首页 > 最新文献

Agricultural Systems最新文献

英文 中文
Context-specific agronomic solutions for achieving agronomic gains with reduced environmental footprints in irrigated drylands of Egypt 在埃及灌溉旱地减少环境足迹的情况下实现农业效益的具体农艺解决方案
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104566
Mina Devkota , Krishna Prasad Devkota , Mohie El Din Omar , Samar Attaher , Ajit Govind , Vinay Nangia

CONTEXT

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is Egypt's staple crop, crucial for national food security. However, the country remains heavily reliant on imports to meet domestic demand. Enhancing production sustainably requires a systematic assessment of attainable yield and profit gaps along with the identification of key factors driving.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify major determinants of wheat yield and profit gaps across different governorates in New and Old Lands; to develop context-specific integrated agronomic solutions for sustainably closing these gaps while reducing environmental footprints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used random field survey samples of 2042 individual wheat fields across 23 wheat-growing governorates covering New and Old Lands during 2021/2022 growing season. Based on crop yield, farmers were categorized into three groups, and attainable yield and profit gaps were calculated from difference between mean yield of top 10th decile and average farmers' yield. Random Forest model is used to analyze data and identify major factors affecting yield, profit, and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Sustainability of wheat production was assessed using various indicators. Comparative analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in yield, input use efficiency, and profitability between Old and New Land, as well as across different yield gap categories.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Analysis revealed significant yield and profit gaps between average and high-yielding farmers in both Old and New Lands. In Old Land, high-yield farmers (10th decile) achieved average yields of 8.4 t ha−1 and net profits of US$1097 ha−1, compared with 6.5 t ha−1 and US$675 ha−1 for medium-yield farmers. In the New Lands, the yield gap was more pronounced, with high-yield farmers achieving average yields of 7.5 t ha−1 compared to 4.63 t ha−1 for medium-yield farmers, highlighting a significant opportunity to increase productivity. Determinants for yield and profit varied across governorates, indicating need for governorate-specific strategies to sustainably close yield and profit gaps. Water productivity, NUE, and labor productivity were notably lower, while production cost showed no strong correlation with yield and was negatively correlated with greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI). Raised bed planting improved NUE by 29 %, increased water productivity by 18 %, and reduced GHGI by 15 % compared with conventional flat planting.

SIGNIFICANCE

Adopting context-specific agronomic practices that combine integrated-fertilization, efficient irrigation, suitable varieties, and raised-bed planting can enhance agronomic gains while reducing environmental footprints. When tailored to local yield-limiting factors, these solutions provide a sustainable pathway to narrow
小麦(Triticum aestivum)是埃及的主要作物,对国家粮食安全至关重要。然而,该国仍然严重依赖进口来满足国内需求。可持续地提高生产需要系统地评估可实现的产量和利润差距,并确定关键驱动因素。本研究旨在确定新旧土地不同省份小麦产量和利润差距的主要决定因素;制定针对具体情况的综合农艺解决方案,以可持续地缩小这些差距,同时减少环境足迹。材料与方法在2021/2022年小麦生长季,我们对23个小麦种植省份的2042块单独的麦田进行了随机调查。根据作物产量将农户分为三类,通过前十分之一农户平均产量与农户平均产量之差计算可得产量和利润差距。采用随机森林模型对数据进行分析,找出影响产量、利润和氮素利用效率的主要因素。利用各种指标对小麦生产的可持续性进行了评价。通过比较分析,评价了新旧土地之间以及不同产量缺口类别之间在产量、投入物利用效率和盈利能力方面的差异。结果与讨论分析表明,在新旧土地上,平均产量和高产农民之间存在显著的产量和利润差距。在Old Land,高产农民(10十分之一)的平均产量为8.4 t hm2,净利润为1097 hm2,而中等产量农民的平均产量为6.5 t hm2,净利润为675 hm2。在新地,产量差距更为明显,高产农民的平均产量为7.5吨/公顷,而中等产量农民的平均产量为4.63吨/公顷,这表明提高生产力的机会很大。产量和利润的决定因素因省而异,这表明需要针对省的具体战略来持续缩小产量和利润差距。水分生产力、氮肥利用效率和劳动生产率显著降低,生产成本与产量的相关性不强,与温室气体排放强度呈负相关。与传统平面种植相比,垄作床种植提高了29%的氮肥利用效率,提高了18%的水分生产力,并减少了15%的温室气体排放。采用结合综合施肥、高效灌溉、适宜品种和高床种植的因地制宜的农艺措施可以提高农业效益,同时减少环境足迹。当针对当地的产量限制因素进行定制时,这些解决方案提供了一条缩小产量和利润差距的可持续途径。在有利的政策和有效的推广系统的支持下,扩大数据驱动的解决方案为加强埃及和类似干旱灌溉地区的小麦自给提供了可行的选择。
{"title":"Context-specific agronomic solutions for achieving agronomic gains with reduced environmental footprints in irrigated drylands of Egypt","authors":"Mina Devkota ,&nbsp;Krishna Prasad Devkota ,&nbsp;Mohie El Din Omar ,&nbsp;Samar Attaher ,&nbsp;Ajit Govind ,&nbsp;Vinay Nangia","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104566","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104566","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Wheat (<em>Triticum aestivum</em>) is Egypt's staple crop, crucial for national food security. However, the country remains heavily reliant on imports to meet domestic demand. Enhancing production sustainably requires a systematic assessment of attainable yield and profit gaps along with the identification of key factors driving.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><div>This study aims to identify major determinants of wheat yield and profit gaps across different governorates in New and Old Lands; to develop context-specific integrated agronomic solutions for sustainably closing these gaps while reducing environmental footprints.</div></div><div><h3>MATERIALS AND METHODS</h3><div>We used random field survey samples of 2042 individual wheat fields across 23 wheat-growing governorates covering New and Old Lands during 2021/2022 growing season. Based on crop yield, farmers were categorized into three groups, and attainable yield and profit gaps were calculated from difference between mean yield of top 10th decile and average farmers' yield. Random Forest model is used to analyze data and identify major factors affecting yield, profit, and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Sustainability of wheat production was assessed using various indicators. Comparative analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in yield, input use efficiency, and profitability between Old and New Land, as well as across different yield gap categories.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</h3><div>Analysis revealed significant yield and profit gaps between average and high-yielding farmers in both Old and New Lands. In Old Land, high-yield farmers (10th decile) achieved average yields of 8.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and net profits of US$1097 ha<sup>−1</sup>, compared with 6.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> and US$675 ha<sup>−1</sup> for medium-yield farmers. In the New Lands, the yield gap was more pronounced, with high-yield farmers achieving average yields of 7.5 t ha<sup>−1</sup> compared to 4.63 t ha<sup>−1</sup> for medium-yield farmers, highlighting a significant opportunity to increase productivity. Determinants for yield and profit varied across governorates, indicating need for governorate-specific strategies to sustainably close yield and profit gaps. Water productivity, NUE, and labor productivity were notably lower, while production cost showed no strong correlation with yield and was negatively correlated with greenhouse gas emission intensity (GHGI). Raised bed planting improved NUE by 29 %, increased water productivity by 18 %, and reduced GHGI by 15 % compared with conventional flat planting.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Adopting context-specific agronomic practices that combine integrated-fertilization, efficient irrigation, suitable varieties, and raised-bed planting can enhance agronomic gains while reducing environmental footprints. When tailored to local yield-limiting factors, these solutions provide a sustainable pathway to narrow","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"232 ","pages":"Article 104566"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145578178","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agriculture on wet peatlands: the sustainability potential of paludiculture 湿泥炭地的农业:古农业的可持续性潜力
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104561
Ralph J.M. Temmink , Kristiina Lång , Renske J.E. Vroom , Jens Leifeld , Christian Fritz , Walther Zeug , Daniela Thrän , Clemens Kleinspehn , Greta Gaudig , Josephine Neubert , Jürgen Kreyling , Jennifer M. Rhymes , Chris D. Evans , Wiktor Kotowski , Anke Nordt , Franziska Tanneberger

