首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP最新文献

英文 中文
Retrospective assessment of medication patterns among candidates evaluated for living kidney donation 对接受活体肾脏捐献评估的候选人用药模式的回顾性评估
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1988
Drew T. Dickinson Pharm.D., MPH, Linh Nguyen Pharm.D., Xinqi Liu Pharm.D., Gianna Castro, Morgan Cherry B.S., Fadel Dadabaev, Hercys Sanchez Rodriguez, Gregory E. Malat Pharm.D., Abigail Forte Pharm.D., Ty B. Dunn M.D., M.S., Robert R. Redfield III M.D., Amanda Leonberg-Yoo M.D., M.S., Jennifer Trofe-Clark Pharm.D., FCCP

Introduction

Medication use in living kidney donor (LKD) candidates may have important implications for evaluation and donation care. We sought to characterize LKD candidate medication use through medication histories conducted at nephrologist evaluation and transplant pharmacist preoperative visits.

Methods

This retrospective single-center cohort study included adult LKD candidates evaluated for donation between October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2021. Scheduled and as-needed medications for each candidate were abstracted from pre-donation medication histories collected at the evaluation visit with the nephrologist and the preoperative visit with the transplant pharmacist, if approved for donation. Medication histories from each visit were compared with each other and evaluated by therapeutic class frequency.

Results

Among 213 LKD candidates (112 approved for donation and 101 declined for donation), 198 (93.0%) candidates were taking at least one prescription medication, over-the-counter agent, or dietary supplement. Antidepressants and antihypertensives were the most common prescription agents used among candidates, with antihypertensives more common among declined donors (20.8% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.042). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were more commonly identified at the evaluation visit of approved candidates compared to the preoperative visit (29.5% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001) and dietary supplements were more commonly identified at the preoperative visit compared to the evaluation visit (49.1% vs. 59.8%, p = 0.023).

Conclusions

The frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decreased greatly between the evaluation and preoperative visit, likely reflective of discontinuation pre-donation. Characterizing medication use among candidates evaluated for LKD donation may assist donor programs with developing more targeted patient medication education. Nearly all LKD candidates were taking a medication or dietary supplement pre-donation. Transplant pharmacists are uniquely positioned to perform medication reconciliations and can also offer guidance to other team providers on best practices for this process. A better understanding of medication patterns in this population may also aid with further developing care guidelines for LKD evaluation and pre-/postoperative LKD care.

