Pub Date : 2025-11-19DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104566
Mina Devkota , Krishna Prasad Devkota , Mohie El Din Omar , Samar Attaher , Ajit Govind , Vinay Nangia
CONTEXT
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is Egypt's staple crop, crucial for national food security. However, the country remains heavily reliant on imports to meet domestic demand. Enhancing production sustainably requires a systematic assessment of attainable yield and profit gaps along with the identification of key factors driving.
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to identify major determinants of wheat yield and profit gaps across different governorates in New and Old Lands; to develop context-specific integrated agronomic solutions for sustainably closing these gaps while reducing environmental footprints.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We used random field survey samples of 2042 individual wheat fields across 23 wheat-growing governorates covering New and Old Lands during 2021/2022 growing season. Based on crop yield, farmers were categorized into three groups, and attainable yield and profit gaps were calculated from difference between mean yield of top 10th decile and average farmers' yield. Random Forest model is used to analyze data and identify major factors affecting yield, profit, and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Sustainability of wheat production was assessed using various indicators. Comparative analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in yield, input use efficiency, and profitability between Old and New Land, as well as across different yield gap categories.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analysis revealed significant yield and profit gaps between average and high-yielding farmers in both Old and New Lands. In Old Land, high-yield farmers (10th decile) achieved average yields of 8.4 t ha−1 and net profits of US$1097 ha−1, compared with 6.5 t ha−1 and US$675 ha−1 for medium-yield farmers. In the New Lands, the yield gap was more pronounced, with high-yield farmers achieving average yields of 7.5 t ha−1 compared to 4.63 t ha−1 for medium-yield farmers, highlighting a significant opportunity to increase productivity. Determinants for yield and profit varied across governorates, indicating need for governorate-specific strategies to sustainably close yield and profit gaps. Water productivity, NUE, and labor productivity were notably lower, while production cost showed no strong correlation with yield and was negatively correlated with greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI). Raised bed planting improved NUE by 29 %, increased water productivity by 18 %, and reduced GHGI by 15 % compared with conventional flat planting.
SIGNIFICANCE
Adopting context-specific agronomic practices that combine integrated-fertilization, efficient irrigation, suitable varieties, and raised-bed planting can enhance agronomic gains while reducing environmental footprints. When tailored to local yield-limiting factors, these solutions provide a sustainable pathway to narrow
小麦(Triticum aestivum)是埃及的主要作物,对国家粮食安全至关重要。然而,该国仍然严重依赖进口来满足国内需求。可持续地提高生产需要系统地评估可实现的产量和利润差距,并确定关键驱动因素。本研究旨在确定新旧土地不同省份小麦产量和利润差距的主要决定因素;制定针对具体情况的综合农艺解决方案,以可持续地缩小这些差距,同时减少环境足迹。材料与方法在2021/2022年小麦生长季,我们对23个小麦种植省份的2042块单独的麦田进行了随机调查。根据作物产量将农户分为三类,通过前十分之一农户平均产量与农户平均产量之差计算可得产量和利润差距。采用随机森林模型对数据进行分析,找出影响产量、利润和氮素利用效率的主要因素。利用各种指标对小麦生产的可持续性进行了评价。通过比较分析,评价了新旧土地之间以及不同产量缺口类别之间在产量、投入物利用效率和盈利能力方面的差异。结果与讨论分析表明,在新旧土地上,平均产量和高产农民之间存在显著的产量和利润差距。在Old Land,高产农民(10十分之一)的平均产量为8.4 t hm2,净利润为1097 hm2,而中等产量农民的平均产量为6.5 t hm2,净利润为675 hm2。在新地,产量差距更为明显,高产农民的平均产量为7.5吨/公顷,而中等产量农民的平均产量为4.63吨/公顷,这表明提高生产力的机会很大。产量和利润的决定因素因省而异,这表明需要针对省的具体战略来持续缩小产量和利润差距。水分生产力、氮肥利用效率和劳动生产率显著降低,生产成本与产量的相关性不强,与温室气体排放强度呈负相关。与传统平面种植相比,垄作床种植提高了29%的氮肥利用效率,提高了18%的水分生产力,并减少了15%的温室气体排放。采用结合综合施肥、高效灌溉、适宜品种和高床种植的因地制宜的农艺措施可以提高农业效益,同时减少环境足迹。当针对当地的产量限制因素进行定制时,这些解决方案提供了一条缩小产量和利润差距的可持续途径。在有利的政策和有效的推广系统的支持下,扩大数据驱动的解决方案为加强埃及和类似干旱灌溉地区的小麦自给提供了可行的选择。
{"title":"Context-specific agronomic solutions for achieving agronomic gains with reduced environmental footprints in irrigated drylands of Egypt","authors":"Mina Devkota , Krishna Prasad Devkota , Mohie El Din Omar , Samar Attaher , Ajit Govind , Vinay Nangia","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104566","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104566","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em>) is Egypt's staple crop, crucial for national food security. However, the country remains heavily reliant on imports to meet domestic demand. Enhancing production sustainably requires a systematic assessment of attainable yield and profit gaps along with the identification of key factors driving.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><div>This study aims to identify major determinants of wheat yield and profit gaps across different governorates in New and Old Lands; to develop context-specific integrated agronomic solutions for sustainably closing these gaps while reducing environmental footprints.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>We used random field survey samples of 2042 individual wheat fields across 23 wheat-growing governorates covering New and Old Lands during 2021/2022 growing season. Based on crop yield, farmers were categorized into three groups, and attainable yield and profit gaps were calculated from difference between mean yield of top 10th decile and average farmers' yield. Random Forest model is used to analyze data and identify major factors affecting yield, profit, and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Sustainability of wheat production was assessed using various indicators. Comparative analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in yield, input use efficiency, and profitability between Old and New Land, as well as across different yield gap categories.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</h3><div>Analysis revealed significant yield and profit gaps between average and high-yielding farmers in both Old and New Lands. In Old Land, high-yield farmers (10th decile) achieved average yields of 8.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and net profits of US$1097 ha<sup>−1</sup>, compared with 6.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and US$675 ha<sup>−1</sup> for medium-yield farmers. In the New Lands, the yield gap was more pronounced, with high-yield farmers achieving average yields of 7.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to 4.63 t ha<sup>−1</sup> for medium-yield farmers, highlighting a significant opportunity to increase productivity. Determinants for yield and profit varied across governorates, indicating need for governorate-specific strategies to sustainably close yield and profit gaps. Water productivity, NUE, and labor productivity were notably lower, while production cost showed no strong correlation with yield and was negatively correlated with greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI). Raised bed planting improved NUE by 29 %, increased water productivity by 18 %, and reduced GHGI by 15 % compared with conventional flat planting.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Adopting context-specific agronomic practices that combine integrated-fertilization, efficient irrigation, suitable varieties, and raised-bed planting can enhance agronomic gains while reducing environmental footprints. When tailored to local yield-limiting factors, these solutions provide a sustainable pathway to narrow","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 104566"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104561
