Pub Date : 2025-09-26DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00217-8
Feifei Bu, Alexandra Burton, Naomi Launders, Amy E Taylor, Alvin Richards-Belle, Stephanie Tierney, David Osborn, Daisy Fancourt
Background
Social prescribing is growing rapidly in England and across the world. However, it remains unclear who it is reaching and how effectively it is being implemented. This study aimed to assess longitudinal trends in social prescribing in England's primary care system, including growth trajectories and target alignment, sociodemographic profiles of referred patients, and predictors of service refusal over time.
Methods
This nationwide, longitudinal observational study analysed primary care records from 1·2 million patients from 1736 general practitioner (GP) practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in England. We estimated social prescribing trends between 2019 and 2023 using growth curve modelling on social prescribing numbers at the practice level. Descriptive analyses were used to show changes in sociodemographic profiles of social prescribing patients over time. To assess sociodemographic disparities in service refusal (defined as having a medical code of social prescribing declined), we used multilevel logistic regression models stratified by year, accounting for nested data structure where patients were nested within practices.
Findings
As of the end of 2023, an estimated 9·4 million GP consultations in England have involved social prescribing codes, and 5·5 million consultations have specifically led to social prescribing referrals. In 2023 alone, an estimated 1·3 million patients were referred to social prescribing. 60% of patients offered social prescribing were female and 23% were from ethnic minority groups. Representation from patients living in more deprived areas increased from 23% to 42% between 2017 and 2023. Service refusal declined from 22% to 12% between 2019 and 2023. Age, sex, and ethnicity were associated with service refusal across multiple years. Notably, in 2023, all age groups had higher odds of refusal compared with the youngest age group. Female patients had 21% (95% CI 0·77–0·82) lower odds of refusal than males, and patients from White ethnic backgrounds had 32% (1·26–1·39) higher odds of refusal than ethnic minority patients.
Interpretation
Social prescribing has expanded rapidly in England, far exceeding initial targets of 900 000 patients by 2023–24, suggesting broad service acceptability. Progress is being made in reaching specific target groups, such as more deprived communities. However, there are still disparities in accessibility and uptake, calling for targeted strategies to address underlying inequalities.
Funding
MQ Transforming Mental Health, Rosetrees-Stoneygate Trust Fellowship, National Academy for Social Prescribing.
社会处方在英国和世界各地都在迅速增长。然而，目前尚不清楚它的目标是谁，以及它的执行效果如何。本研究旨在评估英国初级保健系统中社会处方的纵向趋势，包括增长轨迹和目标一致性，转诊患者的社会人口学概况，以及随着时间的推移拒绝服务的预测因素。方法：这项全国性的纵向观察性研究分析了英国临床实践研究数据链中来自1736名全科医生（GP）实践的120万名患者的初级保健记录。我们在实践层面使用社会处方数量的增长曲线模型估计了2019年至2023年的社会处方趋势。描述性分析用于显示社会处方患者的社会人口学特征随时间的变化。为了评估拒绝服务的社会人口差异（定义为有社会处方下降的医疗代码），我们使用了按年分层的多层次逻辑回归模型，考虑了嵌套的数据结构，其中患者嵌套在实践中。研究结果显示，截至2023年底，英格兰估计有940万次全科医生咨询涉及社会处方代码，550万次咨询专门涉及社会处方转诊。仅在2023年，估计就有130万患者转诊到社会处方。提供社会处方的患者中，女性占60%，少数民族占23%。2017年至2023年间，生活在更贫困地区的患者比例从23%增加到42%。2019年至2023年间，服务拒绝率从22%下降到12%。年龄、性别和种族与多年拒绝服务有关。值得注意的是，在2023年，与最年轻的年龄组相比，所有年龄组的拒绝率都更高。女性患者的拒绝率比男性低21% (95% CI 0.77 ~ 0.82)，白人患者的拒绝率比少数民族患者高32%（1.26 ~ 1.39）。社会处方在英格兰迅速扩张，到2023-24年远远超过最初的目标90万患者，这表明广泛的服务可接受性。在接触特定目标群体，例如较为贫困的社区方面正在取得进展。然而，在可及性和吸收方面仍然存在差距，需要制定有针对性的战略来解决潜在的不平等现象。资金mq转变心理健康，rosetree - stoneygate信托奖学金，国家社会处方学会。
