Pub Date : 2025-08-26DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101590
Julian Packheiser , Sebastian Ocklenburg , René Hurlemann , Dirk Scheele
Loneliness is a widespread experience, and its chronic form poses a significant risk for physical and mental health. Touch is a key modality of social interaction and has considerable health benefits across the lifespan. Touch-based interventions may serve as an effective method to alleviate loneliness. However, previous studies have yielded heterogenous results, with outcomes ranging from beneficial to detrimental effects in individuals experiencing loneliness. While methodological differences likely contribute to this inconsistency, a crucial factor, the chronicity of loneliness, has been largely overlooked. This review proposes a model in which the desire for social contact is enhanced during acute stages of loneliness. In contrast, chronic loneliness is associated with increased distrust and perceived social threat, potentially leading to reduced receptivity to touch. We argue that future research should account for the chronicity of loneliness when evaluating the efficacy of touch-based interventions, with experimental studies needed to empirically test this hypothesis.
{"title":"Embracing the void: exploring the relationship between chronic loneliness and social touch","authors":"Julian Packheiser , Sebastian Ocklenburg , René Hurlemann , Dirk Scheele","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101590","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101590","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness is a widespread experience, and its chronic form poses a significant risk for physical and mental health. Touch is a key modality of social interaction and has considerable health benefits across the lifespan. Touch-based interventions may serve as an effective method to alleviate loneliness. However, previous studies have yielded heterogenous results, with outcomes ranging from beneficial to detrimental effects in individuals experiencing loneliness. While methodological differences likely contribute to this inconsistency, a crucial factor, the chronicity of loneliness, has been largely overlooked. This review proposes a model in which the desire for social contact is enhanced during acute stages of loneliness. In contrast, chronic loneliness is associated with increased distrust and perceived social threat, potentially leading to reduced receptivity to touch. We argue that future research should account for the chronicity of loneliness when evaluating the efficacy of touch-based interventions, with experimental studies needed to empirically test this hypothesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144903262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-23DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101589
Amy C Gottschalk, Nicholas G Faturos, Arif A Hamid
The reinforcement learning community has made significant progress in understanding dopamine (DA) in reward learning, cognitive control, and motivation. Yet, little consensus remains about the functions of distinct DA bandwidths: fast phasic transients (milliseconds), ramps (seconds), and slow tonic shifts (minutes). Are these dynamics independent channels conveying distinct decision variables or temporal expressions of a unified DA computation? These questions lie at the heart of competing frameworks proposing divergent mechanisms for DA in reinforcement learning. This rift reflects not only conceptual disagreements but also the historical limitations of bandwidth-limited measurement tools. Emerging breakthroughs for wideband DA quantification promise rigorous testing of these theories. Here, we synthesize recent conceptual and technical advances and extend our prior proposals, suggesting that DA timescales reflect hierarchical control signals, emerging from perception of goal progress and distributed, circuit-level inference about policy efficacy where tonic DA represents the integration of goal alignment abstracted across planning horizons and control hierarchy.
{"title":"Timescales of dopamine release in the striatum as a window into hierarchical control","authors":"Amy C Gottschalk, Nicholas G Faturos, Arif A Hamid","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101589","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101589","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reinforcement learning community has made significant progress in understanding dopamine (DA) in reward learning, cognitive control, and motivation. Yet, little consensus remains about the functions of distinct DA bandwidths: fast phasic transients (milliseconds), ramps (seconds), and slow tonic shifts (minutes). Are these dynamics independent channels conveying distinct decision variables or temporal expressions of a unified DA computation? These questions lie at the heart of competing frameworks proposing divergent mechanisms for DA in reinforcement learning. This rift reflects not only conceptual disagreements but also the historical limitations of bandwidth-limited measurement tools. Emerging breakthroughs for wideband DA quantification promise rigorous testing of these theories. Here, we synthesize recent conceptual and technical advances and extend our prior proposals, suggesting that DA timescales reflect hierarchical control signals, emerging from perception of goal progress and distributed, circuit-level inference about policy efficacy where tonic DA represents the integration of goal alignment abstracted across planning horizons and control hierarchy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144890634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583
Fredrica Nyqvist , Laura Coll-Planas , Joanna McHugh Power
In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.
