首页 > 最新文献

Alzheimer's & Dementia最新文献

英文 中文
Impaired adrenergic regulation of Kv channels underlies LC hyperactivity and early-onset sleep disruption in AD-like amyloidogenic mice 在ad样淀粉样变性小鼠中,Kv通道的肾上腺素能调节受损是LC过度活跃和早发性睡眠中断的基础。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-29 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71127
Yi-Ci Zhang, Xue-Ting Zhang, Peng-Yue Chen, Zi-Yue Zhou, Mao-Qing Huang, Kai-Wen He

INTRODUCTION

Sleep–wake disturbances frequently occur at early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and accelerate disease progression, but the underlying neural mechanisms are not fully understood.

METHODS

We examined sleep–wake behavior and locus coeruleus (LC) activity in young 5xFAD mice using electrophysiology and pharmacological approaches targeting adrenergic signaling and potassium channels.

RESULTS

5xFAD mice displayed dark phase–specific hyperarousal and impaired brain state transitions by 2 months of age. LC neurons exhibited increased tonic firing due to impaired Kv4 and Kv7 potassium channel conductance, resulting from soluble amyloid beta (Aβ)-induced disruption of α2A adrenergic receptor regulation. Pharmacological activation of α2A adrenergic receptors restored Kv4/7 function and normalized LC excitability. Local administration of guanfacine (α2A agonist) or retigabine (Kv7 modulator) significantly rescued sleep–wake disturbances.

DISCUSSION

These findings identify LC hyperexcitability as a mechanistic driver of early sleep disruption in AD and implicate α2A receptors and Kv7 channels as promising therapeutic targets for early intervention.

睡眠-觉醒障碍经常发生在阿尔茨海默病(AD)的早期阶段,并加速疾病进展,但其潜在的神经机制尚不完全清楚。方法采用针对肾上腺素能信号通路和钾离子通道的电生理学和药理学方法检测5xFAD小鼠的睡眠-觉醒行为和蓝斑(LC)活性。结果5xfad小鼠在2月龄时表现出暗相特异性高唤醒和脑状态转换受损。可溶性淀粉样蛋白β (Aβ)诱导的α2A肾上腺素能受体调节被破坏,导致Kv4和Kv7钾通道电导受损,LC神经元表现出强直性放电增加。α2A肾上腺素能受体的药理激活恢复Kv4/7功能,使LC兴奋性正常化。局部给予胍法辛(α2A激动剂)或瑞加滨(Kv7调节剂)可显著缓解睡眠-觉醒障碍。这些发现确定了LC高兴奋性是AD患者早期睡眠中断的机制驱动因素,并暗示α2A受体和Kv7通道是早期干预的有希望的治疗靶点。
{"title":"Impaired adrenergic regulation of Kv channels underlies LC hyperactivity and early-onset sleep disruption in AD-like amyloidogenic mice","authors":"Yi-Ci Zhang,&nbsp;Xue-Ting Zhang,&nbsp;Peng-Yue Chen,&nbsp;Zi-Yue Zhou,&nbsp;Mao-Qing Huang,&nbsp;Kai-Wen He","doi":"10.1002/alz.71127","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71127","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sleep–wake disturbances frequently occur at early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and accelerate disease progression, but the underlying neural mechanisms are not fully understood.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We examined sleep–wake behavior and locus coeruleus (LC) activity in young 5xFAD mice using electrophysiology and pharmacological approaches targeting adrenergic signaling and potassium channels.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>5xFAD mice displayed dark phase–specific hyperarousal and impaired brain state transitions by 2 months of age. LC neurons exhibited increased tonic firing due to impaired Kv4 and Kv7 potassium channel conductance, resulting from soluble amyloid beta (Aβ)-induced disruption of α2A adrenergic receptor regulation. Pharmacological activation of α2A adrenergic receptors restored Kv4/7 function and normalized LC excitability. Local administration of guanfacine (α2A agonist) or retigabine (Kv7 modulator) significantly rescued sleep–wake disturbances.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>These findings identify LC hyperexcitability as a mechanistic driver of early sleep disruption in AD and implicate α2A receptors and Kv7 channels as promising therapeutic targets for early intervention.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71127","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146073330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to – Counteracting white matter injury to mitigate APOE4-related ARIA 对抗白质损伤以减轻apoe4相关ARIA的反应。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71095
Zahra Shirzadi, Jasmeer P. Chhatwal

We thank the author of this letter for the careful reading of our research article and appreciate the thoughtful points raised. We agree that white matter hyperintensity (WMH) is an important consideration in the appearance of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), particularly ARIA-H, as highlighted in this paper.1 We believe that this association may be primarily driven by latent, “silent” cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) that has not yet manifested in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible microhemorrhages, and which may be exacerbated by the administration of anti-amyloid antibody therapies.

We would like to take this opportunity to emphasize the multifactorial nature of WMH, as demonstrated in several studies by our group and others.2-4 In the A4 dataset specifically, we observed that WMH volume and its rate of progression were independently associated with older age, CAA, gray matter atrophy, and systemic vascular risk.2 These findings underscore that WMH is not a singular phenomenon but rather reflects a complex interplay of CAA, neurodegenerative, and vascular processes.

In this context, we concur with the author that management of systemic vascular risk—including elevated blood pressure, diabetes, and other modifiable factors—should be prioritized in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Such interventions may not only help reduce WMH burden but could also potentially slow AD progression.5-8 This perspective aligns with growing evidence that vascular health is a critical component of brain aging and neurodegenerative disease prevention.

Finally, we agree that further research is warranted to examine whether aggressive control of systemic vascular risk factors can mitigate the emergence of ARIA in patients receiving amyloid-targeting treatments. Understanding this interaction will be essential for optimizing therapeutic strategies and improving safety profiles for individuals undergoing disease-modifying interventions.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