Ralph J.M. Temmink , Kristiina Lång , Renske J.E. Vroom , Jens Leifeld , Christian Fritz , Walther Zeug , Daniela Thrän , Clemens Kleinspehn , Greta Gaudig , Josephine Neubert , Jürgen Kreyling , Jennifer M. Rhymes , Chris D. Evans , Wiktor Kotowski , Anke Nordt , Franziska Tanneberger
CONTEXT
Humanity must overcome the polycrisis of biodiversity loss, climate change and pollution. These challenges are especially urgent in peatlands, which develop slowly under waterlogged conditions, function as landscape filters and store large amounts of carbon. Drainage for agriculture, forestry or peat extraction leads to severe socio-ecological impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, land subsidence, higher flood and drought risks and downstream pollution.
OBJECTIVE
This study evaluates paludiculture as an innovative wet agricultural land use that maintains wet peatlands, offers economic alternatives to drainage-based systems and reduces environmental impacts.
METHODS
We reviewed and synthesized ecological and socio-economic evidence from low- and high intensity paludiculture practices to assess their potential to balance human needs with peatland conservation.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Paludiculture is a promising new agricultural land use that effectively reduces greenhouse gas emissions, supports biodiversity restoration and contributes to climate mitigation and sustainable development. Our findings show direct and indirect contributions to ten UN Sustainable Development Goals: no poverty, good health, clean water, clean energy, innovation, sustainable cities and communities, responsible production, climate action, life below water, and life on land. Nonetheless, challenges remain regarding economic viability, land-use competition and management.
SIGNIFICANCE
Paludiculture shows how wetland agriculture can create new revenue opportunities combined with ecological protection. By contributing to both climate and biodiversity goals, it is a sustainable alternative to drainage-based peatland use.
{"title":"Agriculture on wet peatlands: the sustainability potential of paludiculture","authors":"Ralph J.M. Temmink , Kristiina Lång , Renske J.E. Vroom , Jens Leifeld , Christian Fritz , Walther Zeug , Daniela Thrän , Clemens Kleinspehn , Greta Gaudig , Josephine Neubert , Jürgen Kreyling , Jennifer M. Rhymes , Chris D. Evans , Wiktor Kotowski , Anke Nordt , Franziska Tanneberger","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104561","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Humanity must overcome the polycrisis of biodiversity loss, climate change and pollution. These challenges are especially urgent in peatlands, which develop slowly under waterlogged conditions, function as landscape filters and store large amounts of carbon. Drainage for agriculture, forestry or peat extraction leads to severe socio-ecological impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, land subsidence, higher flood and drought risks and downstream pollution.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study evaluates paludiculture as an innovative wet agricultural land use that maintains wet peatlands, offers economic alternatives to drainage-based systems and reduces environmental impacts.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We reviewed and synthesized ecological and socio-economic evidence from low- and high intensity paludiculture practices to assess their potential to balance human needs with peatland conservation.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Paludiculture is a promising new agricultural land use that effectively reduces greenhouse gas emissions, supports biodiversity restoration and contributes to climate mitigation and sustainable development. Our findings show direct and indirect contributions to ten UN Sustainable Development Goals: no poverty, good health, clean water, clean energy, innovation, sustainable cities and communities, responsible production, climate action, life below water, and life on land. Nonetheless, challenges remain regarding economic viability, land-use competition and management.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Paludiculture shows how wetland agriculture can create new revenue opportunities combined with ecological protection. By contributing to both climate and biodiversity goals, it is a sustainable alternative to drainage-based peatland use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104561"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-17DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104570
Belay Tizazu Mengistie, Ram L. Ray
Climate smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly promoted as a solution to climate related threats to global food systems. While research on CSA is growing, critical analysis of its evolution, implementation, and future pathways remains limited, especially across diverse geopolitical contexts. Critics argue that several farming practices, interventions, and technologies are being introduced as climate-smart, even though they may not effectively address the issues caused by climate change. This review systematically examines 129 publications to assess challenges, recent advancements, and future directions in CSA practices and technologies. The findings reveal significant barriers to adoption, including policy gaps and technological limitations. This review identified several critical challenges and potential future pathways in the current structure of CSA adoption which includes fragmented definitions, practice vs. policy gap, insufficient integration of socio-economic dimensions; weak monitoring and accountability mechanisms; overreliance on quantitative metrics and fragmented indicator systems among others. CSA has advanced globally through diverse practices and technologies, yet faces political contestation, goal trade-offs, and power imbalances. Its adoption depends on personal, technological, economic, institutional, socio-cultural, and informational factors CSA is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It highlights concerns over CSA being lacking unified criteria, and unevenly addressing its three core pillars. Overall, this review analyzed that CSA implementation often reflects power imbalances, as policies, funding, and technologies are largely shaped by institutions in the Global North, frequently misaligned with the needs and realities of smallholder farmers in the Global South. Effective CSA requires context-specific solutions that optimize synergies and manage the trade-off between core pillars of CSA. The review calls for context specific interventions and broader engagement beyond scientific framing to make CSA more inclusive and effective for farmers, policymakers, and stakeholders globally.
