首页 > 最新文献

Agricultural Systems最新文献

英文 中文
Exploring entry points to circularity in food production from a farming system perspective 从农业系统的角度探索粮食生产循环的切入点
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104625
Jana Firse , Veera Naukkarinen , Marjaana Toivonen , Carl Timler , Jeroen Groot , Rogier Schulte , Kari Koppelmäki

Background

Redesigning food systems for circularity has been proposed as a strategy to reduce environmental impacts, reliance on external inputs, and to support a shift towards healthy diets. Finland's specialised and input-reliant food production systems combined with efforts to curb agricultural emissions and transition to more plant-based diets motivate exploration of future food system scenarios.

Aims

We explored two entry points to circular food production, localised food systems and the production of plant-based foods, and analysed their potential to enhance the environmental performance of Finnish farms. We further aimed to complement larger scale studies on circularity with a farm level perspective that accounts for heterogeneity and the farmers' perspective.

Methods

We generated alternative farm configurations for eight specialised arable farms in Finland. This explorative modelling study was based on three scenarios: (i) farm development based on the farmers' preferences, (ii) a localised farming system increasing nutrient and biomass cycling, (iii) maximising the production of plant-based foods.

Results

Localised and plant-based scenarios resulted in distinctly different production systems. While scenario (ii) reduced food production but lowered environmental impacts and input reliance, scenario (iii) led to highest reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and increases in overall food production. Farmer-led redesigns (i) showed large variability in perceived options for change reflecting farm-specific lock-ins and opportunities.

