Graciele Angnes, João Luis Nunes Carvalho, Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin
The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N2O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N2O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N2O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N2O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N2O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N2O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N2O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.
{"title":"Regional N2O Emission Factors From Bioethanol Crops in Brazil: Advances and Data Gaps","authors":"Graciele Angnes, João Luis Nunes Carvalho, Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N<sub>2</sub>O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N<sub>2</sub>O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N<sub>2</sub>O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N<sub>2</sub>O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N<sub>2</sub>O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70071","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Claudie-Maude Canuel, Evelyne Thiffault, Nelson Thiffault
Many jurisdictions within the boreal and temperate biomes have adopted targets to increase the contribution of forest bioenergy for climate change mitigation. Using residual forest biomass as feedstock is considered, but the carbon emission reductions associated with this practice remain controversial. Our study evaluated how intensifying wood procurement for bioenergy production, alongside supplying fiber for conventional wood industries, can support low-carbon forest management. We used six sites established in eastern Canada as a case study. We compared the carbon balance of four harvesting scenarios with increasing wood procurement intensity (from procuring sawtimber only to procuring sawtimber, pulpwood and biomass) to three scenarios of unharvested forests, two of which experienced natural disturbances. We modeled carbon fluxes over a 100-year simulation period, considering biogenic and fossil emissions from aboveground forest ecosystems, harvested wood products, and wood supply and manufacturing. We assessed the mitigation potential of procuring biomass to produce bioenergy in the form of stemwood, treetops (including branches) or pulpwood. We found that forest harvesting, regardless of the wood procurement intensity, offered limited carbon benefits compared to the referenced undisturbed mature stands in most cases. However, increasing wood procurement can reduce the carbon footprint of wood supply chains, with pulpwood identified as a key feedstock. Compared with harvesting roundwood for conventional industries only, procuring biomass for bioenergy is likely to increase carbon emissions unless it substitutes high-emission energy sources on markets or enhances the next-rotation stand yield, which seems achievable in the context we studied. Bioenergy displacement factors should range from 0.072 to 0.701 tonne of carbon emission reduction per tonne of carbon in the bioenergy product, depending on stand characteristics, biomass feedstock, and cutting cycle length. Our findings provide a foundation for assessing the GHG reduction potential of harvesting activities at a broader scale, considering varying feedstock recovery intensities.
{"title":"Leveraging Biomass Procurement to Mitigate Carbon Emissions at the Stand Level: A Case Study in Eastern Canadian Forests","authors":"Claudie-Maude Canuel, Evelyne Thiffault, Nelson Thiffault","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many jurisdictions within the boreal and temperate biomes have adopted targets to increase the contribution of forest bioenergy for climate change mitigation. Using residual forest biomass as feedstock is considered, but the carbon emission reductions associated with this practice remain controversial. Our study evaluated how intensifying wood procurement for bioenergy production, alongside supplying fiber for conventional wood industries, can support low-carbon forest management. We used six sites established in eastern Canada as a case study. We compared the carbon balance of four harvesting scenarios with increasing wood procurement intensity (from procuring sawtimber only to procuring sawtimber, pulpwood and biomass) to three scenarios of unharvested forests, two of which experienced natural disturbances. We modeled carbon fluxes over a 100-year simulation period, considering biogenic and fossil emissions from aboveground forest ecosystems, harvested wood products, and wood supply and manufacturing. We assessed the mitigation potential of procuring biomass to produce bioenergy in the form of stemwood, treetops (including branches) or pulpwood. We found that forest harvesting, regardless of the wood procurement intensity, offered limited carbon benefits compared to the referenced undisturbed mature stands in most cases. However, increasing wood procurement can reduce the carbon footprint of wood supply chains, with pulpwood identified as a key feedstock. Compared with harvesting roundwood for conventional industries only, procuring biomass for bioenergy is likely to increase carbon emissions unless it substitutes high-emission energy sources on markets or enhances the next-rotation stand yield, which seems achievable in the context we studied. Bioenergy displacement factors should range from 0.072 to 0.701 tonne of carbon emission reduction per tonne of carbon in the bioenergy product, depending on stand characteristics, biomass feedstock, and cutting cycle length. Our findings provide a foundation for assessing the GHG reduction potential of harvesting activities at a broader scale, considering varying feedstock recovery intensities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna Hollweg, Johanna Pausch, Finn Zajewski, Marianne Lauerer, Khatab Abdalla
Achieving European climate neutrality by 2050 will require an increase in energy production from renewable sources. Silage maize (Zea mays L.), the most commonly used crop in Germany, is increasingly subject to yield losses associated with soil degradation and nutrient depletion. The perennial cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) has emerged as an alternative to reduce nutrient losses, mainly nitrogen (N), while maintaining similar biomass production. A lysimeter experiment was conducted to evaluate N dynamics between plant, soil, and leaching for maize and cup plant under moderate drought and well-watered conditions over 4 years. After the first year of growth, cup plant had higher shoot and root biomass than maize regardless of the watering conditions (e.g., in 2021 mean shoot biomass of maize was 266 g m−1 compared to 2696 g m−1 of cup plant). Notably, moderate drought did not affect shoot biomass in either crop (except in 2021 and 2022 for the cup plant). The higher biomass production of the cup plant was associated with higher N concentration in the shoot tissue compared to maize, likely due to its more efficient soil N utilization. This result was further supported by the lower soil dissolved N concentration and a reduction of nitrate leaching of 88% in 2021 and by up to 99% in 2022 under cup plant compared to maize. A higher microbial biomass N under cup plant suggests enhanced N immobilization by microorganisms. This is further supported by a higher microbial C/N imbalance under cup plant than maize in 2022, indicating a stronger N relative to C limitation. Our results showed that cup plant can provide high shoot and root biomass and significantly reduced nitrate leaching, indicating its potential as an alternative to maize and thus as a bioenergy crop for environmental sustainability in a changing climate.
