frank Hensley , Klemens Zink , Dimos Baltas
<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To employ the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector (mDD and mSD, both PTW-Freiburg, Germany) to determine the dose rate around a HDR <sup>192</sup>Ir brachytherapy source (model mHDR-v2r, Elekta AB, Sweden).</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> The detectors were calibrated with a <sup>60</sup>Co beam at the PTW Calibration Laboratory. Measurements around the <sup>192</sup>Ir source were performed inside a PTW MP3 water phantom. The detectors were placed at selected points of measurement at radial distances <em>r</em>, ranging from 0.5 to 10 cm, keeping the polar angle <em>θ</em> = 90°. Additional measurements were performed with the mSD at fixed distances <em>r</em> = 1, 3 and 5 cm, with <em>θ</em> varying from 0 to 150°, 0 to 166°, and 0 to 168°, respectively. The corresponding mDD readings were already available from a previous work (Rossi et al., 2020). The beam quality correction factor of both detectors, as well as a phantom effect correction factor to account for the difference between the experimental geometry and that assumed in the TG-43 formalism, were determined using the Monte Carlo (MC) toolkit EGSnrc. The beam quality correction factor was factorized into energy dependence and volume-averaging correction factors. Using the abovementioned MC-based factors, the dose rate to water at the different points of measurement in TG-43 conditions was obtained from the measured readings, and was compared to the dose rate calculated according to the TG-43 formalism.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The beam quality correction factor was considerably closer to unity for the mDD than for the mSD. The energy dependence of the mDD showed a very weak radial dependence, similar to the previous findings showing a weak angular dependence as well (Rossi et al., 2020). Conversely, the energy dependence of the mSD decreased significantly with increasing distances, and also showed a considerably more pronounced angular dependence, especially for the smallest angles. The volume-averaging showed a similar radial dependence for both detectors: the correction had a maximal impact at 0.5 cm and then approached unity for larger distances, as expected. Concerning the angular dependence, the correction for the mSD was also similar to the one previously determined for the mDD (Rossi et al., 2020): a maximal impact was observed at <em>θ</em> = 0°, with values tending to unity for larger angles. In general, the volume-averaging was less pronounced for the mSD due to the smaller sensitive volume radius. After the application of the MC-based factors, differences between mDD dose rate measurements and TG-43 dose rate calculations ranged from −2.6% to +4.3%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For the mSD, the differences ranged from −3.1% to +5.2%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For both detectors, all differences but one were within the combined uncertainty (<em>k</em> = 2). The differences of the mSD from the mD
{"title":"Determination of the dose rate around a HDR 192Ir brachytherapy source with the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector","authors":"Giulio Rossi , Thomas Failing , Mark Gainey , Michael Kollefrath , Frank Hensley , Klemens Zink , Dimos Baltas","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To employ the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector (mDD and mSD, both PTW-Freiburg, Germany) to determine the dose rate around a HDR <sup>192</sup>Ir brachytherapy source (model mHDR-v2r, Elekta AB, Sweden).</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> The detectors were calibrated with a <sup>60</sup>Co beam at the PTW Calibration Laboratory. Measurements around the <sup>192</sup>Ir source were performed inside a PTW MP3 water phantom. The detectors were placed at selected points of measurement at radial distances <em>r</em>, ranging from 0.5 to 10 cm, keeping the polar angle <em>θ</em> = 90°. Additional measurements were performed with the mSD at fixed distances <em>r</em> = 1, 3 and 5 cm, with <em>θ</em> varying from 0 to 150°, 0 to 166°, and 0 to 168°, respectively. The corresponding mDD readings were already available from a previous work (Rossi et al., 2020). The beam quality correction factor of both detectors, as well as a phantom effect correction factor to account for the difference between the experimental geometry and that assumed in the TG-43 formalism, were determined using the Monte Carlo (MC) toolkit EGSnrc. The beam quality correction factor was factorized into energy dependence and volume-averaging correction factors. Using the abovementioned MC-based factors, the dose rate to water at the different points of measurement in TG-43 conditions was obtained from the measured readings, and was compared to the dose rate calculated according to the TG-43 formalism.