Conclusions

Our results underline the role of supporting objectives, such as self-sufficiency or dietary change in designing circular food systems. The heterogeneity across farms calls for a context-specific approach in supporting farmers to deliver on environmental goals.
已提出重新设计粮食系统以实现循环,作为减少对环境影响、对外部投入的依赖和支持向健康饮食转变的一种战略。芬兰的专业化和依赖投入的粮食生产系统,加上遏制农业排放和向更多植物性饮食过渡的努力,激发了对未来粮食系统情景的探索。我们探索了循环食品生产的两个切入点,本地化食品系统和植物性食品生产,并分析了它们提高芬兰农场环境绩效的潜力。我们进一步的目标是用农场层面的视角来补充更大规模的循环研究,这一视角考虑了异质性和农民的视角。方法对芬兰的8个专业耕地农场进行了不同的农场配置。这项探索性建模研究基于三种情景:(i)基于农民偏好的农场发展,(ii)增加养分和生物质循环的本地化农业系统,(iii)最大限度地提高植物性食品的生产。结果本地化和基于植物的情景导致了明显不同的生产系统。虽然情景(二)减少了粮食生产,但降低了环境影响和对投入的依赖,但情景(三)导致温室气体排放量减少最多,粮食总产量增加最多。农民主导的重新设计(i)显示,在可感知的变化选择方面存在很大差异,反映了特定农场的锁定和机会。结论研究结果强调了自给自足或饮食改变等支持目标在设计循环食品系统中的作用。农场之间的异质性要求在支持农民实现环境目标方面采取具体的方法。
{"title":"Exploring entry points to circularity in food production from a farming system perspective","authors":"Jana Firse ,&nbsp;Veera Naukkarinen ,&nbsp;Marjaana Toivonen ,&nbsp;Carl Timler ,&nbsp;Jeroen Groot ,&nbsp;Rogier Schulte ,&nbsp;Kari Koppelmäki","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104625","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104625","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Redesigning food systems for circularity has been proposed as a strategy to reduce environmental impacts, reliance on external inputs, and to support a shift towards healthy diets. Finland's specialised and input-reliant food production systems combined with efforts to curb agricultural emissions and transition to more plant-based diets motivate exploration of future food system scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We explored two entry points to circular food production, localised food systems and the production of plant-based foods, and analysed their potential to enhance the environmental performance of Finnish farms. We further aimed to complement larger scale studies on circularity with a farm level perspective that accounts for heterogeneity and the farmers' perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We generated alternative farm configurations for eight specialised arable farms in Finland. This explorative modelling study was based on three scenarios: (i) farm development based on the farmers' preferences, (ii) a localised farming system increasing nutrient and biomass cycling, (iii) maximising the production of plant-based foods.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Localised and plant-based scenarios resulted in distinctly different production systems. While scenario (ii) reduced food production but lowered environmental impacts and input reliance, scenario (iii) led to highest reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and increases in overall food production. Farmer-led redesigns (i) showed large variability in perceived options for change reflecting farm-specific lock-ins and opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our results underline the role of supporting objectives, such as self-sufficiency or dietary change in designing circular food systems. The heterogeneity across farms calls for a context-specific approach in supporting farmers to deliver on environmental goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104625"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145920753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Export-attributed carbon footprint of cotton production in arid China: A life cycle and driver analysis 中国干旱地区棉花生产的出口碳足迹:生命周期和驱动因素分析
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2026-01-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104632
Jian Liu , Yu Zhang , Cun Chang , Shuai Wu , Wei Yan , Yonglong Han , Yonghui Wang , Xiaofei Ma
<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Cotton is a globally traded commodity with disproportionately large environmental costs. Although its land share is modest, input use and energy demand are high in arid irrigated systems. The Tarim River Basin (TRB) in Xinjiang, China—one of the country's principal cotton-producing regions—remains underrepresented in long-term, spatially explicit carbon accounting, particularly with respect to responsibilities embedded in international trade. An assessment that connects farm-level processes, export attribution, and driver diagnosis is needed to guide equitable and efficient decarbonization.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Quantify the carbon footprint of cotton production in the TRB on 1 km grids for 2000–2020; develop and apply a transparent export-attribution framework that assigns to the region an equitable share of emissions embedded in cotton trade from China; and isolate principal biophysical and socioeconomic drivers using ridge regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify policy-sensitive levers for mitigation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a cradle-to-farm-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) at a 1 km spatial resolution from 2000 to 2020. We compiled activity data and emission factors to derive product-, area-, and value-based indicators, including <span><math><mi>CF</mi><mo>_</mo><mi>Y</mi></math></span> (kg CO₂-eq·kg<sup>−1</sup>), <span><math><mi>CF</mi><mo>_</mo><mi>A</mi></math></span> (kg CO₂-eq·hm<sup>−2</sup>), and carbon economic efficiency (<span><math><mi>CEE</mi></math></span>; kg CO₂-eq·CNY<sup>−1</sup>; CNY denotes the Chinese yuan). A national-proportional export-attribution scheme was applied to allocate export-embedded carbon emissions to the TRB. Based on this allocation, trade-intensity metrics were calculated, including <span><math><mi>CF</mi><mo>_</mo><msub><mi>Y</mi><mi>export</mi></msub></math></span> and <span><math><msub><mi>CEE</mi><mi>export</mi></msub></math></span>. Drivers were quantified through ridge regression and a confirmatory SEM spanning land use, vegetation condition, topography, climate, and socioeconomic context; direct and indirect effects were decomposed. Uncertainty was examined via sensitivity tests on key activity data and emission factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions</h3><div>Total emissions more than doubled from 2000 to 2020. In contrast, the intensity indicators changed differently: <span><math><mi>CF</mi><mo>_</mo><mi>Y</mi></math></span> remained near 2.83 kg CO₂-eq·kg<sup>−1</sup>, <span><math><mi>CEE</mi></math></span> decreased from 0.25 to 0.14 kg CO₂-eq·CNY<sup>−1</sup>, and <span><math><mi>CF</mi><mo>_</mo><mi>A</mi></math></span> increased from about 3900 to 5200 kg CO₂-eq·hm<sup>−2</sup>, indicating increasing land-based emission intensity. Dominant sources were labor (34.4 %), electricity (23.8 %), and diesel (14.8 %), highlighting priorities to modernize labor structure and decarbonize irrigation
棉花是一种全球交易的商品,其环境成本高得不成比例。尽管其土地份额不大,但干旱灌溉系统的投入物使用和能源需求很高。中国新疆的塔里木河流域(TRB)是中国主要的棉花产区之一,但在长期的、空间明确的碳核算中,特别是在国际贸易中所包含的责任方面,其代表性仍然不足。需要进行一项将农场层面的过程、出口归因和驱动因素诊断联系起来的评估,以指导公平和有效的脱碳。目的量化2000-2020年内蒙古自治区棉花生产的碳足迹。制定并应用透明的出口归因框架,在中国棉花贸易中公平分配该地区的排放份额;并利用脊回归和结构方程模型(SEM)分离主要的生物物理和社会经济驱动因素,以确定政策敏感的缓解杠杆。方法2000 - 2020年在1 km空间分辨率下进行了从摇篮到农场的生命周期评价。我们收集了活动数据和排放因子,得出了基于产品、面积和价值的指标,包括CF_Y (kg CO₂-eq·kg - 1)、CF_A (kg CO₂-eq·hm - 2)和碳经济效率(CEE; kg CO₂-eq·CNY - 1; CNY表示人民币)。采用国家比例出口归因方案将出口隐含碳排放分配给TRB。基于这一分配,计算了贸易强度指标,包括CF_Yexport和CEEexport。通过山脊回归和验证性SEM对驱动因素进行量化,包括土地利用、植被条件、地形、气候和社会经济背景;对直接效应和间接效应进行了分解。通过对关键活动数据和排放因子的敏感性测试来检查不确定性。结果与结论从2000年到2020年,总排放量增加了一倍多。相比之下,强度指标发生了不同的变化:CF_Y保持在2.83 kg CO₂-eq·kg - 1附近,CEE从0.25 kg CO₂-eq·CNY - 1下降到0.14 kg CO₂-eq·CNY - 1, CF_A从约3900 kg CO₂-eq·hm - 2增加到5200 kg CO₂-eq·hm - 2,表明陆基排放强度增加。主要能源来源为劳动力(34.4%)、电力(23.8%)和柴油(14.8%),突出了劳动力结构现代化和灌溉能源脱碳的重点。针对亚洲目的地的出口归因排放量累计达到2.70 × 109千克二氧化碳当量,各市场单位出口强度存在很强的异质性。驱动因素分析表明,优化的土地利用和社会经济升级与较低的足迹相关,而在缺乏先进管理的情况下,植被活动和气候变率的增加可能会增加排放。通过整合网格化的LCA、可复制的出口归因协议和驱动因素建模,该框架确定了可操作的热点,分配了供应链上的责任,并确定了清洁灌溉能源、定向机械化和优化土地分配等杠杆,以实现干旱、出口导向型农业的快速、公平减排。
{"title":"Export-attributed carbon footprint of cotton production in arid China: A life cycle and driver analysis","authors":"Jian Liu ,&nbsp;Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Cun Chang ,&nbsp;Shuai Wu ,&nbsp;Wei Yan ,&nbsp;Yonglong Han ,&nbsp;Yonghui Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104632","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104632","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Context&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Cotton is a globally traded commodity with disproportionately large environmental costs. Although its land share is modest, input use and energy demand are high in arid irrigated systems. The Tarim River Basin (TRB) in Xinjiang, China—one of the country's principal cotton-producing regions—remains underrepresented in long-term, spatially explicit carbon accounting, particularly with respect to responsibilities embedded in international trade. An assessment that connects farm-level processes, export attribution, and driver diagnosis is needed to guide equitable and efficient decarbonization.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Quantify the carbon footprint of cotton production in the TRB on 1 km grids for 2000–2020; develop and apply a transparent export-attribution framework that assigns to the region an equitable share of emissions embedded in cotton trade from China; and isolate principal biophysical and socioeconomic drivers using ridge regression and structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify policy-sensitive levers for mitigation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We conducted a cradle-to-farm-gate life-cycle assessment (LCA) at a 1 km spatial resolution from 2000 to 2020. We compiled activity data and emission factors to derive product-, area-, and value-based indicators, including &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CF&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mo&gt;_&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mi&gt;Y&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (kg CO₂-eq·kg&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;), &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CF&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mo&gt;_&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mi&gt;A&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (kg CO₂-eq·hm&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;), and carbon economic efficiency (&lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CEE&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt;; kg CO₂-eq·CNY&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;; CNY denotes the Chinese yuan). A national-proportional export-attribution scheme was applied to allocate export-embedded carbon emissions to the TRB. Based on this allocation, trade-intensity metrics were calculated, including &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CF&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mo&gt;_&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;msub&gt;&lt;mi&gt;Y&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;export&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/msub&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;msub&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CEE&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mi&gt;export&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/msub&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt;. Drivers were quantified through ridge regression and a confirmatory SEM spanning land use, vegetation condition, topography, climate, and socioeconomic context; direct and indirect effects were decomposed. Uncertainty was examined via sensitivity tests on key activity data and emission factors.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results and Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Total emissions more than doubled from 2000 to 2020. In contrast, the intensity indicators changed differently: &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CF&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mo&gt;_&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mi&gt;Y&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; remained near 2.83 kg CO₂-eq·kg&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;, &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CEE&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; decreased from 0.25 to 0.14 kg CO₂-eq·CNY&lt;sup&gt;−1&lt;/sup&gt;, and &lt;span&gt;&lt;math&gt;&lt;mi&gt;CF&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;mo&gt;_&lt;/mo&gt;&lt;mi&gt;A&lt;/mi&gt;&lt;/math&gt;&lt;/span&gt; increased from about 3900 to 5200 kg CO₂-eq·hm&lt;sup&gt;−2&lt;/sup&gt;, indicating increasing land-based emission intensity. Dominant sources were labor (34.4 %), electricity (23.8 %), and diesel (14.8 %), highlighting priorities to modernize labor structure and decarbonize irrigation","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104632"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Greenhouse gas emission characteristics of farmland in the Guanzhong region under varied water-nitrogen management measures based on the DNDC model 基于DNDC模型的关中地区不同水氮管理措施下农田温室气体排放特征
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104628
Siya Wang , Jiaxin Lu , Shikun Sun , Ruoqing Hu , Jiabei Li , Jie Pang , Yuxin Yang

Context

Irrigation and nitrogen application are essential agronomic practices for enhancing crop yields, yet they also represent potential levers for mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cropping systems.

Objective

This study aimed to identify optimal water‑nitrogen management strategies that maximize grain yield while minimizing GHG emissions in winter wheat-summer maize rotations within the Guanzhong Plain.

Methods

The Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model was rigorously calibrated and validated using empirical field datasets. Individual and synergistic effects of irrigation levels (spanning 0–120 % field capacity, FC) and nitrogen application rates (0–300 kg N ha−1) on GHG emissions were evaluated through systematic simulations of 88 distinct water‑nitrogen management scenarios.

