Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000390
Chungmei Shih, C William Pike, Gavin Hui, Cassendra A Munro
Abstract:
Objective: The perioperative setting presents unique challenges that contribute to the development of pressure injury (PI). In this study, the authors explore the incidence and baseline characteristics of perioperative patients (adult, inpatient, and surgical patient population with at least 3 days' hospital stay) who undergo surgery and have PI outcomes.
Methods: This descriptive retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical record data of 55,270 patients from an academic health care system. Differences in baseline characteristics between patients with versus without PI were examined using the Fisher exact test, χ2 tests, and t tests.
Results: The incidence of perioperative pressure injury (PPI) was 0.5%. Of the PPI group, 65.7% developed PPI after cardiovascular surgery. The most prevalent PPI stage was unstageable, followed by Stage 2 and deep tissue injury. The most common locations for PPI were the back, followed by the buttocks and heels. The PPI group was older and had a higher average comorbidity score (P<.001). Comorbidity differences of those with and without PPI were observed in congestive heart failure (28.1% vs. 15.2%, P<.001), diabetes (28.5% vs. 19.2%, P<.001), renal disease (27.7% vs. 18.8%, P<.001), and severe liver disease (8.0% vs. 3.4%, P<.001). There were no differences in race, body mass index, or history of tobacco use between the PPI group and the non-PPI group.
Conclusions: This study identified that cardiovascular surgery remains a high risk for PPI in perioperative patients. Among the demographic characteristics, race is not a sufficient category for identifying risk for PPI as it lacks the accuracy in skin tone measurement.
{"title":"Perioperative Pressure Injuries: A Descriptive Study of Patient Characteristics.","authors":"Chungmei Shih, C William Pike, Gavin Hui, Cassendra A Munro","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The perioperative setting presents unique challenges that contribute to the development of pressure injury (PI). In this study, the authors explore the incidence and baseline characteristics of perioperative patients (adult, inpatient, and surgical patient population with at least 3 days' hospital stay) who undergo surgery and have PI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical record data of 55,270 patients from an academic health care system. Differences in baseline characteristics between patients with versus without PI were examined using the Fisher exact test, χ2 tests, and t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of perioperative pressure injury (PPI) was 0.5%. Of the PPI group, 65.7% developed PPI after cardiovascular surgery. The most prevalent PPI stage was unstageable, followed by Stage 2 and deep tissue injury. The most common locations for PPI were the back, followed by the buttocks and heels. The PPI group was older and had a higher average comorbidity score (P<.001). Comorbidity differences of those with and without PPI were observed in congestive heart failure (28.1% vs. 15.2%, P<.001), diabetes (28.5% vs. 19.2%, P<.001), renal disease (27.7% vs. 18.8%, P<.001), and severe liver disease (8.0% vs. 3.4%, P<.001). There were no differences in race, body mass index, or history of tobacco use between the PPI group and the non-PPI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified that cardiovascular surgery remains a high risk for PPI in perioperative patients. Among the demographic characteristics, race is not a sufficient category for identifying risk for PPI as it lacks the accuracy in skin tone measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000383
Juan Bi, Jianmei Shao, Wen Yao, Songmei Yang, Nana Liu, Aihua Liu
Objective: To investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and protective measures of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) among nurses in Hefei, China; create a predictive model for nurses' experiencing contact dermatitis; and assess the model's effectiveness.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey using the Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire 2002 was conducted among 273 nurses at a hospital in Hefei, China, from December 2022 to February 2023. Predictive factors for nurses' contact dermatitis were identified through regression analyses. A predictive model, represented by a nomogram, was established based on these factors, and its predictive performance was evaluated by calibration curve and the decision curve analysis plot.
Results: Contact dermatitis was found among 20.51% of nurses. Those with allergies were 4.34 times more likely to develop OCD (95% CI = 2.29-8.24), whereas individuals with dry skin had a 2.82 times higher risk (95% CI = 1.07-7.47). Using protective gloves and uniforms reduced the risk by 50% to 60%. The established nomogram model exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.734 (95% CI = 0.661-0.807), demonstrated satisfactory calibration, and showed a favorable net benefit.