{"title":"National roll-out of social prescribing in England's primary care system: a longitudinal observational study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink data","authors":"Feifei Bu, Alexandra Burton, Naomi Launders, Amy E Taylor, Alvin Richards-Belle, Stephanie Tierney, David Osborn, Daisy Fancourt","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00217-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00217-8","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Social prescribing is growing rapidly in England and across the world. However, it remains unclear who it is reaching and how effectively it is being implemented. This study aimed to assess longitudinal trends in social prescribing in England's primary care system, including growth trajectories and target alignment, sociodemographic profiles of referred patients, and predictors of service refusal over time.<h3>Methods</h3>This nationwide, longitudinal observational study analysed primary care records from 1·2 million patients from 1736 general practitioner (GP) practices in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in England. We estimated social prescribing trends between 2019 and 2023 using growth curve modelling on social prescribing numbers at the practice level. Descriptive analyses were used to show changes in sociodemographic profiles of social prescribing patients over time. To assess sociodemographic disparities in service refusal (defined as having a medical code of social prescribing declined), we used multilevel logistic regression models stratified by year, accounting for nested data structure where patients were nested within practices.<h3>Findings</h3>As of the end of 2023, an estimated 9·4 million GP consultations in England have involved social prescribing codes, and 5·5 million consultations have specifically led to social prescribing referrals. In 2023 alone, an estimated 1·3 million patients were referred to social prescribing. 60% of patients offered social prescribing were female and 23% were from ethnic minority groups. Representation from patients living in more deprived areas increased from 23% to 42% between 2017 and 2023. Service refusal declined from 22% to 12% between 2019 and 2023. Age, sex, and ethnicity were associated with service refusal across multiple years. Notably, in 2023, all age groups had higher odds of refusal compared with the youngest age group. Female patients had 21% (95% CI 0·77–0·82) lower odds of refusal than males, and patients from White ethnic backgrounds had 32% (1·26–1·39) higher odds of refusal than ethnic minority patients.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Social prescribing has expanded rapidly in England, far exceeding initial targets of 900 000 patients by 2023–24, suggesting broad service acceptability. Progress is being made in reaching specific target groups, such as more deprived communities. However, there are still disparities in accessibility and uptake, calling for targeted strategies to address underlying inequalities.<h3>Funding</h3>MQ Transforming Mental Health, Rosetrees-Stoneygate Trust Fellowship, National Academy for Social Prescribing.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145153669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00192-6
Gerry McCartney, Milena Büchs, Martin Hensher, Micaela Mazzei
The current polycrisis (intersecting and mutually-reinforcing crises that are impacting our ecological, social, and economic systems) has foregrounded the need to transform economies to put them in service of people and planet, rather than design them in pursuit of ever more economic growth. This approach, termed a Wellbeing Economy, is the subject of considerable policy interest and could have substantial impacts on population health if widely implemented. We discuss different interpretations of similar terms for economic systems and how these interpretations imply incremental reforms to the dominant capitalist model, or a radical break in economic design. We detail routes to a Wellbeing Economy and suggest that more radical approaches hold greater potential to address the polycrisis and protect population health. We summarise how the implementation of a Wellbeing Economy could be a commensurate response to the polycrisis that might also yield substantial benefits for population health.