Results and Conclusions

Maximum yields were achieved at 85 % FC irrigation coupled with 225 kg N ha−1 for winter wheat (8431 kg ha−1) and 85 % FC irrigation with 250 kg N ha−1 for summer maize (9806 kg ha−1), beyond which yields plateaued. Cumulative N2O emissions ranged from 0.07 to 0.75 kg N ha−1 (wheat) and 0.10–1.37 kg N ha−1 (maize). CO2 emissions initially increased with inputs before stabilizing at 3050 kg C ha−1 (wheat) and 2464 kg C ha−1 (maize) under optimal regimes. Precision management (85 % FC + crop-specific N) synchronizes yield optimization with GHG mitigation, achieving 18–22 % emission reduction relative to conventional practices while maintaining 95–97 % of maximum yield potential.

Significance

This work establishes a scientifically validated framework for climate-smart cereal production in semi-arid regions. The identified water‑nitrogen regimes (85 % FC + 225 kg N ha−1 wheat; 85 % FC + 250 kg N ha−1 maize) enable sustainable intensification by concurrently addressing food security and decarbonization goals in global cropping systems.
灌溉和施氮是提高作物产量的基本农艺措施,但它们也代表了减少种植系统中农业温室气体(GHG)排放的潜在杠杆。目的研究关中平原冬小麦-夏玉米轮作的最佳水氮管理策略,以实现粮食产量最大化和温室气体排放最小化。方法对反硝化分解(DNDC)模型进行了严格的标定,并利用现场经验数据进行了验证。通过系统模拟88种不同的水氮管理情景,评估了灌溉水平(0 - 120%田间容量)和氮肥施用量(0-300 kg N ha - 1)对温室气体排放的个体效应和协同效应。结果与结论85% FC灌溉配以225 kg N ha - 1的冬小麦产量最高(8431 kg ha - 1), 85% FC灌溉配以250 kg N ha - 1的夏玉米产量最高(9806 kg ha - 1),超过这一水平产量持平。N2O累积排放量为0.07 ~ 0.75 kg N ha - 1(小麦)和0.10 ~ 1.37 kg N ha - 1(玉米)。二氧化碳排放量最初随着投入的增加而增加,然后在最佳制度下稳定在3050千克碳公顷−1(小麦)和2464千克碳公顷−1(玉米)。精确管理(85% FC +作物特定氮)使产量优化与温室气体减排同步,相对于传统做法实现减排18 - 22%,同时保持最高产量潜力的95 - 97%。本研究为半干旱地区气候智能型谷物生产建立了一个经过科学验证的框架。确定的水氮制度(85% FC + 225公斤氮肥- 1小麦;85% FC + 250公斤氮肥- 1玉米)通过同时解决全球种植系统的粮食安全和脱碳目标,实现了可持续集约化。
{"title":"Greenhouse gas emission characteristics of farmland in the Guanzhong region under varied water-nitrogen management measures based on the DNDC model","authors":"Siya Wang ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Lu ,&nbsp;Shikun Sun ,&nbsp;Ruoqing Hu ,&nbsp;Jiabei Li ,&nbsp;Jie Pang ,&nbsp;Yuxin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104628","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104628","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Irrigation and nitrogen application are essential agronomic practices for enhancing crop yields, yet they also represent potential levers for mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in cropping systems.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to identify optimal water‑nitrogen management strategies that maximize grain yield while minimizing GHG emissions in winter wheat-summer maize rotations within the Guanzhong Plain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model was rigorously calibrated and validated using empirical field datasets. Individual and synergistic effects of irrigation levels (spanning 0–120 % field capacity, FC) and nitrogen application rates (0–300 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) on GHG emissions were evaluated through systematic simulations of 88 distinct water‑nitrogen management scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions</h3><div>Maximum yields were achieved at 85 % FC irrigation coupled with 225 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> for winter wheat (8431 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) and 85 % FC irrigation with 250 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> for summer maize (9806 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), beyond which yields plateaued. Cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions ranged from 0.07 to 0.75 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> (wheat) and 0.10–1.37 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> (maize). CO<sub>2</sub> emissions initially increased with inputs before stabilizing at 3050 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (wheat) and 2464 kg C ha<sup>−1</sup> (maize) under optimal regimes. Precision management (85 % FC + crop-specific N) synchronizes yield optimization with GHG mitigation, achieving 18–22 % emission reduction relative to conventional practices while maintaining 95–97 % of maximum yield potential.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This work establishes a scientifically validated framework for climate-smart cereal production in semi-arid regions. The identified water‑nitrogen regimes (85 % FC + 225 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> wheat; 85 % FC + 250 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> maize) enable sustainable intensification by concurrently addressing food security and decarbonization goals in global cropping systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104628"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research frameworks in agricultural living labs: A systematic review and comparative analysis 农业生物实验室研究框架:系统回顾与比较分析
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104629
Maryam Yousefi , Bettina Matzdorf , Frank Ewert

Context

Agricultural Living Labs (LLs) have emerged as a promising approach to foster innovation and sustainability in agroecosystems, addressing complex food system challenges. Despite the growing number of LL initiatives, little is known about the research frameworks that guide their design, implementation, and evaluation.

Objective

This study systematically reviews peer-reviewed literature to identify and synthesize the conceptual, methodological, and theoretical frameworks applied in agricultural LLs.

Methods

We developed an analytical framework derived from core LL characteristics to assess how these research frameworks address agricultural context integration, stakeholder involvement, innovation processes, and sustainability outcomes.

Results and conclusions

The results revealed six research frameworks, each characterized by a distinct analytical focus, including Coupled-Systems Perspective (enabling policy integration), Nexus Approach (cross-sectoral resource management), Participatory Action Research (PAR) (stakeholder empowerment), the Systems Innovation Approach (SIA) (supporting systemic innovation), Design-Oriented Case Study (digital solution design), and Boundary Objects Framework (cross-actor collaboration). These research frameworks play an essential role in structuring LL processes, particularly in defining system boundaries, actor involvement, and pathways for knowledge co-creation. However, our review highlights that in the agricultural LLs, most frameworks lack explicit consideration of economic sustainability or business model development, and few offer structured tools for long-term impact assessment, which can be a key factor for the long-term success of LLs.

