Cropping systems that conserve soil moisture are needed to improve yield or reduce irrigation water demand. This study assessed the ability of different tillage systems, subsoiling, and cover crops to conserve soil moisture, reduce soil water depletion, and augment infiltration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production on a Dubbs silt loam (Typic Hapludalfs) and a Bosket very fine sandy loam (Mollic Hapludalfs). This multi-year field study used a randomized complete block design to manage irrigation based on sensor data and matric potential thresholds, with agronomic and sensor-based methods used for data collection.Conventionally tilled soils had ≥ 59 % lower soil matric potential (less moisture; P > F < 0.0001) than conservation practices before irrigation. Cover crops increased soil moisture (-20 kPa) compared to winter fallow (-34 kPa). All conservation practices improved season-long soil moisture by ≥ -19 kPa over conventional tillage (P > F < 0.0001). Each Mg ha⁻¹ increase in preplant biomass raised soil matric potential by ≥ 7.3 kPa. Irrigation at −80 kPa to replenish soil moisture did not alter treatment differences. The conventional method (control) required irrigation every year with up to 7.8 cm more supplemental irrigation than the studied conservation practices. Cover crop treatments did not require irrigation at least 2 out of the 3 seasons in the experiment. Cost savings from reduced irrigation of up to $18 ha−1 do not fully compensate for crop yield penalties. Infiltration rates on bed tops increased by 23 % with cover crops (P > F = 0.0627). Cover crops and subsoiling enhanced infiltrated rainfall by 13 % (P > F = 0.003) and 16 % (P > F = 0.009), respectively, compared to winter fallow. Reduced tillage and cover crops improve season-long soil moisture and infiltration, offering a viable strategy for conserving irrigation water.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
