首页 > 最新文献

Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik最新文献

英文 中文
Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik e.V. 德国医学物理学协会
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.10.006
Aus dem Vorstand
{"title":"Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik e.V.","authors":"Aus dem Vorstand","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.10.006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 620-629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923001228/pdfft?md5=9304bdc6e2b337a98d02b73720621824&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923001228-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SSRMP Recommendations No 9: Reference dosimetry in low and medium energy x-ray beams SSRMP 建议 9:中低能量 X 射线束的参考剂量测定
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.003
Maria M Aspradakis , Thierry Buchillier , Götz Kohler , Christian Kottler , Jérôme Krayenbühl

The SSRMP recommendations on reference dosimetry in kilovolt beams as used in radiation therapy were revised to establish current practice in Switzerland.

The recommendations specify the dosimetry formalism, reference class dosimeter systems and conditions used for the calibration of low and medium energy x-ray beams. Practical guidance is provided on the determination of the beam quality specifier and all corrections required for converting instrument readings to absorbed dose to water. Guidance is also provided on the determination of relative dose under non-reference conditions and on the cross calibration of instruments.

The effect of lack of electron equilibrium and influence of contaminant electrons when using thin window plane parallel chambers at x-ray tube potentials higher than 50 kV is elaborated in an appendix. In Switzerland the calibration of the reference system used for dosimetry is regulated by law. METAS and IRA are the authorities providing this calibration service to the radiotherapy departments. The last appendix of these recommendations summarise this calibration chain.