导言:活体肾脏捐献者(LKD)候选人的用药情况可能会对评估和捐献护理产生重要影响。我们试图通过肾科医生评估和移植药剂师术前访视时采集的用药史来描述活体肾脏捐献候选人的用药情况。 方法 这项回顾性单中心队列研究纳入了在 2019 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 1 日期间接受捐赠评估的成年 LKD 候选人。从肾脏科医生评估就诊和移植药剂师术前就诊(如果获准捐献)时收集的捐献前用药史中摘录了每位候选人的计划用药和必需用药。将每次就诊的用药记录进行比较,并按治疗类别频率进行评估。 结果 在 213 名 LKD 候选人(112 人获准捐献,101 人拒绝捐献)中,198 人(93.0%)至少服用一种处方药、非处方药或膳食补充剂。抗抑郁药和抗高血压药是捐献者最常服用的处方药,其中抗高血压药在被拒绝的捐献者中更为常见(20.8% 对 10.7%,P = 0.042)。与术前访视相比,非甾体类抗炎药在获批捐献者的评估访视中更常见(29.5% 对 0.9%,p = 0.001),与评估访视相比,膳食补充剂在术前访视中更常见(49.1% 对 59.8%,p = 0.023)。 结论 从评估到术前就诊期间,非甾体抗炎药的使用频率大大降低,这可能反映了捐献前停药的情况。对接受 LKD 捐献评估的候选者的用药情况进行描述,可帮助捐献计划制定更有针对性的患者用药教育。几乎所有肺结核候选者在捐献前都在服用药物或膳食补充剂。移植药剂师在进行药物对账方面具有得天独厚的优势,他们还可以就这一过程的最佳实践为其他团队提供指导。更好地了解这一人群的用药模式也有助于进一步制定 LKD 评估和 LKD 术前/术后护理指南。
{"title":"Retrospective assessment of medication patterns among candidates evaluated for living kidney donation","authors":"Drew T. Dickinson Pharm.D., MPH,&nbsp;Linh Nguyen Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Xinqi Liu Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Gianna Castro,&nbsp;Morgan Cherry B.S.,&nbsp;Fadel Dadabaev,&nbsp;Hercys Sanchez Rodriguez,&nbsp;Gregory E. Malat Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Abigail Forte Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Ty B. Dunn M.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Robert R. Redfield III M.D.,&nbsp;Amanda Leonberg-Yoo M.D., M.S.,&nbsp;Jennifer Trofe-Clark Pharm.D., FCCP","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1988","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1988","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Medication use in living kidney donor (LKD) candidates may have important implications for evaluation and donation care. We sought to characterize LKD candidate medication use through medication histories conducted at nephrologist evaluation and transplant pharmacist preoperative visits.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This retrospective single-center cohort study included adult LKD candidates evaluated for donation between October 1, 2019 and October 1, 2021. Scheduled and as-needed medications for each candidate were abstracted from pre-donation medication histories collected at the evaluation visit with the nephrologist and the preoperative visit with the transplant pharmacist, if approved for donation. Medication histories from each visit were compared with each other and evaluated by therapeutic class frequency.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Among 213 LKD candidates (112 approved for donation and 101 declined for donation), 198 (93.0%) candidates were taking at least one prescription medication, over-the-counter agent, or dietary supplement. Antidepressants and antihypertensives were the most common prescription agents used among candidates, with antihypertensives more common among declined donors (20.8% vs. 10.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.042). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were more commonly identified at the evaluation visit of approved candidates compared to the preoperative visit (29.5% vs. 0.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and dietary supplements were more commonly identified at the preoperative visit compared to the evaluation visit (49.1% vs. 59.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.023).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs decreased greatly between the evaluation and preoperative visit, likely reflective of discontinuation pre-donation. Characterizing medication use among candidates evaluated for LKD donation may assist donor programs with developing more targeted patient medication education. Nearly all LKD candidates were taking a medication or dietary supplement pre-donation. Transplant pharmacists are uniquely positioned to perform medication reconciliations and can also offer guidance to other team providers on best practices for this process. A better understanding of medication patterns in this population may also aid with further developing care guidelines for LKD evaluation and pre-/postoperative LKD care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 7","pages":"637-646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1988","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141584124","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case series: Perioperative management of patients in the ICU 病例系列:重症监护室患者的围手术期管理
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1979
Melanie Smith Condeni Pharm.D.
{"title":"Case series: Perioperative management of patients in the ICU","authors":"Melanie Smith Condeni Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1979","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 6","pages":"589-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best practices in online/distance pharmacy practice course didactic instruction 在线/远程药学实践课程教学的最佳做法
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1983
Dawn E. Havrda Pharm.D., FCCP, Andrew J. Crannage Pharm.D., FCCP, Angela L. Bingham Pharm.D., FCCP, Kristen M. Cook Pharm.D., Susan E. Hamblin Pharm.D., Andie E. Lloyd Pharm.D., J. Russell May Pharm.D., Jessica R. Merlo Pharm.D., Kaely G. Miller Pharm.D., MBA, Christina A. Spivey Ph.D.

This commentary provides an overview of the current literature and best practices for online learning and assessment within the didactic curriculum of pharmacy education, building on the 2022 ACCP commentary addressing remote experiential learning. Lessons learned from online delivery of curricula and best practices for programs to create the optimal online learning environment for students are reviewed. Although benefits of online learning have been found, such as flexibility, convenience, and efficient use of time, with similar short-term student performance, the potential long-term implications on pharmacy students are not fully known, particularly concerning board pass rates, job attainment, and knowledge/skills application in the workplace. This commentary reviews and recommends the types of teaching modalities that align best with an online format for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction. The most challenging part of didactic curricula to teach remotely is skills development. Proficiency in skills (e.g., compounding preparations or physical assessment) is best evaluated in person to promote student self-confidence in pharmacy practice and patient care. This commentary reviews the needed components for designing quality online courses, all in the context of remembering the significance of instructor engagement. The commentary also discusses the importance of bidirectional feedback for the instructor and student and the deliberate use of formative assessments of learning to gauge student performance. A review of online summative and high-stakes assessments is included with a focus on ensuring academic integrity while also minimizing any impact on student performance and anxiety. As pharmacy education has learned from the experiences with the COVID-19 transition to online learning, consideration should be given to best practices regarding when and how to use online modalities to teach students and foster student learning. Regardless of the format, courses should engage the student and instructor and be evaluated routinely to promote achievement of learning outcomes.

