Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.008
Nicolas Bourgon, Elsa Kermorvant-Duchemin, Alexandre Lapillonne, Yves Ville
Objectives: To evaluate trends in continued pregnancies following a prenatal diagnosis of severe fetal conditions eligible for termination under French law, as well as the associated perinatal outcome.
Methods: We conducted a time-series analysis from 2008 to 2022 using public data from the French National Institute of Statistics and the Biomedicine Agency. Indicators, expressed per 1000 live births, included the number of severe fetal conditions identified antenatally, authorizations for termination of pregnancy, continued pregnancies, overall neonatal mortality, and pregnancy outcomes in case of continuation.
Results: Between 2008 and 2022, the number of severe fetal conditions identified antenatally increased from 8.70 to 12.09 per 1000 live births. Over the same period, the rate of continued pregnancies rose from 0.60 to 2.69 per 1000 live births. This increase was significantly less pronounced than the overall rise in severe fetal conditions diagnosed antenatally (P<0.001). Among continued pregnancies, the proportion of neonates alive at day 28 increased. Neonatal mortality following pregnancy continuation also increased, but at a slower rate than pregnancy continuation, without a specific contribution to the overall trend in neonatal mortality.
Conclusions: Our findings highlight an evolution in pregnancy outcomes following prenatal diagnosis of severe fetal conditions, raising major clinical, ethical, and organizational challenges, and underscoring the need to strengthen perinatal indicators to better inform public health policies.
{"title":"[Continuation of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis of fetal conditions: Evolution and implications].","authors":"Nicolas Bourgon, Elsa Kermorvant-Duchemin, Alexandre Lapillonne, Yves Ville","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate trends in continued pregnancies following a prenatal diagnosis of severe fetal conditions eligible for termination under French law, as well as the associated perinatal outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a time-series analysis from 2008 to 2022 using public data from the French National Institute of Statistics and the Biomedicine Agency. Indicators, expressed per 1000 live births, included the number of severe fetal conditions identified antenatally, authorizations for termination of pregnancy, continued pregnancies, overall neonatal mortality, and pregnancy outcomes in case of continuation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2008 and 2022, the number of severe fetal conditions identified antenatally increased from 8.70 to 12.09 per 1000 live births. Over the same period, the rate of continued pregnancies rose from 0.60 to 2.69 per 1000 live births. This increase was significantly less pronounced than the overall rise in severe fetal conditions diagnosed antenatally (P<0.001). Among continued pregnancies, the proportion of neonates alive at day 28 increased. Neonatal mortality following pregnancy continuation also increased, but at a slower rate than pregnancy continuation, without a specific contribution to the overall trend in neonatal mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight an evolution in pregnancy outcomes following prenatal diagnosis of severe fetal conditions, raising major clinical, ethical, and organizational challenges, and underscoring the need to strengthen perinatal indicators to better inform public health policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.009
Diane Le Bris, Christine Devalland, Marc Puyraveau, Charlotte Bourgoin, Elodie Bouvier, Catherine Gay
Objective: To analyze the clinical and cyto-histological evolution of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) with the use of fractional carbon dioxide laser.
Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical trial at the Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Trévenans, France, over a period of 19 months from 2022 to 2023. The patients enrolled were women over 40 years old, postmenopausal with vaginal symptoms of GSM. The primary outcome was the comparison of the clinical symptom intensity score before and after the three laser sessions. The secondary outcomes were the evolution of GSM with laser treatment through a clinical score, a medical score, the assessment of the sexual quality of life, the study of the cytological and histological effects of the laser, and its side effects.
Results: Among the 75 patients enrolled, 68 have been studied. There was a significant improvement of all the symptoms, the medical score and the sexual quality of life after three laser sessions (P<0.01). In cytology, there was an improvement in the vaginal maturation value with an increase in superficial cells and a decrease in basal cells (P<0.01). Histologically, there was an increase in the thickness of the epithelium (P<0.01), the size of the epithelial cells (P=0.01), and the glycogen (P<0.01), and a decrease in the thickness of the basal layers (P<0.01).