到2050年实现欧洲气候中和需要增加可再生能源的能源生产。青贮玉米(Zea mays L.)是德国最常用的作物,由于土壤退化和养分枯竭,其产量损失日益严重。多年生杯状植物松香(Silphium perfoliatum L.)已成为减少养分损失的替代选择,主要是氮(N),同时保持类似的生物量生产。采用蒸渗仪试验研究了中度干旱和丰水条件下玉米和杯形植株4年植株、土壤和淋滤间的氮动态。生长一年后,无论水分条件如何,杯状植株的茎部和根系生物量都高于玉米(例如,2021年玉米的平均茎部生物量为266 g m−1,而杯状植株的平均茎部生物量为2696 g m−1)。值得注意的是,中度干旱对两种作物的茎部生物量都没有影响(除了2021年和2022年的杯状植物)。与玉米相比,杯状植物较高的生物量产量与茎部组织中较高的氮浓度相关,可能是由于其更有效地利用土壤氮。与玉米相比,杯栽土壤溶解氮浓度较低,2021年和2022年硝酸盐淋失量分别减少88%和99%,进一步支持了这一结果。杯状植物下较高的微生物生物量表明微生物对氮的固定作用增强。2022年杯状植物的微生物C/N不平衡高于玉米,这进一步支持了这一点,表明相对于C限制,氮更强。我们的研究结果表明,杯状植物可以提供较高的茎和根生物量,并显著减少硝酸盐淋失,这表明它有潜力替代玉米,从而在不断变化的气候中成为环境可持续性的生物能源作物。
{"title":"Perennial Cup Plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) Outperforms Silage Maize (Zea mays L.) in Root Biomass and Nitrate Retention","authors":"Anna Hollweg, Johanna Pausch, Finn Zajewski, Marianne Lauerer, Khatab Abdalla","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70074","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Achieving European climate neutrality by 2050 will require an increase in energy production from renewable sources. Silage maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), the most commonly used crop in Germany, is increasingly subject to yield losses associated with soil degradation and nutrient depletion. The perennial cup plant (<i>Silphium perfoliatum</i> L.) has emerged as an alternative to reduce nutrient losses, mainly nitrogen (N), while maintaining similar biomass production. A lysimeter experiment was conducted to evaluate N dynamics between plant, soil, and leaching for maize and cup plant under moderate drought and well-watered conditions over 4 years. After the first year of growth, cup plant had higher shoot and root biomass than maize regardless of the watering conditions (e.g., in 2021 mean shoot biomass of maize was 266 g m<sup>−1</sup> compared to 2696 g m<sup>−1</sup> of cup plant). Notably, moderate drought did not affect shoot biomass in either crop (except in 2021 and 2022 for the cup plant). The higher biomass production of the cup plant was associated with higher N concentration in the shoot tissue compared to maize, likely due to its more efficient soil N utilization. This result was further supported by the lower soil dissolved N concentration and a reduction of nitrate leaching of 88% in 2021 and by up to 99% in 2022 under cup plant compared to maize. A higher microbial biomass N under cup plant suggests enhanced N immobilization by microorganisms. This is further supported by a higher microbial C/N imbalance under cup plant than maize in 2022, indicating a stronger N relative to C limitation. Our results showed that cup plant can provide high shoot and root biomass and significantly reduced nitrate leaching, indicating its potential as an alternative to maize and thus as a bioenergy crop for environmental sustainability in a changing climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Considering biochar's potential for carbon sequestration and healthy soils, this study evaluates the economic viability of biochar projects for private landowners in the southeastern United States. Our analysis incorporates biochar manufacturing (as a co-product) in existing paper mills, its transportation and application costs, along with federal incentives and carbon credit revenues (via carbon offset transactions with profit-sharing for landowners). Baseline economic analysis, with average parameters, found a modest net profit of approximately $242.5 per hectare (or about $12 per metric ton of biochar applied) for landowners. Economic simulations of 10000 scenarios incorporating randomized +/