JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports最新文献

Objective: This review aims to identify and synthesize the best qualitative evidence on the experiences of Chinese immigrants receiving palliative care in their country of residence where the culture is predominantly Western, and the experiences of their family carers.

Introduction: The recent increase in international immigration has led to challenges in providing culturally appropriate palliative care. Chinese populations have particular beliefs, values and practices surrounding death and filial piety. These differ considerably from those in Western cultures and have significant implications for palliative care service provision. This review will explore the experiences and perceptions of Chinese immigrants and how their cultural beliefs shape their acceptance and decision making related to palliative care.

Inclusion criteria: The review will include studies on the experiences of Chinese immigrants over 18 years of age with a terminal medical condition receiving palliative care in outpatient units, hospitals, hospices, specialist palliative care units, homes and community settings in their country of residence where the culture is predominantly Western.

Methods: Eligible studies will be studies with qualitative data including designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, narrative research, qualitative description, action research and feminist research published in English and Chinese. CINAHL, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection will be used and grey literature will be searched using ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, OpenGrey and Caresearch. Appraisal of selected studies will be done with the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review tool. Findings will be synthesized through a meta-aggregative approach to produce a comprehensive set of synthesized findings that can be used as a basis for evidence-based practice.

Objective: This scoping review aims to examine and map the existing evidence exploring and/or evaluating the implementation, cost and/or effectiveness of dietitian-led clinics in primary care.

Introduction: Dietitians may be able to offer new models of care within the primary care setting for relevant diagnosed patients, providing cheaper, more efficient and effective service in comparison to the traditional approach of general practitioner support and referral for specialist treatment. There is some evidence for the efficacy of dietetic care in primary care, but there is a lack of information concerning the broader contribution dietitians may make, including cost effectiveness and the range of conditions that dietitians may successfully manage.

Inclusion criteria: Eligible studies will explore dietitian- or nutritionist-led clinics treating patients with any condition, and will be based in primary care or general practice settings in developed countries. Studies may include experimental, quasi-experimental, observational and qualitative studies.

Methods: The searches will be limited to the past 10 years to ensure retrieved information will be relevant to today's healthcare setting. There will be no limit for language. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), AMED (EBSCO), British Nursing Index (ProQuest), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley). Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Where a decision is not possible, full text will be retrieved and reviewed. Data will be extracted from the included papers and a narrative summary will accompany the charted results and will describe how the results relate to the review's objective.

Objective: This review aims to examine the association between alcohol restriction policies and rates of alcohol-related harms in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

Introduction: A number of different strategies have been used to reduce the harms and costs associated with excessive alcohol consumption in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. These strategies, implemented at federal and state government levels, as well as by individual communities, have aimed to promote reduced alcohol consumption or prohibit consumption entirely. Strategies to address the problems associated with alcohol misuse can be categorized into three types: harm, demand and supply reduction.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider any kind of quantitative research study that includes Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in communities subject to alcohol control policies due to the imposition of alcohol management plans or other alcohol restriction policies. Included studies will measure physical alcohol-related harms. The secondary outcome of interest will be rates of alcohol consumption measured as alcohol sales per person or as self-reported consumption. Studies published in English from 1998 will be included.

Methods: The proposed systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Published and unpublished studies will be sourced from multiple databases and resources. Two independent reviewers will screen, appraise and extract data from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Data synthesis will be conducted and a Summary of Findings will be constructed.

Objective: This scoping review aims to map non-pharmacological interventions for reducing acute pain for adult victims of trauma.

Introduction: Acute pain, as a consequence of either a pathological or traumatic event or even due to invasive and non-invasive healthcare procedures, is highly prevalent in critically ill patients. However, specific acute pain as a direct consequence of trauma is one of the least studied areas of acute pain.

Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider studies on adult victims of trauma, aged 18 years or over, in prehospital emergency care, emergency departments and trauma centers. All studies that focus on non-pharmacological interventions designed to reduce acute pain, implemented and evaluated by health professionals in any form, duration, frequency and intensity, will be considered.

Methods: An initial search of PubMed and CINAHL will be undertaken, followed by a second search for published and unpublished studies from 2000 to the present in major healthcare related electronic databases. Studies in English, French, Spanish and Portuguese will be included. Data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers in tabular form and include details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of interest. A narrative synthesis will accompany the results and will describe how they relate to the review objectives.

Objective: This review aims to examine the state of the evidence for interprofessional team-based primary health care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Introduction: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities have complex health needs, as well as experience health service inequities. Interprofessional primary healthcare teams offer access to comprehensive primary health care and are recommended as an approach to improve the health of this population. At present, limited information is available regarding what services interprofessional primary healthcare teams provide and how services are evaluated specific to the care of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider all studies that reference individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities who are 18 years and over. It will consider all studies that refer to interprofessional healthcare provision within a primary healthcare team context. Interprofessional care is the term that will be used to describe services provided by interprofessional health providers (e.g. nurses, dietitians, social workers) in these teams. Work completed by physicians and nurses within traditional general practices will be excluded.

Methods: This review will be conducted according to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. It will consider quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods study designs for inclusion. In addition, systematic reviews, program descriptions, clinical reviews and opinion papers will be considered. The review will consider all studies published since 2000 in English or French. All duplicates will be removed from identified citations. A data extraction tool will assist reviewers to identify and synthesize findings from selected papers.

Objective: This review aims to systematically map the literature reporting on oral health outcomes experienced by people with cerebral palsy.

Introduction: At present, there are no documented systematic reviews reporting on oral health outcomes for people of all ages with cerebral palsy. Subsequently, there are no clear guidelines, frameworks or detailed oral health recommendations for people with cerebral palsy. Considering the importance of oral health on general well-being and quality of life, it is important that it is not overlooked when focusing on patient-centered care for people with cerebral palsy.

Inclusion criteria: Studies that focus on oral health, including dental diagnosis, trauma and/or treatment, facial pain, saliva, and sleep apnea, and/or make statements regarding oral health pertaining to cerebral palsy will be considered for inclusion inthis scoping review.

Methods: This review will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines outlined by JBI methodology for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Articles published in any language will be considered for inclusion, with no restriction on publication date. The search databases will include the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Dentistry and Oral Science. A search of gray literature will also be conducted. Extracted data relevant to the scoping review will be performed by two reviewers.