我们感谢这封信的作者仔细阅读我们的研究文章,并感谢他提出的有思想的观点。我们同意白质高强度(WMH)是淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIA)的一个重要考虑因素,特别是ARIA- h,如本文所强调的1我们认为,这种关联可能主要是由潜伏的、“沉默的”脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)驱动的,这种病尚未在磁共振成像(MRI)中表现出来——可见的微出血,并且可能因抗淀粉样抗体治疗而加剧。我们想借此机会强调WMH的多因素性质,正如我们小组和其他人在几项研究中所证明的那样。2-4在A4数据集中,我们观察到WMH体积及其进展速度与年龄、CAA、灰质萎缩和全身血管风险独立相关这些发现强调WMH不是一个单一的现象,而是反映了CAA、神经退行性和血管过程的复杂相互作用。在此背景下,我们同意作者的观点,即在阿尔茨海默病(AD)高危人群中,应优先考虑系统性血管风险(包括血压升高、糖尿病和其他可改变因素)的管理。这些干预措施可能不仅有助于减轻WMH负担,而且可能潜在地减缓AD的进展。这一观点与越来越多的证据一致,即血管健康是脑老化和神经退行性疾病预防的关键组成部分。最后,我们同意有必要进一步研究积极控制全身血管危险因素是否可以减轻接受淀粉样蛋白靶向治疗的患者出现ARIA。了解这种相互作用对于优化治疗策略和提高接受疾病改善干预的个体的安全性至关重要。作者声明无利益冲突。
{"title":"Response to – Counteracting white matter injury to mitigate APOE4-related ARIA","authors":"Zahra Shirzadi,&nbsp;Jasmeer P. Chhatwal","doi":"10.1002/alz.71095","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71095","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We thank the author of this letter for the careful reading of our research article and appreciate the thoughtful points raised. We agree that white matter hyperintensity (WMH) is an important consideration in the appearance of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), particularly ARIA-H, as highlighted in this paper.<span><sup>1</sup></span> We believe that this association may be primarily driven by latent, “silent” cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) that has not yet manifested in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible microhemorrhages, and which may be exacerbated by the administration of anti-amyloid antibody therapies.</p><p>We would like to take this opportunity to emphasize the multifactorial nature of WMH, as demonstrated in several studies by our group and others.<span><sup>2-4</sup></span> In the A4 dataset specifically, we observed that WMH volume and its rate of progression were independently associated with older age, CAA, gray matter atrophy, and systemic vascular risk.<span><sup>2</sup></span> These findings underscore that WMH is not a singular phenomenon but rather reflects a complex interplay of CAA, neurodegenerative, and vascular processes.</p><p>In this context, we concur with the author that management of systemic vascular risk—including elevated blood pressure, diabetes, and other modifiable factors—should be prioritized in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Such interventions may not only help reduce WMH burden but could also potentially slow AD progression.<span><sup>5-8</sup></span> This perspective aligns with growing evidence that vascular health is a critical component of brain aging and neurodegenerative disease prevention.</p><p>Finally, we agree that further research is warranted to examine whether aggressive control of systemic vascular risk factors can mitigate the emergence of ARIA in patients receiving amyloid-targeting treatments. Understanding this interaction will be essential for optimizing therapeutic strategies and improving safety profiles for individuals undergoing disease-modifying interventions.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of dementia in selected Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 选定的中东和北非(MENA)国家的痴呆患病率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71109
Mohsen Sedighi, Mohammad Hasan Shahabi, Alireza Amanollahi, Khurshid Alam, Soudabeh Shemehsavar, Zahra Shirzadi, Serena Sabatini, Ahmad R. Khatoonabadi, Matthew Prina, Akram A. Hosseini, Claire V. Burley, Jennifer Dunne, Simin Mahinrad, Iman Dajani, Ralph N. Martins, Blossom C. M. Stephan, Ali Chaari, Hamid R. Sohrabi

Data on dementia epidemiology in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined dementia prevalence across MENA. Databases were searched up to October 2024. Analyses were stratified by country and sex. Pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Fifty-two studies on the selected countries met inclusion criteria, covering 87,219 individuals with dementia from a total population of 1,045,908. The pooled prevalence was 12.16% (95% CI: 9.61–14.96) for the region and the Israel had the highest prevalence (17.00%), followed by Iran (13.20%), Turkey (11.40%), Saudi Arabia (8.34%), and Egypt (6.86%). Dementia was more common in women than men (13.84% vs. 8.69%). Dementia is prevalent in MENA, with significant variation across countries. The region's aging population highlights the need for ongoing monitoring of dementia trends.

关于中东和北非地区痴呆症流行病学的数据有限。本系统综述和荟萃分析考察了中东和北非地区的痴呆患病率。数据库检索截止到2024年10月。分析按国家和性别分层。使用随机效应模型估计合并患病率,置信区间为95%。选定国家的52项研究符合纳入标准,涵盖了1,045908名痴呆症患者中的87,219人。该地区的总患病率为12.16% (95% CI: 9.61-14.96),其中以色列的患病率最高(17.00%),其次是伊朗(13.20%)、土耳其(11.40%)、沙特阿拉伯(8.34%)和埃及(6.86%)。女性比男性更常见(13.84%比8.69%)。痴呆症在中东和北非地区很普遍,各国差异很大。该地区的人口老龄化突出表明需要持续监测痴呆症趋势。
{"title":"Prevalence of dementia in selected Middle East and North Africa (MENA) countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mohsen Sedighi,&nbsp;Mohammad Hasan Shahabi,&nbsp;Alireza Amanollahi,&nbsp;Khurshid Alam,&nbsp;Soudabeh Shemehsavar,&nbsp;Zahra Shirzadi,&nbsp;Serena Sabatini,&nbsp;Ahmad R. Khatoonabadi,&nbsp;Matthew Prina,&nbsp;Akram A. Hosseini,&nbsp;Claire V. Burley,&nbsp;Jennifer Dunne,&nbsp;Simin Mahinrad,&nbsp;Iman Dajani,&nbsp;Ralph N. Martins,&nbsp;Blossom C. M. Stephan,&nbsp;Ali Chaari,&nbsp;Hamid R. Sohrabi","doi":"10.1002/alz.71109","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71109","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Data on dementia epidemiology in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined dementia prevalence across MENA. Databases were searched up to October 2024. Analyses were stratified by country and sex. Pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Fifty-two studies on the selected countries met inclusion criteria, covering 87,219 individuals with dementia from a total population of 1,045,908. The pooled prevalence was 12.16% (95% CI: 9.61–14.96) for the region and the Israel had the highest prevalence (17.00%), followed by Iran (13.20%), Turkey (11.40%), Saudi Arabia (8.34%), and Egypt (6.86%). Dementia was more common in women than men (13.84% vs. 8.69%). Dementia is prevalent in MENA, with significant variation across countries. The region's aging population highlights the need for ongoing monitoring of dementia trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71109","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146070254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of volunteering on cognition and cognitive decline in older diverse cohorts: KHANDLE and STAR 志愿服务对老年人认知能力和认知能力下降的影响:KHANDLE和STAR。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71169
Yi Lor, Hilary Colbeth, Marianne Chanti-Ketterl, Emily Hokett, Evan Fletcher, Zvinka Z. Zlatar, Nancy X. Chen, Nirmalbhai Tandel, Paola Gilsanz, Elizabeth Rose Mayeda, Rachel A. Whitmer
