首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Geodesy最新文献

英文 中文
Multi-epoch PPP-RTK corrections: temporal characteristics, pitfalls and user-impact 多波器 PPP-RTK 校正:时间特性、陷阱和对用户的影响
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-024-01823-8

Abstract

PPP-RTK corrections, aiding GNSS users to achieve single-receiver integer ambiguity-resolved parameter solutions, are often estimated in a recursive manner by a provider. Such recursive, multi-epoch, estimation of the corrections relies on a set of (mathcal {S}) -basis parameters that are chosen by the provider so as to make the underlying measurement setup solvable. As a consequence, the provider can only estimate estimable forms of the corrections rather than the original corrections themselves. It is the goal of the present contribution to address the consequence of the corrections’ dependency on the provider’s (mathcal {S}) -basis, showcasing the characteristics of their multi-epoch solutions, thereby identifying potential pitfalls which the PPP-RTK user should avoid when evaluating such solutions. To this end, we develop a simulation platform that allows one to have full control over the properties of PPP-RTK corrections and demonstrate various misleading temporal behaviors that exist when interpreting the multi-epoch solutions of their estimable forms. The roles of the correction latency and time correlation in the multi-epoch user positioning performance are quantified, while the deviation of the user-reported positioning precision description from its user-actual counterpart is measured under a misspecified user stochastic model.

摘要 PPP-RTK校正帮助全球导航卫星系统用户实现单接收器整数含混解参数解,通常由提供商以递归方式估算。这种修正的递归、多探头估算依赖于一组基础参数,这些参数由提供商选择,以便使基础测量设置可求解。因此,提供者只能估计修正的可估计形式,而不是原始修正本身。本论文的目标是解决修正依赖于提供者的(mathcal {S})基础的后果,展示其多时序解决方案的特征,从而识别 PPP-RTK 用户在评估此类解决方案时应避免的潜在陷阱。为此,我们开发了一个仿真平台,允许人们完全控制 PPP-RTK 修正的特性,并演示了在解释其可估算形式的多波段解时存在的各种误导性时间行为。我们量化了校正延迟和时间相关性在多波段用户定位性能中的作用,同时测量了用户报告的定位精度描述与用户实际描述之间的偏差。
{"title":"Multi-epoch PPP-RTK corrections: temporal characteristics, pitfalls and user-impact","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01823-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01823-8","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>PPP-RTK corrections, aiding GNSS users to achieve single-receiver integer ambiguity-resolved parameter solutions, are often estimated in a recursive manner by a provider. Such recursive, multi-epoch, estimation of the corrections relies on a set of <span> <span>(mathcal {S})</span> </span>-basis parameters that are chosen by the provider so as to make the underlying measurement setup solvable. As a consequence, the provider can only estimate <em>estimable</em> forms of the corrections rather than the original corrections themselves. It is the goal of the present contribution to address the consequence of the corrections’ dependency on the provider’s <span> <span>(mathcal {S})</span> </span>-basis, showcasing the characteristics of their multi-epoch solutions, thereby identifying potential pitfalls which the PPP-RTK user should avoid when evaluating such solutions. To this end, we develop a simulation platform that allows one to have full control over the properties of PPP-RTK corrections and demonstrate various misleading temporal behaviors that exist when interpreting the multi-epoch solutions of their estimable forms. The roles of the correction latency and time correlation in the multi-epoch user positioning performance are quantified, while the deviation of the user-reported positioning precision description from its user-actual counterpart is measured under a misspecified user stochastic model.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139909012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IAG Newsletter 国际咨询组通讯
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-024-01825-6
Gyula Tóth
{"title":"IAG Newsletter","authors":"Gyula Tóth","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01825-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01825-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140886925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A novel ionospheric TEC mapping function with azimuth parameters and its application to the Chinese region 带方位角参数的新型电离层 TEC 映射函数及其在中国地区的应用
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01819-w
Xingliang Huo, Yuanliang Long, Haojie Liu, Yunbin Yuan, Qi Liu, Ying Li, Mingming Liu, Yanwen Liu, Weihong Sun