Conclusions: Nurses with allergies or dry skin are more likely to develop OCD, but wearing gloves is a helpful preventive measure. The created model predicts nurses' OCD risk, which can identify high-risk individuals for early intervention.
目的:了解合肥市护士职业性接触性皮炎(OCD)患病率、危险因素及防护措施;建立护士接触性皮炎的预测模型;并评估模型的有效性。方法:于2022年12月至2023年2月对中国合肥某医院的273名护士进行横断面调查,采用北欧职业皮肤问卷2002。通过回归分析确定护士接触性皮炎的预测因素。基于这些因素建立了以nomogram表示的预测模型,并通过标定曲线和决策曲线分析图对其预测性能进行了评价。结果:20.51%的护士存在接触性皮炎。过敏的人患强迫症的可能性是其他人的4.34倍(95% CI = 2.29-8.24),而皮肤干燥的人患强迫症的风险是其他人的2.82倍(95% CI = 1.07-7.47)。使用防护手套和制服可将风险降低50%至60%。所建立的nomogram模型在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积为0.734 (95% CI = 0.661-0.807),具有令人满意的校准效果,显示出良好的净效益。结论:皮肤过敏或干燥的护士更易发生强迫症,戴手套是有效的预防措施。该模型可以预测护士的强迫症风险,从而识别出需要早期干预的高危人群。
{"title":"Risk Factors and Predictive Model for Occupational Contact Dermatitis Among Nurses in Hefei, China: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Juan Bi, Jianmei Shao, Wen Yao, Songmei Yang, Nana Liu, Aihua Liu","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000383","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and protective measures of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) among nurses in Hefei, China; create a predictive model for nurses' experiencing contact dermatitis; and assess the model's effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey using the Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire 2002 was conducted among 273 nurses at a hospital in Hefei, China, from December 2022 to February 2023. Predictive factors for nurses' contact dermatitis were identified through regression analyses. A predictive model, represented by a nomogram, was established based on these factors, and its predictive performance was evaluated by calibration curve and the decision curve analysis plot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contact dermatitis was found among 20.51% of nurses. Those with allergies were 4.34 times more likely to develop OCD (95% CI = 2.29-8.24), whereas individuals with dry skin had a 2.82 times higher risk (95% CI = 1.07-7.47). Using protective gloves and uniforms reduced the risk by 50% to 60%. The established nomogram model exhibited an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.734 (95% CI = 0.661-0.807), demonstrated satisfactory calibration, and showed a favorable net benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nurses with allergies or dry skin are more likely to develop OCD, but wearing gloves is a helpful preventive measure. The created model predicts nurses' OCD risk, which can identify high-risk individuals for early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"E16-E22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145848650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The surgical site infection (SSI) rate is reportedly higher with foot and ankle surgeries than with other parts. This is problematic for rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus patients. Ultrafine bubble (UFB) technology is expected to elongate the duration for which the surgical site can remain disinfected, thanks to its stable nanobubble structure and disinfection effects by its own radical actions. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of preoperative skin cleaning utilizing UFB water before foot/ankle surgery.
Methods: This observational study retrospectively examined 219 extremities in 217 patients who had undergone foot/ankle surgery. Preoperative skin cleaning was performed using either conventional alcohol (concentration 80%) (conventional group; 113 extremities) or 500 mL of UFB water and conventional alcohol (UFB group; 106 extremities). Frequencies of postoperative events such as blister formation, eschar formation (width >10 mm) on the wound, and wound dehiscence after suture removal were compared, as was the time until suture removal.
Results: Rates of eschar formation and wound dehiscence after suture removal were significantly reduced in the UFB group. Time to suture removal was significantly shorter in the UFB group (12.9 d) than in the conventional group (15.5 d). All 3 cases with infected open wounds in the UFB water group achieved complete cure with wound closure within 2 weeks.