本评论在 2022 年 ACCP 关于远程体验学习的评论的基础上,概述了药学教育教学课程中在线学习和评估的现有文献和最佳实践。文章回顾了在线课程交付的经验教训,以及为学生创造最佳在线学习环境的最佳实践。尽管在线学习具有灵活性、便利性和高效利用时间等优点,而且学生的短期表现也相似,但其对药学专业学生的潜在长期影响尚不完全清楚,尤其是在考试通过率、就业率和知识/技能在工作场所的应用方面。这篇评论回顾并推荐了与在线形式最匹配的教学模式类型,以提高知识获取率和学生满意度。远程教学课程中最具挑战性的部分是技能培养。技能(如复方制剂或体格评估)的熟练程度最好当面评估,以增强学生在药学实践和患者护理方面的自信心。本评论回顾了设计高质量在线课程所需的要素,同时也提醒了教师参与的重要性。评论还讨论了教师和学生双向反馈的重要性,以及有意使用形成性学习评估来衡量学生表现的重要性。评论还回顾了在线终结性评估和高风险评估,重点是确保学术诚信,同时尽量减少对学生成绩和焦虑的影响。随着药学教育从 COVID-19 过渡到在线学习的经验中吸取教训,应考虑何时以及如何使用在线模式来教授学生并促进学生学习的最佳实践。无论采用哪种形式,课程都应让学生和教师参与其中,并定期进行评估,以促进学习成果的实现。
{"title":"Best practices in online/distance pharmacy practice course didactic instruction","authors":"Dawn E. Havrda Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Andrew J. Crannage Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Angela L. Bingham Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Kristen M. Cook Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Susan E. Hamblin Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Andie E. Lloyd Pharm.D.,&nbsp;J. Russell May Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Jessica R. Merlo Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kaely G. Miller Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Christina A. Spivey Ph.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1983","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary provides an overview of the current literature and best practices for online learning and assessment within the didactic curriculum of pharmacy education, building on the 2022 ACCP commentary addressing remote experiential learning. Lessons learned from online delivery of curricula and best practices for programs to create the optimal online learning environment for students are reviewed. Although benefits of online learning have been found, such as flexibility, convenience, and efficient use of time, with similar short-term student performance, the potential long-term implications on pharmacy students are not fully known, particularly concerning board pass rates, job attainment, and knowledge/skills application in the workplace. This commentary reviews and recommends the types of teaching modalities that align best with an online format for knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction. The most challenging part of didactic curricula to teach remotely is skills development. Proficiency in skills (e.g., compounding preparations or physical assessment) is best evaluated in person to promote student self-confidence in pharmacy practice and patient care. This commentary reviews the needed components for designing quality online courses, all in the context of remembering the significance of instructor engagement. The commentary also discusses the importance of bidirectional feedback for the instructor and student and the deliberate use of formative assessments of learning to gauge student performance. A review of online summative and high-stakes assessments is included with a focus on ensuring academic integrity while also minimizing any impact on student performance and anxiety. As pharmacy education has learned from the experiences with the COVID-19 transition to online learning, consideration should be given to best practices regarding when and how to use online modalities to teach students and foster student learning. Regardless of the format, courses should engage the student and instructor and be evaluated routinely to promote achievement of learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 7","pages":"670-676"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141583853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A change to the pathway: The Impact of the Supreme Court of the United States affirmative action decision on clinical pharmacy and a call to action for pharmacists 改变途径:美国最高法院平权裁决对临床药学的影响以及对药剂师的行动呼吁
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1961
Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir Pharm.D., MPH, Tyler Marie Kiles Pharm.D., John M. Allen Pharm.D., FCCP, Hope E. Campbell Pharm.D.
{"title":"A change to the pathway: The Impact of the Supreme Court of the United States affirmative action decision on clinical pharmacy and a call to action for pharmacists","authors":"Jacinda C. Abdul-Mutakabbir Pharm.D., MPH,&nbsp;Tyler Marie Kiles Pharm.D.,&nbsp;John M. Allen Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Hope E. Campbell Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1961","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1961","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 6","pages":"520-522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141391311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge” 更正为 "药剂师主导的干预措施,以减少在医院和重症监护室出院时在急症护理环境中启动的目标药物的不当延续"
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1995