CONTEXT

Humanity must overcome the polycrisis of biodiversity loss, climate change and pollution. These challenges are especially urgent in peatlands, which develop slowly under waterlogged conditions, function as landscape filters and store large amounts of carbon. Drainage for agriculture, forestry or peat extraction leads to severe socio-ecological impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, land subsidence, higher flood and drought risks and downstream pollution.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates paludiculture as an innovative wet agricultural land use that maintains wet peatlands, offers economic alternatives to drainage-based systems and reduces environmental impacts.

METHODS

We reviewed and synthesized ecological and socio-economic evidence from low- and high intensity paludiculture practices to assess their potential to balance human needs with peatland conservation.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Paludiculture is a promising new agricultural land use that effectively reduces greenhouse gas emissions, supports biodiversity restoration and contributes to climate mitigation and sustainable development. Our findings show direct and indirect contributions to ten UN Sustainable Development Goals: no poverty, good health, clean water, clean energy, innovation, sustainable cities and communities, responsible production, climate action, life below water, and life on land. Nonetheless, challenges remain regarding economic viability, land-use competition and management.

SIGNIFICANCE

Paludiculture shows how wetland agriculture can create new revenue opportunities combined with ecological protection. By contributing to both climate and biodiversity goals, it is a sustainable alternative to drainage-based peatland use.
人类必须克服生物多样性丧失、气候变化和污染等多重危机。这些挑战在泥炭地尤其紧迫,泥炭地在淹水条件下发展缓慢,具有景观过滤器的功能,并储存大量碳。用于农业、林业或泥炭开采的排水会造成严重的社会生态影响,包括温室气体排放、生物多样性丧失、地面沉降、洪涝和干旱风险增加以及下游污染。目的:本研究评估了湿地农业作为一种创新的湿润农业用地利用方式,它可以保持湿润的泥炭地,为排水系统提供经济替代方案,并减少对环境的影响。方法回顾并综合了低强度和高强度泥炭地的生态和社会经济证据,以评估它们在平衡人类需求和保护泥炭地方面的潜力。结果与结论水产养殖是一种有发展前景的新型农业用地方式,可有效减少温室气体排放,支持生物多样性恢复,有助于减缓气候变化和可持续发展。我们的研究结果显示了对十项联合国可持续发展目标的直接和间接贡献:无贫困、良好健康、清洁水、清洁能源、创新、可持续城市和社区、负责任的生产、气候行动、水下生命和陆地生命。尽管如此,在经济可行性、土地使用竞争和管理方面仍然存在挑战。意义:湿地农业展示了湿地农业如何结合生态保护创造新的收入机会。通过促进气候和生物多样性目标,它是基于排水的泥炭地利用的可持续替代方案。
{"title":"Agriculture on wet peatlands: the sustainability potential of paludiculture","authors":"Ralph J.M. Temmink ,&nbsp;Kristiina Lång ,&nbsp;Renske J.E. Vroom ,&nbsp;Jens Leifeld ,&nbsp;Christian Fritz ,&nbsp;Walther Zeug ,&nbsp;Daniela Thrän ,&nbsp;Clemens Kleinspehn ,&nbsp;Greta Gaudig ,&nbsp;Josephine Neubert ,&nbsp;Jürgen Kreyling ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Rhymes ,&nbsp;Chris D. Evans ,&nbsp;Wiktor Kotowski ,&nbsp;Anke Nordt ,&nbsp;Franziska Tanneberger","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104561","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Humanity must overcome the polycrisis of biodiversity loss, climate change and pollution. These challenges are especially urgent in peatlands, which develop slowly under waterlogged conditions, function as landscape filters and store large amounts of carbon. Drainage for agriculture, forestry or peat extraction leads to severe socio-ecological impacts, including greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, land subsidence, higher flood and drought risks and downstream pollution.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study evaluates paludiculture as an innovative wet agricultural land use that maintains wet peatlands, offers economic alternatives to drainage-based systems and reduces environmental impacts.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We reviewed and synthesized ecological and socio-economic evidence from low- and high intensity paludiculture practices to assess their potential to balance human needs with peatland conservation.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Paludiculture is a promising new agricultural land use that effectively reduces greenhouse gas emissions, supports biodiversity restoration and contributes to climate mitigation and sustainable development. Our findings show direct and indirect contributions to ten UN Sustainable Development Goals: no poverty, good health, clean water, clean energy, innovation, sustainable cities and communities, responsible production, climate action, life below water, and life on land. Nonetheless, challenges remain regarding economic viability, land-use competition and management.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>Paludiculture shows how wetland agriculture can create new revenue opportunities combined with ecological protection. By contributing to both climate and biodiversity goals, it is a sustainable alternative to drainage-based peatland use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104561"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global dynamics of climate smart agricultural practices and technologies: Recent advancements, challenges and potential future pathways - A review 气候智能型农业实践和技术的全球动态:最新进展、挑战和潜在的未来途径综述
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104570
Belay Tizazu Mengistie, Ram L. Ray
Climate smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly promoted as a solution to climate related threats to global food systems. While research on CSA is growing, critical analysis of its evolution, implementation, and future pathways remains limited, especially across diverse geopolitical contexts. Critics argue that several farming practices, interventions, and technologies are being introduced as climate-smart, even though they may not effectively address the issues caused by climate change. This review systematically examines 129 publications to assess challenges, recent advancements, and future directions in CSA practices and technologies. The findings reveal significant barriers to adoption, including policy gaps and technological limitations. This review identified several critical challenges and potential future pathways in the current structure of CSA adoption which includes fragmented definitions, practice vs. policy gap, insufficient integration of socio-economic dimensions; weak monitoring and accountability mechanisms; overreliance on quantitative metrics and fragmented indicator systems among others. CSA has advanced globally through diverse practices and technologies, yet faces political contestation, goal trade-offs, and power imbalances. Its adoption depends on personal, technological, economic, institutional, socio-cultural, and informational factors CSA is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It highlights concerns over CSA being lacking unified criteria, and unevenly addressing its three core pillars. Overall, this review analyzed that CSA implementation often reflects power imbalances, as policies, funding, and technologies are largely shaped by institutions in the Global North, frequently misaligned with the needs and realities of smallholder farmers in the Global South. Effective CSA requires context-specific solutions that optimize synergies and manage the trade-off between core pillars of CSA. The review calls for context specific interventions and broader engagement beyond scientific framing to make CSA more inclusive and effective for farmers, policymakers, and stakeholders globally.
气候智慧型农业(CSA)作为应对全球粮食系统面临的气候相关威胁的一种解决方案,正日益得到推广。虽然对CSA的研究正在增长,但对其演变、实施和未来路径的批判性分析仍然有限,特别是在不同的地缘政治背景下。批评人士认为,一些农业实践、干预措施和技术正在被作为气候智能型技术引入,尽管它们可能无法有效解决气候变化引起的问题。本综述系统地审查了129份出版物,以评估CSA实践和技术的挑战、最新进展和未来方向。调查结果揭示了采用的重大障碍,包括政策差距和技术限制。本次审查确定了当前采用CSA结构中的几个关键挑战和潜在的未来途径,包括定义碎片化、实践与政策差距、社会经济层面整合不足;监测和问责机制薄弱;过度依赖定量指标和支离破碎的指标体系等。CSA通过各种实践和技术在全球范围内取得了进步,但也面临着政治竞争、目标权衡和权力不平衡。它的采用取决于个人、技术、经济、制度、社会文化和信息等因素,CSA不是一个放之四海而皆准的解决方案。它强调了对CSA缺乏统一标准的担忧,并且不均衡地解决其三个核心支柱。总体而言,本综述分析了CSA的实施往往反映了权力失衡,因为政策、资金和技术在很大程度上是由全球北方的机构决定的,经常与全球南方小农的需求和现实脱节。有效的CSA需要针对具体情况的解决方案,以优化协同作用并管理CSA核心支柱之间的权衡。该评估呼吁采取针对具体情况的干预措施,并在科学框架之外进行更广泛的参与,以使CSA对全球农民、政策制定者和利益相关者更具包容性和有效性。
{"title":"Global dynamics of climate smart agricultural practices and technologies: Recent advancements, challenges and potential future pathways - A review","authors":"Belay Tizazu Mengistie,&nbsp;Ram L. Ray","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104570","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104570","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly promoted as a solution to climate related threats to global food systems. While research on CSA is growing, critical analysis of its evolution, implementation, and future pathways remains limited, especially across diverse geopolitical contexts. Critics argue that several farming practices, interventions, and technologies are being introduced as climate-smart, even though they may not effectively address the issues caused by climate change. This review systematically examines 129 publications to assess challenges, recent advancements, and future directions in CSA practices and technologies. The findings reveal significant barriers to adoption, including policy gaps and technological limitations. This review identified several critical challenges and potential future pathways in the current structure of CSA adoption which includes fragmented definitions, practice vs. policy gap, insufficient integration of socio-economic dimensions; weak monitoring and accountability mechanisms; overreliance on quantitative metrics and fragmented indicator systems among others. CSA has advanced globally through diverse practices and technologies, yet faces political contestation, goal trade-offs, and power imbalances. Its adoption depends on personal, technological, economic, institutional, socio-cultural, and informational factors CSA is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It highlights concerns over CSA being lacking unified criteria, and unevenly addressing its three core pillars. Overall, this review analyzed that CSA implementation often reflects power imbalances, as policies, funding, and technologies are largely shaped by institutions in the Global North, frequently misaligned with the needs and realities of smallholder farmers in the Global South. Effective CSA requires context-specific solutions that optimize synergies and manage the trade-off between core pillars of CSA. The review calls for context specific interventions and broader engagement beyond scientific framing to make CSA more inclusive and effective for farmers, policymakers, and stakeholders globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104570"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145568697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Natural capital enhances farm production, profitability and financial resilience: findings from a study on 230,000 ha of farmland in Australia 自然资本提高了农业生产、盈利能力和财务弹性:一项对澳大利亚23万公顷农田的研究发现
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104553
Elizabeth Heagney , Daniel Gregg , Dan Hill , James Radford , Grace Sutton , Fred Rainsford , Daniel O'Brien , Angela Hawdon , Imogen Semmler , Mark Gardner , Milly Taylor , Sue Ogilvy