SSRMP 对放射治疗中使用的千伏光束参考剂量测定建议进行了修订,以确立瑞士的现行做法。该建议规定了剂量测定形式、参考类剂量计系统以及用于校准低能量和中等能量 X 射线光束的条件。该建议书提供了实用指南,指导如何确定光束质量规格,以及将仪器读数转换为水吸收剂量所需的所有修正。附录中详细阐述了在 X 射线管电位高于 50 千伏的情况下使用薄窗平面平行腔时缺乏电子平衡的影响和杂质电子的影响。在瑞士,用于剂量测定的参考系统的校准受法律约束。METAS 和 IRA 是为放射治疗部门提供校准服务的机构。本建议书的最后一个附录总结了这一校准链。
{"title":"SSRMP Recommendations No 9: Reference dosimetry in low and medium energy x-ray beams","authors":"Maria M Aspradakis ,&nbsp;Thierry Buchillier ,&nbsp;Götz Kohler ,&nbsp;Christian Kottler ,&nbsp;Jérôme Krayenbühl","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The SSRMP recommendations on reference dosimetry in kilovolt beams as used in radiation therapy were revised to establish current practice in Switzerland.</p><p>The recommendations specify the dosimetry formalism, reference class dosimeter systems and conditions used for the calibration of low and medium energy x-ray beams. Practical guidance is provided on the determination of the beam quality specifier and all corrections required for converting instrument readings to absorbed dose to water. Guidance is also provided on the determination of relative dose under non-reference conditions and on the cross calibration of instruments.</p><p>The effect of lack of electron equilibrium and influence of contaminant electrons when using thin window plane parallel chambers at x-ray tube potentials higher than 50<!--> <!-->kV is elaborated in an appendix. In Switzerland the calibration of the reference system used for dosimetry is regulated by law. METAS and IRA are the authorities providing this calibration service to the radiotherapy departments. The last appendix of these recommendations summarise this calibration chain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 601-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001362/pdfft?md5=7010f5938db47cdcfb3586cb6766ddc7&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001362-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9841666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Determination of the dose rate around a HDR 192Ir brachytherapy source with the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector 利用微型钻石和微型硅探测器测定高清 192Ir 近距离放射源周围的剂量率
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.07.004
Giulio Rossi , Thomas Failing , Mark Gainey , Michael Kollefrath , Frank Hensley , Klemens Zink , Dimos Baltas
<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To employ the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector (mDD and mSD, both PTW-Freiburg, Germany) to determine the dose rate around a HDR <sup>192</sup>Ir brachytherapy source (model mHDR-v2r, Elekta AB, Sweden).</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> The detectors were calibrated with a <sup>60</sup>Co beam at the PTW Calibration Laboratory. Measurements around the <sup>192</sup>Ir source were performed inside a PTW MP3 water phantom. The detectors were placed at selected points of measurement at radial distances <em>r</em>, ranging from 0.5 to 10 cm, keeping the polar angle <em>θ</em> = 90°. Additional measurements were performed with the mSD at fixed distances <em>r</em> = 1, 3 and 5 cm, with <em>θ</em> varying from 0 to 150°, 0 to 166°, and 0 to 168°, respectively. The corresponding mDD readings were already available from a previous work (Rossi et al., 2020). The beam quality correction factor of both detectors, as well as a phantom effect correction factor to account for the difference between the experimental geometry and that assumed in the TG-43 formalism, were determined using the Monte Carlo (MC) toolkit EGSnrc. The beam quality correction factor was factorized into energy dependence and volume-averaging correction factors. Using the abovementioned MC-based factors, the dose rate to water at the different points of measurement in TG-43 conditions was obtained from the measured readings, and was compared to the dose rate calculated according to the TG-43 formalism.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> The beam quality correction factor was considerably closer to unity for the mDD than for the mSD. The energy dependence of the mDD showed a very weak radial dependence, similar to the previous findings showing a weak angular dependence as well (Rossi et al., 2020). Conversely, the energy dependence of the mSD decreased significantly with increasing distances, and also showed a considerably more pronounced angular dependence, especially for the smallest angles. The volume-averaging showed a similar radial dependence for both detectors: the correction had a maximal impact at 0.5 cm and then approached unity for larger distances, as expected. Concerning the angular dependence, the correction for the mSD was also similar to the one previously determined for the mDD (Rossi et al., 2020): a maximal impact was observed at <em>θ</em> = 0°, with values tending to unity for larger angles. In general, the volume-averaging was less pronounced for the mSD due to the smaller sensitive volume radius. After the application of the MC-based factors, differences between mDD dose rate measurements and TG-43 dose rate calculations ranged from −2.6% to +4.3%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For the mSD, the differences ranged from −3.1% to +5.2%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For both detectors, all differences but one were within the combined uncertainty (<em>k</em> = 2). The differences of the mSD from the mD
目的:采用微钻石和微硅探测器(mDD 和 mSD,均为德国 PTW-Freiburg)确定 HDR 192Ir 近距离放射源(型号 mHDR-v2r,瑞典 Elekta AB)周围的剂量率:在 PTW 校准实验室用 60Co 射束对探测器进行了校准。192Ir 放射源周围的测量在 PTW MP3 水模型内进行。探测器被放置在选定的测量点上,径向距离 r 从 0.5 厘米到 10 厘米不等,保持极角 θ = 90°。在固定距离 r = 1、3 和 5 厘米处使用 mSD 进行了额外测量,θ 分别为 0 至 150°、0 至 166°、0 至 168°。相应的 mDD 读数可从以前的工作中获得(Rossi 等人,2020 年)。使用蒙特卡罗(MC)工具包 EGSnrc 确定了两个探测器的光束质量校正因子以及幻影效应校正因子,以考虑到实验几何形状与 TG-43 形式中假设的几何形状之间的差异。光束质量校正因子被分解为能量依赖校正因子和体积平均校正因子。利用上述基于 MC 的因子,从测量读数中获得了 TG-43 条件下不同测量点的水剂量率,并与根据 TG-43 形式主义计算的剂量率进行了比较:结果:与 mSD 相比,mDD 的光束质量校正因子更接近于统一。mDD 的能量依赖性显示出非常微弱的径向依赖性,这与之前显示出微弱角度依赖性的研究结果类似(Rossi 等人,2020 年)。相反,mSD 的能量依赖性随着距离的增加而显著降低,同时也显示出明显的角度依赖性,尤其是在最小角度时。两个探测器的体积平均值都显示出类似的径向依赖性:校正在 0.5 厘米处影响最大,然后如预期的那样,在更大的距离上接近于 1。关于角度依赖性,对 mSD 的校正也与之前为 mDD 确定的校正相似(Rossi 等人,2020 年):在 θ = 0° 时影响最大,角度越大,校正值越趋于统一。一般来说,由于敏感体积半径较小,mSD 的体积平均化不太明显。应用基于 MC 的因子后,mDD 剂量率测量值与 TG-43 剂量率计算值之间的差异从 -2.6% 到 +4.3%,绝对平均差异为 1.0%。对于 mSD,差异范围从 -3.1% 到 +5.2%,绝对平均差异为 1.0%。对于这两种探测器来说,除了一个之外,所有的差异都在综合不确定度(k = 2)范围之内。mSD 与 mDD 的差异从 -3.9% 到 +2.6%,绝大多数差异都在综合不确定度(k = 2)范围内。对于 θ ≠ 0°,即使不使用基于 MC 的光束质量校正因子,mDD 也能提供足够精确的结果,与 TG-43 剂量率计算结果的差异从 -1.9% 到 +3.4%,始终在综合不确定性(k = 2)范围内:mDD 和 mSD 显示出一致的结果,似乎非常适合测量 HDR 192Ir 近距离放射源周围的剂量率。需要对探测器的响应进行 MC 鉴定,以确定射束质量校正因子,并考虑能量依赖性和/或体积平均,尤其是对于 mSD。我们的研究结果支持使用 mDD 和 mSD 进行放射源质量保证、TPS 验证和 TG-43 参数确定。
{"title":"Determination of the dose rate around a HDR 192Ir brachytherapy source with the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector","authors":"Giulio Rossi ,&nbsp;Thomas Failing ,&nbsp;Mark Gainey ,&nbsp;Michael Kollefrath ,&nbsp;Frank Hensley ,&nbsp;Klemens Zink ,&nbsp;Dimos Baltas","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose:&lt;/strong&gt; To employ the microDiamond and the microSilicon detector (mDD and mSD, both PTW-Freiburg, Germany) to determine the dose rate around a HDR &lt;sup&gt;192&lt;/sup&gt;Ir brachytherapy source (model mHDR-v2r, Elekta AB, Sweden).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; The detectors were calibrated with a &lt;sup&gt;60&lt;/sup&gt;Co beam at the PTW Calibration Laboratory. Measurements around the &lt;sup&gt;192&lt;/sup&gt;Ir source were performed inside a PTW MP3 water phantom. The detectors were placed at selected points of measurement at radial distances &lt;em&gt;r&lt;/em&gt;, ranging from 0.5 to 10 cm, keeping the polar angle &lt;em&gt;θ&lt;/em&gt; = 90°. Additional measurements were performed with the mSD at fixed distances &lt;em&gt;r&lt;/em&gt; = 1, 3 and 5 cm, with &lt;em&gt;θ&lt;/em&gt; varying from 0 to 150°, 0 to 166°, and 0 to 168°, respectively. The corresponding mDD readings were already available from a previous work (Rossi et al., 2020). The beam quality correction factor of both detectors, as well as a phantom effect correction factor to account for the difference between the experimental geometry and that assumed in the TG-43 formalism, were determined using the Monte Carlo (MC) toolkit EGSnrc. The beam quality correction factor was factorized into energy dependence and volume-averaging correction factors. Using the abovementioned MC-based factors, the dose rate to water at the different points of measurement in TG-43 conditions was obtained from the measured readings, and was compared to the dose rate calculated according to the TG-43 formalism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; The beam quality correction factor was considerably closer to unity for the mDD than for the mSD. The energy dependence of the mDD showed a very weak radial dependence, similar to the previous findings showing a weak angular dependence as well (Rossi et al., 2020). Conversely, the energy dependence of the mSD decreased significantly with increasing distances, and also showed a considerably more pronounced angular dependence, especially for the smallest angles. The volume-averaging showed a similar radial dependence for both detectors: the correction had a maximal impact at 0.5 cm and then approached unity for larger distances, as expected. Concerning the angular dependence, the correction for the mSD was also similar to the one previously determined for the mDD (Rossi et al., 2020): a maximal impact was observed at &lt;em&gt;θ&lt;/em&gt; = 0°, with values tending to unity for larger angles. In general, the volume-averaging was less pronounced for the mSD due to the smaller sensitive volume radius. After the application of the MC-based factors, differences between mDD dose rate measurements and TG-43 dose rate calculations ranged from −2.6% to +4.3%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For the mSD, the differences ranged from −3.1% to +5.2%, with an absolute average difference of 1.0%. For both detectors, all differences but one were within the combined uncertainty (&lt;em&gt;k&lt;/em&gt; = 2). The differences of the mSD from the mD","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 463-478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000861/pdfft?md5=757a0dfeacd000a7b89d5837c4d2acf5&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000861-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33446157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery 开发和验证用于质子铅笔束扫描传输的最佳 GATE 模型
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008
Ali Asadi , Azadeh Akhavanallaf , Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini , Naser Vosoughi , Habib Zaidi