Conclusion: Fractional carbon dioxide laser improves symptoms of GSM, sexual quality of life and restores the characteristics of the vaginal epithelium with effects still present six months after.
{"title":"[Clinical and histological evaluation of fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause].","authors":"Diane Le Bris, Christine Devalland, Marc Puyraveau, Charlotte Bourgoin, Elodie Bouvier, Catherine Gay","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the clinical and cyto-histological evolution of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) with the use of fractional carbon dioxide laser.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective clinical trial at the Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, Trévenans, France, over a period of 19 months from 2022 to 2023. The patients enrolled were women over 40 years old, postmenopausal with vaginal symptoms of GSM. The primary outcome was the comparison of the clinical symptom intensity score before and after the three laser sessions. The secondary outcomes were the evolution of GSM with laser treatment through a clinical score, a medical score, the assessment of the sexual quality of life, the study of the cytological and histological effects of the laser, and its side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 75 patients enrolled, 68 have been studied. There was a significant improvement of all the symptoms, the medical score and the sexual quality of life after three laser sessions (P<0.01). In cytology, there was an improvement in the vaginal maturation value with an increase in superficial cells and a decrease in basal cells (P<0.01). Histologically, there was an increase in the thickness of the epithelium (P<0.01), the size of the epithelial cells (P=0.01), and the glycogen (P<0.01), and a decrease in the thickness of the basal layers (P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fractional carbon dioxide laser improves symptoms of GSM, sexual quality of life and restores the characteristics of the vaginal epithelium with effects still present six months after.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.007
Clémentine Langin, Jeanne Bonnin, Anne Legrand, Laetitia Roussel, Marie Accoceberry, Céline Houlle, Fanny Petillon, Marion Rouzaire, Denis Gallot
Objective: To evaluate the relevance of the "red code" caesarean section indication using the relevance grid developed by the Grenoble team.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective two-phase relevance review in a type 3 maternity hospital. "Red code" caesarean sections were identified via the shared medical record, and their indications were discussed by a pair of practitioners and then with the entire obstetric team. Validation rates were compared before and after team awareness (phase 1 [2022-2023] versus phase 2 [July-December 2024]) using a Fisher's exact test.
Results: In phase 1, 109 caesarean sections were recorded, with 74% validated and 26% reclassified as "orange code". The main reasons for reclassification were excessive interpretation of fetal heart rate abnormalities and instrumental birth failure. In phase 2, of 22 caesarean sections identified, 21 (95.5%) were confirmed as "red code", indicating a significant improvement in the relevance rate (P=0.04).
Conclusion: The relevance review showed a significant improvement in the relevance of "red code" caesarean sections, thereby limiting over-reliance on this practice, a source of general anaesthesia and post-traumatic stress.
