American Surgeon最新文献

Medical and surgical care remain a critical feature of disaster preparedness. The evolution of modern warfare introduces elements manifesting as both domestic and foreign terrorism. The fields of disaster and counterterrorism medicine continue to evolve in response to these looming threats. While perhaps not common, education, preparedness, and medical/surgical capabilities are paramount to an effective disaster and counterterrorism medical (and surgical) response. The present study examines the specific role of the surgeon within the scope of disaster and counterterrorism medicine.

Objectives: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) often require treatment with open lower extremity revascularization (LER). Patients with PAD often have other comorbidities and associated conditions that affect procedural outcomes, including abdominal stomas. The aim of this work is to investigate the impact that stomas may have on postoperative outcomes and complications.

Methods: We performed a 5-year (2016-2020) analysis of the Nationwide Readmission Database. We identified all adult patients undergoing open LER. These patients were categorized into 2 groups: stoma and no-stoma. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to control for demographics and comorbidities. Index admission outcomes and readmission rate were examined.

Results: 212,275 open LER patients were identified. A matched cohort of 3088 patients (1:1 stoma vs no-stoma) was obtained. Patients with stomas had higher rates of several postoperative complications: acute posthemorrhagic anemia (29.1%, P < 0.01), acute kidney injury (21.4%, P < 0.001), index sepsis (10.3%, P < 0.001), and index SSI (2.8%, P < 0.001). There were no significant statistical differences between the 2 groups for acute myocardial infarction. Those with stomas had worse outcomes: greater in-hospital mortality (4.7%, P < 0.05), length of stays (median 7 days, P < 0.001), total charges (median 108,037 dollars, P < 0.001), discharges to long-term care facilities (30.8%, P < 0.001), discharges to their own homes needing home health care (30.1%, P < 0.001), 30-day readmission rates (23.2%, P < 0.01), and 30-day readmission mortality (6.1%, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Concurrent abdominal stoma is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality after open LER. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the malignant probability of thyroid nodules diagnosed as indeterminate cytology, including atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), and investigate the diagnostic value of combining BRAF V600E gene testing within this classification.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 126 patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) examination of thyroid nodules and subsequent surgical treatment at Beijing Haidian Hospital between October 2021 and November 2022. Among them, there were 22 male and 104 female patients, aged between 18 and 75 years old. Surgical pathology results were considered the gold standard for diagnosing the nature of thyroid nodules, evaluating the malignant incidence of cytological results categorized as AUS/FLUS. Fisher's exact test and diagnostic test evaluation methods were used to analyze the discriminatory diagnostic efficacy of preoperative FNA combined with BRAF V600E gene testing for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software.

Results: In PTC patients, the BRAF V600E gene mutation rate was 87.93% (102/116). Within the category of FNA results as AUS/FLUS, the proportion of PTC was 60.00% (15/25). The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the BRAF V600E gene mutation in diagnosing PTC within the AUS/FLUS category were 10/10, 6/15, 6/6, and 10/19, respectively. The BRAF V600E gene mutation significantly increased the detection rate of PTC in patients classified under this cytology (P = 0.028, <0.05).

Conclusion: Preoperative FNA combined with BRAF V600E gene mutation testing significantly enhances the malignant detection rate of thyroid nodules diagnosed cytologically as AUS/FLUS. This combined approach provides a potent tool to improve diagnostic accuracy in this indeterminate classification.

Background: Despite increasing sub-specialization, general surgeons continue to perform oncologic thoracic surgeries. Our objective was to determine whether general surgery resident participation in thoracic surgery affects surgical quality or oncologic outcomes. We hypothesized that patient outcomes with and without resident participation would be similar. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of patients with stage 0-IV lung cancer undergoing oncologic pulmonary resection at BLINDED FOR REVIEW during an 11-year period (2012-2022). Patients younger than 18 years or older than 85 years were excluded, as were those who had incomplete follow-up data or were unregistered in our institutional cancer registry. Patients were divided into groups based on whether residents or staff surgeons completed >50% of the critical portions of the operation. We compared 30-day morbidity outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Three hundred thirteen patients met inclusion criteria. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups, as were types of surgical resection and median operative times. A statistical difference was found in the distribution of surgical approach. The odds of morbidity were 65% higher in the Staff group (OR=1.65; 95% CI, 1.007-2.71). Resident participation was not significantly associated with OS or DFS (P =.32 and P =.54, respectively). Discussion: General surgery resident involvement in lung cancer operations is not associated with longer operative times but is associated with a higher likelihood of a thoracotomy. General surgery resident involvement was associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and did not significantly affect OS or DFS.

