Journal of Applied Biomechanics最新文献

Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) enable accurate estimation of anatomical joint angles but require a sensor-to-segment calibration. Literature has presented several algorithms that address this gap; however, adequately comparing calibration performance is not trivial. This study compares 3 calibration methods: N-pose calibration (NP), functional calibration (FC), and manual alignment (MA) to estimate 3D wrist joint angles during single-plane and multiplane tasks. Thirteen healthy participants were instrumented with IMUs and optical markers to compute the range of motion error (ε), root mean squared error, and offset between the joint angles from the optical reference and each IMU calibration (NP, FC, and MA) as dependent variables. We then performed 3-way repeated-measures analyses of variance on each dependent variable to evaluate interactions between calibrations, tasks, and joint axes. NP showed the worst root mean squared error (8.34° [7.41°]) performance in the calibration main effect (η2G = .095) and calibration × tasks interaction (η2G = .121). In an exploratory analysis, FC performed best (main effect root mean squared error = 6.52° [4.47°]) in the offset calibration × axes interaction in single-plane (η2G = .160) tasks. Therefore, we recommend FC to optimally perform wrist calibration and against NP. These findings are viable in aiding the development of portable IMU-based clinical motion-tracking devices.

A novel shear force control task has previously been shown to elucidate different neuromuscular control strategies among individuals after anterior cruciate ligament injury, individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, uninjured collegiate athletes, and uninjured recreational athletes. However, the reliability of the methodology has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of this methodology in a population with no lower-extremity injury. Thirteen individuals (7 men, 24.7 [4.8] y, body mass index: 23.9 [3.6] kg/m2) completed a standing force control task in the medial/lateral and anterior/posterior directions for each leg on 2 separate occasions (1 wk apart). Intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% confidence intervals, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change were calculated to assess the reliability of largest Lyapunov exponent values. Intraclass correlation coefficient values across all measures were good to excellent (r = .78-.92). Reliability was highest in the medial/lateral direction at the right lower extremity (r = .92; 95% confidence interval, .75-.98, P = .025). The shear force control task exhibited good to excellent reliability across measures, suggesting that it can reliably measure force control variability. This methodology may provide insight into neuromuscular control strategies following injury.

This study investigated differences in muscle synergies in the trunk and lower limbs during single-leg hops at 30% (SLH30) and 100% (SLH100) of maximum distance to understand the neuromechanical mechanisms underlying longer hop distances. Unilateral surface EMG data were collected from 16 muscle groups in the trunk and lower limbs during both SLH30 and SLH100 in 10 healthy males. Nonnegative matrix factorization was used to extract muscle synergies. The number of muscle synergies in SLH100 was significantly higher than in SLH30 (P = .0078, effect size = 1.28), with median values of 4.0 (3.0-5.0) for SLH30 and 5.0 (4.0-6.0) for SLH100. We identified 4 shared muscle synergies between SLH30 and SLH100, signifying a foundational neuromuscular control strategy. In addition, muscle synergies specific to SLH100 demonstrated the involvement of abdominal muscles and hip and ankle extensor muscles, highlighting their contributions to achieving longer hopping distances. Interventions aimed at enhancing SLH performance for return to sport may benefit from incorporating exercises targeting these synergy patterns. However, it should be noted that SLH100 synergies primarily involved nonknee muscles, warranting caution when using SLH as an indicator of knee function as improvements in hop distance may not directly reflect knee-specific recovery.

This study quantified vertical ground reaction forces (vGRFs) and lower limb stiffness for both sexes walking and running with body-borne load over 2 surfaces. Nine males and 9 females had lower limb biomechanics quantified during a walk (1.3 m/s) and run (4.5 m/s) with (15 kg) and without (0 kg) body-borne load over a firm and soft foam surface. vGRF measures, and leg and lower limb joint stiffness were submitted to a linear mixed model. Loaded walking increased very GRF and stiffness measure (all: P < .016). Loaded running increased every GRF measure and knee stiffness (all: P < .033). The foam surface increased peak vGRF (P = .002, P = .010) and knee stiffness (P < .001, P = .004) during the walk and run, and leg (P < .001) and ankle (P = .025) stiffness during the run. Males walked with greater peak vGRF (P = .012), and stiffer hip and ankle (P = .026; P = .012), but ran with a stiffer knee on the foam (P = .041) and stiffer hip on the firm (P = .005) surface than females. Loaded walking and running may elevate injury risk by increasing vertical GRFs and lower limb stiffness. Injury risk may also increase for locomotion over a foam surface, especially for males.

To increase understanding in development of running injuries, the biomechanical load over time should be studied. Ground reaction force (GRF) is an important parameter for biomechanical analyses and is typically measured in a controlled lab environment. GRF can be estimated outdoors, however, the repeatability of this estimation is unknown. Repeatability is a crucial aspect if a measurement is repeated over prolonged periods of time. This study investigates the repeatability of a GRF estimation algorithm using inertial measurement units during outdoor running. Twelve well-trained participants completed 3 running sessions on different days, on an athletics track, instrumented with inertial measurement units on the lower legs and pelvis. Vertical accelerations were used to estimate the GRF. The goal was to assess the algorithm's repeatability across 3 sessions in a real-world setting, aiming to bridge the gap between laboratory and outdoor measurements. Results showed a good level of repeatability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (2, k) of .86 for peak GRF, root mean square error of .08 times body weight (3.5%) and Pearson correlation coefficients exceeding .99 between the days. This is the first study looking into the day-to-day repeatability of the estimation of GRF, showing the potential to use this algorithm daily.