Conclusions: Preoperative skin cleaning using air UFB water appears safe and might help prevent eschar formation and wound dehiscence after foot/ankle surgeries. These effects could improve wound healing for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery.
目的:据报道,足部和踝关节手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率高于其他部位。这对类风湿关节炎和糖尿病患者是有问题的。超细气泡(UFB)技术由于其稳定的纳米气泡结构和自身自由基作用的消毒效果,有望延长手术部位保持消毒的时间。本研究评估足/踝关节手术前使用UFB水进行术前皮肤清洁的可行性和安全性。方法:本观察性研究回顾性检查了217例接受足/踝关节手术的患者的219个肢体。术前使用常规酒精(浓度80%)(常规组,113条肢体)或500 mL UFB水加常规酒精(UFB组,106条肢体)进行皮肤清洁。比较术后创面水疱形成、创面瘢痕形成(宽度bbb10 mm)、拆线后创面裂开等事件的频率,以及拆线前的时间。结果:UFB组术后瘢痕形成率和创面裂开率均明显降低。UFB组拆线时间(12.9 d)明显短于常规组(15.5 d)。UFB水组3例感染创面均在2周内完全愈合。结论:术前使用空气UFB水清洗皮肤是安全的,可能有助于防止足/踝关节手术后瘢痕形成和伤口开裂。这些效果可以改善接受足部和踝关节手术患者的伤口愈合。
{"title":"Feasibility and Safety of Utilizing Air Ultrafine Bubble Water for Preoperative Skin Cleaning Before Foot and Ankle Surgery.","authors":"Yuki Tabuse, Makoto Hirao, Takaaki Noguchi, Gensuke Okamura, Shigeyoshi Tsuji, Yuki Etani, Kosuke Ebina, Hyota Takamatsu, Shiro Ohshima, Seiji Okada, Jun Hashimoto","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000367","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000367","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The surgical site infection (SSI) rate is reportedly higher with foot and ankle surgeries than with other parts. This is problematic for rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus patients. Ultrafine bubble (UFB) technology is expected to elongate the duration for which the surgical site can remain disinfected, thanks to its stable nanobubble structure and disinfection effects by its own radical actions. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of preoperative skin cleaning utilizing UFB water before foot/ankle surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study retrospectively examined 219 extremities in 217 patients who had undergone foot/ankle surgery. Preoperative skin cleaning was performed using either conventional alcohol (concentration 80%) (conventional group; 113 extremities) or 500 mL of UFB water and conventional alcohol (UFB group; 106 extremities). Frequencies of postoperative events such as blister formation, eschar formation (width >10 mm) on the wound, and wound dehiscence after suture removal were compared, as was the time until suture removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rates of eschar formation and wound dehiscence after suture removal were significantly reduced in the UFB group. Time to suture removal was significantly shorter in the UFB group (12.9 d) than in the conventional group (15.5 d). All 3 cases with infected open wounds in the UFB water group achieved complete cure with wound closure within 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative skin cleaning using air UFB water appears safe and might help prevent eschar formation and wound dehiscence after foot/ankle surgeries. These effects could improve wound healing for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"E29-E34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145123958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000388
Anna Polak, Bogna Szołtys-Brzezowska, Laura Piejko
Objective: To systematically review in vivo animal studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) analyzing the effects of electrical currents on cytokine and growth factor levels involved in wound healing.
Data sources: PubMed, EBSCO, Ovid, Elsevier, and online gray literature databases were searched for relevant studies.
Study selection: Eligible studies were full-text, English-language in vivo reports or RCTs comparing at least 10 electrically stimulated (ES) wounds with 10 control wounds left untreated or treated with sham ES or nonphysical interventions.
Data extraction: Extracted data included ES-induced changes in cytokine and growth factor levels in wounds or blood. Methodologic quality was assessed using the SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool (animal studies) and the PEDro scale (RCTs).