{"title":"Current research trends in macro-level perspectives on loneliness in older adults","authors":"Fredrica Nyqvist , Laura Coll-Planas , Joanna McHugh Power","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101583"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144866732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101585
Danika Geisler, Meghan L Meyer
The default network is known to engage more strongly ‘by default’ during rest compared to many cognitive tasks. The network is also reliably associated with social cognition, suggesting some forms of social cognition may occur ‘by default’ during rest. The goal of this opinion piece is to review accumulating evidence suggesting the default network performs two social cognitive processes during rest: social guiding and social consolidation. Social guiding refers to the observation that the immediate brain state participants enter in the default network as soon as they rest shapes their immediately following social cognition and behavior. Social consolidation refers to the observation that after participants are exposed to new social information, the default network commits the social information to memory during rest. After reviewing findings in support of social guiding and social consolidation, we offer directions for new research on these topics.
{"title":"The default network and social cognition: new insights and future directions","authors":"Danika Geisler, Meghan L Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101585","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101585","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The default network is known to engage more strongly ‘by default’ during rest compared to many cognitive tasks. The network is also reliably associated with social cognition, suggesting some forms of social cognition may occur ‘by default’ during rest. The goal of this opinion piece is to review accumulating evidence suggesting the default network performs two social cognitive processes during rest: social guiding and social consolidation. Social guiding refers to the observation that the immediate brain state participants enter in the default network as soon as they rest shapes their immediately following social cognition and behavior. Social consolidation refers to the observation that after participants are exposed to new social information, the default network commits the social information to memory during rest. After reviewing findings in support of social guiding and social consolidation, we offer directions for new research on these topics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144866731","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101586
Milena Imwinkelried, Noëmi Seewer, Tobias Krieger
Loneliness is a widespread phenomenon with adverse effects on health. Among others, psychological interventions have emerged as promising approaches to alleviate loneliness. This narrative review critically synthesizes recent evidence on the efficacy and mechanisms of psychological interventions for loneliness, structured along Grawe’s stage model of intervention research. While psychological interventions generally show moderate to large effects, substantial heterogeneity, limited evidence on long-term outcomes, and underrepresentation of diverse populations remain challenges. Furthermore, progress in the field is hindered by inconsistent definitions, suboptimal reporting, limited process research, and further methodological challenges. Several key research priorities are proposed for the development, evaluation, and implementation of more effective and sustainable psychological interventions for loneliness.
{"title":"Psychological interventions for loneliness: a narrative review of recent findings and suggestions for future research","authors":"Milena Imwinkelried, Noëmi Seewer, Tobias Krieger","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101586","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101586","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness is a widespread phenomenon with adverse effects on health. Among others, psychological interventions have emerged as promising approaches to alleviate loneliness. This narrative review critically synthesizes recent evidence on the efficacy and mechanisms of psychological interventions for loneliness, structured along Grawe’s stage model of intervention research. While psychological interventions generally show moderate to large effects, substantial heterogeneity, limited evidence on long-term outcomes, and underrepresentation of diverse populations remain challenges. Furthermore, progress in the field is hindered by inconsistent definitions, suboptimal reporting, limited process research, and further methodological challenges. Several key research priorities are proposed for the development, evaluation, and implementation of more effective and sustainable psychological interventions for loneliness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101586"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144831346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101584
Anna Abraham
The parsimony principle, or Occam’s razor, holds that the simplest explanation for a phenomenon is often one that offers its best or most likely account. When it comes to explanations for the brain basis of creativity, the most dominant one in contemporary times emphasizes the key role played by the default mode network (DMN), where dynamic interactions between the DMN and other brain networks, particularly the executive cognition network (ECN), are proposed to facilitate creative ideation. In this opinion paper, I argue that while DMN–ECN brain dynamics appear to offer the simplest explanation (and therefore, to follow Occam’s dictum, the most likely explanation) for the brain basis for creativity, to reach such a conclusion is not warranted because of fundamental weaknesses inherent in the evidence at hand. Three major concerns in this field of research include vast variability in scoring methodology across studies, the imposition of blanket interpretations and conclusions despite heterogeneous findings, and the failure to account for or even acknowledge individuality in the study of the creative process. The veneer of narrative simplicity, then, is a result of glossing over differences, ignoring the internal perspective of the creating individual, and overlooking evidence that runs contrary to the dominant explanation. This is Occam’s razor misapplied.