{"title":"Global dynamics of climate smart agricultural practices and technologies: Recent advancements, challenges and potential future pathways - A review","authors":"Belay Tizazu Mengistie, Ram L. Ray","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104570","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104570","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly promoted as a solution to climate related threats to global food systems. While research on CSA is growing, critical analysis of its evolution, implementation, and future pathways remains limited, especially across diverse geopolitical contexts. Critics argue that several farming practices, interventions, and technologies are being introduced as climate-smart, even though they may not effectively address the issues caused by climate change. This review systematically examines 129 publications to assess challenges, recent advancements, and future directions in CSA practices and technologies. The findings reveal significant barriers to adoption, including policy gaps and technological limitations. This review identified several critical challenges and potential future pathways in the current structure of CSA adoption which includes fragmented definitions, practice vs. policy gap, insufficient integration of socio-economic dimensions; weak monitoring and accountability mechanisms; overreliance on quantitative metrics and fragmented indicator systems among others. CSA has advanced globally through diverse practices and technologies, yet faces political contestation, goal trade-offs, and power imbalances. Its adoption depends on personal, technological, economic, institutional, socio-cultural, and informational factors CSA is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It highlights concerns over CSA being lacking unified criteria, and unevenly addressing its three core pillars. Overall, this review analyzed that CSA implementation often reflects power imbalances, as policies, funding, and technologies are largely shaped by institutions in the Global North, frequently misaligned with the needs and realities of smallholder farmers in the Global South. Effective CSA requires context-specific solutions that optimize synergies and manage the trade-off between core pillars of CSA. The review calls for context specific interventions and broader engagement beyond scientific framing to make CSA more inclusive and effective for farmers, policymakers, and stakeholders globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104570"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104553
Elizabeth Heagney , Daniel Gregg , Dan Hill , James Radford , Grace Sutton , Fred Rainsford , Daniel O'Brien , Angela Hawdon , Imogen Semmler , Mark Gardner , Milly Taylor , Sue Ogilvy
CONTEXT
Ambitious targets under the Paris Climate Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework bring increasing urgency for agriculture to play an active role as a nature-based solution to climate and biodiversity loss. But widespread uptake of nature-based solutions by the agriculture sector has proved elusive. This paper presents the results of the Farming for the Future Livestock Program, a large-scale program that sought to quantify the financial implications of natural capital for farm business performance in Australia's broadacre livestock sector, which covers 350 million ha and contributes more than 50% of the country's gross value of agricultural production.
OBJECTIVE
We aim to build a better understanding of the financial implications of natural capital on farms - a critical knowledge gap that limits effective policy and landholder adoption of nature-based solutions in the agriculture sector. We aim to quantify the effect of on-farm natural capital on farm business performance.
METHODS
We collected natural capital data from 114 farms via satellite imagery analysis and on-ground vegetation surveys, alongside production and financial data collected via detailed producer surveys. We used five natural capital metrics (Ecological Condition, Aggregation, Proximity, Ground Cover, and Forage Condition) to understand the effect of natural capital on farm business performance (productivity efficiency, profitability and financial resilience) on farms with a combined land area of >230,000 ha, in the largest analysis of its kind to date.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Our multi-region models tested a total of 20 natural capital – farm business performance relationships (4 business performance measures x 5 natural capital metrics). There was moderate or strong evidence for 6 of these (5 positive, one negative) and weak statistical evidence for a further 6 relationships (4 positive, 2 negative). Region-specific models yielded similar results to the multi-region model. This suggests that high-performing livestock businesses benefit from high levels of natural capital. High levels of specific types of natural capital were associated with increased production efficiency of up to 3%, improved livestock gross margin, higher farm earnings, and higher levels of climate resilience.
SIGNIFICANCE
We highlight the important role that integrating robust information about the financial implications of natural capital in production systems can play in shaping appropriate and adoptable nature-based climate solutions for the agriculture sector.