Data synthesis: Eight studies (6 in vivo with 349 animals and 2 RCTs with 44 patients with diabetic foot ulcers) published between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed. ES protocols included direct current, low-voltage and high-voltage monophasic, biphasic, and alternating currents applied at sub-sensory to motor intensities. Most in vivo studies reported reduced cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10) and increased growth factors (VEGF, FGF-2, EGF, and TGF-β1). RCTs found ES increased VEGF in wounds and blood but did not affect soluble VEGF receptor-2 levels.
Conclusions: Electrical stimulation favorably modulates cytokine and growth factor expression, supporting faster wound healing. However, due to the limited number and heterogeneity of studies, further high-quality research is required to establish optimal ES parameters.
{"title":"Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Cytokines and Growth Factors Active in the Process of Wound Healing: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Animal Studies and Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Anna Polak, Bogna Szołtys-Brzezowska, Laura Piejko","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review in vivo animal studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) analyzing the effects of electrical currents on cytokine and growth factor levels involved in wound healing.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, EBSCO, Ovid, Elsevier, and online gray literature databases were searched for relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible studies were full-text, English-language in vivo reports or RCTs comparing at least 10 electrically stimulated (ES) wounds with 10 control wounds left untreated or treated with sham ES or nonphysical interventions.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Extracted data included ES-induced changes in cytokine and growth factor levels in wounds or blood. Methodologic quality was assessed using the SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool (animal studies) and the PEDro scale (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Eight studies (6 in vivo with 349 animals and 2 RCTs with 44 patients with diabetic foot ulcers) published between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed. ES protocols included direct current, low-voltage and high-voltage monophasic, biphasic, and alternating currents applied at sub-sensory to motor intensities. Most in vivo studies reported reduced cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10) and increased growth factors (VEGF, FGF-2, EGF, and TGF-β1). RCTs found ES increased VEGF in wounds and blood but did not affect soluble VEGF receptor-2 levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Electrical stimulation favorably modulates cytokine and growth factor expression, supporting faster wound healing. However, due to the limited number and heterogeneity of studies, further high-quality research is required to establish optimal ES parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"E43-E56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145848672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000382
Manli Tang, Jie Tan, Qin Xu, Jiangfeng Guo
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of the TIME-CDST (Tissue, Inflammation or Infection, Moisture, and Epidermal/Edge status-Clinical Decision Support Tool) in the prevention and management of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) in patients with severe trauma and obesity.
Methods: A total of 50 patients were assigned to the control group from February to April 2023, and 76 patients were designated as the intervention group from May to July 2023. In the control group, routine skin care measures were taken. The intervention group applied TIME-CDST for systematic hierarchical management, which included assessment, collaboration, control, decision-making, and evaluation. The incidence of IAD and fungal dermatitis, the severity of IAD, and healing time were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: The application of TIME-CDST led to a decrease in the incidence of IAD from 44.00% to 26.32% (χ 2 =4.244, P <.05) and a reduction in fungal dermatitis from 27.27% to 0.05% (χ 2 =4.683, P <.05). The intervention also reduced the severity of IAD ( Z =-2.331, P <.05) and shortened the healing time ( Z =-2.321, P <.05).
Conclusions: The use of TIME-CDST in patients with severe trauma and obesity could reduce the incidence and severity of IAD and promote early healing of dermatitis.