The ionospheric mapping function (MF) for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), a mutual projection method for the slant total electron content (STEC) and vertical total electron content, is one of the significant factors affecting the performance of ionospheric models. The commonly used MF assumes isotropic TEC variations and takes into account only the satellite elevation angle, which may result in significant ionospheric projection errors, especially at low elevation angles. Based on the single-layer model, we propose an additional azimuth parameter mapping function (APMF). The APMF was estimated and evaluated by the NeQuick model during the periods of January 2014 and January 2022 from the aspect of simulation and measured STEC during the periods of 2014 and 2022 from the aspect of actual measurements over China, respectively. Compared to the modified single-layer model mapping function (MSLM-MF), the experimental results indicate that (1) The APMF can significantly reduce the ionospheric projection error, and the fluctuation in errors with different azimuth angles is small. (2) According to the evaluation based on the NeQuick simulation during the TEC peak time, when the ionosphere is quite active, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute projection error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in January 2014 are reduced by 56.1% and 60.0%, respectively, and in January 2022, they are reduced by 67.7% and 65.2%, respectively. Similarly, the upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 54.7% and 67.5% in January 2014 and January 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) is improved by 47.0% in January 2014 and 58.3% in January 2022. (3) According to the evaluation based on the measured STEC from GNSS raw data during the TEC peak time, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute mapping error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in 2014 are reduced by 48.9% and 46.9%, respectively, while in 2022, they are reduced by 48.3% and 41.2%, respectively. The upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 41.8% and 35.2% in 2014 and 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of RMSE is improved by 44.6% in 2014 and 39.2% in 2022.

全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)的电离层映射函数(MF)是斜向电子总含量(STEC)和垂直电子总含量的相互投影方法,是影响电离层模型性能的重要因素之一。常用的相互投影法假定各向同性的 TEC 变化,并且只考虑卫星仰角,这可能会导致严重的电离层投影误差,特别是在低仰角时。在单层模型的基础上,我们提出了一个额外的方位角参数映射函数(APMF)。在 2014 年 1 月和 2022 年 1 月期间,NeQuick 模型分别从模拟和实测 STEC 的角度对 APMF 进行了估计和评估。与改进的单层模型映射函数(MSLM-MF)相比,实验结果表明:(1)APMF 能显著减小电离层投影误差,且误差随不同方位角的波动较小。(2)根据在电离层相当活跃的 TEC 峰值时段基于 NeQuick 仿真的评估,2014 年 1 月 APMF 相对于 MSLM-MF 的绝对投影误差方框图的上四分位数和下四分位数分别减少了 56.1%和 60.0%,2022 年 1 月分别减少了 67.7%和 65.2%。同样,2014 年 1 月和 2022 年 1 月方框图中的上须分别减少了 54.7% 和 67.5%;APMF 的均方根误差(RMSE)性能在 2014 年 1 月提高了 47.0%,在 2022 年 1 月提高了 58.3%。(3) 根据在 TEC 高峰时段从 GNSS 原始数据测得的 STEC 评估,2014 年 APMF 相对于 MSLM-MF 的绝对映射误差方框图的上四分位数和下四分位数分别减少了 48.9% 和 46.9%,2022 年则分别减少了 48.3% 和 41.2%。方框图中的上须在 2014 年和 2022 年分别减少了 41.8% 和 35.2%;就 RMSE 而言,APMF 的性能在 2014 年提高了 44.6%,在 2022 年提高了 39.2%。
{"title":"A novel ionospheric TEC mapping function with azimuth parameters and its application to the Chinese region","authors":"Xingliang Huo, Yuanliang Long, Haojie Liu, Yunbin Yuan, Qi Liu, Ying Li, Mingming Liu, Yanwen Liu, Weihong Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01819-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01819-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ionospheric mapping function (MF) for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), a mutual projection method for the slant total electron content (STEC) and vertical total electron content, is one of the significant factors affecting the performance of ionospheric models. The commonly used MF assumes isotropic TEC variations and takes into account only the satellite elevation angle, which may result in significant ionospheric projection errors, especially at low elevation angles. Based on the single-layer model, we propose an additional azimuth parameter mapping function (APMF). The APMF was estimated and evaluated by the NeQuick model during the periods of January 2014 and January 2022 from the aspect of simulation and measured STEC during the periods of 2014 and 2022 from the aspect of actual measurements over China, respectively. Compared to the modified single-layer model mapping function (MSLM-MF), the experimental results indicate that (1) The APMF can significantly reduce the ionospheric projection error, and the fluctuation in errors with different azimuth angles is small. (2) According to the evaluation based on the NeQuick simulation during the TEC peak time, when the ionosphere is quite active, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute projection error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in January 2014 are reduced by 56.1% and 60.0%, respectively, and in January 2022, they are reduced by 67.7% and 65.2%, respectively. Similarly, the upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 54.7% and 67.5% in January 2014 and January 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE) is improved by 47.0% in January 2014 and 58.3% in January 2022. (3) According to the evaluation based on the measured STEC from GNSS raw data during the TEC peak time, the upper and lower quartiles of the absolute mapping error boxplot of the APMF relative to the MSLM-MF in 2014 are reduced by 48.9% and 46.9%, respectively, while in 2022, they are reduced by 48.3% and 41.2%, respectively. The upper whiskers in the boxplot are reduced by 41.8% and 35.2% in 2014 and 2022, respectively; the APMF performance in terms of RMSE is improved by 44.6% in 2014 and 39.2% in 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139728113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A unified model of multi-GNSS and multi‑frequency precise point positioning for the joint estimation of ionospheric TEC and time-varying receiver code bias 联合估计电离层 TEC 和时变接收器编码偏差的多全球导航卫星系统和多频率精确点定位统一模型
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01808-z