{"title":"Natural capital enhances farm production, profitability and financial resilience: findings from a study on 230,000 ha of farmland in Australia","authors":"Elizabeth Heagney , Daniel Gregg , Dan Hill , James Radford , Grace Sutton , Fred Rainsford , Daniel O'Brien , Angela Hawdon , Imogen Semmler , Mark Gardner , Milly Taylor , Sue Ogilvy","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Ambitious targets under the Paris Climate Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework bring increasing urgency for agriculture to play an active role as a nature-based solution to climate and biodiversity loss. But widespread uptake of nature-based solutions by the agriculture sector has proved elusive. This paper presents the results of the <em>Farming for the Future Livestock Program</em>, a large-scale program that sought to quantify the financial implications of natural capital for farm business performance in Australia's broadacre livestock sector, which covers 350 million ha and contributes more than 50% of the country's gross value of agricultural production.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>We aim to build a better understanding of the financial implications of natural capital on farms - a critical knowledge gap that limits effective policy and landholder adoption of nature-based solutions in the agriculture sector. We aim to quantify the effect of on-farm natural capital on farm business performance.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We collected natural capital data from 114 farms via satellite imagery analysis and on-ground vegetation surveys, alongside production and financial data collected via detailed producer surveys. We used five natural capital metrics (<em>Ecological Condition</em>, <em>Aggregation</em>, <em>Proximity</em>, <em>Ground Cover</em>, and <em>Forage Condition</em>) to understand the effect of natural capital on farm business performance (productivity efficiency, profitability and financial resilience) on farms with a combined land area of >230,000 ha, in the largest analysis of its kind to date.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Our multi-region models tested a total of 20 natural capital – farm business performance relationships (4 business performance measures x 5 natural capital metrics). There was moderate or strong evidence for 6 of these (5 positive, one negative) and weak statistical evidence for a further 6 relationships (4 positive, 2 negative). Region-specific models yielded similar results to the multi-region model. This suggests that high-performing livestock businesses benefit from high levels of natural capital. High levels of specific types of natural capital were associated with increased production efficiency of up to 3%, improved livestock gross margin, higher farm earnings, and higher levels of climate resilience.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>We highlight the important role that integrating robust information about the financial implications of natural capital in production systems can play in shaping appropriate and adoptable nature-based climate solutions for the agriculture sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104553"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104563
Kenny Paul , Stefan Schweng , Hans-Peter Kaul , Franz Gansberger , Andreas Holzinger
<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Agricultural productivity faces growing challenges due to climate variability, resource constraints, and the demand for sustainable practices. Precision agriculture, powered by artificial intelligence (AI) integrate high-throughput phenotyping, offers practical advancements for monitoring crop traits, growth patterns, and responses to environmental factors. The Pheno-Farm Server (PFS) leverages AI-driven approaches to integrate real-time data, analyse it, and enable adaptive decision making for efficient crop management in diverse farming environments such as glasshouses, rain-out shelters (ROS), experimental farms, and open fields. This empowers stakeholders to make informed, data-driven decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates the potential of the PFS in advancing precision agriculture through adaptive AI models. It focuses on the system's ability to collect, process, and analyse data by developing a robust pipeline for integrating phenotyping datasets and optimizing nitrogen application. Additionally, it assesses the effectiveness of AI/ML-based adaptive decision-making in improving crop management and resource utilization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The PFS was implemented using a structured framework integrating hardware, software, and data processing components. Data from phenotyping platforms, including plant area (PA) measurements and digital biomass (DBM) estimates from four cereal cultivars under varying nitrogen levels (NL) and drought conditions (DC), were aggregated into the PFS. Three regression models such as Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest were trained and evaluated using a structured pre-processing pipeline. Hyperparameters were optimized through grid search with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE). Tests were conducted to validate the system's reliability and applicability.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>The experimental implementation of the PFS demonstrated its capability to collect and analyse data from various sources effectively. The SVR model had the highest accuracy with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.992 and an NRMSE significantly lower than other models followed by Random Forest and Ridge Regression. SVR was good at understanding complex relationships and worked well with unseen nitrogen levels. Random Forest showed limitations in generalization due to data dependency. The integration of AI-powered servers like PFS improve precision agriculture by making real-time data analysis possible, allowing smart decisions, and using resources more efficiently.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The integration of AI-powered systems like PFS represents a significant advancement in sustainable farming. These systems help drive innovation and tackle important agricultural problems, leading to