{"title":"[Improving the appropriateness of red code C-sections through a relevance review].","authors":"Clémentine Langin, Jeanne Bonnin, Anne Legrand, Laetitia Roussel, Marie Accoceberry, Céline Houlle, Fanny Petillon, Marion Rouzaire, Denis Gallot","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the relevance of the \"red code\" caesarean section indication using the relevance grid developed by the Grenoble team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective two-phase relevance review in a type 3 maternity hospital. \"Red code\" caesarean sections were identified via the shared medical record, and their indications were discussed by a pair of practitioners and then with the entire obstetric team. Validation rates were compared before and after team awareness (phase 1 [2022-2023] versus phase 2 [July-December 2024]) using a Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In phase 1, 109 caesarean sections were recorded, with 74% validated and 26% reclassified as \"orange code\". The main reasons for reclassification were excessive interpretation of fetal heart rate abnormalities and instrumental birth failure. In phase 2, of 22 caesarean sections identified, 21 (95.5%) were confirmed as \"red code\", indicating a significant improvement in the relevance rate (P=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The relevance review showed a significant improvement in the relevance of \"red code\" caesarean sections, thereby limiting over-reliance on this practice, a source of general anaesthesia and post-traumatic stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-17DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.006
Imane Ben M'Barek, Emilia Holmström, Pierre-François Ceccaldi, Juliette Michel, Juliette Vitrou, Erwan Le Pennec, Julien Stirnemann
Cardiotocography (CTG) is defined as the simultaneous recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions. It is used worldwide during labour to assess foetal well-being and to detect early signs of hypoxia. However, its interpretation relies mainly on visual assessment by clinicians based on standardized guidelines. This subjective evaluation is associated with substantial inter-observer variability, which continues to fuel debate regarding the actual effectiveness of cardiotocographic monitoring during the peripartum period. From the 1980s onward, researchers and clinicians began developing computerized systems to assist professionals in CTG interpretation. However, these decision-support tools have not yet convincingly demonstrated their ability to improve diagnostic performance or, more importantly, perinatal outcomes. Over the past decade, the availability of large clinical databases and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the development of models capable of analysing CTG signals and predicting the risk of foetal hypoxia. These systems have shown promising performance in identifying pathological situations when evaluated on retrospective cohorts. Nevertheless, several important challenges must be addressed before considering their integration into clinical practice. It is essential to develop and share large, multicentric, open databases that allow the training of robust, representative, and generalizable models. Furthermore, these systems must be embedded within a structured care protocol to ensure consistent and operational use in clinical settings.
{"title":"[Computerized intrapartum cardiotocography: Current evidence, controversies, and future directions].","authors":"Imane Ben M'Barek, Emilia Holmström, Pierre-François Ceccaldi, Juliette Michel, Juliette Vitrou, Erwan Le Pennec, Julien Stirnemann","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiotocography (CTG) is defined as the simultaneous recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions. It is used worldwide during labour to assess foetal well-being and to detect early signs of hypoxia. However, its interpretation relies mainly on visual assessment by clinicians based on standardized guidelines. This subjective evaluation is associated with substantial inter-observer variability, which continues to fuel debate regarding the actual effectiveness of cardiotocographic monitoring during the peripartum period. From the 1980s onward, researchers and clinicians began developing computerized systems to assist professionals in CTG interpretation. However, these decision-support tools have not yet convincingly demonstrated their ability to improve diagnostic performance or, more importantly, perinatal outcomes. Over the past decade, the availability of large clinical databases and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the development of models capable of analysing CTG signals and predicting the risk of foetal hypoxia. These systems have shown promising performance in identifying pathological situations when evaluated on retrospective cohorts. Nevertheless, several important challenges must be addressed before considering their integration into clinical practice. It is essential to develop and share large, multicentric, open databases that allow the training of robust, representative, and generalizable models. Furthermore, these systems must be embedded within a structured care protocol to ensure consistent and operational use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146004774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.005
Jeanne Sibiude, Charles Garabedian, Yoann Athiel, Hanane Bouchghoul, Claire Colmant, Perrine Coste Mazeau, Paul Jabert, Lola Loussert, Jean-Christophe Rozé, Madeleine Santraine, Nicolas Sananès, Christophe Vayssière