Patel, N, Dannemiller, RE, Kovacevic, MP, Dube, KM, Lupi, KE, Blum, RC, Crowley, KE. Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge. J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2024; 7(4): 358366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1924

In Table 3, the text “stimulants” was incorrectly spelled as “simulants.”

We apologize for this error.

Patel, N, Dannemiller, RE, Kovacevic, MP, Dube, KM, Lupi, KE, Blum, RC, Crowley, KE. 以药剂师为主导的干预措施,减少出院时在急症护理环境中开始使用的靶向药物的不适当继续使用。J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2024; 7(4):https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1924 在表 3 中,"兴奋剂 "被错误拼写为 "模拟剂"。对此我们深表歉意。
{"title":"Correction to “Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1995","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 <span>Patel, N</span>, <span>Dannemiller, RE</span>, <span>Kovacevic, MP</span>, <span>Dube, KM</span>, <span>Lupi, KE</span>, <span>Blum, RC</span>, <span>Crowley, KE</span>. <span>Pharmacist-led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge</span>. <i>J Am Coll Clin Pharm</i>. <span>2024</span>; <span>7</span>(<span>4</span>): <span>358</span>–<span>366</span>. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1924\u0000 </p><p>In Table 3, the text “stimulants” was incorrectly spelled as “simulants.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 9","pages":"976-978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1995","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age-based transitions of care: Where is the pharmacist? 基于年龄的护理过渡:药剂师在哪里?
Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1962
Sara W. Hovey Pharm.D., Christine Tabulov Pharm.D., Kelly L. Matson Pharm.D., Hanna Phan Pharm.D., FCCP
{"title":"Age-based transitions of care: Where is the pharmacist?","authors":"Sara W. Hovey Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Christine Tabulov Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kelly L. Matson Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Hanna Phan Pharm.D., FCCP","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1962","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1962","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 6","pages":"523-528"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141395071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integration of the key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics list within the electronic health record in a tertiary care children's hospital 在一家三级儿童医院的电子病历中整合儿科主要潜在不当药物清单
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1975
Seerat Kapoor Pharm.D., William A. Mabry Pharm.D., MBA, Dhyana Naik Pharm.D., Kelly S. Bobo Pharm.D., MBA

Introduction

The key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics (KIDs) List raises awareness of medications and excipients that should be used cautiously in specific age groups, appropriately monitored, or avoided. This project used the KIDs List to identify opportunities to improve our clinical decision support program and adjust the medication formulary.

Methods

Our team used the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle to assess items and take actions that included no change, creation of an alert or task for pharmacists or providers, referral for additional study, inventory modification, and modification of dose range alerts.

Results

Our initial assessment of 34 formulary items identified 10 items (29%) with the recommendations from the KIDs list in place; 72% (24/34) were referred for further study. In the preliminary phase, 15% (5/34) were submitted to pharmacy information technology (IT) to develop an alert, 24% (8/34) needed inventory modifications, 24% (8/34) required dose range alert adjustments, and 9% (3/34) were referred for additional study. Final actions included the development of six new alerts, inventory modification for nine medications, dose range checking for eight medications, and no change for 11 medications.

Discussion

The PDSA cycle was an effective process that allowed the team to assess each medication using a systematic approach and encouraged additional analysis when needed. We were able to compare the KIDs List recommendations to current clinical decision support parameters and make adjustments or develop new alerts within the electronic health record to match the current standard. This initiative had a team-based approach, included key stakeholders, and is replicable in other institutions.