{"title":"Occam’s razor misapplied: Pinpointing the role of the default mode network in creativity","authors":"Anna Abraham","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101584","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101584","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The parsimony principle, or Occam’s razor, holds that the simplest explanation for a phenomenon is often one that offers its best or most likely account. When it comes to explanations for the brain basis of creativity, the most dominant one in contemporary times emphasizes the key role played by the default mode network (DMN), where dynamic interactions between the DMN and other brain networks, particularly the executive cognition network (ECN), are proposed to facilitate creative ideation. In this opinion paper, I argue that while DMN–ECN brain dynamics appear to offer the simplest explanation (and therefore, to follow Occam’s dictum, the most likely explanation) for the brain basis for creativity, to reach such a conclusion is not warranted because of fundamental weaknesses inherent in the evidence at hand. Three major concerns in this field of research include vast variability in scoring methodology across studies, the imposition of blanket interpretations and conclusions despite heterogeneous findings, and the failure to account for or even acknowledge individuality in the study of the creative process. The veneer of narrative simplicity, then, is a result of glossing over differences, ignoring the internal perspective of the creating individual, and overlooking evidence that runs contrary to the dominant explanation. This is Occam’s razor misapplied.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144772963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101578
Wendy Castillo
Although traditional quantitative approaches often reinforce the status quo (white supremacy), scholars dating back to W.E.B. Du Bois have also used them for justice to challenge racial and systemic inequities. This paper traces my personal journey from traditional (post)positivism quantitative methods to embracing critical methodologies, particularly those grounded in racial justice. I then highlight the transformative potential of emerging frameworks such as Quantitative Critical Race Theory (QuantCrit), Critical Structural Equation Modeling (CritSEM), Critical Race Mixed Methods (CRMM), and Justice-oriented Anti-racist Validation (JAV). These approaches not only challenge the biases embedded in quantitative research but also reimagine data collection, analysis, and interpretation to center justice. The paper concludes with a discussion on the future of critical quantitative methods, emphasizing the need for continued scholarship, methodological innovation, and training to institutionalize these approaches in research and policy.
尽管传统的定量方法往往会强化现状(白人至上主义),但早在W.E.B.杜波依斯(W.E.B. Du Bois)时代,学者们就已经用它们来寻求正义,挑战种族和体制上的不平等。本文追溯了我个人从传统(后)实证主义定量方法到拥抱批判方法的历程,特别是那些以种族正义为基础的方法。然后,我强调了新兴框架的变革潜力,如定量关键种族理论(QuantCrit)、关键结构方程建模(CritSEM)、关键种族混合方法(CRMM)和面向正义的反种族主义验证(JAV)。这些方法不仅挑战了定量研究中的偏见,而且重新构想了数据收集、分析和解释的中心正义。本文最后讨论了批判性定量方法的未来,强调需要持续的学术研究、方法创新和培训,以使这些方法在研究和政策中制度化。
{"title":"My path from traditional to critical quantitative methods: integrating racial equity frameworks in quantitative research","authors":"Wendy Castillo","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101578","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101578","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although traditional quantitative approaches often reinforce the status quo (white supremacy), scholars dating back to W.E.B. Du Bois have also used them for justice to challenge racial and systemic inequities. This paper traces my personal journey from traditional (post)positivism quantitative methods to embracing critical methodologies, particularly those grounded in racial justice. I then highlight the transformative potential of emerging frameworks such as Quantitative Critical Race Theory (QuantCrit), Critical Structural Equation Modeling (CritSEM), Critical Race Mixed Methods (CRMM), and Justice-oriented Anti-racist Validation (JAV). These approaches not only challenge the biases embedded in quantitative research but also reimagine data collection, analysis, and interpretation to center justice. The paper concludes with a discussion on the future of critical quantitative methods, emphasizing the need for continued scholarship, methodological innovation, and training to institutionalize these approaches in research and policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101578"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144772964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101582
Jiahua Xu , Yunzhe Liu
The default mode network (DMN), a hallmark of spontaneous brain activity during rest, is altered in various psychiatric disorders and linked to cognitive deficits. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and the development of targeted treatments has been challenging. Historically, resting-state research in psychiatry and task-based studies in cognitive neuroscience have progressed independently, limiting the translation of mechanistic insights into clinical practice. Recent advances in neural decoding methods, specifically those linking hippocampal replay to DMN activity during rest, have begun to bridge this gap. By probing the representations of resting brain activity in psychopathology research, we can more precisely characterise DMN-related dysfunction and uncover symptom-relevant mechanisms. These developments also lay the groundwork for targeted interventions: noninvasive neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial focused ultrasound, can be used to test causal hypotheses and optimise therapeutic strategies. Together, these innovations offer a more integrated framework for understanding the DMN and improving psychiatric outcomes.