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The beam quality correction factor was considerably closer to unity for the mDD than for the mSD. The energy dependence of the mDD showed a very weak radial dependence, similar to the previous findings showing a weak angular dependence as well (Rossi et al., 2020). Conversely, the energy dependence of the mSD decreased significantly with increasing distances, and also showed a considerably more pronounced angular dependence, especially for the smallest angles. The volume-averaging showed a similar radial dependence for both detectors: the correction had a maximal impact at 0.5 cm and then approached unity for larger distances, as expected. Concerning the angular dependence, the correction for the mSD was also similar to the one previously determined for the mDD (Rossi et al., 2020): a maximal impact was observed at <em>θ</em> = 0°, with values tending to unity for larger angles. In general, the volume-averaging was less pronounced for the mSD due to the smaller sensitive volume radius. After the application of the MC-based factors, differences between mDD dose rate measurements and TG-43 dose rate calculations ranged from −2.6% to +4.3%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For the mSD, the differences ranged from −3.1% to +5.2%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For both detectors, all differences but one were within the combined uncertainty (<em>k</em> = 2). The differences of the mSD from the mD","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 463-478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000861/pdfft?md5=757a0dfeacd000a7b89d5837c4d2acf5&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000861-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33446157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008
Ali Asadi , Azadeh Akhavanallaf , Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini , Naser Vosoughi , Habib Zaidi
Objective
To develop and validate a versatile Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose calculation engine to support MC-based dose verification of treatment planning systems (TPSs) and quality assurance (QA) workflows in proton therapy.
Methods
The GATE MC toolkit was used to simulate a fixed horizontal active scan-based proton beam delivery (SIEMENS IONTRIS). Within the nozzle, two primary and secondary dose monitors have been designed to enable the comparison of the accuracy of dose estimation from MC simulations with respect to physical QA measurements. The developed beam model was validated against a series of commissioning measurements using pinpoint chambers and 2D array ionization chambers (IC) in terms of lateral profiles and depth dose distributions. Furthermore, beam delivery module and treatment planning has been validated against the literature deploying various clinical test cases of the AAPM TG‐119 (c-shape phantom) and a prostate patient.
Results
MC simulations showed excellent agreement with measurements in the lateral depth-dose parameters and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) characteristics within a maximum relative error of 0.95 mm in range, 1.83% in entrance to peak ratio, 0.27% in mean point-to-point dose difference, and 0.32% in peak location. The mean relative absolute difference between MC simulations and measurements in terms of absorbed dose in the SOBP region was 0.93% ± 0.88%. Clinical phantom studies showed a good agreement compared to research TPS (relative error for TG-119 planning target volume PTV-D95 ∼ 1.8%; and for prostate PTV-D95 ∼ −0.6%).
Conclusion
We successfully developed a MC model for the pencil beam scanning system, which appears reliable for dose verification of the TPS in combination with QA information, prior to patient treatment.