儿科关键潜在不当药物(KIDs)清单提高了人们对特定年龄组应慎用、适当监控或避免使用的药物和辅料的认识。我们的团队采用计划、实施、研究、行动(PDSA)循环来评估项目并采取相应行动,包括不做任何改变、为药剂师或医疗服务提供者创建提示或任务、转介进行更多研究、修改库存以及修改剂量范围提示。我们对 34 个处方药项目进行了初步评估,发现 10 个项目(29%)采纳了 KIDs 列表中的建议;72% 的项目(24/34)转介进行更多研究。在初步阶段,15%(5/34)的项目被提交至药房信息技术部门(IT)以制定警示,24%(8/34)的项目需要修改库存,24%(8/34)的项目需要调整剂量范围警示,9%(3/34)的项目被提交进行进一步研究。PDSA 循环是一个有效的流程,它允许团队使用系统的方法对每种药物进行评估,并鼓励在需要时进行额外分析。我们能够将 KID 列表建议与当前的临床决策支持参数进行比较,并在电子健康记录中进行调整或开发新的警报,以符合当前的标准。这项计划以团队为基础,包括主要利益相关者,可在其他机构推广。
{"title":"Integration of the key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics list within the electronic health record in a tertiary care children's hospital","authors":"Seerat Kapoor Pharm.D.,&nbsp;William A. Mabry Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;Dhyana Naik Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kelly S. Bobo Pharm.D., MBA","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1975","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1975","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The key potentially inappropriate drugs in pediatrics (KIDs) List raises awareness of medications and excipients that should be used cautiously in specific age groups, appropriately monitored, or avoided. This project used the KIDs List to identify opportunities to improve our clinical decision support program and adjust the medication formulary.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our team used the Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle to assess items and take actions that included no change, creation of an alert or task for pharmacists or providers, referral for additional study, inventory modification, and modification of dose range alerts.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our initial assessment of 34 formulary items identified 10 items (29%) with the recommendations from the KIDs list in place; 72% (24/34) were referred for further study. In the preliminary phase, 15% (5/34) were submitted to pharmacy information technology (IT) to develop an alert, 24% (8/34) needed inventory modifications, 24% (8/34) required dose range alert adjustments, and 9% (3/34) were referred for additional study. Final actions included the development of six new alerts, inventory modification for nine medications, dose range checking for eight medications, and no change for 11 medications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The PDSA cycle was an effective process that allowed the team to assess each medication using a systematic approach and encouraged additional analysis when needed. We were able to compare the KIDs List recommendations to current clinical decision support parameters and make adjustments or develop new alerts within the electronic health record to match the current standard. This initiative had a team-based approach, included key stakeholders, and is replicable in other institutions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 8","pages":"744-753"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141380215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using a rule-based decision tool for medication dose selection to improve patient safety and the need for pharmacist intervention 使用基于规则的决策工具选择药物剂量,提高患者安全性和药剂师干预的必要性
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1981
Tyler Finocchio Pharm.D., MHIIM, Gregory Jaszczur Pharm.D.

Introduction

An assortment of alerts has been employed to influence provider order entry, yet many medication orders still require dose adjustment by pharmacists upon order verification.

Objectives

The primary goals of this study were to evaluate the impact of adding rule-based decision support to the computerized provider order entry system on the need for medication dose adjustment by a pharmacist and the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective, pre- and post-implementation observational study on the integration of rule-based logic into the computerized provider order entry system to automatically select default doses and frequencies for weight-based or renally-cleared medications in alignment with health system guidelines. The primary end points were the proportion of medication orders that required pharmacist intervention for dose adjustment and the number of times the AKI pop-up alert was triggered.

Results

After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to all available orders, there were 47 393 and 45 767 orders included for final analysis in the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. The post-implementation period showed a significant reduction in pharmacist dosing interventions, with a relative risk of 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.43; p < 0.0001) and a reduction in AKI (relative risk = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.53–0.64; p < 0.0001]).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential of rule-based decision support to improve initial medication dose selection, reduce the occurrence of AKI, and reduce pharmacist workload, all without increasing alert fatigue.