<div> <section> <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3> <p>Volunteering is linked to cognitive benefits in aging, but evidence in diverse populations is limited.</p> </section> <section> <h3> METHODS</h3> <p>We examined volunteering and cognition in Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study/Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans participants (<i>N</i> = 2789) with unimpaired cognition at baseline. Volunteering and frequency of volunteering in the past year at baseline were self-reported, and cognition (executive function [EF], verbal episodic memory [VEM]) was assessed with the Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scale across 4 waves (range of follow-up: 2–6 years). Linear mixed-effect models adjusted for demographics.</p> </section> <section> <h3> RESULTS</h3> <p>Participants were 73.8 ± 7.8 years on average; 62% women; 45% Black, 21% White, 18% Asian, and 17% Hispanic/Latin(x); and 47% reported volunteering. Volunteers had higher baseline EF and VEM than non-volunteers, with the largest gains among those volunteering a few times per week. Volunteering was not associated with rates of cognitive decline.</p> </section> <section> <h3> DISCUSSION</h3> <p>Volunteering was associated with better baseline cognition but not slower decline, suggesting immediate cognitive benefits for racially and ethnically diverse older adults.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Highlights</h3> <div> <ul> <li>Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study and Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans are a racially/ethnically diverse cohort (18% Asian, 47% Black, 17% Latin[x], 21% White) reporting volunteering within 12 months prior to baseline.</li> <li>Late-life (55+ years) volunteering is associated with better executive function (<i>β</i> = 0.173, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.114–0.232) and verbal episodic memory (β = 0.132, 95% CI: 0.071–0.192) after adjusting for age, gender/sex, education, race/ethnicity, instrumental activities of daily living, and self-rated health.</li> <li>Volunteering in late life, a few times per week, is associated with the highest magnitude of executive function (<i>β</i> = 0.216, 95% CI: 0.128–0.305) and once per week with verbal episodic memory (<i>β</i> = 0.189, 95% CI: 0.082–0.297) versus no volunteering, but the magnitude did not increase with more frequent voluntee
导读:志愿服务与老年人的认知益处有关,但在不同人群中的证据有限。方法:我们在Kaiser健康老龄化和多样化生活经历研究/健康老龄化研究中对基线认知未受损的非裔美国人参与者(N = 2789)的志愿服务和认知进行了研究。自我报告过去一年的志愿活动和志愿活动频率,并使用西班牙语和英语神经心理学评估量表分4个阶段(随访2-6年)评估认知(执行功能[EF]、言语情景记忆[VEM])。根据人口统计调整的线性混合效应模型。结果:参与者平均年龄73.8±7.8岁;62%的女性;45%的黑人,21%的白人,18%的亚洲人,17%的西班牙裔/拉丁裔(x);47%的人说自己做过志愿者。志愿者的EF和VEM基线高于非志愿者,每周做几次志愿者的收益最大。志愿活动与认知能力下降的速度无关。讨论:志愿服务与更好的基线认知能力有关,但没有减缓衰退,这表明对种族和民族不同的老年人的认知能力有直接的好处。重点:Kaiser健康老龄化和多样化生活经历研究和非裔美国人健康老龄化研究是一个种族/民族多样化的队列(18%的亚洲人,47%的黑人,17%的拉丁人[x], 21%的白人),他们在基线前12个月内报告了志愿活动。在调整了年龄、性别/性别、教育程度、种族/民族、日常生活工具活动和自测健康后,老年(55岁以上)志愿活动与更好的执行功能(β = 0.173, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.114-0.232)和言语情景记忆(β = 0.132, 95% CI: 0.071-0.192)相关。晚年志愿活动,每周几次,与执行功能的最高等级(β = 0.216, 95% CI: 0.128-0.305)和每周一次的言语情景记忆(β = 0.189, 95% CI: 0.082-0.297)相关联,但与不志愿活动相比,志愿活动的频率越高,执行功能的等级就越高。与没有参加志愿者活动的人相比,参加志愿者活动的人在特定领域的认知能力下降程度相似。
{"title":"The impact of volunteering on cognition and cognitive decline in older diverse cohorts: KHANDLE and STAR","authors":"Yi Lor,&nbsp;Hilary Colbeth,&nbsp;Marianne Chanti-Ketterl,&nbsp;Emily Hokett,&nbsp;Evan Fletcher,&nbsp;Zvinka Z. Zlatar,&nbsp;Nancy X. Chen,&nbsp;Nirmalbhai Tandel,&nbsp;Paola Gilsanz,&nbsp;Elizabeth Rose Mayeda,&nbsp;Rachel A. Whitmer","doi":"10.1002/alz.71169","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71169","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; INTRODUCTION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Volunteering is linked to cognitive benefits in aging, but evidence in diverse populations is limited.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We examined volunteering and cognition in Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study/Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans participants (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 2789) with unimpaired cognition at baseline. Volunteering and frequency of volunteering in the past year at baseline were self-reported, and cognition (executive function [EF], verbal episodic memory [VEM]) was assessed with the Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scale across 4 waves (range of follow-up: 2–6 years). Linear mixed-effect models adjusted for demographics.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Participants were 73.8 ± 7.8 years on average; 62% women; 45% Black, 21% White, 18% Asian, and 17% Hispanic/Latin(x); and 47% reported volunteering. Volunteers had higher baseline EF and VEM than non-volunteers, with the largest gains among those volunteering a few times per week. Volunteering was not associated with rates of cognitive decline.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; DISCUSSION&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Volunteering was associated with better baseline cognition but not slower decline, suggesting immediate cognitive benefits for racially and ethnically diverse older adults.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Highlights&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;div&gt;\u0000 &lt;ul&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study and Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans are a racially/ethnically diverse cohort (18% Asian, 47% Black, 17% Latin[x], 21% White) reporting volunteering within 12 months prior to baseline.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Late-life (55+ years) volunteering is associated with better executive function (&lt;i&gt;β&lt;/i&gt; = 0.173, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.114–0.232) and verbal episodic memory (β = 0.132, 95% CI: 0.071–0.192) after adjusting for age, gender/sex, education, race/ethnicity, instrumental activities of daily living, and self-rated health.&lt;/li&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;li&gt;Volunteering in late life, a few times per week, is associated with the highest magnitude of executive function (&lt;i&gt;β&lt;/i&gt; = 0.216, 95% CI: 0.128–0.305) and once per week with verbal episodic memory (&lt;i&gt;β&lt;/i&gt; = 0.189, 95% CI: 0.082–0.297) versus no volunteering, but the magnitude did not increase with more frequent voluntee","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rationale and design of a multidomain lifestyle program for mild cognitive impairment 轻度认知障碍的多领域生活方式方案的基本原理和设计
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71068
Amy D. Rodriguez, Jennifer R. DuBose, Agata Rozga, Craig M. Zimring, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Gari D. Clifford, Kayci L. Vickers, Felicia C. Goldstein, Emily L. Giannotto, Jacquelyn Thelin, Allan I. Levey