{"title":"Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery","authors":"Ali Asadi , Azadeh Akhavanallaf , Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini , Naser Vosoughi , Habib Zaidi","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a versatile Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose calculation engine to support MC-based dose verification of treatment planning systems (TPSs) and quality assurance (QA) workflows in proton therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The GATE MC toolkit was used to simulate a fixed horizontal active scan-based proton beam delivery (SIEMENS IONTRIS). Within the nozzle, two primary and secondary dose monitors have been designed to enable the comparison of the accuracy of dose estimation from MC simulations with respect to physical QA measurements. The developed beam model was validated against a series of commissioning measurements using pinpoint chambers and 2D array ionization chambers (IC) in terms of lateral profiles and depth dose distributions. Furthermore, beam delivery module and treatment planning has been validated against the literature deploying various clinical test cases of the AAPM TG‐119 (c-shape phantom) and a prostate patient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MC simulations showed excellent agreement with measurements in the lateral depth-dose parameters and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) characteristics within a maximum relative error of 0.95 mm in range, 1.83% in entrance to peak ratio, 0.27% in mean point-to-point dose difference, and 0.32% in peak location. The mean relative absolute difference between MC simulations and measurements in terms of absorbed dose in the SOBP region was 0.93% ± 0.88%. Clinical phantom studies showed a good agreement compared to research TPS (relative error for TG-119 planning target volume PTV-D<sub>95</sub> ∼ 1.8%; and for prostate PTV-D<sub>95</sub> ∼ −0.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We successfully developed a MC model for the pencil beam scanning system, which appears reliable for dose verification of the TPS in combination with QA information, prior to patient treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 591-600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001027/pdfft?md5=ee47ca179f730456d33ac76196b166f2&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001027-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40705419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.002
Monika Clausen , Sirinya Ruangchan , Arame Sotoudegan , Andreas F. Resch , Barbara Knäusl , Hugo Palmans , Dietmar Georg
Purpose
To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy for small field proton irradiation relevant for pre-clinical in vivo studies using clinical infrastructure and technology. In this context additional beam collimation and range reduction was implemented.
Methods and materials
The clinical proton beam line employing pencil beam scanning (PBS) was adapted for the irradiation of small fields at shallow depths. Cylindrical collimators with apertures of 15, 12, 7 and 5 mm as well as two different range shifter types, placed at different distances relative to the target, were tested: a bolus range shifter (BRS) attached to the collimator and a clinical nozzle mounted range shifter (CRS) placed at a distance of 72 cm from the collimator. The Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation engine implemented in the clinical treatment planning system (TPS) was commissioned for these two additional hardware components. The study was conducted with a phantom and cylindrical target sizes between 2 and 25 mm in diameter following a dosimetric end-to-end test concept.
Results
The setup with the CRS provided a uniform dose distribution across the target. An agreement of better than 5% between the planned dose and the measurements was obtained for a target with 3 mm diameter (collimator 5 mm). A 2 mm difference between the collimator and the target diameter (target being 2 mm smaller than the collimator) sufficed to cover the whole target with the planned dose in the setup with CRS. Using the BRS setup (target 8 mm, collimator 12 mm) resulted in non-homogeneous dose distributions, with a dose discrepancy of up to 10% between the planned and measured doses.
Conclusion
The clinical proton infrastructure with adequate beam line adaptations and a state-of-the-art TPS based on MC dose calculations enables small animal irradiations with a high dosimetric precision and accuracy for target sizes down to 3 mm.
{"title":"Small field proton irradiation for in vivo studies: Potential and limitations when adapting clinical infrastructure","authors":"Monika Clausen , Sirinya Ruangchan , Arame Sotoudegan , Andreas F. Resch , Barbara Knäusl , Hugo Palmans , Dietmar Georg","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy for small field proton irradiation relevant for pre-clinical in vivo studies using clinical infrastructure and technology. In this context additional beam collimation and range reduction was implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>The clinical proton beam line employing pencil beam scanning (PBS) was adapted for the irradiation of small fields at shallow depths. Cylindrical collimators with apertures of 15, 12, 7 and 5<!--> <!-->mm as well as two different range shifter types, placed at different distances relative to the target, were tested: a bolus range shifter (BRS) attached to the collimator and a clinical nozzle mounted range shifter (CRS) placed at a distance of 72<!--> <!-->cm from the collimator. The Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation engine implemented in the clinical treatment planning system (TPS) was commissioned for these two additional hardware components. The study was conducted with a phantom and cylindrical target sizes between 2 and 25<!--> <!-->mm in diameter following a dosimetric end-to-end test concept.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The setup with the CRS provided a uniform dose distribution across the target. An agreement of better than<!--> <!-->5% between the planned dose and the measurements was obtained for a target with 3<!--> <!-->mm diameter (collimator 5<!--> <!-->mm). A 2<!--> <!-->mm difference between the collimator and the target diameter (target being 2 mm smaller than the collimator) sufficed to cover the whole target with the planned dose in the setup with CRS. Using the BRS setup (target 8<!--> <!-->mm, collimator 12<!--> <!-->mm) resulted in non-homogeneous dose distributions, with a dose discrepancy of up to 10% between the planned and measured doses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The clinical proton infrastructure with adequate beam line adaptations and a state-of-the-art TPS based on MC dose calculations enables small animal irradiations with a high dosimetric precision and accuracy for target sizes down to 3<!--> <!-->mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 542-551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000964/pdfft?md5=6a2d36ebbbded4eb6aae93b1b6f13bbe&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000964-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40675960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.002
Hans Lynggaard Riis , Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen , Nina Tilly , David Tilly
Purpose
The precision of the dose delivery in radiation therapy with high-field MR-linacs is challenging due to the substantial variation in the beam attenuation of the patient positioning system (PPS) (the couch and coils) as a function of the gantry angle. This work aimed to compare the attenuation of two PPSs located at two different MR-linac sites through measurements and calculations in the treatment planning system (TPS).