Significance

This study contributes to reinforcing the foundations of agricultural LLs and guides researchers and practitioners to select or adapt suitable approaches for future LL initiatives in agriculture.
农业生物实验室(LLs)已成为一种有前途的方法,可促进农业生态系统的创新和可持续性,解决复杂的粮食系统挑战。尽管LL计划的数量在不断增加,但人们对指导其设计、实施和评估的研究框架知之甚少。目的本研究系统地回顾了同行评议的文献,以识别和综合适用于农业法律研究的概念、方法和理论框架。方法:我们开发了一个源自核心LL特征的分析框架,以评估这些研究框架如何处理农业背景整合、利益相关者参与、创新过程和可持续性结果。结果和结论结果揭示了六个研究框架,每个框架都有不同的分析重点,包括耦合系统视角(促进政策整合)、Nexus方法(跨部门资源管理)、参与式行动研究(PAR)(利益相关者授权)、系统创新方法(SIA)(支持系统创新)、设计导向案例研究(数字解决方案设计)和边界对象框架(跨参与者协作)。这些研究框架在构建LL过程中起着至关重要的作用,特别是在定义系统边界、参与者参与和知识共同创造途径方面。然而,我们的综述强调,在农业法律研究中,大多数框架缺乏对经济可持续性或商业模式发展的明确考虑,很少提供长期影响评估的结构化工具,而长期影响评估可能是法律研究长期成功的关键因素。本研究有助于加强农业LL的基础,并指导研究人员和实践者选择或适应适合未来农业LL倡议的方法。
{"title":"Research frameworks in agricultural living labs: A systematic review and comparative analysis","authors":"Maryam Yousefi ,&nbsp;Bettina Matzdorf ,&nbsp;Frank Ewert","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104629","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104629","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Agricultural Living Labs (LLs) have emerged as a promising approach to foster innovation and sustainability in agroecosystems, addressing complex food system challenges. Despite the growing number of LL initiatives, little is known about the research frameworks that guide their design, implementation, and evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study systematically reviews peer-reviewed literature to identify and synthesize the conceptual, methodological, and theoretical frameworks applied in agricultural LLs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed an analytical framework derived from core LL characteristics to assess how these research frameworks address agricultural context integration, stakeholder involvement, innovation processes, and sustainability outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>The results revealed six research frameworks, each characterized by a distinct analytical focus, including Coupled-Systems Perspective (enabling policy integration), Nexus Approach (cross-sectoral resource management), Participatory Action Research (PAR) (stakeholder empowerment), the Systems Innovation Approach (SIA) (supporting systemic innovation), Design-Oriented Case Study (digital solution design), and Boundary Objects Framework (cross-actor collaboration). These research frameworks play an essential role in structuring LL processes, particularly in defining system boundaries, actor involvement, and pathways for knowledge co-creation. However, our review highlights that in the agricultural LLs, most frameworks lack explicit consideration of economic sustainability or business model development, and few offer structured tools for long-term impact assessment, which can be a key factor for the long-term success of LLs.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This study contributes to reinforcing the foundations of agricultural LLs and guides researchers and practitioners to select or adapt suitable approaches for future LL initiatives in agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104629"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145880384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Climate change impacts on rainfed maize production of small-scale cropping systems in Eastern Cape, South Africa 气候变化对南非东开普省小规模种植系统雨养玉米生产的影响
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104627
Luleka Dlamini , Olivier Crespo , Jos van Dam , Deborah V. Gaso , Allard de Wit

Context:

Climate change poses a growing threat to rainfed maize production systems in southern Africa. The region is warming at nearly twice the global average, intensifying climate extremes and disrupting maize development, with small-scale farmers particularly vulnerable due to their limited adaptive capacity and resource access.

Objective:

This study assesses the potential impact of projected future climates on actual water-limited maize yield, phenology, and water stress in small-scale farming systems in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.

Methods:

We used five global climate models and the WOFOST model to simulate maize growth and yield under three emission scenarios. Maize responses were assessed at a farm level for the near future (2026–2055) and compared to the historical baseline period (1985–2014). We considered five planting dates and five maize varieties.

Results and Conclusions:

The results show that the annual average temperature is projected to increase by up to 8.3% coupled with a 95% increase in the number of summer days (day with maximum temperature over 30 °C) under SSP585. Precipitation trends were less consistent and highly variable across years and models. Simulations under conventional management predicted shorter growing cycle duration (by up to 25 days) and grain filling period (by up to 15 days), leading to significant yield losses (up to 14%) under high-emission scenarios, particularly on farms with existing high water stress. However, adaptation strategies, such as early planting and the use of medium-maturity varieties, significantly improved yield performance. These results highlight the combined effects of warming, phenological acceleration, and water stress on maize productivity, while emphasizing the value of localized adaptation.

Significance

: Adjusting planting dates and selecting suitable varieties offer low-cost adaptation options, but alone may not suffice under future climate conditions. Integrating these with broader strategies is essential for building long-term resilience and ensuring food security under increasingly uncertain agro-climate conditions.
背景:气候变化对南部非洲的雨养玉米生产系统构成越来越大的威胁。该地区的变暖速度几乎是全球平均水平的两倍,加剧了极端气候,扰乱了玉米的发展,由于小农的适应能力和资源获取有限,他们尤其容易受到影响。目的:本研究评估了预测的未来气候对南非东开普省小规模农业系统实际限水玉米产量、物候和水分胁迫的潜在影响。方法:利用5个全球气候模型和WOFOST模型对3种排放情景下的玉米生长和产量进行模拟。对近期(2026-2055年)的玉米响应进行了农场层面的评估,并与历史基准期(1985-2014年)进行了比较。我们考虑了五个种植日期和五个玉米品种。结果与结论:结果表明,在SSP585条件下,年平均气温将增加8.3%,夏季(最高气温超过30℃)日数将增加95%。降水趋势在不同年份和模式之间不太一致,变化很大。在传统管理下的模拟预测,生长周期(最多25天)和籽粒灌浆期(最多15天)缩短,导致高排放情景下的重大产量损失(最多14%),特别是在现有高度缺水的农场。然而,适应策略,如早期种植和使用中成熟品种,显著提高了产量表现。这些结果强调了气候变暖、物候加速和水分胁迫对玉米生产力的综合影响,同时强调了局部适应的价值。意义:调整种植日期和选择合适的品种提供了低成本的适应选择,但在未来的气候条件下,仅靠这些可能还不够。将这些战略与更广泛的战略相结合,对于在日益不确定的农业气候条件下建立长期抵御力和确保粮食安全至关重要。
{"title":"Climate change impacts on rainfed maize production of small-scale cropping systems in Eastern Cape, South Africa","authors":"Luleka Dlamini ,&nbsp;Olivier Crespo ,&nbsp;Jos van Dam ,&nbsp;Deborah V. Gaso ,&nbsp;Allard de Wit","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104627","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104627","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>Climate change poses a growing threat to rainfed maize production systems in southern Africa. The region is warming at nearly twice the global average, intensifying climate extremes and disrupting maize development, with small-scale farmers particularly vulnerable due to their limited adaptive capacity and resource access.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>This study assesses the potential impact of projected future climates on actual water-limited maize yield, phenology, and water stress in small-scale farming systems in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We used five global climate models and the WOFOST model to simulate maize growth and yield under three emission scenarios. Maize responses were assessed at a farm level for the near future (2026–2055) and compared to the historical baseline period (1985–2014). We considered five planting dates and five maize varieties.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions:</h3><div>The results show that the annual average temperature is projected to increase by up to 8.3% coupled with a 95% increase in the number of summer days (day with maximum temperature over 30 °C) under SSP585. Precipitation trends were less consistent and highly variable across years and models. Simulations under conventional management predicted shorter growing cycle duration (by up to 25 days) and grain filling period (by up to 15 days), leading to significant yield losses (up to 14%) under high-emission scenarios, particularly on farms with existing high water stress. However, adaptation strategies, such as early planting and the use of medium-maturity varieties, significantly improved yield performance. These results highlight the combined effects of warming, phenological acceleration, and water stress on maize productivity, while emphasizing the value of localized adaptation.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>: Adjusting planting dates and selecting suitable varieties offer low-cost adaptation options, but alone may not suffice under future climate conditions. Integrating these with broader strategies is essential for building long-term resilience and ensuring food security under increasingly uncertain agro-climate conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104627"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145837420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Willing or unable? The cognitive–resource mismatch behind farmers' adaptive behavior under agricultural disasters 愿意还是不能?农业灾害下农民适应行为背后的认知资源错配
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104612
Zhiyuan Zhu, Yongzhong Feng, Binkun Wu, Shuo Zhang, Xu Ma, Guangxin Ren, Gaihe Yang

CONTEXT

Climate-related disasters have become institutionalized risks in agricultural systems, with smallholder farmers particularly vulnerable. Conventional explanations focusing solely on “lack of perception” or “lack of resources” fail to fully account for under-adaptation. Emerging evidence suggests that structural misalignment between risk perception and resource capacity—termed “cognitive–resource mismatch”—is a critical constraint.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates how cognitive–resource mismatch suppresses adaptive behavior, identifies “willing but unable” (high perception–low resource) and “able but unwilling” (low perception–high resource) groups, and examines their differentiated effects on disaster recovery and household heterogeneity.