Objective

To develop and validate a versatile Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose calculation engine to support MC-based dose verification of treatment planning systems (TPSs) and quality assurance (QA) workflows in proton therapy.

Methods

The GATE MC toolkit was used to simulate a fixed horizontal active scan-based proton beam delivery (SIEMENS IONTRIS). Within the nozzle, two primary and secondary dose monitors have been designed to enable the comparison of the accuracy of dose estimation from MC simulations with respect to physical QA measurements. The developed beam model was validated against a series of commissioning measurements using pinpoint chambers and 2D array ionization chambers (IC) in terms of lateral profiles and depth dose distributions. Furthermore, beam delivery module and treatment planning has been validated against the literature deploying various clinical test cases of the AAPM TG‐119 (c-shape phantom) and a prostate patient.

Results

MC simulations showed excellent agreement with measurements in the lateral depth-dose parameters and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) characteristics within a maximum relative error of 0.95 mm in range, 1.83% in entrance to peak ratio, 0.27% in mean point-to-point dose difference, and 0.32% in peak location. The mean relative absolute difference between MC simulations and measurements in terms of absorbed dose in the SOBP region was 0.93% ± 0.88%. Clinical phantom studies showed a good agreement compared to research TPS (relative error for TG-119 planning target volume PTV-D95 ∼ 1.8%; and for prostate PTV-D95 ∼ −0.6%).

Conclusion

We successfully developed a MC model for the pencil beam scanning system, which appears reliable for dose verification of the TPS in combination with QA information, prior to patient treatment.

目的开发并验证基于蒙特卡罗(MC)的多功能剂量计算引擎,以支持质子治疗中基于MC的治疗计划系统(TPS)剂量验证和质量保证(QA)工作流程。方法使用GATE MC工具包模拟基于固定水平主动扫描的质子束输送(SIEMENS IONTRIS)。在喷嘴内,设计了两个主要和次要剂量监测器,以便比较 MC 模拟与物理 QA 测量的剂量估算准确性。利用针尖室和二维阵列电离室(IC)进行了一系列调试测量,从横向剖面和深度剂量分布方面对所开发的射束模型进行了验证。结果 MC 模拟结果显示,横向深度剂量参数和扩散布拉格峰(SOBP)特性与测量结果非常吻合,最大相对误差范围为 0.95 毫米,入口与峰值比为 1.83%,平均点对点剂量差为 0.27%,峰值位置为 0.32%。就 SOBP 区域的吸收剂量而言,MC 模拟与测量之间的平均相对绝对差值为 0.93% ± 0.88%。临床模型研究显示,与 TPS 研究相比,两者的一致性很好(TG-119 规划靶体积 PTV-D95 的相对误差 ∼ 1.8%;前列腺 PTV-D95 的相对误差 ∼ -0.6%)。
{"title":"Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery","authors":"Ali Asadi ,&nbsp;Azadeh Akhavanallaf ,&nbsp;Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini ,&nbsp;Naser Vosoughi ,&nbsp;Habib Zaidi","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop and validate a versatile Monte Carlo (MC)-based dose calculation engine to support MC-based dose verification of treatment planning systems (TPSs) and quality assurance (QA) workflows in proton therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The GATE MC toolkit was used to simulate a fixed horizontal active scan-based proton beam delivery (SIEMENS IONTRIS). Within the nozzle, two primary and secondary dose monitors have been designed to enable the comparison of the accuracy of dose estimation from MC simulations with respect to physical QA measurements. The developed beam model was validated against a series of commissioning measurements using pinpoint chambers and 2D array ionization chambers (IC) in terms of lateral profiles and depth dose distributions. Furthermore, beam delivery module and treatment planning has been validated against the literature deploying various clinical test cases of the AAPM TG‐119 (c-shape phantom) and a prostate patient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MC simulations showed excellent agreement with measurements in the lateral depth-dose parameters and spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) characteristics within a maximum relative error of 0.95 mm in range, 1.83% in entrance to peak ratio, 0.27% in mean point-to-point dose difference, and 0.32% in peak location. The mean relative absolute difference between MC simulations and measurements in terms of absorbed dose in the SOBP region was 0.93% ± 0.88%. Clinical phantom studies showed a good agreement compared to research TPS (relative error for TG-119 planning target volume PTV-D<sub>95</sub> ∼ 1.8%; and for prostate PTV-D<sub>95</sub> ∼ −0.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We successfully developed a MC model for the pencil beam scanning system, which appears reliable for dose verification of the TPS in combination with QA information, prior to patient treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 591-600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001027/pdfft?md5=ee47ca179f730456d33ac76196b166f2&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001027-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40705419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Small field proton irradiation for in vivo studies: Potential and limitations when adapting clinical infrastructure 用于体内研究的小场质子辐照:改造临床基础设施的潜力和局限性
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.002
Monika Clausen , Sirinya Ruangchan , Arame Sotoudegan , Andreas F. Resch , Barbara Knäusl , Hugo Palmans , Dietmar Georg

Purpose

To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy for small field proton irradiation relevant for pre-clinical in vivo studies using clinical infrastructure and technology. In this context additional beam collimation and range reduction was implemented.