<p><p>In France, the rate of twin deliveries is estimated at 1.6% of all births. These recommendations address the gestational age at delivery and the mode of delivery for twin pregnancies. They were developed using the GRADE methodology, with questions formulated according to the PICO framework. Regarding gestational age at delivery, in cases of uncomplicated dichorionic diamniotic pregnancies, it is recommended to plan delivery between 37 weeks and 0 days and 38 weeks and 6 days of gestation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). In cases of uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies, it is recommended to plan delivery between 36 weeks and 0 day and 37 weeks and 6 days of gestation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). Finally, in cases of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic pregnancies, it is recommended to plan delivery between 33 weeks and 0 day and 34 weeks and 6 days of gestation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). Regarding the mode of delivery for diamniotic twin pregnancies, when the first twin is in cephalic presentation and the gestational age is 32 weeks or more, a planned vaginal birth is recommended (strong recommendation, high-quality evidence). When the first twin is in breech presentation and the gestational age is 32 weeks or more, it is recommended to offer either a trial of vaginal birth or a scheduled cesarean section; the expert group suggests favoring a trial of vaginal birth when all eligibility criteria are met (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). In monoamniotic twin pregnancies, the available data are insufficient in both quantity and quality to issue a recommendation regarding a trial of vaginal birth compared with a scheduled cesarean section (no recommendation, very low-quality evidence). It is recommended to offer labor induction rather than a scheduled cesarean section when delivery is indicated at 32 weeks or more and the first twin is in cephalic presentation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). Regarding the delivery of the second twin, in vaginal births at 32 weeks or more with the second twin in cephalic presentation, it is recommended to perform either internal version or resumption of pushing efforts, with artificial rupture of membranes with or without oxytocin (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). When the second twin is in breech presentation, total breech extraction is recommended rather than resumption of pushing efforts (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). In diamniotic twin pregnancies with spontaneous labor before 32 weeks and with the first twin in cephalic presentation, it is recommended to offer a trial of vaginal birth rather than systematic cesarean section (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). The available data are insufficient in both quantity and quality to issue a recommendation regarding a trial of vaginal birth compared with systematic cesarean section in cases of spontaneous labor before 32
{"title":"[Delivery of twin pregnancies: Guidelines from the College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians].","authors":"Jeanne Sibiude, Charles Garabedian, Yoann Athiel, Hanane Bouchghoul, Claire Colmant, Perrine Coste Mazeau, Paul Jabert, Lola Loussert, Jean-Christophe Rozé, Madeleine Santraine, Nicolas Sananès, Christophe Vayssière","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In France, the rate of twin deliveries is estimated at 1.6% of all births. These recommendations address the gestational age at delivery and the mode of delivery for twin pregnancies. They were developed using the GRADE methodology, with questions formulated according to the PICO framework. Regarding gestational age at delivery, in cases of uncomplicated dichorionic diamniotic pregnancies, it is recommended to plan delivery between 37 weeks and 0 days and 38 weeks and 6 days of gestation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). In cases of uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies, it is recommended to plan delivery between 36 weeks and 0 day and 37 weeks and 6 days of gestation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). Finally, in cases of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic pregnancies, it is recommended to plan delivery between 33 weeks and 0 day and 34 weeks and 6 days of gestation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). Regarding the mode of delivery for diamniotic twin pregnancies, when the first twin is in cephalic presentation and the gestational age is 32 weeks or more, a planned vaginal birth is recommended (strong recommendation, high-quality evidence). When the first twin is in breech presentation and the gestational age is 32 weeks or more, it is recommended to offer either a trial of vaginal birth or a scheduled cesarean section; the expert group suggests favoring a trial of vaginal birth when all eligibility criteria are met (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). In monoamniotic twin pregnancies, the available data are insufficient in both quantity and quality to issue a recommendation regarding a trial of vaginal birth compared with a scheduled cesarean section (no recommendation, very low-quality evidence). It is recommended to offer labor induction rather than a scheduled cesarean section when delivery is indicated at 32 weeks or more and the first twin is in cephalic presentation (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). Regarding the delivery of the second twin, in vaginal births at 32 weeks or more with the second twin in cephalic presentation, it is recommended to perform either internal version or resumption of pushing efforts, with artificial rupture of membranes with or without oxytocin (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). When the second twin is in breech presentation, total breech extraction is recommended rather than resumption of pushing efforts (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence). In diamniotic twin pregnancies with spontaneous labor before 32 weeks and with the first twin in cephalic presentation, it is recommended to offer a trial of vaginal birth rather than systematic cesarean section (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). The available data are insufficient in both quantity and quality to issue a recommendation regarding a trial of vaginal birth compared with systematic cesarean section in cases of spontaneous labor before 32","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145991640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-10DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.003
Perrine Salmon, Lola Loussert, Géraldine Gascoin, Corinne Assouline, Damien Dubois, Paul Guerby, Louis Paret-Perinelli
Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing intrauterine infections in patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes from 37 weeks of gestation, with a negative group B Streptococcus PCR test.
Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, before-and-after cohort study conducted in a type 3 French maternity unit. We included women who delivered at ≥37 weeks of gestation with rupture of membranes lasting more than 12 hours and a negative PCR screening for vaginal Group B Streptococcus colonization. Patients (n=830) in the "antibiotic prophylaxis protocol" group received prophylactic PENICILLIN G starting 18 hours after membrane rupture. Patients (n=682) in the "no antibiotic prophylaxis protocol" group received no antibiotics. Intrauterine infection was defined as a temperature >38°C lasting more than 30 minutes or >38.5°C, combined with at least two of the following criteria: fetal tachycardia, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, or pelvic pain under epidural anesthesia.
Results: A total of 1,512 patients were included. The rate of intrauterine infection was significantly lower in the "antibiotic prophylaxis protocol" group compared to the "no prophylaxis protocol" group (1.33% vs. 3.96%, p=0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding postpartum endometritis or early-onset neonatal bacterial infection.
Conclusions: Administering antibiotic prophylaxis starting 18 hours after membrane rupture in term patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes and a negative Group B Streptococcus screening appears to reduce the rate of intrauterine infection.
目的:主要目的是评估从妊娠37周开始,B组链球菌PCR检测阴性的足月产前胎膜破裂患者应用抗生素预防宫内感染的效果。方法:这是一项回顾性、单中心、前后队列研究,在法国一家3型产科进行。我们纳入了妊娠≥37周分娩且胎膜破裂持续时间超过12小时且阴道B群链球菌定植PCR筛查阴性的妇女。“抗生素预防方案”组患者(n=830)在膜破裂后18小时开始预防性使用青霉素G。“无抗生素预防方案”组患者(n=682)未使用抗生素。宫内感染定义为温度>38°C持续30分钟以上或>38.5°C,并伴有以下至少两项标准:胎儿心动过快、羊水粪染色或硬膜外麻醉下盆腔疼痛。结果:共纳入1512例患者。“抗生素预防方案”组宫内感染发生率明显低于“无预防方案”组(1.33% vs. 3.96%, p=0.001)。两组在产后子宫内膜炎或新生儿早发性细菌感染方面无显著差异。结论:对足月产前胎膜破裂和B组链球菌筛查阴性的足月患者在胎膜破裂后18小时开始给予抗生素预防似乎可以降低宫内感染的发生率。
{"title":"[Prolonged membrane rupture at term: benefits of antibioprophylaxis for reducing intrauterine infection in the absence of streptococcus B].","authors":"Perrine Salmon, Lola Loussert, Géraldine Gascoin, Corinne Assouline, Damien Dubois, Paul Guerby, Louis Paret-Perinelli","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing intrauterine infections in patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes from 37 weeks of gestation, with a negative group B Streptococcus PCR test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center, before-and-after cohort study conducted in a type 3 French maternity unit. We included women who delivered at ≥37 weeks of gestation with rupture of membranes lasting more than 12 hours and a negative PCR screening for vaginal Group B Streptococcus colonization. Patients (n=830) in the \"antibiotic prophylaxis protocol\" group received prophylactic PENICILLIN G starting 18 hours after membrane rupture. Patients (n=682) in the \"no antibiotic prophylaxis protocol\" group received no antibiotics. Intrauterine infection was defined as a temperature >38°C lasting more than 30 minutes or >38.5°C, combined with at least two of the following criteria: fetal tachycardia, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, or pelvic pain under epidural anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,512 patients were included. The rate of intrauterine infection was significantly lower in the \"antibiotic prophylaxis protocol\" group compared to the \"no prophylaxis protocol\" group (1.33% vs. 3.96%, p=0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding postpartum endometritis or early-onset neonatal bacterial infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Administering antibiotic prophylaxis starting 18 hours after membrane rupture in term patients with term prelabor rupture of membranes and a negative Group B Streptococcus screening appears to reduce the rate of intrauterine infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-06DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.002
Jeanne Sibiude, Nicolas Mottet, Tiphaine Raia-Barjat, Paul Berveiller, Louise Ghesquières, Maela Le Lous, Alexandre Vivanti, Olivier Morel, Hugo Madar