The development of non-pharmacological treatment approaches is supported by evidence that addressing key modifiable risk factors may prevent or delay up to 45% of dementia cases. The Charlie and Harriet Shaffer Cognitive Empowerment Program (CEP) was developed to address current gaps in access to, and evidence for, interventions that reduce lifestyle risk factors and improve quality of life in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Co-designed with patients and families, clinicians, researchers, and industry professionals, the CEP is situated in a conceptual framework that guides assessments and interventions/supports to holistically address the experience of living with MCI. CEP comprises four cores (Therapeutic Programs, Technology, Built Environment, and Innovation Accelerator) that map to the conceptual framework. We contend that our approach provides an opportunity to contribute to the evidence base for multidomain lifestyle programs and gain a deeper understanding of MCI and how individuals can be empowered to manage it.

Highlights

  • The cognitive empowerment program (CEP) is a multidomain lifestyle program that was developed using a co-design process and a conceptual framework that holistically addresses the experience of living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
  • CEP provides comprehensive assessment and intervention/support through four cores that map to the conceptual framework: therapeutic programs, technology, built environment and research innovation.
  • CEP's unique approach provides an opportunity to build the evidence base for multidomain lifestyle interventions and to develop and refine lifestyle biomarkers that can be used for early detection of MCI, tracking of disease progression, and objective measurement of the impact of lifestyle interventions.
非药物治疗方法的发展得到了证据的支持,即解决关键的可改变的风险因素可以预防或延迟高达45%的痴呆病例。查理和哈丽特·谢弗认知赋权项目(CEP)是为了解决目前在减少轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者生活方式风险因素和改善生活质量的干预措施的获取和证据方面的差距而开发的。与患者和家属、临床医生、研究人员和行业专业人士共同设计,CEP位于一个概念框架中,该框架指导评估和干预/支持,以全面解决MCI患者的生活体验。CEP包括四个核心(治疗方案、技术、建筑环境和创新加速器),它们映射到概念框架。我们认为,我们的方法提供了一个机会,为多领域生活方式项目的证据基础做出贡献,并对MCI以及个人如何管理它有了更深入的了解。认知赋权项目(CEP)是一个多领域的生活方式项目,使用共同设计过程和概念框架开发,全面解决轻度认知障碍(MCI)的生活体验。CEP通过映射到概念框架的四个核心提供全面的评估和干预/支持:治疗方案,技术,建筑环境和研究创新。CEP的独特方法为建立多领域生活方式干预的证据基础、开发和完善生活方式生物标志物提供了机会,这些生物标志物可用于MCI的早期检测、疾病进展的跟踪和生活方式干预影响的客观测量。
{"title":"Rationale and design of a multidomain lifestyle program for mild cognitive impairment","authors":"Amy D. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Jennifer R. DuBose,&nbsp;Agata Rozga,&nbsp;Craig M. Zimring,&nbsp;Elizabeth D. Mynatt,&nbsp;Gari D. Clifford,&nbsp;Kayci L. Vickers,&nbsp;Felicia C. Goldstein,&nbsp;Emily L. Giannotto,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Thelin,&nbsp;Allan I. Levey","doi":"10.1002/alz.71068","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71068","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The development of non-pharmacological treatment approaches is supported by evidence that addressing key modifiable risk factors may prevent or delay up to 45% of dementia cases. The Charlie and Harriet Shaffer Cognitive Empowerment Program (CEP) was developed to address current gaps in access to, and evidence for, interventions that reduce lifestyle risk factors and improve quality of life in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Co-designed with patients and families, clinicians, researchers, and industry professionals, the CEP is situated in a conceptual framework that guides assessments and interventions/supports to holistically address the experience of living with MCI. CEP comprises four cores (Therapeutic Programs, Technology, Built Environment, and Innovation Accelerator) that map to the conceptual framework. We contend that our approach provides an opportunity to contribute to the evidence base for multidomain lifestyle programs and gain a deeper understanding of MCI and how individuals can be empowered to manage it.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>The cognitive empowerment program (CEP) is a multidomain lifestyle program that was developed using a co-design process and a conceptual framework that holistically addresses the experience of living with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>CEP provides comprehensive assessment and intervention/support through four cores that map to the conceptual framework: therapeutic programs, technology, built environment and research innovation.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>CEP's unique approach provides an opportunity to build the evidence base for multidomain lifestyle interventions and to develop and refine lifestyle biomarkers that can be used for early detection of MCI, tracking of disease progression, and objective measurement of the impact of lifestyle interventions.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146070255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Counteracting white matter injury to mitigate APOE 𝜀4-related ARIA 对抗白质损伤以减轻APOE𝜀4相关ARIA
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71091
Yorito Hattori
<p>To the Editor:</p><p>The incidence and severity of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are consistently higher in <i>apoelipoprotein E4 (APOE4)</i> carriers enrolled in anti-amyloid antibody trials, with the greatest risk observed in those with <i>APOE4</i> homozygosity. Mechanistically, apoE4 inherently undermines cerebrovascular integrity through direct injury to the neurovascular unit and the promotion of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We previously showed that apoE4 drove the excessive production of cerebrovascular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the resultant neurovascular dysfunction, including endothelial dysfunction and neurovascular uncoupling.<span><sup>1</sup></span> At the cellular level, border-associated macrophages (BAMs), i.e., myeloid cells closely opposed to neocortical microvessels, act as apoE4-dependent sources and effectors of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-oxidase-derived ROS, which impair neurovascular function.<span><sup>2</sup></span> In parallel, apoE4 activates the cyclophilin A–matrix metallopeptidase 9 pathway, amplifying inflammation and blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Chronic ROS and inflammation exposure converge on BBB breakdown through reduced tight junction integrity, diminished transendothelial electrical resistance, and basement membrane thinning.<span><sup>3-5</sup></span> Within the cerebral amyloid angiopathy axis, apoE4 increases the amyloid beta (Aβ)<sub>40</sub>/Aβ<sub>42</sub> ratio, favors vascular over parenchymal deposition, and slows the clearance of Aβ–apoE4 complexes across the BBB.<span><sup>6, 7</sup></span> Collectively, these pathways plausibly increase the risk of ARIA in <i>APOE4</i> carriers.</p><p>We read with great interest the article entitled “Independent effects of white matter lesion volume and <i>APOE</i> ɛ4 on ARIA-H in A4 Study” by Shirzadi <i>et al</i>.<span><sup>8</sup></span> This elegant study demonstrates that the risk of spontaneous hemorrhagic lesions is low in both homozygous and heterozygous <i>APOE4</i> carriers with low volume of white matter lesion, suggesting that ARIA is, at least in part, modifiable in <i>APOE4</i> carriers and that the risk of ARIA may be attenuated if white matter lesion burden is minimized before and during anti-amyloid therapy. Consistent with this view, in a secondary data analysis of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ and ALZ-2 trials, mean arterial pressure < 93 mmHg with antihypertensive therapy independently predicted lower ARIA risk, whereas antidiabetic medications were associated with reduced risk in univariate analysis.<span><sup>9</sup></span> Hypertension and diabetes are leading drivers of white matter lesions; therefore, these data support the utility of strategies preserving cerebrovascular integrity in preventing ARIA. Additional common contributors to white matter lesions include smoking, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, obesity/metabolic syndrome, physical inactivit