{"title":"What is a Wellbeing Economy, and what might its impact be on population health?","authors":"Gerry McCartney, Milena Büchs, Martin Hensher, Micaela Mazzei","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00192-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00192-6","url":null,"abstract":"The current polycrisis (intersecting and mutually-reinforcing crises that are impacting our ecological, social, and economic systems) has foregrounded the need to transform economies to put them in service of people and planet, rather than design them in pursuit of ever more economic growth. This approach, termed a Wellbeing Economy, is the subject of considerable policy interest and could have substantial impacts on population health if widely implemented. We discuss different interpretations of similar terms for economic systems and how these interpretations imply incremental reforms to the dominant capitalist model, or a radical break in economic design. We detail routes to a Wellbeing Economy and suggest that more radical approaches hold greater potential to address the polycrisis and protect population health. We summarise how the implementation of a Wellbeing Economy could be a commensurate response to the polycrisis that might also yield substantial benefits for population health.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145116391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00194-x
Marta Pineda-Moncusí, Alexandros Rekkas, Álvaro Martínez Pérez, Angela Leis, Carlos Lopez Gomez, Eric Fey, Erwin Bruninx, Filip Maljković, Francisco Sánchez-Sáez, Jordi Rodeiro-Boliart, Loretta Zsuzsa Kiss, Michael Franz, Miguel-Angel Mayer, Neva Eleangovan, Pau Pericàs Pulido, Pantelis Natsiavas, Selçuk Şen, Steven Cooper, Sulev Reisberg, Katrin Manlik, Theresa Burkard
Background
Drug shortages can negatively impact patient care. We aimed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of use of medicines with shortages announced by the European Medicines Agency between January, 2013, and September, 2023, and to characterise the users of these drugs.
Methods
In this multinational network cohort study, we used routinely collected data from 52 databases across 18 European countries and the USA covering primary care, secondary care, health insurance claims, and disease registries. We included all participants with a minimum of 365 days of medical history between 2010 and 2024. We estimated annual incidence rates and period prevalence of use of medicines with a reported shortage (n=16), and their key alternatives (n=41). A reduction of 33% or more in incidence or prevalence after the shortage announcement was considered confirmation of a shortage. Additionally, we analysed changes in utilisation in terms of age, sex, indication, duration, and dosage.
Findings
Eight drugs had a 33% or higher reduction in incidence and nine drugs had a 33% or higher reduction in prevalence. Varenicline and amoxicillin (alone or combined with clavulanate) were the medicines affected in the highest number of countries and databases. Additionally, we observed changes in the indication of alteplase (pulmonary embolism indication increased in hospitals in Finland and Germany during the shortage period) and sarilumab (rheumatoid arthritis indication decreased in databases in the UK, Spain, Finland, and Sweden); and among incident users of sarilumab, a decrease in the cumulative dose was observed in databases in the Netherlands (from 84 mg in 2020 to 28 mg in 2023) and a reduction in treatment duration was observed in databases in Finland (from 104 days in 2020 to 1 day in 2022) and Belgium (from 71 days in 2020 to 30 days in 2022).
Interpretation
This study highlighted changes in incidence and prevalence of use of medicines after shortage announcements, and changes observed in patient care in terms of the indication, duration, or prescribed dose of medicines. Our findings showed that some reductions in use were observed across Europe and the USA, and others differed across countries. More research is needed to reduce the effects of drug shortages globally.
{"title":"Changes in use and utilisation patterns of drugs with reported shortages between 2010 and 2024 in Europe and North America: a network cohort study","authors":"Marta Pineda-Moncusí, Alexandros Rekkas, Álvaro Martínez Pérez, Angela Leis, Carlos Lopez Gomez, Eric Fey, Erwin Bruninx, Filip Maljković, Francisco Sánchez-Sáez, Jordi Rodeiro-Boliart, Loretta Zsuzsa Kiss, Michael Franz, Miguel-Angel Mayer, Neva Eleangovan, Pau Pericàs Pulido, Pantelis Natsiavas, Selçuk Şen, Steven Cooper, Sulev Reisberg, Katrin Manlik, Theresa Burkard","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00194-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00194-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Drug shortages can negatively impact patient care. We aimed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of use of medicines with shortages announced by the European Medicines Agency between January, 2013, and September, 2023, and to characterise the users of these drugs.<h3>Methods</h3>In this multinational network cohort study, we used routinely collected data from 52 databases across 18 European countries and the USA covering primary care, secondary care, health insurance claims, and disease registries. We included all participants with a minimum of 365 days of medical history between 2010 and 2024. We estimated annual incidence rates and period prevalence of use of medicines with a reported shortage (n=16), and their key alternatives (n=41). A reduction of 33% or more in incidence or prevalence after the shortage announcement was considered confirmation of a shortage. Additionally, we analysed changes in utilisation in terms of age, sex, indication, duration, and dosage.