CONTEXT

Ambitious targets under the Paris Climate Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework bring increasing urgency for agriculture to play an active role as a nature-based solution to climate and biodiversity loss. But widespread uptake of nature-based solutions by the agriculture sector has proved elusive. This paper presents the results of the Farming for the Future Livestock Program, a large-scale program that sought to quantify the financial implications of natural capital for farm business performance in Australia's broadacre livestock sector, which covers 350 million ha and contributes more than 50% of the country's gross value of agricultural production.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to build a better understanding of the financial implications of natural capital on farms - a critical knowledge gap that limits effective policy and landholder adoption of nature-based solutions in the agriculture sector. We aim to quantify the effect of on-farm natural capital on farm business performance.

METHODS

We collected natural capital data from 114 farms via satellite imagery analysis and on-ground vegetation surveys, alongside production and financial data collected via detailed producer surveys. We used five natural capital metrics (Ecological Condition, Aggregation, Proximity, Ground Cover, and Forage Condition) to understand the effect of natural capital on farm business performance (productivity efficiency, profitability and financial resilience) on farms with a combined land area of >230,000 ha, in the largest analysis of its kind to date.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Our multi-region models tested a total of 20 natural capital – farm business performance relationships (4 business performance measures x 5 natural capital metrics). There was moderate or strong evidence for 6 of these (5 positive, one negative) and weak statistical evidence for a further 6 relationships (4 positive, 2 negative). Region-specific models yielded similar results to the multi-region model. This suggests that high-performing livestock businesses benefit from high levels of natural capital. High levels of specific types of natural capital were associated with increased production efficiency of up to 3%, improved livestock gross margin, higher farm earnings, and higher levels of climate resilience.