本研究的主要目的是评估在计算机化医嘱输入系统中添加基于规则的决策支持对药剂师调整药物剂量的需求和患者急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率的影响。这是一项实施前和实施后的回顾性观察研究,研究内容是将基于规则的逻辑整合到计算机化医嘱输入系统中,以便根据医疗系统指南自动选择基于体重或肾脏清除的药物的默认剂量和频率。研究的主要终点是需要药剂师干预调整剂量的用药医嘱比例和触发 AKI 弹出警报的次数。在对所有可用医嘱应用纳入和排除标准后,实施前和实施后分别有 47 393 份和 45 767 份医嘱被纳入最终分析。实施后,药剂师的用药干预显著减少,相对风险为 0.42(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.40-0.43;p < 0.0001),AKI 也有所减少(相对风险 = 0.58 [95% CI:0.53-0.64;p < 0.0001])。这项研究证明了基于规则的决策支持在改善初始用药剂量选择、减少 AKI 发生和减轻药剂师工作量方面的潜力,而所有这些都不会增加警报疲劳。
{"title":"Using a rule-based decision tool for medication dose selection to improve patient safety and the need for pharmacist intervention","authors":"Tyler Finocchio Pharm.D., MHIIM,&nbsp;Gregory Jaszczur Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1981","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1981","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>An assortment of alerts has been employed to influence provider order entry, yet many medication orders still require dose adjustment by pharmacists upon order verification.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The primary goals of this study were to evaluate the impact of adding rule-based decision support to the computerized provider order entry system on the need for medication dose adjustment by a pharmacist and the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This was a retrospective, pre- and post-implementation observational study on the integration of rule-based logic into the computerized provider order entry system to automatically select default doses and frequencies for weight-based or renally-cleared medications in alignment with health system guidelines. The primary end points were the proportion of medication orders that required pharmacist intervention for dose adjustment and the number of times the AKI pop-up alert was triggered.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to all available orders, there were 47 393 and 45 767 orders included for final analysis in the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. The post-implementation period showed a significant reduction in pharmacist dosing interventions, with a relative risk of 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.43; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and a reduction in AKI (relative risk = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.53–0.64; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001]).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study demonstrates the potential of rule-based decision support to improve initial medication dose selection, reduce the occurrence of AKI, and reduce pharmacist workload, all without increasing alert fatigue.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 8","pages":"795-802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141268164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacy-led optimization of transitions of care in patients with heart failure 以药房为主导优化心力衰竭患者的护理转换
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1982
Julianne M. Fallon Pharm.D., Emily McElhaney Pharm.D., Keith Anderson Pharm.D., Daniel A. Lewis Pharm.D., MBA, J. Bradley Williams Pharm.D.

Introduction

Effective transitional care for patients with heart failure is essential to ensure optimal utilization of guideline-directed medical therapy. Clinical pharmacists and specially trained pharmacy technicians have unique skillsets that enable them to improve care transitions.

Objectives

To evaluate the implementation of a comprehensive pharmacy transitions of care program in an acute heart failure population.

Methods

A retrospective, single center, single-arm study evaluating pharmacy-delivered transitions of care services (admission and discharge medication reconciliation, medication cost assessment, medication counseling, bedside delivery of discharge medications, and post-discharge phone calls) for patients discharged from the heart failure service. The primary outcome was the completion rate of transitions of care services. Secondary outcomes included the medication intervention rate and types of interventions made, medication classes assessed for cost, discharge medication prescription captured, and 30-day all-cause readmissions.

Results

Five hundred and ninety-five patients were eligible for the transitions of care program. Admission and discharge medication reconciliations were completed in 68.1% and 92.1% of patients, respectively. Medication cost assessments were completed for 39.8% of patients. Heart failure medication counseling prior to discharge was completed for 83.9% of patients. Discharge prescription capture rate was 56.5% and bedside prescription delivery was provided for 27.8% of patients. The discharge medication reconciliation intervention rate was 37.4%, with the most common intervention being dose adjustment. Post-discharge outreach was conducted for 229 patients, with education provided for 69.4% and an intervention rate of 43.7%. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was lower for patients on the heart failure service compared with the institution (10.1% vs 16.5%).