Methods
Attenuation measurements were performed at every 1° gantry angle at the two sites with a cylindrical water phantom with a Farmer chamber inserted along the rotational axis of the phantom. The phantom was positioned with the chamber reference point (CRP) at the MR-linac isocentre. A compensation strategy was applied to minimise sinusoidal measurement errors due to, e.g. air cavity or setup. A series of tests were performed to assess the sensitivity to measurement uncertainties. The dose to a model of the cylindrical water phantom with the PPS added was calculated in the TPS (Monaco v5.4 as well as in a development version Dev of an upcoming release), for the same gantry angles as for the measurements. The TPS PPS model dependency of the dose calculation voxelisation resolution was also investigated.
Results
A comparison of the measured attenuation of the two PPSs yielded differences of less than 0.5% for most gantry angles. The maximum deviation between the attenuation measurements for the two different PPSs exceeded ±1% at two specific gantry angles 115° and 245°, where the beam traverses the most complex PPS structures. The attenuation increases from 0% to 25% in 15° intervals around these angles. The measured and calculated attenuation, as calculated in v5.4, was generally within 1-2% with a systematic overestimation of the attenuation for gantry angles around 180°, as well as a maximum error of 4-5% for a few discrete angles in 10° gantry angle intervals around the complex PPS structures. The PPS modelling was improved compared to v5.4 in Dev, especially around 180°, and the results of those calculations were within ±1%, but with a similar 4% maximum deviation for the most complex PPS structures.
Conclusions
Generally, the two tested PPS structures exhibit very similar attenuation as a function of the gantry angle, including the angles with a steep change in attenuation. Both TPS versions, v5.4 and Dev delivered clinically acceptable accuracy of the calculated dose, as the differences in the measurements were overall better than ±2%. Additionally, Dev improved the accuracy of the dose calculation to ±1% for gantry angles around 180°.