SIGNIFICANCE

We highlight the important role that integrating robust information about the financial implications of natural capital in production systems can play in shaping appropriate and adoptable nature-based climate solutions for the agriculture sector.
《巴黎气候协定》和《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》雄心勃勃的目标使得农业日益迫切需要发挥积极作用,以自然为基础解决气候和生物多样性丧失问题。但事实证明,农业部门难以广泛采用基于自然的解决方案。本文介绍了“未来畜牧业农业计划”的结果,这是一个大型计划,旨在量化自然资本对澳大利亚广阔畜牧业农场经营绩效的财务影响,该畜牧业占地3.5亿公顷,占该国农业生产总值的50%以上。我们的目标是更好地了解自然资本对农场的财务影响,这是一个关键的知识缺口,限制了农业部门有效的政策和土地所有者采用基于自然的解决方案。我们的目标是量化农场自然资本对农场经营绩效的影响。我们通过卫星图像分析和地面植被调查收集了114个农场的自然资本数据,并通过详细的生产者调查收集了生产和财务数据。我们使用了五个自然资本指标(生态条件、聚集性、邻近性、土地覆盖和饲料条件)来了解自然资本对农场经营绩效(生产力效率、盈利能力和财务弹性)的影响,这些农场的总面积为23万公顷,这是迄今为止同类分析中规模最大的一次。结果与结论我们的多区域模型共检验了20个自然资本与农场经营绩效的关系(4个经营绩效指标x 5个自然资本指标)。其中6个有中等或强烈的证据(5个正相关,1个负相关),另外6个有弱的统计证据(4个正相关,2个负相关)。特定区域模型得出的结果与多区域模型相似。这表明,高绩效的畜牧业企业受益于高水平的自然资本。特定类型自然资本的高水平与生产效率提高高达3%、牲畜毛利率提高、农业收入增加和气候适应能力提高有关。我们强调,整合有关自然资本在生产系统中的财务影响的可靠信息,可以在为农业部门制定适当和可采用的基于自然的气候解决方案方面发挥重要作用。
{"title":"Natural capital enhances farm production, profitability and financial resilience: findings from a study on 230,000 ha of farmland in Australia","authors":"Elizabeth Heagney ,&nbsp;Daniel Gregg ,&nbsp;Dan Hill ,&nbsp;James Radford ,&nbsp;Grace Sutton ,&nbsp;Fred Rainsford ,&nbsp;Daniel O'Brien ,&nbsp;Angela Hawdon ,&nbsp;Imogen Semmler ,&nbsp;Mark Gardner ,&nbsp;Milly Taylor ,&nbsp;Sue Ogilvy","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Ambitious targets under the Paris Climate Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework bring increasing urgency for agriculture to play an active role as a nature-based solution to climate and biodiversity loss. But widespread uptake of nature-based solutions by the agriculture sector has proved elusive. This paper presents the results of the <em>Farming for the Future Livestock Program</em>, a large-scale program that sought to quantify the financial implications of natural capital for farm business performance in Australia's broadacre livestock sector, which covers 350 million ha and contributes more than 50% of the country's gross value of agricultural production.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>We aim to build a better understanding of the financial implications of natural capital on farms - a critical knowledge gap that limits effective policy and landholder adoption of nature-based solutions in the agriculture sector. We aim to quantify the effect of on-farm natural capital on farm business performance.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We collected natural capital data from 114 farms via satellite imagery analysis and on-ground vegetation surveys, alongside production and financial data collected via detailed producer surveys. We used five natural capital metrics (<em>Ecological Condition</em>, <em>Aggregation</em>, <em>Proximity</em>, <em>Ground Cover</em>, and <em>Forage Condition</em>) to understand the effect of natural capital on farm business performance (productivity efficiency, profitability and financial resilience) on farms with a combined land area of &gt;230,000 ha, in the largest analysis of its kind to date.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Our multi-region models tested a total of 20 natural capital – farm business performance relationships (4 business performance measures x 5 natural capital metrics). There was moderate or strong evidence for 6 of these (5 positive, one negative) and weak statistical evidence for a further 6 relationships (4 positive, 2 negative). Region-specific models yielded similar results to the multi-region model. This suggests that high-performing livestock businesses benefit from high levels of natural capital. High levels of specific types of natural capital were associated with increased production efficiency of up to 3%, improved livestock gross margin, higher farm earnings, and higher levels of climate resilience.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>We highlight the important role that integrating robust information about the financial implications of natural capital in production systems can play in shaping appropriate and adoptable nature-based climate solutions for the agriculture sector.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104553"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AI-powered Pheno-Farm Server: Making adaptive farming decisions 人工智能驱动的Pheno-Farm服务器:做出适应性农场决策
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104563
Kenny Paul , Stefan Schweng , Hans-Peter Kaul , Franz Gansberger , Andreas Holzinger
<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Agricultural productivity faces growing challenges due to climate variability, resource constraints, and the demand for sustainable practices. Precision agriculture, powered by artificial intelligence (AI) integrate high-throughput phenotyping, offers practical advancements for monitoring crop traits, growth patterns, and responses to environmental factors. The Pheno-Farm Server (PFS) leverages AI-driven approaches to integrate real-time data, analyse it, and enable adaptive decision making for efficient crop management in diverse farming environments such as glasshouses, rain-out shelters (ROS), experimental farms, and open fields. This empowers stakeholders to make informed, data-driven decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study evaluates the potential of the PFS in advancing precision agriculture through adaptive AI models. It focuses on the system's ability to collect, process, and analyse data by developing a robust pipeline for integrating phenotyping datasets and optimizing nitrogen application. Additionally, it assesses the effectiveness of AI/ML-based adaptive decision-making in improving crop management and resource utilization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The PFS was implemented using a structured framework integrating hardware, software, and data processing components. Data from phenotyping platforms, including plant area (PA) measurements and digital biomass (DBM) estimates from four cereal cultivars under varying nitrogen levels (NL) and drought conditions (DC), were aggregated into the PFS. Three regression models such as Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest were trained and evaluated using a structured pre-processing pipeline. Hyperparameters were optimized through grid search with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE). Tests were conducted to validate the system's reliability and applicability.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>The experimental implementation of the PFS demonstrated its capability to collect and analyse data from various sources effectively. The SVR model had the highest accuracy with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.992 and an NRMSE significantly lower than other models followed by Random Forest and Ridge Regression. SVR was good at understanding complex relationships and worked well with unseen nitrogen levels. Random Forest showed limitations in generalization due to data dependency. The integration of AI-powered servers like PFS improve precision agriculture by making real-time data analysis possible, allowing smart decisions, and using resources more efficiently.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The integration of AI-powered systems like PFS represents a significant advancement in sustainable farming. These systems help drive innovation and tackle important agricultural problems, leading to
由于气候变化、资源限制和对可持续做法的需求,农业生产力面临越来越大的挑战。以人工智能(AI)为动力的精准农业整合了高通量表型,为监测作物性状、生长模式和对环境因素的反应提供了实际的进步。Pheno-Farm Server (PFS)利用人工智能驱动的方法整合实时数据,对其进行分析,并实现自适应决策,以便在不同的农业环境(如温室、雨棚(ROS)、实验农场和开放田地)中进行有效的作物管理。这使利益相关者能够做出明智的、数据驱动的决策。目的通过自适应人工智能模型评估PFS在推进精准农业方面的潜力。它侧重于系统的收集、处理和分析数据的能力,通过开发一个强大的管道来整合表型数据集和优化氮的应用。此外,它还评估了基于人工智能/机器学习的适应性决策在改善作物管理和资源利用方面的有效性。方法采用集成硬件、软件和数据处理组件的结构化框架实现PFS。来自表型平台的数据,包括4个谷物品种在不同氮水平(NL)和干旱条件(DC)下的植物面积(PA)测量和数字生物量(DBM)估计,被汇总到PFS中。采用结构化预处理管道对岭回归、支持向量回归和随机森林三种回归模型进行了训练和评估。通过网格搜索优化超参数,并进行5次交叉验证。采用决定系数(R2)和归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)评估模型性能。通过试验验证了系统的可靠性和适用性。结果与结论PFS的实验实现证明了它能够有效地收集和分析来自各种来源的数据。SVR模型精度最高,R2为0.992,NRMSE显著低于随机森林和Ridge回归后的其他模型。SVR擅长理解复杂的关系,并且在看不见的氮水平下工作得很好。由于数据依赖性,随机森林在泛化方面存在局限性。PFS等人工智能服务器的集成使实时数据分析成为可能,允许做出明智的决策,并更有效地利用资源,从而改善了精准农业。像PFS这样的人工智能系统的集成代表了可持续农业的重大进步。这些系统有助于推动创新和解决重要的农业问题,从而实现高产、盈利和环境友好型农业。这项研究展示了人工智能如何改变传统农业,并为数据驱动的农业实践设定新的标准。
{"title":"AI-powered Pheno-Farm Server: Making adaptive farming decisions","authors":"Kenny Paul ,&nbsp;Stefan Schweng ,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Kaul ,&nbsp;Franz Gansberger ,&nbsp;Andreas Holzinger","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104563","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104563","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Context&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Agricultural productivity faces growing challenges due to climate variability, resource constraints, and the demand for sustainable practices. Precision agriculture, powered by artificial intelligence (AI) integrate high-throughput phenotyping, offers practical advancements for monitoring crop traits, growth patterns, and responses to environmental factors. The Pheno-Farm Server (PFS) leverages AI-driven approaches to integrate real-time data, analyse it, and enable adaptive decision making for efficient crop management in diverse farming environments such as glasshouses, rain-out shelters (ROS), experimental farms, and open fields. This empowers stakeholders to make informed, data-driven decisions.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study evaluates the potential of the PFS in advancing precision agriculture through adaptive AI models. It focuses on the system's ability to collect, process, and analyse data by developing a robust pipeline for integrating phenotyping datasets and optimizing nitrogen application. Additionally, it assesses the effectiveness of AI/ML-based adaptive decision-making in improving crop management and resource utilization.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The PFS was implemented using a structured framework integrating hardware, software, and data processing components. Data from phenotyping platforms, including plant area (PA) measurements and digital biomass (DBM) estimates from four cereal cultivars under varying nitrogen levels (NL) and drought conditions (DC), were aggregated into the PFS. Three regression models such as Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest were trained and evaluated using a structured pre-processing pipeline. Hyperparameters were optimized through grid search with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE). Tests were conducted to validate the system's reliability and applicability.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results and conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The experimental implementation of the PFS demonstrated its capability to collect and analyse data from various sources effectively. The SVR model had the highest accuracy with an R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; of 0.992 and an NRMSE significantly lower than other models followed by Random Forest and Ridge Regression. SVR was good at understanding complex relationships and worked well with unseen nitrogen levels. Random Forest showed limitations in generalization due to data dependency. The integration of AI-powered servers like PFS improve precision agriculture by making real-time data analysis possible, allowing smart decisions, and using resources more efficiently.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Significance&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The integration of AI-powered systems like PFS represents a significant advancement in sustainable farming. These systems help drive innovation and tackle important agricultural problems, leading to","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104563"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Farm-level adaptations to harvest logistics constraints in export-oriented grain systems 在以出口为导向的粮食系统中,农场层面对收获物流限制的适应
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104565
Garima , Doina Olaru , Brett Smith , Kadambot H.M. Siddique

