CONTEXT
Algorithm-based fertiliser recommendations offer substantial potential to improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) and support economic and environmental sustainability. However, adoption among farmers in the United Kingdom (UK) remains limited, partly due to algorithm aversion, i.e., the tendency to distrust or avoid algorithmic-generated recommendations, even when they provide benefits.
OBJECTIVE
This study examines algorithm aversion in fertiliser-related decision-making among UK farmers and agronomists. Aiming to identify key barriers to adopting decision-support tools (DSTs), improving understanding of stakeholder trust dynamics, and exploring strategies to improve uptake.
METHODS
An online survey of 50 farmers and 26 agronomists assessed confidence in algorithmic recommendations versus human advice, understanding of NUE, perceived adoption barriers, and openness to non-traditional fertiliser recommendations. A follow-up workshop with 10 participants in DSTs trials provided qualitative insights into trust and usability.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Farmers reported significantly greater trust in human advice compared to algorithmic recommendations (median 8 vs. 6, p < .001), whereas agronomists showed the reverse pattern (median 8 vs. 7.0, p < .001). Perceived barriers included cost concerns, poor system integration, complexity, and confusion over metrics. Whilst some farmers showed low levels of NUE literacy, agronomists demonstrated higher NUE literacy. Farmers relied on advice grounded in social trust and shared beliefs, while agronomists viewed algorithmic outputs as complements to technical expertise. Workshop participants found DST dashboards informative but often overwhelming.
SIGNIFICANCE
Addressing algorithm aversion through improved interface design, transparency, and tailored education, particularly via trusted advisors, may bridge the trust gap and facilitate digital tool adoption.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