Methods and materials

The clinical proton beam line employing pencil beam scanning (PBS) was adapted for the irradiation of small fields at shallow depths. Cylindrical collimators with apertures of 15, 12, 7 and 5 mm as well as two different range shifter types, placed at different distances relative to the target, were tested: a bolus range shifter (BRS) attached to the collimator and a clinical nozzle mounted range shifter (CRS) placed at a distance of 72 cm from the collimator. The Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation engine implemented in the clinical treatment planning system (TPS) was commissioned for these two additional hardware components. The study was conducted with a phantom and cylindrical target sizes between 2 and 25 mm in diameter following a dosimetric end-to-end test concept.

Results

The setup with the CRS provided a uniform dose distribution across the target. An agreement of better than 5% between the planned dose and the measurements was obtained for a target with 3 mm diameter (collimator 5 mm). A 2 mm difference between the collimator and the target diameter (target being 2 mm smaller than the collimator) sufficed to cover the whole target with the planned dose in the setup with CRS. Using the BRS setup (target 8 mm, collimator 12 mm) resulted in non-homogeneous dose distributions, with a dose discrepancy of up to 10% between the planned and measured doses.

Conclusion

The clinical proton infrastructure with adequate beam line adaptations and a state-of-the-art TPS based on MC dose calculations enables small animal irradiations with a high dosimetric precision and accuracy for target sizes down to 3 mm.

目的利用临床基础设施和技术,评估与临床前体内研究相关的小场质子辐照的剂量测定精度。方法和材料采用铅笔束扫描(PBS)的临床质子束线适用于浅层小场辐照。测试了孔径分别为 15、12、7 和 5 毫米的圆柱形准直器以及两种不同类型的射程移动器,它们与目标的相对距离各不相同:一种是与准直器相连的栓状射程移动器 (BRS),另一种是安装在临床喷嘴上的射程移动器 (CRS),与准直器的距离为 72 厘米。临床治疗计划系统(TPS)中基于蒙特卡罗(MC)的剂量计算引擎被用于这两个额外的硬件组件。研究使用了一个模型和直径在 2 毫米到 25 毫米之间的圆柱形靶,采用了端到端剂量测定测试概念。对于直径为 3 毫米的目标(准直器为 5 毫米),计划剂量与测量值的一致性优于 5%。准直器与靶直径相差 2 毫米(靶比准直器小 2 毫米),在使用 CRS 的设置中,计划剂量足以覆盖整个靶。结论临床质子基础设施具有足够的束流线适应性和基于 MC 剂量计算的最先进的 TPS,能够以高剂量测定精度和准确度对目标尺寸小至 3 毫米的小动物进行辐照。
{"title":"Small field proton irradiation for in vivo studies: Potential and limitations when adapting clinical infrastructure","authors":"Monika Clausen ,&nbsp;Sirinya Ruangchan ,&nbsp;Arame Sotoudegan ,&nbsp;Andreas F. Resch ,&nbsp;Barbara Knäusl ,&nbsp;Hugo Palmans ,&nbsp;Dietmar Georg","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the dosimetric accuracy for small field proton irradiation relevant for pre-clinical in vivo studies using clinical infrastructure and technology. In this context additional beam collimation and range reduction was implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>The clinical proton beam line employing pencil beam scanning (PBS) was adapted for the irradiation of small fields at shallow depths. Cylindrical collimators with apertures of 15, 12, 7 and 5<!--> <!-->mm as well as two different range shifter types, placed at different distances relative to the target, were tested: a bolus range shifter (BRS) attached to the collimator and a clinical nozzle mounted range shifter (CRS) placed at a distance of 72<!--> <!-->cm from the collimator. The Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation engine implemented in the clinical treatment planning system (TPS) was commissioned for these two additional hardware components. The study was conducted with a phantom and cylindrical target sizes between 2 and 25<!--> <!-->mm in diameter following a dosimetric end-to-end test concept.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The setup with the CRS provided a uniform dose distribution across the target. An agreement of better than<!--> <!-->5% between the planned dose and the measurements was obtained for a target with 3<!--> <!-->mm diameter (collimator 5<!--> <!-->mm). A 2<!--> <!-->mm difference between the collimator and the target diameter (target being 2 mm smaller than the collimator) sufficed to cover the whole target with the planned dose in the setup with CRS. Using the BRS setup (target 8<!--> <!-->mm, collimator 12<!--> <!-->mm) resulted in non-homogeneous dose distributions, with a dose discrepancy of up to 10% between the planned and measured doses.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The clinical proton infrastructure with adequate beam line adaptations and a state-of-the-art TPS based on MC dose calculations enables small animal irradiations with a high dosimetric precision and accuracy for target sizes down to 3<!--> <!-->mm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 542-551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000964/pdfft?md5=6a2d36ebbbded4eb6aae93b1b6f13bbe&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000964-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40675960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Dosimetric validation of the couch and coil model for high-field MR-linac treatment planning 用于高场磁共振线性治疗规划的床和线圈模型的剂量学验证
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.002
Hans Lynggaard Riis , Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen , Nina Tilly , David Tilly

Purpose

The precision of the dose delivery in radiation therapy with high-field MR-linacs is challenging due to the substantial variation in the beam attenuation of the patient positioning system (PPS) (the couch and coils) as a function of the gantry angle. This work aimed to compare the attenuation of two PPSs located at two different MR-linac sites through measurements and calculations in the treatment planning system (TPS).