Context

Grain Producers in export-oriented grain systems face mounting pressure to coordinate harvest logistics under growing climatic, institutional, and infrastructure constraints. These stresses are especially acute in regions with decentralised production, long transport routes, and limited receival and labour capacity. In such settings, logistics adaptability is not just an operational concern but a critical factor shaping farmers' access to markets and overall system performance.

Objective

This study investigates how Western Australian (WA) grain farmers adapt their storage, freight, and delivery strategies in response to misalignments between on-farm decision-making and centralised grain logistics infrastructure.

Methods

Using an abductive, mixed-methods approach—including 48 surveys, 19 interviews, and media and policy document analysis—we explored how farm-level decisions interact with institutional asymmetries and inflexible infrastructure. The design is theoretically informed by Actor–Network Theory to trace translations, enrolment and obligatory passage points among heterogeneous human/non-human actors, and by the Actors–Resources–Activities framework to map actor bonds, resource ties and activity links across inland logistics.

Results and conclusions

The findings reveal that growers rely on on-farm storage, investment in mobile freight capacity, and tactical scheduling to manage seasonal bottlenecks and limited delivery access. These strategies are shaped by market signals, spatial disparities in receival infrastructure and transport options and behavioural heuristics that help farmers navigate institutional constraints. While such adaptations provide short-term resilience, they also create inefficiencies and reinforce systemic inequities in harvest throughput, export timing, and access to price premiums.

Significance

This study contributes to ongoing debates on agricultural systems resilience by linking farm-level behavioural adaptation with infrastructure governance and logistics system design. It highlights the need for modelling frameworks—such as agent-based or participatory approaches—that reflect decentralised, spatially differentiated decision-making. Implications are drawn for transport planning, cooperative infrastructure policy, and the development of future decision-support systems tailored to export-reliant agricultural regions.
在日益严重的气候、体制和基础设施限制下,出口导向型粮食系统的粮食生产者在协调收获物流方面面临越来越大的压力。这些压力在生产分散、运输路线长、接收和劳动力能力有限的区域尤为严重。在这种情况下,物流适应性不仅是一个操作问题,而且是影响农民进入市场和整体系统绩效的关键因素。本研究调查了西澳大利亚州(WA)的粮食农民如何适应他们的储存、货运和交付策略,以应对农场决策和集中粮食物流基础设施之间的错位。方法采用诱捕、混合方法——包括48项调查、19次访谈以及媒体和政策文件分析——我们探讨了农场层面的决策如何与制度不对称和不灵活的基础设施相互作用。该设计在理论上以行动者-网络理论为依据,用于追踪异质人类/非人类行动者之间的翻译、登记和强制性通道点,并以行动者-资源-活动框架为依据,用于映射跨内陆物流的行动者联系、资源联系和活动联系。结果和结论研究结果表明,种植者依靠农场储存、对移动货运能力的投资和战术调度来管理季节性瓶颈和有限的交付通道。这些战略受到市场信号、接收基础设施和运输选择的空间差异以及帮助农民克服制度限制的行为启发法的影响。虽然这种调整提供了短期抵御能力,但也造成了效率低下,并加剧了收获吞吐量、出口时机和获得价格溢价方面的系统性不公平。本研究通过将农场层面的行为适应与基础设施治理和物流系统设计联系起来,为正在进行的关于农业系统弹性的辩论做出了贡献。它强调了对建模框架的需求,例如基于代理或参与式方法,这些框架反映了分散的、空间差异化的决策。本文对运输规划、合作基础设施政策以及为依赖出口的农业地区量身定制未来决策支持系统的发展提出了建议。
{"title":"Farm-level adaptations to harvest logistics constraints in export-oriented grain systems","authors":"Garima ,&nbsp;Doina Olaru ,&nbsp;Brett Smith ,&nbsp;Kadambot H.M. Siddique","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104565","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104565","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Grain Producers in export-oriented grain systems face mounting pressure to coordinate harvest logistics under growing climatic, institutional, and infrastructure constraints. These stresses are especially acute in regions with decentralised production, long transport routes, and limited receival and labour capacity. In such settings, logistics adaptability is not just an operational concern but a critical factor shaping farmers' access to markets and overall system performance.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study investigates how Western Australian (WA) grain farmers adapt their storage, freight, and delivery strategies in response to misalignments between on-farm decision-making and centralised grain logistics infrastructure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using an abductive, mixed-methods approach—including 48 surveys, 19 interviews, and media and policy document analysis—we explored how farm-level decisions interact with institutional asymmetries and inflexible infrastructure. The design is theoretically informed by Actor–Network Theory to trace translations, enrolment and obligatory passage points among heterogeneous human/non-human actors, and by the Actors–Resources–Activities framework to map actor bonds, resource ties and activity links across inland logistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>The findings reveal that growers rely on on-farm storage, investment in mobile freight capacity, and tactical scheduling to manage seasonal bottlenecks and limited delivery access. These strategies are shaped by market signals, spatial disparities in receival infrastructure and transport options and behavioural heuristics that help farmers navigate institutional constraints. While such adaptations provide short-term resilience, they also create inefficiencies and reinforce systemic inequities in harvest throughput, export timing, and access to price premiums.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This study contributes to ongoing debates on agricultural systems resilience by linking farm-level behavioural adaptation with infrastructure governance and logistics system design. It highlights the need for modelling frameworks—such as agent-based or participatory approaches—that reflect decentralised, spatially differentiated decision-making. Implications are drawn for transport planning, cooperative infrastructure policy, and the development of future decision-support systems tailored to export-reliant agricultural regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104565"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
There is more to it than just adoption: Exploring agricultural mechanisation journeys in South Asia 这不仅仅是采用:探索南亚的农业机械化之旅
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104564
B. Brown , P. Timsina , A. Chaudhary , E. Karki , A. Sharma , K.K. Das , A. Ghosh , M.W. Rahman

CONTEXT

Agri-mechanisation continues to be a policy and development priority across the Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia. However, adoption evaluations are often constrained by methodological limitations, including narrow sampling, restricted analytical scope, and an overreliance on binary adoption metrics. These shortcomings hinder a deeper understanding of the dynamics and quality of mechanisation adoption in the region.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to improve the assessment of agri-mechanisation adoption by introducing and applying a comprehensive analytical framework (‘Five Ps of Adoption Analysis’) to move beyond binary metrics and uncover the underlying patterns, processes, and pathways of mechanisation uptake.