Introduction: This study aims to explore the application value of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) technology in the treatment of incision infection dehiscence after surgery in patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer and analyze its impact on prognosis.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients who experienced incision infection dehiscence after surgery for colorectal cancer between February 2014 and August 2019. Clinical and pathological data, short-term outcomes, and long-term outcomes were compared between the traditional group and the VSD group.

Results: A total of 97 patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in clinical and pathological data between the traditional group and the VSD group (P > 0.05). The VSD group had fewer dressing changes, lower pain scores during dressing changes, and better granulation tissue growth grading than the traditional group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). The VSD group started adjuvant chemotherapy earlier and had a higher proportion of ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy. The three-year overall survival rate in the VSD group was better than the traditional group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The application of VSD technology can promote granulation tissue growth, accelerate incision healing, and facilitate patients to complete subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. However, further verification of its long-term impact on prognosis requires longer-term follow-up results.

Background: There is extensive literature describing the application of telemedicine techniques to trauma care. However, there is a paucity of articles showing quantitative assessment of its safety and efficacy. This structured review examines articles with quantitative assessment of telemedicine's impact in acute trauma care.

Methods: Medline and CINAHL databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles that quantitatively assess the impact of telemedicine on diagnostic accuracy, clinical decision-making, emergency department length of stay, transfer rates, and mortality in initial trauma management.

Results: Only 9 of the 408 screened articles met the criteria for quantitative assessment. Telemedicine appears to be preferentially used for more severely injured patients. Limited quality evidence supports procedural interventions at remote sites. Telemedicine may help abbreviate pre-transfer length of stay. However, its impact on diagnosis and mortality remains unclear.

Conclusions: Telemedicine's potential to enhance the quality and efficiency of trauma care, especially for resource-scarce areas, warrants continued quantitative research.

Neutropenia increases the complexity of surgical decision-making in cases of acute appendicitis. In this systematic review, we discuss medical vs surgical management and timing of appendectomy in the neutropenic adult patient. We queried databases utilizing the key words "neutropenia" and "appendicitis." The search identified 999 articles of which 481 articles were reviewed after duplicates were removed. Studies with pediatric patients, single case studies, and abdominal pain in neutropenic patients not caused by appendicitis were excluded. Seven studies remained in this review accounting for 130 patients, of which 28 were diagnosed with neutropenic appendicitis, and were included for final analysis. Four of the 7 articles were case reports, demonstrating the relative paucity of literature on this subject. Studies referred to the high risk of morbidity and mortality after surgical intervention in the neutropenic population, and attempting medical management first was common but not universal, reserving appendectomy for failure of medical management. Three studies suggested medical therapy as first-line management while 2 studies suggested surgical management and 2 studies did not distinguish a precedence. Both medical and surgical management have been successfully used in treating appendicitis in neutropenic patients. In most patients, medical management was attempted first (n = 16/28) vs immediate appendectomy (n = 7/28). Appendectomy was performed when medical management failed (n = 2/28) or after correction of neutropenia (n = 1/28). Timing or performance of appendectomy was unclear in 2 patients. With the increasing use of immunosuppressive medications, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and recent data from the CODA (Comparison of Outcomes of Antibiotic Drugs and Appendectomy) trial, medical management as a first-line treatment for most patients with neutropenia and appendicitis is warranted, and identifying a protocol for such patients would be of value.

Introduction: Whole blood (WB) is associated with improved mortality while lowering blood product utilization. Furthermore, statin medications are associated with favorable outcomes in traumatic brain injury and risk reduction of venous thromboembolism. However, the use of statin medications has not been evaluated in those receiving WB. The objective of this study is to determine the effects of pre-injury statin exposure on patients receiving WB.Methods: Patients that underwent WB first resuscitation and received pre-injury statins were compared to those that did not receive pre-injury statins. Demographics as well as complication rates, blood product transfusion volumes, and mortality were evaluated. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine independent predictors of mortality.Results: In the study period, 785 patients received WB as part of their resuscitation. One hundred and thirty five patients (17.3%) took statin medications prior to injury. Patients that were exposed to a pre-injury statin had a lower mortality rate than those that were not exposed (21.5% vs 32.5%, P = .01). After adjusting for imbalances, age, ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, admission systolic blood pressures, and pre-injury statin use were independent predictors of mortality following multiple logistic regression. When evaluating outcomes based on statin intensity, the use of high-intensity statins was associated with lower mortality (OR: .37, 95% CI: .13-.93), whereas moderate and low-intensity statins were not.Conclusion: In patients resuscitated with WB, pre-injury statins use was associated with improved outcomes. Specifically, patients that received high-intensity pre-injury statins appeared to be the population that benefited.