The Obstetrics Committee of the CNGOF, consulted by the CNP GOGM at the request of the ANSM, has reviewed the safety of obstetric vacuum extraction. Instrumental delivery may be performed to shorten the expulsive phase, particularly in cases of fetal heart rate deceleration. The available instruments are the vacuum, forceps, and spatulas, with the choice depending on the clinical situation and the operator. In France, approximately 12% of births involve instrumental assistance, a rate that has remained stable since 2016. The vacuum is used in about two-thirds of these cases - a proportion similar to that observed in most European countries and in Canada, but higher than in the United States. The vacuum works by creating suction on the fetal scalp, allowing controlled and safe traction. Maternal complications (perineal trauma, hemorrhage) and neonatal complications (notably intracranial hemorrhage) are rare and comparable to those observed in cesarean deliveries performed during labor. Epidemiological studies do not show an increased risk of neurological impairment or long-term sequelae in children born by vacuum extraction. Compared with forceps, vacuum extraction is associated with reduced maternal morbidity, particularly a lower risk of anal sphincter injury, with no significant difference in overall neonatal outcomes, except for a slightly higher risk of cephalohematoma or jaundice. No difference has been observed according to operator experience. In conclusion, vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, which is a technique among the methods recommended by the CNGOF, represents a relevant alternative to cesarean section at full cervical dilation.
{"title":"[CNGOF statement on instrumental vaginal deliveries using vacuum extraction].","authors":"Jeanne Sibiude, Nicolas Mottet, Tiphaine Raia-Barjat, Paul Berveiller, Louise Ghesquières, Maela Le Lous, Alexandre Vivanti, Olivier Morel, Hugo Madar","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.gofs.2026.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Obstetrics Committee of the CNGOF, consulted by the CNP GOGM at the request of the ANSM, has reviewed the safety of obstetric vacuum extraction. Instrumental delivery may be performed to shorten the expulsive phase, particularly in cases of fetal heart rate deceleration. The available instruments are the vacuum, forceps, and spatulas, with the choice depending on the clinical situation and the operator. In France, approximately 12% of births involve instrumental assistance, a rate that has remained stable since 2016. The vacuum is used in about two-thirds of these cases - a proportion similar to that observed in most European countries and in Canada, but higher than in the United States. The vacuum works by creating suction on the fetal scalp, allowing controlled and safe traction. Maternal complications (perineal trauma, hemorrhage) and neonatal complications (notably intracranial hemorrhage) are rare and comparable to those observed in cesarean deliveries performed during labor. Epidemiological studies do not show an increased risk of neurological impairment or long-term sequelae in children born by vacuum extraction. Compared with forceps, vacuum extraction is associated with reduced maternal morbidity, particularly a lower risk of anal sphincter injury, with no significant difference in overall neonatal outcomes, except for a slightly higher risk of cephalohematoma or jaundice. No difference has been observed according to operator experience. In conclusion, vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, which is a technique among the methods recommended by the CNGOF, represents a relevant alternative to cesarean section at full cervical dilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56056,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique Fertilite & Senologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145936185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}