{"title":"Dosimetric validation of the couch and coil model for high-field MR-linac treatment planning","authors":"Hans Lynggaard Riis , Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen , Nina Tilly , David Tilly","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The precision of the dose delivery in radiation therapy with high-field MR-linacs is challenging due to the substantial variation in the beam attenuation of the patient positioning system (PPS) (the couch and coils) as a function of the gantry angle. This work aimed to compare the attenuation of two PPSs located at two different MR-linac sites through measurements and calculations in the treatment planning system (TPS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Attenuation measurements were performed at every 1° gantry angle at the two sites with a cylindrical water phantom with a Farmer chamber inserted along the rotational axis of the phantom. The phantom was positioned with the chamber reference point (CRP) at the MR-linac isocentre. A compensation strategy was applied to minimise sinusoidal measurement errors due to, e.g. air cavity or setup. A series of tests were performed to assess the sensitivity to measurement uncertainties. The dose to a model of the cylindrical water phantom with the PPS added was calculated in the TPS (Monaco v5.4 as well as in a development version Dev of an upcoming release), for the same gantry angles as for the measurements. The TPS PPS model dependency of the dose calculation voxelisation resolution was also investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A comparison of the measured attenuation of the two PPSs yielded differences of less than 0.5% for most gantry angles. The maximum deviation between the attenuation measurements for the two different PPSs exceeded ±1% at two specific gantry angles 115° and 245°, where the beam traverses the most complex PPS structures. The attenuation increases from 0% to 25% in 15° intervals around these angles. The measured and calculated attenuation, as calculated in v5.4, was generally within 1-2% with a systematic overestimation of the attenuation for gantry angles around 180°, as well as a maximum error of 4-5% for a few discrete angles in 10° gantry angle intervals around the complex PPS structures. The PPS modelling was improved compared to v5.4 in Dev, especially around 180°, and the results of those calculations were within ±1%, but with a similar 4% maximum deviation for the most complex PPS structures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Generally, the two tested PPS structures exhibit very similar attenuation as a function of the gantry angle, including the angles with a steep change in attenuation. Both TPS versions, v5.4 and Dev delivered clinically acceptable accuracy of the calculated dose, as the differences in the measurements were overall better than ±2%. Additionally, Dev improved the accuracy of the dose calculation to ±1% for gantry angles around 180°.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 567-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923000107/pdfft?md5=b803cbed8da14be6fd6496a875e50cdc&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923000107-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9209877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.002
Mark E. Ladd
{"title":"The Medical Device Regulation and its impact on device development and research in Germany","authors":"Mark E. Ladd","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 459-461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923001149/pdfft?md5=2ec676734624e9c1443edac357f21c0f&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923001149-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49687314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011
Fabian Kugel , Jörg Wulff , Christian Bäumer , Martin Janson , Jana Kretschmer , Leonie Brodbek , Carina Behrends , Nico Verbeek , Hui Khee Looe , Björn Poppe , Beate Timmermann
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary fluence of a proton pencil beam exiting the accelerator is enveloped by a region of secondaries, commonly called “spray”. Although small in magnitude, this spray may affect dose distributions in pencil beam scanning mode e.g., in the calculation of the small field output, if not modelled properly in a treatment planning system (TPS). The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark the Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine of the RayStation TPS (v.10A) in small proton fields and systematically compare single Gaussian (SG) and double Gaussian (DG) modeling of initial proton fluence providing a more accurate representation of the nozzle spray.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The initial proton fluence distribution for SG/DG beam modeling was deduced from two-dimensional measurements in air with a scintillation screen with electronic readout. The DG model was either based on direct fits of the two Gaussians to the measured profiles, or by an iterative optimization procedure, which uses the measured profiles to mimic in-air scan-field factor (SF) measurements. To validate the DG beam models SFs, i.e. relative doses to a 10 × 10 cm<sup>2</sup> field, were measured in water for three different initial proton energies (<span><math><mrow><mn>100</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mn>160</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mn>226.7</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>) and square field sizes from <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> using a small field ionization chamber (IBA CC01) and an IBA ProteusPlus system (universal nozzle). Furthermore, the dose to the center of spherical target volumes (diameters: <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>) was determined using the same small volume ionization chamber (IC). A comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed, including estimates of influence factors typical for small field dosimetry deduced from a simple two-dimensional analytical model of the relative fluence distribution. Measurements were compared to the predictions of the RayStation TPS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SFs deviated by more than <span><math><mrow><mn>2</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> from TPS predictions in all fields <span><math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>4</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>4<