Conclusion

High rates of completion and utilization were identified after the implementation of a comprehensive pharmacy transitions of care program. Utilization of clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians during transitions of care improved medication access, patient education, and reduced medication-related problems.

对心力衰竭患者进行有效的过渡护理对于确保最佳利用指南指导的医疗疗法至关重要。一项回顾性、单中心、单臂研究评估了由药剂师为心力衰竭出院患者提供的过渡护理服务(入院和出院用药核对、用药成本评估、用药咨询、出院药物床旁递送以及出院后电话联系)。主要结果是护理服务过渡的完成率。次要结果包括用药干预率和干预类型、评估成本的用药类别、出院用药处方记录以及 30 天全因再入院率。分别有 68.1% 和 92.1% 的患者完成了入院和出院药物对账。39.8%的患者完成了用药成本评估。83.9%的患者完成了出院前的心衰用药咨询。出院处方采集率为 56.5%,为 27.8% 的患者提供了床旁处方递送服务。出院药物调节干预率为 37.4%,最常见的干预措施是调整剂量。对 229 名患者进行了出院后宣传,其中 69.4% 的患者接受了教育,干预率为 43.7%。与医疗机构相比,接受心衰服务的患者 30 天全因再入院率较低(10.1% vs 16.5%)。临床药剂师和药剂技师在护理转换过程中的应用改善了药物的可及性和患者教育,并减少了药物相关问题。
{"title":"Pharmacy-led optimization of transitions of care in patients with heart failure","authors":"Julianne M. Fallon Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Emily McElhaney Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Keith Anderson Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Daniel A. Lewis Pharm.D., MBA,&nbsp;J. Bradley Williams Pharm.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1982","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1982","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Effective transitional care for patients with heart failure is essential to ensure optimal utilization of guideline-directed medical therapy. Clinical pharmacists and specially trained pharmacy technicians have unique skillsets that enable them to improve care transitions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate the implementation of a comprehensive pharmacy transitions of care program in an acute heart failure population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A retrospective, single center, single-arm study evaluating pharmacy-delivered transitions of care services (admission and discharge medication reconciliation, medication cost assessment, medication counseling, bedside delivery of discharge medications, and post-discharge phone calls) for patients discharged from the heart failure service. The primary outcome was the completion rate of transitions of care services. Secondary outcomes included the medication intervention rate and types of interventions made, medication classes assessed for cost, discharge medication prescription captured, and 30-day all-cause readmissions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Five hundred and ninety-five patients were eligible for the transitions of care program. Admission and discharge medication reconciliations were completed in 68.1% and 92.1% of patients, respectively. Medication cost assessments were completed for 39.8% of patients. Heart failure medication counseling prior to discharge was completed for 83.9% of patients. Discharge prescription capture rate was 56.5% and bedside prescription delivery was provided for 27.8% of patients. The discharge medication reconciliation intervention rate was 37.4%, with the most common intervention being dose adjustment. Post-discharge outreach was conducted for 229 patients, with education provided for 69.4% and an intervention rate of 43.7%. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was lower for patients on the heart failure service compared with the institution (10.1% vs 16.5%).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>High rates of completion and utilization were identified after the implementation of a comprehensive pharmacy transitions of care program. Utilization of clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians during transitions of care improved medication access, patient education, and reduced medication-related problems.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 8","pages":"778-786"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1982","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141265394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation on error and patient harm prevention at a large academic medical center 药剂师主导的出院用药核对对一家大型学术医疗中心预防差错和患者伤害的影响
IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1980
Linda Zheng Pharm.D., Tiffany Pon Pharm.D., Sarah Bajorek Pharm.D., Kathie Le Pharm.D., Rebecca Hluhanich Pharm.D., Yunyi Ren M.S., Machelle Wilson Ph.D.

Introduction

Medication errors during hospital discharge can lead to adverse outcomes, medication-related readmissions, and increased health care costs. Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at discharge is a potential solution to mitigate poor outcomes and optimize medication safety.

Objectives

This study aimed to quantify medication errors identified at discharge and characterize the severity of patient harm prevented following pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation. Cost avoidance analysis was conducted to determine its associated financial impact.