由于气候变化、资源限制和对可持续做法的需求,农业生产力面临越来越大的挑战。以人工智能(AI)为动力的精准农业整合了高通量表型,为监测作物性状、生长模式和对环境因素的反应提供了实际的进步。Pheno-Farm Server (PFS)利用人工智能驱动的方法整合实时数据,对其进行分析,并实现自适应决策,以便在不同的农业环境(如温室、雨棚(ROS)、实验农场和开放田地)中进行有效的作物管理。这使利益相关者能够做出明智的、数据驱动的决策。目的通过自适应人工智能模型评估PFS在推进精准农业方面的潜力。它侧重于系统的收集、处理和分析数据的能力,通过开发一个强大的管道来整合表型数据集和优化氮的应用。此外,它还评估了基于人工智能/机器学习的适应性决策在改善作物管理和资源利用方面的有效性。方法采用集成硬件、软件和数据处理组件的结构化框架实现PFS。来自表型平台的数据,包括4个谷物品种在不同氮水平(NL)和干旱条件(DC)下的植物面积(PA)测量和数字生物量(DBM)估计,被汇总到PFS中。采用结构化预处理管道对岭回归、支持向量回归和随机森林三种回归模型进行了训练和评估。通过网格搜索优化超参数,并进行5次交叉验证。采用决定系数(R2)和归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)评估模型性能。通过试验验证了系统的可靠性和适用性。结果与结论PFS的实验实现证明了它能够有效地收集和分析来自各种来源的数据。SVR模型精度最高,R2为0.992,NRMSE显著低于随机森林和Ridge回归后的其他模型。SVR擅长理解复杂的关系,并且在看不见的氮水平下工作得很好。由于数据依赖性,随机森林在泛化方面存在局限性。PFS等人工智能服务器的集成使实时数据分析成为可能,允许做出明智的决策,并更有效地利用资源,从而改善了精准农业。像PFS这样的人工智能系统的集成代表了可持续农业的重大进步。这些系统有助于推动创新和解决重要的农业问题,从而实现高产、盈利和环境友好型农业。这项研究展示了人工智能如何改变传统农业,并为数据驱动的农业实践设定新的标准。
{"title":"AI-powered Pheno-Farm Server: Making adaptive farming decisions","authors":"Kenny Paul , Stefan Schweng , Hans-Peter Kaul , Franz Gansberger , Andreas Holzinger","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104563","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104563","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Agricultural productivity faces growing challenges due to climate variability, resource constraints, and the demand for sustainable practices. Precision agriculture, powered by artificial intelligence (AI) integrate high-throughput phenotyping, offers practical advancements for monitoring crop traits, growth patterns, and responses to environmental factors. The Pheno-Farm Server (PFS) leverages AI-driven approaches to integrate real-time data, analyse it, and enable adaptive decision making for efficient crop management in diverse farming environments such as glasshouses, rain-out shelters (ROS), experimental farms, and open fields. This empowers stakeholders to make informed, data-driven decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates the potential of the PFS in advancing precision agriculture through adaptive AI models. It focuses on the system's ability to collect, process, and analyse data by developing a robust pipeline for integrating phenotyping datasets and optimizing nitrogen application. Additionally, it assesses the effectiveness of AI/ML-based adaptive decision-making in improving crop management and resource utilization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The PFS was implemented using a structured framework integrating hardware, software, and data processing components. Data from phenotyping platforms, including plant area (PA) measurements and digital biomass (DBM) estimates from four cereal cultivars under varying nitrogen levels (NL) and drought conditions (DC), were aggregated into the PFS. Three regression models such as Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest were trained and evaluated using a structured pre-processing pipeline. Hyperparameters were optimized through grid search with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE). Tests were conducted to validate the system's reliability and applicability.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>The experimental implementation of the PFS demonstrated its capability to collect and analyse data from various sources effectively. The SVR model had the highest accuracy with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.992 and an NRMSE significantly lower than other models followed by Random Forest and Ridge Regression. SVR was good at understanding complex relationships and worked well with unseen nitrogen levels. Random Forest showed limitations in generalization due to data dependency. The integration of AI-powered servers like PFS improve precision agriculture by making real-time data analysis possible, allowing smart decisions, and using resources more efficiently.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The integration of AI-powered systems like PFS represents a significant advancement in sustainable farming. These systems help drive innovation and tackle important agricultural problems, leading to","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104563"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Grain Producers in export-oriented grain systems face mounting pressure to coordinate harvest logistics under growing climatic, institutional, and infrastructure constraints. These stresses are especially acute in regions with decentralised production, long transport routes, and limited receival and labour capacity. In such settings, logistics adaptability is not just an operational concern but a critical factor shaping farmers' access to markets and overall system performance.
Objective
This study investigates how Western Australian (WA) grain farmers adapt their storage, freight, and delivery strategies in response to misalignments between on-farm decision-making and centralised grain logistics infrastructure.
Methods
Using an abductive, mixed-methods approach—including 48 surveys, 19 interviews, and media and policy document analysis—we explored how farm-level decisions interact with institutional asymmetries and inflexible infrastructure. The design is theoretically informed by Actor–Network Theory to trace translations, enrolment and obligatory passage points among heterogeneous human/non-human actors, and by the Actors–Resources–Activities framework to map actor bonds, resource ties and activity links across inland logistics.
Results and conclusions
The findings reveal that growers rely on on-farm storage, investment in mobile freight capacity, and tactical scheduling to manage seasonal bottlenecks and limited delivery access. These strategies are shaped by market signals, spatial disparities in receival infrastructure and transport options and behavioural heuristics that help farmers navigate institutional constraints. While such adaptations provide short-term resilience, they also create inefficiencies and reinforce systemic inequities in harvest throughput, export timing, and access to price premiums.
Significance
This study contributes to ongoing debates on agricultural systems resilience by linking farm-level behavioural adaptation with infrastructure governance and logistics system design. It highlights the need for modelling frameworks—such as agent-based or participatory approaches—that reflect decentralised, spatially differentiated decision-making. Implications are drawn for transport planning, cooperative infrastructure policy, and the development of future decision-support systems tailored to export-reliant agricultural regions.