{"title":"Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine","authors":"Fabian Kugel , Jörg Wulff , Christian Bäumer , Martin Janson , Jana Kretschmer , Leonie Brodbek , Carina Behrends , Nico Verbeek , Hui Khee Looe , Björn Poppe , Beate Timmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary fluence of a proton pencil beam exiting the accelerator is enveloped by a region of secondaries, commonly called “spray”. Although small in magnitude, this spray may affect dose distributions in pencil beam scanning mode e.g., in the calculation of the small field output, if not modelled properly in a treatment planning system (TPS). The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark the Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine of the RayStation TPS (v.10A) in small proton fields and systematically compare single Gaussian (SG) and double Gaussian (DG) modeling of initial proton fluence providing a more accurate representation of the nozzle spray.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The initial proton fluence distribution for SG/DG beam modeling was deduced from two-dimensional measurements in air with a scintillation screen with electronic readout. The DG model was either based on direct fits of the two Gaussians to the measured profiles, or by an iterative optimization procedure, which uses the measured profiles to mimic in-air scan-field factor (SF) measurements. To validate the DG beam models SFs, i.e. relative doses to a 10 × 10 cm<sup>2</sup> field, were measured in water for three different initial proton energies (<span><math><mrow><mn>100</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mn>160</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mn>226.7</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>) and square field sizes from <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> using a small field ionization chamber (IBA CC01) and an IBA ProteusPlus system (universal nozzle). Furthermore, the dose to the center of spherical target volumes (diameters: <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>) was determined using the same small volume ionization chamber (IC). A comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed, including estimates of influence factors typical for small field dosimetry deduced from a simple two-dimensional analytical model of the relative fluence distribution. Measurements were compared to the predictions of the RayStation TPS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SFs deviated by more than <span><math><mrow><mn>2</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> from TPS predictions in all fields <span><math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>4</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>4<","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 529-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001325/pdfft?md5=acc41f4e71e3b623bcf07aca85ececd9&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001325-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10447935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.001
Xuanyu Zhu, Yang Gao, Feng Liu, Stuart Crozier, Hongfu Sun
Introduction
Background field removal (BFR) is a critical step required for successful quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). However, eliminating the background field in brains containing significant susceptibility sources, such as intracranial hemorrhages, is challenging due to the relatively large scale of the field induced by these pathological susceptibility sources.
Method
This study proposes a new deep learning-based method, BFRnet, to remove the background field in healthy and hemorrhagic subjects. The network is built with the dual-frequency octave convolutions on the U-net architecture, trained with synthetic field maps containing significant susceptibility sources. The BFRnet method is compared with three conventional BFR methods and one previous deep learning method using simulated and in vivo brains from 4 healthy and 2 hemorrhagic subjects. Robustness against acquisition field-of-view (FOV) orientation and brain masking are also investigated.
Results
For both simulation and in vivo experiments, BFRnet led to the best visually appealing results in the local field and QSM results with the minimum contrast loss and the most accurate hemorrhage susceptibility measurements among all five methods. In addition, BFRnet produced the most consistent local field and susceptibility maps between different sizes of brain masks, while conventional methods depend drastically on precise brain extraction and further brain edge erosions. It is also observed that BFRnet performed the best among all BFR methods for acquisition FOVs oblique to the main magnetic field.
Conclusion
The proposed BFRnet improved the accuracy of local field reconstruction in the hemorrhagic subjects compared with conventional BFR algorithms. The BFRnet method was effective for acquisitions of tilted orientations and retained whole brains without edge erosion as often required by traditional BFR methods.