Abstract

The short-term variability in receiver code biases (RCBs) has been identified as a prominent source of error leading to the degradation of precise point positioning (PPP) performance and ionospheric total electron content (TEC) estimation accuracy. To minimize the adverse impact of RCB variability, this study extends the modified PPP (MPPP) method from the GPS only dual-frequency (DF) model to multifrequency (MF) and multiconstellation cases. In the MF MPPP method, multi-GNSS (GPS, BDS and Galileo) dual-, triple- or even arbitrary-frequency observations can be jointly processed in a flexible and reliable way by taking the time-varying RCBs of all available signals into account. Benefiting from this, the between-epoch fluctuations experienced by RCBs for all constellations and frequencies can be detected and their adverse impacts on the ionospheric observables and ambiguity parameters are mitigated. Compared to the traditional MF PPP method, the retrieval accuracy of the multi-GNSS-based ionospheric observables using our proposed method can be improved by more than 74% in the presence of significant intraday RCB variations. The variation trends are not always consistent for RCBs in different frequency bands for different satellite systems. The dependence of multi-GNSS and MF RCB variations on the ambient temperature is also verified. The percentages of the stations analyzed with the absolute Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) values above 0.8 for BDS are higher than those of GPS and Galileo, and the temperature dependence of RCB on the second frequency band is higher than those of the first frequency band for all the three constellations.

摘要 接收机码偏差(RCB)的短期变化已被确定为导致精确点定位(PPP)性能和电离层电子总含量(TEC)估计精度下降的一个主要误差来源。为了尽量减少 RCB 变异的不利影响,本研究将修正的 PPP(MPPP)方法从 GPS 唯一的双频(DF)模型扩展到多频(MF)和多星座情况。在多频 MPPP 方法中,通过考虑所有可用信号的时变 RCB,可以灵活可靠地联合处理多全球导航卫星系统(GPS、BDS 和伽利略)的双频、三频甚至任意频率观测数据。得益于此,可以检测到所有星座和频率的 RCB 所经历的波段间波动,并减轻其对电离层观测值和模糊参数的不利影响。与传统的 MF PPP 方法相比,在 RCB 日内变化显著的情况下,使用我们提出的方法对基于多重全球导航卫星系统的电离层观测数据进行检索的准确性可提高 74% 以上。不同卫星系统不同频段的 RCB 的变化趋势并不总是一致的。多全球导航卫星系统和中频 RCB 变化与环境温度的关系也得到了验证。在所分析的台站中,BDS 的绝对皮尔逊相关系数(PCC)值超过 0.8 的台站所占百分比高于 GPS 和伽利略,而且所有三个星座的 RCB 对第二频段的温度依赖性均高于第一频段。
{"title":"A unified model of multi-GNSS and multi‑frequency precise point positioning for the joint estimation of ionospheric TEC and time-varying receiver code bias","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01808-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01808-z","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The short-term variability in receiver code biases (RCBs) has been identified as a prominent source of error leading to the degradation of precise point positioning (PPP) performance and ionospheric total electron content (TEC) estimation accuracy. To minimize the adverse impact of RCB variability, this study extends the modified PPP (MPPP) method from the GPS only dual-frequency (DF) model to multifrequency (MF) and multiconstellation cases. In the MF MPPP method, multi-GNSS (GPS, BDS and Galileo) dual-, triple- or even arbitrary-frequency observations can be jointly processed in a flexible and reliable way by taking the time-varying RCBs of all available signals into account. Benefiting from this, the between-epoch fluctuations experienced by RCBs for all constellations and frequencies can be detected and their adverse impacts on the ionospheric observables and ambiguity parameters are mitigated. Compared to the traditional MF PPP method, the retrieval accuracy of the multi-GNSS-based ionospheric observables using our proposed method can be improved by more than 74% in the presence of significant intraday RCB variations. The variation trends are not always consistent for RCBs in different frequency bands for different satellite systems. The dependence of multi-GNSS and MF RCB variations on the ambient temperature is also verified. The percentages of the stations analyzed with the absolute Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) values above 0.8 for BDS are higher than those of GPS and Galileo, and the temperature dependence of RCB on the second frequency band is higher than those of the first frequency band for all the three constellations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139700706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Minimum-entropy velocity estimation from GPS position time series 从 GPS 定位时间序列估算最小熵速度
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-02-02 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01820-3
Jarir Saleh, Richard A. Bennett, Simon D. P. Williams