{"title":"Farm-level adaptations to harvest logistics constraints in export-oriented grain systems","authors":"Garima , Doina Olaru , Brett Smith , Kadambot H.M. Siddique","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104565","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104565","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Grain Producers in export-oriented grain systems face mounting pressure to coordinate harvest logistics under growing climatic, institutional, and infrastructure constraints. These stresses are especially acute in regions with decentralised production, long transport routes, and limited receival and labour capacity. In such settings, logistics adaptability is not just an operational concern but a critical factor shaping farmers' access to markets and overall system performance.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates how Western Australian (WA) grain farmers adapt their storage, freight, and delivery strategies in response to misalignments between on-farm decision-making and centralised grain logistics infrastructure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an abductive, mixed-methods approach—including 48 surveys, 19 interviews, and media and policy document analysis—we explored how farm-level decisions interact with institutional asymmetries and inflexible infrastructure. The design is theoretically informed by Actor–Network Theory to trace translations, enrolment and obligatory passage points among heterogeneous human/non-human actors, and by the Actors–Resources–Activities framework to map actor bonds, resource ties and activity links across inland logistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>The findings reveal that growers rely on on-farm storage, investment in mobile freight capacity, and tactical scheduling to manage seasonal bottlenecks and limited delivery access. These strategies are shaped by market signals, spatial disparities in receival infrastructure and transport options and behavioural heuristics that help farmers navigate institutional constraints. While such adaptations provide short-term resilience, they also create inefficiencies and reinforce systemic inequities in harvest throughput, export timing, and access to price premiums.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This study contributes to ongoing debates on agricultural systems resilience by linking farm-level behavioural adaptation with infrastructure governance and logistics system design. It highlights the need for modelling frameworks—such as agent-based or participatory approaches—that reflect decentralised, spatially differentiated decision-making. Implications are drawn for transport planning, cooperative infrastructure policy, and the development of future decision-support systems tailored to export-reliant agricultural regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104565"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104564
B. Brown , P. Timsina , A. Chaudhary , E. Karki , A. Sharma , K.K. Das , A. Ghosh , M.W. Rahman
CONTEXT
Agri-mechanisation continues to be a policy and development priority across the Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia. However, adoption evaluations are often constrained by methodological limitations, including narrow sampling, restricted analytical scope, and an overreliance on binary adoption metrics. These shortcomings hinder a deeper understanding of the dynamics and quality of mechanisation adoption in the region.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to improve the assessment of agri-mechanisation adoption by introducing and applying a comprehensive analytical framework (‘Five Ps of Adoption Analysis’) to move beyond binary metrics and uncover the underlying patterns, processes, and pathways of mechanisation uptake.
METHODS
The ‘Five Ps’ framework was applied to survey data on the use of eight key agricultural machines collected from 5053 households across 55 villages in Nepal, India, and Bangladesh. The framework integrates proportional, temporal, typological, pathway, and process-based analyses to enable a multidimensional evaluation of adoption.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The analysis reveals critical insights into regional mechanisation trends, including significant constraints in extension systems, sub-optimal adoption rates, and the presence of pseudo-adoption. Temporal and typological analyses expose the uneven evolution of adoption processes across contexts and machine types. The framework offers a novel means to capture the diversity and progression of adoption over time, providing a richer understanding than traditional binary approaches.
SIGNIFICANCE
This study advances methodological approaches in mechanisation research and offers practical insights for policymakers and development practitioners. By identifying key barriers and dynamic adoption patterns, the findings support more targeted interventions and highlight the need for complementary qualitative research to inform sustainable agri-mechanisation strategies in South Asia.
{"title":"There is more to it than just adoption: Exploring agricultural mechanisation journeys in South Asia","authors":"B. Brown , P. Timsina , A. Chaudhary , E. Karki , A. Sharma , K.K. Das , A. Ghosh , M.W. Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agri-mechanisation continues to be a policy and development priority across the Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia. However, adoption evaluations are often constrained by methodological limitations, including narrow sampling, restricted analytical scope, and an overreliance on binary adoption metrics. These shortcomings hinder a deeper understanding of the dynamics and quality of mechanisation adoption in the region.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to improve the assessment of agri-mechanisation adoption by introducing and applying a comprehensive analytical framework (‘Five Ps of Adoption Analysis’) to move beyond binary metrics and uncover the underlying patterns, processes, and pathways of mechanisation uptake.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The ‘Five Ps’ framework was applied to survey data on the use of eight key agricultural machines collected from 5053 households across 55 villages in Nepal, India, and Bangladesh. The framework integrates proportional, temporal, typological, pathway, and process-based analyses to enable a multidimensional evaluation of adoption.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The analysis reveals critical insights into regional mechanisation trends, including significant constraints in extension systems, sub-optimal adoption rates, and the presence of pseudo-adoption. Temporal and typological analyses expose the uneven evolution of adoption processes across contexts and machine types. The framework offers a novel means to capture the diversity and progression of adoption over time, providing a richer understanding than traditional binary approaches.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study advances methodological approaches in mechanisation research and offers practical insights for policymakers and development practitioners. By identifying key barriers and dynamic adoption patterns, the findings support more targeted interventions and highlight the need for complementary qualitative research to inform sustainable agri-mechanisation strategies in South Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104564"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104542
Lucas A. Fadda , Rodrigo Lasa-Covarrubias , Luis Osorio-Olvera , M. Gabriela Murúa , Andrés Lira-Noriega
CONTEXT
Declining global agricultural productivity driven by climate variability and pest proliferation creates unprecedented food security challenges that traditional management approaches cannot adequately address. Ecological Niche Models (ENM) and Species Distribution Models (SDM) have emerged as powerful frameworks for predicting spatial distributions under future climate scenarios. These approaches enable identification of optimal cultivation zones and development of targeted adaptation strategies that enhance resilience across agricultural systems while supporting proactive management for global food security.