METHODS

Using survey data from 3240 households in the Guanzhong Plain, China, we constructed indices of risk perception and resource capacity, and developed a mismatch indicator. Econometric models—including OLS, Ordered Probit, 2SLS with instrumental variables, and Lewbel-IV—were employed, alongside heterogeneity and robustness analyses.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Both mismatch types significantly reduce adaptive behavior and weaken post-disaster recovery. The effect is strongest among female-headed, resource-poor, and disaster-inexperienced households. Results reveal non-linear complementarity between cognition and resources, showing that adaptation failure arises from systemic misalignment rather than isolated individual deficiencies.

SIGNIFICANCE

The study introduces the concept of alignment-sensitive governance, emphasizing differentiated policies to reduce mismatch. Financial and insurance instruments can empower the “willing but unable,” while behavioral activation and risk communication can mobilize the “able but unwilling.” This framework advances adaptation theory, highlights equity and climate justice dimensions, and provides actionable insights for precision governance in agriculture and beyond.
与气候有关的灾害已成为农业系统中的制度化风险,小农尤其容易受到影响。传统的解释仅仅关注于“缺乏认知”或“缺乏资源”,不能充分解释适应不足。新出现的证据表明,风险感知和资源能力之间的结构性错位——即“认知-资源错配”——是一个关键的制约因素。目的研究认知资源错配如何抑制适应性行为,识别“愿意但不能”(高感知-低资源)和“有能力但不愿意”(低感知-高资源)群体,并考察其对灾难恢复和家庭异质性的差异影响。方法利用关中平原3240户农户的调查数据,构建风险感知指数和资源能力指数,并构建错配指标。采用计量经济模型,包括OLS、Ordered Probit、2SLS与工具变量和lewbel - iv,以及异质性和稳健性分析。结果与结论两种失配类型均显著降低了适应性行为,削弱了灾后恢复能力。这种影响在女性户主、资源贫乏和缺乏灾害经验的家庭中最为明显。研究结果揭示了认知与资源之间的非线性互补关系,表明适应失败是由系统失调引起的,而不是孤立的个体缺陷。意义本研究引入对齐敏感治理概念,强调差异化政策以减少错配。金融和保险工具可以赋予“有意愿但没有能力”的人权力,而行为激活和风险沟通可以动员“有能力但不愿意”的人。该框架推进了适应理论,突出了公平和气候正义的维度,并为农业及其他领域的精准治理提供了可行的见解。
{"title":"Willing or unable? The cognitive–resource mismatch behind farmers' adaptive behavior under agricultural disasters","authors":"Zhiyuan Zhu,&nbsp;Yongzhong Feng,&nbsp;Binkun Wu,&nbsp;Shuo Zhang,&nbsp;Xu Ma,&nbsp;Guangxin Ren,&nbsp;Gaihe Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104612","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104612","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Climate-related disasters have become institutionalized risks in agricultural systems, with smallholder farmers particularly vulnerable. Conventional explanations focusing solely on “lack of perception” or “lack of resources” fail to fully account for under-adaptation. Emerging evidence suggests that structural misalignment between risk perception and resource capacity—termed “cognitive–resource mismatch”—is a critical constraint.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study investigates how cognitive–resource mismatch suppresses adaptive behavior, identifies “willing but unable” (high perception–low resource) and “able but unwilling” (low perception–high resource) groups, and examines their differentiated effects on disaster recovery and household heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Using survey data from 3240 households in the Guanzhong Plain, China, we constructed indices of risk perception and resource capacity, and developed a mismatch indicator. Econometric models—including OLS, Ordered Probit, 2SLS with instrumental variables, and Lewbel-IV—were employed, alongside heterogeneity and robustness analyses.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Both mismatch types significantly reduce adaptive behavior and weaken post-disaster recovery. The effect is strongest among female-headed, resource-poor, and disaster-inexperienced households. Results reveal non-linear complementarity between cognition and resources, showing that adaptation failure arises from systemic misalignment rather than isolated individual deficiencies.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>The study introduces the concept of alignment-sensitive governance, emphasizing differentiated policies to reduce mismatch. Financial and insurance instruments can empower the “willing but unable,” while behavioral activation and risk communication can mobilize the “able but unwilling.” This framework advances adaptation theory, highlights equity and climate justice dimensions, and provides actionable insights for precision governance in agriculture and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104612"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Soil health and agricultural land suitability assessment of highlands of the Eastern Ghats using geospatial index 基于地理空间指数的东高止山脉高原土壤健康与农用地适宜性评价
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104622
Rakesh Paul, Rangabhatla Saishree, Monalisa Ghadei, B. Anjan Kumar Prusty

CONTEXT

Land Suitability assessment emphasizes integrating the evaluation of biophysical and environmental attributes to determine sustainable land use. Koraput district of the Eastern Ghats, one of India's agrobiodiversity hotspots, lacks studies on land suitability mapping and index-based micro-scale quantification. This study addresses these gaps by developing a novel Agricultural Land Suitability Index (ALSI) integrating soil physicochemical, topographic, and climatic variables.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess soil health status and to understand its interrelationship with the agriculturally suitable areas through development of geospatial index using hybrid modelling.

METHODS

A total of 24 soil parameters and derived indices were analysed following standard protocols. Multi-criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used along with the Weighted Overlay Modelling (WOM), incorporating key geospatial indices like Normalised Difference Red Edge (NDRE) and Rainfall Erosivity (R-factor), to derive the index, i.e. ALSI. The said index was developed using the assigned weights and raster values of each variable and socio-economic information, collected through semi-structured interview, were also integrated to establish an interrelationship.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Soil health indicators have shown spatial heterogeneity across the Eastern Ghats highlands. A strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.883) between Agricultural Land Suitability and ALSI confirms that soil health is the primary determinant of land suitability. Out of 1078 low suitable grids (1 km2 dimension), there exist low (958 grids), moderate (114 grids), and high (06 grids) ALSI categories suggesting localized areas of better potential within a generally unsuitable landscape. A similar pattern was observed in case of the Moderate and High suitability classes. Approximately 70 % of high-suitability grids have shown low to moderate ALSI. This indicates that edaphic factors are controlling the agricultural output in the agrobiodiversity hotspot, along with the influence of climatic and topographic parameters. These areas have been identified as Priority Management Zones, which was also supported by the socio-economic factors, highlighting their implications in site-specific soil resilience planning and management.