We propose a nonparametric minimum entropy method for estimating an optimal velocity from position time series, which may contain unknown noise, data gaps, loading effects, transients, outliers and step discontinuities. Although nonparametric, the proposed method is based on elementary statistical concepts familiar to least-squares and maximum-likelihood users. It seeks a constant velocity with a best possible (realistic) variance rather than a best variable velocity fit to the closest position data. We show, based on information theory, synthetic and real data, that minimum-entropy velocity estimation: (1) accounts for colored noise without assumptions about its distribution or the extent of its temporal correlations; (2) is unaffected by the series deterministic content such as an initial position and the heights of step discontinuities and insensitive to small-amplitude periodic variations and transients; (3) is robust against outliers and, for long time series, against step discontinuities and even slight non-stationarity of the noise; (4) does not involve covariance matrices or eigen/singular value analysis, thus can be implemented by a short and efficient software; (5) under no circumstances results in a velocity variance that decays as (1/N), where (N) is the number of observations. The proposed method is verified based on synthetic data and then applied to a few hundred NGL (Nevada Geodetic Lab) position time series of different characteristics, and the results are compared to those of the Median Interannual Difference Adjusted for Skewness (MIDAS) algorithm. The compared time series include continuous and linear ones used to test the agreement between the two methods in the presence of unknown noise, data gaps and loading effects, discontinuous but linear series selected to include the effect of a few (1–4) discontinuities, and nonlinear but continuous time series selected for including the effects of transients. Both the minimum-entropy and MIDAS methods are nonparametric in the sense that they only extract the velocity from a position time series with hardly any explicit assumptions about its noise distribution or correlation structure. Otherwise, the two methods differ in every single possible technical sense. Other than pointing to a close agreement between the derived velocities, the comparisons consistently revealed that minimum-entropy velocity uncertainties suggest a smaller degree of temporal correlations in the NGL time series than the MIDAS does.

我们提出了一种非参数最小熵方法,用于从位置时间序列中估算出最佳速度,这些时间序列可能包含未知噪声、数据间隙、加载效应、瞬态、异常值和阶跃不连续性。虽然是非参数法,但所提出的方法基于最小二乘和最大似然法用户所熟悉的基本统计概念。它寻求的是具有最佳可能(现实)方差的恒定速度,而不是与最近位置数据拟合的最佳可变速度。我们以信息论、合成数据和真实数据为基础,证明了最小熵速度估计:(2) 不受序列确定性内容(如初始位置和阶跃不连续高度)的影响,对小振幅周期性变化和瞬态不敏感;(4) 不涉及协方差矩阵或特征/奇异值分析,因此可以通过一个简短高效的软件来实现; (5) 在任何情况下都不会导致速度方差以 (1/N) 的形式衰减,其中 (N) 是观测值的数量。基于合成数据对所提出的方法进行了验证,然后将其应用于几百个具有不同特征的 NGL(内华达大地测量实验室)位置时间序列,并将结果与经偏度调整的年际差值中值(MIDAS)算法的结果进行了比较。比较的时间序列包括连续和线性时间序列,用于测试两种方法在未知噪声、数据间隙和负载效应情况下的一致性;不连续但线性的时间序列,用于包含少数(1-4 个)不连续的影响;非线性但连续的时间序列,用于包含瞬变的影响。最小熵方法和 MIDAS 方法都是非参数方法,因为它们只从位置时间序列中提取速度,几乎不对其噪声分布或相关结构作任何明确的假设。除此之外,这两种方法在所有可能的技术意义上都存在差异。除了得出的速度接近一致外,比较结果还一致表明,最小熵速度不确定性表明 NGL 时间序列的时间相关性程度比 MIDAS 方法要小。
{"title":"Minimum-entropy velocity estimation from GPS position time series","authors":"Jarir Saleh, Richard A. Bennett, Simon D. P. Williams","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01820-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01820-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We propose a nonparametric minimum entropy method for estimating an optimal velocity from position time series, which may contain unknown noise, data gaps, loading effects, transients, outliers and step discontinuities. Although nonparametric, the proposed method is based on elementary statistical concepts familiar to least-squares and maximum-likelihood users. It seeks a constant velocity with a best possible (realistic) variance rather than a best variable velocity fit to the closest position data. We show, based on information theory, synthetic and real data, that minimum-entropy velocity estimation: (1) accounts for colored noise without assumptions about its distribution or the extent of its temporal correlations; (2) is unaffected by the series deterministic content such as an initial position and the heights of step discontinuities and insensitive to small-amplitude periodic variations and transients; (3) is robust against outliers and, for long time series, against step discontinuities and even slight non-stationarity of the noise; (4) does not involve covariance matrices or eigen/singular value analysis, thus can be implemented by a short and efficient software; (5) under no circumstances results in a velocity variance that decays as <span>(1/N)</span>, where <span>(N)</span> is the number of observations. The proposed method is verified based on synthetic data and then applied to a few hundred NGL (Nevada Geodetic Lab) position time series of different characteristics, and the results are compared to those of the Median Interannual Difference Adjusted for Skewness (MIDAS) algorithm. The compared time series include continuous and linear ones used to test the agreement between the two methods in the presence of unknown noise, data gaps and loading effects, discontinuous but linear series selected to include the effect of a few (1–4) discontinuities, and nonlinear but continuous time series selected for including the effects of transients. Both the minimum-entropy and MIDAS methods are nonparametric in the sense that they only extract the velocity from a position time series with hardly any explicit assumptions about its noise distribution or correlation structure. Otherwise, the two methods differ in every single possible technical sense. Other than pointing to a close agreement between the derived velocities, the comparisons consistently revealed that minimum-entropy velocity uncertainties suggest a smaller degree of temporal correlations in the NGL time series than the MIDAS does.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139660778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reconstruction of global ionospheric TEC maps from IRI-2020 model based on deep learning method 基于深度学习方法从 IRI-2020 模型重建全球电离层 TEC 地图
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01818-x