METHODS

The ‘Five Ps’ framework was applied to survey data on the use of eight key agricultural machines collected from 5053 households across 55 villages in Nepal, India, and Bangladesh. The framework integrates proportional, temporal, typological, pathway, and process-based analyses to enable a multidimensional evaluation of adoption.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The analysis reveals critical insights into regional mechanisation trends, including significant constraints in extension systems, sub-optimal adoption rates, and the presence of pseudo-adoption. Temporal and typological analyses expose the uneven evolution of adoption processes across contexts and machine types. The framework offers a novel means to capture the diversity and progression of adoption over time, providing a richer understanding than traditional binary approaches.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study advances methodological approaches in mechanisation research and offers practical insights for policymakers and development practitioners. By identifying key barriers and dynamic adoption patterns, the findings support more targeted interventions and highlight the need for complementary qualitative research to inform sustainable agri-mechanisation strategies in South Asia.
农业机械化仍然是整个南亚东部恒河平原的政策和发展重点。然而,采用评估经常受到方法限制的约束,包括狭窄的抽样、受限的分析范围和对二元采用度量的过度依赖。这些缺点阻碍了对该地区机械化采用的动态和质量的深入了解。本研究旨在通过引入和应用一个全面的分析框架(“采用分析的五个p”)来改进对农业机械化采用的评估,以超越二元指标,揭示机械化采用的潜在模式、过程和途径。方法采用“五个p”框架对尼泊尔、印度和孟加拉国55个村庄的5053户家庭收集的8种关键农业机械的使用数据进行调查。该框架集成了比例、时间、类型、途径和基于过程的分析,以实现对采用的多维评估。结果与结论该分析揭示了区域机械化趋势的关键见解,包括推广系统的显著限制、次优采用率和伪采用率的存在。时间和类型分析揭示了跨上下文和机器类型的采用过程的不平衡演变。该框架提供了一种新颖的方法来捕捉随着时间的推移采用的多样性和进展,提供了比传统的二元方法更丰富的理解。本研究推进了机械化研究的方法论方法,并为政策制定者和发展实践者提供了实践见解。通过确定关键障碍和动态采用模式,研究结果支持更有针对性的干预措施,并强调需要进行补充性质的研究,为南亚的可持续农业机械化战略提供信息。
{"title":"There is more to it than just adoption: Exploring agricultural mechanisation journeys in South Asia","authors":"B. Brown ,&nbsp;P. Timsina ,&nbsp;A. Chaudhary ,&nbsp;E. Karki ,&nbsp;A. Sharma ,&nbsp;K.K. Das ,&nbsp;A. Ghosh ,&nbsp;M.W. Rahman","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104564","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104564","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agri-mechanisation continues to be a policy and development priority across the Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia. However, adoption evaluations are often constrained by methodological limitations, including narrow sampling, restricted analytical scope, and an overreliance on binary adoption metrics. These shortcomings hinder a deeper understanding of the dynamics and quality of mechanisation adoption in the region.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study aims to improve the assessment of agri-mechanisation adoption by introducing and applying a comprehensive analytical framework (‘Five Ps of Adoption Analysis’) to move beyond binary metrics and uncover the underlying patterns, processes, and pathways of mechanisation uptake.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The ‘Five Ps’ framework was applied to survey data on the use of eight key agricultural machines collected from 5053 households across 55 villages in Nepal, India, and Bangladesh. The framework integrates proportional, temporal, typological, pathway, and process-based analyses to enable a multidimensional evaluation of adoption.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The analysis reveals critical insights into regional mechanisation trends, including significant constraints in extension systems, sub-optimal adoption rates, and the presence of pseudo-adoption. Temporal and typological analyses expose the uneven evolution of adoption processes across contexts and machine types. The framework offers a novel means to capture the diversity and progression of adoption over time, providing a richer understanding than traditional binary approaches.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study advances methodological approaches in mechanisation research and offers practical insights for policymakers and development practitioners. By identifying key barriers and dynamic adoption patterns, the findings support more targeted interventions and highlight the need for complementary qualitative research to inform sustainable agri-mechanisation strategies in South Asia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104564"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145516463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Applications of ecological niche and species distribution models in agricultural, livestock, and forestry systems: A comprehensive review 生态位和物种分布模型在农业、畜牧业和林业系统中的应用综述
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104542
Lucas A. Fadda , Rodrigo Lasa-Covarrubias , Luis Osorio-Olvera , M. Gabriela Murúa , Andrés Lira-Noriega

CONTEXT

Declining global agricultural productivity driven by climate variability and pest proliferation creates unprecedented food security challenges that traditional management approaches cannot adequately address. Ecological Niche Models (ENM) and Species Distribution Models (SDM) have emerged as powerful frameworks for predicting spatial distributions under future climate scenarios. These approaches enable identification of optimal cultivation zones and development of targeted adaptation strategies that enhance resilience across agricultural systems while supporting proactive management for global food security.

OBJECTIVE

This review explores the development and use of ENM and SDM in agriculture, livestock, and forestry, emphasizing their role in identifying production areas, assessing risks from pests, diseases, and weeds, and informing management decisions. It also addresses key methodological aspects and their growing importance in sanitary planning, food security, and climate adaptation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to examine ENM and SDM applications in productive systems. The analysis recorded specific uses, target organisms, study objectives, and key elements of model construction, parameterization, validation, transferability, and input data.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The review defined the current scope of ENM and SDM in productive systems and identified critical knowledge gaps. It highlights the value of the BAM framework to guide modeling design and interpretation. The findings provide a conceptual base for broader applications and identify future research and implementation opportunities.