<h3>Findings</h3>Eight drugs had a 33% or higher reduction in incidence and nine drugs had a 33% or higher reduction in prevalence. Varenicline and amoxicillin (alone or combined with clavulanate) were the medicines affected in the highest number of countries and databases. Additionally, we observed changes in the indication of alteplase (pulmonary embolism indication increased in hospitals in Finland and Germany during the shortage period) and sarilumab (rheumatoid arthritis indication decreased in databases in the UK, Spain, Finland, and Sweden); and among incident users of sarilumab, a decrease in the cumulative dose was observed in databases in the Netherlands (from 84 mg in 2020 to 28 mg in 2023) and a reduction in treatment duration was observed in databases in Finland (from 104 days in 2020 to 1 day in 2022) and Belgium (from 71 days in 2020 to 30 days in 2022).<h3>Interpretation</h3>This study highlighted changes in incidence and prevalence of use of medicines after shortage announcements, and changes observed in patient care in terms of the indication, duration, or prescribed dose of medicines. Our findings showed that some reductions in use were observed across Europe and the USA, and others differed across countries. More research is needed to reduce the effects of drug shortages globally.<h3>Funding</h3>Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145116390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00218-x
Michael R M Abrigo
With ultra-processed food consumption increasing, the question confronting policy makers is no longer whether unhealthy diet is a major health risk, but what to do about it. In The Lancet Public Health, Akshar Saxena and colleagues1 offer a compelling answer: tax unhealthy foods.
{"title":"Taxing unhealthy foods: a Philippine case for food policy reform","authors":"Michael R M Abrigo","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00218-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00218-x","url":null,"abstract":"With ultra-processed food consumption increasing, the question confronting policy makers is no longer whether unhealthy diet is a major health risk, but what to do about it. In <em>The Lancet Public Health</em>, Akshar Saxena and colleagues<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> offer a compelling answer: tax unhealthy foods.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145116338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00229-4
Housing is a fundamental human right. Yet, UN Habitat estimates that 2·8 billion people around the world face some form of housing inadequacy, 1 billion people live in informal settlements and slums, and 300 million people are homeless. Adequate, safe, and affordable housing is not a luxury. The Sustainable Development Goal target 11.1—ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums by 2030—is clear, and the next 5 years will be crucial for countries to meet their targets. Housing is increasingly recognised as a determinant of health and wellbeing, yet governments are slow to act and poor housing remains a substantial challenge and a threat to public health in many countries.
{"title":"Housing: a determinant of health and equity","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00229-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00229-4","url":null,"abstract":"Housing is a fundamental human right. Yet, <span><span>UN Habitat</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span> estimates that 2·8 billion people around the world face some form of housing inadequacy, 1 billion people live in informal settlements and slums, and 300 million people are homeless. Adequate, safe, and affordable housing is not a luxury. The Sustainable Development Goal target 11.1—ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums by 2030—is clear, and the next 5 years will be crucial for countries to meet their targets. Housing is increasingly recognised as a determinant of health and wellbeing, yet governments are slow to act and poor housing remains a substantial challenge and a threat to public health in many countries.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145116393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-12DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00142-2
Rebecca Bentley, Kate Mason, David Jacobs, Tony Blakely, Philippa Howden-Chapman, Ang Li, Gary Adamkiewicz, Aaron Reeves
Housing is a key social determinant of health. Healthy housing is affordable, suitable, and secure. It is characterised by warmth, dryness, and proper ventilation; free from hazards such as mould and toxins; accessible to occupants with functional limitations; and provides foundational security. Conversely, exposure to unhealthy home environments can negatively affect respiratory and cardiovascular health, mental wellbeing, infectious disease transmission, and injury risk. Housing-focused health interventions and programmes offer a unique opportunity to bridge the gap between housing and health, potentially leading to improved population health outcomes across various domains. This Series paper integrates contemporary understanding of housing and housing systems into a social and economic determinants framework. We illustrate how housing systems contribute to poor health outcomes and health inequalities, providing a foundation for exploring housing's potential to support health across jurisdictions globally. Although our framework can be used to examine the relationship between specific housing hazards (eg, mould, cold, or heat) and health, its primary focus is on understanding how these hazards are generated and distributed through characteristics of the housing system (eg, building codes or housing finance). By addressing these housing system determinants, we propose an alternative approach to achieving healthier housing. This framework aims to support the strategic use of housing to promote good health for all populations.