摘要:目的:探讨TIME-CDST(组织、炎症或感染、水分和表皮/边缘状态-临床决策支持工具)在预防和管理严重创伤和肥胖患者失禁相关性皮炎(IAD)中的有效性。方法:于2023年2月至4月选取50例患者作为对照组,5月至7月选取76例患者作为干预组。对照组采用常规皮肤护理措施。干预组采用TIME-CDST进行系统分级管理,包括评估、协作、控制、决策和评价。比较两组患者并发真菌性皮炎的发生率、病情严重程度及愈合时间。结果:应用TIME-CDST可使IAD的发病率从44.00%降至26.32% (χ2=4.244, p < 0.05)。结论:重度外伤合并肥胖患者应用TIME-CDST可降低IAD的发病率和严重程度,促进皮炎的早期愈合。
{"title":"Application of the TIME-CDST-based Approach in the Management of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis in Patients With Severe Trauma and Obesity.","authors":"Manli Tang, Jie Tan, Qin Xu, Jiangfeng Guo","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000382","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of the TIME-CDST (Tissue, Inflammation or Infection, Moisture, and Epidermal/Edge status-Clinical Decision Support Tool) in the prevention and management of incontinence-associated dermatitis (IAD) in patients with severe trauma and obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 50 patients were assigned to the control group from February to April 2023, and 76 patients were designated as the intervention group from May to July 2023. In the control group, routine skin care measures were taken. The intervention group applied TIME-CDST for systematic hierarchical management, which included assessment, collaboration, control, decision-making, and evaluation. The incidence of IAD and fungal dermatitis, the severity of IAD, and healing time were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application of TIME-CDST led to a decrease in the incidence of IAD from 44.00% to 26.32% (χ 2 =4.244, P <.05) and a reduction in fungal dermatitis from 27.27% to 0.05% (χ 2 =4.683, P <.05). The intervention also reduced the severity of IAD ( Z =-2.331, P <.05) and shortened the healing time ( Z =-2.321, P <.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of TIME-CDST in patients with severe trauma and obesity could reduce the incidence and severity of IAD and promote early healing of dermatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145916622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-07DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000385
Siddhartha Sood, Ryan Geng, Asfandyar Mufti, Safa Usman, R Gary Sibbald
<p><p>Offloading is an established foot care practice for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) involving the use of footwear, casts, and other devices to reduce plantar pressure, promote healing, and prevent ulcer formation. Currently, the criterion standard for offloading diabetic foot involves the irremovable total contact cast (TCC); however, application is resource-intensive, and patient adherence can be challenging because of functional limitations. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of removable offloading footwear for DFU healing and prevention. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched on July 25, 2023, with keywords relating to "diabetic foot" and "offloading devices." Two researchers screened articles initially by title and abstract, followed by full-text screening. Articles were included if they reported on patients with DFU who were treated with removable offloading devices. Data extraction was completed by 2 researchers independently. Data extracted included patient demographics, healing time, amputation rate, recurrence rate, and offloading devices used. Outcomes, including healing time, healing rate, amputation rate, and recurrence rate, were pooled. Studies were assessed for quality using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence. Twenty-three studies were included, reflecting 1694 patients. In 618 cases with an active ulcer, a mean healing rate of 71% was observed. The mean time required for healing was 68.4 days. Mean amputation rate was 15.4%. In 760 cases evaluating prevention of recurrence, the mean recurrence rate documented was 22.5% with a follow-up duration of 39.7 months. Three hundred sixteen cases evaluated the prevention of new DFUs, noting an ulcer incidence rate of 2%. Simple and removable offloading devices may be an accessible and low-cost option for the prevention of new or recurrent ulcers. Healing and amputation outcomes were not superior to published literature regarding TCC. Nonetheless, they may provide moderate utility in patients unable to tolerate TCC or in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>General purpose: </strong>To present the results of a systematic review evaluating the utility of accessible and removable offloading footwear for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) prevention, healing, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Target audience: </strong>This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin, wound, and diabetic foot care.</p><p><strong>Learning objectives/outcomes: </strong>After completing this continuing education activity, the participant will: Summarize the evidence the authors considered when evaluating the use of offloading footwear for DFUs.Identify the characteristics of the patients and clinical environments in which offloading devices were used.Illicit the results of the authors' study detailing the utility of basic offloading footwear for prevention, healing, and r
