Dominika Janiszewska-Latterini, Joana Ortigueira, Tiago F. Lopes, Julia Gościańska-Łowińska, Dobrochna Augustyniak-Wysocka, Ewa Leszczyszyn, Catarina Nobre
Biochar, a carbon-rich material produced from the pyrolysis of organic matter, has garnered attention for its potential agricultural and environmental benefits, including soil improvement, enhanced crop yields and climate change mitigation. Despite its promise, biochar adoption has been hindered by limited social awareness, particularly in industrialised countries. This review explores the factors influencing biochar's acceptance in agriculture and forestry, focusing on the social aspects that affect its integration. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies on social awareness and acceptance, revealing significant barriers such as a lack of knowledge among farmers, high production costs and insufficient infrastructure. In industrialised countries, while technical research on biochar has progressed, farmers often remain unfamiliar with its benefits, and resistance to adoption is common. Studies show that social factors such as age, education level and access to funding play a crucial role in biochar adoption. Furthermore, a lack of government incentives and unclear regulatory frameworks exacerbate the challenge. Conversely, studies from lower-income countries suggest that small-scale, cost-effective biochar production systems may hold promise. The review also identifies strategies to enhance biochar's social acceptance, including targeted education programs, financial incentives and clearer regulatory standards. Despite varying levels of social awareness, the literature suggests that with increased outreach, biochar could significantly contribute to sustainable agricultural practices globally. This review underscores the need for further research into the social dimensions of biochar adoption and the implementation of policies to foster its widespread use.
{"title":"Social Awareness as a Catalyst for Biochar Adoption in the Agricultural and Forestry Sectors","authors":"Dominika Janiszewska-Latterini, Joana Ortigueira, Tiago F. Lopes, Julia Gościańska-Łowińska, Dobrochna Augustyniak-Wysocka, Ewa Leszczyszyn, Catarina Nobre","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biochar, a carbon-rich material produced from the pyrolysis of organic matter, has garnered attention for its potential agricultural and environmental benefits, including soil improvement, enhanced crop yields and climate change mitigation. Despite its promise, biochar adoption has been hindered by limited social awareness, particularly in industrialised countries. This review explores the factors influencing biochar's acceptance in agriculture and forestry, focusing on the social aspects that affect its integration. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies on social awareness and acceptance, revealing significant barriers such as a lack of knowledge among farmers, high production costs and insufficient infrastructure. In industrialised countries, while technical research on biochar has progressed, farmers often remain unfamiliar with its benefits, and resistance to adoption is common. Studies show that social factors such as age, education level and access to funding play a crucial role in biochar adoption. Furthermore, a lack of government incentives and unclear regulatory frameworks exacerbate the challenge. Conversely, studies from lower-income countries suggest that small-scale, cost-effective biochar production systems may hold promise. The review also identifies strategies to enhance biochar's social acceptance, including targeted education programs, financial incentives and clearer regulatory standards. Despite varying levels of social awareness, the literature suggests that with increased outreach, biochar could significantly contribute to sustainable agricultural practices globally. This review underscores the need for further research into the social dimensions of biochar adoption and the implementation of policies to foster its widespread use.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70077","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohit Singh Rana, Rajesh Nandi, Paul B. Brown, Jen-Yi Huang, Ji-Qin Ni
Aquaculture sludge (AS), rich in nutrients, can pose environmental risks such as eutrophication, threatening aquatic ecosystems and water quality if not properly managed. However, AS can also be used as a feedstock for bioenergy production. This study investigated bioenergy (methane) production from AS and dairy manure (DM) under anaerobic codigestion using the biochemical methane potential test. Results showed that anaerobic codigestion of DM and AS produced higher methane production compared with their individual monodigestion. The DM:AS ratios of 50:50, 30:70, and 10:90 showed synergistic effects, with codigestion performance indices of 1.2, 1.3, and 1.5, respectively. A DM:AS ratio of 10:90 provided the highest methane production of 341.80 mL g−1 volatile solids, being 65% and 52% greater than those from monodigestion of these two feedstocks, respectively. A hydraulic retention time of 16 days was found optimum, attaining 90% of the cumulative methane production. The experimental data of methane production fitted perfectly with the superimposed model, reflecting contribution from both readily degradable and harder fractions of the feedstock mix. These findings present an approach to effective valorization and management of the nutrient-rich AS through enhanced energy recovery and promote sustainability in the aquaculture industry.
水产养殖污泥富含营养物质,如果管理不当,可能造成富营养化等环境风险,威胁水生生态系统和水质。然而,AS也可以用作生物能源生产的原料。采用生化甲烷电位试验研究了厌氧共消化条件下牛粪和牛粪的沼气产量。结果表明,与单独消化相比,DM和AS厌氧共消化产生的甲烷量更高。DM:AS比例为50:50、30:70和10:90时表现出协同效应,共消化性能指数分别为1.2、1.3和1.5。DM:AS比为10:90时,甲烷产量最高,为341.80 mL g−1挥发性固体,分别比单消化这两种原料的甲烷产量高65%和52%。水力滞留时间为16天,可达到累积甲烷产量的90%。甲烷产量的实验数据与叠加模型完全吻合,反映了原料混合物中容易降解和较硬的部分的贡献。这些发现为通过加强能量回收和促进水产养殖业的可持续性来有效地评估和管理营养丰富的AS提供了途径。
{"title":"Optimizing Feedstocks Mixing Ratio and Hydraulic Retention Time for Biogas Production From Anaerobic Codigestion of Dairy Manure and Aquaculture Sludge","authors":"Mohit Singh Rana, Rajesh Nandi, Paul B. Brown, Jen-Yi Huang, Ji-Qin Ni","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70079","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquaculture sludge (AS), rich in nutrients, can pose environmental risks such as eutrophication, threatening aquatic ecosystems and water quality if not properly managed. However, AS can also be used as a feedstock for bioenergy production. This study investigated bioenergy (methane) production from AS and dairy manure (DM) under anaerobic codigestion using the biochemical methane potential test. Results showed that anaerobic codigestion of DM and AS produced higher methane production compared with their individual monodigestion. The DM:AS ratios of 50:50, 30:70, and 10:90 showed synergistic effects, with codigestion performance indices of 1.2, 1.3, and 1.5, respectively. A DM:AS ratio of 10:90 provided the highest methane production of 341.80 mL g<sup>−1</sup> volatile solids, being 65% and 52% greater than those from monodigestion of these two feedstocks, respectively. A hydraulic retention time of 16 days was found optimum, attaining 90% of the cumulative methane production. The experimental data of methane production fitted perfectly with the superimposed model, reflecting contribution from both readily degradable and harder fractions of the feedstock mix. These findings present an approach to effective valorization and management of the nutrient-rich AS through enhanced energy recovery and promote sustainability in the aquaculture industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70079","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Siwar Saadaoui, David Makowski, Benoît Gabrielle, Thierry Brunelle
Lignocellulosic crops such as Miscanthus, Eucalyptus, Poplar, Willow, and Switchgrass are gaining attention as promising feedstocks for renewable energy and carbon-mitigation strategies, especially on marginal lands. Assessing their global yield potentials requires models that go beyond climate drivers alone. Using a global dataset of 3963 yield observations for five species, we developed a high-resolution (5-arc-minute) modeling framework that augments climate with detailed soil and topographic predictors. Among seven machine learning algorithms, Random Forest, Extra Trees, and Gradient Boosting (GB) emerged as top performers. On an independent test set, the best model achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.8 t DM ha−1 year−1 (across algorithms: 4.7–5.0 t DM ha−1 year−1) and an