{"title":"BFRnet: A deep learning-based MR background field removal method for QSM of the brain containing significant pathological susceptibility sources","authors":"Xuanyu Zhu, Yang Gao, Feng Liu, Stuart Crozier, Hongfu Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Background field removal (BFR) is a critical step required for successful quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). However, eliminating the background field in brains containing significant susceptibility sources, such as intracranial hemorrhages, is challenging due to the relatively large scale of the field induced by these pathological susceptibility sources.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This study proposes a new deep learning-based method, BFRnet, to remove the background field in healthy and hemorrhagic subjects. The network is built with the dual-frequency octave convolutions on the U-net architecture, trained with synthetic field maps containing significant susceptibility sources. The BFRnet method is compared with three conventional BFR methods and one previous deep learning method using simulated and <em>in vivo</em> brains from 4 healthy and 2 hemorrhagic subjects. Robustness against acquisition field-of-view (FOV) orientation and brain masking are also investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both simulation and <em>in vivo</em> experiments, BFRnet led to the best visually appealing results in the local field and QSM results with the minimum contrast loss and the most accurate hemorrhage susceptibility measurements among all five methods. In addition, BFRnet produced the most consistent local field and susceptibility maps between different sizes of brain masks, while conventional methods depend drastically on precise brain extraction and further brain edge erosions. It is also observed that BFRnet performed the best among all BFR methods for acquisition FOVs oblique to the main magnetic field.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The proposed BFRnet improved the accuracy of local field reconstruction in the hemorrhagic subjects compared with conventional BFR algorithms. The BFRnet method was effective for acquisitions of tilted orientations and retained whole brains without edge erosion as often required by traditional BFR methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 578-590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000873/pdfft?md5=a43396a30e379e50097e3a5a3e24b83c&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000873-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40351533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.005
Stefanie Kaser , Thomas Bergauer , Ander Biguri , Wolfgang Birkfellner , Sepideh Hatamikia , Albert Hirtl , Christian Irmler , Benjamin Kirchmayer , Felix Ulrich-Pur
Proton irradiation is a well-established method to treat deep-seated tumors in radio oncology. Usually, an X-ray computed tomography (CT) scan is used for treatment planning. Since proton therapy is based on the precise knowledge of the stopping power describing the energy loss of protons in the patient tissues, the Hounsfield units of the planning CT have to be converted. This conversion introduces range errors in the treatment plan, which could be reduced, if the stopping power values were extracted directly from an image obtained using protons instead of X-rays. Since protons are affected by multiple Coulomb scattering, reconstruction of the 3D stopping power map results in limited image quality if the curved proton path is not considered. This work presents a substantial code extension of the open-source toolbox TIGRE for proton CT (pCT) image reconstruction based on proton radiographs including a curved proton path estimate. The code extension and the reconstruction algorithms are GPU-based, allowing to achieve reconstruction results within minutes. The performance of the pCT code extension was tested with Monte Carlo simulated data using three phantoms (Catphan® high resolution and sensitometry modules and a CIRS patient phantom). In the simulations, ideal and non-ideal conditions for a pCT setup were assumed. The obtained mean absolute percentage error was found to be below 1% and up to 8 lp/cm could be resolved using an idealized setup. These findings demonstrate that the presented code extension to the TIGRE toolbox offers the possibility for other research groups to use a fast and accurate open-source pCT reconstruction.
{"title":"Extension of the open-source TIGRE toolbox for proton imaging","authors":"Stefanie Kaser , Thomas Bergauer , Ander Biguri , Wolfgang Birkfellner , Sepideh Hatamikia , Albert Hirtl , Christian Irmler , Benjamin Kirchmayer , Felix Ulrich-Pur","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proton irradiation is a well-established method to treat deep-seated tumors in radio oncology. Usually, an X-ray computed tomography (CT) scan is used for treatment planning. Since proton therapy is based on the precise knowledge of the stopping power describing the energy loss of protons in the patient tissues, the Hounsfield units of the planning CT have to be converted. This conversion introduces range errors in the treatment plan, which could be reduced, if the stopping power values were extracted directly from an image obtained using protons instead of X-rays. Since protons are affected by multiple Coulomb scattering, reconstruction of the 3D stopping power map results in limited image quality if the curved proton path is not considered. This work presents a substantial code extension of the open-source toolbox TIGRE for proton CT (pCT) image reconstruction based on proton radiographs including a curved proton path estimate. The code extension and the reconstruction algorithms are GPU-based, allowing to achieve reconstruction results within minutes. The performance of the pCT code extension was tested with Monte Carlo simulated data using three phantoms (Catphan® high resolution and sensitometry modules and a CIRS patient phantom). In the simulations, ideal and non-ideal conditions for a pCT setup were assumed. The obtained mean absolute percentage error was found to be below 1% and up to 8 lp/cm could be resolved using an idealized setup. These findings demonstrate that the presented code extension to the TIGRE toolbox offers the possibility for other research groups to use a fast and accurate open-source pCT reconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 552-566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000915/pdfft?md5=46269dbaf9848d6120a6ee0827c92f50&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000915-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33487328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}