{"title":"Housing as a social determinant of health: a contemporary framework","authors":"Rebecca Bentley, Kate Mason, David Jacobs, Tony Blakely, Philippa Howden-Chapman, Ang Li, Gary Adamkiewicz, Aaron Reeves","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00142-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00142-2","url":null,"abstract":"Housing is a key social determinant of health. Healthy housing is affordable, suitable, and secure. It is characterised by warmth, dryness, and proper ventilation; free from hazards such as mould and toxins; accessible to occupants with functional limitations; and provides foundational security. Conversely, exposure to unhealthy home environments can negatively affect respiratory and cardiovascular health, mental wellbeing, infectious disease transmission, and injury risk. Housing-focused health interventions and programmes offer a unique opportunity to bridge the gap between housing and health, potentially leading to improved population health outcomes across various domains. This Series paper integrates contemporary understanding of housing and housing systems into a social and economic determinants framework. We illustrate how housing systems contribute to poor health outcomes and health inequalities, providing a foundation for exploring housing's potential to support health across jurisdictions globally. Although our framework can be used to examine the relationship between specific housing hazards (eg, mould, cold, or heat) and health, its primary focus is on understanding how these hazards are generated and distributed through characteristics of the housing system (eg, building codes or housing finance). By addressing these housing system determinants, we propose an alternative approach to achieving healthier housing. This framework aims to support the strategic use of housing to promote good health for all populations.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145043095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-12DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00141-0
Ang Li, Mathew Toll, Ralph Chapman, Philippa Howden-Chapman, Diana Hernández, Holly Samuelson, Alistair Woodward, Rebecca Bentley
Anthropogenic climate change is causing rapid shifts in temperature and weather patterns, both in location and intensity, making living conditions increasingly hazardous. This complicates housing's frontline role in protecting human health. When housing systems fail to provide universal access to secure, affordable, and suitable housing, social and health inequalities related to climate change are amplified. The location, construction, and operation of homes influence greenhouse gas emissions and must be improved to reduce their environmental impacts. This paper, the second in a Series on housing as a social determinant of health, builds a framework for conceptualising the interactions between housing, climate, and health. It identifies the pathways through which climate change affects housing and exacerbates health risks, and reflects on policy responses for climate resilience in housing and health.
{"title":"Housing at the intersection of health and climate change","authors":"Ang Li, Mathew Toll, Ralph Chapman, Philippa Howden-Chapman, Diana Hernández, Holly Samuelson, Alistair Woodward, Rebecca Bentley","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00141-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00141-0","url":null,"abstract":"Anthropogenic climate change is causing rapid shifts in temperature and weather patterns, both in location and intensity, making living conditions increasingly hazardous. This complicates housing's frontline role in protecting human health. When housing systems fail to provide universal access to secure, affordable, and suitable housing, social and health inequalities related to climate change are amplified. The location, construction, and operation of homes influence greenhouse gas emissions and must be improved to reduce their environmental impacts. This paper, the second in a Series on housing as a social determinant of health, builds a framework for conceptualising the interactions between housing, climate, and health. It identifies the pathways through which climate change affects housing and exacerbates health risks, and reflects on policy responses for climate resilience in housing and health.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145043093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-12DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00197-5
Jesse Lloyd Goldshear, Tina Kempin Reuter, Ricky N Bluthenthal, Annick Borquez
The USA is currently experiencing multiple overlapping economic and public health crises: rising costs of housing, increased homelessness, and record drug overdose mortality. In many urban areas, people who are homeless have become increasingly visible, often congregating in so-called encampments. The public reaction and policy response to this increased visibility has been largely punitive and carceral. Jurisdictions across the USA have adopted policies of forced displacement, often carried out by law enforcement officers and sanitation workers, and enforced via threat of fines, arrest, or both. The widespread adoption of these policies—especially given the 2024 US Supreme Court decision (City of Grants Pass v Johnson)—represents a violation of international human rights law. Public health professionals should use the framework of international human rights to fight against these harmful policies.