SIGNIFICANCE

The findings provide a region-specific and soil-specific perspective of land evaluation. This approach enables targeted agricultural interventions and land suitability-based strategic crop management. Together, these approaches promote sustainable agriculture in the agriculture-dominated areas of the Eastern Ghats and beyond.
土地适宜性评价强调综合评价生物物理和环境属性,以确定土地的可持续利用。东高止山脉的Koraput地区是印度农业生物多样性热点地区之一,缺乏关于土地适宜性测绘和基于指数的微观尺度量化的研究。本研究通过开发一种整合土壤理化、地形和气候变量的新型农业用地适宜性指数(ALSI)来解决这些空白。目的利用混合模型建立地理空间指数,评价土壤健康状况,了解土壤健康状况与农业适宜区之间的相互关系。方法按标准方案对24项土壤参数及其衍生指标进行分析。采用多标准层次分析法(AHP)和加权叠加模型(WOM),结合归一化差红边(NDRE)和降雨侵蚀力(r因子)等关键地理空间指数,得出ALSI指数。上述指数是利用每个变量的指定权重和栅格值制定的,通过半结构化访谈收集的社会经济信息也被综合起来,以建立相互关系。结果与结论东高止山区土壤健康指标存在空间异质性。农业用地适宜性与ALSI呈显著正相关(R2 = 0.883),表明土壤健康是土地适宜性的主要决定因素。在1078个低适宜栅格(1平方公里尺寸)中,存在低(958个栅格)、中(114个栅格)和高(06个栅格)ALSI类别,表明在一般不适宜的景观中局部区域具有较好的潜力。在中度和高度适宜性类的情况下也观察到类似的模式。大约70%的高适宜性网格显示出低至中等ALSI。这表明,在农业生物多样性热点地区,土壤因素以及气候和地形参数的影响对农业产量起着控制作用。这些地区已被确定为优先管理区,这也得到了社会经济因素的支持,突出了它们对特定地点土壤恢复力规划和管理的影响。研究结果为土地评价提供了区域特异性和土壤特异性的视角。这种方法使有针对性的农业干预和基于土地适宜性的战略性作物管理成为可能。这些方法共同促进了东高止山脉及其他地区以农业为主的地区的可持续农业。
{"title":"Soil health and agricultural land suitability assessment of highlands of the Eastern Ghats using geospatial index","authors":"Rakesh Paul,&nbsp;Rangabhatla Saishree,&nbsp;Monalisa Ghadei,&nbsp;B. Anjan Kumar Prusty","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104622","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104622","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Land Suitability assessment emphasizes integrating the evaluation of biophysical and environmental attributes to determine sustainable land use. Koraput district of the Eastern Ghats, one of India's agrobiodiversity hotspots, lacks studies on land suitability mapping and index-based micro-scale quantification. This study addresses these gaps by developing a novel Agricultural Land Suitability Index (ALSI) integrating soil physicochemical, topographic, and climatic variables.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The study aimed to assess soil health status and to understand its interrelationship with the agriculturally suitable areas through development of geospatial index using hybrid modelling.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>A total of 24 soil parameters and derived indices were analysed following standard protocols. Multi-criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used along with the Weighted Overlay Modelling (WOM), incorporating key geospatial indices like Normalised Difference Red Edge (NDRE) and Rainfall Erosivity (R-factor), to derive the index, i.e. ALSI. The said index was developed using the assigned weights and raster values of each variable and socio-economic information, collected through semi-structured interview, were also integrated to establish an interrelationship.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Soil health indicators have shown spatial heterogeneity across the Eastern Ghats highlands<em>.</em> A strong positive correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.883) between Agricultural Land Suitability and ALSI confirms that soil health is the primary determinant of land suitability. Out of 1078 low suitable grids (1 km<sup>2</sup> dimension), there exist low (958 grids), moderate (114 grids), and high (06 grids) ALSI categories suggesting localized areas of better potential within a generally unsuitable landscape. A similar pattern was observed in case of the Moderate and High suitability classes. Approximately 70 % of high-suitability grids have shown low to moderate ALSI. This indicates that edaphic factors are controlling the agricultural output in the agrobiodiversity hotspot, along with the influence of climatic and topographic parameters. These areas have been identified as Priority Management Zones, which was also supported by the socio-economic factors, highlighting their implications in site-specific soil resilience planning and management.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>The findings provide a region-specific and soil-specific perspective of land evaluation. This approach enables targeted agricultural interventions and land suitability-based strategic crop management. Together, these approaches promote sustainable agriculture in the agriculture-dominated areas of the Eastern Ghats and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104622"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pathogen and pest communities in agroecosystems across climate gradients: Anticipating future challenges in the highland tropics 跨气候梯度农业生态系统中的病原体和害虫群落:预测高原热带地区未来的挑战
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104619
Romaric A. Mouafo-Tchinda , Aaron I. Plex Sulá , Berea A. Etherton , Joshua S. Okonya , Gloria Valentine Nakato , Yanru Xing , Jacobo Robledo , Ashish Adhikari , Guy Blomme , Déo Kantungeko , Anastase Nduwayezu , Jan F. Kreuze , Jürgen Kroschel , James P. Legg , Karen A. Garrett

CONTEXT

Tropical agricultural systems must respond to current and future pathogen and pest communities. An important research gap is how climate change may shift the geographic distribution of tropical pathogens and pests.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the geographic risk of 27 pathogens and pests in four food security crops (banana, cassava, potato, and sweetpotato) in the Great Lakes region of Africa, and potential future risk under climate change. We analyzed model performance for each pathogen and pest, assessing the potential for changes in geographic distribution, and for decision support systems to facilitate management.