The calf raise test (CRT) is commonly used to assess triceps surae muscle-tendon unit function. Often, a metronome set to 60 beats/min (30 repetitions/min) is used to set the cadence of calf raise repetitions, but studies report using cadences ranging from 30 to 120 beats/min. We investigated the effect of cadence on CRT outcomes, accounting for the potential confounders of sex, age, body mass index, and physical activity. Thirty-six healthy individuals (50% female) performed single-leg calf raise repetitions to volitional exhaustion in 3 randomized cadence conditions, 7 days apart: 30, 60, and 120 beats/min. Repetitions, total vertical displacement, total work, peak height, and peak power were recorded using the validated Calf Raise application. Cadence significantly affected all CRT outcomes (P ≤ .008), except repetitions (P = .200). Post hoc analysis revealed 60 beats/min resulted in significantly greater total vertical displacement and work than 30 and 120 beats/min. Peak height was greater at 60 and 120 than 30 beats/min, and peak power was greater at 120 beats/min. Males generated greater work and peak power (P ≤ .001), whereas individuals with greater body mass index completed less repetitions (P = .008), achieved lower total vertical displacements (P = .003), and generated greater peak power (P = .005). CRT cadence is important to consider when interpreting CRT outcomes and comparing data between studies.

In many sports, practitioners must reach their maximal jump height (hmax) under time constraints. This requires a reduction of the countermovement depth and so of the push-off distance (hPO). The purpose of this study was to investigate how hPO influences force-velocity (F-v) profiles (F¯0, v¯0, P¯max, and SFv) and performance. Eleven participants (age: 26 [5] y, height: 175.6 [11.2] cm, mass: 76 [15] kg; squat 1RM: 129 [34] kg) performed maximal countermovement jumps. Kinetic and kinematic measurements were used to assess individual F-v profiles for 3 different hPO conditions (hPO-SMALL, hPO-MEDIUM, hPO-LARGE) from countermovement jumps performed under different load conditions (bodyweight [BW], BW + 8 kg, BW + 17 kg, BW + 40%1RM, BW + 70%1RM). Results indicated that F¯0 and P¯max changed across hPO conditions, while v¯0 remained constant. A lower hPO led to a significantly higher F¯0 and P¯max. These changes resulted in a steeper SFv leading to a more force-oriented profile, a lower optimal SFv and a greater F-v imbalance. Reducing hPO and modifying F-v profile led, to some extent, to a reduction in hmax. Performance is a compromise between hPO, P¯max, and F-v imbalance, all influenced by countermovement depth. This explains why reducing countermovement depth to meet time constraint may lower performance.

Repetitive manual labor tasks involving twisting, bending, and lifting commonly lead to lower back and knee injuries in the workplace. To identify tasks with high injury risk, we recruited N = 9 participants to perform industry-relevant, 2-handed lifts with a 11-kg weight. These included symmetrical/asymmetrical, ascending/descending lifts that varied in start-to-end heights (knee-to-waist and waist-to-shoulder). We used a data-driven musculoskeletal model that combined force and motion data with a muscle activation-informed solver (OpenSim, CEINMS) to estimate 3-dimensional internal joint contact forces (JCFs) in the lower back (L5/S1) and knee. Symmetrical lifting resulted in larger peak JCFs than asymmetrical lifting in both the L5/S1 (+20.2% normal [P < .01], +20.3% shear [P = .001], +20.6% total [P < .01]) and the knee (+39.2% shear [P = .001]), and there were no differences in peak JCFs between ascending versus descending motions. Below-the-waist lifting generated significantly greater JCFs in the L5/S1 and knee than above-the-waist lifts (P < .01). We found a positive correlation between knee and L5/S1 peak total JCFs (R2 = .60, P < .01) across the task space, suggesting motor coordination that favors sharing of load distribution across the trunk and legs during lifting.

The metabolic cost of walking for individuals with transtibial amputation is generally greater compared with able-bodied individuals. One aim of powered prostheses is to reduce metabolic deficits by replicating biological ankle function. Individuals with transtibial amputation can activate their residual limb muscles to volitionally control bionic ankle prostheses for walking; however, it is unknown how myoelectric control performs outside the laboratory. We recruited 6 individuals with transtibial amputation to walk an outdoor course with the Open Source Leg prosthesis under continuous proportional myoelectric control and compared it with their passive device. There were no significant differences (P = .142) in cost of transport between prostheses. Participants significantly increased residual limb vastus lateralis (P = .042) and rectus femoris (P = .029) muscle activity during early and midstance phase of walking with the powered prosthesis compared with their passive device. All but one participant preferred walking with myoelectric control compared with their passive prosthesis. The additional mass of the powered ankle prosthesis coupled with increased residual quadriceps activity could explain why the energy cost of walking was not lower compared with a passive prosthesis. This study demonstrates participants can volitionally control a bionic ankle prosthesis to navigate real-world environments.