Methods

Attenuation measurements were performed at every 1° gantry angle at the two sites with a cylindrical water phantom with a Farmer chamber inserted along the rotational axis of the phantom. The phantom was positioned with the chamber reference point (CRP) at the MR-linac isocentre. A compensation strategy was applied to minimise sinusoidal measurement errors due to, e.g. air cavity or setup. A series of tests were performed to assess the sensitivity to measurement uncertainties. The dose to a model of the cylindrical water phantom with the PPS added was calculated in the TPS (Monaco v5.4 as well as in a development version Dev of an upcoming release), for the same gantry angles as for the measurements. The TPS PPS model dependency of the dose calculation voxelisation resolution was also investigated.

Results

A comparison of the measured attenuation of the two PPSs yielded differences of less than 0.5% for most gantry angles. The maximum deviation between the attenuation measurements for the two different PPSs exceeded ±1% at two specific gantry angles 115° and 245°, where the beam traverses the most complex PPS structures. The attenuation increases from 0% to 25% in 15° intervals around these angles. The measured and calculated attenuation, as calculated in v5.4, was generally within 1-2% with a systematic overestimation of the attenuation for gantry angles around 180°, as well as a maximum error of 4-5% for a few discrete angles in 10° gantry angle intervals around the complex PPS structures. The PPS modelling was improved compared to v5.4 in Dev, especially around 180°, and the results of those calculations were within ±1%, but with a similar 4% maximum deviation for the most complex PPS structures.

Conclusions

Generally, the two tested PPS structures exhibit very similar attenuation as a function of the gantry angle, including the angles with a steep change in attenuation. Both TPS versions, v5.4 and Dev delivered clinically acceptable accuracy of the calculated dose, as the differences in the measurements were overall better than ±2%. Additionally, Dev improved the accuracy of the dose calculation to ±1% for gantry angles around 180°.