Abstract

The Total Electron Content (TEC) computed from ionospheric models is a widely used parameter for characterizing the morphological structure of the ionosphere. The global TEC maps from empirical models, like the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model, have limited accuracy compared to those calculated by dual-frequency measurements from the global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). We have developed a reconstructed IRI TEC model for generating high-precision global TEC maps based on a deep learning method. For this, we have collected 48,204 pairs of global TEC maps from the IRI-2020 model and Global Ionosphere Maps (GIM) model with 2-h time resolution from 2009 to 2019 covering the whole solar cycle 24. The daily solar radio flux (F10.7), sunspot number (SSN), Dst, and Kp indices are also introduced as input features to train the model. We have investigated the optimum combination of the input parameters for the reconstructed TEC model and compared the performance of the model during the years with high and low solar activity levels. Results show that the reconstructed TEC model with F10.7 and Kp features has a better performance compared to that considering all solar and geomagnetic indices. The global TEC maps predicted from our model are much more consistent with the corresponding TEC maps from the GIM model than those from the IRI-2020 model. Especially, the large-scale equatorial ionospheric anomaly (EIA) crests and the pronounced enhancement of TEC are well predicted by the reconstructed TEC model. From statistical metrics, the accuracy of the reconstructed TEC model increased by 40.8% during the high solar activity year 2015 and 43.0% during the low solar activity year 2018 compared with the IRI-2020 model. The prediction performance of the reconstructed TEC model also shows better accuracy during the storm periods.