致编者:在抗淀粉样蛋白抗体试验中,载脂蛋白E4 (APOE4)携带者的淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIA)的发生率和严重程度始终较高,APOE4纯合子携带者的风险最大。从机制上讲,apoE4通过直接损伤神经血管单位和促进脑淀粉样血管病而固有地破坏脑血管完整性。我们之前的研究表明,apoE4驱动了脑血管活性氧(ROS)的过量产生,并导致神经血管功能障碍,包括内皮功能障碍和神经血管解耦在细胞水平上,边界相关巨噬细胞(BAMs),即与新皮质微血管紧密对立的髓系细胞,作为apoe4依赖的烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸磷酸(NADPH)氧化酶衍生的ROS的来源和效应体,损害神经血管功能同时,apoE4激活亲环蛋白a -基质金属肽酶9通路,放大炎症和血脑屏障(BBB)破坏慢性ROS和炎症暴露会通过紧密连接完整性降低、跨内皮电阻降低和基底膜变薄导致血脑屏障破坏。3-5在脑淀粉样血管病轴中,apoE4增加淀粉样β (Aβ)40/Aβ42比值,有利于血管沉积而非实质沉积,并减缓Aβ - apoE4复合物在血脑屏障上的清除。我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Shirzadi等人发表的题为“A4研究中白质病变体积和APOE / 4对ARIA- h的独立影响”的文章。8这项优雅的研究表明,在白质病变体积小的纯合子和杂合子APOE4携带者中,自发出血性病变的风险都很低,这表明ARIA至少部分是:如果在抗淀粉样蛋白治疗前和治疗期间将白质病变负担降至最低,ARIA的风险可能会降低。与这一观点一致的是,在对TRAILBLAZER-ALZ和ALZ-2试验的二次数据分析中,抗高血压治疗的平均动脉压&lt; 93 mmHg独立预测较低的ARIA风险,而抗糖尿病药物在单变量分析中与降低风险相关高血压和糖尿病是白质病变的主要驱动因素;因此,这些数据支持保护脑血管完整性策略在预防ARIA中的效用。导致白质病变的其他常见因素包括吸烟、心房颤动、慢性肾病、肥胖/代谢综合征、缺乏身体活动、睡眠呼吸暂停和过量饮酒。因此,通过严格控制血压和血糖、戒烟、运动、优化睡眠、体重管理、适度饮酒、治疗房颤和睡眠呼吸暂停等多领域生活方式/血管干预,对启动抗淀粉样蛋白抗体的APOE4携带者可能特别有价值。翻译,apoe4导向的血管保护可以补充对危险因素的优化。首先,APOE4驱动sirtuin 1 (SIRT1)活性降低导致微血管内皮屏障功能障碍;因此,sirt1增强策略,包括生活方式调整和白藜芦醇,可以帮助血脑屏障稳定4,作为对抗apoe4诱导的微血管内皮细胞功能障碍的潜在策略,这有助于ARIA。其次,在BAMs中靶向抑制NADPH氧化酶,即gp91ds- that肽治疗,可降低ROS并使APOE4背景下的神经血管解耦和内皮功能障碍正常化2第三,实验中通过脑室/椎管内氯膦酸脂质体注射去除BAMs可减少脑血管ROS,改善体内神经血管功能。2,10虽然它们还没有准备好用于临床部署,后两种方法阐明了可处理的上游节点,即bamm衍生的ROS和内皮弹性,这可以通过更安全的药物方法来解决。 我们建议针对APOE4携带者正在进行的和未来的抗淀粉样蛋白试验和临床项目采取以下三个切实可行的步骤:根据白质病变负担对参与者进行基线分层和监测,通过结合白质高强度/病变的标准化量化来识别高风险个体并跟踪治疗后出现的变化;通过在抗淀粉样蛋白治疗过程中积极管理血压(适当时目标平均动脉压为93 mmHg)、糖尿病和其他白质病变危险因素,并提供依从性支持,制定了多领域血管护理方案;以及辅助血管保护策略,利用候选药物和生活方式/血管干预来增强内皮健康,例如那些针对sirt1相关途径的药物,并抑制脑血管氧化应激。总之,Shirzadi等人扩展了我们对apoe4相关ARIA的理解,指出通过最小化白质病变负担可以预防。再加上试验水平的信号表明,控制血管危险因素可以减轻ARIA,这些数据支持随机对照试验,测试多域生活方式/血管干预,并最终在APOE4携带者中,将血管保护佐剂与抗淀粉样蛋白抗体联合治疗。这些策略直接针对ARIA背后的血管病理,同时为那些遗传风险最大的人保留了改善疾病的治疗途径。作者声明无利益冲突。作者披露可在支持信息。
{"title":"Counteracting white matter injury to mitigate APOE 𝜀4-related ARIA","authors":"Yorito Hattori","doi":"10.1002/alz.71091","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71091","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;To the Editor:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The incidence and severity of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are consistently higher in &lt;i&gt;apoelipoprotein E4 (APOE4)&lt;/i&gt; carriers enrolled in anti-amyloid antibody trials, with the greatest risk observed in those with &lt;i&gt;APOE4&lt;/i&gt; homozygosity. Mechanistically, apoE4 inherently undermines cerebrovascular integrity through direct injury to the neurovascular unit and the promotion of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. We previously showed that apoE4 drove the excessive production of cerebrovascular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the resultant neurovascular dysfunction, including endothelial dysfunction and neurovascular uncoupling.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; At the cellular level, border-associated macrophages (BAMs), i.e., myeloid cells closely opposed to neocortical microvessels, act as apoE4-dependent sources and effectors of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-oxidase-derived ROS, which impair neurovascular function.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In parallel, apoE4 activates the cyclophilin A–matrix metallopeptidase 9 pathway, amplifying inflammation and blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Chronic ROS and inflammation exposure converge on BBB breakdown through reduced tight junction integrity, diminished transendothelial electrical resistance, and basement membrane thinning.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3-5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Within the cerebral amyloid angiopathy axis, apoE4 increases the amyloid beta (Aβ)&lt;sub&gt;40&lt;/sub&gt;/Aβ&lt;sub&gt;42&lt;/sub&gt; ratio, favors vascular over parenchymal deposition, and slows the clearance of Aβ–apoE4 complexes across the BBB.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6, 7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Collectively, these pathways plausibly increase the risk of ARIA in &lt;i&gt;APOE4&lt;/i&gt; carriers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We read with great interest the article entitled “Independent effects of white matter lesion volume and &lt;i&gt;APOE&lt;/i&gt; ɛ4 on ARIA-H in A4 Study” by Shirzadi &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; This elegant study demonstrates that the risk of spontaneous hemorrhagic lesions is low in both homozygous and heterozygous &lt;i&gt;APOE4&lt;/i&gt; carriers with low volume of white matter lesion, suggesting that ARIA is, at least in part, modifiable in &lt;i&gt;APOE4&lt;/i&gt; carriers and that the risk of ARIA may be attenuated if white matter lesion burden is minimized before and during anti-amyloid therapy. Consistent with this view, in a secondary data analysis of the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ and ALZ-2 trials, mean arterial pressure &lt; 93 mmHg with antihypertensive therapy independently predicted lower ARIA risk, whereas antidiabetic medications were associated with reduced risk in univariate analysis.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Hypertension and diabetes are leading drivers of white matter lesions; therefore, these data support the utility of strategies preserving cerebrovascular integrity in preventing ARIA. Additional common contributors to white matter lesions include smoking, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, obesity/metabolic syndrome, physical inactivit","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71091","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146070253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biomarkers in patients with clinical signs of mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease but without amyloid deposits on positron emission tomography: Results from Bio-Hermes Study participants 有轻度认知障碍或轻度阿尔茨海默病临床症状但在正电子发射断层扫描上没有淀粉样蛋白沉积的患者的生物标志物:来自Bio‐Hermes研究参与者的结果
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71085
Richard C. Mohs, Douglas W. Beauregard, Lynne Hughes, Cyndy B. Cordell, Allan I. Levey, Saima Rathore, Nicholas T. Seyfried, Erik C. B. Johnson, Jessie Nicodemus-Johnson, Joshua Christensen, Robin Wolz, John Dwyer