{"title":"Targeting replay and default mode network dynamics during rest in psychiatric disorders","authors":"Jiahua Xu , Yunzhe Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101582","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101582","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The default mode network (DMN), a hallmark of spontaneous brain activity during rest, is altered in various psychiatric disorders and linked to cognitive deficits. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and the development of targeted treatments has been challenging. Historically, resting-state research in psychiatry and task-based studies in cognitive neuroscience have progressed independently, limiting the translation of mechanistic insights into clinical practice. Recent advances in neural decoding methods, specifically those linking hippocampal replay to DMN activity during rest, have begun to bridge this gap. By probing the representations of resting brain activity in psychopathology research, we can more precisely characterise DMN-related dysfunction and uncover symptom-relevant mechanisms. These developments also lay the groundwork for targeted interventions: noninvasive neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial focused ultrasound, can be used to test causal hypotheses and optimise therapeutic strategies. Together, these innovations offer a more integrated framework for understanding the DMN and improving psychiatric outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101582"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144781814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101580
Liz Jackson
Among topics in educational theory and philosophy, race and racism have been extensively developed in recent years. Despite public contestation about the continued relevance of race, most scholars in educational philosophy and theory regard a deepening understanding of race and racism as critical to enhancing equity in the future. This review considers how race and racism have been conceptualized and theorized within educational research to benefit youth and society. First, it gives a global picture about how race has been and is conceived in educational and other social theory. It links scholarship on race and racism to important global phenomena related to white supremacy, imperialism and colonialism, and multiculturalism. Then it considers contemporary developments in the field for understanding and conceptualizing race. In the course, it is demonstrated how definitions and conceptions change and shift over time and across locations.
{"title":"Theoretical and philosophical perspectives on race and racism in education","authors":"Liz Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101580","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101580","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Among topics in educational theory and philosophy, race and racism have been extensively developed in recent years. Despite public contestation about the continued relevance of race, most scholars in educational philosophy and theory regard a deepening understanding of race and racism as critical to enhancing equity in the future. This review considers how race and racism have been conceptualized and theorized within educational research to benefit youth and society. First, it gives a global picture about how race has been and is conceived in educational and other social theory. It links scholarship on race and racism to important global phenomena related to white supremacy, imperialism and colonialism, and multiculturalism. Then it considers contemporary developments in the field for understanding and conceptualizing race. In the course, it is demonstrated how definitions and conceptions change and shift over time and across locations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101580"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144749454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-30DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101577
Phillip A Boda
Advances in different approaches to critical quantitative statistics have been extensively used across various fields, with a wealth of empirical research illustrating applications and results. In education and other disciplines interested in disrupting White supremacy embodied across much of today’s policy and procedures, there is an increasing call to incorporate a diverse range of critical approaches to research methods. This pivoting aims to challenge the marginalization of subaltern ways of knowing, which has resulted in a tradition of reliance on (post-)positivist frameworks that limit the scope of research inference and validity. Critical psychometrics has become central in shaping our understanding of measurement, its accuracy, and the rationale behind approaches to code self-reported demographic categories as stable, fixed, and accurate estimates of oppression. This paper provides two mixed-methods survey study examples where these assumptions unsettle the notion that self-report demographics measure comparative indices of identity. Implications of this critical quantitative psychometric appraisal challenges the taken-for-granted nature of self-reported demographics; that is, these essentialized identity categories should be used to accurately and precisely compare differences between disability, race, class, gender, socioeconomic status, and educational background. With the validity theory behind this assumption challenged, this work provides a starting point, a stake in the ground, to pursue diverse methods to validate self-reports.
{"title":"Validity theory and validation of demographic self-report: a critical quantitative appraisal","authors":"Phillip A Boda","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101577","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101577","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in different approaches to critical quantitative statistics have been extensively used across various fields, with a wealth of empirical research illustrating applications and results. In education and other disciplines interested in disrupting White supremacy embodied across much of today’s policy and procedures, there is an increasing call to incorporate a diverse range of critical approaches to research methods. This pivoting aims to challenge the marginalization of subaltern ways of knowing, which has resulted in a tradition of reliance on (post-)positivist frameworks that limit the scope of research inference and validity. Critical psychometrics has become central in shaping our understanding of measurement, its accuracy, and the rationale behind approaches to code self-reported demographic categories as stable, fixed, and accurate estimates of oppression. This paper provides two mixed-methods survey study examples where these assumptions unsettle the notion that self-report demographics measure comparative indices of identity. Implications of this critical quantitative psychometric appraisal challenges the taken-for-granted nature of self-reported demographics; that is, these essentialized identity categories should be used to accurately and precisely compare differences between disability, race, class, gender, socioeconomic status, and educational background. With the validity theory behind this assumption challenged, this work provides a starting point, a stake in the ground, to pursue diverse methods to validate self-reports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101577"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144739319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}