SIGNIFICANCE

ENM and SDM transform complex ecological and production data into actionable insights that support policy, social, economic, and management decisions across agriculture, forestry, and livestock sectors. Their flexibility across scales enables tailored solutions. Technological advances will enhance their impact, positioning these models as essential tools for sustainable food security.
气候变率和有害生物扩散导致全球农业生产力下降,这对粮食安全构成前所未有的挑战,传统管理方法无法充分应对。生态位模型(ENM)和物种分布模型(SDM)已成为预测未来气候情景下空间分布的有力框架。这些方法有助于确定最佳种植区和制定有针对性的适应战略,从而增强整个农业系统的抵御力,同时支持对全球粮食安全的主动管理。本文综述了ENM和SDM在农业、畜牧业和林业中的发展和应用,强调了它们在确定生产区域、评估病虫害和杂草风险以及为管理决策提供信息方面的作用。它还讨论了关键的方法方面及其在卫生规划、粮食安全和气候适应方面日益增长的重要性。方法对ENM和SDM在生产系统中的应用进行了系统的文献综述。分析记录了具体用途、目标生物、研究目标以及模型构建、参数化、验证、可转移性和输入数据的关键要素。结果与结论本综述明确了ENM和SDM在生产系统中的当前范围,并确定了关键的知识缺口。它强调了BAM框架在指导建模设计和解释方面的价值。研究结果为更广泛的应用提供了概念基础,并确定了未来的研究和实施机会。意义enm和SDM将复杂的生态和生产数据转化为可操作的见解,为农业、林业和畜牧业的政策、社会、经济和管理决策提供支持。其跨规模的灵活性使定制解决方案成为可能。技术进步将增强其影响,使这些模式成为可持续粮食安全的重要工具。
{"title":"Applications of ecological niche and species distribution models in agricultural, livestock, and forestry systems: A comprehensive review","authors":"Lucas A. Fadda ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Lasa-Covarrubias ,&nbsp;Luis Osorio-Olvera ,&nbsp;M. Gabriela Murúa ,&nbsp;Andrés Lira-Noriega","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104542","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104542","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Declining global agricultural productivity driven by climate variability and pest proliferation creates unprecedented food security challenges that traditional management approaches cannot adequately address. Ecological Niche Models (ENM) and Species Distribution Models (SDM) have emerged as powerful frameworks for predicting spatial distributions under future climate scenarios. These approaches enable identification of optimal cultivation zones and development of targeted adaptation strategies that enhance resilience across agricultural systems while supporting proactive management for global food security.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This review explores the development and use of ENM and SDM in agriculture, livestock, and forestry, emphasizing their role in identifying production areas, assessing risks from pests, diseases, and weeds, and informing management decisions. It also addresses key methodological aspects and their growing importance in sanitary planning, food security, and climate adaptation.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We conducted a systematic literature review to examine ENM and SDM applications in productive systems. The analysis recorded specific uses, target organisms, study objectives, and key elements of model construction, parameterization, validation, transferability, and input data.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>The review defined the current scope of ENM and SDM in productive systems and identified critical knowledge gaps. It highlights the value of the BAM framework to guide modeling design and interpretation. The findings provide a conceptual base for broader applications and identify future research and implementation opportunities.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>ENM and SDM transform complex ecological and production data into actionable insights that support policy, social, economic, and management decisions across agriculture, forestry, and livestock sectors. Their flexibility across scales enables tailored solutions. Technological advances will enhance their impact, positioning these models as essential tools for sustainable food security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104542"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Estimating cumulative input effects in annual crop production: A LASSO-based panel data approach from India 估计年度作物生产的累积投入效应:来自印度的基于lasso的面板数据方法
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104555
Hiroyuki Takeshima , Avinash Kishore
<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>In non-experimental settings, evidence of interannual cumulative effects of inputs for annual crops (e.g., the effects of inputs in one year on outputs in the subsequent year) remains limited despite potential implications within dynamic production systems. The scarcity of sufficiently long annual panel data partly explains this. Furthermore, in non-experimental settings, quantities of many inputs are highly correlated with one another and across years, posing challenges when isolating such cumulative effects through conventional estimation methods.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>This study narrows these knowledge gaps by applying novel methods to unique annual panel datasets at district- and farm household-levels in India. Specifically, we identify whether certain inputs exhibit meaningfully significant cumulative effects on production relative to the non-cumulative effects and the effects of other inputs.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We start with flexible translog production functions appropriate for identifying cumulative effects in non-experimental settings. We apply shrinkage methods (LASSO and GMM-LASSO) to approximate production functions with reduced parameter dimensions, addressing multicollinearity among multiple inputs as well as among the same inputs across years, and potential endogeneity in inputs.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Throughout the shrinkage process, potassium fertilizer consistently remains a key predictor of outputs, while other inputs (land, labor, capital, irrigation, and other fertilizer nutrients) drop out mainly due to high collinearity with potassium and other inputs. More importantly, the cumulative quantity of potassium from the previous year, as well as the current year, is a consistently more critical determinant of production than the quantity of potassium from the current year alone, demonstrating the significant cumulative effects of potassium. These patterns hold both at district and farm levels across diverse agroecologies and cropping systems. Furthermore, the dynamic panel data analyses further suggest that farmers' use of potassium in the current year is significantly negatively affected by its use in the previous year, potentially stabilizing outputs across years. Earlier agronomic results suggesting residual effects of potassium are potentially relevant across wider geographic regions than previously thought. Simulation exercises reveal that the cumulative effects of potassium translate into a significant carryover of productivity into the following year and, combined with the dynamics, considerable repercussions on production during the subsequent years</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to verify the interannual cumulative effects of potassium fertilizer in nonexperimental settings, using methods that control for all other relevant production inputs and their potential cumulative effects with
在非实验环境下,尽管在动态生产系统中存在潜在影响,但证明一年生作物投入的年际累积效应(例如,一年投入对次年产出的影响)的证据仍然有限。缺乏足够长的年度面板数据在一定程度上解释了这一点。此外,在非实验环境中,许多输入的数量彼此之间高度相关,而且是跨年的,这给通过传统估计方法隔离这种累积效应带来了挑战。目的:本研究通过对印度地区和农户层面独特的年度面板数据集应用新颖的方法,缩小了这些知识差距。具体而言,我们确定相对于非累积效应和其他投入的效应,某些投入是否对生产表现出有意义的显著累积效应。方法我们从灵活的超对数生产函数开始,适合于识别非实验环境中的累积效应。我们应用收缩方法(LASSO和GMM-LASSO)来近似具有降维参数的生产函数,解决多个输入之间以及多年相同输入之间的多重共线性问题,以及输入中的潜在内生性问题。结果在整个收缩过程中,钾肥始终是产出的关键预测因子,而其他投入(土地、劳动力、资本、灌溉和其他肥料养分)主要由于与钾肥和其他投入的高度共线性而退出。更重要的是,前一年和本年度钾的累积量始终是比仅当年钾的数量更关键的生产决定因素,这表明钾的显著累积效应。这些模式在不同的农业生态和种植制度中都适用于地区和农场层面。此外,动态面板数据分析进一步表明,农民当年的钾用量受到前一年钾用量的显著负面影响,可能会稳定多年的产量。早期的农艺研究结果表明,钾的残留效应可能比以前认为的更广泛的地理区域相关。模拟试验表明,钾的累积效应转化为下一年的生产力的显著延续,并与动态相结合,对随后几年的生产产生相当大的影响。据作者所知,这是第一个在非实验环境下验证钾肥年际累积效应的研究。在灵活的超对数生产函数框架内,使用控制所有其他相关生产投入及其潜在累积效应的方法
{"title":"Estimating cumulative input effects in annual crop production: A LASSO-based panel data approach from India","authors":"Hiroyuki Takeshima ,&nbsp;Avinash Kishore","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104555","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;CONTEXT&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In non-experimental settings, evidence of interannual cumulative effects of inputs for annual crops (e.g., the effects of inputs in one year on outputs in the subsequent year) remains limited despite potential implications within dynamic production systems. The scarcity of sufficiently long annual panel data partly explains this. Furthermore, in non-experimental settings, quantities of many inputs are highly correlated with one another and across years, posing challenges when isolating such cumulative effects through conventional estimation methods.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;OBJECTIVE&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study narrows these knowledge gaps by applying novel methods to unique annual panel datasets at district- and farm household-levels in India. Specifically, we identify whether certain inputs exhibit meaningfully significant cumulative effects on production relative to the non-cumulative effects and the effects of other inputs.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;METHODS&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We start with flexible translog production functions appropriate for identifying cumulative effects in non-experimental settings. We apply shrinkage methods (LASSO and GMM-LASSO) to approximate production functions with reduced parameter dimensions, addressing multicollinearity among multiple inputs as well as among the same inputs across years, and potential endogeneity in inputs.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;RESULTS&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Throughout the shrinkage process, potassium fertilizer consistently remains a key predictor of outputs, while other inputs (land, labor, capital, irrigation, and other fertilizer nutrients) drop out mainly due to high collinearity with potassium and other inputs. More importantly, the cumulative quantity of potassium from the previous year, as well as the current year, is a consistently more critical determinant of production than the quantity of potassium from the current year alone, demonstrating the significant cumulative effects of potassium. These patterns hold both at district and farm levels across diverse agroecologies and cropping systems. Furthermore, the dynamic panel data analyses further suggest that farmers' use of potassium in the current year is significantly negatively affected by its use in the previous year, potentially stabilizing outputs across years. Earlier agronomic results suggesting residual effects of potassium are potentially relevant across wider geographic regions than previously thought. Simulation exercises reveal that the cumulative effects of potassium translate into a significant carryover of productivity into the following year and, combined with the dynamics, considerable repercussions on production during the subsequent years&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;SIGNIFICANCE&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to verify the interannual cumulative effects of potassium fertilizer in nonexperimental settings, using methods that control for all other relevant production inputs and their potential cumulative effects with","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104555"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spatial planning based on the modeling the food-energy-water‑carbon nexus: A case study of the Yangtze River basin 基于食物-能量-水-碳联系模型的空间规划——以长江流域为例
IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2025-11-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104552
Beibei Guo , Xian Zou , Yingxue Cui , Suchen Ying , Yinkang Zhou

