Biological Bulletin最新文献

AbstractDespite the global ecological importance of climate change, controversy surrounds how oxygen affects the fate of aquatic ectotherms under warming. Disagreements extend to the nature of oxygen bioavailability and whether oxygen usually limits growth under warming, explaining smaller adult size. These controversies affect two influential hypotheses: gill oxygen limitation and oxygen- and capacity-limited thermal tolerance. Here, we promote deeper integration of physiological and evolutionary mechanisms. We first clarify the nature of oxygen bioavailability in water, developing a new mass-transfer model that can be adapted to compare warming impacts on organisms with different respiratory systems and flow regimes. By distinguishing aerobic energy costs of moving oxygen from environment to tissues from costs of all other functions, we predict a decline in energy-dependent fitness during hypoxia despite approximately constant total metabolic rate before reaching critically low environmental oxygen. A new measure of oxygen bioavailability that keeps costs of generating water convection constant predicts a higher thermal sensitivity of oxygen uptake in an amphipod model than do previous oxygen supply indices. More importantly, by incorporating size- and temperature-dependent costs of generating water flow, we propose that oxygen limitation at different body sizes and temperatures can be modeled mechanistically. We then report little evidence for oxygen limitation of growth and adult size under benign warming. Yet occasional oxygen limitation, we argue, may, along with other selective pressures, help maintain adaptive plastic responses to warming. Finally, we discuss how to overcome flaws in a commonly used growth model that undermine predictions of warming impacts.

AbstractCoral populations are declining worldwide as a result of increased environmental stressors, including disease. Coral health is greatly dependent on complex interactions between the host animal and its associated microbial symbionts. While relatively understudied, there is growing evidence that the coral microbiome contributes to the health and resilience of corals in a variety of ways, similar to more well-studied systems, such as the human microbiome. Many of these interactions are dependent upon the production and exchange of natural products, including antibacterial compounds, quorum-sensing molecules, internal signaling molecules, nutrients, and so on. While advances in sequencing, culturing, and metabolomic techniques have aided in moving forward the understanding of coral microbiome interactions, current sequence and metabolite databases are lacking, hindering detailed descriptions of the microbes and metabolites involved. This review focuses on the roles of coral microbiomes in health and disease processes of coral hosts, with special attention to the coral metabolome. We discuss what is currently known about the relationship between the coral microbiome and disease, of beneficial microbial products or services, and how the manipulation of the coral microbiome may chemically benefit the coral host against disease. Understanding coral microbiome-metabolome interactions is critical to assisting management, conservation, and restoration strategies.

AbstractSea star wasting-marked in a variety of sea star species as varying degrees of skin lesions followed by disintegration-recently caused one of the largest marine die-offs ever recorded on the west coast of North America, killing billions of sea stars. Despite the important ramifications this mortality had for coastal benthic ecosystems, such as increased abundance of prey, little is known about the causes of the disease or the mechanisms of its progression. Although there have been studies indicating a range of causal mechanisms, including viruses and environmental effects, the broad spatial and depth range of affected populations leaves many questions remaining about either infectious or non-infectious mechanisms. Wasting appears to start with degradation of mutable connective tissue in the body wall, leading to disintegration of the epidermis. Here, we briefly review basic sea star biology in the context of sea star wasting and present our current knowledge and hypotheses related to the symptoms, the microbiome, the viruses, and the associated environmental stressors. We also highlight throughout the article knowledge gaps and the data needed to better understand sea star wasting mechanistically, its causes, and potential management.

AbstractThe locomotion strategy of cephalopods is an important factor that influences their ability to exploit various oceanic environments. Particularly, Metasepia cuttlefish have a unique locomotion strategy; they prefer slow walking (ambling) on the seafloor over swimming. For this locomotion, they use their ventral arms as forelimbs and ambulatory flaps as hindlimbs. This locomotion is similar to the gait of quadruped vertebrates, where the forelimbs and hindlimbs on the left and right move alternately. The original description and some textbooks have considered these flaps to be muscular; however, this has not been proven. Here, we report the histological morphology of the ambulatory flaps of Metasepia tullbergi and their ambling locomotion. Histological observations indicated that the ambulatory flaps had a papillae structure comprising papillae musculature (dermal erector or retractor muscles) and connective tissue in the skin. Behavioral observations indicated that the ambulatory flaps changed their shape during ambling, which could explain the existence of the skin papillae. Our results suggest that ambulatory flaps are skin papillae, which can change shape by using their papillae musculature and connective tissue. This is a unique feature of Metasepia species that use the skin papillae for locomotion.

AbstractAccurate species delimitation is crucial to understanding biodiversity. In the northern Gulf of Mexico, recent genetic evidence has suggested that the tricolor Luidia lawrencei is not a species distinct from the gray Luidia clathrata. We collected Luidia specimens from Apalachee Bay, Florida, and morphologically identified 11 as L. clathrata and 16 as L. lawrencei. We sequenced 1074 bp of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and found ~14% divergence between L. clathrata and L. lawrencei, suggesting two distinct species (within-species divergence was <1%). Two specimens were phenotypically L. lawrencei (i.e., tricolor morph) but mitochondrially were L. clathrata. Our findings lend support to maintaining L. clathrata and L. lawrencei as distinct species. However, the species boundary between these two taxa may be porous, and ongoing hybridization may occur when the two species are found in sympatry. Future work with nuclear markers is warranted to determine the frequency of hybridization and the extent of introgression. Clarifying the genetic relationship between these species will provide a baseline for assessing ongoing changes in connectivity of these two highly abundant sea stars in the rapidly warming northern Gulf of Mexico.