Methods

Patients, who were discharged from an adult internal medicine service during October 2022, were included in this one-month pilot prospective quality improvement study. The number of errors at discharge were documented, categorized by type, and adjudicated for severity of potential harm. Error severity was classified based on a modified National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Medication Error Index. Cost avoidance was calculated based on whether each error would have resulted in additional medical encounters and length of stay.

Results

Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Forty errors were identified by pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at discharge, with a mean of 1.3 ± 1.9 errors per patient and 68% of patients having at least one error. The most common errors were duplication of therapy (25%) and medication access barriers at discharge (25%). The severity of errors included low (22.5%), serious (75%), and life-threatening harm (2.5%). Thirty-five percent of errors could have led to emergency visits or hospital readmissions. The estimated total cost for errors was $25 600. Pharmacist labor cost for reconciliation was $816. Cost avoidance was $24 784 from the 14 errors at discharge that could have resulted in additional emergency or inpatient visits.

Conclusion

Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at discharge may prevent harm from reaching patients, decrease cost from unnecessary health encounters, and stop the error from continuing across transitions of care.

出院时的用药错误会导致不良后果、与用药相关的再入院率以及医疗费用的增加。本研究旨在量化出院时发现的用药错误,并描述药剂师指导的出院用药协调所避免的患者伤害的严重程度。这项为期一个月的前瞻性质量改进试点研究纳入了 2022 年 10 月期间从成人内科出院的患者。记录出院时的错误数量,按类型进行分类,并根据潜在危害的严重程度进行判定。错误严重程度是根据修改后的国家用药错误报告和预防协调委员会用药错误指数进行分类的。根据每个错误是否会导致额外的就诊次数和住院时间来计算避免的成本。出院时,药剂师指导的用药核对发现了 40 处错误,平均每名患者有 1.3 ± 1.9 处错误,68% 的患者至少有一处错误。最常见的错误是重复治疗(25%)和出院时用药障碍(25%)。错误的严重程度包括轻微(22.5%)、严重(75%)和危及生命(2.5%)。35%的错误可能会导致急诊或再次入院。错误的总成本估计为 25600 美元。药剂师用于调节的人工成本为 816 美元。由药剂师主导的出院时用药核对工作可避免对患者造成伤害,降低不必要的就医成本,并阻止错误在护理过程中继续发生。
{"title":"Impact of pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation on error and patient harm prevention at a large academic medical center","authors":"Linda Zheng Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Tiffany Pon Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Sarah Bajorek Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Kathie Le Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Rebecca Hluhanich Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Yunyi Ren M.S.,&nbsp;Machelle Wilson Ph.D.","doi":"10.1002/jac5.1980","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jac5.1980","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Medication errors during hospital discharge can lead to adverse outcomes, medication-related readmissions, and increased health care costs. Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at discharge is a potential solution to mitigate poor outcomes and optimize medication safety.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to quantify medication errors identified at discharge and characterize the severity of patient harm prevented following pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation. Cost avoidance analysis was conducted to determine its associated financial impact.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients, who were discharged from an adult internal medicine service during October 2022, were included in this one-month pilot prospective quality improvement study. The number of errors at discharge were documented, categorized by type, and adjudicated for severity of potential harm. Error severity was classified based on a modified National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Medication Error Index. Cost avoidance was calculated based on whether each error would have resulted in additional medical encounters and length of stay.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis. Forty errors were identified by pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at discharge, with a mean of 1.3 ± 1.9 errors per patient and 68% of patients having at least one error. The most common errors were duplication of therapy (25%) and medication access barriers at discharge (25%). The severity of errors included low (22.5%), serious (75%), and life-threatening harm (2.5%). Thirty-five percent of errors could have led to emergency visits or hospital readmissions. The estimated total cost for errors was $25 600. Pharmacist labor cost for reconciliation was $816. Cost avoidance was $24 784 from the 14 errors at discharge that could have resulted in additional emergency or inpatient visits.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation at discharge may prevent harm from reaching patients, decrease cost from unnecessary health encounters, and stop the error from continuing across transitions of care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 8","pages":"787-794"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.1980","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141268481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1