目的由于患者定位系统(PPS)(治疗床和线圈)的射束衰减随龙门架角度的变化而有很大差异,因此在使用高场磁共振线性加速器进行放射治疗时,剂量投放的精确性具有挑战性。这项工作的目的是通过在治疗计划系统(TPS)中进行测量和计算,比较位于两个不同磁共振线阵部位的两个 PPS 的衰减情况。方法在两个部位每隔 1° 的龙门角度用一个圆柱形水模型进行衰减测量,模型中沿旋转轴插入一个 Farmer 腔。模型的定位是将腔体参考点(CRP)置于磁共振成像仪的等中心。采用了补偿策略,以尽量减少由于气腔或设置等原因造成的正弦测量误差。为评估对测量不确定性的敏感性,进行了一系列测试。在 TPS(Monaco v5.4,以及即将发布的开发版本 Dev)中计算了添加了 PPS 的圆柱形水体模型的剂量,龙门角度与测量时相同。结果比较两种 PPS 的测量衰减结果发现,在大多数龙门角度下,两者之间的差异小于 0.5%。在两个特定的龙门角度 115° 和 245°,两种不同 PPS 的衰减测量值之间的最大偏差超过 ±1%,在这两个角度,光束穿过最复杂的 PPS 结构。在这两个角度周围,衰减以 15° 的间隔从 0% 增加到 25%。在 v5.4 中计算的测量和计算衰减一般在 1-2% 的范围内,180° 左右的龙门角度的衰减被系统性高估,而在复杂 PPS 结构周围 10°龙门角度间隔内的几个离散角度的最大误差为 4-5%。与 Dev5.4 版相比,PPS 建模有所改进,尤其是在 180° 附近,计算结果在 ±1% 以内,但对于最复杂的 PPS 结构,最大偏差也同样为 4%。两个 TPS 版本(v5.4 和 Dev)都能提供临床上可接受的计算剂量精度,因为测量结果的差异总体上小于 ±2%。此外,Dev 将 180° 左右龙门角度的剂量计算精度提高到 ±1%。
{"title":"Dosimetric validation of the couch and coil model for high-field MR-linac treatment planning","authors":"Hans Lynggaard Riis ,&nbsp;Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen ,&nbsp;Nina Tilly ,&nbsp;David Tilly","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The precision of the dose delivery in radiation therapy with high-field MR-linacs is challenging due to the substantial variation in the beam attenuation of the patient positioning system (PPS) (the couch and coils) as a function of the gantry angle. This work aimed to compare the attenuation of two PPSs located at two different MR-linac sites through measurements and calculations in the treatment planning system (TPS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Attenuation measurements were performed at every 1° gantry angle at the two sites with a cylindrical water phantom with a Farmer chamber inserted along the rotational axis of the phantom. The phantom was positioned with the chamber reference point (CRP) at the MR-linac isocentre. A compensation strategy was applied to minimise sinusoidal measurement errors due to, e.g. air cavity or setup. A series of tests were performed to assess the sensitivity to measurement uncertainties. The dose to a model of the cylindrical water phantom with the PPS added was calculated in the TPS (Monaco v5.4 as well as in a development version Dev of an upcoming release), for the same gantry angles as for the measurements. The TPS PPS model dependency of the dose calculation voxelisation resolution was also investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A comparison of the measured attenuation of the two PPSs yielded differences of less than 0.5% for most gantry angles. The maximum deviation between the attenuation measurements for the two different PPSs exceeded ±1% at two specific gantry angles 115° and 245°, where the beam traverses the most complex PPS structures. The attenuation increases from 0% to 25% in 15° intervals around these angles. The measured and calculated attenuation, as calculated in v5.4, was generally within 1-2% with a systematic overestimation of the attenuation for gantry angles around 180°, as well as a maximum error of 4-5% for a few discrete angles in 10° gantry angle intervals around the complex PPS structures. The PPS modelling was improved compared to v5.4 in Dev, especially around 180°, and the results of those calculations were within ±1%, but with a similar 4% maximum deviation for the most complex PPS structures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Generally, the two tested PPS structures exhibit very similar attenuation as a function of the gantry angle, including the angles with a steep change in attenuation. Both TPS versions, v5.4 and Dev delivered clinically acceptable accuracy of the calculated dose, as the differences in the measurements were overall better than ±2%. Additionally, Dev improved the accuracy of the dose calculation to ±1% for gantry angles around 180°.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 567-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923000107/pdfft?md5=b803cbed8da14be6fd6496a875e50cdc&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923000107-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9209877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Medical Device Regulation and its impact on device development and research in Germany 《医疗器械条例》及其对德国器械研发的影响。
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.002
Mark E. Ladd
{"title":"The Medical Device Regulation and its impact on device development and research in Germany","authors":"Mark E. Ladd","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.09.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 459-461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388923001149/pdfft?md5=2ec676734624e9c1443edac357f21c0f&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388923001149-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49687314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine 在商用蒙特卡洛剂量计算引擎中验证小质子场的双高斯源模型
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011
Fabian Kugel , Jörg Wulff , Christian Bäumer , Martin Janson , Jana Kretschmer , Leonie Brodbek , Carina Behrends , Nico Verbeek , Hui Khee Looe , Björn Poppe , Beate Timmermann
<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The primary fluence of a proton pencil beam exiting the accelerator is enveloped by a region of secondaries, commonly called “spray”. Although small in magnitude, this spray may affect dose distributions in pencil beam scanning mode e.g., in the calculation of the small field output, if not modelled properly in a treatment planning system (TPS). The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark the Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine of the RayStation TPS (v.10A) in small proton fields and systematically compare single Gaussian (SG) and double Gaussian (DG) modeling of initial proton fluence providing a more accurate representation of the nozzle spray.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The initial proton fluence distribution for SG/DG beam modeling was deduced from two-dimensional measurements in air with a scintillation screen with electronic readout. The DG model was either based on direct fits of the two Gaussians to the measured profiles, or by an iterative optimization procedure, which uses the measured profiles to mimic in-air scan-field factor (SF) measurements. To validate the DG beam models SFs, i.e. relative doses to a 10 × 10 cm<sup>2</sup> field, were measured in water for three different initial proton energies (<span><math><mrow><mn>100</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mn>160</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>, <span><math><mrow><mn>226.7</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>M</mi><mi>e</mi><mi>V</mi></mrow></math></span>) and square field sizes from <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><msup><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup></mrow></math></span> using a small field ionization chamber (IBA CC01) and an IBA ProteusPlus system (universal nozzle). Furthermore, the dose to the center of spherical target volumes (diameters: <span><math><mrow><mn>1</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mn>10</mn><mspace></mspace><mspace></mspace><mi>c</mi><mi>m</mi></mrow></math></span>) was determined using the same small volume ionization chamber (IC). A comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed, including estimates of influence factors typical for small field dosimetry deduced from a simple two-dimensional analytical model of the relative fluence distribution. Measurements were compared to the predictions of the RayStation TPS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SFs deviated by more than <span><math><mrow><mn>2</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> from TPS predictions in all fields <span><math><mrow><mo><</mo><mn>4</mn><mspace></mspace><mo>×</mo><mn>4<
目的质子铅笔束从加速器中流出时,会被一个通常称为 "喷雾 "的二次束区域所包围。虽然喷射量很小,但如果治疗计划系统(TPS)建模不当,可能会影响铅笔束扫描模式下的剂量分布,例如在计算小场输出时。本研究的目的是对 RayStation TPS(v.10A)在小质子场中的蒙特卡罗(MC)剂量引擎进行剂量测定基准测试,并系统比较初始质子通量的单高斯(SG)和双高斯(DG)建模,以更准确地表示喷嘴喷雾。DG 模型要么基于两个高斯与测量剖面的直接拟合,要么基于迭代优化程序,该程序使用测量剖面来模拟空气中的扫描场因子(SF)测量。为了验证 DG 射束模型的 SFs,即 10 × 10 cm2 场的相对剂量,使用小场电离室(IBA CC01)和 IBA ProteusPlus 系统(通用喷嘴)在水中测量了三种不同的初始质子能量(100MeV、160MeV、226.7MeV)和 1×1 cm2 到 10×10 cm2 的正方形场。此外,还使用相同的小体积电离室(IC)测定了球形靶体积(直径:1 厘米至 10 厘米)中心的剂量。进行了全面的不确定性分析,包括根据相对通量分布的简单二维分析模型推导出的小场剂量测定典型影响因素的估计值。测量结果与 RayStation TPS 的预测结果进行了比较。结果在所有 4×4 平方厘米的场中,SF 与 TPS 预测结果的偏差都超过了 2%,SG 模型的最大偏差为 5.8%。相比之下,使用直接拟合的 DG 模型时,所有场大小和质子能量的偏差都小于 2%。优化后的 DG 模型除了在 1×1 平方厘米扫描场中偏差稍大外,其他表现类似。不确定性估计显示,铅笔束尺寸变化(±5%)的影响很大,导致高达 5.0% 的标准不确定性。在球形辐照体积内的点剂量,SG 模型与计算结果的偏差高达 3.3%,而 DG 模型则为 2.0%。全面的不确定性分析表明,此类测量的综合标准不确定性也有类似程度的偏差。
{"title":"Validating a double Gaussian source model for small proton fields in a commercial Monte-Carlo dose calculation engine","authors":"Fabian Kugel ,&nbsp;Jörg Wulff ,&nbsp;Christian Bäumer ,&nbsp;Martin Janson ,&nbsp;Jana Kretschmer ,&nbsp;Leonie Brodbek ,&nbsp;Carina Behrends ,&nbsp;Nico Verbeek ,&nbsp;Hui Khee Looe ,&nbsp;Björn Poppe ,&nbsp;Beate Timmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.011","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Purpose&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The primary fluence of a proton pencil beam exiting the accelerator is enveloped by a region of secondaries, commonly called “spray”. Although small in magnitude, this spray may affect dose distributions in pencil beam scanning mode e.g., in the calculation of the small field output, if not modelled properly in a treatment planning system (TPS). The purpose of this study was to dosimetrically benchmark the Monte Carlo (MC) dose engine of the RayStation TPS (v.10A) in small proton fields and systematically compare single Gaussian (SG) and double Gaussian (DG) modeling of initial proton fluence providing a more accurate representation of the nozzle spray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The initial proton fluence distribution for SG/DG beam modeling was deduced from two-dimensional measurements in air with a scintillation screen with electronic readout. The DG model was either based on direct fits of the two Gaussians to the measured profiles, or by an iterative optimization procedure, which uses the measured profiles to mimic in-air scan-field factor (SF) measurements. To validate the DG beam models SFs, i.e. relative doses to a 10 × 10 cm&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; field, were measured in water for three different initial proton energies (&lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;100&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mi&gt;M&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;e&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;V&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;160&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mi&gt;M&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;e&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;V&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;226.7&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mi&gt;M&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;e&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;V&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) and square field sizes from &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mo&gt;×&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;msup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;c&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;m&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; to &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;10&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mo&gt;×&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;10&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;msup&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mi&gt;c&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;m&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;/msup&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; using a small field ionization chamber (IBA CC01) and an IBA ProteusPlus system (universal nozzle). Furthermore, the dose to the center of spherical target volumes (diameters: &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;1&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mi&gt;c&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;m&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; to &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;10&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mi&gt;c&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;m&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt;) was determined using the same small volume ionization chamber (IC). A comprehensive uncertainty analysis was performed, including estimates of influence factors typical for small field dosimetry deduced from a simple two-dimensional analytical model of the relative fluence distribution. Measurements were compared to the predictions of the RayStation TPS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;SFs deviated by more than &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mn&gt;2&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mo&gt;%&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;/mrow&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; from TPS predictions in all fields &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mrow&gt;&lt;mo&gt;&lt;&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;4&lt;/mn&gt;&lt;mspace&gt;&lt;/mspace&gt;&lt;mo&gt;×&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mn&gt;4&lt;","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 529-541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001325/pdfft?md5=acc41f4e71e3b623bcf07aca85ececd9&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001325-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10447935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
BFRnet: A deep learning-based MR background field removal method for QSM of the brain containing significant pathological susceptibility sources BFRnet:一种基于深度学习的磁共振背景场去除方法,用于含有重要病理易感源的大脑 QSM
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.001
Xuanyu Zhu, Yang Gao, Feng Liu, Stuart Crozier, Hongfu Sun