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) study participants may present with cognitive impairment who do not have brain amyloid deposits (Aβ−). Identifying predictive biomarkers for non-amyloid-related CI may provide better screening tests for trials seeking only CI Aβ+ participants and new therapy targets.

METHODS

Analysis of the Bio-Hermes biomarker database identified subpopulations of clinically normal, CN Aβ− (n = 313), CI Aβ− (n = 296), and CI Aβ+ (n = 258), and CN Aβ+ (n = 84) participants. Comparative analysis of demographics, clinical assessments, biomarkers, cytokines, and proteomics results was conducted.

RESULTS

Subgroup comparison of CI Aβ− versus CN Aβ− found that neurofilament light most clearly differentiated CI Aβ− from CN Aβ− participants. No other biomarker analysis reached a level of differential significance.

DISCUSSION

Analyses showed many novel biomarkers do not differentiate CI Aβ− from CN Aβ−. New biomarkers are needed to best determine the neuropathology of the clinical presentation of AD.

Highlights

  • NfL differentiated CN Aβ− versus cognitively impaired Aβ−.
  • Proteomics (two platforms) did not differentially assess cognitively impaired Aβ−-.
  • Many novel biomarkers did not differentially assess cognitively impaired Aβ−.
  • New biomarkers are needed to determine the neuropathology of AD clinical presentation.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)研究的参与者可能表现为认知障碍,但他们没有脑淀粉样蛋白沉积(Aβ−)。鉴定非淀粉样蛋白相关CI的预测性生物标志物可能为仅寻求CI Aβ+参与者和新治疗靶点的试验提供更好的筛选试验。方法对Bio - Hermes生物标志物数据库进行分析,确定临床正常、CN Aβ - (n = 313)、CI Aβ - (n = 296)、CI Aβ+ (n = 258)和CN Aβ+ (n = 84)参与者亚群。进行了人口统计学、临床评估、生物标志物、细胞因子和蛋白质组学结果的比较分析。结果CI Aβ -与CN Aβ -的亚组比较发现,神经丝光最明显地将CI Aβ -与CN Aβ -参与者区分开来。其他生物标志物分析均未达到差异显著性水平。分析表明,许多新的生物标志物不能区分CI Aβ−和CN Aβ−。需要新的生物标志物来最好地确定阿尔茨海默病临床表现的神经病理学。NfL分化CN Aβ -与认知受损的Aβ -。蛋白质组学(两种平台)对认知受损的Aβ−‐的评估没有差异。许多新的生物标志物对认知受损的Aβ−没有差异评估。需要新的生物标志物来确定阿尔茨海默病临床表现的神经病理学。
{"title":"Biomarkers in patients with clinical signs of mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease but without amyloid deposits on positron emission tomography: Results from Bio-Hermes Study participants","authors":"Richard C. Mohs,&nbsp;Douglas W. Beauregard,&nbsp;Lynne Hughes,&nbsp;Cyndy B. Cordell,&nbsp;Allan I. Levey,&nbsp;Saima Rathore,&nbsp;Nicholas T. Seyfried,&nbsp;Erik C. B. Johnson,&nbsp;Jessie Nicodemus-Johnson,&nbsp;Joshua Christensen,&nbsp;Robin Wolz,&nbsp;John Dwyer","doi":"10.1002/alz.71085","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71085","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) study participants may present with cognitive impairment who do not have brain amyloid deposits (Aβ−). Identifying predictive biomarkers for non-amyloid-related CI may provide better screening tests for trials seeking only CI Aβ+ participants and new therapy targets.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Analysis of the Bio-Hermes biomarker database identified subpopulations of clinically normal, CN Aβ− (<i>n = </i>313), CI Aβ− (<i>n</i> = 296), and CI Aβ+ (<i>n =</i> 258), and CN Aβ+ (<i>n = </i>84) participants. Comparative analysis of demographics, clinical assessments, biomarkers, cytokines, and proteomics results was conducted.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Subgroup comparison of CI Aβ− versus CN Aβ− found that neurofilament light most clearly differentiated CI Aβ− from CN Aβ− participants. No other biomarker analysis reached a level of differential significance.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Analyses showed many novel biomarkers do not differentiate CI Aβ− from CN Aβ−. New biomarkers are needed to best determine the neuropathology of the clinical presentation of AD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>NfL differentiated CN Aβ− versus cognitively impaired Aβ−.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Proteomics (two platforms) did not differentially assess cognitively impaired Aβ−-.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Many novel biomarkers did not differentially assess cognitively impaired Aβ−.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>New biomarkers are needed to determine the neuropathology of AD clinical presentation.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71085","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146070689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multi-omic expression of the VEGF family relates to Alzheimer's disease across diverse populations VEGF家族的多组学表达与不同人群的阿尔茨海默病有关。
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71100
Julia B. Libby, Kacie D. Deters, Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner, Minerva M. Carrasquillo, Mariet Allen, Philip De Jager, Vilas Menon, Bin Zhang, Vahram Haroutunian, Allan I. Levey, Nicholas T. Seyfried, Rima Kaddurah-Daouk, Steve Finkbeiner, Daifeng Wang, Anna K. Greenwood, Abby Vander Linden, Laura Heath, William L. Poehlman, Logan Dumitrescu, Vladislav A. Petyuk, David A. Bennett, Julie A. Schneider, Lisa L. Barnes, Timothy J. Hohman

INTRODUCTION

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling family plays a role in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous work has shown widespread effects of the members FLT1, FLT4, and VEGFB on AD outcomes. However, these analyses have focused within the non-Hispanic White (NHW) population.

NETHODS

The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of the VEGF family in underrepresented populations, leveraging large and diverse bulk RNA sequencing and tandem mass tag–mass spectrometry (TMT-MS) proteomic data. Outcomes included measures of AD pathology and diagnosis.

RESULTS

Within underrepresented populations, we replicated previously reported effects of FLT1 and FLT4, whereby higher protein abundance was observed in the AD brain and was associated with higher neuropathology burden. In stratified analyses, these associations were largely consistent across race and ethnicity.

DISCUSSION

This multi-omic study on the role of the VEGF family in AD emphasizes the need for more representative studies focused on therapeutic targets for AD.

Highlights

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes and proteins were quantified in four different brain regions. Samples included participants from four different populations.
  • Previously observed effects were replicated in diverse populations.
  • This study is the largest multi-omic study of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes among Alzheimer's disease (AD) participants from diverse populations.
血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)信号家族在包括阿尔茨海默病(AD)在内的神经退行性疾病中发挥作用。先前的研究表明,FLT1、FLT4和VEGFB成员对AD的预后有广泛的影响。然而,这些分析主要集中在非西班牙裔白人(NHW)人群中。方法:本研究的目的是分析VEGF家族在代表性不足的人群中的作用,利用大量和多样化的散装RNA测序和串联质谱标记-质谱(TMT-MS)蛋白质组学数据。结果包括AD病理和诊断指标。结果:在代表性不足的人群中,我们重复了先前报道的FLT1和FLT4的作用,即在AD大脑中观察到更高的蛋白质丰度,并与更高的神经病理学负担相关。在分层分析中,这些关联在种族和民族之间基本一致。讨论:这项关于VEGF家族在AD中的作用的多组学研究强调了对AD的治疗靶点进行更多有代表性的研究的必要性。重点:血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)基因和蛋白在四个不同的脑区域被量化。样本包括来自四个不同人群的参与者。先前观察到的效果在不同的人群中得到了重复。这项研究是对不同人群阿尔茨海默病(AD)参与者血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)基因进行的最大的多组学研究。
{"title":"Multi-omic expression of the VEGF family relates to Alzheimer's disease across diverse populations","authors":"Julia B. Libby,&nbsp;Kacie D. Deters,&nbsp;Nilüfer Ertekin-Taner,&nbsp;Minerva M. Carrasquillo,&nbsp;Mariet Allen,&nbsp;Philip De Jager,&nbsp;Vilas Menon,&nbsp;Bin Zhang,&nbsp;Vahram Haroutunian,&nbsp;Allan I. Levey,&nbsp;Nicholas T. Seyfried,&nbsp;Rima Kaddurah-Daouk,&nbsp;Steve Finkbeiner,&nbsp;Daifeng Wang,&nbsp;Anna K. Greenwood,&nbsp;Abby Vander Linden,&nbsp;Laura Heath,&nbsp;William L. Poehlman,&nbsp;Logan Dumitrescu,&nbsp;Vladislav A. Petyuk,&nbsp;David A. Bennett,&nbsp;Julie A. Schneider,&nbsp;Lisa L. Barnes,&nbsp;Timothy J. Hohman","doi":"10.1002/alz.71100","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71100","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling family plays a role in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous work has shown widespread effects of the members <i>FLT1</i>, <i>FLT4</i>, and <i>VEGFB</i> on AD outcomes. However, these analyses have focused within the non-Hispanic White (NHW) population.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> NETHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of the <i>VEGF</i> family in underrepresented populations, leveraging large and diverse bulk RNA sequencing and tandem mass tag–mass spectrometry (TMT-MS) proteomic data. Outcomes included measures of AD pathology and diagnosis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Within underrepresented populations, we replicated previously reported effects of <i>FLT1</i> and <i>FLT4</i>, whereby higher protein abundance was observed in the AD brain and was associated with higher neuropathology burden. In stratified analyses, these associations were largely consistent across race and ethnicity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This multi-omic study on the role of the <i>VEGF</i> family in AD emphasizes the need for more representative studies focused on therapeutic targets for AD.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes and proteins were quantified in four different brain regions. Samples included participants from four different populations.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Previously observed effects were replicated in diverse populations.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>This study is the largest multi-omic study of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) genes among Alzheimer's disease (AD) participants from diverse populations.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848908/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146058484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CTE neuropathology alone is associated with dementia and cognitive symptoms CTE神经病理学本身与痴呆和认知症状有关
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71032
Rachael M. Layden, Jenna R. Groh, Annalise E. Miner, Abigail Kidd, Sophia B. Nosek, Stephanie Gonzalez Gil, Bobak Abdolmohammadi, Steven Lenio, Christopher J. Nowinski, Yorghos Tripodis, Brett M. Martin, Joseph N. Palmisano, Brigid C. Dwyer, Douglas I. Katz, Lee E. Goldstein, Robert C. Cantu, Robert A. Stern, Thor D. Stein, Ann C. McKee, Daniel H. Daneshvar, Jesse Mez, Michael L. Alosco

INTRODUCTION

This studyexamined the independent contribution of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) neuropathology to symptoms.