OBJECTIVE
This review explores the development and use of ENM and SDM in agriculture, livestock, and forestry, emphasizing their role in identifying production areas, assessing risks from pests, diseases, and weeds, and informing management decisions. It also addresses key methodological aspects and their growing importance in sanitary planning, food security, and climate adaptation.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature review to examine ENM and SDM applications in productive systems. The analysis recorded specific uses, target organisms, study objectives, and key elements of model construction, parameterization, validation, transferability, and input data.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The review defined the current scope of ENM and SDM in productive systems and identified critical knowledge gaps. It highlights the value of the BAM framework to guide modeling design and interpretation. The findings provide a conceptual base for broader applications and identify future research and implementation opportunities.
SIGNIFICANCE
ENM and SDM transform complex ecological and production data into actionable insights that support policy, social, economic, and management decisions across agriculture, forestry, and livestock sectors. Their flexibility across scales enables tailored solutions. Technological advances will enhance their impact, positioning these models as essential tools for sustainable food security.
{"title":"Applications of ecological niche and species distribution models in agricultural, livestock, and forestry systems: A comprehensive review","authors":"Lucas A. Fadda , Rodrigo Lasa-Covarrubias , Luis Osorio-Olvera , M. Gabriela Murúa , Andrés Lira-Noriega","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104542","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104542","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Declining global agricultural productivity driven by climate variability and pest proliferation creates unprecedented food security challenges that traditional management approaches cannot adequately address. Ecological Niche Models (ENM) and Species Distribution Models (SDM) have emerged as powerful frameworks for predicting spatial distributions under future climate scenarios. These approaches enable identification of optimal cultivation zones and development of targeted adaptation strategies that enhance resilience across agricultural systems while supporting proactive management for global food security.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This review explores the development and use of ENM and SDM in agriculture, livestock, and forestry, emphasizing their role in identifying production areas, assessing risks from pests, diseases, and weeds, and informing management decisions. It also addresses key methodological aspects and their growing importance in sanitary planning, food security, and climate adaptation.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted a systematic literature review to examine ENM and SDM applications in productive systems. The analysis recorded specific uses, target organisms, study objectives, and key elements of model construction, parameterization, validation, transferability, and input data.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The review defined the current scope of ENM and SDM in productive systems and identified critical knowledge gaps. It highlights the value of the BAM framework to guide modeling design and interpretation. The findings provide a conceptual base for broader applications and identify future research and implementation opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>ENM and SDM transform complex ecological and production data into actionable insights that support policy, social, economic, and management decisions across agriculture, forestry, and livestock sectors. Their flexibility across scales enables tailored solutions. Technological advances will enhance their impact, positioning these models as essential tools for sustainable food security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104542"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104555
Hiroyuki Takeshima , Avinash Kishore
<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>In non-experimental settings, evidence of interannual cumulative effects of inputs for annual crops (e.g., the effects of inputs in one year on outputs in the subsequent year) remains limited despite potential implications within dynamic production systems. The scarcity of sufficiently long annual panel data partly explains this. Furthermore, in non-experimental settings, quantities of many inputs are highly correlated with one another and across years, posing challenges when isolating such cumulative effects through conventional estimation methods.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study narrows these knowledge gaps by applying novel methods to unique annual panel datasets at district- and farm household-levels in India. Specifically, we identify whether certain inputs exhibit meaningfully significant cumulative effects on production relative to the non-cumulative effects and the effects of other inputs.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We start with flexible translog production functions appropriate for identifying cumulative effects in non-experimental settings. We apply shrinkage methods (LASSO and GMM-LASSO) to approximate production functions with reduced parameter dimensions, addressing multicollinearity among multiple inputs as well as among the same inputs across years, and potential endogeneity in inputs.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Throughout the shrinkage process, potassium fertilizer consistently remains a key predictor of outputs, while other inputs (land, labor, capital, irrigation, and other fertilizer nutrients) drop out mainly due to high collinearity with potassium and other inputs. More importantly, the cumulative quantity of potassium from the previous year, as well as the current year, is a consistently more critical determinant of production than the quantity of potassium from the current year alone, demonstrating the significant cumulative effects of potassium. These patterns hold both at district and farm levels across diverse agroecologies and cropping systems. Furthermore, the dynamic panel data analyses further suggest that farmers' use of potassium in the current year is significantly negatively affected by its use in the previous year, potentially stabilizing outputs across years. Earlier agronomic results suggesting residual effects of potassium are potentially relevant across wider geographic regions than previously thought. Simulation exercises reveal that the cumulative effects of potassium translate into a significant carryover of productivity into the following year and, combined with the dynamics, considerable repercussions on production during the subsequent years</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to verify the interannual cumulative effects of potassium fertilizer in nonexperimental settings, using methods that control for all other relevant production inputs and their potential cumulative effects with