摘要 根据电离层模型计算的总电子含量(TEC)是描述电离层形态结构的一个广泛使用的参数。与全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)的双频测量结果相比,国际参考电离层(IRI)模型等经验模型计算出的全球总电子含量图精度有限。我们开发了一种基于深度学习方法的重构 IRI TEC 模型,用于生成高精度的全球 TEC 地图。为此,我们从 IRI-2020 模型和全球电离层地图(GIM)模型中收集了 48204 对全球 TEC 地图,时间分辨率为 2 小时,时间跨度从 2009 年到 2019 年,覆盖整个太阳周期 24。我们还引入了每日太阳射电通量(F10.7)、太阳黑子数(SSN)、Dst 和 Kp 指数作为训练模型的输入特征。我们研究了重构 TEC 模型输入参数的最佳组合,并比较了模型在太阳活动水平较高和较低年份的性能。结果表明,使用 F10.7 和 Kp 特征重建的 TEC 模型比考虑所有太阳和地磁指数的模型性能更好。与 IRI-2020 模型相比,我们的模型预测的全球 TEC 图与 GIM 模型的相应 TEC 图更加一致。特别是,重建的 TEC 模型很好地预测了大尺度赤道电离层异常峰和 TEC 的明显增强。从统计指标来看,与IRI-2020模型相比,重构TEC模型在太阳活动旺盛的2015年准确率提高了40.8%,在太阳活动低迷的2018年准确率提高了43.0%。重建的 TEC 模型在风暴期间的预测性能也显示出更好的准确性。
{"title":"Reconstruction of global ionospheric TEC maps from IRI-2020 model based on deep learning method","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01818-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01818-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The Total Electron Content (TEC) computed from ionospheric models is a widely used parameter for characterizing the morphological structure of the ionosphere. The global TEC maps from empirical models, like the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model, have limited accuracy compared to those calculated by dual-frequency measurements from the global navigation satellite systems (GNSS). We have developed a reconstructed IRI TEC model for generating high-precision global TEC maps based on a deep learning method. For this, we have collected 48,204 pairs of global TEC maps from the IRI-2020 model and Global Ionosphere Maps (GIM) model with 2-h time resolution from 2009 to 2019 covering the whole solar cycle 24. The daily solar radio flux (<em>F</em><sub>10.7</sub>), sunspot number (SSN), Dst, and <em>K</em>p indices are also introduced as input features to train the model. We have investigated the optimum combination of the input parameters for the reconstructed TEC model and compared the performance of the model during the years with high and low solar activity levels. Results show that the reconstructed TEC model with <em>F</em><sub>10.7</sub> and <em>K</em>p features has a better performance compared to that considering all solar and geomagnetic indices. The global TEC maps predicted from our model are much more consistent with the corresponding TEC maps from the GIM model than those from the IRI-2020 model. Especially, the large-scale equatorial ionospheric anomaly (EIA) crests and the pronounced enhancement of TEC are well predicted by the reconstructed TEC model. From statistical metrics, the accuracy of the reconstructed TEC model increased by 40.8% during the high solar activity year 2015 and 43.0% during the low solar activity year 2018 compared with the IRI-2020 model. The prediction performance of the reconstructed TEC model also shows better accuracy during the storm periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139655764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The miniSLR: a low-budget, high-performance satellite laser ranging ground station miniSLR:低成本、高性能的卫星激光测距地面站
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01814-1
Daniel Hampf, Felicitas Niebler, Tristan Meyer, Wolfgang Riede

Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is an established technique providing very accurate position measurements of satellites in Earth orbit. However, despite decades of development, it remains a complex and expensive technology, which impedes its further growth to new applications and users. The miniSLR implements a complete SLR system within a small, transportable enclosure. Through this design, costs of ownership can be reduced significantly, and the process of establishing a new SLR site is greatly simplified. A number of novel technical solutions have been implemented to achieve a good laser ranging performance despite the small size and simplified design. Data from the initial six months of test operation have been used to generate a first estimation of the system performance. The data include measurements to many of the important SLR satellites, such as Lageos, Etalon and most of the geodetic and Earth observation missions in LEO. It is shown that the miniSLR achieves sub-centimetre accuracy, comparable with conventional SLR systems. The miniSLR is an engineering station in the International Laser Ranging Service and supplies data to the community. Continuous efforts are undertaken to further improve the system operation and stability.

卫星激光测距(SLR)是一项成熟的技术,可对地球轨道上的卫星进行非常精确的位置测量。然而,尽管经过几十年的发展,它仍然是一项复杂而昂贵的技术,这阻碍了它在新应用和新用户方面的进一步发展。miniSLR 在一个小巧、可运输的外壳内实现了完整的单反系统。通过这种设计,可大大降低拥有成本,并大大简化建立新单反站点的过程。为了在体积小、设计简化的情况下实现良好的激光测距性能,我们采用了许多新颖的技术解决方案。最初六个月的测试运行数据被用来对系统性能进行初步估算。这些数据包括对许多重要的 SLR 卫星进行的测量,如 Lageos、Etalon 以及低地轨道上的大多数大地测量和地球观测任务。结果表明,miniSLR 的精度达到亚厘米级,可与传统的 SLR 系统媲美。微型SLR 是国际激光测距服务中的一个工程站,向社会提供数据。正在继续努力进一步改进系统的运行和稳定性。
{"title":"The miniSLR: a low-budget, high-performance satellite laser ranging ground station","authors":"Daniel Hampf, Felicitas Niebler, Tristan Meyer, Wolfgang Riede","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01814-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01814-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) is an established technique providing very accurate position measurements of satellites in Earth orbit. However, despite decades of development, it remains a complex and expensive technology, which impedes its further growth to new applications and users. The miniSLR implements a complete SLR system within a small, transportable enclosure. Through this design, costs of ownership can be reduced significantly, and the process of establishing a new SLR site is greatly simplified. A number of novel technical solutions have been implemented to achieve a good laser ranging performance despite the small size and simplified design. Data from the initial six months of test operation have been used to generate a first estimation of the system performance. The data include measurements to many of the important SLR satellites, such as Lageos, Etalon and most of the geodetic and Earth observation missions in LEO. It is shown that the miniSLR achieves sub-centimetre accuracy, comparable with conventional SLR systems. The miniSLR is an engineering station in the International Laser Ranging Service and supplies data to the community. Continuous efforts are undertaken to further improve the system operation and stability.\u0000</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139574085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
IAG Newsletter 国际咨询组通讯
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01816-z
Gyula Tóth
{"title":"IAG Newsletter","authors":"Gyula Tóth","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01816-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01816-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140938077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An improved equation of latitude and a global system of graticule distance coordinates 改进的纬度方程和全球格距坐标系
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01815-0
Geoffrey Blewitt