METHODS

The sample included 614 brain donors with (n = 366) and without (n = 248) autopsy-confirmed CTE. Brain donors with other major neurodegenerative disease diagnoses were excluded. Informants completed cognitive and neuropsychiatric measures. Dementia was determined during diagnostic consensus conferences.

RESULTS

CTE stage IV (of IV) was associated with 4.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.97–10.90) increased odds of having dementia. CTE stage III had an odds ratio of 2.12 (95% CI = 1.91–3.77). Higher CTE stage was associated with greater informant-reported cognitive symptoms (p < 0.01). There were no associations with mood/behavioral scales.

DISCUSSION

CTE stage III/IV neuropathology was associated with dementia and cognitive symptoms: those with stage IV were 4.5 times more likely to have dementia than those without CTE. It is uncertain if low-stage CTE clinically manifests, and mood/behavioral symptoms likely have multifactorial causes and/or a fluctuating course.

Highlights

  • Stage III and IV chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) are independently associated with increased odds of having dementia.
  • Higher CTE stage was associated with greater informant-reported cognitive symptoms.
  • Stage I and II CTE were not associated with cognitive symptoms or dementia.
  • CTE of any severity was not associated with informant-reported mood or behavioral symptoms.
本研究考察了慢性创伤性脑病(CTE)神经病理学对症状的独立贡献。
{"title":"CTE neuropathology alone is associated with dementia and cognitive symptoms","authors":"Rachael M. Layden,&nbsp;Jenna R. Groh,&nbsp;Annalise E. Miner,&nbsp;Abigail Kidd,&nbsp;Sophia B. Nosek,&nbsp;Stephanie Gonzalez Gil,&nbsp;Bobak Abdolmohammadi,&nbsp;Steven Lenio,&nbsp;Christopher J. Nowinski,&nbsp;Yorghos Tripodis,&nbsp;Brett M. Martin,&nbsp;Joseph N. Palmisano,&nbsp;Brigid C. Dwyer,&nbsp;Douglas I. Katz,&nbsp;Lee E. Goldstein,&nbsp;Robert C. Cantu,&nbsp;Robert A. Stern,&nbsp;Thor D. Stein,&nbsp;Ann C. McKee,&nbsp;Daniel H. Daneshvar,&nbsp;Jesse Mez,&nbsp;Michael L. Alosco","doi":"10.1002/alz.71032","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This studyexamined the independent contribution of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) neuropathology to symptoms.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The sample included 614 brain donors with (<i>n</i> = 366) and without (<i>n</i> = 248) autopsy-confirmed CTE. Brain donors with other major neurodegenerative disease diagnoses were excluded. Informants completed cognitive and neuropsychiatric measures. Dementia was determined during diagnostic consensus conferences.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CTE stage IV (of IV) was associated with 4.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.97–10.90) increased odds of having dementia. CTE stage III had an odds ratio of 2.12 (95% CI = 1.91–3.77). Higher CTE stage was associated with greater informant-reported cognitive symptoms (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). There were no associations with mood/behavioral scales.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>CTE stage III/IV neuropathology was associated with dementia and cognitive symptoms: those with stage IV were 4.5 times more likely to have dementia than those without CTE. It is uncertain if low-stage CTE clinically manifests, and mood/behavioral symptoms likely have multifactorial causes and/or a fluctuating course.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Highlights</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <div>\u0000 <ul>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Stage III and IV chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) are independently associated with increased odds of having dementia.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Higher CTE stage was associated with greater informant-reported cognitive symptoms.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>Stage I and II CTE were not associated with cognitive symptoms or dementia.</li>\u0000 \u0000 <li>CTE of any severity was not associated with informant-reported mood or behavioral symptoms.</li>\u0000 </ul>\u0000 </div>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71032","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146048682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings” 对“评估ICD-10相关医疗保险索赔数据作为研究环境中痴呆病例确定方法”的更正
IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1002/alz.71161
<p>Bhattacharyya J, Barnes LL, Chen Y, et al. Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings. <i>Alzheimers Dement</i>. 2025;21(5):e70200. doi:10.1002/alz.70200</p><p>In the paper by Bhattacharyya et al. (Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings. <i>Alzheimers Dement</i>. 2025; 21:e70200. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70200), we identified errors requiring correction: an error in the early part of our coding which resulted in small changes in the performance metrics and regression model coefficients presented in the article, an error in the coding of the lookback period for one of the code definitions (Bynum Standard), and an error in our reporting citing use of a standard 1-year lookback rather than a standard 3-year lookback.</p><p>The overall conclusions of the paper did not change, although some details of the performance metrics did.</p><p>The authors regret these errors. We detail necessary changes to the text here and have reissued corrected versions of Tables 3–6 below, reflecting changes to performance metrics and regression model coefficients.</p><p>In the initial publication of this article, there is an erroneous statement in the Results section of the abstract, which reads: <i>“Accuracy of ICD-10 code definitions was high (87%–90%); 5 of 6 code definitions favored specificity over sensitivity.”</i> The corrected sentence should read<i>: “Accuracy of ICD-10 code definitions was high (86%–92%); all code definitions favored specificity over sensitivity.”</i></p><p>In the initial publication of this article, there is an erroneous statement at the end of Section 2.5, which reads: “All available Medicare FFS claims data from the 12-month period (± 6 months) surrounding a study visit were used to determine participants’ dementia status … we used a standard 1-year lookback period for all code definitions in analyses so that we could make direct comparisons.” The corrected sentence should read: “All available Medicare FFS claims data from the 36-month period prior to the study visit were used to determine participants’ dementia … we used a standard 3-year lookback period for all code definitions in analyses so that we could make direct comparisons.”</p><p>Similarly, there is an erroneous sentence included in the footnote of Table 1, which reads: <i>“Our analysis used a reference period of 1 year surrounding the index date.”</i> The corrected footnote should read: <i>“Our analysis used a reference period of 3 years prior to the index date.”</i></p><p>Section 3.2 requires updates reflecting updated numbers reported in Table 3 and should be replaced with the following:</p><p><i>“Table</i> 3 <i>shows performance metrics for each ICD-10 dementia code definition, overall and by subgroups. All 6 code definitions show similar overall accuracy (range: 86%–92%) and NPV (range: 94%–96%) compared to the RADC research standard.