美国目前正经历多重重叠的经济和公共卫生危机：住房成本上升，无家可归者增加，以及创纪录的药物过量死亡率。在许多城市地区，无家可归的人越来越多，他们经常聚集在所谓的营地。公众的反应和政策对这种日益增加的能见度的反应在很大程度上是惩罚性的和冷漠的。美国各地的司法管辖区都采取了强迫流离失所的政策，通常由执法人员和环卫工人执行，并通过罚款、逮捕或两者兼而有之的威胁来执行。这些政策的广泛采用——尤其是考虑到2024年美国最高法院的判决（City of Grants Pass v Johnson）——违反了国际人权法。公共卫生专业人员应利用国际人权框架来反对这些有害的政策。
{"title":"Displacement, health outcomes, and the human rights of people experiencing homelessness in the USA","authors":"Jesse Lloyd Goldshear, Tina Kempin Reuter, Ricky N Bluthenthal, Annick Borquez","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00197-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00197-5","url":null,"abstract":"The USA is currently experiencing multiple overlapping economic and public health crises: rising costs of housing, increased homelessness, and record drug overdose mortality. In many urban areas, people who are homeless have become increasingly visible, often congregating in so-called encampments. The public reaction and policy response to this increased visibility has been largely punitive and carceral. Jurisdictions across the USA have adopted policies of forced displacement, often carried out by law enforcement officers and sanitation workers, and enforced via threat of fines, arrest, or both. The widespread adoption of these policies—especially given the 2024 US Supreme Court decision (<em>City of Grants Pass v Johnson</em>)—represents a violation of international human rights law. Public health professionals should use the framework of international human rights to fight against these harmful policies.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145043728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-11DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00202-6
Paul M Galdas, Zac E Seidler, John L Oliffe
Despite growing awareness of gendered health inequalities, men remain under-represented in public health policy and practice. They have shorter life expectancy, higher preventable mortality, and lower engagement with health services compared with women, especially among groups living in marginalising conditions. To support system-level responses, we propose the 5R Framework (Research, Reach, Respond, Retain, and Relational) to guide the development of gender-responsive health systems. Each component offers direction for addressing men's needs through inclusive data, targeted engagement, tailored care, sustained participation, and equity-driven policy. The 5R Framework builds on earlier work for programme design by applying gender-transformative principles at a system level. The 5R Framework offers a strategic model for translating evidence into scalable, equitable policy and service reform.
{"title":"Designing men's health policy: the 5R Framework","authors":"Paul M Galdas, Zac E Seidler, John L Oliffe","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00202-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00202-6","url":null,"abstract":"Despite growing awareness of gendered health inequalities, men remain under-represented in public health policy and practice. They have shorter life expectancy, higher preventable mortality, and lower engagement with health services compared with women, especially among groups living in marginalising conditions. To support system-level responses, we propose the 5R Framework (Research, Reach, Respond, Retain, and Relational) to guide the development of gender-responsive health systems. Each component offers direction for addressing men's needs through inclusive data, targeted engagement, tailored care, sustained participation, and equity-driven policy. The 5R Framework builds on earlier work for programme design by applying gender-transformative principles at a system level. The 5R Framework offers a strategic model for translating evidence into scalable, equitable policy and service reform.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145043235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00196-3
David Francis Hunt, Hazel Banks, Daniel K Y Kan, Phil Ruthen, Felicity Thomas, Geoff Wong
The UK Government is currently developing the country's first national strategy on men's mental health.1 Male suicide is a priority—rightly so, given men account for approximately 75% of suicide deaths globally.2 WHO has identified male suicide as a crucial but under-addressed public health issue.2
{"title":"Men's mental health: we need systems, not symbols","authors":"David Francis Hunt, Hazel Banks, Daniel K Y Kan, Phil Ruthen, Felicity Thomas, Geoff Wong","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00196-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(25)00196-3","url":null,"abstract":"The UK Government is currently developing the country's first national strategy on men's mental health.<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> Male suicide is a priority—rightly so, given men account for approximately 75% of suicide deaths globally.<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span> WHO has identified male suicide as a crucial but under-addressed public health issue.<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span>","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145043128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：