METHODS

Cropland connectivity analysis identified locations likely important in the spread of crop-specific pathogens and pests. We surveyed the 27 economically important pathogens and pests in Rwanda and Burundi, mapping the distribution of each across climate gradients and quantifying associations. We used machine learning to model each species as a function of environmental variables, including host landscape. We also evaluated future temperatures across altitudes under climate change scenarios.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Among ten algorithms evaluated, random forests and support vector machines generally performed best for predicting severity or infestation. Host landscape variables were useful predictors for some species. Based on climate matching, 44 % of the pathogens and pests could become more common with warmer temperatures at higher altitudes, while 17 % may become less common.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings indicate how crop health in the region requires adaptation to multiple sustainability challenges. The results also indicate which pathogen and pest species have the potential for development of decision support models.
热带农业系统必须应对当前和未来的病原体和有害生物群落。一个重要的研究空白是气候变化如何改变热带病原体和害虫的地理分布。目的评估非洲大湖区4种粮食安全作物(香蕉、木薯、马铃薯和甘薯)27种病原菌和害虫的地理风险及其在气候变化下的潜在风险。我们分析了每种病原体和害虫的模型性能,评估了地理分布变化的潜力,以及促进管理的决策支持系统。方法农田连通性分析确定了作物特有病原体和害虫可能传播的重要地点。我们调查了卢旺达和布隆迪27种经济上重要的病原体和害虫,绘制了每种病原体和害虫在气候梯度中的分布分布图,并量化了它们之间的关联。我们使用机器学习来模拟每个物种作为环境变量的函数,包括宿主景观。我们还评估了气候变化情景下不同海拔地区的未来温度。结果与结论在所评估的10种算法中,随机森林和支持向量机的预测效果最好。寄主景观变量是一些物种的有效预测因子。根据气候匹配,44%的病原体和害虫可能会在高海拔地区变得更常见,而17%可能会变得不那么常见。这些发现表明,该地区的作物健康需要适应多种可持续性挑战。结果还表明哪些病原体和害虫具有开发决策支持模型的潜力。
{"title":"Pathogen and pest communities in agroecosystems across climate gradients: Anticipating future challenges in the highland tropics","authors":"Romaric A. Mouafo-Tchinda ,&nbsp;Aaron I. Plex Sulá ,&nbsp;Berea A. Etherton ,&nbsp;Joshua S. Okonya ,&nbsp;Gloria Valentine Nakato ,&nbsp;Yanru Xing ,&nbsp;Jacobo Robledo ,&nbsp;Ashish Adhikari ,&nbsp;Guy Blomme ,&nbsp;Déo Kantungeko ,&nbsp;Anastase Nduwayezu ,&nbsp;Jan F. Kreuze ,&nbsp;Jürgen Kroschel ,&nbsp;James P. Legg ,&nbsp;Karen A. Garrett","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104619","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104619","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3><em>CONTEXT</em></h3><div>Tropical agricultural systems must respond to current and future pathogen and pest communities. An important research gap is how climate change may shift the geographic distribution of tropical pathogens and pests.</div></div><div><h3><em>OBJECTIVE</em></h3><div>We evaluated the geographic risk of 27 pathogens and pests in four food security crops (banana, cassava, potato, and sweetpotato) in the Great Lakes region of Africa, and potential future risk under climate change. We analyzed model performance for each pathogen and pest, assessing the potential for changes in geographic distribution, and for decision support systems to facilitate management.</div></div><div><h3><em>METHODS</em></h3><div>Cropland connectivity analysis identified locations likely important in the spread of crop-specific pathogens and pests. We surveyed the 27 economically important pathogens and pests in Rwanda and Burundi, mapping the distribution of each across climate gradients and quantifying associations. We used machine learning to model each species as a function of environmental variables, including host landscape. We also evaluated future temperatures across altitudes under climate change scenarios.</div></div><div><h3><em>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</em></h3><div>Among ten algorithms evaluated, random forests and support vector machines generally performed best for predicting severity or infestation. Host landscape variables were useful predictors for some species. Based on climate matching, 44 % of the pathogens and pests could become more common with warmer temperatures at higher altitudes, while 17 % may become less common.</div></div><div><h3><em>SIGNIFICANCE</em></h3><div>These findings indicate how crop health in the region requires adaptation to multiple sustainability challenges. The results also indicate which pathogen and pest species have the potential for development of decision support models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104619"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A biogenic life cycle approach towards estimating the carbon intensity of wool production: Evidence from six Australian case studies 估算羊毛生产碳强度的生物生命周期方法:来自六个澳大利亚案例研究的证据
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104631
James Blignaut , Paul Swan , Lemuel Blignaut

Context

Life cycle assessments (LCA) of wool typically associate this natural textile fibre with a high greenhouse gas emissions intensity because of enteric emissions. We analysed the application of 14 LCAs published between 2010 and 2024 and found that they focussed exclusively on emissions, disregarding the fact that wool production is embedded in a biogenic system. ISO 14067:2018 recognises biogenic carbon but has not been applied to wool yet. Here we seek to rectify this.

Objective

This study explores the application of ISO 14067:2018 to six representative Australian wool enterprises, extending the detailed LCA case study data from Wiedemann et al. (2016) to define and map the flows of biogenic carbon ingested by grazing sheep. Thereafter we explore the impact of key aspects of system biogenic function on calculated wool emissions intensity within the sheep production system.

Results and Conclusions

Mapping of ingested carbon flows across enterprises showed that the major carbon destinations were manure (54.1 %), followed by respiration (22.7 %), urine (7.5 %), and enteric emissions (5.2 %). Exploration of the emissions intensity of wool production showed that while biogenic model outputs closely correlated with those of Wiedemann et al. (2016) when biogenic carbon was excluded, emissions intensities were reduced by the addition of biogenic functionality, declining by on average 102 % with retention of 66.7 % of manure within the grazing system. We conclude that conducting LCA of biological products without addressing biogenic carbon inflates the emission intensity.

Significance

For the first time, the on-farm cradle-to-farm gate flow of biogenic carbon of Australian greasy wool production are comprehensively analysed in a manner that conforms with ISO 14067:2018; it has a major impact on wool's carbon footprint.
羊毛的生命周期评估(LCA)通常将这种天然纺织纤维与高温室气体排放强度联系在一起,因为它会产生肠道排放。我们分析了2010年至2024年间发表的14份lca的应用,发现它们只关注排放,而忽视了羊毛生产嵌入生物系统的事实。ISO 14067:2018承认生物碳,但尚未应用于羊毛。在这里,我们试图纠正这一点。本研究探讨了ISO 14067:2018在6家具有代表性的澳大利亚羊毛企业中的应用,扩展了Wiedemann et al.(2016)详细的LCA案例研究数据,以定义和绘制放牧羊摄入的生物源碳流。此后,我们探讨了系统生物功能的关键方面对绵羊生产系统中计算羊毛排放强度的影响。结果与结论对各企业的碳排放流量进行了分析,结果表明,企业碳排放的主要目的地是粪便(54.1%),其次是呼吸(22.7%)、尿液(7.5%)和肠道排放(5.2%)。对羊毛生产排放强度的探索表明,虽然在排除生物源碳的情况下,生物源模型的输出与Wiedemann等人(2016)的输出密切相关,但通过添加生物源功能,排放强度降低了,平均下降了102%,在放牧系统中保留了66.7%的粪便。我们的结论是,在不解决生物源性碳的情况下进行生物制品的LCA会增加排放强度。意义:首次以符合ISO 14067:2018的方式全面分析了澳大利亚油腻羊毛生产的农场从摇篮到农场大门的生物碳流;它对羊毛的碳足迹有重大影响。
{"title":"A biogenic life cycle approach towards estimating the carbon intensity of wool production: Evidence from six Australian case studies","authors":"James Blignaut ,&nbsp;Paul Swan ,&nbsp;Lemuel Blignaut","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104631","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104631","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Life cycle assessments (LCA) of wool typically associate this natural textile fibre with a high greenhouse gas emissions intensity because of enteric emissions. We analysed the application of 14 LCAs published between 2010 and 2024 and found that they focussed exclusively on emissions, disregarding the fact that wool production is embedded in a biogenic system. ISO 14067:2018 recognises biogenic carbon but has not been applied to wool yet. Here we seek to rectify this.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explores the application of ISO 14067:2018 to six representative Australian wool enterprises, extending the detailed LCA case study data from <span><span>Wiedemann et al. (2016)</span></span> to define and map the flows of biogenic carbon ingested by grazing sheep. Thereafter we explore the impact of key aspects of system biogenic function on calculated wool emissions intensity within the sheep production system.</div></div><div><h3>Results and Conclusions</h3><div>Mapping of ingested carbon flows across enterprises showed that the major carbon destinations were manure (54.1 %), followed by respiration (22.7 %), urine (7.5 %), and enteric emissions (5.2 %). Exploration of the emissions intensity of wool production showed that while biogenic model outputs closely correlated with those of <span><span>Wiedemann et al. (2016)</span></span> when biogenic carbon was excluded, emissions intensities were reduced by the addition of biogenic functionality, declining by on average 102 % with retention of 66.7 % of manure within the grazing system. We conclude that conducting LCA of biological products without addressing biogenic carbon inflates the emission intensity.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>For the first time, the on-farm cradle-to-farm gate flow of biogenic carbon of Australian greasy wool production are comprehensively analysed in a manner that conforms with ISO 14067:2018; it has a major impact on wool's carbon footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104631"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing climate risk and adaptive strategies for forage production in Brazilian pasture-based livestock under future climate scenarios 评估未来气候情景下巴西放牧牲畜饲料生产的气候风险和适应性策略
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104615
H.B. Brunetti , I.M. Fattori Junior , T.S.S. Dias , M.L.A. de Melo , P.M. Santos , J.R.M. Pezzopane , K.J. Boote , F.R. Marin