Introduction

Background field removal (BFR) is a critical step required for successful quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). However, eliminating the background field in brains containing significant susceptibility sources, such as intracranial hemorrhages, is challenging due to the relatively large scale of the field induced by these pathological susceptibility sources.

Method

This study proposes a new deep learning-based method, BFRnet, to remove the background field in healthy and hemorrhagic subjects. The network is built with the dual-frequency octave convolutions on the U-net architecture, trained with synthetic field maps containing significant susceptibility sources. The BFRnet method is compared with three conventional BFR methods and one previous deep learning method using simulated and in vivo brains from 4 healthy and 2 hemorrhagic subjects. Robustness against acquisition field-of-view (FOV) orientation and brain masking are also investigated.

Results

For both simulation and in vivo experiments, BFRnet led to the best visually appealing results in the local field and QSM results with the minimum contrast loss and the most accurate hemorrhage susceptibility measurements among all five methods. In addition, BFRnet produced the most consistent local field and susceptibility maps between different sizes of brain masks, while conventional methods depend drastically on precise brain extraction and further brain edge erosions. It is also observed that BFRnet performed the best among all BFR methods for acquisition FOVs oblique to the main magnetic field.

Conclusion

The proposed BFRnet improved the accuracy of local field reconstruction in the hemorrhagic subjects compared with conventional BFR algorithms. The BFRnet method was effective for acquisitions of tilted orientations and retained whole brains without edge erosion as often required by traditional BFR methods.

引言 背景场去除(BFR)是成功进行定量易感测绘(QSM)的关键步骤。本研究提出了一种基于深度学习的新方法--BFRnet,用于去除健康和出血受试者的背景场。该网络是在 U-net 架构上使用双频倍频卷积构建的,并使用包含重要易感源的合成场图进行训练。利用 4 名健康受试者和 2 名出血性受试者的模拟大脑和活体大脑,将 BFRnet 方法与三种传统 BFR 方法和之前的一种深度学习方法进行了比较。结果在模拟和活体实验中,在所有五种方法中,BFRnet 得出的局部场和 QSM 结果视觉效果最好,对比度损失最小,出血感度测量最准确。此外,BFRnet 在不同大小的脑掩膜之间生成的局部场和电感图最为一致,而传统方法则严重依赖于精确的脑提取和进一步的脑边缘侵蚀。结论与传统的 BFR 算法相比,提出的 BFRnet 提高了出血受试者局部磁场重建的准确性。BFRnet 方法对倾斜方向的采集非常有效,并且保留了整个大脑,没有传统 BFR 方法通常要求的边缘侵蚀。
{"title":"BFRnet: A deep learning-based MR background field removal method for QSM of the brain containing significant pathological susceptibility sources","authors":"Xuanyu Zhu,&nbsp;Yang Gao,&nbsp;Feng Liu,&nbsp;Stuart Crozier,&nbsp;Hongfu Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Background field removal (BFR) is a critical step required for successful quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). However, eliminating the background field in brains containing significant susceptibility sources, such as intracranial hemorrhages, is challenging due to the relatively large scale of the field induced by these pathological susceptibility sources.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This study proposes a new deep learning-based method, BFRnet, to remove the background field in healthy and hemorrhagic subjects. The network is built with the dual-frequency octave convolutions on the U-net architecture, trained with synthetic field maps containing significant susceptibility sources. The BFRnet method is compared with three conventional BFR methods and one previous deep learning method using simulated and <em>in vivo</em> brains from 4 healthy and 2 hemorrhagic subjects. Robustness against acquisition field-of-view (FOV) orientation and brain masking are also investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both simulation and <em>in vivo</em> experiments, BFRnet led to the best visually appealing results in the local field and QSM results with the minimum contrast loss and the most accurate hemorrhage susceptibility measurements among all five methods. In addition, BFRnet produced the most consistent local field and susceptibility maps between different sizes of brain masks, while conventional methods depend drastically on precise brain extraction and further brain edge erosions. It is also observed that BFRnet performed the best among all BFR methods for acquisition FOVs oblique to the main magnetic field.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The proposed BFRnet improved the accuracy of local field reconstruction in the hemorrhagic subjects compared with conventional BFR algorithms. The BFRnet method was effective for acquisitions of tilted orientations and retained whole brains without edge erosion as often required by traditional BFR methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 578-590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000873/pdfft?md5=a43396a30e379e50097e3a5a3e24b83c&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000873-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40351533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Extension of the open-source TIGRE toolbox for proton imaging 为质子成像扩展开源 TIGRE 工具箱
IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.005
Stefanie Kaser , Thomas Bergauer , Ander Biguri , Wolfgang Birkfellner , Sepideh Hatamikia , Albert Hirtl , Christian Irmler , Benjamin Kirchmayer , Felix Ulrich-Pur