{"title":"Estimating cumulative input effects in annual crop production: A LASSO-based panel data approach from India","authors":"Hiroyuki Takeshima , Avinash Kishore","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104555","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>In non-experimental settings, evidence of interannual cumulative effects of inputs for annual crops (e.g., the effects of inputs in one year on outputs in the subsequent year) remains limited despite potential implications within dynamic production systems. The scarcity of sufficiently long annual panel data partly explains this. Furthermore, in non-experimental settings, quantities of many inputs are highly correlated with one another and across years, posing challenges when isolating such cumulative effects through conventional estimation methods.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study narrows these knowledge gaps by applying novel methods to unique annual panel datasets at district- and farm household-levels in India. Specifically, we identify whether certain inputs exhibit meaningfully significant cumulative effects on production relative to the non-cumulative effects and the effects of other inputs.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We start with flexible translog production functions appropriate for identifying cumulative effects in non-experimental settings. We apply shrinkage methods (LASSO and GMM-LASSO) to approximate production functions with reduced parameter dimensions, addressing multicollinearity among multiple inputs as well as among the same inputs across years, and potential endogeneity in inputs.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Throughout the shrinkage process, potassium fertilizer consistently remains a key predictor of outputs, while other inputs (land, labor, capital, irrigation, and other fertilizer nutrients) drop out mainly due to high collinearity with potassium and other inputs. More importantly, the cumulative quantity of potassium from the previous year, as well as the current year, is a consistently more critical determinant of production than the quantity of potassium from the current year alone, demonstrating the significant cumulative effects of potassium. These patterns hold both at district and farm levels across diverse agroecologies and cropping systems. Furthermore, the dynamic panel data analyses further suggest that farmers' use of potassium in the current year is significantly negatively affected by its use in the previous year, potentially stabilizing outputs across years. Earlier agronomic results suggesting residual effects of potassium are potentially relevant across wider geographic regions than previously thought. Simulation exercises reveal that the cumulative effects of potassium translate into a significant carryover of productivity into the following year and, combined with the dynamics, considerable repercussions on production during the subsequent years</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to verify the interannual cumulative effects of potassium fertilizer in nonexperimental settings, using methods that control for all other relevant production inputs and their potential cumulative effects with","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104555"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-09DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104552
Beibei Guo , Xian Zou , Yingxue Cui , Suchen Ying , Yinkang Zhou
Context
The food-energy-water (FEW) nexus is crucial for addressing global resource conflicts and sustainability challenges. It achieves this by securing resources, enhancing synergies, managing competition, and supporting climate adaptation. In the context of China, there is an urgent need to balance FEW securities with carbon neutrality in its food system, particularly given the complex environmental and socioeconomic pressures it faces.
Objective
This study aims to analyze correlations within the food-energy-water‑carbon (FEWC) nexus, characterize its resources, identify spatial allocation patterns and synergistic relationships, determine obstacles to agricultural sustainability, land planning, and cultivated land protection within the nexus, and propose tailored protection strategies for the basin.
Methods
Utilizing multi-source remote sensing data, FEWC resource potentials were characterized (integrated food production, power plant/renewable energy potential, total regional water production, carbon storage). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the Yangtze River basin data to study the FEWC nexus, using representative indicators providing a robust scientific characterization.
Results and conclusions
PCA showed the first principal component indicates FEWC synergies (reflecting overall synergy intensity), while the second reveals FEWC trade-offs. FEWC nexus evolution enhanced overall synergy but displayed an inverted U-shape pattern in terrestrial ecosystems, marked by growing energy dominance and a shift of food status. Consequently, food security's strategic importance decreased amid rising energy consumption, persistent water scarcity, and increasing carbon neutrality demands. Future conflicts concentrate in cultivated land areas. Spatial zoning requires prioritizing farmland protection and developing energy-agriculture linkages. Monitoring should track food production polarization and conflict zone changes, with FEWC synergy projected to rise in more than 70 % of cities. Carbon storage dynamics must also be monitored, while agricultural buffer zones are needed to reduce ecological risks.
Significance
The study provides valuable insights applicable to territorial spatial planning efforts at the basin scale. Furthermore, it offers tools with which to analyze complex resource nexuses and strategies for sustainable agricultural land management on a global scale.
{"title":"Spatial planning based on the modeling the food-energy-water‑carbon nexus: A case study of the Yangtze River basin","authors":"Beibei Guo , Xian Zou , Yingxue Cui , Suchen Ying , Yinkang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104552","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The food-energy-water (FEW) nexus is crucial for addressing global resource conflicts and sustainability challenges. It achieves this by securing resources, enhancing synergies, managing competition, and supporting climate adaptation. In the context of China, there is an urgent need to balance FEW securities with carbon neutrality in its food system, particularly given the complex environmental and socioeconomic pressures it faces.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to analyze correlations within the food-energy-water‑carbon (FEWC) nexus, characterize its resources, identify spatial allocation patterns and synergistic relationships, determine obstacles to agricultural sustainability, land planning, and cultivated land protection within the nexus, and propose tailored protection strategies for the basin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Utilizing multi-source remote sensing data, FEWC resource potentials were characterized (integrated food production, power plant/renewable energy potential, total regional water production, carbon storage). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the Yangtze River basin data to study the FEWC nexus, using representative indicators providing a robust scientific characterization.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>PCA showed the first principal component indicates FEWC synergies (reflecting overall synergy intensity), while the second reveals FEWC trade-offs. FEWC nexus evolution enhanced overall synergy but displayed an inverted U-shape pattern in terrestrial ecosystems, marked by growing energy dominance and a shift of food status. Consequently, food security's strategic importance decreased amid rising energy consumption, persistent water scarcity, and increasing carbon neutrality demands. Future conflicts concentrate in cultivated land areas. Spatial zoning requires prioritizing farmland protection and developing energy-agriculture linkages. Monitoring should track food production polarization and conflict zone changes, with FEWC synergy projected to rise in more than 70 % of cities. Carbon storage dynamics must also be monitored, while agricultural buffer zones are needed to reduce ecological risks.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The study provides valuable insights applicable to territorial spatial planning efforts at the basin scale. Furthermore, it offers tools with which to analyze complex resource nexuses and strategies for sustainable agricultural land management on a global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104552"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145473191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}