巴塔查里亚J, Barnes LL,陈勇,等。评估相关ICD-10医疗保险索赔数据作为痴呆病例确定研究设置的方法。阿尔茨海默病。2025;21(5):e70200。doi: 10.1002 / alz。[70200]在Bhattacharyya等人的论文中(评估ICD-10医疗保险索赔数据作为研究环境中痴呆病例确定的方法)。阿尔茨海默病。2025;21: e70200。https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70200),我们发现了需要纠正的错误:编码早期的一个错误导致了文章中给出的性能指标和回归模型系数的微小变化,其中一个代码定义(Bynum标准)的回顾周期编码中的一个错误,以及我们报告中引用标准1年回顾而不是标准3年回顾的错误。论文的总体结论没有改变,尽管绩效指标的一些细节发生了变化。作者对这些错误感到遗憾。我们在这里详细说明了对文本的必要更改,并重新发布了下面表3-6的更正版本,以反映性能指标和回归模型系数的更改。在本文最初发表时,摘要的Results部分有一个错误的陈述:“ICD-10代码定义的准确率很高(87%-90%);6个代码定义中有5个更倾向于特异性而不是敏感性。”更正后的句子应该是:“ICD-10代码定义的准确性很高(86%-92%);所有的代码定义都倾向于特异性而不是敏感性。”在这篇文章的最初发表中,在2.5节的末尾有一个错误的声明:“所有可用的医疗保险FFS数据都是在研究访问的12个月(±6个月)期间用于确定参与者的痴呆状态……我们在分析中对所有代码定义使用了标准的1年回顾期,以便我们可以进行直接比较。”更正后的句子应该是:“在研究访问之前的36个月期间,所有可用的医疗保险FFS索赔数据都用于确定参与者的痴呆症……我们在分析中对所有代码定义使用了标准的3年回顾期,以便我们可以进行直接比较。”同样,在表1的脚注中包含了一个错误的句子:“我们的分析使用了索引日期周围1年的参考期。”更正后的脚注应该是:“我们的分析使用了索引日期之前3年的参考期。”第3.2节要求更新反映表3中报告的更新数字,并应替换为以下内容:“表3显示了每个ICD-10痴呆代码定义的总体和子组的性能指标。与RADC研究标准相比,所有6个代码定义显示出相似的总体准确性(范围:86%-92%)和净现值(范围:94%-96%)。所有六种代码定义都以较低的灵敏度为代价具有高特异性。当在子组中评估性能指标时,结果是相似的。所有代码定义在子组中都显示出相似的准确性,所有代码定义都倾向于特异性而不是敏感性,Moura等人(2021)和NORC高度可能和可能(2024)代码定义的性能指标非常接近或相同。”“然而,尽管各子组算法的性能相似,但无论哪种算法,子组之间的性能差异很大。例如,准确率范围从75%到98%,NPV范围从85%到99%。与其他亚组相比,年龄较小的亚组(80岁以下)具有最高的准确性(范围:95%-98%)和最高的NPV(范围:99%-99%),但该组的PPV也最低(范围:15%-31%)。有卒中史的亚组准确率最低(范围:75%-83%),NPV最低(范围:85%-88%)。3.3节中的以下内容应省略,以反映对表5的更新:“虽然少数民族种族与假阳性分类之间的关联大大提高,但仅在观察到的一半代码定义中显着或略微显着。”最后,讨论中的以下句子应该省略:“考虑的所有ICD-10代码定义对于RADC痴呆分类具有相似的准确性(87%-90%)和NPV(96%-98%)。除了拜纳姆标准外,大多数人更倾向于特异性而不是敏感性,该标准的灵敏度更高,但特异性略低。要符合使用拜纳姆标准的痴呆标准,参与者必须至少有一份来自MedPAR(即住院或熟练护理机构)、家庭健康或临终关怀档案的符合条件的ICD-10代码的索赔,或至少有两份来自载体或门诊档案的符合条件的ICD-10代码的索赔(间隔至少7天)。这些标准可能使Bynum标准ICD-10代码定义的灵敏度更高。 并替换为以下内容:“考虑的所有ICD-10代码定义对于RADC痴呆分类具有相似的准确性(86%-92%)和NPV(94%-96%)。所有人都倾向于特异性而非敏感性。”我们为这个错误道歉。表3。与2015年10月至2019年12月拉什阿尔茨海默病中心标准相比,ICD-10代码定义的3年回顾绩效指标,总体和按亚组分列。准确度灵敏度规格ppvnpvradc痴呆状态患病率总体0.09 ccw0.890.610.910.420.96 bynum Standard0.920.570.950.540.96Moura等人0.900.610.930.480.96 jain等人0.920.430.970.610.94 norc Highly Likely and Likely0.900.610.930.480.96 norc Highly Likely, Likely和probly0.860.640.890.360.96 age年龄较小(&lt; 80) 0.010年龄较大(≥80)0.14 ccw0.960.610.960.180.990.0.850.610.880.460.93 bynum Standard0.980.480.980.270.990.880.570.930.570.93Moura et al.0.960.580.970.210.990.870.610.910.520.93Jain et al. 0.980.290.990.0.30.310.990.890.440.960.630.91 norc Highly Likely, Likely, LikelyProbably0.950.650.950.150.990.810.640.840.400.94EducationLower教育高等教育(& lt; 16) 0.09(≥16)0.10 ccw0.870.630.890.350.960.900.610.930.480.96bynum Standard0.910.570.940.460.960.920.560.960.590.95Moura et al.0.890.620.910.400.960.910.600.940.530.96Jain et al.0.930.470.970.580.950.920.420.970.620.94NORC极有可能和Likely0.890.620.910.400.960.910.600.940.530.96NORC极有可能,有可能的是,和Probably0.840.650.860.300.960.880.640.900.410.96SexMale0.09Female0.09CCW0.880.590.910.380.960.890.620.920.440.96Bynum Standard0.910.530.940.470.950.920.580.950.560.96Moura et al.0.890.570.920.410.960.910.620.940.500.96Jain et al.0.910.330.970.490.940.920.460.970.630.95NORC极有可能和Likely0.890.570
{"title":"Correction to “Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/alz.71161","DOIUrl":"10.1002/alz.71161","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Bhattacharyya J, Barnes LL, Chen Y, et al. Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings. &lt;i&gt;Alzheimers Dement&lt;/i&gt;. 2025;21(5):e70200. doi:10.1002/alz.70200&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the paper by Bhattacharyya et al. (Evaluating linked ICD-10 Medicare claims data as a method of dementia case ascertainment in research settings. &lt;i&gt;Alzheimers Dement&lt;/i&gt;. 2025; 21:e70200. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70200), we identified errors requiring correction: an error in the early part of our coding which resulted in small changes in the performance metrics and regression model coefficients presented in the article, an error in the coding of the lookback period for one of the code definitions (Bynum Standard), and an error in our reporting citing use of a standard 1-year lookback rather than a standard 3-year lookback.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The overall conclusions of the paper did not change, although some details of the performance metrics did.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The authors regret these errors. We detail necessary changes to the text here and have reissued corrected versions of Tables 3–6 below, reflecting changes to performance metrics and regression model coefficients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the initial publication of this article, there is an erroneous statement in the Results section of the abstract, which reads: &lt;i&gt;“Accuracy of ICD-10 code definitions was high (87%–90%); 5 of 6 code definitions favored specificity over sensitivity.”&lt;/i&gt; The corrected sentence should read&lt;i&gt;: “Accuracy of ICD-10 code definitions was high (86%–92%); all code definitions favored specificity over sensitivity.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the initial publication of this article, there is an erroneous statement at the end of Section 2.5, which reads: “All available Medicare FFS claims data from the 12-month period (± 6 months) surrounding a study visit were used to determine participants’ dementia status … we used a standard 1-year lookback period for all code definitions in analyses so that we could make direct comparisons.” The corrected sentence should read: “All available Medicare FFS claims data from the 36-month period prior to the study visit were used to determine participants’ dementia … we used a standard 3-year lookback period for all code definitions in analyses so that we could make direct comparisons.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Similarly, there is an erroneous sentence included in the footnote of Table 1, which reads: &lt;i&gt;“Our analysis used a reference period of 1 year surrounding the index date.”&lt;/i&gt; The corrected footnote should read: &lt;i&gt;“Our analysis used a reference period of 3 years prior to the index date.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Section 3.2 requires updates reflecting updated numbers reported in Table 3 and should be replaced with the following:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Table&lt;/i&gt; 3 &lt;i&gt;shows performance metrics for each ICD-10 dementia code definition, overall and by subgroups. All 6 code definitions show similar overall accuracy (range: 86%–92%) and NPV (range: 94%–96%) compared to the RADC research standard. ","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alz.71161","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146048817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1