Proton irradiation is a well-established method to treat deep-seated tumors in radio oncology. Usually, an X-ray computed tomography (CT) scan is used for treatment planning. Since proton therapy is based on the precise knowledge of the stopping power describing the energy loss of protons in the patient tissues, the Hounsfield units of the planning CT have to be converted. This conversion introduces range errors in the treatment plan, which could be reduced, if the stopping power values were extracted directly from an image obtained using protons instead of X-rays. Since protons are affected by multiple Coulomb scattering, reconstruction of the 3D stopping power map results in limited image quality if the curved proton path is not considered. This work presents a substantial code extension of the open-source toolbox TIGRE for proton CT (pCT) image reconstruction based on proton radiographs including a curved proton path estimate. The code extension and the reconstruction algorithms are GPU-based, allowing to achieve reconstruction results within minutes. The performance of the pCT code extension was tested with Monte Carlo simulated data using three phantoms (Catphan® high resolution and sensitometry modules and a CIRS patient phantom). In the simulations, ideal and non-ideal conditions for a pCT setup were assumed. The obtained mean absolute percentage error was found to be below 1% and up to 8 lp/cm could be resolved using an idealized setup. These findings demonstrate that the presented code extension to the TIGRE toolbox offers the possibility for other research groups to use a fast and accurate open-source pCT reconstruction.

质子照射是放射肿瘤学中治疗深部肿瘤的一种行之有效的方法。通常使用 X 射线计算机断层扫描(CT)来制定治疗计划。由于质子治疗是基于描述质子在患者组织中能量损耗的停止功率的精确知识,因此必须对计划 CT 的 Hounsfield 单位进行转换。如果直接从使用质子而不是 X 射线获得的图像中提取停止功率值,就可以减少治疗计划中的范围误差。由于质子受到多重库仑散射的影响,如果不考虑质子的弯曲路径,重建三维停止功率图会导致图像质量受限。本研究对开源工具箱 TIGRE 进行了大量代码扩展,用于基于质子射线照片的质子 CT(pCT)图像重建,包括弯曲质子路径估计。代码扩展和重建算法基于 GPU,可在几分钟内获得重建结果。使用三个模型(Catphan® 高分辨率和敏感度测量模块以及 CIRS 患者模型)的蒙特卡罗模拟数据对 pCT 代码扩展的性能进行了测试。在模拟中,假定了 pCT 设置的理想和非理想条件。结果发现,获得的平均绝对百分比误差低于 1%,使用理想化设置可分辨出高达 8 lp/cm。这些发现表明,TIGRE 工具箱的代码扩展为其他研究小组提供了使用快速、准确的开源 pCT 重建的可能性。
{"title":"Extension of the open-source TIGRE toolbox for proton imaging","authors":"Stefanie Kaser ,&nbsp;Thomas Bergauer ,&nbsp;Ander Biguri ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Birkfellner ,&nbsp;Sepideh Hatamikia ,&nbsp;Albert Hirtl ,&nbsp;Christian Irmler ,&nbsp;Benjamin Kirchmayer ,&nbsp;Felix Ulrich-Pur","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proton irradiation is a well-established method to treat deep-seated tumors in radio oncology. Usually, an X-ray computed tomography (CT) scan is used for treatment planning. Since proton therapy is based on the precise knowledge of the stopping power describing the energy loss of protons in the patient tissues, the Hounsfield units of the planning CT have to be converted. This conversion introduces range errors in the treatment plan, which could be reduced, if the stopping power values were extracted directly from an image obtained using protons instead of X-rays. Since protons are affected by multiple Coulomb scattering, reconstruction of the 3D stopping power map results in limited image quality if the curved proton path is not considered. This work presents a substantial code extension of the open-source toolbox TIGRE for proton CT (pCT) image reconstruction based on proton radiographs including a curved proton path estimate. The code extension and the reconstruction algorithms are GPU-based, allowing to achieve reconstruction results within minutes. The performance of the pCT code extension was tested with Monte Carlo simulated data using three phantoms (Catphan® high resolution and sensitometry modules and a CIRS patient phantom). In the simulations, ideal and non-ideal conditions for a pCT setup were assumed. The obtained mean absolute percentage error was found to be below 1% and up to 8 lp/cm could be resolved using an idealized setup. These findings demonstrate that the presented code extension to the TIGRE toolbox offers the possibility for other research groups to use a fast and accurate open-source pCT reconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"33 4","pages":"Pages 552-566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000915/pdfft?md5=46269dbaf9848d6120a6ee0827c92f50&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922000915-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33487328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1