{"title":"Basic Low-cost Removable Footwear for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Offloading: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Siddhartha Sood, Ryan Geng, Asfandyar Mufti, Safa Usman, R Gary Sibbald","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000385","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Offloading is an established foot care practice for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) involving the use of footwear, casts, and other devices to reduce plantar pressure, promote healing, and prevent ulcer formation. Currently, the criterion standard for offloading diabetic foot involves the irremovable total contact cast (TCC); however, application is resource-intensive, and patient adherence can be challenging because of functional limitations. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of removable offloading footwear for DFU healing and prevention. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched on July 25, 2023, with keywords relating to \"diabetic foot\" and \"offloading devices.\" Two researchers screened articles initially by title and abstract, followed by full-text screening. Articles were included if they reported on patients with DFU who were treated with removable offloading devices. Data extraction was completed by 2 researchers independently. Data extracted included patient demographics, healing time, amputation rate, recurrence rate, and offloading devices used. Outcomes, including healing time, healing rate, amputation rate, and recurrence rate, were pooled. Studies were assessed for quality using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence. Twenty-three studies were included, reflecting 1694 patients. In 618 cases with an active ulcer, a mean healing rate of 71% was observed. The mean time required for healing was 68.4 days. Mean amputation rate was 15.4%. In 760 cases evaluating prevention of recurrence, the mean recurrence rate documented was 22.5% with a follow-up duration of 39.7 months. Three hundred sixteen cases evaluated the prevention of new DFUs, noting an ulcer incidence rate of 2%. Simple and removable offloading devices may be an accessible and low-cost option for the prevention of new or recurrent ulcers. Healing and amputation outcomes were not superior to published literature regarding TCC. Nonetheless, they may provide moderate utility in patients unable to tolerate TCC or in low-resource settings.</p><p><strong>General purpose: </strong>To present the results of a systematic review evaluating the utility of accessible and removable offloading footwear for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) prevention, healing, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Target audience: </strong>This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin, wound, and diabetic foot care.</p><p><strong>Learning objectives/outcomes: </strong>After completing this continuing education activity, the participant will: Summarize the evidence the authors considered when evaluating the use of offloading footwear for DFUs.Identify the characteristics of the patients and clinical environments in which offloading devices were used.Illicit the results of the authors' study detailing the utility of basic offloading footwear for prevention, healing, and r","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145987780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-17DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000359
Mümtaz Güran, Hasan Alp Tuncay, Fatma Dalokay, Mert Özkaloğlu, Ege Kaan Özel, Deniz Acaban, Hale Akkaya
Objective: Face masks are essential for disease prevention. However, prolonged use raises dermatological concerns. Addressing these issues can help develop guidelines that minimize risks and enhance comfort and adherence as a public health measure during future outbreaks. This study aimed to evaluate dermatological problems and pathogens related to face mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Data were collected through a structured questionnaire covering demographics, face mask usage habits, knowledge of mask use, and dermatological health. A pilot study was conducted to assess the questionnaire's reliability and validity. Microbiological samples were taken from participants' cheeks under the mask to identify common skin pathogens. Biostatistical methods were used to analyze the data.
Results: Dermatological problems, particularly acne and allergies, increased significantly during the pandemic, especially among surgical mask users. A notable rise in the prevalence of various bacteria and yeasts was observed in the samples. Knowledge of proper face mask usage was generally poor, with 81.1% of participants falling into poor/very poor categories. Surgical masks were used by 58.3% of participants, followed by cloth masks (33.1%) and KN95/N95 masks (8.7%). Most participants wore single-layer masks (70.9%), with 25.2% also using face shields. Female participants wore masks for significantly longer durations than males ( P = .04), whereas cloth mask users wore them for significantly shorter periods, regardless of sex ( P = .045).
Conclusions: Prolonged face mask use is associated with increased dermatological issues and growth of skin pathogens. These findings underscore the need for promoting proper mask use, improving knowledge, and addressing skin care needs for future health emergencies.