Two innovations are presented for coordinate time-series computation. First, an improved solution is given to a century-old problem, that is the non-iterative computation of conventional geodetic (CG: latitude, longitude, height) coordinates from geocentric Cartesian (GC: x, y, z) coordinates. The accuracy is 1 nm for heights < 500 km and < 10−15 rad for latitude at any point, terrestrial or outer space. This can be 3 orders of magnitude more accurate than published non-iterative methods. Secondly, CG time series are transformed into a practical system of “graticule distance” (GD: easting, northing, height) curvilinear coordinates that, unlike the commonly used system of topocentric Cartesian (TC: east, north, up) coordinates, is global in nature without arbitrary specification of GC reference coordinates for every geodetic station. Since 2011, Nevada Geodetic Laboratory has publicly produced time series for 20,000 GPS stations in GD form that have been cited by hundreds of studies. The GD system facilitates direct comparison of positions for co-located stations. Users of GD time series are able: (1) to resolve different historical station names that have been assigned to the same physical benchmark and (2) to resolve different physical benchmarks that have been assigned the same name. This benefits historical reconstruction of benchmark occupation and local site tie analysis for reference frame integrity. GD coordinates have archival value, in that inversion back to GC coordinates is practically exact. For geodetic stations, GD time series closely emulate TC time series with rates agreeing to 0.01 mm/yr, and so can be used interchangeably.

在坐标时间序列计算方面有两项创新。首先,对一个百年难题给出了改进的解决方案,即从地心笛卡尔坐标(GC:x、y、z)非迭代计算传统大地坐标(CG:纬度、经度、高度)。在地面或外太空的任何一点,高度 < 500 千米的精度为 1 nm,纬度为 10-15 rad。这比已公布的非迭代法要精确 3 个数量级。其次,大地测量时间序列被转换为实用的 "格距"(GD:东经、北纬、高度)曲线坐标系统,与常用的地心笛卡尔(TC:东、北、上)坐标系统不同,该坐标系统具有全球性质,无需为每个大地测量站任意指定 GC 参考坐标。自 2011 年以来,内华达大地测量实验室以 GD 形式公开发布了 20,000 个 GPS 站点的时间序列,已被数百项研究引用。GD 系统便于直接比较共址站点的位置。全球定位系统时间序列的用户能够:(1) 解决分配给同一物理基准的不同历史站点名称问题;(2) 解决分配给同一名称的不同物理基准问题。这有利于基准占用的历史重建和参考框架完整性的当地站点连接分析。全球定位系统坐标具有存档价值,因为反演回到全球定位系统坐标实际上是精确的。对于大地测量站而言,GD 时间序列与 TC 时间序列非常接近,其速率为 0.01 毫米/年,因此可以互换使用。
{"title":"An improved equation of latitude and a global system of graticule distance coordinates","authors":"Geoffrey Blewitt","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01815-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01815-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two innovations are presented for coordinate time-series computation. First, an improved solution is given to a century-old problem, that is the non-iterative computation of conventional geodetic (CG: latitude, longitude, height) coordinates from geocentric Cartesian (GC: <i>x</i>, <i>y</i>, <i>z</i>) coordinates. The accuracy is 1 nm for heights &lt; 500 km and &lt; 10<sup>−15</sup> rad for latitude at any point, terrestrial or outer space. This can be 3 orders of magnitude more accurate than published non-iterative methods. Secondly, CG time series are transformed into a practical system of “graticule distance” (GD: easting, northing, height) curvilinear coordinates that, unlike the commonly used system of topocentric Cartesian (TC: east, north, up) coordinates, is global in nature without arbitrary specification of GC reference coordinates for every geodetic station. Since 2011, Nevada Geodetic Laboratory has publicly produced time series for 20,000 GPS stations in GD form that have been cited by hundreds of studies. The GD system facilitates direct comparison of positions for co-located stations. Users of GD time series are able: (1) to resolve different historical station names that have been assigned to the same physical benchmark and (2) to resolve different physical benchmarks that have been assigned the same name. This benefits historical reconstruction of benchmark occupation and local site tie analysis for reference frame integrity. GD coordinates have archival value, in that inversion back to GC coordinates is practically exact. For geodetic stations, GD time series closely emulate TC time series with rates agreeing to 0.01 mm/yr, and so can be used interchangeably.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139379578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multi-constellation GNSS interferometric reflectometry for tidal analysis: mitigations for K1 and K2 biases due to GPS geometrical errors 用于潮汐分析的多星座全球导航卫星系统干涉反射测量法:减轻全球定位系统几何误差造成的 K1 和 K2 偏差
IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI: 10.1007/s00190-023-01812-3
Dongju Peng, Yunung Nina Lin, Jui-Chi Lee, Hsuan-Han Su, Emma M. Hill

