PEC innovation最新文献_第5页

Video recording as a data collection method in vulnerable populations - methodological and ethical considerations 录像作为弱势群体的数据收集方法——方法学和伦理考虑

PEC innovation

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100432

Marte-Marie Wallander Karlsen , Kari Sørensen , Berit Hofset Larsen , Lena Günterberg Heyn , Jennifer Gerwing

Introduction

Video recording vulnerable situations in healthcare practice raises ethical challenges that require addressing throughout the research process. Such challenges are linked to protecting research participants and assessing when and how using video recordings is appropriate.

Aim

This article aims to present methodological and ethical considerations inherent in video recording vulnerable participants and to offer future researchers concrete guidance and inspiration as to how they might assess these aspects of their own planned video research.

Results and discussion

As a group of researchers who have used video recordings to collect data of patients in vulnerable situations, we reflect upon our own methodological and ethical choices against the backdrop of other research studies and ethical guidelines.

Conclusion

Video recordings provide a unique opportunity to observe human interaction and to understand more about how we relate to each other. This article contributes to knowledge regarding empirically and ethically sound practice. We have demonstrated how methodological and ethical considerations are intertwined and should be treated as such.

Innovation

There are no existing guidelines or tools specifically for conducting and reporting qualitative studies using video recording that link the ethical considerations to the methodological choices. This article could provide a point of departure for establishing a reflective tool.

视频记录医疗保健实践中的脆弱情况提出了需要在整个研究过程中解决的伦理挑战。这些挑战与保护研究参与者以及评估何时以及如何使用视频记录是适当的有关。本文旨在介绍视频记录弱势参与者所固有的方法和伦理考虑，并为未来的研究人员提供具体的指导和灵感，以便他们如何评估自己计划的视频研究的这些方面。作为一组使用视频记录来收集弱势患者数据的研究人员，我们在其他研究和伦理准则的背景下反思我们自己的方法和伦理选择。视频记录提供了一个独特的机会来观察人与人之间的互动，并更多地了解我们彼此之间的关系。这篇文章有助于知识关于经验和道德健全的做法。我们已经证明了方法和伦理考虑是如何交织在一起的，应该这样对待。创新没有现有的指导方针或工具专门用于进行和报告使用视频记录的定性研究，将伦理考虑与方法选择联系起来。本文可以为建立一个反思工具提供一个出发点。

{"title":"Video recording as a data collection method in vulnerable populations - methodological and ethical considerations","authors":"Marte-Marie Wallander Karlsen , Kari Sørensen , Berit Hofset Larsen , Lena Günterberg Heyn , Jennifer Gerwing","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100432","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100432","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Video recording vulnerable situations in healthcare practice raises ethical challenges that require addressing throughout the research process. Such challenges are linked to protecting research participants and assessing when and how using video recordings is appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This article aims to present methodological and ethical considerations inherent in video recording vulnerable participants and to offer future researchers concrete guidance and inspiration as to how they might assess these aspects of their own planned video research.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>As a group of researchers who have used video recordings to collect data of patients in vulnerable situations, we reflect upon our own methodological and ethical choices against the backdrop of other research studies and ethical guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Video recordings provide a unique opportunity to observe human interaction and to understand more about how we relate to each other. This article contributes to knowledge regarding empirically and ethically sound practice. We have demonstrated how methodological and ethical considerations are intertwined and should be treated as such.</div></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><div>There are no existing guidelines or tools specifically for conducting and reporting qualitative studies using video recording that link the ethical considerations to the methodological choices. This article could provide a point of departure for establishing a reflective tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145265879","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Engaged curiosity: “Hot spots” for clinical reasoning in complex patient encounters 激发好奇心：在复杂的病人遭遇中进行临床推理的“热点”

PEC innovation

Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100408

Michael Soh , Dolores Mullikin , Steven J. Durning , Jerusalem Merkebu

Objective

This study explores how, if at all, engaged curiosity - a genuine, emotionally engaged interest in learning more about the complexity of another's particular emotional perspective - emerges in the clinical reasoning process and its relationship with contextual factors and clinical reasoning performance.

Methods

Think-alouds transcripts from nineteen physicians in internal medicine from three military training facilities were thematically analyzed for instances of engaged curiosity and examined through the lens of contextual factors and clinical reasoning performance.

Results

Our findings indicate that engaged curiosity can be likened to placeholders that physicians employ early on to “bookmark” sources of patient concern. These sources, or hot spots, deserve follow up, particularly when cognitive resources are unavailable to “attend” to a deeper understanding of the patient's experience.