{"title":"Face Mask-Related Skin Conditions and Microbial Findings Among University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Mümtaz Güran, Hasan Alp Tuncay, Fatma Dalokay, Mert Özkaloğlu, Ege Kaan Özel, Deniz Acaban, Hale Akkaya","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000359","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Face masks are essential for disease prevention. However, prolonged use raises dermatological concerns. Addressing these issues can help develop guidelines that minimize risks and enhance comfort and adherence as a public health measure during future outbreaks. This study aimed to evaluate dermatological problems and pathogens related to face mask usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected through a structured questionnaire covering demographics, face mask usage habits, knowledge of mask use, and dermatological health. A pilot study was conducted to assess the questionnaire's reliability and validity. Microbiological samples were taken from participants' cheeks under the mask to identify common skin pathogens. Biostatistical methods were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dermatological problems, particularly acne and allergies, increased significantly during the pandemic, especially among surgical mask users. A notable rise in the prevalence of various bacteria and yeasts was observed in the samples. Knowledge of proper face mask usage was generally poor, with 81.1% of participants falling into poor/very poor categories. Surgical masks were used by 58.3% of participants, followed by cloth masks (33.1%) and KN95/N95 masks (8.7%). Most participants wore single-layer masks (70.9%), with 25.2% also using face shields. Female participants wore masks for significantly longer durations than males ( P = .04), whereas cloth mask users wore them for significantly shorter periods, regardless of sex ( P = .045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolonged face mask use is associated with increased dermatological issues and growth of skin pathogens. These findings underscore the need for promoting proper mask use, improving knowledge, and addressing skin care needs for future health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"49-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-15DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000362
Suleyman Caglar Ertekin, Nazim Serhat Parlak, Muhammer Ergenç
Abstract:
Objective: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common disease that is an important health problem. Using new flap methods in defect closure in PSD surgery may be useful in obtaining ideal surgical outcomes. This study aimed to present the early outcomes of the square excision and transposition flap (SF) technique compared with the modified Limberg flap (LF).
Methods: Patients who underwent surgical intervention for PSD utilizing SF and LF techniques between January 2016 and January 2022 were evaluated. Demographics, comorbidity, clinical presentation, pain assessment, hospital stay duration, healing time, time to return to work, and recurrence status were compared between the SF and LF groups.
Results: There was no significant difference between the SF (53 patients) and LF (49 patients) groups regarding demographic and most clinical characteristics. Patients in the SF group experienced shorter healing times of 11 days and quicker returns to work at 13 days compared with patients in the LF group ( P <.001). A lower incidence of wound infection was observed in the SF group (3.8%) compared with the LF group (16.3%) ( P =.035). Partial wound dehiscence was more observed in the LF group (18.4%), marking a significant difference ( P =.001). Regarding cosmetic satisfaction at the 6-month follow-up, the SF group reported higher satisfaction rates. The SF group had a lower recurrence rate.
Conclusions: The SF method had lower wound dehiscence, shorter healing time, and shorter return-to-work time compared with the modified LF. Patients have more cosmetic satisfaction. The SF technique can be considered as an option in the surgical treatment of PSD.
{"title":"Comparing Square Excision and Transposition Flap Versus Modified Limberg Flap in Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease Surgery: A New Technique With Fewer Wound Issues.","authors":"Suleyman Caglar Ertekin, Nazim Serhat Parlak, Muhammer Ergenç","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000362","DOIUrl":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000362","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common disease that is an important health problem. Using new flap methods in defect closure in PSD surgery may be useful in obtaining ideal surgical outcomes. This study aimed to present the early outcomes of the square excision and transposition flap (SF) technique compared with the modified Limberg flap (LF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent surgical intervention for PSD utilizing SF and LF techniques between January 2016 and January 2022 were evaluated. Demographics, comorbidity, clinical presentation, pain assessment, hospital stay duration, healing time, time to return to work, and recurrence status were compared between the SF and LF groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the SF (53 patients) and LF (49 patients) groups regarding demographic and most clinical characteristics. Patients in the SF group experienced shorter healing times of 11 days and quicker returns to work at 13 days compared with patients in the LF group ( P <.001). A lower incidence of wound infection was observed in the SF group (3.8%) compared with the LF group (16.3%) ( P =.035). Partial wound dehiscence was more observed in the LF group (18.4%), marking a significant difference ( P =.001). Regarding cosmetic satisfaction at the 6-month follow-up, the SF group reported higher satisfaction rates. The SF group had a lower recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SF method had lower wound dehiscence, shorter healing time, and shorter return-to-work time compared with the modified LF. Patients have more cosmetic satisfaction. The SF technique can be considered as an option in the surgical treatment of PSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"E23-E28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}