Context

The food-energy-water (FEW) nexus is crucial for addressing global resource conflicts and sustainability challenges. It achieves this by securing resources, enhancing synergies, managing competition, and supporting climate adaptation. In the context of China, there is an urgent need to balance FEW securities with carbon neutrality in its food system, particularly given the complex environmental and socioeconomic pressures it faces.

Objective

This study aims to analyze correlations within the food-energy-water‑carbon (FEWC) nexus, characterize its resources, identify spatial allocation patterns and synergistic relationships, determine obstacles to agricultural sustainability, land planning, and cultivated land protection within the nexus, and propose tailored protection strategies for the basin.

Methods

Utilizing multi-source remote sensing data, FEWC resource potentials were characterized (integrated food production, power plant/renewable energy potential, total regional water production, carbon storage). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the Yangtze River basin data to study the FEWC nexus, using representative indicators providing a robust scientific characterization.

Results and conclusions

PCA showed the first principal component indicates FEWC synergies (reflecting overall synergy intensity), while the second reveals FEWC trade-offs. FEWC nexus evolution enhanced overall synergy but displayed an inverted U-shape pattern in terrestrial ecosystems, marked by growing energy dominance and a shift of food status. Consequently, food security's strategic importance decreased amid rising energy consumption, persistent water scarcity, and increasing carbon neutrality demands. Future conflicts concentrate in cultivated land areas. Spatial zoning requires prioritizing farmland protection and developing energy-agriculture linkages. Monitoring should track food production polarization and conflict zone changes, with FEWC synergy projected to rise in more than 70 % of cities. Carbon storage dynamics must also be monitored, while agricultural buffer zones are needed to reduce ecological risks.

Significance

The study provides valuable insights applicable to territorial spatial planning efforts at the basin scale. Furthermore, it offers tools with which to analyze complex resource nexuses and strategies for sustainable agricultural land management on a global scale.
粮食-能源-水(FEW)关系对于解决全球资源冲突和可持续性挑战至关重要。它通过确保资源、加强协同效应、管理竞争和支持气候适应来实现这一目标。在中国的背景下,特别是考虑到其面临的复杂的环境和社会经济压力,迫切需要在其粮食系统中平衡少数证券与碳中和。目的分析粮食-能源-水-碳(FEWC)关系的相关性,表征其资源特征,识别空间配置格局和协同关系,确定该关系中农业可持续发展、土地规划和耕地保护的障碍,并提出针对性的流域保护策略。方法利用多源遥感数据,对低碳水化合物资源潜力(综合粮食生产潜力、电厂/可再生能源潜力、区域总产水量、碳储量)进行表征。应用主成分分析(PCA)对长江流域数据进行分析,利用代表性指标对FEWC联系进行了稳健的科学表征。结果与结论spca表明,第一个主成分反映了FEWC的协同效应(反映了整体协同强度),第二个主成分反映了FEWC的权衡。FEWC联系演化增强了陆地生态系统的整体协同作用,但表现为能量优势增强和食物地位转移的倒u型格局。因此,在能源消耗不断上升、水资源持续短缺和碳中和需求不断增加的情况下,粮食安全的战略重要性有所下降。未来的冲突集中在耕地地区。空间分区要求优先考虑农田保护和发展能源与农业的联系。监测应跟踪粮食生产两极分化和冲突地区的变化,预计在70%以上的城市中,FEWC的协同效应将有所提高。碳储量动态也必须监测,同时需要农业缓冲区来减少生态风险。意义本研究为流域尺度的国土空间规划提供了有价值的见解。此外,它还提供了在全球范围内分析复杂资源关系和可持续农业用地管理战略的工具。
{"title":"Spatial planning based on the modeling the food-energy-water‑carbon nexus: A case study of the Yangtze River basin","authors":"Beibei Guo ,&nbsp;Xian Zou ,&nbsp;Yingxue Cui ,&nbsp;Suchen Ying ,&nbsp;Yinkang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104552","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The food-energy-water (FEW) nexus is crucial for addressing global resource conflicts and sustainability challenges. It achieves this by securing resources, enhancing synergies, managing competition, and supporting climate adaptation. In the context of China, there is an urgent need to balance FEW securities with carbon neutrality in its food system, particularly given the complex environmental and socioeconomic pressures it faces.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to analyze correlations within the food-energy-water‑carbon (FEWC) nexus, characterize its resources, identify spatial allocation patterns and synergistic relationships, determine obstacles to agricultural sustainability, land planning, and cultivated land protection within the nexus, and propose tailored protection strategies for the basin.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Utilizing multi-source remote sensing data, FEWC resource potentials were characterized (integrated food production, power plant/renewable energy potential, total regional water production, carbon storage). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the Yangtze River basin data to study the FEWC nexus, using representative indicators providing a robust scientific characterization.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>PCA showed the first principal component indicates FEWC synergies (reflecting overall synergy intensity), while the second reveals FEWC trade-offs. FEWC nexus evolution enhanced overall synergy but displayed an inverted U-shape pattern in terrestrial ecosystems, marked by growing energy dominance and a shift of food status. Consequently, food security's strategic importance decreased amid rising energy consumption, persistent water scarcity, and increasing carbon neutrality demands. Future conflicts concentrate in cultivated land areas. Spatial zoning requires prioritizing farmland protection and developing energy-agriculture linkages. Monitoring should track food production polarization and conflict zone changes, with FEWC synergy projected to rise in more than 70 % of cities. Carbon storage dynamics must also be monitored, while agricultural buffer zones are needed to reduce ecological risks.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The study provides valuable insights applicable to territorial spatial planning efforts at the basin scale. Furthermore, it offers tools with which to analyze complex resource nexuses and strategies for sustainable agricultural land management on a global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104552"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145473191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Agricultural Systems
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1