CONTEXT

Brazil hosts the world's largest commercial cattle herd, primarily raised in pasture-based systems that occupy around 164 million ha. Increasing beef production while minimizing environmental impacts is essential. Although climate change is expected to significantly affect global crop yields, comprehensive assessments of its impacts on forage production in Brazil remain scarce.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate (i) the effects of climate change on forage yield, seasonality, and climate risk for Marandu palisadegrass (Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Marandu) and Mombaça guineagrass (Megathyrsus maximus cv. BRS Mombaça) by 2050, and (ii) the effectiveness of pasture deferment and forage ensiling as mitigation strategies.

METHODS

We used the process-based CROPGRO-Perennial Forage Model (CROPGRO-PFM) driven by 10 Global Circulation Models under SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 scenarios for the 2035–2065 period, compared to a baseline (1989–2019). For the deferment simulation, pastures were left ungrazed for 75 days preceding the three consecutive months with the lowest herbage accumulation rates (HAR), assuming that 50 % of the accumulated dead material remained available for intake. Ensiling was simulated for 90 days during the three months with the highest HARs, assuming 75 % dry matter recovery, which was subsequently allocated to the three months with the lowest HAR. Both management practices were applied to 30 % of the pasture area.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate a slight decline in annual forage yield, increased drought stress during winter and spring, and intensified seasonality. Climate risk, however, is projected to decrease as the magnitude and period of drought stress and forage deficits and supply will be more predictable, facilitating feed planning. Deferment (Marandu) and ensiling (Mombaça) were effective in reducing seasonality. Ensiling also reversed projected yield declines, whereas deferment improved yield, though not enough to reverse declines. Projected drought stress may require renewed focus on drought-tolerant cultivars and strategic use of rainy-season surpluses to buffer dry-season deficits.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides the first robust, multi-model, process-based evaluation of climate change impacts on Brazilian forage systems, offering valuable guidance for breeders, policymakers, and producers aiming to enhance the resilience and sustainability of pasture-based livestock systems under future climate conditions.
巴西拥有世界上最大的商业牛群,主要饲养在牧场系统中,占地约1.64亿公顷。增加牛肉产量的同时尽量减少对环境的影响是至关重要的。尽管气候变化预计将显著影响全球作物产量,但对其对巴西饲料生产影响的全面评估仍然很少。目的评价气候变化对马兰度牧草产量、季节性和气候风险的影响。马兰杜(BRS Marandu)和大黄草(Megathyrsus maximus cv.)。(二)作为缓解战略的牧草延期和青贮饲料的有效性。方法采用基于过程的cropgro -多年生牧草模型(CROPGRO-PFM),该模型由10个全球环流模型驱动,在SSP2-4.5和SSP5-8.5情景下,与基线(1989-2019)进行比较。在延迟模拟中,在牧草积累率(HAR)最低的连续3个月之前,假设有50%的累积死料可供采食,在75天内不放牧。在HAR最高的3个月模拟青贮90天,假设干物质回收率为75%,然后分配给HAR最低的3个月。这两种管理方法应用于30%的牧场面积。结果与结论青壮年牧草产量略有下降,冬春季干旱胁迫加剧,季节性加剧。然而,气候风险预计将减少,因为干旱胁迫的程度和时间以及饲料短缺和供应将更加可预测,从而促进饲料规划。延期(Marandu)和青贮(mombaa)在减少季节性方面是有效的。青贮也扭转了预期的产量下降,而延期则提高了产量,尽管不足以扭转产量下降。预计的干旱压力可能需要重新关注耐旱品种,并战略性地利用雨季盈余来缓冲旱季赤字。本研究首次对气候变化对巴西牧草系统的影响进行了稳健的、多模型的、基于过程的评估,为育种者、政策制定者和生产者提供了有价值的指导,旨在提高放牧牲畜系统在未来气候条件下的恢复力和可持续性。
{"title":"Assessing climate risk and adaptive strategies for forage production in Brazilian pasture-based livestock under future climate scenarios","authors":"H.B. Brunetti ,&nbsp;I.M. Fattori Junior ,&nbsp;T.S.S. Dias ,&nbsp;M.L.A. de Melo ,&nbsp;P.M. Santos ,&nbsp;J.R.M. Pezzopane ,&nbsp;K.J. Boote ,&nbsp;F.R. Marin","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104615","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104615","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Brazil hosts the world's largest commercial cattle herd, primarily raised in pasture-based systems that occupy around 164 million ha. Increasing beef production while minimizing environmental impacts is essential. Although climate change is expected to significantly affect global crop yields, comprehensive assessments of its impacts on forage production in Brazil remain scarce.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>Evaluate (i) the effects of climate change on forage yield, seasonality, and climate risk for Marandu palisadegrass (<em>Urochloa brizantha</em> cv. BRS Marandu) and Mombaça guineagrass (<em>Megathyrsus maximus</em> cv. BRS Mombaça) by 2050, and (ii) the effectiveness of pasture deferment and forage ensiling as mitigation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We used the process-based CROPGRO-Perennial Forage Model (CROPGRO-PFM) driven by 10 Global Circulation Models under SSP2–4.5 and SSP5–8.5 scenarios for the 2035–2065 period, compared to a baseline (1989–2019). For the deferment simulation, pastures were left ungrazed for 75 days preceding the three consecutive months with the lowest herbage accumulation rates (HAR), assuming that 50 % of the accumulated dead material remained available for intake. Ensiling was simulated for 90 days during the three months with the highest HARs, assuming 75 % dry matter recovery, which was subsequently allocated to the three months with the lowest HAR. Both management practices were applied to 30 % of the pasture area.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Results indicate a slight decline in annual forage yield, increased drought stress during winter and spring, and intensified seasonality. Climate risk, however, is projected to decrease as the magnitude and period of drought stress and forage deficits and supply will be more predictable, facilitating feed planning. Deferment (Marandu) and ensiling (Mombaça) were effective in reducing seasonality. Ensiling also reversed projected yield declines, whereas deferment improved yield, though not enough to reverse declines. Projected drought stress may require renewed focus on drought-tolerant cultivars and strategic use of rainy-season surpluses to buffer dry-season deficits.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study provides the first robust, multi-model, process-based evaluation of climate change impacts on Brazilian forage systems, offering valuable guidance for breeders, policymakers, and producers aiming to enhance the resilience and sustainability of pasture-based livestock systems under future climate conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 104615"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145836967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Agricultural Systems
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1