It has been observed that when using sea levels derived from GPS (Global Positioning System) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) data to perform tidal analysis, the luni-solar semidiurnal (K2) and the luni-solar diurnal (K1) constituents are biased due to geometrical errors in the reflection data, which result from their periods coinciding with the GPS orbital period and revisit period. In this work, we use 18 months of GNSS SNR data from multiple frequencies and multiple constellations at three sites to further investigate the biases and how to mitigate them. We first estimate sea levels using SNR data from the GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo signals, both individually and by combination. Secondly, we conduct tidal harmonic analysis using these sea-level estimates. By comparing the eight major tidal constituents estimated from SNR data with those estimated from the co-located tide-gauge records, we find that the biases in the K1 and K2 amplitudes from GPS S1C, S2X and S5X SNR data can reach 5 cm, and they can be mitigated by supplementing GLONASS- and Galileo-based sea-level estimates. With a proper combination of sea-level estimates from GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo, SNR-based tidal constituents can reach agreement at the millimeter level with those from tide gauges.

据观察,在使用全球定位系统信噪比(SNR)数据得出的海平面进行潮汐分析时,由于反射数据中的几何误差(其周期与全球定位系统轨道周期和重访周期相吻合),月太阳半日(K2)和月太阳日(K1)成分会出现偏差。在这项工作中,我们使用了三个站点 18 个月的多个频率和多个星座的 GNSS SNR 数据,以进一步研究偏差和如何减轻偏差。我们首先利用 GPS、格罗纳斯和伽利略信号的信噪比数据,单独或组合估算海平面。其次,我们利用这些海平面估计值进行潮汐谐波分析。通过比较信噪比数据估算的八种主要潮汐成分与同址验潮仪记录估算的潮汐成分,我们发现 GPS S1C、S2X 和 S5X 信噪比数据的 K1 和 K2 振幅偏差可达 5 厘米,通过补充基于全球轨道导航卫星系统和伽利略的海平面估算值,这些偏差可以得到缓解。将全球定位系统、全球轨道导航卫星系统和伽利略的海平面估计数据适当结合起来,基于信噪比的潮汐成分与验潮仪的潮汐成分可以达到毫米级的一致。
{"title":"Multi-constellation GNSS interferometric reflectometry for tidal analysis: mitigations for K1 and K2 biases due to GPS geometrical errors","authors":"Dongju Peng, Yunung Nina Lin, Jui-Chi Lee, Hsuan-Han Su, Emma M. Hill","doi":"10.1007/s00190-023-01812-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01812-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>It has been observed that when using sea levels derived from GPS (Global Positioning System) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) data to perform tidal analysis, the luni-solar semidiurnal (K2) and the luni-solar diurnal (K1) constituents are biased due to geometrical errors in the reflection data, which result from their periods coinciding with the GPS orbital period and revisit period. In this work, we use 18 months of GNSS SNR data from multiple frequencies and multiple constellations at three sites to further investigate the biases and how to mitigate them. We first estimate sea levels using SNR data from the GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo signals, both individually and by combination. Secondly, we conduct tidal harmonic analysis using these sea-level estimates. By comparing the eight major tidal constituents estimated from SNR data with those estimated from the co-located tide-gauge records, we find that the biases in the K1 and K2 amplitudes from GPS S1C, S2X and S5X SNR data can reach 5 cm, and they can be mitigated by supplementing GLONASS- and Galileo-based sea-level estimates. With a proper combination of sea-level estimates from GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo, SNR-based tidal constituents can reach agreement at the millimeter level with those from tide gauges.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139076564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Geodesy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1